<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Voting Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/voting_rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Christie vetoes early voting bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/chris_christie_vetoes_early_voting_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/chris_christie_vetoes_early_voting_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey governor said the proposal was "hasty, counterproductive and less reliable"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Gov. Chris Christie vetoed a bill that would have allowed early voting by 15 days in New Jersey, calling it "hasty, counterproductive and less reliable."</p><p>"I support responsible and cost-efficient election reform that increases voter participation because democracy works best when the most people vote," he said of the veto. "But this bill risks the integrity and orderly administration of our elections by introducing a new voting method and process."</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/05/christie_vetoes_early_voting_b.html">Star-Ledger</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Christie, who is seeking re-election, raised the ire of unions and the Democratic Governors Association, who are backing his likely opponent, state Sen. Barbara Buono (D-Middlesex).</p> <p>"The governor’s veto shamefully silences the voices of an untold number of New Jersey families," New Jersey AFL-CIO President Charles Wowkanech said. The Democratic Governors Association immediately issued a statement likening Christie to what it called "shameless Republican governors restricting voting rights for partisan political gain," citing Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett and others.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/chris_christie_vetoes_early_voting_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/chris_christie_vetoes_early_voting_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rise of the conservative revolutionaries</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost half of Republicans think an armed revolution may be needed soon. What does it mean for guns and democracy?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's plenty of proof of an authoritarian streak and animus toward democratic ideals in today's conservative movement. There was the movement's use of its judicial power to halt a vote recount and instead <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/06/yes-bush-v-gore-did-steal-the-election.html">install</a> a president who had lost the popular vote. There is the ongoing GOP effort to make it <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-gop-war-on-voting-20110830">more difficult for people to cast a vote in an election</a>. There is the GOP's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/post/the-history-of-the-filibuster-in-one-graph/2012/05/15/gIQAVHf0RU_blog.html">record use of the Senate filibuster</a> to kill legislation that the vast majority of the country supports. There is a GOP leader's declaration that what the American people want from their government simply <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2627805#.UYEaob8Ts18">"doesn't matter."</a></p><p>Up until today, you might have been able to write all that anti-democratic pathology off as one infecting only the Republican Party's politicians and institutional leadership, but not its rank-and-file voters. But then this morning Fairleigh Dickinson University released this gun control-related pollshowing that authoritarianism runs throughout the the entire party.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>280</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arkansas overrides veto of voter ID law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/arkansas_overrides_veto_of_voter_id_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/arkansas_overrides_veto_of_voter_id_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Beebe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State legislators voted to override Dem Gov. Mike Beebe's veto of the bill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arkansas legislators voted Monday night to override the veto of Gov. Mike Beebe, a Democrat, and make it a law for voters to show photo ID before voting.</p><p>Both the state House and Senate are controlled by Republicans. The House voted 52-45 to override the veto, which had earlier passed in the state Senate by a margin of 21-12.</p><p>From the <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ark-house-finishes-veto-override-voter-id-bill">Associated Press</a>:</p><blockquote><p>While Arkansas poll workers must ask for identification under current law, voters don't have to show it to cast a ballot. Under the new law, voters who don't show photo identification can cast provisional ballots. Those ballots would be counted only if voters provide ID to county election officials or, before noon on the Monday following an election, sign an affidavit stating they are indigent or have a religious objection to being photographed.</p></blockquote><p>Beebe had called the bill "an expensive solution in search of a problem," but accepted the override of his veto. "He made his case as to why he thought it wasn't going to be good for Arkansas, but they have the final say and they've had that say," Beebe's spokesman, Matt DeCample, told the AP following the vote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/arkansas_overrides_veto_of_voter_id_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/arkansas_overrides_veto_of_voter_id_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The right wing&#8217;s Supreme Court whisperer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_right_wings_supreme_court_whisperer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_right_wings_supreme_court_whisperer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Blum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affirmative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet the right-wing non-lawyer who may get the Supreme Court to kill affirmative action and voting rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">On the Internet, no one knows you’re a dog, and in the Supreme Court, no one knows you’re not a lawyer. Or if they do, it doesn’t matter because you can still rewrite vast swathes of important legal code without having ever taken Torts 101.</p><p>At least that’s the lesson of Edward Blum, a conservative legal activist who, despite lacking formal legal education, has successfully pushed 14 cases to the nation’s highest court. Of the nearly 9,000 cased filed with the court last year, just 79 got oral arguments. Blum got two of them, and they’re both among the most-watched cases currently before the justices.</p><p>One, <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/shelby-county-v-holder/">Shelby County v. Holder</a>, could gut the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The other, <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/fisher-v-university-of-texas-at-austin/">Fisher v. University of Texas</a>, could outlaw affirmative action in college admissions and possibly elsewhere. Progressive legal activists and civil rights groups have sounded the alarm, putting both cases at the top of their agendas and warning that a bad decision could undermine decades of protections for minorities.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_right_wings_supreme_court_whisperer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_right_wings_supreme_court_whisperer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOPer at CPAC: I&#8217;ll &#8220;make&#8221; Republicans fix the Voting Rights Act</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/goper_at_cpac_ill_make_republicans_fix_the_voting_rights_act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/goper_at_cpac_ill_make_republicans_fix_the_voting_rights_act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Sensenbrenner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Supreme Court strikes down the Voting Rights Act, Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner says, Congress will have to act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, a conservative Republican, told Salon that if the Supreme Court strikes down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, he'll "make" Republicans take action to fix it.</p><p>"I think we should see what they did and I think we should, if possible, figure out a way to fix the Supreme Court's objections," Sensenbrenner, who represents Wisconsin, said at CPAC. "The Voting Rights Act has been, I think, the most effective of all of the civil rights laws. It enfranchised all minorities in the south, and that includes both African Americans and Republicans."</p><p>He added: "If you look at what happened after Section 5 was amended in 1982, the number of African-American and Republican representatives in Congress and in state legislatures has gone way up."</p><p>When asked if Republicans have the political will to act if the VRA is struck down, Sensenbrenner told Salon: "I'm gonna make them fix it."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/goper_at_cpac_ill_make_republicans_fix_the_voting_rights_act/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/goper_at_cpac_ill_make_republicans_fix_the_voting_rights_act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to fight voter suppression</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/how_to_fight_voter_suppression/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/how_to_fight_voter_suppression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13222071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The anniversary of Bloody Sunday brings key lessons for today's voting rights movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forty-eight years to the day after Bloody Sunday, a seminal tragedy that paved the way for the Voting Rights Act, there are key lessons we must remember and heed, in order to strengthen that now-threatened legislation.</p><p>Every year, as February turns to March, thousands return to Selma, Ala., to commemorate the moment President Lyndon Johnson later compared to Lexington and Concord, calling it “a turning point in man’s unending search for freedom.” But few know that this important event was the result of a series of accidents and almost did not occur. More important, it suggests that change in America is not inevitable and comes only when determined people risk their lives to achieve it.<strong></strong></p><p>On Sunday, March 7, 1965, peaceful demonstrators attempting to cross Selma’s Edmund Pettus Bridge were attacked by Alabama State troopers armed with bats, electric cattle prods and tear gas. “I’m going to die here,” thought John Lewis, one of the march’s leaders, as he fell to the ground, concussed by a trooper<strong>’</strong>s bat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/how_to_fight_voter_suppression/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/how_to_fight_voter_suppression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida finds evidence of voter fraud by GOP-tied firm</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/florida_finds_evidence_of_voter_fraud_in_gop_tied_firm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/florida_finds_evidence_of_voter_fraud_in_gop_tied_firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Allied Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Sproul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13220578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two employees of the Republican-aligned Strategic Allied Consulting admit to forging voter registration forms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two former employees of the consulting firm Strategic Allied Consulting, whose head Nathan Sproul has a history of legal issues as well as ties to the Republican Party, admitted to law enforcement that they committed voter fraud, the Associated Press reports.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/03/05/3268426/florida-finds-evidence-of-voter.html">AP</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The Florida Department of Law Enforcement reported Tuesday that the two ex-employees were charged with a third degree felony. But prosecutors back in January decided to place both of them on probation because neither has a criminal history.</p> <p>Strategic Allied Consulting was hired by Republicans to do voter registration drives in Florida and other states. But last fall, the state party fired the company and took the additional step of filing an election fraud complaint against the company with state officials.</p></blockquote><p>Rebekah Joy Paul submitted 20 fake voter registration applications, according to the FDLE, while Christian Davis Price submitted seven. Both alleged that they were told they would not get paid unless they submitted a certain number of applications, and Paul alleges that she was instructed not to register Democrats.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/florida_finds_evidence_of_voter_fraud_in_gop_tied_firm/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/florida_finds_evidence_of_voter_fraud_in_gop_tied_firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Keep key Voting Rights Act provision</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/obama_keep_key_voting_rights_act_provision_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/obama_keep_key_voting_rights_act_provision_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13208638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments about a crucial part of the voting rights law on Wednesday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <div id="fontprefs_top"> <div id="text-pages"> <div> <p>WASHINGTON (AP) — President <a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/?controllerName=search&amp;action=search&amp;channel=news&amp;search=1&amp;inlineLink=1&amp;query=%22Barack+Obama%22">Barack Obama</a> says it will become harder to help people who believe their voting rights have been violated if the <a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/?controllerName=search&amp;action=search&amp;channel=news&amp;search=1&amp;inlineLink=1&amp;query=%22Supreme+Court%22">Supreme Court</a> strikes down a key part of a voting rights law.</p> <p>The court is set to hear arguments Wednesday. It's a challenge to a section of the law requiring states and local governments with a history of racial discrimination to get <a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/?controllerName=search&amp;action=search&amp;channel=news&amp;search=1&amp;inlineLink=1&amp;query=%22Justice+Department%22">Justice Department</a> approval before making changes that affect elections.</p> <p>The appeal from Shelby County, Ala., argues that places covered by the law have made such progress that Washington oversight is unnecessary.</p> <p>Defenders of the law say it's still needed.</p> <p>Obama said Friday that ending federal oversight would stop people from challenging potential obstacles to voting before they are put in place.</p> </div> </div> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/obama_keep_key_voting_rights_act_provision_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/obama_keep_key_voting_rights_act_provision_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia GOP jumps on the deform-the-electoral vote bandwagon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/virginia_republicans_jump_on_the_deform_the_electoral_vote_bandwagon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/virginia_republicans_jump_on_the_deform_the_electoral_vote_bandwagon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electoral College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans know America doesn't support them, so now they're looking to count less of America]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, Virginia Republicans pulled <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/01/republicans-dirty-trick-inauguration.php">the old "surprise redistricting while a civil rights hero was out of town attending the president's inauguration on Martin Luther King Day" trick</a>. That was just a prelude to the real show: <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/01/23/virginia_state_senate_moves_ahead_on_electoral_college_rigging_bill.html">Blatantly anti-democratic electoral vote rejiggering.</a> A state Senate subcommittee recommended a bill to "apportion electors according to which presidential candidate carries each of the state's 11 congressional districts," replacing Virginia's current "winner-takes-all" system with one that would've given Mitt Romney a majority of Virginia's electoral votes in 2012.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/virginia_republicans_jump_on_the_deform_the_electoral_vote_bandwagon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/virginia_republicans_jump_on_the_deform_the_electoral_vote_bandwagon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court continues order targeting voter intimidation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minorities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13170842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC failed to get the Court to end an order aimed at preventing intimidation of minority voters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has turned down an effort by the Republican National Committee to end a 30-year-old court order aimed at preventing intimidation of minority voters.</p><p>The justices did not comment Monday in rejecting an appeal of lower court decisions that left the order in place at least until 2017.</p><p>The order stems from a lawsuit filed by Democrats in New Jersey in 1981 that objected to a "ballot security" program the RNC ran in minority neighborhoods.</p><p>Republicans said the order hampers efforts to combat voter fraud, but U.S. District Judge Dickinson Debevoise said voter intimidation remains a threat and preventing it outweighs the potential danger of fraud.</p><p>The court action is unrelated to legal challenges to Republican-inspired voter identification laws in the 2012 campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Mr. President: &#8220;Fix that&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/dear_mr_president_fix_that/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/dear_mr_president_fix_that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Fluke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election day voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One request for President obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twelve years after the 2000 Election crisis, dismal voting conditions continue. It's time for real reform]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of us who were still awake late into election night 2012 heard President Obama say, “I want to thank every American who participated in this election, whether you voted for the very first time or waited in line for a very long time. By the way, we have to fix that."  If I could ask President Obama to do just one thing over the next four years, I would ask him to use his leadership to “fix that.”</p><p>Twelve years after the startling disarray of the 2000 election, in too many states dismally bad election administration has become the expected course. Hours-long lines, malfunctioning voting machines, and hopelessly confusing ballots are the headlines potential voters see.  How can we expect that busy citizens will not be deterred from voting by the thought of such barriers? Every botched election and new barrier to voting causes even more citizens to completely disengage from their own governance.</p><p>This year, we saw thousands of our fellow citizens still wait in those endless lines, cast provisional ballots and file complaints when they were illegally denied the opportunity to vote.  American citizens are literally fighting for their right to vote.  Now it’s time that Congress and President Obama step to that fight.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/dear_mr_president_fix_that/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/dear_mr_president_fix_that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The election commission with no commissioners</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_election_commission_with_no_commissioners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_election_commission_with_no_commissioners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting irregularities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An organization designed to make elections function better has been hamstrung by GOP obstruction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite rampant concerns on both the right and left about the integrity of the election, we seem to have dodged a bullet on Nov. 7, at least on the presidential level. There were no serious problems reported -- no hanging chads, endless recounts or credible evidence of widespread dirty tricks -- and <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/11/15/section-3-the-voting-process-and-the-accuracy-of-the-vote/">97 percent of voters</a> said they had no problems voting this year, aside from waiting in lines.</p><p>It’s lucky that was the case, because the federal commission tasked with making elections function better has been stymied by partisan infighting that has left it with zero commissioners, with Republicans refusing to appoint new ones and blocking Democrats from doing the same.</p><p>Congress created the U.S. Election Assistance Commission with the passage of the Help America Vote Act of 2002, which allocated over $3 billion to help states improve their election administration and enacted a number of reforms aimed at preventing another debacle like the presidential election of 2000. The act passed with rare and overwhelming bipartisan support -- the House voted 357-48 in favor and the Senate 92-2 -- but the honeymoon didn’t last long and the commission soon fell victim to the partisan bickering that has hamstrung the Federal Election Commission.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_election_commission_with_no_commissioners/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_election_commission_with_no_commissioners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona elections still not over as suspicion builds</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/arizona_elections_still_not_over_as_suspicion_builds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/arizona_elections_still_not_over_as_suspicion_builds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter supression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting irregularities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Flake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Arpaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over 100,000 votes still haven't been counted, and activists fear Latinos' votes have been suppressed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The election may have ended almost two weeks ago, but in Arizona, it goes on. Perhaps it’s fitting for a state with its own time zone, but as of last night, there remained over 100,000 uncounted votes in the state’s two largest counties, leaving election officials unable to officially certify the results of a number of the state’s high profile races, including the Senate race, several House contests, and Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's reelection bid. Friday was the deadline for counties to finish counting ballots, but the state blew past it yesterday when Maricopa, which contains Phoenix, and Pima County, which contains Tucson, said they needed more time.</p><p>In most cases, the margins are the large enough by this point that candidates have declared victory or conceded defeat, even if the results aren’t official. And late Friday night, the Arizona Republic newspaper <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/20121116barber-wins-race-mcsally-arizona-district-2.html?nclick_check=1">declared</a> Democrat Ron Barber the winner in the highest profile race outstanding, the one to replace Democratic Rep. Gabby Giffords. That contest had been too close to call for over 10 days, with fewer than 1,000 votes separating Barber from Republican Martha McSally, but the remaining outstanding ballots come from heavily Democratic areas so the paper was able to project Barber's victory.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/arizona_elections_still_not_over_as_suspicion_builds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/arizona_elections_still_not_over_as_suspicion_builds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High court to take new look at voting rights law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/high_court_to_take_new_look_at_voting_rights_law_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/high_court_to_take_new_look_at_voting_rights_law_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/high_court_to_take_new_look_at_voting_rights_law_2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court will consider whether to eliminate the law that prevents discrimination at the polling places]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will consider eliminating the government's most potent weapon against racial discrimination at polling places since the 1960s. The court acted three days after a diverse coalition of voters propelled President Barack Obama to a second term in the White House.</p><p>With a look at affirmative action in higher education already on the agenda, the court is putting a spotlight on race by re-examining the ongoing necessity of laws and programs aimed at giving racial minorities access to major areas of American life from which they once were systematically excluded.</p><p>"This is a term in which many core pillars of civil rights and pathways to opportunity hang in the balance," said Debo Adegbile, acting president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund.</p><p>In an order Friday, the justices agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to the part of the landmark Voting Rights Act that requires all or parts of 16 states with a history of discrimination in voting to get federal approval before making any changes in the way they hold elections.</p><p>The high court considered the same issue three years ago but sidestepped what Chief Justice John Roberts then called "a difficult constitutional question."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/high_court_to_take_new_look_at_voting_rights_law_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/high_court_to_take_new_look_at_voting_rights_law_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey, Obama, let&#8217;s actually fix elections</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/hey_obama_lets_actually_fix_elections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/hey_obama_lets_actually_fix_elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We may be stuck with the electoral college, but a few simple reforms would drastically improve American democracy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a throwaway, seemingly ad-libbed line in his victory speech Tuesday night, Barack Obama noted the long lines many of his supporters had been forced to wait in in order to vote for him, and said, "We gotta fix that." And we do. We really, really need to improve the way Americans vote. It's embarrassing. So let's hope the president remembers that line and decides to act on it in his second term. If he does, I have some suggestions.</p><p>It would actually be quite easy -- logistically, not politically -- to "fix" American elections. There have been a million sober, bipartisan reports and plans to fix them that have been largely ignored. Paper ballots, universal or automatic voter registration, expanded nationwide early voting and stricter requirements for clear and concise ballots would solve many of the problems we saw this week. Lots of states already have most of these reforms in place. Most other Western nations have a much easier time of voting than we do and their systems are easy to copy and adapt.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/hey_obama_lets_actually_fix_elections/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/hey_obama_lets_actually_fix_elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No high court action on voting rights law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/29/no_high_court_action_on_voting_rights_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/29/no_high_court_action_on_voting_rights_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13056016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court sidestepps cases that would end the Voting Rights Act's advance approval requirement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Three years ago, the Supreme Court warned there could be constitutional problems with a landmark civil rights law that has opened voting booths to millions of African-Americans. Now, opponents of a key part of the Voting Rights Act are asking the high court to finish off that provision.</p><p>The basic question is whether state and local governments that once boasted of their racial discrimination still can be forced in the 21st century to get federal permission before making changes in the way they hold elections.</p><p>Some of the governments covered — most of them are in the South — argue they have turned away from racial discrimination over the years. But Congress and lower courts that have looked at recent challenges to the law concluded that a history of discrimination and more recent efforts to harm minority voters justify continuing federal oversight.</p><p>The Supreme Court took no action Monday on cases asking it to end the Voting Rights Act's advance approval requirement that has been held up as a crown jewel of the civil rights era.</p><p>The justices sidestepped this very issue in a case from Texas in 2009. In an opinion joined by eight justices, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote then that the issue of advance approval "is a difficult constitutional question we do not answer today."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/29/no_high_court_action_on_voting_rights_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/29/no_high_court_action_on_voting_rights_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How GOP voter suppression could win Florida for Romney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/how_gop_voter_suppression_could_win_florida_and_the_white_house_for_romney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/how_gop_voter_suppression_could_win_florida_and_the_white_house_for_romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov. Rick Scott (R-FLA)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13050137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many Florida Democrats will be disenfranchised by the GOP's war on voting? Enough to swing the election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might think being responsible for arguably the worst election debacle in American history, in 2000, would have spurred Florida's politicians to make the state the nation’s model for excellence in election administration. But in the past few years state Republicans, from Gov. Rick Scott on down, have worked tirelessly to come up with ways to limit the number of voters -- overwhelmingly, Democratic voters -- able to cast ballots on Nov. 6. And, with President Obama and Mitt Romney effectively tied for the state's crucial 29 electoral votes, these restrictions could end up determining who wins the presidency. In 2000, the contest came down to 537 votes; the number of people who may already have been left out of the process or will be by election day dwarfs that number many times over.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/how_gop_voter_suppression_could_win_florida_and_the_white_house_for_romney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/how_gop_voter_suppression_could_win_florida_and_the_white_house_for_romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney-linked voting machine company to count votes in Ohio</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/romney_linked_voting_machine_company_to_count_votes_in_ohio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/romney_linked_voting_machine_company_to_count_votes_in_ohio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hart Intercivic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting irregularities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13049134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The company counting critical votes in Ohio and Colorado has extensive connections to the Romney camp]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voting machine provider Hart Intercivic will be counting the votes in various counties in the crucial swing states of Ohio and Colorado and elsewhere throughout the country come Nov. 6 — even though it has extensive corporate ties to the Mitt Romney camp, and even though a study commissioned by the state of Ohio has labeled its voting system a “failure” when it comes to protecting the integrity of elections.</p><p>Reports of Hart Intercivic’s ties to Romney first surfaced in late September, in a <a href="http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2012/4725">blog post</a> by Gerry Bello and Bob Fitrakis in the Free Press, an Ohio website that reported that a key investor in Hart was HIG Capital, seven of whose directors were former employees of Bain &amp; Co., a consulting company of which Mitt Romney was once CEO. (Romney left the company in 1984 to co-found a spinoff company, Bain Capital.) HIG Capital announced its investment in Hart on July 6, 2011, just one month after Romney formally announced the launch of his presidential campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/romney_linked_voting_machine_company_to_count_votes_in_ohio/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/romney_linked_voting_machine_company_to_count_votes_in_ohio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voting while trans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/voting_while_trans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/voting_while_trans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transgender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13046448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man walks into a polling station. The rolls list him as female. Can he vote?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> Here’s the thing I loved about talking with Mara Keisling this week: her flat-out declaration that transpeople are winning their civil rights and cultural acceptance battles. I’m crazily Tiggerish on lesbian and gay issues: we’ve come so far so unbelievably fast, over my lifetime, that some days I bounce with glee. But given that the trans part of the LGBT coalition got started about 15 years later and has had very different challenges, I was still an Eeyore about their efforts. So it made my day to hear Keisling, the National Center for Transgender Equality executive director, declare a coming victory. “Science is on our side, first of all,” she explained. “Common sense is on our side. Decency is on our side. When you get that combination, you win every time.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/voting_while_trans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/voting_while_trans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voting groups demand New Mexico suppression probe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/voting_groups_demand_suppression_probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/voting_groups_demand_suppression_probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alleged dirty tricks surfaced last week in secret video]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, we reported on <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/voter_suppression_in_new_mexico/">a potential voter suppression effort</a> in Sandoval County, N.M., in which Republican officials trained activists to challenge voters’ rights to cast a ballot at the polls based on faulty information. A secretly recorded video of the training, along with a briefing manual, showed that GOP officials were misrepresenting the state’s election law in a way that could lead to “situations of voter intimidation [or] unequal treatment of voters,” an election official in the state told Salon.</p><p>Today, voting-rights groups are taking action, sending <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/109637297">a letter</a> to New Mexico Secretary of State Dianna Duran, the state’s top election official, asking for an investigation. “We are concerned that without corrective action on your part this and other incorrect information may result in disruption, delay and potentially disenfranchisement on Election Day,” the letter states.</p><p>The state’s Democratic attorney general has <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/new_mexico_gary_king_voter_intimidation.php">already said</a> he will investigate the training.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/voting_groups_demand_suppression_probe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/voting_groups_demand_suppression_probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
