<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > wages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/wages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GOP confuses government and family budgets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Ryan's newest plan focuses solely on the deficit and distracts from real economic goals, like jobs and wages]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Our biggest problems over the next ten years are not deficits,” the President told House Republicans Wednesday, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/us/politics/obama-to-meet-with-house-gop-over-budget.html">according to those who attended</a> the meeting.</p><p>The President needs to deliver the same message to the public, loudly and clearly. The biggest problems we face are unemployment, stagnant wages, slow growth, and widening inequality — not deficits. The major goal must be to get jobs and wages back, not balance the budget.</p><p>Paul Ryan’s budget plan — essentially, the House Republican plan — is designed to lure the White House and Democrats, and the American public, into a debate over how to balance the federal budget in ten years, not over whether it’s worth doing.</p><p>“This is an invitation,” Ryan explained when he unveiled the plan Tuesday. “Show us how to balance the budget. If you don’t like the way we’re proposing to balance our budget, how do you propose to balance the budget?”</p><p>Until now the President has seemed all too willing to engage in that debate. His ongoing talk of a “grand bargain” to reduce the budget deficit has played directly into Republican hands.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can we call it class war yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/02/can_we_call_it_class_war_yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/02/can_we_call_it_class_war_yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12949014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corporate profits are at an all-time high; wages are at an all-time low]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, David Segal at the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/24/business/apple-store-workers-loyal-but-short-on-pay.html?_r=1&amp;hp">New York Times</a> broke the news to America that not only was Apple -- the computer and gadget manufacturer formerly seen as a symbol of good old American ingenuity -- making its profits on the backs of abused factory workers in China, but also on poorly paid store employees here in the US.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>Apple store workers, he wrote, make up a large majority of Apple's US workforce — 30,000 out of 43,000 employees in this country — and they make about $25,000 a year, or about $12 an hour.</p><p><a href="http://www.epi.org/blog/apple-store-employees-wages/">Lawrence Mishel at the Economic Policy Institute</a> notes that's just a dollar above the federal poverty level. This for a company that paid nine of its top executives a total of $441 million in 2011.</p><p>“The discrepancy between Apple’s profits/executive pay and its compensation to its workers is a particularly glaring example of what is occurring in the wider economy,” Mishel writes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/02/can_we_call_it_class_war_yet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/02/can_we_call_it_class_war_yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
