<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Wall Street</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/wall_street/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 20:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dow rises for fourth straight year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/dow_rises_for_fourth_straight_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/dow_rises_for_fourth_straight_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 22:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow JOnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Stock Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The index is up more than 100 percent since its low in March 2009]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 7.3 percent in 2012, the fourth straight year in which the leading index maked gains. The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2012/12/31/all-the-numbers-you-need-to-know-dow-notches-fourth-straight-winning-year/">reports</a> that the index is up an impressive 100.15 percent since its great recession low in March 2009. </p><p>After climbing in the first three quarters of this year, the Dow dropped in the fourth quarter for the firt time since 2008. Despite ongoing concerns over the fiscal cliff, the Dow climbed 166 points today, its best ever showing on New Years Eve. The broader S&P 500 index had its best New Year's Eve since 1974. </p><p>WSJ: </p><blockquote><p>The S&P 500 and [technology heavy] Nasdaq both rose for the eighth year in the past 10, after slipping last year. The S&P stands 111% above its 2009 low, and the Nasdaq is 138% above its.</p></blockquote><p>These astounding gains show that the great recession was a once in a lifetime buying opportunity for those who still had faith in the markets (or money to invest).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/dow_rises_for_fourth_straight_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/dow_rises_for_fourth_straight_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bernie Madoff doesn&#8217;t like what he sees in the markets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/bernie_madoff_doesnt_like_what_he_sees_in_the_markets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/bernie_madoff_doesnt_like_what_he_sees_in_the_markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernie Madoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insider trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fraudster shares his insights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernie Madoff, the mastermind behind the largest investment fraud in American history, knows his share about skirting the financial markets. In a Christmas Eve letter to <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/100338795">CNBC</a> from his North Carolina prison cell, he detailed a few of his concerns about current conditions. Among other things, his letter demonstrates that a strong grasp of grammar is not a prerequisite to running a multi-billion dollar ponzi scheme. Here are a few of his thoughts:</p><p>On "dark pools," large block trades between institutions that are conducted outside the market and thus invisible to the public until they are completed:</p><blockquote><p>While I have always been an advocate of electronic trading due to the efficiency the lower costs they bring o the markets, I am nit (sic) a fan of the lack of transparency the DARK POOLS create.</p> <p>It is important to examine why there has been this growing interest in the use of dark pools. Markets have always focused on the speed with which information becomes available. Of course this information can be composed of various types.</p> <p>It could be corporate developments like earnings or mergers or it can be information regarding the placements of buy and sell orders and who is placing these orders. It is the latter information that has created the interest in the dark pools.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/bernie_madoff_doesnt_like_what_he_sees_in_the_markets/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/bernie_madoff_doesnt_like_what_he_sees_in_the_markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Little known company buys New York Stock Exchange for $8 billion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/little_known_company_buys_new_york_stock_exchange_for_8_billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/little_known_company_buys_new_york_stock_exchange_for_8_billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Stock Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The buyer is Atlanta-based IntercontinentalExchange, a 12-year-old futures trading outfit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — The New York Stock Exchange is being sold to a little-known rival in Atlanta for about $8 billion, ending more than two centuries of independence for the iconic Big Board.</p><p>The buyer, IntercontinentalExchange, a 12-year-old exchange that deals in investing contracts known as futures, said Thursday that little would change for the trading floor in Manhattan's financial district.</p><p>The NYSE dates to 1792, when 24 brokers and merchants traded stocks under a buttonwood tree on Wall Street. But its importance today is mostly symbolic. Most trading is done on computers that match thousands of orders a second.</p><p>"The cash equities business in America has effectively been obliterated," said Thomas Caldwell, chairman of Caldwell Securities in Toronto and a shareholder in the New York exchange's parent company, NYSE Euronext.</p><p>He said that the jewel of the deal is not the New York exchange but Liffe, a futures exchange founded in London.</p><p>"The original New York Stock Exchange, it's got a brand name, it's got recognition, but as a business it's a very small part of this thing," Caldwell said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/little_known_company_buys_new_york_stock_exchange_for_8_billion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/little_known_company_buys_new_york_stock_exchange_for_8_billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HSBC: Too big to jail</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/hsbc_too_big_to_jail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/hsbc_too_big_to_jail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glass-Steagall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being charged with money laundering, HSBC gets a Monopoly-style get-out-of-jail card]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/hsbc-said-to-near-1-9-billion-settlement-over-money-laundering/">reports this week</a> that megabank HSBC has escaped criminal prosecution for money laundering that probably funded terrorists and narcotics traffickers. Why? Because regulators and prosecutors were petrified that an indictment would undermine the entire financial system. The<em>Times</em> quotes anonymous government sources who confessed fears about bringing formal charges because doing so would be a "death sentence" for the bank. So they let it off the hook.</p><p>That’s right, HSBC is officially above the law. Too-big-to-fail has become too-big-to-prosecute.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/hsbc_too_big_to_jail/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/hsbc_too_big_to_jail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why does Wall Street suddenly hate Apple?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/why_does_wall_street_suddenly_hate_apple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/why_does_wall_street_suddenly_hate_apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stock has fallen 25 percent in less than three months, shaving $150 billion from the company's value]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This holiday season is shaping up to be a record-breaking period for Apple as shoppers snap up iPhones and iPads. So, why is the world's most valuable company losing its luster with investors?</p><p>Apple began selling the iPhone 5 on Sept. 21, the same day the company's stock hit an all-time peak of $705.07 per share. Since then, the stock has plunged nearly 25 percent, trimming the company's market value by more than $150 billion. On Friday, the stock fell almost 3 percent and closed at $533.25.</p><p>The sell-off has had broad impact. It has reached beyond Apple's own stockholders because the company is the largest component in the Standard &amp; Poor's 500 and Nasdaq composite index - two benchmarks that are tracked by widely held mutual funds and exchange traded funds, or ETFs.</p><p>Apple comprises 4 percent of the S&amp;P 500 and nearly 12 percent of the Nasdaq, according to FactSet. The Nasdaq has shed 6 percent since Apple's stock price peaked while the S&amp;P 500 has declined 3 percent, the same as the Dow Jones industrial average, which doesn't include Apple in its basket of 30 stocks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/why_does_wall_street_suddenly_hate_apple/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/why_does_wall_street_suddenly_hate_apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 real &#8220;cliffs&#8221; facing America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/3_real_cliffs_facing_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/3_real_cliffs_facing_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget the budget crisis hysteria. Obama has sterner challenges in child poverty, health care and global warming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The “fiscal cliff” is a a metaphor for a government that no longer responds to the biggest challenges we face because it’s paralyzed by intransigent Republicans, obsessed by the federal budget deficit, and overwhelmed by big money from corporations, Wall Street, and billionaires.</p><p>If we had a functional government America would address three “cliffs” posing far larger dangers to us than the fiscal one:</p><p><strong>The child poverty cliff.</strong></p><p>Between 2007 and 2011, the percentage of American school-age children living in poor households grew from 17 to 21%. Last year, according to the <a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err132.aspx">Agriculture Department</a>, nearly 1 in 4 young children lived in a family that had difficulty affording sufficient food at some point in the year.</p><p>Yet federal programs to help children and lower-income families – food stamps, aid for poor school districts, Pell grants, child health care, child nutrition, pre- and post-natal care, and Medicaid – are being targeted by the Republican right. Over 60 percent of the cuts in the GOP’s most recent budget came out of these programs.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/3_real_cliffs_facing_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/3_real_cliffs_facing_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Warren will reportedly get Senate Banking seat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/elizabeth_warren_will_reportedly_get_senate_banking_seat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/elizabeth_warren_will_reportedly_get_senate_banking_seat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Banking Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The senator-elect from Massachusetts will likely be appointed to serve on the committee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Warren will reportedly be tapped to serve on the Senate Banking Committee, the Boston Globe reports.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.boston.com/politicalintelligence/2012/12/04/elizabeth-warren-likely-get-senate-banking-committee-assignment/exjYm7HSGmKsrEBAg1dy5I/story.html">Globe</a> cites two anonymous Senate aides who say that Warren will be named to the committee in the new session of Congress:</p><blockquote><p>The appointment has not been formally announced by Senate leaders and will not be final until an official vote on assignments by the members. The pending appointment was described to the Globe by aides who requested anonymity because Senate Majority Leader Reid has not made a formal announcement.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/elizabeth_warren_will_reportedly_get_senate_banking_seat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/elizabeth_warren_will_reportedly_get_senate_banking_seat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; in 150 seconds</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/understanding_the_fiscal_cliff_in_150_seconds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/understanding_the_fiscal_cliff_in_150_seconds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats, listen up: Follow these eight guiding principles, and you just might save the U.S. economy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gMuA8I2M5l0?wmode=transparent&amp;autohide=1&amp;egm=0&amp;hd=1&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;modestbranding=1&amp;rel=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;showsearch=0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><div> <p><strong>UNDERSTANDING THE FISCAL CLIFF (IN 2 MINUTES 30 SECONDS)</strong></p> <p>Democrats, here are eight principles to guide you in the coming showdown over the fiscal cliff:</p> <p><strong>ONE: HOLD YOUR GROUND</strong>. The wealthy have to pay their fair share of taxes. That’s what the election was all about, and we won. It’s only fair they pay more. They’re taking home record share of national income and wealth, and have lowest effective tax rate in living memory.</p> <p><strong>TWO: NO DEAL IS BETTER THAN A BAD DEA</strong>L. You’re in a strong bargaining position. If you do nothing, the Bush tax cuts automatically expire in January, and we go back to rates during the Clinton administration. Which isn’t such a bad thing. As I recall we had a pretty good economy during the Clinton years.</p> <p><strong>T</strong><strong>HREE: MAKE REPUBLICANS VOTE ON EXTENDING THE TAX CUTS JUST FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS</strong>. After all the Bush tax cuts expire, have Republicans vote on extending the Bush tax cut just for the middle class. If they refuse and try to hold those tax cuts hostage to tax cuts for the wealthy, it will show whose side they’re on. They’ll pay the price in 2014.</p> <p><strong>FOUR: DEMAND HIGHER TAX RATES ON WEALTHY, NOT JUST LIMITS ON DEDUCTIONS</strong>. Don’t fall for Republican offers to limit some tax deductions on the wealthy. Demand we go back to higher tax rates on the wealthy and eliminate their unfair tax loopholes, so they truly start paying their fair share.</p> <p><strong>FIVE: DON’T CUT SAFETY NETS</strong>. Don’t sacrifice Medicare or Social Security, or programs for the poor. Americans depend on these safety nets and can’t afford any benefit cuts.</p> <p><strong>SIX: DON’T CUT INVESTMENTS IN OUR FUTURE PRODUCTIVITY</strong>. Education, basic R&amp;D, and infrastructure aren’t spending; they’re investments in our future prosperity. If the return on these investments is greater than the cost, they ought to be made, period.</p> <p><strong>SEVEN: CUT SPENDING ON MILITARY AND CORPORATE WELFARE</strong>. You want to cut, cut spending on the military — which now exceeds the military spending of the next 13 largest military spenders in the world combined. And cut corporate welfare — support to agribusiness, oil and gas, Big Pharma, big insurance and Wall Street.</p> <p><strong>EIGHT: PUT JOBS BEFORE DEFICIT REDUCTION</strong>. Finally, don’t cut the budget deficit as long as unemployment remains high. Otherwise you’ll cause the economy to contract, making the deficit even larger in proportion. That’s the austerity trap Europe has fallen into. We need to create American prosperity, not European austerity.</p> <p>Remember: Jobs come first.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/understanding_the_fiscal_cliff_in_150_seconds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/understanding_the_fiscal_cliff_in_150_seconds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austerity: The real &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/austerity_the_real_fiscal_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/austerity_the_real_fiscal_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh Carey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current "debtpocalypse" is just the last installment in the tragic dispossession of America's working class]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/us/fiscal-cliff-slope-debtpocalypse-it-means-austerity.html" target="_blank">Debtpocalypse</a>” looms.  Depending on who wins out in Washington, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/us/fiscal-cliff-slope-debtpocalypse-it-means-austerity.html" target="_blank">we’re told</a>, we will either free fall over the fiscal cliff or take a terrifying slide to the pit at the bottom.  Grim as these scenarios might seem, there is something confected about the <em>mise-en-scène</em>, like an un-fun Playland.  After all, there is <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175615/tomgram%3A_kramer_and_hellman,_it%27s_the_politics,_stupid/" target="_blank">no fiscal cliff</a>, or at least there was none -- until the two parties built it.</p><p>And yet the pit exists.  It goes by the name of “austerity.” However, it didn’t just appear in time for the last election season or the lame-duck session of Congress to follow.  It was dug more than a generation ago, and has been getting wider and deeper ever since.  Millions of people have long made it their home.  “Debtpocalypse” is merely the latest installment in a tragic, 40-year-old story of the dispossession of American working people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/austerity_the_real_fiscal_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/austerity_the_real_fiscal_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banks reportedly lining up against Elizabeth Warren committee spot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/banks_reportedly_lining_up_against_elizabeth_warren_committee_spot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/banks_reportedly_lining_up_against_elizabeth_warren_committee_spot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Banking Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lobbyists are gearing up for a fight over a possible Warren appointment to the Senate banking committee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Elizabeth Warren hasn't even taken office yet, and already banking lobbyists are reportedly lining up to prevent her from possibly taking a spot on the Senate Banking Committee.</p><p style="text-align: left;">Andy Kroll of <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/elizabeth-warren-senate-banking-committee">Mother Jones</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p> Aides to two senators on the banking committee tell <em>Mother Jones</em> the industry has already moved to block Warren from joining the committee, which is charged with drafting legislation regulating much of the financial industry. "Downtown"—shorthand for Washington's lobbying corridor—"has been going nuts" to keep her off the committee, another Senate aide says.</p> <p>Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), a banking committee member, has been angling to get Warren on the committee, "but there are many bank lobbyists pushing to keep her off," a top Democratic Senate aide told <em>Politico</em>'s Morning Money tipsheet. But the aide added, "If she really wants banking, it will be very tough politically to keep her off."</p></blockquote><p>This would be the second time banks fought a hard battle against Warren, who was blocked from taking a post as head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in 2011.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/banks_reportedly_lining_up_against_elizabeth_warren_committee_spot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/banks_reportedly_lining_up_against_elizabeth_warren_committee_spot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 hard truths progressives must face about Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/5_hard_truths_progressives_must_face_about_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/5_hard_truths_progressives_must_face_about_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13103076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that the joy of election night has subsided, it's time for a reality check: The president's still a centrist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Terrorized by the prospect of a complete takeover of the U.S. government by right-wing reactionaries—progressive Democrats swallowed their unhappiness with Barack Obama throughout the campaign. They gamely defended his policies on the economy, health care, budget priorities and other issues on which they felt betrayed in his first term.</p><p>We’ve now dodged the bullet of a Mitt Romney White House, so let’s get back to reality. Despite his campaign-trail populism, the president will continue the politics of accommodation to conservatives. Two of the three priorities he has set out for his next term are at the top of the GOP agenda: a “grand bargain” to cut government spending over the next 10 years and corporate tax reform that would cut rates—don’t hold your breath—and close loopholes. The third priority, rationalizing immigration law, is one of the few progressive ideas that also has the support of the Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/5_hard_truths_progressives_must_face_about_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/5_hard_truths_progressives_must_face_about_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s blueprint for strengthening financial reform</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/obamas_blueprint_for_strengthening_financial_reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/obamas_blueprint_for_strengthening_financial_reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank was a nice step, but the president needs to give regulators the resources to do their jobs. Here's how]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" align="left" /></a> One of the Obama administration’s biggest vulnerabilities when it comes to its first term policy legacy was that the roots of the legislation it ushered through wouldn’t take hold until around 2014. Thus if a Republican president took office in 2013, there was a real chance that he could dismantle, or at least strongly interfere with, the new framework for health care and financial regulations. And it was clear by 2010 that movement conservatives would make the repeal or collapse of both bills a litmus test for all Republicans in office.</p><p>But with President Obama’s victory last week, the core framework of Dodd-Frank, the financial reform bill he signed in 2010, will become the law of the land. The question now is how to best push it forward in the coming months and years.</p><p>The most sensible, immediate reform would be to give regulators the adequate resources necessary to do their jobs. The CFTC had its funding cut by both parties last year in a move that will make their crucial work even harder to accomplish. The GOP is aiming to remove the independent funding stream for the CFPB. Without decent resources, it is unlikely that financial reform will be carried out effectively.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/obamas_blueprint_for_strengthening_financial_reform/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/obamas_blueprint_for_strengthening_financial_reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JPMorgan and Credit Suisse settle with SEC for $417m</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/jp_morgan_and_credit_suisse_settle_with_sec_for_417m/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/jp_morgan_and_credit_suisse_settle_with_sec_for_417m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP Morgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The banks will settle charges over mortgage misdeeds without admitting wrongdoing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — JPMorgan Chase and Credit Suisse have agreed to pay a combined $417 million to settle federal civil charges of selling risky mortgage bonds to investors that the banks knew could fail ahead of the 2008 financial crisis.</p><p>The Securities and Exchange Commission says JP Morgan failed to tell investors that mortgages tied to the bonds were delinquent. And both banks failed to properly disclose practices that allowed them to profit while investors lost millions, the SEC says.</p><p>JPMorgan is paying $296.9 million. Credit Suisse will pay $120 million. The banks agreed to settle the charges without admitting or denying wrongdoing. The money will go to the investors, the SEC said.</p><p>It is the latest case against major financial firms for their conduct in the years preceding the 2008 crisis. When the real estate bubble burst, home values plunged and millions of people lost their homes. Investors who bought the securities backed by mortgages lost billions.</p><p>Robert Khuzami, the agency's enforcement director, said in a statement that inaccurate statements by banks in packaging and selling mortgage bonds "contributed greatly to the tremendous losses suffered by investors once the U.S. housing market collapsed."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/jp_morgan_and_credit_suisse_settle_with_sec_for_417m/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/jp_morgan_and_credit_suisse_settle_with_sec_for_417m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BNY Mellon reaches Madoff settlement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/bny_mellon_reaches_madoff_settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/bny_mellon_reaches_madoff_settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNY Mellon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponzi Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernie Madoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivy Asset Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The investment managers will pay $210 million for driving clients towards the Ponzi scheme]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Officials have reached a $210 million settlement with Ivy Asset Management, a BNY Mellon subsidiary that advised clients to invest with Wall Street multibillion-dollar swindler Bernard Madoff.</p><p>The settlement of lawsuits filed by the New York attorney general, U.S. Labor Department and private plaintiffs also provides for about $9 million in payments by other defendants. Combined with anticipated future payments from Madoff bankruptcy proceedings, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said it is expected to return nearly all of the original investments to those who were defrauded, including union pension funds from upstate New York.</p><p>"Ivy Asset Management violated its fundamental responsibility as an investment adviser by putting its own pecuniary interests ahead of the interests of its clients," Schneiderman said. "Ivy deliberately concealed negative facts it uncovered in its due diligence of Madoff in order to keep earning millions of dollars in fees. As a result, its clients suffered massive and avoidable losses."</p><p>Labor Secretary Hilda Solis said the agreement "provides a measure of justice for those Americans who worked hard to prepare for their retirement and then saw hoped-for stability disappear."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/bny_mellon_reaches_madoff_settlement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/bny_mellon_reaches_madoff_settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ugh, not Erskine Bowles for Treasury</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/ugh_not_erskine_bowles_for_treasury/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/ugh_not_erskine_bowles_for_treasury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erskine Bowles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Lew]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's on a short list to replace Timothy Geithner, but who really thinks he can bring accountability to Wall Street?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> By this point, it’s <a href="http://www.npr.org/2012/11/12/164934497/lew-bowles-rumored-to-replace-treasurys-geithner">clear</a> that former Clinton administration official and twice-failed North Carolina Senate candidate Erksine Bowles is on the short list to replace Tim Geithner as Treasury Secretary. For reasons outlined by Paul Krugman, and our own Robert Kuttner, Bowles would be a terrible choice for Treasury: He’s a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/filling-geithners-small-s_b_1908111.html">deficit scold</a> more concerned with <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/12/opinion/krugman-hawks-and-hypocrites.html?hp">lowering taxes</a> than reducing unemployment and providing a strong base for economic growth.</p><p>But he has his advocates, among them William Cohan, a former investment banker and investigative journalist. Cohan sees the deficit as the chief problem facing the United States, and <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-11/an-obama-economic-team-to-sweep-wall-street-clean.html">thinks</a> Bowles is the only candidate for Treasury who can craft a bipartisan deal to get our “fiscal house in order” and bring some accountability to Wall Street.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/ugh_not_erskine_bowles_for_treasury/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/ugh_not_erskine_bowles_for_treasury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy gets into the debt market</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/occupy_gets_into_the_debt_market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/occupy_gets_into_the_debt_market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolling Jubilee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Loan Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Mangum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13067257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new project to buy up and forgive thousands of dollars worth of debt is, at the very least, pretty clever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time last year, Occupy Wall Street participants were regularly storming through Lower Manhattan, snaking around the financial district and beyond in boisterous marches and defending their Zuccotti Park home base in tense street battles with the NYPD. Twelve months later, Occupy is pouring energy into buying up debt bonds.</p><p>It's not incongruent.</p><p><a href="http://rollingjubilee.org/">The Rolling Jubilee</a> -- borne of Occupy offshoot group Strike Debt -- is best considered one among many Occupy tactics that aim to challenge or disrupt our current socio-political economic conditions. And as far as tactics go, this one is pretty clever. The idea is this: Occupy plans to buy up distressed debt -- debt which is in default -- and then forgive it (or, "abolish" it, as the ever-dramatic Occupy parlance puts it). Banks sell on distressed debts at pennies on the dollar (since the debts are in default, they're not making money off them and prefer to get rid of them). There are a number of websites where anyone can go and then buy this discharged, cheap debt. So, you or I or Occupy could buy $16,000 worth of debt for just $500 and then either make a profit by recovering the difference or just cancel it. Occupy and Strike Debt plan to do the latter on a large scale.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/occupy_gets_into_the_debt_market/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/occupy_gets_into_the_debt_market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Wall Street be punished?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/they_bet_and_lost_will_wall_street_be_punished/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/they_bet_and_lost_will_wall_street_be_punished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bankers are whining big-time. Their favorite son lost, and their chief enemy won. Here's what needs to happen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is ready to shed a tear for Wall Street? The moguls bet big, and lost. Now, if we are to believe their whining, they are preparing to pay the piper.</p><p>“We played the old Beatles song ‘The Taxman,’ on our trading floor this morning,” bond fund uber-manager Bill Gross <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-08/wall-street-trades-foiled-romney-dreams-for-bowles-hope.html,">told Bloomberg on Thursday.</a></p><p>Oh lordy, hard times are coming!</p><p>Although, you know, those times might not be quite so hard as the days back in the mid-'60s when George Harrison felt himself compelled to complain about a <em>95 percent</em> "super tax." If, during the negotiations to avoid the "fiscal cliff," President Obama plays a level of hardball that was in short supply for most of his first term, the wealthiest Wall Streeters <em>might</em> see a return to Clinton-era income tax rates on the rich. Anything more meaningful, like a hike in the tax rate on capital gains, or an end to the exemption for <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/08/15/what-is-the-carried-interest-loophole-and-why-doesnt-romney-want-to-close-it/">carried interest,</a> will require a major breakthrough -- successfully bashing through the obstructionism of House Republicans who seem unlikely to accede to any elements of Obama's agenda, no matter how forcefully the president seeks them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/they_bet_and_lost_will_wall_street_be_punished/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/they_bet_and_lost_will_wall_street_be_punished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election night was a &#8220;rebuke of Neanderthal attitudes&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/michael_moore_election_night_was_a_rebuke_to_neanderthals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/michael_moore_election_night_was_a_rebuke_to_neanderthals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As one of our nation's most vocal critics, I was proud to wake up in America on Wednesday morning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> This country has truly changed, and I believe there will be no going back. Hate lost yesterday. That is amazing in and of itself. And all the women who were elected last night! <a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/must-read/michael-moore-tweets-about-war-women-election-day-2012" target="_blank">A total rebuke of Neanderthal attitudes.</a></p><p>Now the real work begins. Millions of us – the majority – must come together to insist that President Obama and the Democrats stand up and fight for the things we sent them there to do. Mr. President, do not listen to the pundits who today call for you to "compromise." No. You already tried that. It didn't work. You can compromise later if you need to, but please, no more beginning by compromising. And if the Republican House doesn't want to play ball, do a massive end run around them with one executive order after another – just like they have done and will do if given the chance again.</p><p>We have to have Obama's back. As he is blocked and attacked by the Right, we need to be there with him. We are the majority. Let's act like it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/michael_moore_election_night_was_a_rebuke_to_neanderthals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/michael_moore_election_night_was_a_rebuke_to_neanderthals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three key Democratic takeaways from Election 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/three_key_democratic_takeaways_from_election_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/three_key_democratic_takeaways_from_election_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13061707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regardless of who wins, Democrats should take these lessons to heart if they want to shape America's future]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not too early to draw some lessons. Regardless of what happens Tuesday, Democrats should have three big takeaways from the 2012 election.</p><p><strong>Lesson One: Democrats Can Own the Future.</strong></p><p>Latinos, African-Americans, young people, and women have become the major Democratic voting blocs. That’s good news for Democrats because the first three constitute a growing percentage of the voting population (young people eventually become the entire voting population), while women continue to gain economic ground.</p><p>The challenge for Democrats will be to hold these groups in the future. All have been attracted to the Democratic Party in recent years mainly because Republican policies have turned them off – policies like the GOP’s draconian responses to undocumented workers, its eagerness to slash Medicaid and food stamps, its misogynistic approach to abortion, and its demand to cut federal spending on education and student loans.</p><p>But if Democrats want to keep their loyalty over the long term, the Party will need to do more than rely on Republican electoral stupidity. After all, the GOP might learn it has to become (or appear to become) more inclusive.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/three_key_democratic_takeaways_from_election_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/three_key_democratic_takeaways_from_election_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get ready for the phony debt fight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/get_ready_for_the_phony_debt_fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/get_ready_for_the_phony_debt_fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign to fix the debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13055187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both candidates agree: The national debt is the most urgent challenge facing the nation. But it's not -- at all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is almost certain to be a renewed push for cutting the budget regardless of who wins the election. This is a big part of Romney's and the GOP’s agenda. However, President Obama has also indicated a willingness to cut most areas of spending, including Social Security and Medicare, as part of a “Grand Bargain.”</p><p>In this context, the decision of a group of corporate CEOs to form a new group, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-10-26/ceos-back-debt-concepts-broad-enough-to-please-both-sides">the Campaign to Fix the Debt</a>, to push for a budget deal can be seen as a big deal. This group brings back memories of a 1970s TV ad that featured a middle-aged man wearing a bad toupee pushing totally fake-looking toupees. The narrator assured viewers that no one would recognize that these toupees were not your real hair saying, “I wouldn’t lie to you, I’m the president of the company.”</p><p>It’s hard not to think of this ad when listening to the<a href="http://www.fixthedebt.org/"> agenda being pushed</a> by the Campaign to Fix the Debt. This is yet another project supported by Wall Street investment banker Peter Peterson. For the last two decades Peterson has used his fortune to bankroll a number of organizations that were ostensibly pushing fiscal responsibility, but always had the same punch line: cut Social Security and Medicare.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/get_ready_for_the_phony_debt_fight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/get_ready_for_the_phony_debt_fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>