<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 19:29:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Unclaimed&#8221; charts search for forgotten Vietman vet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/unclaimed_charts_search_for_forgotten_vietman_vet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/unclaimed_charts_search_for_forgotten_vietman_vet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unclaimed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hartley Robertson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A film posits that U.S. soldier John Hartley Robertson, declared dead in 1968, is still alive in Vietnam UPDATED]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: The identity of the main claiming to be Robertson has been <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/tale_of_lost_vietnam_vet_reunited_with_family_in_unclaimed_deemed_false/">revealed to be Dang Tan Ngoc</a>, a Vietnamese citizen who has also impersonated other Vietnam vets.</p><p>Filmmaker Michael Jorgensen has charted a remarkable journey with Vietnam vet Tom Faunce in the documentary "Unclaimed," which aims to reconnect a U.S. Vietnam war vet, reported dead in 1968, with his American family.</p><p>The man, whom Faunce believes to be Special Forces Green Beret Master Sgt. John Hartley Robertson, remembers only that his helicopter was shot down in Laos in 1968 and that he had a wife and children in Alabama. Though presumed dead by Americans, the man says that he survived a year of torture in Vietnam and then married the nurse who cared for him.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/movies/2013/04/25/hot_docs_premiere_unclaimed_finds_a_vietnam_veteran_left_behind_for_44_years.html">Toronto Star</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/unclaimed_charts_search_for_forgotten_vietman_vet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/unclaimed_charts_search_for_forgotten_vietman_vet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ExxonMobil sued for allegedly brutalizing Indonesians</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/exxonmobil_sued_for_allegedly_brutalizing_indonesians_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/exxonmobil_sued_for_allegedly_brutalizing_indonesians_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exxonmobil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Villagers claim the company is responsible for human rights abuses committed by the Indonesian military]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LHOKSEUMAWE, Aceh — Syukri A-Wahap still bears scars from the two days he spent tied to a chair at a military checkpoint here in northern <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/indonesia">Indonesia</a> in 2003.<br /> <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a><br /> Indonesian soldiers who suspected he was aiding separatist rebels used their guns to try and beat a confession out of him. With the butt of an SS1 rifle they cracked his skull and busted his lower lip.</p><p>Syukri says he now suffers from short-term memory loss, pointing to a zigzag scar beneath a shock of thick, black hair.</p><p>“I didn’t feel anything,” he said, recalling the lengthy interrogations. “It felt like I was already dead.”</p><p>His story is one of thousands involving kidnap, torture, rape and murder at the hands of the Indonesian military, which some victims here say was aided by US oil giant ExxonMobil.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/exxonmobil_sued_for_allegedly_brutalizing_indonesians_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/exxonmobil_sued_for_allegedly_brutalizing_indonesians_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pretending to know about North Korea</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/no_one_knows_anything_about_north_korea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/no_one_knows_anything_about_north_korea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to know what's going on in the Korean peninsula? So does the entire American press]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's what I know about North Korea: Its tween dictator keeps saying he might have to nuke everyone if they don't stop bugging him and no one agrees on whether he has the ability to nuke anyone. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/pentagon-north-korea-could-have-nuclear-missile/2013/04/11/72230dea-a2eb-11e2-82bc-511538ae90a4_story.html">The Defense Intelligence Agency says</a> North Korea has "low reliability" missiles that could carry nuclear warheads. But that is not <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/04/11/obama-north-korea-belligerent/2075493/">the consensus view of the intelligence community</a>, according to other sources. Officially, the U.S. does not believe that North Korea could launch a nuclear armed missile. But, you never know! Seriously, you never know, because no one knows what North Korea is thinking and what it is capable of. That lack of knowledge does not stop our intrepid news-content creators, though!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/no_one_knows_anything_about_north_korea/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/no_one_knows_anything_about_north_korea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Jon Stewart on rising tensions between North Korea and U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_rising_tensions_between_north_korea_and_u_s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_rising_tensions_between_north_korea_and_u_s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Daily Show" host dismisses the threat, citing the nation's archaic methods of combat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart has a message for North Korea: "Your war-mongering's a little retro," mocking Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un's binoculars and the North Korean army's training exercises. </p><p>"Look, I don't know if you know this," says Stewart, "but we've moved on from that Patton thing. War is a little more modern, now."</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:424987" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-april-2-2013/nuke-kid-on-the-block---north-korean-threats">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision'>Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_rising_tensions_between_north_korea_and_u_s/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_rising_tensions_between_north_korea_and_u_s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s not being taught about the Iraq war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/what_are_kids_today_taught_about_the_iraq_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/what_are_kids_today_taught_about_the_iraq_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Textbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't blame the textbooks -- which can be surprisingly good. Teachers aren't encouraged to bring it up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon the 10th anniversary of America’s war in Iraq, a critical question with serious ramifications has been little explored: What are our children being taught in schools about the conflict, as it passes from "current events" into history?</p><p>To answer this question, one obvious place to start is school textbooks. I looked at several of them, and was happily surprised. The books present a fairly complex and balanced view of the war in Iraq, avoiding the falsehoods and sugarcoating that has so often marred American history instruction. But textbooks only tell part of the story.</p><p>Just as important is what is actually emphasized in the classrooms, and the ability of teachers to engage in real inquiry. Unfortunately, a combination of school policies and judicial decisions have made it so that many kids learn little or nothing about what we have done in Iraq, or why we have done it.</p><p>I’m a professor of education and history, and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0674018605?tag=steinhardt-20&amp;camp=0&amp;creative=0&amp;linkCode=as1&amp;creativeASIN=0674018605&amp;adid=1RCBBJCF771CKYQXQMCE&amp;">wrote a book</a> examining conflicts over history in American public schools. But for me, this probe is more than theoretical: My daughter is an 11th grader in a suburban public high school, where she takes Advanced Placement U.S. History.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/what_are_kids_today_taught_about_the_iraq_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/what_are_kids_today_taught_about_the_iraq_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Iraq reconstruction wasted over $8 billion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/u_s_iraq_reconstruction_wasted_over_8_billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/u_s_iraq_reconstruction_wasted_over_8_billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIGIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconstruction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13220604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Failures in accountability marred reconstruction of the country the U.S. invaded and poured billions into]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ten-year anniversary of the Iraq invasion looms, carrying with it a legacy of unjustified occupation and botched reconstruction. As <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/03/iraq-waste/">Spencer Ackerman at Wired </a>points out Wednesday, of the $60 billion the U.S. poured into reconstruction efforts,"$8 billion of that money wasted outright." These are not Ackerman's estimations -- these were the numbers given by Stuart Bowen, the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR), whose office released a "mammoth" report on Iraqi reconstruction programs "which cost the U.S. taxpayers, on average, $15 million every day from 2003 to 2012."</p><p>Bowen admits that the amount of "outright" waste probably far tops the $8 billion estimate. As Ackerman notes:</p><blockquote><p>We couldn’t look at every project — that’s impossible — but our audits show a lack of accountability,” Bowen says. “We are not well structured to carry out stability and reconstruction operations.” That isn’t nearly the whole story of the Iraq War’s expense. Bowen is only looking at reconstruction money, not the cost of <em>military</em> operations in Iraq, which totaled over $800 billion.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/u_s_iraq_reconstruction_wasted_over_8_billion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/u_s_iraq_reconstruction_wasted_over_8_billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World peace should be a priority again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/world_peace_should_be_a_priority_again_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/world_peace_should_be_a_priority_again_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13206506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data suggests that wars between countries are now rare, leading to an emerging "decline-in-violence" proposition]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a></p><p>CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — The very phrase “world peace” has become something of a synonym for naiveté. Yet in recent years, compelling evidence has emerged to suggest that at least one important aspect of world peace, the absence or rarity of war between countries, may in fact be close to a reality.</p><p>Scholarly work on what might be called the “decline-in-violence” phenomenon emerged following the conclusion of a surprisingly peaceful Cold War, but it has lately drawn greater popular and scholarly attention.</p><p>In a world replete with dangers, the decline-in-violence proposition is often treated with skepticism. But it is time for the international security community to think seriously about preparing for a durable world peace instead of the constant threat of world war.</p><p>To be clear, we cannot expect a violence-free world any time soon. Instead, the data suggest that certain kinds of violence, most notably inter-state warfare such as the two world wars, are becoming less common even as other forms of conflict increase.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/world_peace_should_be_a_priority_again_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/world_peace_should_be_a_priority_again_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing Africa to the OMG crowd</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/introducing_africa_to_the_omg_crowd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/introducing_africa_to_the_omg_crowd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everyday Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13188006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I balked when Instagram picked our feed. Now I realize it's an incredible way to reach the people we usually can't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, Instagram added <a href="http://web.stagram.com/n/everydayafrica/">Everyday Africa</a> (<a href="http://everydayafrica.tumblr.com/">Tumblr</a>) – a project I co-created with writer Austin Merrill to showcase daily life from across the continent – to its list of suggested users. I had been idly watching our followers the day it happened. We were at 990, and I was hoping we would finally hit 1,000. Suddenly, it jumped to nearly a new follower every minute. By the time we finished our two-week stint on the list, we had 17,000 pairs of eyes watching us. (After taking over the New Yorker's <a href="http://statigr.am/newyorkermag">Instagram account</a> this week, we gained another thousand plus).</p><p>Before our newfound popularity, most of our followers came from photography and NGO circles; most of our “likers” and “commenters” were people I knew or knew of. They commented with things like “great portrait,” shared their own African memory, or remarked on technical aspects of the pictures. Now, our followers are complete strangers of a demographic I can only guess at, with handles like “bieber_fever_2000” and “cuteeeelinda91.” The comments now have words (if we can call them that) like “OMG” and “adorbs.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/introducing_africa_to_the_omg_crowd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/introducing_africa_to_the_omg_crowd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the Hagel hearings mean</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/what_the_hagel_hearings_mean/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/what_the_hagel_hearings_mean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13187056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last best chance for the truth about a lost war and America's war-making future]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He’s been battered by big-money conservative groups looking to derail his bid for secretary of defense. Critics say he wants to end America’s nuclear program. They claim he’s anti-Israel and soft on Iran. So you can expect intense questioning -- if only for theatrical effect -- about all of the above (and undoubtedly then some) as Chuck Hagel faces his Senate confirmation hearings today.</p><p>You can be sure of one other thing: Hagel’s military service in Vietnam will be mentioned -- and praised. It’s likely, however, to be in a separate and distinct category, unrelated to the pointed questions about current issues like defense priorities, his beliefs on the use of force abroad, or the Defense Department’s role in counterterrorism operations. You can also be sure of this: no senator will ask Chuck Hagel about his presence during the machine-gunning of an orphanage in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta or the lessons he might have drawn from that incident.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/what_the_hagel_hearings_mean/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/what_the_hagel_hearings_mean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women in combat: The best worst reactions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/women_in_combat_the_best_worst_reactions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/women_in_combat_the_best_worst_reactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in combat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy Seals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, the Pentagon announced it would lift a ban on women in combat. Today, conservatives lost their minds]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been less than 24 hours since the Pentagon announced they would <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/panetta-opens-combat-roles-women" target="_blank">remove the longstanding military ban on women</a> in combat, and our friends on the Right wasted no time in going off the rails crazy about it. Apparently, lifting the ban on women in combat is the worst thing that's ever happened to the military. (At least since the <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/dont_ask_dont_tell/" target="_blank">last worst thing</a> that's ever happened to the military.)</p><p>A round up featuring the very best of the very worst.</p><p><strong>Heather Mac Donald of the National Review</strong></p><p>The Pentagon must think we are done fighting "real wars." Why else would they <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/338613/wrong-women-warriors-heather-mac-donald#" target="_blank">let women play army</a>?</p><blockquote><p>We have apparently arrived at the Golden Age, free from strife and the threat of foreign enemies. Little else can explain so gratuitous a decision as to place women in combat units.</p></blockquote><p>And there will be so much military sex happening! (As we know, things are uncomfortable enough with the <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/dont_ask_dont_tell/" target="_blank">gays hanging around</a>.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/women_in_combat_the_best_worst_reactions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/women_in_combat_the_best_worst_reactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taliban unimpressed by Prince Harry&#8217;s remarks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/taliban_unimpressed_by_prince_harrys_remarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/taliban_unimpressed_by_prince_harrys_remarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Harry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monarchy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["He doesn’t have the brain to know there is a war here” said Taliban after prince compared war to video games]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taliban spokesman "Zabiullah Mujahid" (thought to represent a number of militants in Afghanistan) has barbed Prince Harry's recent comments about serving in the British military.</p><p>"He doesn’t have the brain to know there is a war here,” the spokesman<a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/22/taliban-retaliates-after-prince-harry-compares-fighting-to-video-games/"> told the Guardian</a> in response to questions about comments from Capt. Wales' (Harry's military title).</p><p>Harry admitted publicly to killing people while he was a co-pilot in an Apache helicopter and, somewhat callously, chalked his skills up to practice with video games. "It’s a joy for me because I’m one of those people who loves playing PlayStation and Xbox, so with my thumbs I like to think I’m probably quite useful," he said.</p><p>“I think he has a mental problem; that’s why he is saying it is a game,” the Mujahid said, expressing disbelief that the prince had engaged in real warfare. “I don’t believe that he participated in the fighting,” said the spokesman. “Maybe he has seen the <em>mujahideen</em> in a movie, but that’s it.”</p><p>The prince's comments were made during a recently completed 20-week deployment as a gunner in a British Apache helicopter:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/c_8enZAQ12s" frameborder="0" width="448" height="232"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/taliban_unimpressed_by_prince_harrys_remarks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/taliban_unimpressed_by_prince_harrys_remarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Pacific the site of America&#8217;s next war?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/is_the_pacific_the_site_of_americas_next_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/is_the_pacific_the_site_of_americas_next_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13178353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escalating tensions among China, Japan and the U.S. could ignite armed conflict -- and sink the global economy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t look now, but conditions are deteriorating in the western Pacific.  Things are turning ugly, with consequences that could prove deadly and spell catastrophe for the global economy.</p><p>In Washington, it is widely assumed that a showdown with Iran over its nuclear ambitions will be the first major crisis to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/whitehouse/obama-picks-chuck-hagel-as-next-defense-secretary-setting-up-likely-confirmation-fight/2013/01/07/2dc9e916-58a4-11e2-b8b2-0d18a64c8dfa_print.html" target="_blank">engulf</a> the next secretary of defense -- whether it be former Senator Chuck Hagel, as President Obama desires, or someone else if he fails to win Senate confirmation.  With few signs of an imminent breakthrough in talks aimed at peacefully resolving the Iranian nuclear issue, many analysts believe that military action -- if not by Israel, than by the United States -- could be on this year’s agenda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/is_the_pacific_the_site_of_americas_next_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/is_the_pacific_the_site_of_americas_next_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama misleads over end to war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/obama_misleads_about_an_end_to_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/obama_misleads_about_an_end_to_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadow War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13177823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his inaugural address, the president hailed end to decade of war, while apparatus for perpetual war is cemented]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his inauguration address Monday, President Obama proclaimed that a “decade of war is now ending.” Mere hours earlier, a U.S. drone <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/yemen-us-drone-strike-kills-al-qaida-militants-18269140">dropped missiles</a> over Yemen, killing two al-Qaida militants as part of an intensified airstrike campaign which began last month.</p><p>It has been well-established in reports (like those from the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-drone-strikes-will-get-pass-in-counterterrorism-playbook-officials-say/2013/01/19/ca169a20-618d-11e2-9940-6fc488f3fecd_story.html">Washington Post</a>'s Greg Miller) that the Obama administration has set up a national security apparatus ensuring, contra the president's words Monday, a perpetual war. Obama's speech may have been referring to the withdrawal of troops form Iraq or the winding down of U.S. military leadership in Afghanistan, but an increasingly militarized CIA and the perpetuation of shadow wars in Yemen and Somalia, to name just two, let alone the U.S. funds and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/15/americas-arms-sales-bahrain-crackdown">arms sent around the world </a>to bolster or undermine regimes as U.S. interests dictate, make talk of ending war a semantic gamble at best.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/obama_misleads_about_an_end_to_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/obama_misleads_about_an_end_to_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia&#8217;s &#8220;Goan war&#8221; revealed to be a hoax</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/wikipedias_goan_war_revealed_to_be_a_hoax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/wikipedias_goan_war_revealed_to_be_a_hoax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hoax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13164450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The entry about a conflict between colonial Portugal and India's Maratha empire went undetected for five years ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It went undetected for five years on Wikipedia, but now a cleverly crafted entry about a 17th century conflict between colonial Portugal and India’s Maratha empire has been outed as a hoax. Think of all of the plagiarized world history papers that may have been compromised by this information!</p><p>Added to the site in 2007, the so-called Bicholim Conflict of 1640-41 was a fictitious war between the Portuguese rulers of Goa and India's imperial Maratha empire. The fabricated entry was uncovered by another user in December. "After careful consideration and some research, I have come to the conclusion that this article is a hoax — a clever and elaborate hoax," wrote user "ShelfSkewed."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/wikipedias_goan_war_revealed_to_be_a_hoax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/wikipedias_goan_war_revealed_to_be_a_hoax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assad outlines new Syria peace plan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/violence_in_syria_rages_ahead_of_assad_speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/violence_in_syria_rages_ahead_of_assad_speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/violence_in_syria_rages_ahead_of_assad_speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Syrian president ignored international demands calling for him to step down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEIRUT (AP) -- Syrian President Bashar Assad on Sunday outlined his vision for a road map to end nearly 22 months of violence in Syria but also struck a defiant tone, calling on his countrymen to unite against "murderous criminals" whom he said are carrying out a foreign plot seeking to tear the nation apart.</p><p>In a one-hour speech to the nation in which he appeared confident and relaxed, Assad ignored international demands for him to step down and said he is ready to hold a dialogue but only with those "who have not betrayed Syria." He offered a national reconciliation conference, elections and a new constitution but demanded regional and Western countries stop funding and arming rebels trying to overthrow him first.</p><p>The proposal, however, is unlikely to win acceptance from Syria's opposition forces, including rebels on the ground, who have repeatedly said they will accept nothing less than the president's departure, dismissing any kind of settlement that leaves him in the picture. On top of that, Assad's new initiative is reminiscent of symbolic changes and concessions that his government made earlier in the uprising, which were rejected at the time as too little too late.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/violence_in_syria_rages_ahead_of_assad_speech/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/violence_in_syria_rages_ahead_of_assad_speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US military deaths in Afghanistan top 2,000</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/us_military_deaths_in_afghanistan_top_2000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/us_military_deaths_in_afghanistan_top_2000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Enduring Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a result of the U.S.-led invasion, 2,043 troops have died since late 2001]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2012, at least 2,043 members of the U.S. military had died in Afghanistan as a result of the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in late 2001, according to an Associated Press count.</p><p>The AP count is the same as the Defense Department’s tally, last updated Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST.</p><p>At least 1,703 military service members have died in Afghanistan as a result of hostile action, according to the military’s numbers.</p><p>Outside of Afghanistan, the department reports at least 119 more members of the U.S. military died in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. Of those, 11 were the result of hostile action.</p><p>The AP count of total OEF casualties outside of Afghanistan is four more than the department’s tally.</p><p>The Defense Department also counts three military civilian deaths.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/us_military_deaths_in_afghanistan_top_2000/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/us_military_deaths_in_afghanistan_top_2000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret socialist or grand bargainer?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/what_will_obamas_second_term_look_like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/what_will_obamas_second_term_look_like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13059306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A second term would likely look familiar -- and again depend upon how Obama chooses to deal with the GOP House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would a second Barack Obama term look like? There are way too many variables to answer the question with any confidence. His conservative enemies have their terrifying visions: He'd go full-on New Black Panther Party, basically. (Or else he'd simply spend all his time in a glow of self-satisfaction, appearing <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/328757/would-second-term-obama-be-any-different">on "The View" constantly.</a>) But for liberals and leftists, the idea of a reelected Obama involves a lot of uncertainty. (Though we are also hoping for the secret socialist agenda thing, mostly.)</p><p>Will a reelected Obama simply hold down the fort, protecting the domestic achievements of his first term and working to block the excesses of an activist Republican Congress? Or will he be in Grand Bargain legacy-establishing mode, desperate to cut bipartisan deals on as many issues as possible? If his foreign anti-terror campaigns are shown to be inspiring the sorts of attitudes that cause people to become terrorists in the first place will he reconsider his strategy or will we continue to act as though we can kill each terrorist (and only each terrorist) in the world one by one until there aren't any anymore? Will Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton <em>finally switch jobs?</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/what_will_obamas_second_term_look_like/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/what_will_obamas_second_term_look_like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Youth and social networks are signs of radicalism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/youth_and_social_networks_are_signs_of_radicalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/youth_and_social_networks_are_signs_of_radicalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radicalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13028053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Going by a U.S. Army list, nearly everyone exhibits signs of a terrorist-in-the-making]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A U.S. Army list of warning signs for radicalization, obtained by Wired, gives the impression that it would be impossible to distinguish a normal U.S. solider from a budding young terror suspect.</p><p><a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/10/insider-threat/">Wired notes</a> some particularly vague "Risk Factors for Radicalization" among soldiers:</p><blockquote><p>“Youth,” which might be a difficult thing to mitigate against, unless the military wants to take former Pentagon official Rosa Brooks’ unorthodox recruitment advice. “Social Networks” is another, and it’s probably alarmingly coterminous with Youth. Still others: “Emotional Vulnerability,” “Personal Connection to a Grievance” and “Conflict at Work or at Home.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/youth_and_social_networks_are_signs_of_radicalism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/youth_and_social_networks_are_signs_of_radicalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Hobsbawm in quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/eric_hobsbawm_in_quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/eric_hobsbawm_in_quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Hobsbawm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13026856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The renowned Marxist historian died Monday morning, aged 95]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the early hours of Monday morning, celebrated British historian, staunch Marxist and public intellectual Eric Hobsbawm died at age 95.</p><p>Hobsbawm's ideas will long survive him, especially through his major works, "The Age of Revolution," "The Age of Capital," "The Age of Empire," "History of the 20th Century," "The Age of Extremes," which has been translated into 40 languages since its 1994 publication. Despite shifting trends in the academy, Hobsbawm stuck by his Marxist guns throughout. Here are a few of his thoughts on war, capital and nationhood:</p><p><strong>On war and capitalism:</strong></p><p>"War has been the most convenient pseudo-solution for the problems of twentieth-century capitalism. It provides the incentives to modernization and technological revolution which the market and the pursuit of profit do only fitfully and by accident, it makes the unthinkable (such as votes for women and the abolition of unemployment) not merely thinkable but practicable. What is equally important, it can re-create communities of men and give a temporary sense to their lives by uniting them against foreigners and outsiders. This is an achievement beyond the power of the private enterprise economy when left to itself." (The Observer Review, 1968.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/eric_hobsbawm_in_quotes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/eric_hobsbawm_in_quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US military deaths in Afghanistan hit 2,000</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/us_military_deaths_in_afghanistan_hit_2000_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/us_military_deaths_in_afghanistan_hit_2000_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kabul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13026111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The toll has climbed steadily in recent months with a spate of attacks by Afghan army and police]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — U.S. military deaths in the Afghan war have reached 2,000, a cold reminder of the human cost of an 11-year-old conflict that now garners little public interest at home as the United States prepares to withdraw most of its combat forces by the end of 2014.</p><p>The toll has climbed steadily in recent months with a spate of attacks by Afghan army and police — supposed allies — against American and NATO troops. That has raised troubling questions about whether countries in the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan will achieve their aim of helping the government in Kabul and its forces stand on their own after most foreign troops depart in little more than two years.</p><p>On Sunday, a U.S. official confirmed the latest death, saying that an international service member killed in an apparent insider attack by Afghan forces in the east of the country late Saturday was American. A civilian contractor with NATO and at least two Afghan soldiers also died in the attack, according to a coalition statement and Afghan provincial officials. The U.S. official spoke on condition of anonymity because the nationality of those killed had not been formally released. Names of the dead are usually released after their families or next-of-kin are notified, a process that can take several days. The nationality of the civilian was also not disclosed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/us_military_deaths_in_afghanistan_hit_2000_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/us_military_deaths_in_afghanistan_hit_2000_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>