<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > War on Drugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/war_on_drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Medical pot dispensaries to open in D.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/medical_pot_dispensaries_to_open_in_d_c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/medical_pot_dispensaries_to_open_in_d_c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the DoJ cracks down on medical marijuana nationwide, operators plan to open on its door step]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent months the Justice Department has overseen harsh crackdowns on medical marijuana dispensaries in states like California where the sale of the drug for medical purposes has been legalized. As <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/feds_threaten_medical_pot_dispensaries_with_40_year_sentences/">we noted</a> earlier this month, a U.S. attorney is threatening California landlords housing medical marijuana dispensaries with 40 years in federal prison. Now the DoJ will contend with medical marijuana on its doorstep, as dispensaries plan to open in D.C.. Under district law, the highly regulated dispensaries will be legal, but illegal under the federal system. The unusual and delicate interplay between district and federal policy in the capital leaves the question open as to whether feds will intervene with dispensaries as they have in other states. Dispensaries are expected to open at the end of this month</p><p>Via <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/05/13/191059/medical-marijuana-dispensary-to.html#.UZEL64JAuz4">McClatchy:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/medical_pot_dispensaries_to_open_in_d_c/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/medical_pot_dispensaries_to_open_in_d_c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds threaten medical pot dispensaries with 40-year sentences</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/feds_threaten_medical_pot_dispensaries_with_40_year_sentences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/feds_threaten_medical_pot_dispensaries_with_40_year_sentences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawful San Jose, Calif., dispensary has been ordered to vacate in latest federal crackdown to challenge state law]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest act in the ongoing drama pitting federal drug laws against state legislation permitting the sale of marijuana, a U.S. attorney is threatening the landlords housing medical marijuana dispensaries with 40 years in federal prison. After ballot measures legalizing the sale and possession of recreational pot use passed in Colorado and Washington state, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/war_on_drugs_beginning_of_the_end/">we wondered </a>whether Obama's second term would see the beginning of the end of the federal war on drugs.</p><p>But as the San Jose crackdown, among others, suggests, the Justice Department will not be backing down. In January, Southern California medical marijuana dispensary operator Aaron Sandusky was<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/09/aaron-sandusky-sentenced-marijuana-10-years-prison_n_2433827.html"> sentenced to 10 years</a> in federal prison for running a business deemed legal in his state since California legalized marijuana for qualified patients, caregivers and collectives in 1996 and 2003. Now, as<a href="http://www.eastbayexpress.com/LegalizationNation/archives/2013/04/30/breaking-news-san-jose-dispensary-landlords-threatened-with-40-years-prison-as-feds-marijuana-crackdown-continues"> the East Bay Express reported</a>, "a new round of actions against lawful medical cannabis dispensaries in the South Bay" has begun following crackdowns in 2011:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/feds_threaten_medical_pot_dispensaries_with_40_year_sentences/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/feds_threaten_medical_pot_dispensaries_with_40_year_sentences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug war and mass incarceration, by the numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/drug_war_and_mass_incarceration_by_the_numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/drug_war_and_mass_incarceration_by_the_numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prison Industrial Complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana arrests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than half of federal prisoners have been incarcerated for drug crimes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to policy reform advocates the Drug Policy Alliance, combining state and local spending on everything from drug-related arrests to prison, the total cost of the drug war in this country adds up to at least $51 billion per year. "Over four decades, the group says, American taxpayers have dished out $1 trillion on the drug war," <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/08/drug-war-mass-incarceration_n_3034310.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">HuffPo reported</a> Monday.</p><p>Meanwhile, the U.S. boasts the highest incarceration rates in the entire world -- 2.2 million prisoners. Staggeringly more than half of all federal inmates are incarcerated for drug crimes. Via HuffPo:</p><blockquote><p>Despite more relaxed attitudes among the public at large toward non-violent offenses like marijuana use, the number of people in federal prison for drug offenses spiked from 74,276 in 2000 to 97,472 in 2010, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.</p> <p>The punishment falls disproportionately on people of color. Blacks make up 50 percent of the state and local prisoners incarcerated for drug crimes. Black kids are 10 times more likely to be arrested for drug crimes than white ones -- even though white kids are <a href="http://healthland.time.com/2011/11/07/study-whites-more-likely-to-abuse-drugs-than-blacks/" target="_hplink">more likely to abuse drugs</a>.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/drug_war_and_mass_incarceration_by_the_numbers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/drug_war_and_mass_incarceration_by_the_numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bryan Fischer: Pot use should be fined like a speeding ticket</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/bryan_fischer_pot_use_should_be_fined_like_a_speeding_ticket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/bryan_fischer_pot_use_should_be_fined_like_a_speeding_ticket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Robertson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Fischer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The social conservative suggested that people should not be jailed for using marijuana]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Rand Paul's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/rand_paul_we_shouldnt_jail_people_for_pot_use/">comments</a> that he opposes pot use but "I also don’t want to put people in jail who make a mistake," social conservative Bryan Fischer suggested that we should just be fining people for pot use, not sending them to jail.</p><p>In a tweet, Fischer, the Director of Issues Analysis for the American Family Association, wrote:</p><p>[embedtweet id="315835818637934592"]</p><p>Evangelical Pat Robertson also recently came out for changing marijuana policy: “I really believe we should treat marijuana the way we treat beverage alcohol,” he told the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/us/pat-robertson-backs-legalizing-marijuana.html?_r=0">New York Times</a>. “I’ve never used marijuana and I don’t intend to, but it’s just one of those things that I think: this war on drugs just hasn’t succeeded.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/bryan_fischer_pot_use_should_be_fined_like_a_speeding_ticket/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/bryan_fischer_pot_use_should_be_fined_like_a_speeding_ticket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul: We shouldn&#8217;t jail people for pot use</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/rand_paul_we_shouldnt_jail_people_for_pot_use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/rand_paul_we_shouldnt_jail_people_for_pot_use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though, he said, "I think even marijuana is a bad thing to do"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said that though he opposes drug use, he thinks that the penalties are too harsh and, "I don't want to put them in jail and ruin their lives."</p><p>Speaking on Fox News Sunday, Paul said that even the last two presidents used drugs at some point. "Look, the last two presidents could have conceivably been put in jail for their drug use and I really think - look what would've happened, it would've ruined their lives," he said. "They got lucky. But a lot of poor kids, particularly in the inner city, don't get lucky and they don't have good attorneys and they go to jail for some of these things and I think it's a big mistake."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/rand_paul_we_shouldnt_jail_people_for_pot_use/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/rand_paul_we_shouldnt_jail_people_for_pot_use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.N. development chief slams War on Drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/un_development_chief_slams_war_on_drugs_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/un_development_chief_slams_war_on_drugs_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Helen Clark, a former health minister, says criminalizing drugs has created more problems than it has solved]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" /></a></p><p><strong>Helen Clark</strong>, the head of the United Nations Development Program, has <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/15/us-un-drugs-idUSBRE92E01W20130315" target="_blank">publicly slammed</a> global strategies to combat drugs, claiming there is increasing evidence that "the war on drugs" has failed. The former prime minister of New Zealand urged Latin American leaders to develop new policies to tackle drugs, which she says should be addressed as a public health problem rather than criminalized. "I've been a health minister in my past and there's no doubt that the health position would be to treat the issue of drugs as primarily a health and social issue rather than a criminalized issue," she told <em>Reuters</em>. "Once you criminalize, you put very big stakes around. Of course, our world has proceeded on the basis that criminalization is the approach. To deal with drugs as a one-dimensional, law-and-order issue is to miss the point." Although she did not directly comment on US involvement in the drug war, her words have been widely interpreted as a criticism of US drug policy, which she later denied. "She was speaking about the negative effects the drug trade has had on development in some Latin American countries in the context of the Human Development Report," said UNDP spokeswoman <strong>Christina LoNigro</strong> in a statement.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/un_development_chief_slams_war_on_drugs_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/un_development_chief_slams_war_on_drugs_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missouri pot activism finds unusual ally: A veteran cop</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/missouri_pot_activism_finds_unusual_ally_a_veteran_cop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/missouri_pot_activism_finds_unusual_ally_a_veteran_cop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decriminalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sgt. Gary Wiegert, a Tea Party supporter, is pushing for decriminalization and his department is none too happy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the national epidemic of marijuana arrests disproportionately targeting young black and brown men, cops rarely appear favorably in marijuana reform stories. One veteran officer in Missouri has, however, struck out against the grain. As the local Fox affiliate <a href="http://fox2now.com/2013/03/08/st-louis-officer-lobbying-to-legalize-marijuana-lands-in-hot-water/">reported:</a></p><blockquote><p>Sergeant Gary Wiegert has been a city cop for 32 years. He’s twice been president of the St. Louis Police Officer’s Association. His other part-time job is as a lobbyist in Jefferson City. One of his clients is the St. Louis Tea Party. Another, is a group called Show-Me Cannibis Regulation, which is trying to decriminalize marijuana in Missouri.</p></blockquote><p>Wiegart's police department have not reacted well to his position on pot. "Sergeant Wiegert is not representing the department. His comments are his own and not what is expected of our officers,” the department chief said in a statement, explaining why the department was blocking Wiegart speaking to the media. Now, according to St. Louis Today, Wiegart has filed suit against the department for "allegedly stifling his pro-pot politicking."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/missouri_pot_activism_finds_unusual_ally_a_veteran_cop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/missouri_pot_activism_finds_unusual_ally_a_veteran_cop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In prison debate, race overshadows poverty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/prison_poverty_and_pot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/prison_poverty_and_pot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incarceration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The way to stop filling up prisons is to end the War on Drugs, curb inequality and change our perspective on class]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Racial discrimination is often used to explain the fact that 1 percent of American adults <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/28/us/28cnd-prison.html?_r=0">is behind bars</a> and that we're the only Western democracy not to have abolished the death penalty. Given that America’s prisoners are disproportionately black and Hispanic, this is understandable. But what's often overlooked is class -- even though the clear majority of white, black and Hispanic prisoners stems from the underclass and working class.</p><p>Criminal justice systems are largely a reflection of economic systems. It is no coincidence that their practices are the most humane in Scandinavian countries, known for their high degree of economic solidarity. In a society marked by sharp wealth inequality, such as modern-day America, the criminal justice system can come to negate solidarity and embody the notion that those at the bottom rungs of society are little more than a nuisance. Thus, the U.S. criminal justice system emphasizes harsh retribution, disfavors rehabilitation and tends to ignore social factors behind crime, such as poverty, failing public schools or lax gun control.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/prison_poverty_and_pot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/prison_poverty_and_pot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can an online market for meth, smack and pot win?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/can_an_ebay_for_meth_smack_and_pot_prevail_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/can_an_ebay_for_meth_smack_and_pot_prevail_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13213530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Internet marketplace for drugs called Silk Road is continuing to profit despite legal attempts to shut it down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a></p><p>ATLANTA — Senator Chuck Schumer called it "a certifiable one-stop shop" for meth, heroin and cocaine, "the most brazen attempt to peddle drugs online that we have ever seen."</p><p>That was in June 2011, just days after Gawker writer Adrian Chen <a href="http://gawker.com/5805928/the-underground-website-where-you-can-buy-any-drug-imaginable" target="_blank">outed the site, known as Silk Road</a>.</p><p>Schumer's outrage was palpable. He commanded Attorney General Eric Holder to shut down the clandestine marketplace.</p><p>But in the nearly two years that have passed, that apparently hasn't happened.</p><p>The site mysteriously disappeared for two weeks in November 2012, and its proprietor, alias Dread Pirate Roberts, went incommunicado from online forums. That led some to speculate that law enforcement had shut it down.</p><p>But the opposite now appears to be true.</p><p>Due to an explosion in popularity, Silk Road's infrastructure had to be rebuilt to accommodate new customers and security, Dread Pirate Roberts said in a post following his return. And performance measures were added to better protect users.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/can_an_ebay_for_meth_smack_and_pot_prevail_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/can_an_ebay_for_meth_smack_and_pot_prevail_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caltech physicist slams government on marijuana research</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/caltech_physicist_slams_government_on_marijuana_research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/caltech_physicist_slams_government_on_marijuana_research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientist: If all science ran like marijuana research is being run, creationists would oversee paleontology digs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late last week, in a speech at a medical marijuana conference flagged<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/02/25/1629721/caltech-physicist-if-all-science-were-run-like-marijuana-research-creationists-would-control-paleontology/"> by Think Progress</a>, Caltech theoretical physicist John H. Schwartz blasted the federal government's treatment of marijuana research. Schwartz described the Catch-22 situation set up by the "tag team" of the Drug Enforcement Administration and the National Institute on Drug Abuse: At the same time the government says there is insufficient research to change marijuana's designation from "a dangerous substance with no medical value," government bodies systematically block such research from taking place.</p><p>Think Progress cited passages from Schwartz's pointed remarks:</p><blockquote><p>The most blatant example of this behavior [from the government] came last year, when <strong><a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/marijuana-ptsd-study/">NIDA blocked an F</a></strong><a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/marijuana-ptsd-study/">DA-approved clinical trial</a> testing marijuana as a remedy for post traumatic stress disorder, PTSD. It’s especially sad to note that the study participants were veterans, with PTSD deemed untreatable by other means. After 12 years of war, this is how we treat them.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/caltech_physicist_slams_government_on_marijuana_research/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/caltech_physicist_slams_government_on_marijuana_research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank the War on Drugs for your Valentine&#8217;s Day roses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/are_your_valentines_day_roses_supporting_the_war_on_drugs_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/are_your_valentines_day_roses_supporting_the_war_on_drugs_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentines Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuador]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13201894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flower-selling was supposed to be an alternative to the cocaine industry. Instead, it's a source of exploitation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> <em>This article was published in partnership with </em><a href="http://globalpossibilities.org/"><em>GlobalPossibilities.org</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>When your love hands you a gorgeous bouquet of large, red, long-stemmed roses this Valentine’s Day, as any botanist will tell you, you’re getting a bunch of sex organs. Although the roses are more beautiful, fragrant and socially acceptable than other methods that might get the same point across (just ask former Congressman Anthony Weiner), there’s a lot more to those roses than meets the eye.</p><p>Unfortunately, the romancing of women in the United States often means the exploitation of women in countries like Colombia and Ecuador.</p><p>The preference the U.S. gives Colombian and Ecuadorian flower exports has a lot to do with another export from those nations: cocaine. By 1990, South American imports already accounted for more than 40 percent of roses sold in the United States. Then, in 1991, Congress passed the Andean Trade Preference Act. The idea was simple: maybe if we help cocaine-producing nations sell us other things, like roses, they’ll be less interested in selling us cocaine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/are_your_valentines_day_roses_supporting_the_war_on_drugs_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/are_your_valentines_day_roses_supporting_the_war_on_drugs_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dozens interested in pot consultancy gig</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/dozens_interested_in_pot_consultancy_gig/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/dozens_interested_in_pot_consultancy_gig/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13187125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would a felony conviction be a dealbreaker? It depends]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TACOMA — The job description requests an unlikely mix of skills: five years of regulatory experience, with a law degree preferred, and extensive knowledge of all things marijuana.</p><p><span style="font-size: 13px;">But that didn't stop dozens of people from turning out Wednesday — in flannel and suits, ponytails and hemp necklaces — to find out more about becoming Washington state's official marijuana consultant.</span></p><p>As officials figure out how to regulate the state's newly legal marijuana, they're hiring an adviser to fill in the gaps of the typical bureaucrat's education: how cannabis is best grown, dried, tested, labeled, packaged, regulated and cooked into brownies.</p><p>The Liquor Control Board, the agency charged with developing rules for the marijuana industry, reserved a convention center hall for a state bidding expert to take questions about the position and the hiring process.</p><p>"Since it's not unlikely with this audience, would a felony conviction preclude you from this contract?" asked Rose Habib, an analytical chemist from a marijuana testing lab in Missoula, Mont.</p><p>The answer: It depends. A pot-related conviction is probably fine, but a "heinous felony," not so much, responded John Farley, a procurement coordinator with the Liquor Control Board.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/dozens_interested_in_pot_consultancy_gig/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/dozens_interested_in_pot_consultancy_gig/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012: The year we all got high</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2012 was a "watershed" year for marijuana reform -- and not just in Washington and Colorado]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If liberalizing marijuana laws becomes the next big social issue, we will have 2012 to thank for it, as this was the year that the issue finally moved from the fringes to the center of American politics.</p><p>“In the now nearly fifty-year-old effort to end cannabis prohibition laws led by non-profit citizen advocacy groups, 2012 must be viewed as a watershed year for cannabis law reformers,” said Allen St. Pierre, the executive director of NORML, a leading marijuana reform group.</p><p>Tom Angell, the chairman of Marijuana Majority, agreed. "This was the year that we broke through and succeeded in getting prominent political observers and the media to pay attention to the fact that this is quickly becoming a mainstream issue.”</p><p>The biggest victories for advocates, of course, came in Washington and Colorado, where voters approved ballot measures to legalize cannabis for private recreational use. Washington’s law has already gone into effect, while Colorado’s will soon. Advocates hope that if all goes according to plan, other states will see there’s nothing to be afraid of and follow the example.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Texas GOP chair: Obama needs teleprompter &#8220;because he fried his brains on drugs&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/former_texas_gop_chair_obama_needs_teleprompter_because_he_fried_his_brains_on_drugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/former_texas_gop_chair_obama_needs_teleprompter_because_he_fried_his_brains_on_drugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cathie Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Texas GOP chairwoman Cathie Adams says marijuana legalization is a mistake. Just look at the president!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cathie Adams, the former head of the Texas Republican Party and current president of the conservative Texas Eagle Forum, thinks this country needs to be very careful about legalizing marijuana, because just look at Barack Obama: "Barack Hussein Obama has got to have a teleprompter because he fried his brain on drugs. It doesn't work."</p><p><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/cathie-adams-obama-needs-teleprompter-because-he-fried-his-brain-drugs">Right Wing Watch</a> first reported on Black's remarks, which were made at a Grassroots America We the People "Call to Action" meeting shortly before the election.</p><p>For starters, Adams argued that Obama is a Marxist, but no one is talking about it because it is hidden by his "green agenda," or something:</p><blockquote><p>Who is a Marxist in our White House?  Of course, it's Barack Hussein Obama.  And I don't know why we're not calling him what he is as a Marxist.  It's as if, when the wall fell that communism died; it didn't.  Today, it is green on the outside and red on the inside. It is as red as ever and Barack Obama is implementing his green agenda, which is Marxism, and that is exactly why our economy is hurting as badly as it is and why twenty three million people are still out of work. That is exactly what is happening.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/former_texas_gop_chair_obama_needs_teleprompter_because_he_fried_his_brains_on_drugs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/former_texas_gop_chair_obama_needs_teleprompter_because_he_fried_his_brains_on_drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado governor signs marijuana legalization into law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/colorado_governor_signs_marijuana_legalization_into_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/colorado_governor_signs_marijuana_legalization_into_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hickenlooper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colorado became the second state, after Washington, to allow recreational pot use]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DENVER (AP) -- Marijuana for recreational use became legal in Colorado Monday, when the governor took the procedural step of declaring the voter-approved change part of the state constitution.</p><p>Colorado became the second state after Washington to allow pot use without a doctor's recommendation. Both states prohibit public use of the drug, and commercial sales in Colorado and Washington won't be permitted until after regulations are written next year.</p><p>Hickenlooper, a Democrat, opposed the measure but had no veto power over the voter-approved amendment to the state constitution. He tweeted his declaration Monday and sent an executive order to reporters by email after the fact. That prevented a countdown to legalization as seen in Washington, where the law's supporters gathered to smoke in public.</p><p>"Voters were loud and clear on Election Day," Hickenlooper said in his statement. The law allowed him until Jan. 5 to declare marijuana legal.</p><p>Adults over 21 in Colorado may now possess up to an ounce of marijuana, or six plants. Public use and sale of the drug remain illegal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/colorado_governor_signs_marijuana_legalization_into_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/colorado_governor_signs_marijuana_legalization_into_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s make Obama regret his war on weed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's Justice Department won't let Washington and Colorado smoke up in peace. Can we change his mind?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama has pissed off the stoners again. He always does. In 2009 <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/26/obama-takes-pot-legalizat_n_179563.html">a question about marijuana legalization made him laugh</a>, a hard to miss sign that he didn't take the issue seriously. Worse than laughter has been his DEA, and its <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/27/inside-obama-s-war-on-weed.html">increasingly heavy-handed war on legal marijuana dispensaries.</a> Now that <em>recreational</em> marijuana has been legalized in Colorado and Washington, his Department of Justice is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/us/marijuana-initiatives-in-2-states-set-federal-officials-scrambling.html?_r=0">weighing its options</a>, and, reportedly, none of their options seem to be "just let people smoke their marijuana, because it's harmless."</p><p>Instead the feds are either looking to have a judge declare the state regulations invalid, or are out to browbeat states into recriminalizing the demon weed by withholding federal money. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Minimum_Drinking_Age_Act_of_1984">A similar strategy</a> got the drinking age raised to 21 in every state, though it required legislation.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 reasons addiction carries a stigma</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/8_reasons_addiction_carries_a_stigma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/8_reasons_addiction_carries_a_stigma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If addiction is a chronic brain disease, why do we still think it's a moral failing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" align="left" /></a> The American Society of Addiction Medicine <a href="http://www.asam.org/advocacy/find-a-policy-statement/view-policy-statement/public-policy-statements/2011/12/15/the-definition-of-addiction" target="_blank">characterizes</a> addiction as a “primary, chronic disease of brain reward, motivation, memory and related circuitry.” The National Institute on Drug Abuse defines addiction as a ‘chronic, relapsing brain disease” that changes the structure and functionality of the brain. So why do so many people still think of addiction as a moral failing? Why do they still refer to victims of substance misuse disorders as meth freaks, alcoholics, junkies, crackheads and garden-variety drunks?</p><p>The answer is simple as it is depressing: because that’s the way it’s always been. Addicts are scorned by communities and celebrities with addictions are exploited or hounded by paparazzi. And while the government purports to view addiction as a disease, it often works in opposition to that position through the “War on Drugs,” which counts most drug users as criminals. Even those of us in the treatment community still—consciously or unconsciously—employ stigmatizing programming and language—such as when we focus on “dirty” urine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/8_reasons_addiction_carries_a_stigma/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/8_reasons_addiction_carries_a_stigma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana legalization kicks in for Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/marijuana_legalization_kicks_in_for_washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/marijuana_legalization_kicks_in_for_washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crowds gathered at midnight in Seattle for celebratory joints, but the law is still under review]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marijuana legalization went into effect Thursday in Washington state and, according to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/06/legalizing-marijuana-washington-state_n_2249238.html">reports</a>, hundreds gathered under Seattle's Space Needle to spark up in unison as the clock struck midnight.</p><p>Last month, voters in Washington and Colorado <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/war_on_drugs_beginning_of_the_end/">chose to legalize </a>the possession of small amounts of marijuana to adults aged over 21. In both states licenses will be granted to pot growers and sellers to legally distribute the product, which, like alcohol and tobacco, will be taxed. Colorado's legalization measure is set to go into effect early next month. Smoking pot in public remains illegal in both states but, as the AP noted, there was "nary a police officer in sight" during the celebration early Thursday morning -- the Seattle Police Department told its 1,300 officers that until further notice they were not to issue citations for public marijuana use.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/marijuana_legalization_kicks_in_for_washington/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/marijuana_legalization_kicks_in_for_washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End the war on weed!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot Legalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defying federal law, two states just legalized marijuana. A popular campaign forces Obama to take a stance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decades-long fight to end the Drug War - and specifically, the absurd war on marijuana - received a huge boost in the 2012 election, as Colorado and Washington became the first states to vote to legalize and regulate cannabis. Following those historic votes, a <a href="http://www.argojournal.com/2012/11/poll-watch-rasmussen-r-survey-on.html">new poll</a> shows the vast majority of Americans want states - not the federal government - to decide for themselves whether to legalize pot. Meanwhile, California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) took to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/11/jerry-brown-marijuana-laws_n_2113760.html">national television</a> to amplify the message of that poll, demanding that the federal government to respect states whose voters have spoken.</p><p>The problem, of course, is that the Obama administration may cite the 1970 Controlled Substances Act as statutory rationale to try to force states to continue an expensive and inhumane war on weed that unnecessarily arrests and incarcerates thousands of Americans each year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>220 marijuana cases already dismissed in legalized Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/220_marijuana_cases_already_dismissed_in_legalized_washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/220_marijuana_cases_already_dismissed_in_legalized_washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana arrests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["There's no point continuing to seek criminal penalties," said prosecutor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less than a week ago, voters in Washington State approved the legalization of recreational marijuana use. Prosecutors in the state are already acting on the decision. Around 220 misdemeanor cases involving pot possession of less than one ounce by individuals over 21 (which will be legal under the new law) have already been dismissed in the Seattle area.</p><p>“Although the effective date of I-502 [the legalization bill] is not until December 6, there is no point in continuing to seek criminal penalties for conduct that will be legal next month,” King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg told <a href="http://blogs.seattletimes.com/politicsnorthwest/2012/11/09/175-marijuana-prosecutions-in-king-county-dismissed-because-of-initiative-502/">the Seattle Times</a>, adding “I think when the people voted to change the policy, they weren’t focused on when the effective date of the new policy would be. They spoke loudly and clearly that we should not treat small amounts of marijuana as an offense."</p><p>According to the Seattle Times, "Satterberg is the first prosecutor to change charging policy after I-502, but other prosecutors are also considering these cases. Tom McBride of the Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys said his office 'just starting to work through those issues.'"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/220_marijuana_cases_already_dismissed_in_legalized_washington/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/220_marijuana_cases_already_dismissed_in_legalized_washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
