<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > War on Terror</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/war_on_terror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:31:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon officials: Drone War on Terror is endless</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/pentagon_official_drone_policy_should_remain_for_at_least_20_years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/pentagon_official_drone_policy_should_remain_for_at_least_20_years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aumf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Congressional hearing, Defense officials defend AUMF and the boundless war-waging powers it grants]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a Congressional hearing Thursday on drone strikes carried out by the military, senior defense official Michael Sheehan admitted that the War on Terror is one without end or boundary. The assistant defense secretary told the Senate Armed Services Committee that U.S. military operations against al-Qaida and associated forces "is going to go on for quite a while... beyond the second term of the president. . . . I think it’s at least 10 to 20 years.”</p><p>Sheehan's remarks served as a defense of the military's current drone strike policy. While the majority of U.S. drone strikes are carried out by the CIA and authorized by the president directly, the Pentagon oversees strikes in Pakistan and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/cia_may_lose_drone_program/">will take increasing control of U.S. drone programs</a>. Sheehan also defended the current structure of the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Act (AUMF), passed after 9/11, which, in its present iteration, grants the president wide-ranging powers to wage drone wars. “At this point we’re comfortable with the AUMF as it is currently structured,” said Sheehan. He admitted that there was no expiration date or geographic boundary to the War on Terror.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/pentagon_official_drone_policy_should_remain_for_at_least_20_years/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/pentagon_official_drone_policy_should_remain_for_at_least_20_years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guantánamo: It&#8217;s Obama&#8217;s disgrace now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guantanamo hunger strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunger Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13289365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, Bush created this nightmare -- but the current hunger-strike crisis stems from Obama's political cowardice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time, in the long-ago days of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, we may have had the worst and most abusive presidential administration in the history of the United States, but at least there was some moral clarity. You were on their side or you weren’t; you either bought into the idea that the <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/war_on_terror">“war on terror”</a> was a special set of circumstances that required an immense expansion of executive power and the indefinite suspension of constitutional norms, or you didn’t. Nothing quite symbolized that division like the military detention camp at <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/guantanamo_bay">Guantánamo Bay,</a> Cuba. It was a locked-down and secretive facility in a country that didn’t want us there, where hooded and manacled men – in theory, the most violent and dangerous anti-American militants on the planet – were kept under mysterious conditions, denied the rights we routinely accord to suspected murderers and rapists, and subjected to interrogations we didn’t want to know about.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Reluctant Fundamentalist&#8221;: Is the Princeton grad a jihadi?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/the_reluctant_fundamentalist_is_the_princeton_grad_a_jihadi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/the_reluctant_fundamentalist_is_the_princeton_grad_a_jihadi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mira Nair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Reluctant Fundamentalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riz Ahmed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Riz Ahmed plays a financial genius turned Islamic intellectual in Mira Nair's "The Reluctant Fundamentalist"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who show up for <a href="http://www.ifcfilms.com/uncategorized/the-reluctant-fundamentalist">“The Reluctant Fundamentalist”</a> expecting an exotic and morally murky thriller about terrorism, somewhat in the “Homeland” and “Zero Dark Thirty” vein, will get it – at least for a while. No doubt it would be good for business if I told you that Mira Nair’s film, adapted from a novel by Mohsin Hamid, was about an American-educated young man who turns to violent radicalism. But this story only seems to be about that, and not for long. “The Reluctant Fundamentalist” begins with a classic opening sequence of misdirection and disorientation, in which we see an American academic kidnapped off the streets of Lahore, Pakistan, while a handsome young Pakistani receives text messages and photos that seem to link him to the crime. All this bewildering night action is set to a hypnotic traditional Pakistani folk tune, performed live in the street around a bonfire.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/the_reluctant_fundamentalist_is_the_princeton_grad_a_jihadi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/the_reluctant_fundamentalist_is_the_princeton_grad_a_jihadi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Boston, our bloated surveillance state didn&#8217;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/in_boston_our_bloated_surveillance_state_didnt_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/in_boston_our_bloated_surveillance_state_didnt_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13277976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beefed-up expenditures and laws failed to stop the Boston bombing, and did little to help capture the suspects]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The subtext of the official state view and media coverage coming out of Boston over the last week carried a crucial message to the American public: It was a vindication of the Counter-Terrorism Surveillance State and its massive expenditures and the associated erosion of American constitutional liberties.</p><p>To that end, the several days since the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/19/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-captured_n_3118187.html" target="_blank">bombing</a> of the Boston Marathon showcased a mesmerizing display of reality television mediated by the unquestioning officiousness of the fourth estate. On vivid display was “proof through performance,” a validation that the laws passed and massive expenditures incurred over the last decade were essential to the state’s “<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/boston-bombing-lockdown-suspect-search-90364.html" target="_blank">protection of the public</a>.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/in_boston_our_bloated_surveillance_state_didnt_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/in_boston_our_bloated_surveillance_state_didnt_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guantánamo prisoners exert their final leverage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/guantanamo_prisoners_exert_their_final_leverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/guantanamo_prisoners_exert_their_final_leverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunger Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prisoners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[koran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why their hunger strike should not just remind us of their humanity -- but reawaken our own]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, Olga Khazan, the Atlantic’s global editor, wrote a <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/04/why-the-guantanamo-bay-hunger-strikes-probably-wont-work/274561/" target="_blank">piece</a> doubting the effectiveness of the hunger strike being led by Guantánamo detainees since <a href="http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/04/02/the-guantanamo-hunger-strike-through-the-eyes-of-british-prisoner-shaker-aamer/" target="_blank">Feb. 7</a>. The strike, begun in protest against the prisoners’ Qurans being rifled, has taken on a much larger significance: It is a protest against the continual incarceration and brutalization of the prisoners, some of whom have been there, without being charged, since the opening of the prison 11 years ago. The actual number of strikers varies, depending upon who is reporting. Last Monday, there were officially <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/01/guantanamo-hunger-strike_n_2993828.html" target="_blank">39 strikers</a>, with 11 being force-fed nutritional supplements through their noses. As of Thursday, the U.S. military has <a href="http://rt.com/news/41-prisoners-gitmo-strike-440/" target="_blank">upped</a> the official number to 41. The lawyer for Shaker Amer, one of the detainees participating in the hunger strike since it began, reports that there are <a href="http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/04/02/the-guantanamo-hunger-strike-through-the-eyes-of-british-prisoner-shaker-aamer/" target="_blank">130 strikers</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/guantanamo_prisoners_exert_their_final_leverage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/guantanamo_prisoners_exert_their_final_leverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Over 100 Guantanamo detainees on hunger strike</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/over_100_guantanamo_detainees_on_hunger_strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/over_100_guantanamo_detainees_on_hunger_strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunger Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[koran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[center for constitutional rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prisoners' attorneys claim that inmates refusing food after reported interference with effects including Korans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over 100 detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison camp have reportedly gone on hunger strike following the alleged desecration by guards of personal effects including copies of the Koran. According to reports from detainees' attorneys, the strike is into its third week.</p><p>Pardiss Kebriaei, a lawyer representing Ghaleb Al-Bihani, a Yemeni detainee, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hpY5OmopV1m_tjZay9NgxU0xS_3A?docId=CNG.d020626bc76fcfeaf41ef7afea39d95e.181">told Agence France-Presse</a>, "My client and other men have reported that most of the detainees in Camp 6 are on strike, except for a small few who are elderly or sick."</p><p>Robert Durand, director of public affairs for the Joint Task Force Guantanamo, has however denied claims of a mass hunger strike. He told AFP that although the detainees are refusing to take the meals delivered, they continue to eat food kept in their cell blocks."Refusing delivered food does not make a detainee a hunger striker, not eating does," said Durand, noting that nine detainees were engaged in hunger strikes, five of whom were being fed through tubes inserted into their stomachs.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/over_100_guantanamo_detainees_on_hunger_strike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/over_100_guantanamo_detainees_on_hunger_strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The global war on terror&#8217;s forgotten victims: Women and children</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_global_war_on_terrors_forgotten_victims_children_and_spouses_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_global_war_on_terrors_forgotten_victims_children_and_spouses_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lost in the discussion of the war's civilian targets is the suffering their families are forced to endure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once, as a reporter, I covered wars, conflicts, civil wars, and even a genocide in places like Vietnam, Angola, Eritrea, Rwanda, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, keeping away from official briefings and listening to the people who were living the war. In the years since the Bush administration launched its Global War on Terror, I’ve done the same thing without ever leaving home.</p><p>In the last decade, I didn’t travel to distant refugee camps in Pakistan or destroyed villages in Afghanistan, nor did I spend time in besieged cities like Iraq’s Fallujah or Libya’s Misrata. I stayed in Great Britain. There, my government, in close conjunction with Washington, was pursuing its own version of what, whether anyone cared to say it or not, was essentially a war against Islam. Somehow, by a series of chance events, I found myself inside it, spending time with families transformed into enemies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_global_war_on_terrors_forgotten_victims_children_and_spouses_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_global_war_on_terrors_forgotten_victims_children_and_spouses_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What about foreign nationals killed by drones?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/what_about_the_non_u_s_citizens_killed_by_drones_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/what_about_the_non_u_s_citizens_killed_by_drones_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians and the media ignore the overwhelming majority of those targeted and killed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nomination of John Brennan to be CIA director has prompted <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/07/brennan-pressed-drones-confirmation/">intense debate</a> on Capitol Hill and in the media about U.S. drone killings abroad. But the focus has been on the targeting of American citizens – a narrow issue that accounts for a miniscule proportion of the hundreds of drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen in recent years.</p><p>Consider: while <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2013/feb/08/nation/la-na-targeted-killing-20130209">four</a> American citizens are known to have been killed by drones in the past decade, the strikes have killed an<a href="http://counterterrorism.newamerica.net/drones">estimated</a> <a href="http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/category/projects/drones/">total</a> of 2,600 to 4,700 people over the same period.</p><div id="google-callout">The focus on American citizens overshadows a far more common, and less understood, type of strike: those that do not target American citizens, Al Qaeda leaders, or, in fact, any other specific individual.</div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/what_about_the_non_u_s_citizens_killed_by_drones_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/what_about_the_non_u_s_citizens_killed_by_drones_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World peace should be a priority again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/world_peace_should_be_a_priority_again_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/world_peace_should_be_a_priority_again_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13206506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data suggests that wars between countries are now rare, leading to an emerging "decline-in-violence" proposition]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a></p><p>CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — The very phrase “world peace” has become something of a synonym for naiveté. Yet in recent years, compelling evidence has emerged to suggest that at least one important aspect of world peace, the absence or rarity of war between countries, may in fact be close to a reality.</p><p>Scholarly work on what might be called the “decline-in-violence” phenomenon emerged following the conclusion of a surprisingly peaceful Cold War, but it has lately drawn greater popular and scholarly attention.</p><p>In a world replete with dangers, the decline-in-violence proposition is often treated with skepticism. But it is time for the international security community to think seriously about preparing for a durable world peace instead of the constant threat of world war.</p><p>To be clear, we cannot expect a violence-free world any time soon. Instead, the data suggest that certain kinds of violence, most notably inter-state warfare such as the two world wars, are becoming less common even as other forms of conflict increase.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/world_peace_should_be_a_priority_again_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/world_peace_should_be_a_priority_again_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latin America escaped the CIA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/latin_america_territorio_libre_from_the_cia_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/latin_america_territorio_libre_from_the_cia_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rendition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13205661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report shows that the region is the sole exception to Washington's global torture and rendition program]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The map <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/02/05/a-staggering-map-of-the-54-countries-that-reportedly-participated-in-the-cias-rendition-program/" target="_blank">tells</a> the story.  To illustrate a damning new report, “Globalizing Torture: CIA Secret Detentions and Extraordinary Rendition,” <a href="http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/projects/globalizing-torture" target="_blank">recently published</a> by the Open Society Institute, the <em>Washington Post </em>put together an equally damning graphic: it’s soaked in red, as if with blood, showing that in the years after 9/11, the CIA turned just about the whole world into a gulag archipelago.</p><p>Back in the early twentieth century, a similar red-hued map was used to indicate the global reach of the British Empire, on which, it was said, the sun never set.  It seems that, between 9/11 and the day George W. Bush left the White House, CIA-brokered torture never saw a sunset either.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/latin_america_territorio_libre_from_the_cia_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/latin_america_territorio_libre_from_the_cia_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are liberals being hypocrites about Obama&#8217;s wars?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/are_liberals_really_being_hypocrites_about_obamas_wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/are_liberals_really_being_hypocrites_about_obamas_wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13200473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe liberals don't criticize Obama's foreign policy because American liberalism has always been pro-intervention]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Atlantic's resident thoughtful apostate conservative Conor Friedersdorf <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/02/progressives-are-internalizing-hawkish-war-on-terror-claims/273102/">published a piece this morning</a> arguing that progressives who furiously fought against Bush's "war on terror" have internalized many of its central tenets, now that it's being waged by Barack Obama. Friedersdorf says liberals made various critiques of Bush's foreign misadventures -- that they caused "blowback," that they were an abuse of executive power, and that they implied a forever war without any possibility of an ending -- that they are now largely not making against Obama, even though all those arguments still apply.</p><p>The reason for this, according to Friedersdorf, is that everyone hated Bush and knew he was incompetent, but people like Obama because he's clearly smart and conscientious, which causes people to defend actions they would have criticized under his predecessor:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/are_liberals_really_being_hypocrites_about_obamas_wars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/are_liberals_really_being_hypocrites_about_obamas_wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do you explain drone killings? With post-Orwellian &#8220;Newspeak&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/how_do_you_explain_drone_killings_with_post_orwellian_newspeak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/how_do_you_explain_drone_killings_with_post_orwellian_newspeak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anwar al-Awlaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Wyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-Ore.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angus King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13196215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the logic of perma-war, "imminent threat" is everywhere and drone attacks on Americans are no problem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/john_brennan/">John Brennan’s</a> confirmation hearing on Thursday before the Senate Intelligence Committee struck many observers as a small but significant step in the direction of openness, a chink in the armor of secrecy that the last two presidential administrations have erected around the “war on terror.” Maybe that will turn out to be correct, and the incoming CIA director – the principal architect of President Obama’s drone war, and until recently a defender of rendition and “enhanced interrogation” – will launch a new era of transparency in Langley. While we wait for that, would you like to see this bridge I’ve got for sale in Brooklyn?</p><p>Indeed, watching the Brennan hearing, and then struggling through the troubling <a href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/020413_DOJ_White_Paper.pdf">Justice Department “white paper”</a> spelling out the legal justification for the drone killings of American citizens (which was recently acquired and released by NBC News), left me with quite a different feeling. In large part, this was the feeling that our government’s imperial creep continues uninterrupted, that most people <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/liberals_love_drones_too/">simply don’t care</a> (irrespective of their supposed political views) and that almost everyone involved in this charade, especially those of us in the media who are supposed to serve as the watchdogs, has agreed to ignore the most obvious and glaring questions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/how_do_you_explain_drone_killings_with_post_orwellian_newspeak/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/how_do_you_explain_drone_killings_with_post_orwellian_newspeak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: 54 countries supported CIA rendition</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/report_54_countries_supported_cia_rendition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/report_54_countries_supported_cia_rendition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Rendition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13191255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than a quarter of the world's governments covertly helped the U.S.'s controversial program]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a new report from human rights organization the <a title="" href="http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/about/programs/open-society-justice-initiative">Open Society Justice Initiative</a>, more than a quarter of the world's governments covertly helped the CIA carry out the kidnapping, detention and torture of terror suspects in some of the most chilling episodes of the U.S.'s "war on terror" after 9/11.</p><p>The report directs blame at the Bush administration for the rendition program, but stresses that the dozens of other governments covertly supporting the activities must also be held to account:</p><blockquote><p>There is no doubt that high-ranking Bush administration officials bear responsibility for authorizing human rights violations associated with secret detention and extraordinary rendition, and the impunity that they have enjoyed to date remains a matter of significant concern.</p> <p>But responsibility for these violations does not end with the United States. Secret detention and extraordinary rendition operations, designed to be conducted outside the United States under cover of secrecy, could not have been implemented without the active participation of foreign governments. These governments too must be held accountable.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/report_54_countries_supported_cia_rendition/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/report_54_countries_supported_cia_rendition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate-approved CIA torture report kept under wraps</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enhanced interrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 6,000-page investigation challenges the efficacy of enhanced interrogation during the war on terror]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence voted Thursday to approve a 6,000-page report on the use of torture and extraordinary rendition by the CIA, the investigation will for now remain classified. According to<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/13/senate-pressure-cia-interrogation-torture"> the Guardian</a>, Republican senators could push for the extensive report to stay under wraps, despite pressure from human rights advocates to make the information public.</p><p>"I believe it to be one of the most significant oversight efforts in the history of the United States Senate," said chair of the intelligence committee Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.  She noted that the report is "a comprehensive review of the CIA’s detention program that includes details of each detainee in CIA custody, the conditions under which they were detained, how they were interrogated, the intelligence they actually provided and the accuracy — or inaccuracy — of CIA descriptions about the program to the White House, Department of Justice, Congress and others."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extraordinary rendition&#8217;s day in court</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/extraordinary_renditions_day_in_court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/extraordinary_renditions_day_in_court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Rendition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khaled El-masri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Court of Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As "Zero Dark Thirty" debate rages, European court rules in favor of man sent to secret Afghan prison by the CIA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While new movie "Zero Dark Thirty" has renewed debates over the CIA's use of torture in the hunt for Osama bin Laden, a <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_EUROPE_US_RENDITIONS?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2012-12-13-08-00-00">Thursday ruling</a> in the European Court of Human Rights  has brought the issue of U.S. extraordinary rendition practices to the fore. The court ruled that the CIA illegally subjected a German-Lebanese man to extraordinary rendition in a secret Afghan prison sinisterly dubbed "the salt pit." It was the first case relating to the U.S.'s practice of transferring terror suspects across borders for interrogation to come before the Strasbourg-based court.</p><p>Khaled El-Masri was kidnapped in Macedonia by the authorities there and handed over to U.S. custody. He was flown to Afghanistan in December 2003 and interrogated there until his release in May 2004, when he was dumped on a mountain road in Albania. Thursday's European court decision focused on Macedonia's role, ruling that the government must pay El-Masri 60,000 euros in damages, but carries important implications for U.S. accountability over the use of torture in its war on terror.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/extraordinary_renditions_day_in_court/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/extraordinary_renditions_day_in_court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s community organizing: Occupy the globe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/obamas_community_organizing_occupy_the_globe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/obamas_community_organizing_occupy_the_globe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the onset of the Global War on Terror, the US has spent trillions on bases in countries you'd never expect]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Are you monitoring the construction?” asked the middle-aged man on a bike accompanied by his dog.</p><p>“<em>Ah, sì</em>,” I replied in my barely passable Italian.</p><p>“<em>Bene</em>,” he answered. Good.</p><p>In front of us, a backhoe’s guttural engine whined into action and empty dump trucks rattled along a dirt track. The shouts of men vied for attention with the metallic whirring of drills and saws ringing in the distance. Nineteen immense cranes spread across the landscape, with the foothills of Italy’s Southern Alps in the background. More than 100 pieces of earthmoving equipment, 250 workers, and grids of scaffolding wrapped around what soon would be 34 new buildings.</p><p>We were standing in front of a massive 145-acre construction site for a “little America” rising in <a href="http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/712" target="_blank">Vicenza</a>, an architecturally renowned Italian city and UNESCO world heritage site near Venice. This was <a href="http://www.stripes.com/news/construction-booming-at-vicenza-1.96914" target="_blank">Dal Molin</a>, the new military base the U.S. Army has been readying for the relocation of as many as 2,000 soldiers from Germany in 2013.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/obamas_community_organizing_occupy_the_globe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/obamas_community_organizing_occupy_the_globe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals let Obama get away with unconstitutional actions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/why_does_obama_get_a_pass_on_civil_liberties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/why_does_obama_get_a_pass_on_civil_liberties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habeas corpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's deplorable record on privacy and kill lists is an affront to our values. Liberals just shrug it off]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us stipulate, as lawyers like to say, that President Obama has a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/23/obama-romney-civil-liberties_n_2006992.html">deplorable record</a> on civil liberties, one that threatens long-term damage to the country’s constitutional culture.</p><p>Why, then, has his base of support not been eroded decisively? Why have so many on the left fallen silent, after railing against George W. Bush’s rights violations, as Obama has prolonged and codified most of the same practices? And why have so few on the right, riding a groundswell of resentment toward big government, failed to resent the biggest governmental intrusions into personal privacy since the FBI’s domestic spying during the Cold War?</p><p>The facts are not in dispute. While Obama has ordered an end to CIA kidnapping and torture, he has personally approved kill lists containing the names of American citizens to be targeted by drones. While he has tried to move the accused masterminds of 9/11 and others from Guantanamo to civilian courts (only to be blocked by congressional Republicans), he has also embraced military commissions and indefinite detention. He voiced misgivings about a bill subjecting suspected terrorists to military arrest — whether foreigners or Americans, whether in Afghanistan or Alabama — and then signed it into law.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/why_does_obama_get_a_pass_on_civil_liberties/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/why_does_obama_get_a_pass_on_civil_liberties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>140</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret socialist or grand bargainer?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/what_will_obamas_second_term_look_like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/what_will_obamas_second_term_look_like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13059306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A second term would likely look familiar -- and again depend upon how Obama chooses to deal with the GOP House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would a second Barack Obama term look like? There are way too many variables to answer the question with any confidence. His conservative enemies have their terrifying visions: He'd go full-on New Black Panther Party, basically. (Or else he'd simply spend all his time in a glow of self-satisfaction, appearing <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/328757/would-second-term-obama-be-any-different">on "The View" constantly.</a>) But for liberals and leftists, the idea of a reelected Obama involves a lot of uncertainty. (Though we are also hoping for the secret socialist agenda thing, mostly.)</p><p>Will a reelected Obama simply hold down the fort, protecting the domestic achievements of his first term and working to block the excesses of an activist Republican Congress? Or will he be in Grand Bargain legacy-establishing mode, desperate to cut bipartisan deals on as many issues as possible? If his foreign anti-terror campaigns are shown to be inspiring the sorts of attitudes that cause people to become terrorists in the first place will he reconsider his strategy or will we continue to act as though we can kill each terrorist (and only each terrorist) in the world one by one until there aren't any anymore? Will Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton <em>finally switch jobs?</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/what_will_obamas_second_term_look_like/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/what_will_obamas_second_term_look_like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Gitmo betrayal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/habeas_lawyers_against_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/habeas_lawyers_against_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habeas corpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detainees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13042380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2008, detainee lawyers backed him, thinking he'd restore the rule of law. They feel they were hoodwinked]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly five years ago, Gary Isaac, a corporate lawyer at a prestigious Chicago law firm, drank deeply from candidate Sen. Barack Obama's rhetorical reservoir of hope and change. The change Isaac was most concerned about had to do with the operation, outside the rule of law, of the U.S. military prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Isaac was deeply involved, pro bono, in helping detainees challenge their detention in U.S. courts by asserting their rights under the ancient writ of habeas corpus, which requires that the state justify the detention of a person before a judge.</p><p>So convinced was Isaac that a President Obama would restore habeas for detainees that in February 2008 he published a blog called<a href="http://habeaslawyersforobama.blogspot.com/"> Habeas Lawyers for Obama</a>, composed of one impassioned post, signed by 132 habeas lawyers, and posted just before Super Tuesday in the Democratic primaries. It concluded:</p><blockquote><p>The writ of habeas corpus dates to the Magna Carta, and was enshrined by the Founders in our Constitution. The Administration's attack on habeas corpus rights is dangerous and wrong. America needs a President who will not triangulate this issue. We need a President who will restore the rule of law, demonstrate our commitment to human rights, and repair our reputation in the world community. Based on our work with him, we are convinced that Senator Obama can do this because he truly feels these issues "in his bones."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/habeas_lawyers_against_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/habeas_lawyers_against_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spain nabs 3 al-Qaida suspects, Europe plot feared</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/02/spain_nabs_3_al_qaida_suspects_europe_plot_feared/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/02/spain_nabs_3_al_qaida_suspects_europe_plot_feared/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/08/02/spain_nabs_3_al_qaida_suspects_europe_plot_feared/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spanish police arrested three suspects and found explosive materials, raising fears about a possible plot]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MADRID (AP) — Police have arrested three suspected members of al-Qaida who had amassed explosives and may have been plotting attacks in Spain or elsewhere in Europe, Spain's interior minister said Thursday. Two of them had practiced flying light aircraft.</p><p>The three — a Russian, a Russian of Chechen descent and a Turk, according to Spanish police — were detained Wednesday. The Turk was arrested in the southern city of La Linea bordering the British colony of Gibraltar, while the other two were picked up near the central city of Ciudad Real as they traveled toward a northern Spanish town near the border with France.</p><p>Enough explosive material was found in the house in La Linea where the Turk lived to blow up a bus, and the material could be especially dangerous if combined with shrapnel, Interior Minister Jorge Fernandez Diaz said.</p><p>Investigators found no indications that the three were targeting Gibraltar, he said, declining to offer specifics on possible targets, except that "there are clear indications they could have been planning an attack in Spain and/or another country."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/02/spain_nabs_3_al_qaida_suspects_europe_plot_feared/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/02/spain_nabs_3_al_qaida_suspects_europe_plot_feared/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
