<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > War on women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/war_on_women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:10:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California court: Victim wasn&#8217;t married, rape conviction reversed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/california_court_victim_wasnt_married_rape_conviction_reversed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/california_court_victim_wasnt_married_rape_conviction_reversed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California court of appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assualt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man found guilty of raping a sleeping woman gets a new trial, as a consent statute doesn't protect single people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Feb. 20, 2009, an 18-year-old woman fell asleep in her bed with her boyfriend and woke up in the dark to find herself being penetrated by another man. Yesterday, a California court reversed the rape conviction of that man, Julio Morales, because the victim wasn't married to her boyfriend.</p><p>This is both less and more outrageous than it sounds, and gets to a legal problem <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1358546">beyond</a> the disturbing particulars of this case: whether consent under false pretenses is consent at all.</p><p>Before anger rains down solely on the three-judge panel from California's court of appeals, let's be clear here: One, the prosecutor screwed up by misapplying California's rape laws, and two, California's 19th-century rape laws still on the books are partly to blame. Still, the judges <a href="http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B233796.PDF">chose to interpret</a> the law as strictly as possible, reversing the entire conviction and instructing the court to retry the case on a more limited basis.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/california_court_victim_wasnt_married_rape_conviction_reversed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/california_court_victim_wasnt_married_rape_conviction_reversed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal doesn&#8217;t understand birth control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Louisiana governor tries to moderate his party's contraception stance, but gets his facts completely wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call off the culture war over birth control, left and right! Bobby Jindal has an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324640104578163120400999616.html">elegant solution</a> to rise above the fray. Or so he thinks.</p><p>Seizing on recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists that some hormonal birth control be available over the counter, the Louisiana governor and presumed presidential hopeful seeks to play them against the Affordable Care Act. He claims that Obama's big government is actually making it harder for women to access birth control, despite the fact that the ACOG recommendations would work best in tandem with the Affordable Care Act birth control provisions, not instead of them.</p><p>Making birth control more accessible in any way possible is generally a good idea. But in Jindal's haste to find "the end of birth control politics," he ignores some crucial benefits of the Affordable Care Act as well as the deep-seated opposition to many forms of birth control, not just insurance coverage of it, among his own allies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal: GOP &#8220;stupid&#8221; on birth control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The likely 2016 presidential candidate argues for the sale of contraception over the counter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby Jindal, the governor of Louisiana and a possible 2016 GOP presidential candidate,<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324640104578163120400999616.html"> endorsed the sale of over-the-counter contraception without a prescription Friday. </a></p><p>In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Jindal tried to put an anti-big-government spin on his position, while also moving away from the social conservative wing of the party and addressing a gender gap which hurt Mitt Romney and likely cost Republicans Senate seats in Indiana and Missouri.</p><p>Jindal wrote that Republicans have been "stupid to let the Democrats demagogue the contraceptives issue," while embracing the  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists call for over-the-counter sales and seeking to push the issue out of the "political arena.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona launches misleading abortion website</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/arizona_launches_misleading_abortion_website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/arizona_launches_misleading_abortion_website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A website by Arizona's Department of Health Services tries to manipulate women to keep them from having abortions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a Sunday <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/mccain_gop_has_to_offer_something_to_voters/">appearance</a> on Fox News, Sen. John McCain (R. AZ) signaled that Republicans might be ready to reconsider their extreme position on abortion rights. "As far as young women are concerned, absolutely. I don't think people like me -- I can state my opinion on abortion. But other than that, leave the issue alone," he said. It's sound advice, and makes for good policy.</p><p>Too bad his home state didn't get the memo.</p><p>Less than 24 hours later, the Arizona Department of Health Services launched "A Woman's Right to Know," an informational <a title="A Woman's Right to Know" href="http://www.azdhs.gov/phs/owch/informed-consent/index.htm" target="_blank">website</a> that uses manipulated ultrasound images and scary (read: medically <a title="Safety of Abortion" href="http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/facts/safety_of_abortion.html" target="_blank">inaccurate</a>) claims about the risks associated with abortion to keep women from having the safe, legal medical procedure. State Rep. Kimberly Yee (R. AZ) and other Arizona lawmakers have not been shy about the intent of the website, either. As Yee <a title="Arizona Daily Sun " href="http://azdailysun.com/news/local/state-and-regional/website-details-abortion-risks/article_b5fe246f-8260-59e0-bfdb-a3c1c6ad9bdf.html" target="_blank">told</a> the Arizona Daily Sun, "the medical drawings, which are in full color and much more detailed than any ultrasound, may give some prospective parents additional reasons to reconsider their initial decision to terminate the pregnancy."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/arizona_launches_misleading_abortion_website/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/arizona_launches_misleading_abortion_website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCain realizes GOP can&#8217;t win war on women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patty Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13107208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the GOP senator shies away from his remarks on abortion and Susan Rice, Patty Murray emerges as a Senate force]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John McCain sounded awfully <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/mccain_gop_has_to_offer_something_to_voters/">chastened</a> yesterday. Gone was the bluster of doing "everything in my power to block" Susan Rice from a position she has yet to be nominated for. He didn't question her competence. The rage gave way to this Sunday morning walkback: "I think she deserves the ability and the opportunity to explain herself and her position, just as she said. But, she's not the problem. The problem is the president of the United States."</p><p>I doubt McCain is done being an angry, bitter man who still hasn't forgiven Rice for her <a href="http://nymag.com/news/politics/powergrid/susan-rice-secretary-of-state-2012-12/index1.html">attack</a> on him during the 2008 presidential campaign. But someone must have told him that trashing an accomplished, relatively young woman of color who wasn't even remotely responsible for what happened in Benghazi is just not a good look these days. Maybe McCain underestimated how many people had Rice's back, from the Congressional Black Caucus to the president himself -- just as his fellow party members had underestimated the power of the voting bloc they commanded on Nov. 6.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox news column claims &#8220;women aren’t women anymore&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/fox_news_column_claims_women_aren%e2%80%99t_women_anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/fox_news_column_claims_women_aren%e2%80%99t_women_anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13107445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suzanne Venker argues that feminism has killed marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox news' Suzanne Venker has issued a <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/24/war-on-men/">groundbreaking opinion piece</a> in which she flips the script on the media's dialogue of  the "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/binders_full_of_offensive_rape_remarks/">war on women</a>," calling it, instead, the "war on men."  Venker argues that "feminists" (or simply women who pursue higher education and careers) are to blame for the "dearth of good men" because "women aren’t women anymore":</p><blockquote><p>It’s the women who lose. Not only are they saddled with the consequences of sex, by dismissing male nature they’re forever seeking a balanced life. The fact is, women need men’s linear career goals – they need men to pick up the slack at the office – in order to live the balanced life they seek.</p> <p>So if men today are slackers, and if they’re retreating from marriage en masse, women should look in the mirror and ask themselves what role they’ve played to bring about this transformation.</p></blockquote><p>But, "fortunately, there is good news," Suzanne Venker writes."Women have the power to turn everything around. All they have to do is surrender to their nature – their femininity – and let men surrender to theirs. If they do, marriageable men will come out of the woodwork."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/fox_news_column_claims_women_aren%e2%80%99t_women_anymore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/fox_news_column_claims_women_aren%e2%80%99t_women_anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Businessweek pulls &#8220;attractive female students&#8221; poll after backlash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After facing overwhelmingly negative reactions, the publication pulled the poll, saying it was "in poor taste"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday, Nov. 9, Businessweek asked its Twitter followers to vote on "Which business school has the most attractive female students." Predictably, readers found the tweet and the poll it linked to <a href="http://topsy.com/www.businessweek.com/face-off/2012-11-09/which-business-school-has-the-most-attractive-female-students">offensive</a>. Writer Shelby Knox <a href="https://twitter.com/shelbyknox/status/267107652776099840">replied with sarcasm</a>: "Do women go to B-School to run companies, be on boards? Hell no! For the pleasure of male students," while Jamil Smith <a href="https://twitter.com/jamilsmith/status/267281576268812288">admonished</a> Businessweek, writing, "You'd think <a href="http://topsy.com/twitter/bw">@BW</a> would be above chauvinist crap like this, or should want to be."</p><p>But, as Daily Dot's Aja Romano points out, this is not the first year that Businessweek has issued polls <a href="http://images.businessweek.com/slideshows/20110907/fifty-colleges-with-the-hottest-guys-girls-and-nightlife#slide2">rating the attractiveness</a> of students:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Embattled antiabortion forces hope to pull it out for Romney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abortion opponents have had a lousy campaign, but they think they might be able to deliver Romney a key swing state]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Ohio over the weekend, an antiabortion protester <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/protesters-removed-obama-rally-shouting-during-speech-021402287--election.html">interrupted</a> an Obama event by shouting and holding a sign, upside down, that read, "This moral wrong should never be a constitutional right!" He was escorted out, and Obama made a joke about sports fans being peeved at a loss. But if you believe right-to-lifers, the man represented more than an isolated incident.</p><p>After years of public-relations and legislative wins, the anti-choice movement is sounding unusually defensive lately. All indications are that they've driven a lot of women into the Obama camp, further widening the much-discussed gender gap, and adopting the movement's aims has possibly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/will_stances_on_women_cost_gop_the_senate/">cost</a> Republicans the Senate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirty Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Steve King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anti-choice, pro-gun, you name it. Eight Democrats who want -- but don't deserve -- your vote tomorrow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This hasn't been a great year for progressive causes. Whether you're a woman, an immigrant, an environmentalist or a person who doesn't want to be killed by a gun (the list goes on), the 112th Congress was pretty much a disaster.</p><p>And while it's extremists like Richard Mourdock, Rep. Todd Akin, R-Mo., and Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who received progressives’ derision for saying (and voting for) completely off-the-wall stuff, plenty of Democrats got in on the rape-denying, gun-loving, science-hating action, too. While these Blue Dogs might not want to repeal health care reform (well, except when they <a href="http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/57769/larry-kissell">do</a>), their records should still give you pause. Here are eight conservative Democrats who are hurting their party <em>and</em> their country -- but still want your vote.</p><p>[slide_show id=13063497]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Todd Akin, right-wing hero</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/todd_akin_right_wing_hero/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/todd_akin_right_wing_hero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13054272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican Senate candidate in Missouri doesn't just spew anti-abortion rhetoric, he acts on it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> Todd Akin, the Republican challenger for Claire McCaskill’s U.S. Senate seat representing Missouri, has made himself a national figure so far this election season by declaring that women can’t get pregnant from “legitimate rape” and <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/10/02/todd_akin_videos_cspan_clips_reveal_the_missouri_candiate_s_paranoia_about_abortion_and_stem_cell_research_.html">claiming that abortion clinics</a> routinely perform abortions on women who aren’t actually pregnant. But what’s garnered less attention, until this week, has been Akin’s history of not just saying but also <em>doing</em> disturbing things. His history shows a lifelong dedication to a misogynist right-wing ideology that flirts with using force to get its way when persuasion fails.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/todd_akin_right_wing_hero/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/todd_akin_right_wing_hero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tina Fey says Todd Akin is confusing &#8220;legitimate rape&#8221; with &#8220;competitive gymnastics&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/tina_fey_says_todd_akin_is_confusing_legitimate_rape_with_competitive_gymnastics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/tina_fey_says_todd_akin_is_confusing_legitimate_rape_with_competitive_gymnastics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13051797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The comedian and "30 Rock" star slammed the congressman's outrageous comment at a dinner Wednesday night]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During her speech at last night's Center for Reproductive Rights' Inaugural Gala, comedian Tina Fey addressed Missouri senate hopeful Todd Akin's "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/19/todd_akin_legitimate_rape_stops_pregnancy/">legitimate rape</a>" comment, joining a slew of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/daily_show_co_creator_lizz_winstead_launches_lady_parts_justice/">vocal</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/sarah_silverman_want_to_vote_this_year_get_a_gun/">funny ladies</a> who have spoken out against the GOP's perceived <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/war_on_women_isnt_over/">war on women</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Todd Akin claims that women can't really get pregnant from a legitimate rape because the body secretes hormones. Now I can't even finish this sentence without getting dumber; it's making me dumber when I say it—but it's something about the body not being able to get pregnant when it's under physical stress. Mr. Akin, I think you are confusing the phrase 'legitimate rape' with the phrase 'competitive gymnastics.'"</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/tina_fey_says_todd_akin_is_confusing_legitimate_rape_with_competitive_gymnastics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/tina_fey_says_todd_akin_is_confusing_legitimate_rape_with_competitive_gymnastics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN wonders: &#8220;Do hormones drive women&#8217;s votes?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/cnn_wonders_do_hormones_drive_womens_votes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/cnn_wonders_do_hormones_drive_womens_votes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13051171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN Health has a theory]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pursuing those women voters might be a lost cause for the 2012 candidates, <a href="http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/24/do-hormones-drive-womens-votes/">CNN Health </a>says, because their lady parts might be doing the voting for them:</p><blockquote><p>"While the campaigns eagerly pursue female voters, there’s something that may raise the chances for both presidential candidates that’s totally out of their control: women’s ovulation cycles.</p> <p>You read that right. New research suggest that hormones may influence female voting choices differently, depending on whether a woman is single or in a committed relationship."</p></blockquote><p>Though CNN Health stipulates that "several political scientists who read the study have expressed skepticism about its conclusions," it still posts those conclusions, which are:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/cnn_wonders_do_hormones_drive_womens_votes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/cnn_wonders_do_hormones_drive_womens_votes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Mourdock, misogynist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/richard_mourdock_misogynist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/richard_mourdock_misogynist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13050401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pregnancy after rape is what "God intended," says the Indiana Republican, showing the real right-to-life movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear everyone asking what it is about Republican candidates and their clumsy talk about rape: This is a feature, not a bug.</p><p>The latest entrant into the Republican rape insensitivity bake-off is Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock, who <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/gop_senate_candidate_pregnancy_from_rape_is_something_that_god_intended/">said</a> tonight that "even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen." He, of course, joins fellow Senate candidate Todd Akin, with his now-canonical "legitimate rape" comment, and Rep. Joe Walsh, running for election in Illinois, who <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/politics-elections/262945-joe-walsh-abortion-never-necessary-to-save-womens-lives">claimed</a> there was no reason a woman would ever need an abortion to save her life or preserve her health. The trailblazer was Tea Party candidate Sharron Angle, who failed to unseat Harry Reid in Nevada two years ago, and famously <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/08/sharron-angles-advice-for_n_639294.html">said</a> that if a hypothetical teenager was raped and impregnated by her father, it was an opportunity to turn "a lemon situation into lemonade."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/richard_mourdock_misogynist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/richard_mourdock_misogynist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not just forced ultrasound: Abortion rights under assault</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/its_not_just_forced_ultrasound_abortion_rights_under_assault/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/its_not_just_forced_ultrasound_abortion_rights_under_assault/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13046230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, some 1,100 bills targeted reproductive rights -- and 135 passed in 36 states. The cost? Women's health]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A young girl in a green tank top lies on the examination table in a stark exam room in a Houston clinic. Her pink toenails dangle below<strong> </strong>the sterile covering draped over her thighs. The doctor inserts a probe between her legs and the two watch a grainy blob blossom on a sonogram screen suspended below the room’s industrial fluorescent lights. He gives a state-mandated description of the fetus: almost exactly seven weeks, he says, “nice and early.” She is well within the time frame for an abortion pill, rather than surgery.</p><p>The doctor, an avuncular, silver-haired man who's been providing abortions, in the words of one colleague, “pretty much since Roe v. Wade,” turns the screen toward her and traces the outline of her uterus and the embryo, while the girl looks on blankly. He plays the heartbeat, which rises from the machine in a loud, shrill electronic pulse. The ritual, which is repeated several times a day at this Planned Parenthood in Houston and in clinics across the state, is mandated by a <a href="http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/02/08/10355099-texas-begins-enforcing-strict-anti-abortion-sonogram-law?lite">new Texas law</a> designed to intensify the experience of abortion — to impress upon a woman, with images and sounds, the sense that she's about to terminate a living thing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/its_not_just_forced_ultrasound_abortion_rights_under_assault/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/its_not_just_forced_ultrasound_abortion_rights_under_assault/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney&#8217;s &#8220;binders full of women&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitt_romneys_binders_full_of_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitt_romneys_binders_full_of_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binders Full of Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13043106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The definitive slideshow: From Beyonce to Bill Clinton to John Cusack, Mitt's quest for qualified women made a meme]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A highlight of last night's town hall debate (at least for women) was when GOP hopeful Mitt Romney answered voter Katherine Fenton's question about women inequalities in the workplace. Romney's response had nothing to do with women's inequalities, but everything to do with his bizarre quest to find "qualified women" for his campaign, which apparently was so difficult that he had to collect "binders full" of those things called "women."</p><p>And thus, a meme was born:</p><p>[slide_show id=13043036]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitt_romneys_binders_full_of_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitt_romneys_binders_full_of_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Daily Show&#8221; co-creator Lizz Winstead launches Lady Parts Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/daily_show_co_creator_lizz_winstead_launches_lady_parts_justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/daily_show_co_creator_lizz_winstead_launches_lady_parts_justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ladypartsjustice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lizz winstead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Parts Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13031563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The site is an effort to mobilize and empower citizens to speak up for women's reproductive rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lizz Winstead is fed up with politicians legislating women's reproductive rights. And if you're Lizz Winstead, "The Daily Show" co-creator and former head writer, this usually means your hatred will fuel excellent political satire, humorous rage or both. Winstead <a href="http://boingboing.net/2012/10/05/lizz-winstead-co-creator-of-d.html">writes</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Look, it’s time to stop being polite and start asking, “What the f*ck do you think you are trying to pull here?”</p> <p>It is time to ask, “Why the f*ck are men and women who are inexcusably incompetent continually being elected into statehouses, governorships and THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS? And how the f*ck is it that <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/08/house-committee-science/">this asshole serves on THE SCIENCE COMMITTEE</a> of The House of Representatives?!</p> <p>ENOUGH.</p></blockquote><p>This morning, she launched <a href="http://www.ladypartsjustice.com/">Lady Parts Justice</a> (presumably a reference to the controversial <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2212062/President-Barack-Obama-Obama-scrubs-controversial-vote-like-lady-parts-depend-e-card.html">e-card</a> that went viral from the Obama campaign's Tumblr), an advocacy site and PSA that encourages fans of women to vote:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/daily_show_co_creator_lizz_winstead_launches_lady_parts_justice/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/daily_show_co_creator_lizz_winstead_launches_lady_parts_justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Antiabortion laws inspire abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/anti_abortion_laws_linked_to_provider_harassment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/anti_abortion_laws_linked_to_provider_harassment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13025948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When legislatures target clinics, so do in-your-face activists, new research shows]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"They will know your habits and routines. They know where you shop, who your friends are, what you drive, where you live," said the letter to the abortion provider. "You will be checking under your car everyday — because maybe today is the day someone places an explosive under it."</p><p>Mila Means hadn't even begun to actually provide abortions in Wichita, Kan., when Angel Dillard sent her that letter last year, <a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/article/Abortion-opponent-says-letter-divinely-inspired-3608456.php">claiming in court</a> that its writing was both "divinely inspired" and protected by the First Amendment. But according to a <a href="http://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(12)00093-5/abstract">new study in Contraception</a> co-authored by an abortion provider in California, Kansas' draconian state laws around reproductive rights may have encouraged Dillard.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/anti_abortion_laws_linked_to_provider_harassment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/anti_abortion_laws_linked_to_provider_harassment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Birth control extremism bites GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/birth_control_extremism_comes_back_to_bite_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/birth_control_extremism_comes_back_to_bite_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blunt amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13021477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will national Republican opposition to birth control access hurt Senate chances in Massachusetts and Connecticut?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is something inconvenient for a self-professed moderate, pro-choice Republican running in a blue state: Getting pegged as opposing birth control access. It's a danger Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown courted when, in March, he co-sponsored the Blunt Amendment, which would have allowed any employer to deny coverage of birth control (among other things) on religious grounds, and that Connecticut Senate candidate Linda McMahon invited by saying, however tepidly, that she'd have supported it. We're about to find out how the voters of their respective states feel about the extremism on women's health that's become the national Republican consensus -- with control of the Senate at stake.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/birth_control_extremism_comes_back_to_bite_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/birth_control_extremism_comes_back_to_bite_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How choice won</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/winning_the_abortion_battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/winning_the_abortion_battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13018000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feminist pioneers built the road to Roe with a decades-long strategy centered on creating a right to privacy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In their pursuit of liberty and equality in the marketplace, women’s advocates challenged conventional views of motherhood and the divide between public and private life in America. The women’s movement exposed the male-breadwinner model of the economy as a fiction, and women from all social ranks fought for new economic arrangements and cultural norms. In many respects, they succeeded; in some, they failed. Women gained new freedoms in the marketplace, but feminists did not fully resolve the dilemmas of motherhood or win political support for new initiatives to support it. Nor did they harmonize the interests of different groups of women. A similar story accounts for the successes and failures women met when they challenged, at the same time and with equal commitment, another dimension of American life that many considered not just deleterious but cruel and repugnant: their lack of control over their own bodies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/winning_the_abortion_battle/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/winning_the_abortion_battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Pro-choice stance aids Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/poll_pro_choice_stance_aids_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/poll_pro_choice_stance_aids_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Fluke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13016790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new survey finds no evidence anyone was "alienated" by the vocally pro-choice Democratic National Convention ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the Democratic National Convention included an unapologetic defense of reproductive rights for women, there was some predictable centrist <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/stop_the_abortion_apologies/">hand-wringing</a>. Had Democrats <a href="After http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-05/how-democrats-lost-their-way-on-abortion.html  ">"lost their way"</a> on abortion?  On "This Week," Cokie Roberts <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/15/democrats-push-envelope-on-abortion-drop-insistence-that-it-be-rare.html  ">complained</a> that the convention was “over the top in terms of abortion … Every single speaker talked about abortion, and you know, at some point, you start to alienate people.”</p><p>So this tidbit in the just-released Pew poll <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/09/19/obama-ahead-with-stronger-support-better-image-and-lead-on-most-issues/">stands out</a>: 48 percent of respondents preferred Barack Obama when it came to "reflecting your view on abortion." That's up by 13 points. Compare that to the 35 percent who said Mitt Romney reflected their views, following several weeks of Democrats working hard to equate Paul Ryan and the Republican platform with Todd Akin on rape and incest exceptions. (Despite Romney's current support of them.) Obama also enjoyed similar growth on issues like foreign policy and healthcare, suggesting an overall lift. But there is no reason to think anyone was pushed away by Democrats defending their support for access to abortion or contraception.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/poll_pro_choice_stance_aids_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/poll_pro_choice_stance_aids_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>