<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Washington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/washington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton to return to work next week</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_clinton_to_return_to_work_next_week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_clinton_to_return_to_work_next_week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Secretary of State will return to Washington after being treated for a blood clot in her head]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The State Department says Secretary of State Hillary Clinton plans to return to work next week after being treated for a blood clot in her head.</p><p>Spokeswoman Victoria Nuland says Clinton is resting at home but is speaking with senior staff and is, quote, "sounding terrific, upbeat and raring to go."</p><p>She says Clinton looks forward to returning to her Washington office next week, although a date hasn't been set. Doctors have advised her to avoid international travel for now.</p><p>Clinton was discharged Wednesday from a New York hospital, three days after doctors diagnosed a blood clot during a follow-up exam stemming from a concussion she suffered in December. Doctors are treating the clot with blood thinners and say they expect she will fully recover.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_clinton_to_return_to_work_next_week/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_clinton_to_return_to_work_next_week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana smoothie, anyone?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the drug now legal in Washington and Colorado, blended cannabis could become the health food craze of 2013]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> One of the nation's leading cannabis doctors has an idea for a New Year's diet: a marijuana smoothie. Dr. William Courtney, who has spent years researching the potential health benefits of medical marijuana, argues that juicing whole hemp plants can provide a host of healing properties, ranging from pain relief to even helping prevent diseases like cancer.</p><p>Yet, many of the health benefits are lost, Courtney says, when a patient ingests marijuana in the most typical way: by smoking it. Burning the plant kills off enzymes, which can diminish some of the curative properties. Juicing the entire plant, on the other hand, retains the enzymes and may be more medically beneficial. Plus, smoking the plant kicks the THC--and its psychoactive properties--into high gear, producing marijuana's high, which many find to be a curative effect in its own right, but is not always what the patient desires or wants.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C.-area Starbucks writing &#8220;come together&#8221; on cups</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/d_c_area_starbucks_writing_come_together_on_cups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/d_c_area_starbucks_writing_come_together_on_cups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starbucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coffee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starbucks hopes it will persuade lawmakers to reach a "fiscal cliff" deal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starbucks stores in the D.C. area will write "Come Together" on all of their coffee cups from now through December 28, in the hopes that it will encourage lawmakers to reach a "fiscal cliff" deal.</p><p>Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz <a href="http://www.starbucks.com/blog/lets-come-together-america">wrote</a> in a blog post on the company's website that “Rather than be bystanders, we have an opportunity — and I believe a responsibility — to use our company’s scale for good by sending a respectful and optimistic message to our elected officials to come together and reach common ground on this important issue.”</p><p>"It’s a small gesture, but the power of small gestures is what Starbucks is about! Imagine the power of our partners and hundreds of thousands of customers each sharing such a simple message, one cup at a time," Schultz writes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/d_c_area_starbucks_writing_come_together_on_cups/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/d_c_area_starbucks_writing_come_together_on_cups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My twisted rehab sex life</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/my_twisted_rehab_sex_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/my_twisted_rehab_sex_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substance Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some say you shouldn't hook up with anyone during your first year of sobriety. I found out the hard way]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" align="left" /></a>  Alicia was a blonde bombshell with all the right curves and thick, lush lips. Angelina Jolie lips. One look and I had to have her. At any cost. She was the answer to all my problems. No one could convince me otherwise—not my counselor, my parents, my lawyer, my prescribing doctor.</p><p>We were residents at a strict segregated rehab in Southern California, and communication between opposite sexes was extremely limited. This made the task of seducing Alicia all the more daunting, more exciting and more intense. I was a serious drug abuser: I’d do anything for intensity.</p><p>I started by violating the “sprinkler rule,” a strictly enforced regulation that forbids men and women from holding eye contact for more than three seconds—or around the time it takes for a lawn sprinkler to pass by a patch of grass. I ignored this rule. In fact, for a few days I sat in the lounge gazing intently at Alicia until she noticed. Somehow, she received my message without being creeped out—at least not entirely. But how could I be sure? We had never spoken a word.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/my_twisted_rehab_sex_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/my_twisted_rehab_sex_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plans sprout for a One Million Child March over guns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/plans_sprout_for_a_one_million_child_march_over_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/plans_sprout_for_a_one_million_child_march_over_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One million child march]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Who could say no to one million kids?'" ask organizers hoping to plan a mass gun control rally]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Within mere days Newtown massacre, groups are already organizing to exert pressure on politicians in Washington over gun control. An effort has begun building momentum across social media to plan a "<a href="http://www.facebook.com/1millionkidstoDC">One Million Child March"</a> to bring a million children (presumably chaperoned) to converge on D.C.'s national mall and rally for greater control.</p><p>" Who could say no to a million kids? Not even Congress," suggested the One Million Child March Facebook group, which has already garnered nearly 3,000 "likes" within hours of its founding.</p><p>A highly tentative date for the event has been set for Feb. 17.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/plans_sprout_for_a_one_million_child_march_over_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/plans_sprout_for_a_one_million_child_march_over_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dem senator demands answers on White House pot policy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/dem_senator_demands_answers_on_white_house_pot_policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/dem_senator_demands_answers_on_white_house_pot_policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick J. Leahy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Leahy wants to know how the federal government will handle the two states that legalized marijuana]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., demanded answers from the federal government about how it will handle drug enforcement in Washington and Colorado, now that both states have legalized marijuana.</p><p>In a <a href="http://www.leahy.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/12-6-12%20copy%20PJL%20to%20Kerlikowske%20re%20-%20fed%20drug%20control%20policy.pdf">letter</a> to Gil Kerlikowske, the administration's director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, Leahy wrote:</p><blockquote><p>The Senate Judiciary Committee has a significant interest in the effect of these developments on Federal drug control policy. How does the Office of National Drug Control Policy intend to prioritize Federal resources, and what recommendations are you making to the Department of Justice and other agencies in light of the choice by citizens of Colorado and Washington to legalize personal use of small amounts of marijuana? What assurance can and will the administration give to state officials involved in the licensing of marijuana retailers that they will not face Federal criminal penalties for carrying out duties assigned to them under state law?</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/dem_senator_demands_answers_on_white_house_pot_policy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/dem_senator_demands_answers_on_white_house_pot_policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politico flunks economics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/politico_flunks_economics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/politico_flunks_economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new piece examining how to spark the economy reveals how stale conventional wisdom in D.C. really is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this Politico <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/crafting-a-boom-economy-84878.html" target="_blank">piece</a> about how to get the economy growing in earnest again, I was struck by how out of sync the conventional/DC story is compared to what I and other growth analysts think is going on (h/t: DS).</p><p>Here’s the agenda:</p><blockquote><p>…tax reform that goes way beyond individuals and rates; much deeper Social Security and Medicare changes than currently envisioned; quick movement on trade agreements, including a proposed one with Europe; an energy policy that exploits the oil and gas boom; and allowing foreign-born students with science expertise to stay here and start businesses.</p> <p>Do this and there could be not an economic recovery — but a boom, many argue.</p></blockquote><p>Really?  I gotta say, I don’t see it.  In fact, pretty much everything on that list is a) conventional wisdom in DC and b) largely a distraction from where I think the evidence is actually pointing, as I’ll stress in a moment.  To be clear, raising more tax revenues and slowing health care costs are critical in terms of getting our long-term debt situation under control, and immigration reform that provides a path for folks here to stay is also <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/immigration-and-efficiency/" target="_blank">a great idea</a>.  A domestic energy boom is already underway and trade agreements do squat for growth (which doesn’t mean they’re not worth it—but their growth potential is hugely overhyped).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/politico_flunks_economics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/politico_flunks_economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dan Savage gets married in Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/dan_savage_gets_married_in_washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/dan_savage_gets_married_in_washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Savage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Savage took advantage of the state's new law legalizing gay marriages]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Savage tweeted a picture of his wedding in Washington today:</p><p>[embedtweet id="277893775580336128"]</p><p>Last week, Savage lined up with other gay couples in the state to get their marriage licenses, after the state legalized gay marriage in November.</p><p>“It’s really a remarkable journey we’ve been on and such a remarkable sea change,” Savage told <a href="http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2012/12/06/dan-savage-and-husband-get-washington-marriage-license/#8804-3">Seattlepi.com</a>. “And not just for gay people, but straight people have changed, too. It’s gotten better for us because straight people have gotten better about us.”</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/MbvlmGH3Mo8" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/dan_savage_gets_married_in_washington/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/dan_savage_gets_married_in_washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Obama harsh Washington and Colorado&#8217;s high?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/will_obama_harsh_washington_and_colorados_high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/will_obama_harsh_washington_and_colorados_high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that voters have made it clear they support legal recreational marijuana use, the feds need to make a choice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Since it became clear last month that recreational marijuana initiatives would pass in Colorado and Washington, the big question has been: Will the feds come after these states?</p><p>Under federal law, recreational marijuana use is still illegal. But now that the American people (in two states, at least) have made it clear they support legal recreational marijuana use, the Feds have to make a choice about whether to lay down the law – the federal law, that is -- or respect voters' choices.</p><p>The New York Times had <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/us/marijuana-initiatives-in-2-states-set-federal-officials-scrambling.html?pagewanted=all">a story </a>yesterday about this issue. It noted that “the Obama administration has been holding high-level meetings since the election to debate the response of federal law enforcement agencies to the decriminalization efforts.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/will_obama_harsh_washington_and_colorados_high/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/will_obama_harsh_washington_and_colorados_high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slideshow: Gay couples get married in Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/slideshow_gay_couples_get_married_in_washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/slideshow_gay_couples_get_married_in_washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same-sex marriages in Washington state officially became legal this week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Same-sex marriages in Washington state officially became legal this week]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/slideshow_gay_couples_get_married_in_washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Washington couples get marriage licenses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/gay_wash_couples_get_marriage_licenses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/gay_wash_couples_get_marriage_licenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Gregoire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/gay_wash_couples_get_marriage_licenses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The state's new marriage equality law goes into effect]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEATTLE (AP) — Two by two, dozens of same-sex couples obtained their marriage licenses in Washington state early Thursday, just hours after hours after Gov. Chris Gregoire signed a law legalizing gay marriage.</p><p>King County, the state's biggest county, opened the doors to its auditor's office in Seattle just after midnight PST to start distributing marriage licenses. But hundreds of people had lined up hours earlier, snaking around the downtown Seattle building on a chilly December night.</p><p>"We knew it was going to happen, but it's still surreal," said Amanda Dollente, who along with her partner, Kelly Middleton, began standing in line at 4 p.m. Wednesday.</p><p>Washington state now joins several other states that allow gay and lesbian couples to wed. Gregoire and Secretary of State Sam Reed certified the election on Wednesday afternoon, as they were joined by couples who plan to wed and community activists who worked on the campaign supporting gay marriage.</p><p>Because the state has a three-day waiting period, the earliest that weddings can take place is Sunday. Same-sex couples who previously were married in another state that allows gay marriage, like Massachusetts, will not have to get remarried in Washington state. Their marriages will be valid here as soon as the law takes effect.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/gay_wash_couples_get_marriage_licenses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/gay_wash_couples_get_marriage_licenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 possible futures for legalized pot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/8_possible_futures_for_legalized_pot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/8_possible_futures_for_legalized_pot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13115797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drug policy reformers are still grappling over different strategies, but here's how things could play out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Pot-smokers of the world unite! You have nothing to lose but your pipe dreams.</p><p>Marijuana legalization is a beginning, not an end.</p><p>When residents of Colorado and Washington voted to legalize the adult use of cannabis, it felt like a momentary rush of sobriety in a country dazed by decades of anti-marijuana hysteria. But what comes next?</p><p>The drug war edifice is cracking and the end of prohibition may be nigh. Or may not be. The way things play out is not preordained. Major strategic differences among legalization proponents are surfacing about how to proceed. Some drug policy reform leaders, fearing an official backlash, are urging a cautious, go-slow, approach: make it as easy as possible for the feds to back off and let the states do their thing. Other voices, claiming a pro-pot electoral mandate, are calling for bold, assertive moves to implement the will of the voters.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/8_possible_futures_for_legalized_pot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/8_possible_futures_for_legalized_pot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could pot stop breast cancer?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/could_pot_stop_breast_cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/could_pot_stop_breast_cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13107825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medical marijuana is legal in 18 states, but it's clear we've only discovered a fraction of its medicinal potential]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> There are now legal medical cannabis programs in 18 states plus Washington, DC, with pot fully legal for adults in two other states. Ironically, however, the actual healing power of the plant has barely been tapped. Smoking marijuana with THC (tetrahydrocannabinol), or better, vaporizing it (using a device to bake the plant material and inhale the active ingredients), has an indisputably palliative effect and can be medically useful for pain relief, calming and appetite stimulation. It already has confirmed benefits against glaucoma, epilepsy and other specific diseases and disorders. It also gets people high. THC triggers cannabinoid receptors in the brain and this produces the sensation of being stoned. These receptors are found in the parts of the brain linked to pleasure, memory, concentration, and time perception.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/could_pot_stop_breast_cancer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/could_pot_stop_breast_cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Washington needs Joe Biden</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/why_washington_needs_joe_biden/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/why_washington_needs_joe_biden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13107519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget the goofy uncle image. Biden's the only senior official willing to dissent from the foreign policy consensus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin Logan, the director of foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, has an <a href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/how-washington-makes-love-for-war/ ">excellent piece</a> at the American Conservative arguing that Paula Broadwell’s quick and inexplicable rise through the foreign policy establishment -- to a station that would put her in such close proximity to David Petraeus -- illuminates the groupthink of the national security elite in Washington. It's an elite that obsesses over process arguments while eschewing real debate over important strategic issues.</p><p>For instance, Logan writes, the debate over Iran starts and ends with the assumption that the country must be prevented from acquiring nuclear weapons at all costs. It's almost impossible to find inside voices who question that underlying assumption, even though there’s plenty of evidence that it would be possible to contain a nuclear Iran at reasonable costs. Meanwhile, President Obama made few major adjustments to George W. Bush’s national security apparatus. Mitt Romney, who disagreed with Obama on just about everything, could find almost nothing substantive that he would do differently from Obama on strategic national security issues. On Israel, China, Russia or the need for a massive American military empire there is a clear, bipartisan foreign policy consensus; dissenting voices are dismissed almost out of hand as unserious, so most people who hold them stay quiet to stay on the inside.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/why_washington_needs_joe_biden/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/why_washington_needs_joe_biden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative legal group advises Christian clerks on gay marriage licenses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/conservative_legal_group_advises_christian_clerks_on_gay_marriage_licenses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/conservative_legal_group_advises_christian_clerks_on_gay_marriage_licenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13103747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And tells them how to avoid issuing licenses if it violates their "conscience"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conservative legal group Alliance Defending Freedom is advising clerks in Maine, Maryland and Washington how they can avoid issuing newly legal marriage licences to gay couples, so they can "perform their job without violating their conscience."</p><p>The ADF, formerly known as the Alliance Defense Fund, <a href="http://www.charismanews.com/us/34603-gays-cant-force-christian-clerks-to-issue-same-sex-licenses">sent out</a> legal memos to municipal clerks in the three states, which each legalized gay marriage on Election Day, telling them that they “can readily resolve this potential religious conflict” and avoid issuing the marriage licenses themselves, instead delegating to those who don't have such objections.</p><p>“No American should be forced to give up a constitutionally protected freedom, nor should any American be forced to give up his or her job to maintain that freedom,” said ADF senior counsel Austin R. Nimocks. “Religious freedom is paramount to every American, including those issuing marriage licenses. They can perform their job without violating their conscience.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/conservative_legal_group_advises_christian_clerks_on_gay_marriage_licenses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/conservative_legal_group_advises_christian_clerks_on_gay_marriage_licenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 reasons the feds shouldn&#8217;t crack down on pot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_reasons_the_fed_shouldnt_crack_down_on_pot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_reasons_the_fed_shouldnt_crack_down_on_pot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colorado and Washington became the first states to legalize marijuana. It behooves Obama to let them have their way]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> On Election Day, Washington State and Colorado became the first two states in the country -- and indeed the first political jurisdictions anywhere in the world -- to approve legally regulating marijuana like alcohol.</p><p>It would be a mistake to call these ballot initiative victories "pro-pot." Most of those who voted in favor don't use marijuana; indeed many don't like it at all and have never used it. What moved them was the realization that it made more sense to regulate, tax and control marijuana than to keep wasting money and resources trying to enforce an unenforceable prohibition.</p><p>Whether or not the two state governments move forward with regulating marijuana like alcohol will depend on two things: how the Obama administration, federal prosecutors and police agencies respond; and the extent to which the states' senior elected officials commit to implementing the will of the people. The fact that federal laws explicitly criminalize marijuana transactions, and that the federal government can continue to enforce those laws, means that federal authorities could effectively block the initiatives from being fully implemented. But there are also good reasons why the Obama administration should, and may, allow state governments to proceed as voters have demanded.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_reasons_the_fed_shouldnt_crack_down_on_pot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_reasons_the_fed_shouldnt_crack_down_on_pot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End the war on weed!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot Legalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defying federal law, two states just legalized marijuana. A popular campaign forces Obama to take a stance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decades-long fight to end the Drug War - and specifically, the absurd war on marijuana - received a huge boost in the 2012 election, as Colorado and Washington became the first states to vote to legalize and regulate cannabis. Following those historic votes, a <a href="http://www.argojournal.com/2012/11/poll-watch-rasmussen-r-survey-on.html">new poll</a> shows the vast majority of Americans want states - not the federal government - to decide for themselves whether to legalize pot. Meanwhile, California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) took to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/11/jerry-brown-marijuana-laws_n_2113760.html">national television</a> to amplify the message of that poll, demanding that the federal government to respect states whose voters have spoken.</p><p>The problem, of course, is that the Obama administration may cite the 1970 Controlled Substances Act as statutory rationale to try to force states to continue an expensive and inhumane war on weed that unnecessarily arrests and incarcerates thousands of Americans each year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado&#8217;s pot business poised for boom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/colorados_pot_business_poised_for_boom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/colorados_pot_business_poised_for_boom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Post-legalization, the state's pre-existing, highly-regulated marijuana industry is set to go into overdrive]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" align="left" /></a> Colorado and Washington are currently <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/colorado-washington-await-federal-response-to-ballot-measures-approving-recreational-pot/2012/11/09/b04bbcde-2a8c-11e2-aaa5-ac786110c486_story.html" target="_blank">awaiting</a> the federal response to their citizens' votes this week to <a href="http://www.thefix.com/content/lcolorado-washington-marijuana-legalization90877" target="_blank">legalize marijuana</a> for recreational use. Meanwhile, Colorado's pre-existing, highly-regulated business structure for growing and selling (previously just medical) pot is set to <a href="http://nation.time.com/2012/11/09/marijuana-in-colorado-ready-for-business-complete-with-regulations/" target="_blank">go into overdrive</a>. The reassuring fact that strict oversight of medical marijuana was <em>already</em> in place played a big role in the eventual success of <a href="http://www.thefix.com/content/colorado-marijuana-legalization-vote90864" target="_blank">Amendment 64</a>; under current regulations, every step in the growing process is rigorously overseen and constantly filmed by video cameras monitored by the state’s Medical Marijuana Enforcement Division. No video blind spots are allowed, and truck shipments must detail the total weight of all marijuana products, in addition to the times of their arrival and departure. On top of that, every marijuana worker must be licensed. “The thing that Colorado really has going for it is that there is already a high level of comfort and familiarity with the state licensing, taxing and regulating the above-ground distribution of marijuana,” says <strong>Ethan Nadelmann</strong>, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. “People had become accustomed to the notion that this can be a source of tax revenue, and that police can play a role in insuring effective regulation rather than just arresting anyone they could.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/colorados_pot_business_poised_for_boom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/colorados_pot_business_poised_for_boom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s next for pot policy?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/whats_next_for_pot_policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/whats_next_for_pot_policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13064754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Public opinion on marijuana is moving fast, and pols will eventually follow. But "eventually" could be a while]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The election results this week from Washington, Colorado, Massachusetts and Arkansas demonstrate that public opinion about cannabis has moved much faster than the positions of elected officials. That Massachusetts voters would pass a fairly loosely regulated medical marijuana system isn’t very surprising. But that voters in Arkansas came within a whisker of passing one shows that it isn’t just a hippie-dippie issue anymore. And for Colorado and Washington to take the plunge into full legalization – not just of use or for medical purposes, but full-scale commercial growing and sales – marks an epoch.</p><p>There are two “What next?” questions: What happens at the ballot box two or four years from now? And what happens in Colorado and Washington over the next year or two? Neither question has a clear answer, but the political developments may be easier to forecast than the operational ones.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/whats_next_for_pot_policy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/whats_next_for_pot_policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana legalization in Colo., Wa. raise specter of weed tourism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/pot_votes_in_co_wa_raise_specter_of_weed_tourism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/pot_votes_in_co_wa_raise_specter_of_weed_tourism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marjiuana legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/pot_votes_in_co_wa_raise_specter_of_weed_tourism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the measures take effect, the two states may have opened the door to marijuana tourism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DENVER (AP) — Hit the slopes — and then a bong?</p><p>Marijuana legalization votes this week in Colorado and Washington state don't just set up an epic state-federal showdown on drug law for residents. The measures also open the door for marijuana tourism.</p><p>Both measures make marijuana possession in small amounts OK for all adults over 21. The measures affect not just state residents but visitors, too. Tourists may not be able to pack their bowls along with their bags, but as long as out-of-state tourists purchase and use the drug while in Colorado or Washington, they wouldn't violate the marijuana measures.</p><p>That's assuming the recreational marijuana measures take effect at all. That was very much in doubt Friday as the states awaited word on possible marijuana lawsuits from the federal government.</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517533417'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/pot_votes_in_co_wa_raise_specter_of_weed_tourism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/pot_votes_in_co_wa_raise_specter_of_weed_tourism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>