<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Washington Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/washington_post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ tracked movements, phone records of Fox reporter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/doj_tracked_movements_phone_records_of_fox_reporter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/doj_tracked_movements_phone_records_of_fox_reporter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james rosen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Jin-Woo Kim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probing leaks over North Korea, the government surveilled James Rosen's every contact with State Department]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following last week's revelations that the Justice Department had spied on AP reporters' phone records, a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/a-rare-peek-into-a-justice-department-leak-probe/2013/05/19/0bc473de-be5e-11e2-97d4-a479289a31f9_story.html">Washington Post report Monday</a> reveals that the government has gone even further to track journalists when investigating information leaks. In the case of Fox News' chief Washington correspondent James Rosen, the DOJ not only tracked his phone records, but obtained a warrant to view his personal emails and even obtained "security badge access records to track the reporter’s comings and goings from the State Department."</p><p>Based on information from a court affidavit, WaPo details how the government surveilled Rosen's every interaction with the State Department, suspecting that classified information about North Korea had been leaked to the reporter from State Department adviser Stephen Jin-Woo Kim.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/doj_tracked_movements_phone_records_of_fox_reporter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/doj_tracked_movements_phone_records_of_fox_reporter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the press too big to fail?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_the_press_too_big_to_fail_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_the_press_too_big_to_fail_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's media may be maddening, but the sobering truth is that there was no Golden Age of American journalism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows this story, though fewer and fewer read it on paper.  There are barely enough pages left to wrap fish.  The second paper in town has shut down.  Sometimes the daily delivers only three days a week.  Advertising long ago started fleeing to Craigslist and Internet points south.  Subscriptions are dwindling.  Online versions don’t bring in much ad revenue.  Who can avoid the obvious, if little covered question: Is the press too big to fail?  Or was it failing long before it began to falter financially?</p><p>In the previous century, there <em>was</em> a brief Golden Age of American journalism, though what glittered like gold leaf sometimes turned out to be tinsel.  Then came regression to the mean.  Since 2000, we have seen the titans of the news <a href="http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a1112121000sundaybush#a1112121000sundaybush" target="_blank">presuming</a> that Bush was the victor over Gore, <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2004/feb/26/now-they-tell-us/?pagination=false" target="_blank">hustling us</a> into war with Iraq, obscuring climate change, and turning blind eyes to derivatives, mortgage-based securities, collateralized debt obligations, and the other flimsy creations with which a vast, showy, ramshackle international financial house of cards was built.  When you think about the crisis of journalism, including the <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/165194/numbers-show-that-newspapers-are-indeed-doing-more-with-less/" target="_blank">loss of advertising</a> and the shriveled newsrooms -- there were <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/165194/numbers-show-that-newspapers-are-indeed-doing-more-with-less/" target="_blank">fewer newsroom employees</a> in 2010 than in 1978, when records were first kept -- also think of anesthetized watchdogs snoring on Wall Street while the Arctic ice cap melts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_the_press_too_big_to_fail_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_the_press_too_big_to_fail_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Rubin: Boston explosion a &#8220;local crime story&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/jenn_rubin_boston_explosion_a_local_crime_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/jenn_rubin_boston_explosion_a_local_crime_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative blogger takes the opportunity to make a point about abortion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the explosions at the Boston Marathon this afternoon, conservative Washington Post blogger Jennifer Rubin <a href="https://twitter.com/JRubinBlogger/status/323899061742735360">tweeted</a> that she wasn't going to write about the issue, because, "It is a local crime story for now."</p><p>The comment is a sarcastic reference to the Kermit Gosnell controversy, in which conservatives claim that the mainstream media has been covering up the horrific crimes of the Philadelphia doctor accused of performing illegal abortions. Her colleague at the Post, health policy reporter Sarah Kliff, tweeted last week that she wasn't writing about the case because, "I cover policy for the Washington Post, not local crime." The tweet <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2013/04/12/washington-post-reporter-gosnell-murders-just-a-local-crime-story/">prompted outrage</a> among pro-lifers.</p><p>Responding to Rubin on Twitter, numerous people <a href="https://twitter.com/JRubinBlogger/status/323899061742735360">criticized her</a> for politicizing the tragedy in Boston and dismissing its importance, even sarcastically. "Pathetic," conservative writer Justin Green responded.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/jenn_rubin_boston_explosion_a_local_crime_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/jenn_rubin_boston_explosion_a_local_crime_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun debate highlights everything awful about the U.S. Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/gun_debate_highlights_everything_awful_about_the_u_s_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/gun_debate_highlights_everything_awful_about_the_u_s_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Cillizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From awful punditry to filibuster hypocrisy, the debate over gun reform is the worst of American politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Washington Post reported yesterday evening that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gun-legislations-prospects-improve/2013/04/07/adea516e-9f92-11e2-9c03-6952ff305f35_print.html">"senators might be on the cusp of a breakthrough" on gun legislation,</a> after weeks of "stalled negotiations" leading to many observers pronouncing gun control doomed. (Though as Dave Weigel points out, <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/04/05/the_phantom_menace_that_could_kill_a_gun_control_bill.html">the "all gun legislation is in deep trouble"</a> idea arose mostly because Congress hasn't been in session and hence no work has been done on <em>any</em> legislation.) The savior: Pennsylvania Republican Pat Toomey, who is now negotiating with Democrat Joe Manchin, after it was determined that Oklahoma Republican Tom Coburn was not worth wasting any additional time on. Toomey, you see, needs to win reelection in Pennsylvania, so he is going to be more reasonable than someone who won't have to work very hard at all to win reelection in Oklahoma.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/gun_debate_highlights_everything_awful_about_the_u_s_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/gun_debate_highlights_everything_awful_about_the_u_s_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN passes historic arms trade treaty to U.S. media silence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/un_passes_historic_arms_trade_treaty_to_u_s_media_silence_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/un_passes_historic_arms_trade_treaty_to_u_s_media_silence_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No major broadcast network has made even passing mention of a treaty that curtails trafficking to war-torn nations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE UNITED NATIONS -- On the day the Arms Trade Treaty was scheduled to face a consensus vote by 193 countries, ending the years-long process to establish an international agreement to curtail arms trafficking to nations torn by conflict, I listened to a member of the Liberian delegation explain his country's concerns. "We wanted a much tighter treaty," he said, referring the large group of African countries most affected by the global black market arms trade. "Those of us who live in countries devastated by civil war very clearly understand the need for a strong regulatory framework to deter non-state actors from getting weapons. This is why we wanted a mechanism for risk-assessment, and why we wanted penalties."</p><p>Without the view from Liberia, it's hard to understand yesterday's headlines about the General Assembly's approval of the treaty. Which is why during two weeks of negotiations last month, African delegations could often be seen chatting with media from around the world. On the last day of the conference especially, the North Lawn building buzzed with reporters seeking perspectives. There were Russian and Arab TV crews, Japanese magazine journalists, and writers from at least half a dozen African publications. The U.S. media presence, hailing from the world's largest arms exporter, was harder to find. Which is to say, it was nearly impossible to find.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/un_passes_historic_arms_trade_treaty_to_u_s_media_silence_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/un_passes_historic_arms_trade_treaty_to_u_s_media_silence_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the &#8220;Peepal Conclave&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/take_a_peek_inside_the_peepal_conclave_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/take_a_peek_inside_the_peepal_conclave_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Monkey Cage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peeps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Papal Conclave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13227015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wanna see a diorama of 117 chick Peeps decked out in red felt cardinal suits? Of course you do]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Papal Conclave started today, with 115 cardinals flocking to the Sistine Chapel.  Faithful readers of the Monkey Cage are familiar with political science treatments of Papal elections: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/02/11/the-political-science-of-papal-elections/">here</a>, <a href="http://themonkeycage.org/blog/2013/02/11/temporal-omnipotence-or-how-even-the-pope-can-strategically-call-new-elections/">here</a>, <a href="http://themonkeycage.org/blog/2013/02/24/papal-ideology/">here</a> and <a href="http://themonkeycage.org/blog/2013/02/27/white-smoke-and-a-black-pope-is-turkson-the-churchs-future/">here</a>.  Now, just in time for balloting in both the Sistine Chapel and the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/peeps">Washington Post Peeps Contest</a>, you might enjoy this Binder-Maltzman (not Forrest) <a href="http://www.marshmallowpeeps.com/">Peeps</a> edition of the Papal Conclave, aka the Peepal Conclave.  (Warning: This birds-eye view is still under peep/peer review.)</p><p><a href="http://themonkeycage.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/smoke-small.png"><img src="http://themonkeycage.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/smoke-small.png" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/take_a_peek_inside_the_peepal_conclave_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/take_a_peek_inside_the_peepal_conclave_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Now it&#8217;s all about 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/obama_now_its_all_about_2014/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/obama_now_its_all_about_2014/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13217298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aware that the GOP won't deal, a report says the president's determined to take control of the House in 2014]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has apparently given up on the idea that the GOP majority in the House will work with him, Instead, he will actively work to elect a Democratic majority in 2014,<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/stymied-by-a-gop-house-obama-looks-ahead-to-2014-to-cement-his-legacy/2013/03/02/5f6f8b94-827d-11e2-a350-49866afab584_print.html"> according to a story</a> in Sunday's Washington Post.</p><p>The Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/stymied-by-a-gop-house-obama-looks-ahead-to-2014-to-cement-his-legacy/2013/03/02/5f6f8b94-827d-11e2-a350-49866afab584_print.html">reports </a>that almost immediately after his re-election, Obama began working behind the scenes to win back the lower chamber and attempt to secure his legacy. The plan, the paper suggests, is to nationalize the 2014 race around issues which have popular public appeal -- gun control, immigration reform, the minimum wage, climate change and others -- but little chance of moving through the House.</p><p>Obama used his State of the Union to begin to build support for his agenda, and has continued in campaign mode over recent weeks to illustrate the effects of the sequester cuts on the economy. The Post says he'll continue to voice his frustration that popular legislation can't move through the House.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/obama_now_its_all_about_2014/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/obama_now_its_all_about_2014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media controversy of the day: Washington Post reporter pro-gay</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/media_controversy_of_the_day_washington_post_reporter_pro_gay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/media_controversy_of_the_day_washington_post_reporter_pro_gay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reporter says he's biased in favor of gay rights, conservatives demand "objectivity"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal bias alert: A Washington Post reporter said he's cool with gay people. Conservatives are furious!</p><p>OK, it's a bit more complicated than that. The Post's ombudsman, Patrick Pexton, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/patrick-pexton-is-the-post-pro-gay/2013/02/22/fab8235c-7c53-11e2-a044-676856536b40_story.html">ran a column with a classic ombud headline,</a> "Is the Post 'pro-gay'?" A reader got into a "vigorous three-way e-mail dialogue" with Pexton and a Post reporter, with the reader claiming the Post "caters slavishly to Dupont Circle," a reference to a wealthy Washington, D.C., neighborhood known for its many LGBT residents and also a claim that I bet the Post's advertising team would be happy to add to its pitches.</p><p>The reporter and the reader had an argument about the purpose of journalism:</p><blockquote><p>Replied the reporter: “The reason that legitimate media outlets routinely cover gays is because it is the civil rights issue of our time. Journalism, at its core, is about justice and fairness, and that’s the ‘view of the world’ that we espouse; therefore, journalists are going to cover the segment of society that is still not treated equally under the law.”</p> <p>The reader: “Contrary to what you say, the mission of journalism is not justice. Defining justice is a political matter, not journalistic. Journalism should be about accuracy and fairness.</p> <p>“Good journalism also means not demeaning conservatives as ‘haters.’ ”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/media_controversy_of_the_day_washington_post_reporter_pro_gay/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/media_controversy_of_the_day_washington_post_reporter_pro_gay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Counterterror rulebook exempts drone war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/counterterror_rulebook_exempts_drone_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/counterterror_rulebook_exempts_drone_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disposition Matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterterrorism playbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13177132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The manual on targeted killing includes no guidelines for drone attacks in Pakistan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of its continuing series on the Obama administration's targeted killing program, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-drone-strikes-will-get-pass-in-counterterrorism-playbook-officials-say/2013/01/19/ca169a20-618d-11e2-9940-6fc488f3fecd_story.html">Washington Post reported</a> Saturday that a proposed manual of rules for counterterrorism programs is near completion. However, according to the Post,  the manual "leaves open a major exemption for the CIA’s campaign of drone strikes in Pakistan, U.S. officials said."</p><p>In previous reports about the proposed Manual, the Post's Miller noted that the codification of kill lists and other current counterterror practices into a manual illustrates that programs once considered emergency post-9/11 measures have been crystallized as permanent fixtures of our national security apparatus. Miller, Ellen Nakashima and Karen DeYoung repeated this point Saturday:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/counterterror_rulebook_exempts_drone_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/counterterror_rulebook_exempts_drone_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CIA&#8217;s expanding contractor security force</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_cias_expanding_contractor_security_force/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_cias_expanding_contractor_security_force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global response staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global Response Staff, a secret security force created after 9/11, is illustrative of CIA militarization]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Washington Post on Friday<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cias-global-response-staff-emerging-from-shadows-after-incidents-in-libya-and-pakistan/2012/12/26/27db2d1c-4b7f-11e2-b709-667035ff9029_story.html"> published</a> another revealing report on the U.S.'s sprawling intelligence operations overseas. Greg Miller and Julie Tate reported on the CIA's Global Response Staff (GRS) --  a secret security force created after 9/11 which recruits "hundreds of former U.S. Special Forces operatives to serve as armed guards for the agency’s spies."</p><p>It was the GRS who were swift to the scene to fend off a second attack by militants on the U.S. consulate in Libya in September. Largely constituted of contractors working part of the year for substantial fees (up to $140,000), the GRS is one of the most dangerous assignments in the CIA's increasingly far-reaching tentacles. At any one time, around 125 GRS contractors are assigned around the world and, as the Post noted, "Of the 14 CIA employees killed since 2009, five worked for the GRS, all as contractors. They include two killed at Benghazi, as well as three others who were within the blast radius on Dec. 31, 2009, when a <a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-06-28/world/35234334_1_cia-base-vests-bomber" data-xslt="_http">Jordanian double agent detonated a suicide bomb</a> at a CIA compound in Khost, Afghanistan."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_cias_expanding_contractor_security_force/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_cias_expanding_contractor_security_force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E.L. James named publishing person of the year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/e_l_james_named_publishing_person_of_the_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/e_l_james_named_publishing_person_of_the_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifty Shades of Grey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critic Ron Charles is appalled]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publishers Weekly has pronounced "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Fifty-Shades-Grey-Book-Trilogy/dp/0345803485/saloncom08-20">Fifty Shades of Grey</a>" novelist E.L. James the publishing person of the year, a decision about as shocking as her books' brand of light bondage. Still, it wouldn't be publishing if there wasn't a bit of righteous indignation. Fortunately the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/arts-post/post/el-james-publishing-person-of-the-year/2012/12/03/8dae8adc-3d86-11e2-ae43-cf491b837f7b_blog.html">Washington Post</a>'s "totally hip book reviewer"  Ron Charles wears his lightly. Still, if he had a grave he'd be spinning in it.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Hqy8zAdfNEU?list=UUJAn03-_nxsWRIjMVvn-pBQ&amp;hl=en_US" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/e_l_james_named_publishing_person_of_the_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/e_l_james_named_publishing_person_of_the_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does anyone want Medicare cuts?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/does_anyone_want_medicare_cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/does_anyone_want_medicare_cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll reveals that 68 percent of conservatives oppose slicing the health care program for seniors]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> One of the more interesting results in yesterday’s <em>Washington Post</em>/ABC News <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/polling/postabc-poll-support-reducing-nations-budget/2012/11/28/083a0a26-3952-11e2-9258-ac7c78d5c680_page.html">poll</a>, as the <em>Post</em>'s Greg Sargent <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/the-morning-plum-can-obama-change-washington-from-the-outside/2012/11/28/3e636eec-394f-11e2-b01f-5f55b193f58f_blog.html">alluded</a> to this morning, is the overwhelming opposition to Medicare cuts from Republican voters. Sixty-eight percent of self-identified Republicans—and 68 percent of self-identified <em>conservatives</em>—oppose cuts to the health-care program for seniors.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/does_anyone_want_medicare_cuts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/does_anyone_want_medicare_cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can we stop worshipping American generals now?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/can_we_stop_worshipping_american_generals_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/can_we_stop_worshipping_american_generals_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gen. Stanley McChrystal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those devastated by Petraeus' fall from grace, here's a newsflash: We enabled him with our sycophancy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few things have characterized the post-9/11 American world more than our worshipful embrace of our generals. They’ve become our heroes, our sports stars, and our celebrities all rolled into one. We can’t stop <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174924/engelhardt_falling_upwards" target="_blank">gushing about them</a>. Even after his recent <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175619" target="_blank">fall from grace</a>, General David Petraeus was still being celebrated by CNN as the best American general <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/10/opinion/bergen-petraeus-legacy/index.html" target="_blank">since Dwight D. Eisenhower</a> (and let’s not forget that Ike commanded the largest amphibious invasion in history and held a fractious coalition together in a total war against Nazi Germany). Before <em>his</em> fall from grace, Afghan War Commander General Stanley McChrystal was similarly lauded as <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5344967n" target="_blank">one tough customer</a>, a sort of <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175074/the_pressure_of_an_expanding_war" target="_blank">superman-saint</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/can_we_stop_worshipping_american_generals_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/can_we_stop_worshipping_american_generals_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s nation-building hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/americas_nation_building_hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/americas_nation_building_hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bahrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For all the talk of starting at home, the US is still pouring billions into the Middle East. When will it stop?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A billion dollars from the federal government: that kind of money could go a long way toward revitalizing a country’s aging infrastructure.  It could provide housing or better water and sewer systems.  It could enhance a transportation network or develop an urban waterfront.  It could provide local jobs.  It could do any or all of these things.  And, in fact, it did.  It just happened to be in the Middle East, not the United States.</p><p>The Pentagon awarded $667.2 million in contracts in 2012, and more than $1 billion during Barack Obama’s first term in office for construction projects in largely autocratic Middle Eastern nations, according to figures provided to TomDispatch by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Middle East District (USACE-MED).  More than $178 million in similar funding is already anticipated for 2013.  These contracts represent a mix of projects, including expanding and upgrading military bases used by U.S. troops in the region, building facilities for indigenous security forces, and launching infrastructure projects meant to improve the lives of local populations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/americas_nation_building_hypocrisy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/americas_nation_building_hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. energy independence is a pipe dream</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/u_s_energy_independence_is_a_pipe_dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/u_s_energy_independence_is_a_pipe_dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13030183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oil operations are growing in North America, but don't expect it to supplant the Middle East any time soon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last winter, fossil-fuel enthusiasts began trumpeting the dawn of a new “golden age of oil” that would kick-start the American economy, generate millions of new jobs, and free this country from its dependence on imported petroleum.  Ed Morse, head commodities analyst at Citibank, was typical.  In the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> he <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304459804577285972222946812.html" target="_blank">crowed</a>, “The United States has become the fastest-growing oil and gas producer in the world, and is likely to remain so for the rest of this decade and into the 2020s.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/u_s_energy_independence_is_a_pipe_dream/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/u_s_energy_independence_is_a_pipe_dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida slipping away for Mitt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/florida_slipping_away_for_mitt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/florida_slipping_away_for_mitt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13022331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the former Massachusetts governor can't recover in this critical swing state, it's game over for his candidacy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney has a few paths to victory, some more likely than others. He could repeat George W. Bush’s performance in 2004 and carry the White House with wins in Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, and Ohio. He could cede Virginia to Obama and take Colorado and New Hampshire. He could give up Colorado and New Hampshire but win Wisconsin and the single electoral vote in Omaha, Nebraska. He could lose Ohio and make up for it with Virginia, Colorado, and Wisconsin.</p><p>But what Romney can’t do—under any remotely plausible scenario—is win the White House without Florida. Take Florida away from Romney, and he doesn’t have a path to 270 electoral votes that doesn’t involve winning a traditional blue state. Mitt Romney could <em>run the table</em>, win New Hampshire, Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Colorado, and still fall short of 270 electoral votes. To win, he’d have to overcome a year-long, seven-point deficit in Nevada, which—on top of everything else—is not something I’d bet money on.</p><p>For most of the year, Florida has been a toss-up, with both candidates claiming short-lived leads. Since the conventions, however, the state has begun to slip out of reach for the former Massachusetts governor. In the 15 polls taken before the conventions, Romney led in six:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/florida_slipping_away_for_mitt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/florida_slipping_away_for_mitt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post fact checker calls torture-loving Washington Post columnist a liar</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/washington_post_fact_checker_calls_torture_loving_washington_post_columnist_a_liar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/washington_post_fact_checker_calls_torture_loving_washington_post_columnist_a_liar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fact checking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Thiessen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13021645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newspaper's resident truth vigilante gives the Post's Marc Thiessen three Pinocchios]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/the-bogus-claim-that-obama-skips-his-intelligence-briefings/2012/09/23/100cb63e-04fc-11e2-8102-ebee9c66e190_blog.html">awarded "three Pinocchios"</a> -- out of a possible four -- to an anti-Obama attack ad based on a claim made, in the Washington Post, by columnist Marc Thiessen. Kessler then updated his post to say that Thiessen's defense of the ad and his original column was dishonest and nearly worthy of a fourth Pinocchio.</p><p>When you, the major daily newspaper, get to the point where your official in-house fact checker is not just calling one of your columnists dishonest but also practically mocking his arguments as ridiculous, maybe you should reconsider some of your hiring strategies. (Knowing the Post it will probably choose <em>more</em> dishonest former presidential speechwriters and <em>fewer</em> "fact checkers.") This is different from being taken to task by an ombudsman or public editor; they're quasi-independent entities hired specifically to criticize the paper. This is the newspaper's <em>official arbiter of truthfulness</em> saying a paid Washington Post columnist is not just a liar but a shitty one.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/washington_post_fact_checker_calls_torture_loving_washington_post_columnist_a_liar/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/washington_post_fact_checker_calls_torture_loving_washington_post_columnist_a_liar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Atlantic making us stupid?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/is_the_atlantic_making_us_stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/is_the_atlantic_making_us_stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alec Baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilary Rosen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13006903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The magazine's features are always engaging but often seem to lack critical historical perspective]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JAMES BENNET WANTS US to have a conversation. The editor-in-chief of <em>The Atlantic</em>, who took the helm in 2006, has overseen a remarkable rise in the magazine’s fortunes and profile. He has turned <em>The Atlantic </em>from a money bleeder into a moneymaker, from a worthy but familiar cultural artifact into a brand chattered about by people who are not usually considered part of the chattering class. And what gets the most chatter of all are <em>The Atlantic</em>’s frequent, and frequently controversial, articles about gender issues.</p><p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a> This summer, despite (or because of) the clichéd cover image of a toddler stuffed into a woman’s briefcase, Anne-Marie Slaughter’s “<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/07/why-women-still-cant-have-it-all/309020/">Why Women Still Can’t Have It All</a>” was an instant sensation, attracting 1.7 million visitors to <em>The Atlantic’</em>s website and generating an all-time high of 200,000 Facebook recommendations. Other attention getters: Kate Bolick’s “<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/11/all-the-single-ladies/308654/?single_page=true">All the Single Ladies</a>” (November 2011), an exploration of the current state of unmarried womanhood; Lori Gottlieb’s “<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/03/marry-him/306651/">Marry Him!</a>” (March 2008), an argument that women should settle for Mr. So-So lest they end up like Kate Bolick; Hanna Rosin’s “<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/308135/?single_page=true">The End of Men</a>” (July/August 2010), which presented evidence that women are outstripping men in higher education and on the job market; Rosin’s self-explanatory “<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/04/the-case-against-breast-feeding/307311/?single_page=true">The Case Against Breast-Feeding</a>” (April 2009); and Gottlieb’s “<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/07/how-to-land-your-kid-in-therapy/308555/?single_page=true">How to Land Your Kid in Therapy</a>” (July/August 2011), an indictment of so-called helicopter parenting. These stories have sparked lively and sometimes anguished responses in other magazines, newspapers, and popular blogs, as well as on Facebook, over lunches, and during book-group get-togethers. Four of them have sparked book deals (for Gottlieb, Rosin, Bolick, and Slaughter), and CBS has purchased a sitcom based on Bolick’s meditation on the single life.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/is_the_atlantic_making_us_stupid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/is_the_atlantic_making_us_stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Washington Post&#8217;s &#8220;Newt U&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/newt_university_quietly_brought_to_you_by_the_washington_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/newt_university_quietly_brought_to_you_by_the_washington_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12993519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Newt University" uses an innovative new product from the Washington Post Co.'s educational cash cow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call up Sallie Mae and take out some non-dischargable loans, because <a href="http://www.newtuniversity.com/">Newt University is in session!</a> Gingrich, in partnership with the Republican National Committee, is hosting a series of "policy classes" for Republican Convention delegates in Tampa this week. (Today's classes feature guest-lecturer Larry Kudlow, in what I am guessing involves a creative application of NBC News' ethics policies.) Oh, and "Newt U" will also be available online, thanks to <a href="http://www.politico.com/playbook/">"a new learning technology platform pioneered by Kaplan Inc called KAPx."</a></p><p>According to <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120824005592/en/Kaplan-Offers-Beta-Version-KAPx%E2%84%A2-Online-Educational">a Kaplan press release</a>, KAPx (which seems to be just Google+ Hangouts meant to be sold to learning institutions at a high markup):</p><blockquote><p>“The KAPx™ platform is designed to help schools, organizations, businesses, and individuals who want to share information and knowledge in an exciting, interactive, and highly participatory manner that is aligned with the best instructional practices,” said Edward Hanapole, Kaplan Inc.’s Chief Information Officer. “We will continue to refine the platform to reflect our leadership in learning science and how to marry technological innovation with educational achievement.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/newt_university_quietly_brought_to_you_by_the_washington_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/newt_university_quietly_brought_to_you_by_the_washington_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney shill&#8217;s amazing Clinton spin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/romney_shills_amazing_clinton_spin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/romney_shills_amazing_clinton_spin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12976018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jennifer Rubin thinks it is horrible news for Obama that our most popular living ex-president supports him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/obamas-welfare-debacle/2012/08/08/02aa2f24-e154-11e1-98e7-89d659f9c106_blog.html">Astute campaign analysis</a> from the Washington Post's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/02/jennifer_rubin_mitt_romneys_top_media_shill/">fiercely independent</a> conservative blogger Jennifer Rubin: A news event that seems to be a misstep by Romney is in fact a thrilling Romney victory that has Obama cowering with fear.</p><p>Here in reality, Mitt Romney seized on a misleading right-wing talking point about an obscure TANF policy change from Barack Obama's Department of Health and Human Services and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/romney_tries_out_a_welfare_attack/">used it to create a blatantly dishonest attack ad</a> (and stump speech attack line). Then, still in this reality, Bill Clinton, whose name and image were invoked in the Romney attack ad, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/bubba_and_blowback/">released a statement saying plainly that Romney's ad was dishonest</a>. Bill Clinton remains broadly popular nationally, because his time as president was a time of relative prosperity for many Americans, which is why the Democrats have given him a prime speaking slot at their upcoming convention. The last Republican president, by the way, won't be speaking at the Republican convention. In fact, he won't even attend.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/romney_shills_amazing_clinton_spin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/romney_shills_amazing_clinton_spin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
