<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Watergate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/watergate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Whitewater all over again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/recent_scandals_are_whitewater_redux_not_watergate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/recent_scandals_are_whitewater_redux_not_watergate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandalgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Joe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's "scandals" are not like Nixon's. They're a fishing expedition to stop his agenda and find something bigger]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always disheartening when Bob Woodward shows up on our televisions. As a dashing young investigative reporter at the Washington Post, Woodward was part of an intrepid team whose reporting revealed that President Richard Nixon had personally directed a cover-up of crimes that were paid for by his reelection committee and executed against his political enemies.</p><p>Watching the Woodward of today pimp his personal brand on cable TV — call it <em>innuendo with gravitas </em>— is something like seeing a former Hall of Famer dispense motivational tips at a business seminar in Topeka.</p><p>And yet no event is more emblematic of our historical moment than Woodward’s appearance last week on Morning Joe, an MSNBC program devoted to the promotion of overpriced coffee, with a side dish of political hype.</p><p>Asked about the various “scandals” confronting the Obama administration, Woodward dutifully hit his mark. “I know there have been these comparisons to Watergate,” he told host Joe Scarborough. “I would say not yet, Joe … You’ve got to investigate all of these things.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/recent_scandals_are_whitewater_redux_not_watergate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/recent_scandals_are_whitewater_redux_not_watergate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please stop comparing things to Watergate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Benghazigate to Pastagate, the Watergate comparisons have gotten out of hand and need to stop]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benghazi is back in the news today with a House Oversight Committee hearing, and that means Watergate is too. Because 40 years later, anything and everything gets compared to Watergate for some reason. It has to stop.</p><p>Here's Tea Party Rep. Steve Stockman -- "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/steve_stockman_the_new_michele_bachmann/">the New Michele Bachmann</a>" -- today:</p><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>You could call <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23Benghazi">#Benghazi</a> Obama's Watergate, except no one died.</p> <p>— Rep. Steve Stockman (@SteveWorks4You) <a href="https://twitter.com/SteveWorks4You/status/332175444306710529">May 8, 2013</a></p></blockquote><p>Mike Huckabee echoed the sentiment on Sunday, saying Benghazi <a href="http://nation.foxnews.com/benghazi/2013/05/08/huckabee-benghazi-will-be-obama-s-watergate">will be Obama's Watergate</a> or worse because, "as bad as Watergate was -- because it broke the trust between the president and the people -- no one died." But Huckabee and Stockman are just cribbing John McCain, who's been <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/18/nbcs-david-gregory-defend_n_863660.html">saying the same thing</a> since October. Naturally, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and the rest of the crew at Fox News are <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/05/08/the-fox-news-campaign-to-tie-benghazi-to-waterg/193966">all over the comparison</a> as well</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Nixon, hero of the American Left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/i_was_a_nixon_junkie_defending_the_20th_centurys_most_misunderstood_president_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/i_was_a_nixon_junkie_defending_the_20th_centurys_most_misunderstood_president_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's justifiably reviled by historians, but Nixon's politics were far more progressive than we give him credit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1_sm.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a></p><blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p> <p><em>Sometimes I have succeeded and sometimes I have failed, but always I have taken heart from what Theodore Roosevelt once said about the man in the arena, "whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes short again and again because there is not effort without error and shortcoming, but who does actually strive to do the deed, who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumphs of high achievements and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly."</em></p> <p><em></em>— Richard Nixon, August 8, 1974</p></blockquote><p>¤</p><p>ON APRIL 27, 1994, outside a small home in Yorba Linda, California, President William Jefferson Clinton delivered the final eulogy at the funeral of Richard Milhous Nixon. At first, the speech seemed to abide by the unspoken rules of decorum that had informed every eulogy before it: praise the former president in broad terms; highlight his triumphs in foreign policy. Pay homage to his enviable family life. Do not, under any circumstances, say “Watergate.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/i_was_a_nixon_junkie_defending_the_20th_centurys_most_misunderstood_president_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/i_was_a_nixon_junkie_defending_the_20th_centurys_most_misunderstood_president_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Like Watergate never happened</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/like_watergate_never_happened_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/like_watergate_never_happened_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerald Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sy Hersh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forty years after Nixon was effectively brought to justice, the public no longer holds its government accountable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At moments, "The Lessons of Watergate" conference held a couple of weeks ago in Washington, D.C., by the citizen’s lobby Common Cause, was a little like that two-man roadshow retired baseball players Bill Buckner and Mookie Wilson have been touring. In it, they retell the story of the catastrophic moment during the bottom of the last inning of Game Six of the 1986 World Series, when the Mets’ Wilson hit an easy ground ball toward Buckner of the Red Sox, who haplessly let it roll between his legs. That notorious error ultimately cost Boston the championship.</p><p>As the New Yorker magazine’s Reeves Wiedeman wrote of the players’ joint public appearance, ''It is as if Custer and Sitting Bull agreed to deconstruct Little Bighorn.” Or those World War II reunions where aging Army Air Corps men meet the Luftwaffe pilots who tried to shoot them down over Bremen.</p><p>So, too, in Washington, four decades after the Watergate break-in scandal that led to the downfall of President Richard Nixon. Up onstage was Daniel Ellsberg of Pentagon Papers fame, one of the first victims of Nixon’s infamous “plumbers,” the burglars who went skulking into the night to attempt illegal break-ins – including one at the office of Ellsberg’s psychiatrist.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/like_watergate_never_happened_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/like_watergate_never_happened_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Reich: We&#8217;ve forgotten the lessons of Watergate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/robert_reich_weve_forgotten_the_lessons_of_watergate_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/robert_reich_weve_forgotten_the_lessons_of_watergate_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Reich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former secretary of labor says that increased transparency is now a thing of the past]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p><article id="post-26515">At the National Press Club, the citizen’s lobby Common Cause held a <a href="http://www.commoncause.org/site/pp.asp?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&amp;b=8601105">conference commemorating the 40th anniversary of Watergate</a>. Kicking off the conference was economist Robert Reich, former secretary of labor under President Clinton. In this audio exclusive at the event, Moyers and Company senior writer <a href="http://billmoyers.com/author/winshipm/">Michael Winship</a> talks with Reich about the ways in which Washington has changed since Watergate and how the influence of money continues to corrupt politics and exacerbates the crisis of income inequality in America.<iframe src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F83269285" frameborder="no" scrolling="no" width="100%" height="166"></iframe>At the conference, Reich said that despite the crisis, America’s response to Watergate was, in many respects, “a huge success … Watergate should be considered a moment when government showed its resilience.” In the wake of wrongdoing by the president and those closest to him, Reich argued, the rest of the government and the American people rose to the occasion in the way our democracy’s founders would have hoped. There was campaign finance reform, increased transparency and limits placed on presidential power but, he added, in recent years, much of what was accomplished post-Watergate has come undone.</article><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/robert_reich_weve_forgotten_the_lessons_of_watergate_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/robert_reich_weve_forgotten_the_lessons_of_watergate_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Bork is dead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/robert_bork_is_dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/robert_bork_is_dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Bork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard M. Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The man whose failed Supreme Court nomination inspired cultural fights over civil rights for decades has died at 85]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARLINGTON, Va. (AP) — Robert H. Bork, who stepped in to fire the Watergate prosecutor at Richard Nixon's behest and whose failed 1980s nomination to the Supreme Court helped draw the modern boundaries of cultural fights over abortion, civil rights and other issues, has died. He was 85.</p><p>Son Robert H. Bork Jr. confirmed the death Wednesday. His father had a long career in politics and the law that took him from respected academic to a totem of conservative grievance.</p><p>Bork was accused of being a partisan hatchet man for Nixon when he fired Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox in the Saturday Night Massacre of 1973.</p><p>Bork's drubbing during the 1987 Senate nomination hearings made him a hero to the right and a rallying cry for younger conservatives.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/robert_bork_is_dead/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/robert_bork_is_dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s scandal envy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/gops_scandal_envy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/gops_scandal_envy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Graham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are calling for a "Watergate-style" investigation of Benghazi. Why can't they see it's not the same?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> If you're looking at the Republican harumphing over Benghazi and asking yourself, "Why are we supposed to be so mad about this again?" you're not alone. Let's review: There was an attack on our consulate that killed four Americans, including our ambassador. Amid confusing and contradictory reports from the ground, President Obama waited too long to utter the magic incantation, "Terrorism, terrorists, terror!" that would have ... well, it would have done something, but it turns out that he did say "terror," so never mind that. But that's not the real scandal! The real scandal is that Susan Rice went on television soon after and amid all kinds of "based on the best information we have"s and "we'll have to see"s, said one thing that turned out not to be the case: that after the protests in Cairo, there was some kind of copycat protest in Benghazi, which was then "hijacked" by extremist elements using heavy weapons to stage an attack.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/gops_scandal_envy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/gops_scandal_envy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatever it takes, get out and vote!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/whatever_it_takes_get_out_and_vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/whatever_it_takes_get_out_and_vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't let Hurricane Sandy rob you of your Democratic voice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A week has passed since Hurricane Sandy struck, and the short subway ride uptown this morning almost seemed normal, except for the bigger crowds getting on at Penn Station and Times Square — commuters from outside Manhattan where wind and storm surge water damage were so much worse and all too often deadly. Overheard conversations were filled with stories of how people had coped.</p><p>I live in <a href="https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&amp;oe=UTF8&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=100720666322688312312.000457945f601f69a3624">Greenwich Village</a> and thought I was ready for the worst — hatches battened down with emergency food, water, batteries, flashlights, transistor radio, etc. I’ve stayed put through 9/11, blackouts, blizzards, even other hurricanes. Nonetheless, I wasn’t prepared for the electricity and heat leaving us for five nights. I thought for sure they would be back the next day. Or the next … or the next…</p><p>But we were stuck in that trendy new Manhattan neighborhood — SoPo, as in “South of Power” — and when a friend and colleague offered shelter, warmth and electricity on the upper West Side, the invitation was gratefully accepted. From that outpost (for the most part, life went on as usual once you got above 34th Street and Herald Square), we watched unfold the disaster and accompanying tragedies and acts of heroism and community.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/whatever_it_takes_get_out_and_vote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/whatever_it_takes_get_out_and_vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watergate&#8217;s final mystery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/watergates_final_mystery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/watergates_final_mystery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12914383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Underneath the media's obsession with the scandal lies the neglected story of the CIA's role ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalists are obsessing over Watergate again. Debate exploded this week over a new biography of Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee, excerpted in  <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/ben-bradlee-2012-5/">New York</a> magazine. It suggests the legendary editor privately doubted aspects of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein's reporting that helped bring about the resignation of President Richard Nixon in 1974.</p><p>The story prompted a <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75732.html#.T54XtF-jptE.twitter">strong denial</a> from Woodward, a demurral from Bradlee, an <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/top-stories/172465/live-chat-today-dylan-byers-jack-shafer-explain-reporting-behind-new-watergate-claims/">online chat at Poynter</a> and a <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/01/new-questions-about-deep-throat-in-all-the-president-s-men-watergate-revisited.html">Daily Beast story</a> by independent scholar Max Holland, who argues Woodward and Bernstein's book about the scandal, "All the President's Men," is "a fairly tale, albeit a compelling one." After hyping the story for a couple of days, Politico then dismissed it as <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75770.html">"a storm in a Washington teacup."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/watergates_final_mystery/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/watergates_final_mystery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://nixontapeaudio.org/rmh/025-071.mp3" length="1680664" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://nixontapeaudio.org/rmh/587-007a.mp3" length="50953037" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
