<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > WikiLeaks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/wikileaks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Adrian Lamo opens up about life after turning in Bradley Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adrian lamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an IM chat with the Guardian, Lamo defends informing on the soldier, ponders the impossibility of hindsight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Guardian Thursday <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/03/adrian-lamo-bradley-manning-q-and-ahttp://">published a fascinating IM interview </a>with Adrian Lamo, the hacker-turned-journalist and minister who famously turned Bradley Manning in to the Department of Defense after the young soldier confided in Lamo through online chats.</p><p>Lamo's elegant responses show a man attempting to detach himself from the realities of Manning's harsh detention and worrying legal prospects. They also show a man with enough philosophical soundness to reject questions about acting with hindsight.</p><p>Lamo told the Guardian's Ed Pilkington that he has not closely followed Manning's recent pretrial hearings:</p><blockquote><p>It's not because I take it lightly, but because I take it as seriously as I do. Making the choice to interdict a man's freedom knowing it could mean his life, is something that's easy to judge but can only really be understood by living it. You either fold it into your character, come to terms and go on with your life, or you get stuck in that moment forever. For a while I thought I would be. I took it badly. But I came to terms and continued my life some time ago. It has, after all, been two years.</p> <p>... I knew my actions might cost him his life. In that respect, any other outcome is preferable.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assange praises Bradley Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/assange_praises_bradley_manning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/assange_praises_bradley_manning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a rare appearance, the Wikileaks founder promised more releases, and said Manning had "maintained his dignity"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange emerged for a rare public address Thursday, praising jailed U.S. soldier Bradley Manning in an address delivered from the balcony of the Ecuadorean Embassy in London.</p><p>Addressing supporters on a cold and wet English evening, the 41-year-old Australian looked fit and healthy despite half a year spent in trapped inside the small apartment he shares with Ecuador's diplomatic staff.</p><p>He gave no hint that he would end the standoff, which has seen him spend six months as a fugitive from European justice, saying he was holed up at the embassy for fear of the U.S. investigation into his activities.</p><p>"While this immoral investigation continues, and while the Australian government will not defend the journalism and publishing of WikiLeaks, I must remain here," he said.</p><p>While the U.S. Justice Department has launched an investigation into WikiLeaks' spectacular disclosures of U.S. secrets, Assange is currently wanted by police over allegations of sexual assault stemming from a trip to Sweden in mid-2010.</p><p>Many WikiLeaks supporters have suggested that the allegations are a ploy to extradite Assange, first to Sweden and then to the U.S. The Swedish government and Assange's alleged victims deny it, saying they are simply seeking justice.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/assange_praises_bradley_manning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/assange_praises_bradley_manning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Julian Assange wants to run for office</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/julian_assange_wants_to_run_for_office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/julian_assange_wants_to_run_for_office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuador]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WikiLeaks founder plans to form a party and run for the Australian Senate next year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Australian news sources, Julian Assange plans to run for a seat in the Australian Senate in 2013 under the banner of the "WikilLeaks Party." News site <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/world/julian-assange-the-fugitive-20121212-2b9r4.html">the Age reported </a>that Assange has said plans for registering the party were "significantly advanced" and that “a number of very worthy people admired by the Australian public” have expressed interest in standing on the WikiLeaks ticket.</p><p>Unsurprisingly, Assange said the party platform would push for greater government transparency and against creeping intrusions on individual privacy. "<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/assange-looks-to-contest-senate-election-20121212-2ba43.html">Polls inside Australia show</a> that Assange could conceivably stand a chance of winning in either New South Wales or Victoria," the Age noted.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/julian_assange_wants_to_run_for_office/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/julian_assange_wants_to_run_for_office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manning&#8217;s lawyer: My client was kept like &#8220;a zoo animal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/mannings_lawyer_my_client_was_kept_like_a_zoo_animal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/mannings_lawyer_my_client_was_kept_like_a_zoo_animal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Coombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistelblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Meade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pretrial hearing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his closing pretrial argument, attorney David Coombs decried the military's refusal to listen to psychiatrists ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the closing arguments Tuesday in a motion on Pfc. Bradley Manning's pretrial detention conditions, Manning's attorney said his client was kept like "a zoo animal."</p><p>"The conditions that Manning was under, they can only equate to death row detainees," said the soldier's attorney, David Coombs. "If the Quantico brig could have put him in a straitjacket in a padded room and not had anybody complain, they would have." Manning's defense is claiming that the accused whistle-blower was subjected to unlawful pre-trial punishment, and are calling for all charges against the soldier to be dismissed as a result.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/mannings_lawyer_my_client_was_kept_like_a_zoo_animal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/mannings_lawyer_my_client_was_kept_like_a_zoo_animal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you face charges for reposting a link?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/can_you_face_charges_for_reposting_a_link/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/can_you_face_charges_for_reposting_a_link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrett Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stratfor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the charges facing Anonymous "spokesman" Barrett Brown, copying a hyperlink to hacked information]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barrett Brown, the once self-appointed spokesman to hacker collective Anonymous, was <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/115935232/Barrett-Brown-Indictment-No-2">indicted last week</a> by a federal grand jury on 12 charges related to the infamous Stratfor hack. Unlike activist Jeremy Hammond, who could <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/judge_in_hacker_case_is_married_to_a_stratfor_client/">face life in prison </a>for his alleged role hacking the private intelligence firm, Brown's charges specifically pertain to the sharing of information, a development that has perturbed journalists and bloggers who regularly report on hackers and hacked information.</p><p>Brown faces a host of charges, including a number relating to online threats made to an FBI agent unrelated to the Stratfor case. Within the newly announced grand jury indictment, however, Brown faces a charge for copying a link to a downloadable archive of compromised data -- specifically credit card information -- from one Internet Relay Chat (IRC) channel and pasting it into another.</p><p>The indictment states:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/can_you_face_charges_for_reposting_a_link/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/can_you_face_charges_for_reposting_a_link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jailer: Bradley Manning needed to tell me he wanted out of solitary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/jailer_bradley_manning_needed_to_tell_me_he_wanted_out_of_solitary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/jailer_bradley_manning_needed_to_tell_me_he_wanted_out_of_solitary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The officer says the alleged source of Wikileaks documents was stripped naked every night for his own good]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Army private charged with sending reams of classified documents to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks could have gotten his tight pretrial confinement conditions reduced by clearly explaining why he wasn't a suicide risk, the former commander of a Marine Corps brig testified Friday.</p><p>When Pfc. Bradley Manning did speak up, his crack about hanging himself with his underwear only heightened the concern for his safety, Chief Warrant Officer 2 Denise Barnes said, so she ordered him to be stripped naked each night.</p><p>"There was never an intent to punish Pfc. Manning," she testified for the prosecution at a pretrial hearing.</p><p>Barnes said she didn't consider Manning's comment in early March 2011 serious enough to warrant placing him on suicide watch but "I felt that I needed not to take that comment lightly, and I didn't."</p><p>Barnes testified on the ninth day of a hearing to determine whether Manning's nine months in maximum custody at the base in Quantico, Va., amounted to illegal pretrial punishment. He was always on either suicide watch or injury-prevention status and Manning claims the conditions were so harsh that the charges, including aiding the enemy, should be dropped.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/jailer_bradley_manning_needed_to_tell_me_he_wanted_out_of_solitary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/jailer_bradley_manning_needed_to_tell_me_he_wanted_out_of_solitary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manning&#8217;s lawyer shares anger with supporters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mannings_lawyer_shares_anger_with_supporters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mannings_lawyer_shares_anger_with_supporters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Coombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Martial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Coombs gave a rare speech in a civilian setting, calling the military's treatment of his client "criminal"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Coombs, the lawyer representing Bradley Manning gave his first speech in a civilian setting Monday, sharing with supporters of the accused soldier his thoughts about the U.S. military and government's harsh treatment of his client. Coombs addressed Manning's supporters gathered in a Unitarian church in Washington and pulled no punches with his criticism.</p><p>"Brad’s treatment at Quantico will forever be etched into our nation’s history as a disgraceful moment in time,” he said. “Not only was it stupid and counter-productive, it was criminal. An entire group of individuals, who I have no doubt were honorable, chose to turn a blind eye to how he was being treated … They cared about something more: the media impact.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mannings_lawyer_shares_anger_with_supporters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mannings_lawyer_shares_anger_with_supporters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bradley Manning&#8217;s trial delayed in WikiLeaks case</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/bradley_mannings_trial_delayed_in_wikileaks_case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/bradley_mannings_trial_delayed_in_wikileaks_case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Meade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 24-year-old is charged with 22 offenses and could get life in prison]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FORT MEADE, Md. (AP) -- The trial of an Army private charged with sending U.S. secrets to the website WikiLeaks is being pushed back from February to March.</p><p>Military judge Col. Denise Lind announced the change Sunday at a pretrial hearing at Fort Meade for Pfc. Bradley Manning.</p><p>Manning's trial was set to begin Feb. 4. But Lind says pretrial proceedings will push the start date back to either March 6 or March 18.</p><p>The hearing is to determine whether the highly restrictive conditions Manning experienced for nine months were justified. The defense claims the restrictions were so punishing that the case should be dismissed.</p><p>Two psychiatrists have testified that the brig commander kept Manning tightly confined despite their recommendations to ease them.</p><p>The 24-year-old is charged with 22 offenses, including aiding the enemy. He could get life in prison.</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517534338'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/bradley_mannings_trial_delayed_in_wikileaks_case/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/bradley_mannings_trial_delayed_in_wikileaks_case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Julian Assange: The Web can create revolutions &#8212; or jail revolutionaries</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/julian_assange_the_web_can_create_revolutions_or_jail_revolutionaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/julian_assange_the_web_can_create_revolutions_or_jail_revolutionaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cypherpunks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WikiLeaks editor argues that the Internet makes revolution possible, but also massive government surveillance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Julian Assange:</em></strong> If we go back to this time in the early 1990s when you had the rise of the cypherpunk movement in response to state bans on cryptography, a lot of people were looking at the power of the Internet to provide free uncensored communications compared to mainstream media. But the cypherpunks always saw that, in fact, combined with this was also the power to surveil all the communications that were occurring. We now have increased communication versus increased surveillance. Increased communication means you have extra freedom relative to the people who are trying to control ideas and manufacture consent, and increased surveillance means just the opposite.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/julian_assange_the_web_can_create_revolutions_or_jail_revolutionaries/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/julian_assange_the_web_can_create_revolutions_or_jail_revolutionaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prosecutors exhibit Bradley Manning&#8217;s noose</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/prosecutors_exhibit_bradley_mannings_noose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/prosecutors_exhibit_bradley_mannings_noose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Meade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solitary Confinement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. government produces morbid evidence in attempt to justify detainment regime]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday, U.S. government prosecutors cross-examined Pfc. Bradley Manning at his pretrial hearing at Fort Meade. Manning testified Thursday and Friday as a part of a motion brought by his defense arguing that the detained soldier suffered “unlawful pretrial punishment.”</p><p>The prosecution produced grim props in an attempt to justify Manning's stringent detainment regime as a necessary means to keep the soldier from committing suicide. The chief prosecution lawyer, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/30/wikileaks-suspect-bradley-manning-noose-jail">according to</a> the Guardian's Ed Pilkington's courtroom reports, held up a knotted pink bedsheet -- a makeshift noose Manning reportedly fashioned in U.S. military custody in Kuwait, just days after his arrest. "The prosecutor also produced a second noose made from sandbag ties and two metal objects that he suggested Manning may have intended to use to harm himself, though the soldier said he did not recollect those items," reported Pilkington.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/prosecutors_exhibit_bradley_mannings_noose/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/prosecutors_exhibit_bradley_mannings_noose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bradley Manning testifies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/bradley_manning_testifies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/bradley_manning_testifies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Meade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Martial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solitary Confinement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The solider recounts harsh detainment; prosecution plans to use declassified material from bin Laden's computer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pfc. Bradley Manning testified Thursday on the third say of his pretrial hearing at Fort Meade. In his first public speaking appearance in two years, the soldier appeared in his dress uniform and "appeared nervous," according to an AP <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/29/wikileaks-hearing_n_2212331.html">report</a>. Meanwhile Kevin Gosztola, who has followed Bradley Manning's case more closely than perhaps any other reporter, <a href="https://twitter.com/kgosztola/status/274247968687804417">tweeted</a> that Manning was "smiling," "energetic" and "intelligent" while testifying about his detainment conditions.</p><p>Manning answered questions from his defense attorney as part of a pretrial motion arguing that the detained soldier suffered “unlawful pretrial punishment” and should thus have his charges dismissed for his time spent in what amounted to solitary confinement. According to reports, Manning described in detail his conditions while detained in Kuwait and then at Quantico when he returned to the U.S.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/bradley_manning_testifies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/bradley_manning_testifies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marine commander: Quantico wasn&#8217;t prepared for Manning&#8217;s long detention</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/marine_commander_quantico_wasnt_prepared_for_mannings_long_detention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/marine_commander_quantico_wasnt_prepared_for_mannings_long_detention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Meade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pretrial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solitary Confinement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The soldier was held at the military brig for nine months, when recommendations were for 90 days maximum]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retired Col. Daniel Choike, who served as the Quantico Marine brig commander while Pfc. Bradley Manning was imprisoned there for nine months, testified Tuesday in the soldier's pretrial hearing at Fort Meade.</p><p>"I didn't feel that Pfc. Manning should be detained more than 90 days in the brig," Choike told the hearing, recounting that he had conveyed the same view to his superior at the Pentagon when the accused whistle-blower arrived at the brig.</p><p>As Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola<a href="http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2012/11/28/former-quantico-brig-commander-testifies-at-bradley-mannings-unlawful-pretrial-punishment-hearing/"> reported</a> from Fort Meade:</p><blockquote><p>Choike gave over three hours of testimony from the witness stand. The most critical testimony probably came during Judge Army Col. Denise Lind’s line of questioning. She asked him about the Sanity Board that was to determine whether Manning was mentally fit to stand trial or not. It was having problems meeting and completing its work. Lind asked if he believed Quantico was adequately resourced to house someone of Manning’s stature.</p> <p>Other maximum custody (MAX) detainees, the inability to predict the number of incoming detainees, downsizing and the fact that the Brig did not have “dedicated medical support” all made it difficult. Choike answered “no.” The Brig was not a place for long-term confinement. It was adequate for 90 days.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/marine_commander_quantico_wasnt_prepared_for_mannings_long_detention/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/marine_commander_quantico_wasnt_prepared_for_mannings_long_detention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bradley Manning to testify at his pretrial hearing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/bradley_manning_to_testify_at_his_pretrial_hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/bradley_manning_to_testify_at_his_pretrial_hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistelblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For Meade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pretrial hearing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The soldier has not spoken publicly in two years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pfc. Bradley Manning will testify at his Fort Meade pretrial hearing Tuesday -- it will be the accused whistleblower's first public speaking appearance since 2010.</p><p>Manning is expected to speak about his treatment at the Marine Corps brig in Quantico as his attorney David Coombs aims to show that his detainment constituted illegal pretrial punishment, such that Manning's charges should be reduced or dismissed. Coombs has described his client's first months in the brig as "the functional equivalent of solitary confinement" — confined to a 6-by-8-foot cell, with no window or natural light, for more than 23 hours each day.</p><p>Via <a href="http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-11-25/news/bs-md-bradley-manning-confinement-20121123_1_david-coombs-prevention-of-injury-status-marine-corps-brig">the Baltimore Sun</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/bradley_manning_to_testify_at_his_pretrial_hearing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/bradley_manning_to_testify_at_his_pretrial_hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobel Peace Laureates condemn prosecution of Bradley Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/nobel_peace_laureates_condemn_prosecution_of_bradley_manning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/nobel_peace_laureates_condemn_prosecution_of_bradley_manning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desmond Tutu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Desmond Tutu, Mairead Maguire,  Adolfo Pérez Esquivel support the soldier, nominated for a Peace Prize himself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobel Peace laureates Archbishop Desmond Tutu (Nobel Peace Prize, 1984), Mairead Maguire (Nobel Peace Prize, 1977) and Adolfo Pérez Esquivel (Nobel Peace Prize, 1980) have <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/171272/nobel-laureates-salute-bradley-manning#">published a letter</a> in support of Pfc. Bradley Manning in The Nation, following news that the soldier <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/bradley_manning_will_take_responsibilty_for_wikileaks_leak/">is willing</a> to take responsibility for leaking information to WikiLeaks. The Peace Prize winners wrote against the government's treatment of the soldier, who has been in prison for over 900 days.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/nobel_peace_laureates_condemn_prosecution_of_bradley_manning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/nobel_peace_laureates_condemn_prosecution_of_bradley_manning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skype hands over information on teen Wikileaks fan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/skype_hands_over_information_on_teen_wikileaks_fan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/skype_hands_over_information_on_teen_wikileaks_fan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13070503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without even a warrant, a private Texas intelligence firm was given user information by the online calls site]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype, the Microsoft-owned online calls site, has shown scant regard for protecting user privacy. According to Russia Today, the company handed over sensitive account data pertaining to a teenage WikiLeaks fan from Holland to a Texas-based private cyber-intelligence firm, iSIGHT Partners.</p><p>A 16-year-old Dutch teenager's user information was released to iSight without even so much as a warrant. <a href="http://rt.com/usa/news/skype-warrant-dutch-isight-530/">RT reported</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The youngster was suspected of being involved in Operation Payback, an Anonymous-endorsed initiative that targeted the servers of PayPal, Visa, Mastercard and others after those companies blocked WikiLeaks from receiving online payment backs in December 2010. When hacktivists responded to the blockade by overflowing the servers of those sites with distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, PayPal asked Dallas, Texas’ iSIGHT Partners Inc., a self-described“global cyber intelligence firm,” to investigate.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/skype_hands_over_information_on_teen_wikileaks_fan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/skype_hands_over_information_on_teen_wikileaks_fan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bradley Manning will take responsibility for Wikileaks leak</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/bradley_manning_will_take_responsibilty_for_wikileaks_leak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/bradley_manning_will_take_responsibilty_for_wikileaks_leak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Meade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistelblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The detained soldier submitted a plea notice during his Fort Meade hearing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In exchange for the government pursuing lesser charges, the accused whistleblower has indicated that he will take responsibility for some alleged offenses, including providing information to Wikileaks. During his motion hearing Wednesday, Manning also told the court that he has chosen to have a trial by military judge, instead of a trial by jury, when his case is heard in February.</p><p>In a move known as “pleading by exceptions and substitutions,” Manning did not plead guilty Wednesday, rather his attorney put forward a plea notice indicating that the defendant will plead to some lesser included charges, but not the entirety of charges as they now stand. The motion hearing judge may choose to accept or reject the plea notice.</p><p>As Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola<a href="http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/"> reported </a>from Fort Meade, "Pleading to lesser-included offenses makes it possible to not plea to committing offenses under the Espionage Act or Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). Importantly, he can plead guilty without accepting the government’s charge that he 'aided the enemy' or 'exceeded authorized access' on his computer." If his plea notice is accepted, Manning could thus avoid facing life in prison (prosecutors have already stated that they are not seeking the death penalty -- even though an "aiding the enemy" charge can legally carry such a sentence.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/bradley_manning_will_take_responsibilty_for_wikileaks_leak/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/bradley_manning_will_take_responsibilty_for_wikileaks_leak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. to hand over emails about Bradley Manning&#8217;s detention</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/us_to_hand_over_emails_about_bradley_mannings_detention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/us_to_hand_over_emails_about_bradley_mannings_detention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Meade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solitary Confinement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13044673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defense lawyers will see hundreds of emails from officers who oversaw the soldier's Quantico detention]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The judge at Pfc. Bradley Manning's Fort Meade pretrial has ordered that prosecutors hand over hundreds of emails from officers overseeing the alleged whistleblower's detention at a military brig.</p><p>According to<a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/10/17/u-s-to-hand-over-emails-in-wikileaks-soldier-case/"> Raw Story</a>, "Judge Denise Lind said more than 600 emails withheld by prosecutors should be handed over to the defense, though she did not explain the reason behind her decision." Manning's attorneys requested the emails as evidence for their argument that their client was subjected to cruel and illegal treatment while detained at Quantico Marine base. Manning was held in a solitary cell, stripped naked and could wear only a suicide-proof smock to bed.</p><p>Raw Story reported that the officers' emails "discuss the military’s plans to respond to queries from reporters about Manning’s detention, preparing for protests, changes to Manning’s list of visitors and other details, according to the judge."</p><p>Glenn Greenwald took to Twitter<a href="https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/258718263721222144"> to note</a> that what comes from the email handover "should be very interesting."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/us_to_hand_over_emails_about_bradley_mannings_detention/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/us_to_hand_over_emails_about_bradley_mannings_detention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous &#8220;appalled&#8221; by WikiLeaks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/anonymous_appalled_by_wikileaks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/anonymous_appalled_by_wikileaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stratfor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13038272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the hacking collective, a pay wall was the final straw]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As members of global hacking collective Anonymous have made clear, they "do not forgive" and "do not forget." Bad news for WikiLeaks, which has angered its once-close hacking allies.</p><p>On Wednesday, WikiLeaks <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/wikileaks_to_begin_election_related_dump/singleton/">began to leak a batch of documents</a> relating to the presidential election. The organization invited supporters to browse the trove of emails provided to the secret-spilling site by Anonymous from its famed Statfor hack. In a move that Anonymous called a "betrayal," WikiLeaks put the documents behind a pay wall, which prompted readers for donations.</p><p>"This is a filthy and rotten, wholly unethical action - and Anonymous is enraged,"<a href="http://www.anonpaste.me/anonpaste/index.php?f12864c4aaa27e05#b85melA+HwnJhvVZbw93iqqnrdHJLNEJURQgWJSkAhk="> stated a release</a> from Anonymous Global. "We are aware that the donation pay wall can be circumvented by disabling Javascript. However, this is not the point. Neither is Anonymous concerned that WikiLeaks is asking for donations," the Anonymous release notes, explaining that most readers would not know how to avoid the pay wall.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/anonymous_appalled_by_wikileaks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/anonymous_appalled_by_wikileaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WikiLeaks to begin election-related dump</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/wikileaks_to_begin_election_related_dump/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/wikileaks_to_begin_election_related_dump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stratfor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The group plans to put out 200,000 Global Intelligence Files relating to both parties]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According<a href="http://wikileaks.org/WikiLeaks-GI-Files-Presidential.html"> to a release</a> Wednesday, WikiLeaks will begin publishing 200,000 files relating to the presidential election. The GI (Global Intelligence) files are emails obtained through a hack on private intelligence firm Stratfor, which were leaked to WikiLeaks by Anonymous. The release states:</p><blockquote><p>These GI Files releases will shed insight into key U.S. federal election players... Through this release WikiLeaks aims to inform the U.S. electorate in an unbiased way through the release of source documents from one of the most oddly influential companies in the U.S. today.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/wikileaks_to_begin_election_related_dump/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/wikileaks_to_begin_election_related_dump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gaga meets with Assange</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/gaga_meets_with_assange/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/gaga_meets_with_assange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfc. Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13034796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does dining and posing for photos with the Wikileaks founder undermine Lady Gaga as a feminist icon?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lady Gaga met with Julian Assange Monday night at his Ecuadorian Embassy hideout in London, and no one really knows why. The two shared a five-hour, closed-door dinner Monday and<a href="http://littlemonsters.com/image/507362d04f5cf1bc4e00037f"> posed for a grainy photo</a>. In so doing, they caused an Internet furor.</p><p>The Wikileaks founder may have also been joined by singer MIA if a <a href="https://twitter.com/MIAuniverse/status/254931697001435136">tweet exchange </a>between the singer and Gaga is to be believed. Gaga, the most followed person on Twitter, was in London near the embassy to launch her new fragrance, Fame.</p><p>This is not Gaga's first connection to Wikileaks. In fact, when Pfc. Bradley Manning passed classified documents to hacker Adrian Lamo, the CD carrying the leaked information was labeled "Lady Gaga." Manning told Lamo via now-infamous chat logs, "No one suspected a thing ... [I] listened and lip-synched to Lady Gaga's "Telephone" while exfiltrating possibly the largest data spillage in American history." [<a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2012/10/why-did-lady-gaga-visit-julian-assange-ecuadorian-embassy/57739/#">h/t Atlantic wire</a>]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/gaga_meets_with_assange/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/gaga_meets_with_assange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>