<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:51:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Bill O&#8217;Reilly America&#8217;s most popular historian?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/is_bill_oreilly_americas_most_popular_historian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/is_bill_oreilly_americas_most_popular_historian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Kennedy to Lincoln, Bill O'Reilly has been pumping out nonfiction bestsellers -- and has no plans to slow down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most Americans associate Bill O'Reilly with his perch on "The O'Reilly Factor," the most-watched show on cable television. But the conservative commentator is making a name for himself elsewhere, too: The New York Times bestseller list.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/24/books/bill-oreilly-has-top-2-spots-on-hardcover-best-seller-list.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=1&amp;">New York Times </a>notes that his recently published presidential biographies, "Killing Lincoln: The Shocking Assassination That Changed America Forever" and "Killing Kennedy: The End of Camelot," have been the top two books on the list for the past full week, with the latter having sold about one million copies.</p><p>In fact, the Times suggests that O'Reilly might be "the most popular history author in America" in part due to his television fame, and partially due to the sheer volume of work he has pumped out over the years:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/is_bill_oreilly_americas_most_popular_historian/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/is_bill_oreilly_americas_most_popular_historian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jerry Seinfeld explains how he writes comedy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/jerry_seinfeld_explains_how_he_writes_comedy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/jerry_seinfeld_explains_how_he_writes_comedy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Seinfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jokes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The comedian dissects his joke about Pop Tarts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analyzing comedy is a lot less funny than hearing it. But if you want to gain some insight into what goes into writing stand-up, legendary comic Jerry Seinfeld breaks it down for you in a video put out today by <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/23/magazine/jerry-seinfeld-intends-to-die-standing-up.html"> the New York Times</a> (and it's actually kind of funny, too).</p><p>Seinfeld talks about how he constructed a joke about Pop Tarts and, of course, his trademark "nothing." "In my world, the wronger something feels, the righter it is," he says. "So to waste so much time on something this stupid--that felt good to me."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/itWxXyCfW5s" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p>Here's the Pop Tart joke from a 2010 performance on David Letterman's "Late Show" (at 1:19)--which is still a work in progress:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/JpH-XjizJzk" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/jerry_seinfeld_explains_how_he_writes_comedy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/jerry_seinfeld_explains_how_he_writes_comedy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judd Apatow on &#8220;Girls&#8221; and &#8220;This Is 40&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/judd_apatow_on_girls_and_this_is_40/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/judd_apatow_on_girls_and_this_is_40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judd apatow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The producer discusses his struggles with writing, as well]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an exclusive interview with Indiewire, writer and producer Judd Apatow talks about writing and creativity, the second season of "Girls" and explains how his upcoming "This Is 40" tells a "slice-of-life" story in a "lifelike, unique way."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.indiewire.com/embed/player.jsp?videoId=5dccbec0-4483-11e2-a901-22000a1d0930&amp;w=480" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="400" height="280"></iframe></p><p>Apatow also spoke on NPR earlier <a href="http://www.npr.org/2012/12/08/166730538/fresh-air-weekend-judd-apatow-colm-toibin">this week</a> and has given advice <a href="http://rookiemag.com/2012/06/ask-a-grown-man-6/">As a Grown Man</a>, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/judd_apatow_on_girls_and_this_is_40/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/judd_apatow_on_girls_and_this_is_40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lena Dunham gets snippy with Gawker</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/lena_dunham_gets_snippy_with_gawker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/lena_dunham_gets_snippy_with_gawker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Girls" star is not pleased that the media outlet shared part of her $3.7 million book proposal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Friday, Gawker <a href="http://gawker.com/5966563/here-is-lena-dunhams-37-million-book-proposal">published</a> "Girls" creator Lena Dunham's proposal for her $3.7 million book deal. The book, "Not That Kind of Girl," is pitched as a funny lady-advice book about life and relationships. The assumption is that whatever Dunham might lack in experience she makes up for in wit.</p><p>But last week Gawker got ahold of the proposal, publishing it and annotating 12 choice lines (one of which mentions that her "vegan dinner party" was featured in the New York Times) with a dose of snark. Dunham's lawyer asked Gawker to take the proposal down (and it did). But now Deadline reports that Dunham wants the 12 lines to be taken down, too.</p><p>Deadline notes that "<a href="http://www.deadline.com/2012/12/lena-dunham-touchy-touchy-touchy-about-her-3-5m-book-proposal/">this is hardball</a>":</p><blockquote><p>This is hardball: Harder represented himself to Gawker’s attorney as “litigation  counsel for author and actress Lena Dunham [and] Lena Dunham has retained an attorney to demand that Gawker remove 12 quotes from her book propsal from our site,” an insider tells me.  (I hear Random House isn’t bitching to Gawker, only Dunham.)</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/lena_dunham_gets_snippy_with_gawker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/lena_dunham_gets_snippy_with_gawker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/must_see_morning_clip_75/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/must_see_morning_clip_75/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elie wiesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobel winner Elie Wiesel talks about death and what happens to the soul with Oprah]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eighty-four year old "Night" author Elie Wiesel tells Oprah Winfrey that when he won the Nobel Prize, he saw his deceased father in the hall. Though he wanted to join his father on "the other side," Wiesel explains that he had "more things to do," and hasn't "even begun."</p><p><iframe width="400" height="225" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/cgWJrLn2SGk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/must_see_morning_clip_75/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/must_see_morning_clip_75/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221; and &#8220;Modern Family&#8221; lead Writers Guild Award nominations</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/breaking_bad_and_modern_family_lead_writers_guild_award_nominations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/breaking_bad_and_modern_family_lead_writers_guild_award_nominations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Winners will be announced on Sunday, Feb. 17]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Writers Guild of America has announced nominations for the "outstanding achievement in television, news, radio, promotional writing, and graphic animation" for 2012. AMC's "Breaking Bad" received a drama series nomination, and four episodes of the show landed on the 6-show nomination list for Episodic Drama.</p><p>In comedy, "Modern Family" continued to reign with a series nomination and three episode noms.</p><p>Below are nominations for the top TV categories:</p><p><strong>DRAMA SERIES</strong></p><p>"Boardwalk Empire," HBO</p><p>"Breaking Bad," AMC</p><p>"Game of Thrones," HBO</p><p>"Homeland," Showtime</p><p>"Mad Men," AMC</p><p><strong>COMEDY SERIES </strong></p><p>"30 Rock," NBC</p><p>"Girls,"  HBO</p><p>"Louie," FX</p><p>"Modern Family," ABC</p><p>"Parks and Recreation," NBC<br /> <strong></strong></p><p><strong>NEW SERIES </strong></p><p>"Girls," HBO</p><p>"The Mindy Project," Fox</p><p>"Nashville," ABC</p><p>"The Newsroom," HBO</p><p>"Veep," HBO</p><p>Find the rest of the <a href="http://www.wga.org/content/default.aspx?id=5098">nominees here</a>. The WGA will announce the award winners on Sunday, Feb. 17.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/breaking_bad_and_modern_family_lead_writers_guild_award_nominations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/breaking_bad_and_modern_family_lead_writers_guild_award_nominations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bob Saget is writing a book with &#8220;dirty humor&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/bob_saget_is_writing_a_book_with_dirty_humor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/bob_saget_is_writing_a_book_with_dirty_humor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob saget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the aristocrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The comedian and "Full House" star's book is due out in 2014 ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most comedy fans know that Bob Saget has a <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4797499">really, really foul mouth</a>. The rest of America, however, still remembers Saget as the cuddly-wuddly dad on the ’90s sitcom “Full House,” or the wholesome host of “America’s Funniest Home Videos.” But Saget’s new book, due out in 2014 by It Books, an imprint of HarperCollins, aims to shed that image once and for all.</p><p>It Books executive editor Mark Chait, who helped negotiate the deal, said of Saget, "I've been dying to do a book with Bob ever since he almost made me p-ss my pants with laughter in 'The Aristocrats,'" a reference to the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0436078/">2005 documentary</a> in which Saget, along with 99 other comics, improvised perverse and absurd renditions of a classic Vaudeville joke. "It is now well-known that Bob Saget is <em>very </em>different from the neurotically conservative Danny Tanner character he played on 'Full House.' With this book he truly lets it all hang out -- the full monty of his crazy self, his dirty humor and unique personality," Chait said.</p><p>The AP notes that the book will have "filth and craziness and stories of such comedians as Richard Pryor and Don Rickles." And, if Saget's <a href="https://twitter.com/bobsaget/status/273317302517248000">tweets</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/bobsaget/status/265667257173151744">are any</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/bobsaget/status/271117286860025857">indication</a>, "<a href="https://twitter.com/bobsaget/status/273808479712595968">it may get dirty</a>."</p><p>h/t <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/bob-sagets-humor-book-due-395164">THR</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/bob_saget_is_writing_a_book_with_dirty_humor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/bob_saget_is_writing_a_book_with_dirty_humor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I was a screenwriting guru groupie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/i_was_a_screenwriting_guru_groupie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/i_was_a_screenwriting_guru_groupie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syd field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screenwriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunset Boulevard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a would-be scribe, I got hooked on how-to guides. Years later, I'm still waiting for my own triumphant third act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a></p><blockquote><p><em>Russell Pool for "House Beautiful" 1951</em></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><em>If, while watching the sun set on a used-car lot in Los Angeles, you are struck by the parallels between the image and the inevitable fate of humanity, do not, under any circumstance, write it down.</em></p> <p><em>— Fran Lebowitz</em></p></blockquote><p>LONG AGO, IN A TIME OF PEACE and relative innocence, I decided that I would like, very much, to be a writer. At that time, I was just a person who wrote stuff; a swell hobby and a fine way to pass the time while everyone else worked, but what I really wanted was to get paid to write stuff. Besides the obvious fiduciary benefits of such an arrangement, I was most interested in the title it confers. “Writer” would provide identity and security. “Person who writes stuff” provided only stomach pains.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/i_was_a_screenwriting_guru_groupie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/i_was_a_screenwriting_guru_groupie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Authors cannot review authors on Amazon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/authors_cannot_review_authors_on_amazon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/authors_cannot_review_authors_on_amazon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13061267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are an author on Amazon, prepare for your book reviews to be deleted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://dosomedamage.blogspot.com/2012/10/amazonreview.html">emails</a> that author Steve Weddle has received from Amazon, authors cannot leave reviews for other authors because they are deemed to be in direct competition with each other.</p><p>But leaving nice reviews for a friend, as Weddle did, hardly seems like something a rival would do. The LA Times <a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/books/jacketcopy/la-et-jc-why-is-amazon-deleting-writers-reviews-of-other-authors-books-20121102,0,7028228.story">reports</a> that the practice of writers penning nice reviews for fellow writers, as with blurbs on a book jacket, "can look a lot like back-scratching," but "it's not at all uncommon -- and it's never been discouraged" within the publishing industry.</p><p>When Weddle investigated the matter more deeply, Amazon sent him the following email:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/authors_cannot_review_authors_on_amazon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/authors_cannot_review_authors_on_amazon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Spider-Man&#8221; co-writer has book deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/spider_man_co_writer_has_book_deal_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/spider_man_co_writer_has_book_deal_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spider-Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadway play]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13050599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Berger is working on a book about the Broadway musical's stunt accidents and how it was made]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) -- The "Spider-Man" saga is going from the stage to the page.</p><p>Glen Berger, co-writer of the disaster-prone "Spider-Man, Turn Off the Dark," is working on a book. "Song of Spider-Man: The Inside Story of the Most Controversial Musical in Broadway History," will come out next year, Simon & Schuster announced Tuesday. Simon & Schuster publisher Jonathan Karp said the book would be, "entomologically speaking," the "ultimate fly-on-the-wall account" of how a musical is made.</p><p>The big budget production became notorious for a series of stunt accidents during previews. The show was eventually revamped and the original director, Julie Taymor, was fired. Taymor later sued the producers, who countersued. A tentative settlement was reached over the summer.</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517092488'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/spider_man_co_writer_has_book_deal_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/spider_man_co_writer_has_book_deal_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is Mo Yan?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/who_is_mo_yan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/who_is_mo_yan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swedish academy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nobel prize literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mo Yan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13037068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The life and literature of the 2012 Nobel laureate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before today, most Americans had never heard of Guan Moye, a 57-year-old Chinese national who writes under the pseudonym Mo Yan (which means "do not speak"). But according to <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1027589,00.html#ixzz290MpSjLF">Time</a> magazine, he is "one of the most famous, oft-banned and widely pirated of all Chinese writers." Today, Mo was awarded the 2012 Nobel Prize for literature for writing novels "with hallucinatory realism" that "merges folk tales, history and the contemporary." He became the first Chinese national to receive a Nobel Prize for literature:</p><p>John Updike's 2005 <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/05/09/050509crbo_books#ixzz290UkFy5F">description</a> of two Chinese writers, including Mo Yan, gives some (now prophetic) insight into why most of us have never head of Mo before:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/who_is_mo_yan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/who_is_mo_yan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of time and academia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/of_time_and_academia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/of_time_and_academia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'd like to have a lighter course load and just write more books -- but I've got tenure!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>I love your column. I love your political commentary even more. Your <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/since_you_didnt_ask/">last piece on Romney</a> was genius. Thanks for making my day.</strong></p><p><strong>OK. Here's the question. I'm an INTP. (The N is 26 to 1 Intuition over Sensation.) I'm a professional academic, and pretty successful at it. I have tenure. I've written two books. My introversion doesn't hinder my being a highly effective presenter at conferences. Even if I need to retreat to recharge with my dogs on a regular basis, an academic schedule makes that easy to handle. So what could be the problem, right?</strong></p><p><strong>I love to write. But I never have enough time. I've managed to get a novel out on Kindle and two books out with good university presses, but my super-heavy teaching load and service load do not permit me to achieve what I might otherwise achieve. I'd like to work at a research school with a lighter teaching load instead of a teaching school. But I'm not sure anyone would hire me at my age. Moreover, my considerably older husband works where I do and is very happy. He doesn't want to budge. I'm already 55. If I make a move it has to be now, and it may already be too late.</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/of_time_and_academia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/of_time_and_academia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calvin Trillin wins Thurber Prize for American Humor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/calvin_trillin_wins_thurber_prize_for_american_humor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/calvin_trillin_wins_thurber_prize_for_american_humor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calvin trillin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thurber prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Rakoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david sedaris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13029590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's about time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long-time New Yorker staff writer Calvin Trillin won the 2012 Thurber Prize for his book, "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Quite-Enough-Calvin-Trillin-Forty/dp/saloncom08-20">Quite Enough of Calvin Trillin: Forty Years of Funny Stuff</a><em>." </em>Trillin has the comic equivalent of perfect pitch," said judge and humor writer <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/life_and_entertainment/2012/10/02/wit-of-poet-reveals-versatility.html">Jennifer Crusie</a>. "He addresses everything from sausage to politics with clarity, elegance and a fine dry wit, never missing a note."</p><p>Trillin talked about his approach to humor in an interview with <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/media/2011/09/not-quite-enough-calvin-trillin">Mother Jones</a> last year:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/calvin_trillin_wins_thurber_prize_for_american_humor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/calvin_trillin_wins_thurber_prize_for_american_humor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can I write and work too?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/can_i_write_and_work_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/can_i_write_and_work_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They want me to manage this restaurant but I don't see how I can and also be a writer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>I'm 25, living in a city I love, working a job I love, and writing. Writing has been my dream more than my passion for most of my life, but I'm good at it and I've finally gotten the discipline to put my butt in the chair every day and bang out a few words. Unfortunately, I'm good at my job, too.</strong></p><p><strong>I work in food service in a demi-managerial position (at a recently opened mom-and-pop joint where job titles are a bit of a joke) and am the most reliable and competent person who works there, aside from the owners. It's not hard. I work a schedule I like, I do work I like, I'm not as young as my co-workers and I take what I do seriously. But the owners would love me to do more. What exactly "more" is remains undefined. They've given me multiple raises in the six months since the cafe has opened -- small ones, but a raise is a raise. It's nice to be working somewhere I'm appreciated, making (slightly) more than minimum wage, doing something I love. But.</strong></p><p><strong>Writing is what I love, it's what keeps me going. I can't write and manage this cafe. I don't know how to broach this with the owners, who are clearly set on grooming me to take on some of the day-to-day managerial duties from them. Help!</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/can_i_write_and_work_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/can_i_write_and_work_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Art doesn&#8217;t pay</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/its_never_been_worse_to_be_an_artist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/its_never_been_worse_to_be_an_artist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weeklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Frey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13025145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The creative class, of which I am a proud and bewildered member, appears to be going bankrupt. Is all hope lost?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking out at the mountains, thinking: Trees are so lucky, they don’t have to have jobs. Of course, as any elementary schoolteacher will tell you, trees <em>do</em> have an important job, which is to expel nice fresh oxygen into the air so we can all breathe, to provide a habitat for lots of necessary creatures, and so on. But they don’t have to have <em>job</em> jobs, where you show up at an office every day, or compulsively check your work email from home, or wait nervously for checks to arrive in the mail in hopes that your propane gas won’t get turned off. Trees don’t have to worry about things like that, and I envy them.</p><p><a href="http://www.theweeklings.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/TheWeeklings-1.jpg" alt="The Weeklings" align="left" /></a>“Old. Tired. Sick. Alone. Broke.” This sad litany comes from an idiosyncratic novel by David Markson called <em>The Last Novel,</em> in which he tells the story, in fragmentary anecdotes, of an aging author writing his final book. The novel references hundreds of other writers and artists of various kinds, many of whom went unrecognized during their lives.  Old. Tired. Sick. Alone. Broke. I can’t stand the thought of anyone ending up that way.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/its_never_been_worse_to_be_an_artist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/its_never_been_worse_to_be_an_artist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Naomi Wolf says her critics have problems with female sexuality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/naomi_wolf_misses_the_point_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/naomi_wolf_misses_the_point_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vagina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13021478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author of "Vagina: A New Biography" defends herself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://ideas.time.com/2012/09/25/is-female-sexual-pleasure-devalued/?iid=op-main-lede">Time article</a>, author Naomi Wolf shot back at critics who attacked her <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/critics_attack_naomi_wolf/">psuedo-scientific</a>, airy-fairy <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Vagina-New-Biography-Naomi-Wolf/dp/0061989169/saloncom08-20">"Vagina: A New Biography,"</a> for being too pseudo-scientific and airy-fairy. But much of Wolf's self-justifying rebuttal amounts to her complaining that critics don't like her book because people are afraid to talk about women and sex.</p><p>See here:</p><blockquote><p>While many responses to my book were positive, the tone of some of the critiques—from <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/culture/culture/2012/09/goddess-shaped-hole-naomi-wolfs-new-work">“mystic woo woo about the frou frou</a>"  to “<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/13/opinion/la-oe-daum-naomi-wolf-vagina-20120913">bad news for everyone who has one</a>” — suggests to me that our culture, even one in which <em>Fifty Shades of Grey</em> is being devoured by millions of women, still has problems discussing women’s sexuality in a positive, empowering way. And we need — perhaps women especially — to be able to have that conversation.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/naomi_wolf_misses_the_point_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/naomi_wolf_misses_the_point_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I quit my writing job!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/i_quit_my_writing_job/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/i_quit_my_writing_job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13020807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was passed over for editor so I walked. Now at 57, I'm scared and have no income]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>I recently quit my job as a staff writer for a weekly newspaper. I had applied for the editor’s position, since our current editor was leaving for (much) more lucrative work outside the confines of journalism. I felt qualified for the job and had established an excellent working relationship in the community with many people. I had worked as a staff writer for almost two years at the time and felt confident that I was prepared to take on the editor’s position.</strong></p><p><strong>My reason for leaving my position was the fact that the publisher, who was rarely in our office, basically ignored my application for almost a month, then put me into the editor’s position as "fill-in" (his words) and offered me no pay raise, no title and no support. Rather, he denigrated me at every turn. I received approximately 20 minutes of training for the editor’s position. Even though I had worked in the publishing field for almost 15 years, my publisher told me that the "fill-in" position would afford me "valuable experience" -- apparently the 11 years I had been employed in various departments by this company hadn’t given me enough "experience" to get a promotion or a raise (by the way, my rate of pay was, from start to finish, $7.50 per hour).</strong><strong></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/i_quit_my_writing_job/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/i_quit_my_writing_job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ill Doctrine on writer&#8217;s block</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/ill_doctrine_on_writers_block/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/ill_doctrine_on_writers_block/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ill Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Smooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writer's Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brother Ali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13013953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview with Jay Smooth, the rapper Brother Ali reflects on the "little hater" inside all of us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/49456269" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.animalnewyork.com/2012/ill-doctrine-brother-ali-meets-the-little-hater/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=ill-doctrine-brother-ali-meets-the-little-hater">Ill Doctrine: Brother Ali Meets the Little Hater</a> from <a href="http://www.animalnewyork.com/">ANIMALNewYork.com</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com/">Vimeo</a>.</p><p>Hip-Hop culture doesn't leave a lot of room for self-doubt, which is part of what makes Brother Ali so unique.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/ill_doctrine_on_writers_block/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/ill_doctrine_on_writers_block/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critics attack Naomi Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/critics_attack_naomi_wolf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/critics_attack_naomi_wolf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katie Roiphe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13009158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The writer's latest book, "Vagina: A New Biography," has received memorably bad reviews]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's only been one day since Naomi Wolf's "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Vagina-New-Biography-Naomi-Wolf/dp/0061989169/saloncom08-20">Vagina: A New Biography</a>" came out, and already <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/sep/27/pride-and-prejudice/?pagination=false">critics</a> <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2012/09/10/120910crbo_books_levy">are</a> <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/09/09/naomi-wolf-s-vagina-issues.html">jumping</a> on it. At Slate Katie Roiphe (who has her own <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/katie_roiphe_still_doesnt_understand_sexual_harassment/">detractors</a>) describes the book as <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/roiphe/2012/09/naomi_wolf_s_new_book_about_her_vagina_is_ludicrous_.html">self-parody</a>, writing, "I doubt the most brilliant novelist in the world could have created a more skewering satire of Naomi Wolf’s career."<em> </em>And when asked what she wants readers to take away from her book, Wolf told <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/authors/interviews/article/53078-reclaiming-the-vagina-pw-talks-with-naomi-wolf.html">Publisher's Weekly</a>, "That the vagina is misunderstood if we see it as a sex organ, reductively. That it’s much better understood as part of the female brain, an extension of the female consciousness, connected to women’s creativity, confidence, and sense of connection to the world." That doesn't sound much better.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/critics_attack_naomi_wolf/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/critics_attack_naomi_wolf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>