<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Yemen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/yemen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ letter to the AP defends phone call subpoenas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/doj_letter_to_the_ap_defends_phone_call_subpoenas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/doj_letter_to_the_ap_defends_phone_call_subpoenas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The subpoenas were part of "the protection of national security and effective enforcement of our criminal laws"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/141480819/DOJ-Letter-to-AP">letter</a> to the Associated Press president and CEO Gary Pruitt, the Justice Department's Deputy Attorney General James Cole defended his decision to subpoena phone records from the news agency over leaks of information about a CIA operation in Yemen, saying that the DOJ was trying to protect national security and enforce criminal laws.</p><p>"Even given the significant public interest in enforcing criminal laws that protect our national security, seeking toll records associated with media organizations is undertaken only after all other reasonable alternative investigative steps have been taken," Cole wrote.</p><p>After a "comprehensive investigation" by the Justice Department, the letter continues, the DOJ decided to subpoena the records. "The subpoenas were limited to a reasonable period of time and did not seek the content of any calls," Cole continued. "In addition, these records have been closely held and reviewed solely for the purposes of this ongoing criminal investigation. The records have not been and will not be provided for use in any other investigations."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/doj_letter_to_the_ap_defends_phone_call_subpoenas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/doj_letter_to_the_ap_defends_phone_call_subpoenas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How drones deceive us</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/how_drones_deceive_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/how_drones_deceive_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeted killings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The advantage of technologized warfare is also its most worrying: The perception of decreased risk to the aggressor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the brave new world of technologized warfare, every week seems to bring a new sci-fi-movie-worthy revelation about America's ongoing drone operations. This past week was no exception. From the <a href="http://m.guardiannews.com/world/2013/may/02/us-drone-strikes-guantanamo">lawyer</a> who first outlined White House policy on drone attacks, we learned that the government is likely using such attacks instead of capturing alleged terrorists, all to avoid the thorny legal issues that come with prisoner detainment. From the <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-point-of-no-return-should-robots-be-able-to-decide-to-kill-you-on-their-own-20130430">United Nations</a>, we learned that the world may be closer to seeing its first self-directed Terminator-style killing machines -- technically called "Lethal Autonomous Robots" -- than many may have previously thought.</p><p>These kind of stories will continue for one big, if unstated, reason: robotic warfare seems to hold the promise of making many things easier, cheaper and less risky, at least for the countries that operate the drones. But the operative word is "seems," for drones involve a problematic illusion that distorts our perception of the risks we face.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/how_drones_deceive_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/how_drones_deceive_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yemeni activist: U.S. strikes &#8220;kerosene for insurgency&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/yemeni_activist_u_s_strikes_kerosene_for_insurgency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/yemeni_activist_u_s_strikes_kerosene_for_insurgency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional progressive caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drone hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeted killing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Capitol Hill hearing on lethal drone killings, testimonies urge American accountability, legal precision]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delivering video testimony from Yemen to a congressional hearing Wednesday, Yemeni youth and human rights activist Baraa Shiban made clear what's at stake with the U.S.'s ongoing shadow drone war. Speaking of Yemenis who had witnessed, either directly or through video footage, the carnage wrought by a recent strike that killed at least 12 civilians, Shiban said, "What does the U.S. mean to these people now? A blasted car, and gruesome footage of dead families?"</p><p>Wednesday's ad hoc drone hearing, called by the Congressional Progressive Caucus, is a dim flicker of light shed against dense shadows surrounding the Obama administration's lethal drone strike program. While lawmakers including Senate Intelligence Committee chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., have made <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/fact_checking_feinstein_on_civilian_drones_deaths/">dubious claims</a> about the precision of drone strikes and limited civilian casualties, and while CIA Director John Brennan <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/brennan_faces_the_senate_intelligence_committee/">has vowed</a> that reports of civilian death are seriously investigated, rarely is testimony from those who've seen the first hand plight of drone struck regions heard on Capitol Hill. Written and video testimony was released to Salon in advance of the hearing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/yemeni_activist_u_s_strikes_kerosene_for_insurgency/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/yemeni_activist_u_s_strikes_kerosene_for_insurgency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drone victim: U.S. strikes boost al-Qaida recruitment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/drone_victim_u_s_strikes_boost_al_qaeda_recruitment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/drone_victim_u_s_strikes_boost_al_qaeda_recruitment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone Attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeted killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A young Yemeni whose village was targeted by a U.S. drone strike tells Salon about the experience, and its effects]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 17, a 23-year-old Yemeni activist and journalist named Farea Al-Muslimi <a href="http://stream.aljazeera.com/story/201304182118-0022687">tweeted</a> about a U.S. drone strike on his village, Wessab, which he describes as “<a href="http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/04/yemen-village-drone-attack-wessab.html">the Yemen capital of misery with its beautiful mountains no one from outside remembers</a>.” In the strike, five alleged members of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) were killed. The U.S. droned Yemen <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/04/living-in-terror-under-a-drone-filled-sky-in-yemen/275373/">53 times last year,</a> tripling the number of attacks from 2011, and incurring a civilian casualty rate between 4 to 8.5 percent. On April 23, Al-Muslimi gave stirring testimony at the <a href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=b01a319ecae60e7cbb832de271030205.">first U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee</a> on the legality of drone wars.</p><p>In the exclusive conversation below, Al-Muslimi tells Salon about the drone strikes’ devastating toll on Yemeni civilians and how the current U.S. counterterrorism policy in Yemen is like “reading from a manual '10 Steps on How to Lose a War.'”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/drone_victim_u_s_strikes_boost_al_qaeda_recruitment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/drone_victim_u_s_strikes_boost_al_qaeda_recruitment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 investigative videos: Stoned on the job</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/top_5_investigative_videos_stoned_on_the_job_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/top_5_investigative_videos_stoned_on_the_job_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 5 investigative videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The I Files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot Brownies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kids on Death Row]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From pot brownies to nerve-calming heads of lettuce, a look at the finest docs YouTube has to offer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/theifilestv"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/I-Files-logo_for-light-bkgd-e1362186166136.png" alt="The I Files" /></a> Notes to self after watching this week’s videos: Never get sent to death row in Yemen, try eating lettuce during a Syrian firefight to calm the nerves, and always nibble sparingly at the brownie when covering a medical marijuana event.</p><p>For a first look at the best news and documentaries available online, please take a moment to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdmqkUIfXt2cMBOLQsijMFg?sub_confirmation=1">subscribe to The I Files</a>, a highly digestible one-stop news source. Think of The I Files as a pot brownie you find at a party, a delectable treat that takes you on a magical mystery tour of the world’s news.</p><p>“High on the Job,” Center for Investigative Reporting</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9N9pe-8hvPs" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p>Ever had one of those days at work when one little mistake sends things spiraling out of control? This happened to Michael Montgomery, a reporter for KQED (the public TV station in San Francisco) and the Center for Investigative Reporting, when he inadvertently got a little too close to the story he was covering.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/top_5_investigative_videos_stoned_on_the_job_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/top_5_investigative_videos_stoned_on_the_job_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate drone hearing challenges &#8220;targeted kill&#8221; claims</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/senate_drone_hearing_challenges_targeted_kill_claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/senate_drone_hearing_challenges_targeted_kill_claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate subcomittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeted killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Durbin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Witness testimony undermines administration claims that only al-Qaida leaders are drone targets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tuesday afternoon on Capitol Hill saw the Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights, chaired by Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin, host a hearing on drone warfare. Just last week a formidable group of human rights advocates and legal experts including the ACLU, Amnesty International, clinics from NYU School of Law and Columbia Law School among others, wrote to the president to challenge the "accountability and transparency" of the drone program, as well as the government's contention that drone strikes are carefully targeted.</p><p>Whether the Senate hearing will yield answers to crucial questions about Obama's drone wars is unclear. Witnesses scheduled to testify include retired Gen. James Cartwright of United States Marine Corp; activist and journalist Farea Al-Muslimi of Sana’a, Yemen; Peter Bergen, director of the National Security Studies Program at the New America Foundation; and a number of legal experts. Although the Senate committee tried to have a witness appear from the Justice Department, this request was denied.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/senate_drone_hearing_challenges_targeted_kill_claims/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/senate_drone_hearing_challenges_targeted_kill_claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration lied about drone targets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obama_administration_lied_about_drone_targets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obama_administration_lied_about_drone_targets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcclatchy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McClatchy obtained documents showing strikes targeted "others," not just high level al-Qaida operatives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Investigative reports and on-the-ground testimonies have made it public knowledge that far more people than al-Qaida leaders are killed by drone strikes. The U.K.'s Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ) estimates that in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia over 1,o00 civilians may have been killed by U.S. drone strikes. The Obama administration has long maintained, however, that strikes are only ever authorized to target "specific senior operational leaders of al-Qaida and associated forces." Documents obtained by McClatchy newspapers suggest that these claims are false.</p><p>The top-secret intelligence reports reveal, as one expert with the Council on Foreign Relations told McClatchy, that the administration is “misleading the public about the scope of who can legitimately be targeted.” It is not clear who leaked the documents to McClatchy for review.</p><p><a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/04/09/188062/obamas-drone-war-kills-others.html">Via McClatchy:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obama_administration_lied_about_drone_targets/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obama_administration_lied_about_drone_targets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saudi, Yemen under fire for child executions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/saudi_yemen_under_fire_for_child_executions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/saudi_yemen_under_fire_for_child_executions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty international]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13218309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Human rights groups condemn the death penalty for juvenile offenders, only abolished in the U.S. in 2005]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two of the United States' closest allies in the Middle East -- Yemen and Saudi Arabia -- have come under fire Monday from international human rights groups over the execution of juveniles offenders.</p><p>According to Amnesty International, Saudi Arabia is scheduled to execute seven men on Tuesday for crimes committed when they were under 18-years-old. The men, sentenced to death in 2009 for armed robbery, have been "beaten, denied food and water, deprived of sleep, forced to remain standing for 24 hours and then forced to sign 'confessions'," according to Amnesty.</p><p>As Reuters<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/saudi-arabia-behead-seven-tuesday-rights-group-160330196.html"> noted</a>, the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights said in a 2006 report that it was "deeply alarmed" at the imposition of capital punishment by Saudi judges for crimes committed before the age of 18.</p><p>Meanwhile, Human Rights Watch has decried the executions in recent years in Yemen of 15 male and female offenders aged under 18 when they committed their offenses. "The New-York-based group also called on the president, Abd Rabbu Mansour Hadi, to reverse the execution orders of three juveniles on death row, whose appeals have been exhausted," the Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/04/yemen-stop-child-executions-human-rights">reported.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/saudi_yemen_under_fire_for_child_executions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/saudi_yemen_under_fire_for_child_executions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What about foreign nationals killed by drones?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/what_about_the_non_u_s_citizens_killed_by_drones_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/what_about_the_non_u_s_citizens_killed_by_drones_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians and the media ignore the overwhelming majority of those targeted and killed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nomination of John Brennan to be CIA director has prompted <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/07/brennan-pressed-drones-confirmation/">intense debate</a> on Capitol Hill and in the media about U.S. drone killings abroad. But the focus has been on the targeting of American citizens – a narrow issue that accounts for a miniscule proportion of the hundreds of drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen in recent years.</p><p>Consider: while <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2013/feb/08/nation/la-na-targeted-killing-20130209">four</a> American citizens are known to have been killed by drones in the past decade, the strikes have killed an<a href="http://counterterrorism.newamerica.net/drones">estimated</a> <a href="http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/category/projects/drones/">total</a> of 2,600 to 4,700 people over the same period.</p><div id="google-callout">The focus on American citizens overshadows a far more common, and less understood, type of strike: those that do not target American citizens, Al Qaeda leaders, or, in fact, any other specific individual.</div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/what_about_the_non_u_s_citizens_killed_by_drones_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/what_about_the_non_u_s_citizens_killed_by_drones_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drones are on the &#8220;wrong side of history&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/drones_are_on_the_wrong_side_of_history_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/drones_are_on_the_wrong_side_of_history_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13198886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deadly attacks subvert the rule of law -- and could come back to haunt U.S. foreign policy for decades to come]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the New York Times published a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/06/world/middleeast/with-brennan-pick-a-light-on-drone-strikes-hazards.html">chilling account</a> of how indiscriminate killing in war remains bad policy even today. This time, it’s done not by young GIs in the field but by anonymous puppeteers guiding drones that hover and attack by remote control against targets thousands of miles away, often killing the innocent and driving their enraged and grieving families and friends straight into the arms of the very terrorists we’re trying to eradicate.</p><p>The Times told of a Muslim cleric in Yemen named Salem Ahmed bin Ali Jaber, standing in a village mosque denouncing al-Qaida. It was a brave thing to do — a respected tribal figure, arguing against terrorism. But two days later, when he and a police officer cousin agreed to meet with three al-Qaida members to continue the argument, all five men — friend and foe — were incinerated by an American drone attack. The killings infuriated the village and prompted rumors of an upwelling of support in the town for al-Qaida, because, the Times reported, “such a move is seen as the only way to retaliate against the United States.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/drones_are_on_the_wrong_side_of_history_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/drones_are_on_the_wrong_side_of_history_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact-checking Feinstein on civilian drone deaths</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/fact_checking_feinstein_on_civilian_drones_deaths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/fact_checking_feinstein_on_civilian_drones_deaths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civilian deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13195016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At John Brennan's confirmation hearing, the senator understated civilian casualties from drones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opening the Senate <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/brennan_faces_the_senate_intelligence_committee/">confirmation hearing</a> for CIA director nominee John Brennan, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) offered a mini panegyric to drone strikes. She lamented the secrecy surrounding the CIA's drone program as she wanted to be able to speak more openly about its successes and the minimal collateral damage of drone wars. She stated that civilian casualties caused by U.S. drone strikes each year has "typically been in the single digits."</p><p>Later in the hearing, Brennan rejected claims that drone strikes were provoking a backlash of anti-American sentiment. He said citizens are instead grateful to be rescued from the grip of al-Qaida. But commentators have been swift to challenge Feinstein's claims based on contradicting open-source reports and studies. As both the Washington Post and the Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/07/drones-obama-single-digit-civilian-deaths">note</a>, civilian death numbers are difficult to tabulate with certainty (indeed, the very question of how the administration categorizes "civilian" or "enemy combatant" is in itself contentious). Suffice to say that Feinstein's "single digits" comments stands at odds with others' findings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/fact_checking_feinstein_on_civilian_drones_deaths/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/fact_checking_feinstein_on_civilian_drones_deaths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12 rational responses to irrational gun arguments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/12_rational_responses_to_irrational_gun_arguments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/12_rational_responses_to_irrational_gun_arguments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13181816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the gun control debate hitting a fever pitch, a handy how-to guide for dealing with gun rights extremists]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> In a recent discussion about gun control on Thom Hartmann's program, my opponent suggested that gun control advocates like me really have a cultural aversion to guns. That's a standard ploy for the gun set: when reason isn’t on your side, deploy emotional and personal arguments instead.</p><p>"Anti-gun"? I could've brought up my own recreational gun use, or even brought out the firing range pass I carry in my wallet. But I'll admit that I've lost a little of my taste for it as our national killing spree continues unabated. What's more, that would've been disrespectful to the millions of Americans who do have an understandable aversion to guns. Personal habits should have no part in a rational policy discussion.</p><p>Now that President Obama has made his initial gun control proposals, the crazy's being ratcheted up to a new level. Rational Americans in all walks of life will be confronted with these kinds of arguments. We're going to need a playbook. Here are 12 responses you can use when you're confronted with some of the standard illogical, irrational and emotionally overheated statements that gun extremists use.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/12_rational_responses_to_irrational_gun_arguments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/12_rational_responses_to_irrational_gun_arguments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>199</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN launches investigation into drone strikes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/un_launches_investigation_into_drone_strikes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/un_launches_investigation_into_drone_strikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben emmerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geneva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kill Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Geneva-based team will examine reports of civilian deaths and the legality of the U.S.'s extrajudicial killings]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.N. announced Thursday the launch of its investigation into targeted killings carried out by the U.S. and its allies. U.N. special rapporteur Ben Emmerson, who monitors counter-terrorism programs, will lead the Geneva-based investigation, which will look at civilian deaths in drone strikes and the legality of extradjudicial executions.</p><p>As Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/un_team_to_investigate_civilian_drone_deaths/">reported</a> last year when Emmerson first announced the U.N. project, the human rights attorney told a Harvard conference that his team would be weighing up evidence as to whether the Obama administration was guilty of war crimes. He said:</p><blockquote><p>[It is] alleged that since President Obama took office at least 50 civilians were killed in follow-up strikes when they had gone to help victims and more than 20 civilians have also been attacked in deliberate strikes on funerals and mourners. [U.N. consultant, professor of human rights] Christof Heyns … has described such attacks, if they prove to have happened, as war crimes. I would endorse that view.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/un_launches_investigation_into_drone_strikes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/un_launches_investigation_into_drone_strikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yemen&#8217;s human rights minister criticizes U.S. drone strikes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/yemens_human_rights_minister_criticizes_us_drone_strikes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/yemens_human_rights_minister_criticizes_us_drone_strikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadow War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone strikes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following amped up attacks in recent weeks, the cabinet minister expressed concern about civilian deaths]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last August, counterterrorism adviser and nominee for CIA chief John Brennan <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/cef6aa7e-e1a1-11e1-9c72-00144feab49a.html#axzz2IoYpsB8O">publicly denied</a> that U.S. drone strikes in Yemen were provoking anti-American sentiment. The attacks, Brennan said, had aided the Yemeni government in freeing its citizens from the "hellish grip" of al-Qaida in the country's south.</p><p>But on Tuesday Yemen's human rights minister criticized drone strikes as a counterterror tactic. "I am in favor of changing the anti-terrorism strategy. I think there are more effective strategies," said cabinet minister and former anti-Saleh activist Hooria Mashhour. "We're committed to fighting terrorism but we're calling for changing the means and strategies ... These means and strategies can be applied on the ground without harming civilians and without leading to human rights violations," she<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/22/us-yemen-qaeda-idUSBRE90L0VJ20130122"> told Reuters</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/yemens_human_rights_minister_criticizes_us_drone_strikes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/yemens_human_rights_minister_criticizes_us_drone_strikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama misleads over end to war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/obama_misleads_about_an_end_to_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/obama_misleads_about_an_end_to_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadow War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13177823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his inaugural address, the president hailed end to decade of war, while apparatus for perpetual war is cemented]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his inauguration address Monday, President Obama proclaimed that a “decade of war is now ending.” Mere hours earlier, a U.S. drone <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/yemen-us-drone-strike-kills-al-qaida-militants-18269140">dropped missiles</a> over Yemen, killing two al-Qaida militants as part of an intensified airstrike campaign which began last month.</p><p>It has been well-established in reports (like those from the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-drone-strikes-will-get-pass-in-counterterrorism-playbook-officials-say/2013/01/19/ca169a20-618d-11e2-9940-6fc488f3fecd_story.html">Washington Post</a>'s Greg Miller) that the Obama administration has set up a national security apparatus ensuring, contra the president's words Monday, a perpetual war. Obama's speech may have been referring to the withdrawal of troops form Iraq or the winding down of U.S. military leadership in Afghanistan, but an increasingly militarized CIA and the perpetuation of shadow wars in Yemen and Somalia, to name just two, let alone the U.S. funds and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/15/americas-arms-sales-bahrain-crackdown">arms sent around the world </a>to bolster or undermine regimes as U.S. interests dictate, make talk of ending war a semantic gamble at best.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/obama_misleads_about_an_end_to_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/obama_misleads_about_an_end_to_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With drones, no Christmas ceasefire</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/with_drones_no_christmas_ceasefire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/with_drones_no_christmas_ceasefire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two U.S. drone strikes were carried out in Yemen on Christmas Eve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. carried out two drone strikes in Yemen over the Christmas holiday. On Christmas Eve, a vehicle carrying two suspected al-Qaida militants was hit by a U.S. missiles and later than night five "unidentified" individuals were killed in another U.S. strike from an unmanned aerial vehicle.</p><p>As Kevin Gosztola <a href="http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2012/12/26/us-drone-strikes-cyber-attacks-carried-out-under-cover-of-the-christmas-holiday/">pointed out</a>, the attacks highlight how drone technology have put an end to traditional American ceasefires over Christmas:</p><blockquote><p>There was no ceasefire from the Obama administration during the holiday. In fact, it appears they waited until Christmas Eve on purpose to conduct a couple strikes as there had not been action in the covert drone war in Yemen for well over a month.</p> <p>In earlier wars, there may have been some kind of a truce because most of the soldiers and their families would be celebrating Christmas, however, characteristic of drone warfare, the drone pilots who carried out the order to fire upon suspected militants were nowhere near the area of the strike. They were completely detached and, depending on where they were when they directed the flying killer robot to attack, they were likely able to go home and see their family on Christmas Eve.</p></blockquote><p>As<a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/12/24/yemen-militants-drone-idINDEE8BN06Q20121224"> Reuters</a> noted, the Christmas strikes "were the first in almost two months by pilotless aircraft against suspected al-Qaida men in Yemen" where the U.S. has escalated its shadow war over the past year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/with_drones_no_christmas_ceasefire/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/with_drones_no_christmas_ceasefire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun violence, by the numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/gun_violence_by_the_numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/gun_violence_by_the_numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weeklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These stats tell you everything you need to know about our nationwide epidemic -- and my personal trauma]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theweeklings.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/11/weeklings_new_small.png" alt="The Weeklings" align="left" /></a> <strong></strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>10 Minutes</strong> – Length of time Adam Lanza was shooting</p><p><strong>90</strong> (more than) – Number of bullets shot</p><p><strong>38</strong> – Number of mass shootings in 2012</p><p><strong>$50,000</strong> – Average cost of medical treatment per homicide shooting victim</p><p><strong>$2.3 Billion</strong> – Total lifetime medical costs for gunshot injuries (as of 1999)</p><p><strong>$6 Million</strong> – Those medical costs per day</p><p><strong>49 Percent</strong> – Amount of those lifetime medical costs paid by taxpayers</p><p><strong>20 Percent</strong> – Number of gun owners with 65 percent of the firearms in the U.S.</p><p><strong>36,000</strong> – Number of guns thrown away each year</p><p><strong>16,808,538</strong> – Number of applications to purchase guns in the U.S. from January – November 2012 from legal dealers (does not include gun shows or private sales)</p><p><strong>5X</strong> –<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/dec/17/how-many-guns-us"> Amount this could arm every NATO member state’s armed forces</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/gun_violence_by_the_numbers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/gun_violence_by_the_numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. buys Yemen a fleet of spy planes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/u_s_buys_yemen_a_fleet_of_spy_planes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/u_s_buys_yemen_a_fleet_of_spy_planes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disposition Matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadow War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Manned aircraft will join unmanned drones in the U.S. shadow war]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. drones will soon be joined in Yemeni skies by spy planes operated by Yemen's forces. <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/11/yemen-spy-planes/">Wired's Spencer Ackerman</a> reported that "the Pentagon wants to buy its Yemeni ally small, piloted spy planes."</p><p>According to Ackerman, "It’s a sign that the U.S. is upgrading the hardware it gives the Yemeni military, and digging in for a long shadow war." The few dozen Light Observation Aircraft will be flown by Yemenis trained by U.S. forces. "The planes have to be configured so the U.S. can teach Yemenis how to be their own eyes in the sky, and they need to be in Yemen in under 24 months," reported Ackerman, noting that the aircraft will be used in Yemen alongside, not instead of, remotely operated U.S. drones to fly over areas where al-Qaida is believed to be operating.</p><p>Ackerman added:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/u_s_buys_yemen_a_fleet_of_spy_planes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/u_s_buys_yemen_a_fleet_of_spy_planes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIA wants more drones</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/cia_wants_more_drones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/cia_wants_more_drones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unmanned Aerial Vehicles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13045614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The spy agency continues expanding into a paramilitary force]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CIA has asked the White House for a significant expansion in its fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles. If approved, the agency could add as many as 10 drones to an inventory of between 30 and 35 already amassed. The Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-seeks-to-expand-drone-fleet-officials-say/2012/10/18/01149a8c-1949-11e2-bd10-5ff056538b7c_story.html">reported</a> Thursday:</p><blockquote><p>The proposal by CIA Director David H. Petraeus would bolster the agency’s ability to sustain its campaigns of lethal strikes in Pakistan and Yemen and enable it, if directed, to shift aircraft to emerging al-Qaeda threats in North Africa or other trouble spots, officials said.</p></blockquote><p>According to the WaPo's official source, if Petraeus' request is fulfilled, the move would "extend the spy service’s decade-long transformation into a paramilitary force." Indeed, the CIA's drone program has developed extensively and controversially in recent years. As Salon noted, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/drone_strikes_in_pakistan_counterproductive/">a recent study</a> found that the agency's strikes in Pakistan were "counter-productive" and terrorized civilians. Meanwhile, as WaPo noted Thursday, the "campaign of U.S. airstrikes in Yemen has heated up," with 35 strikes by the spy agency this year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/cia_wants_more_drones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/cia_wants_more_drones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security officer at US embassy in Yemen killed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/security_officer_at_us_embassy_in_yemen_killed_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/security_officer_at_us_embassy_in_yemen_killed_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embassy Attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Killing bears the hallmarks of an al-Qaida attack]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SANAA, Yemen (AP) -- A masked gunman assassinated a Yemeni security official at the U.S. Embassy in a drive-by shooting in the capital Sanaa on Thursday, officials said.</p><p>The Yemeni officials said the killing bore the hallmarks of an al-Qaida attack, but it was too early to determine if the group was behind it. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.</p><p>Anti-American violence in the Middle East has spiked over the past month, most of it triggered by an anti-Islam video made privately in the United States. On September 11 in the Libyan city of Benghazi, U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans - including two former Navy SEALs - were killed in what U.S. administration officials now describe as an act of terrorism. There is some debate about whether the attack was related to protests about the film or whether it was a premeditated attack unrelated to the film.</p><p>The latest attack in Yemen, however, may be more tied to domestic tensions. The assassination resembles other attacks targeting Yemeni intelligence, military and security officials in retaliation for a wide military offensive by Yemen's U.S.-backed government against al-Qaida's branch in the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/security_officer_at_us_embassy_in_yemen_killed_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/security_officer_at_us_embassy_in_yemen_killed_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
