<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/5494/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:00:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Letters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/olson_malcolm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/olson_malcolm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Malcolm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/letters/2001/11/30/olson_malcolm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Readers respond to Barbara Olson's hatchet job on the Clintons, a book on synesthesia and an interview with Janet Malcolm.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/books/review/2001/11/19/olson/index.html">Read "The Unsavory Martyr."</a> </p><p>Oh yes, with all of the crowing of the upcoming death of dissent, Salon pipes in with another defense of the Clinton empire. </p><p>As per the norm, if you are a leftist and complain you become an activist. </p><p>If you are anywhere else on the political spectrum you are simply a whiner. <p align="right">-- Joe Morgante </p><p>It seems like Mr. Lauerman's main complaint of Barbara Olson's book on Hillary Clinton is that it's mean to the president. Sure, he cites one, maybe two instances where her premises are faulty, but not enough to discredit the book's overall impression of the former First Lady. </p><p>Instead of criticizing a dead woman, maybe Lauerman should focus on a living breathing one -- the newest senator from the state of New York. Even in more benevolent hands, her story is as unsavory and censurable as they come. <p align="right">-- Dan Avery </p><p>Nineteen terrorists died on Sept. 11. With Barbara Olson the devil got an even twenty. <p align="right">-- Steve Gordon </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/olson_malcolm/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/olson_malcolm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
