<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Andrew J. Bacevich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/andrew_j_bacevich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Jerry Boykin the new McCarthy?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/is_jerry_boykin_the_new_mccarthy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/is_jerry_boykin_the_new_mccarthy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Boykin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13021193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jerry Boykin's ongoing crusade on Islamism has a familiar ring -- and he's making its impact felt abroad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First came the <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175283/" target="_blank">hullaballoo</a> over the “Mosque at Ground Zero.”  Then there was Pastor Terry Jones of Gainesville, Florida, grabbing headlines as he <a href="http://articles.nydailynews.com/2010-09-09/news/27074909_1_korans-president-obama-first-amendment" target="_blank">promoted</a> “International Burn-a-Koran Day.”  Most recently, we have an American posting a slanderous anti-Muslim video on the Internet with all the <a href="http://bostonglobe.com/news/world/2012/09/21/killed-during-protests-pakistan-against-anti-islamic-video/bI5xEYmpEDMCErPXV2m1SO/story.html" target="_blank">ensuing turmoil</a>.</p><p>Throughout, the official U.S. position has remained fixed: the United States government condemns Islamophobia.  Americans respect Islam as a religion of peace.  Incidents suggesting otherwise are the work of a tiny minority -- whackos, hatemongers, and publicity-seekers.  Among Muslims from Benghazi to Islamabad, the argument has proven to be a tough sell.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/is_jerry_boykin_the_new_mccarthy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/is_jerry_boykin_the_new_mccarthy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s secret warriors</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/obamas_secret_warriors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/obamas_secret_warriors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12928852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under his watch, the military's least accountable assets have become the pinnacle of military prestige]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As he campaigns for reelection, President Obama periodically reminds audiences of his success in terminating the deeply unpopular Iraq War. With fingers crossed for luck, he vows to do the same with the equally unpopular war in Afghanistan. If not exactly a peacemaker, our Nobel Peace Prize-winning president can (with some justification) at least claim credit for being a war-ender.</p><p>Yet when it comes to military policy, the Obama administration’s success in shutting down wars conducted in plain sight tells only half the story, and the lesser half at that. More significant has been this president’s enthusiasm for instigating or expanding secret wars, those conducted out of sight and by commandos.</p><p>President Franklin Roosevelt may not have invented the airplane, but during World War II he transformed strategic bombing into one of the principal emblems of the reigning American way of war. General Dwight D. Eisenhower had nothing to do with the Manhattan Project that developed the atomic bomb. Yet, as president, Ike’s strategy of Massive Retaliation made nukes the centerpiece of U.S. national security policy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/obamas_secret_warriors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/obamas_secret_warriors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How America conducts foreign policy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/barack_obama_iraq_yemen_libya_wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/barack_obama_iraq_yemen_libya_wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/12/barack_obama_iraq_yemen_libya_wars</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's administration, like those of his predecessors, blindly embraces military "solutions"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     <em>This piece originally appeared on&#160;<a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com">TomDispatch</a>.</em>   </p><p>It is a commonplace of American politics: when the moving van pulls up to the White House on Inauguration Day, it delivers not only a closetful of gray suits and power ties, but a boatload of expectations.</p><p>A president, being the most powerful man in the world, begins history anew -- so at least Americans believe, or pretend to believe. Out with the old, sordid, and disappointing; in with the fresh, unsullied, and hopeful. Why, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7845585.stm">with the stroke of a pen</a>, a new president can order the closing of an embarrassing and controversial off-shore prison for accused terrorists held for years on end without trial! Just like that: done.</p><p>For all sorts of reasons, the expectations raised by Barack Obama's arrival in the Oval Office were especially high. Americans weren't the only ones affected. How else to explain the Nobel Committee's decision to honor the new president by transforming its Peace Prize into a Prize Anticipating Peace -- more or less the equivalent of designating the winner of the Heisman Trophy during week one of the college football season.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/barack_obama_iraq_yemen_libya_wars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/barack_obama_iraq_yemen_libya_wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why military spending remains untouchable</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/pentagon_spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/pentagon_spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/27/pentagon_spending</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite extraordinary expenditures, it's clear that Americans just aren't getting much for their money]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     <em>This piece originally appeared at <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/">TomDispatch</a>.</em>   </p><p>In defense circles, &#8220;cutting&#8221; the Pentagon budget has once again become a topic of conversation. Americans should not confuse that talk with reality. Any cuts exacted will at most reduce the rate of growth. The essential facts remain: U.S. military outlays today equal that of every other nation on the planet combined, a situation without precedent in modern history.</p><p>The Pentagon presently spends more in constant dollars than it did at any time during the Cold War -- this despite the absence of anything remotely approximating what national security experts like to call a &#8220;peer competitor.&#8221; Evil Empire? It exists only in the fevered imaginations of those who quiver at the prospect of China adding a rust-bucket Russian aircraft carrier to its fleet or who take seriously the ravings of radical Islamists promising from deep inside their caves to unite the <em>Umma</em> in a new caliphate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/pentagon_spending/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/pentagon_spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
