<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Andy Birkey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/andy_birkey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:40:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should churches be used as polling spots?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/should_churches_be_used_as_polling_spots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/should_churches_be_used_as_polling_spots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13106374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voters from North Carolina to Minnesota have complained of their overt political messaging on Election Day ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.americanindependent.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/TheAmericanIndependent.jpg" alt="The American Independent" align="left" /></a> In South Saint Paul, Minn., on Election Day, residents showed up at St. John Vianney Catholic Church to vote and were greeted with a banner outside the polling place entrance that read, “Strengthen Marriage, Don’t Redefine It.”</p><p>Minnesota was voting on a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, and the Catholic Church had been the most vocal proponent of the ballot measure.</p><p>Voters snapped photos of the banner, which quickly gained attention on Twitter and Facebook.</p><p>Ivan Kowalenko took one of those photos. He told Minnesota Public Radio, “I was shocked, I didn’t think that would be allowed. I was hearing that you’re not allowed to wear any political slogan of your own, so it doesn’t seem entirely appropriate that a voting venue would be allowed to express an opinion.”</p><p>At a separate polling place at St. Joseph’s Church in West St. Paul, Stephanie Weiss was waiting in line to vote, and she noticed a sign posted to the wall. It was a prayer, written by Twin Cities Archbishop John Nienstedt, that urged Catholics to defend God’s plan for marriage — between one man and one woman.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/should_churches_be_used_as_polling_spots/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/should_churches_be_used_as_polling_spots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ending jury discrimination: For once, both parties agree</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/ending_jury_discrimination_for_once_both_parties_agree/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/ending_jury_discrimination_for_once_both_parties_agree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Juries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhode island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Whitehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Collins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13032188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new bill in the Senate would bar discrimination on federal juries on the basis of gender and sexual orientation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.americanindependent.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/TheAmericanIndependent.jpg" alt="The American Independent" align="left" /></a> A bill introduced in the U.S. Senate would bar discrimination on federal juries on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.</p><p>That bill follows an <a href="http://americanindependent.com/215836/discrimination-against-lgbt-jurors-remains-legal">investigation by The American Independent</a> in May that detailed instances where LGBT people may have been discriminated against during jury selection in both state and federal cases.</p><p>The bill was introduced on Sept. 21 by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat from New Hampshire, and is co-sponsored by Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine and Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island.</p><p>“Discriminating against a potential juror because of sexual orientation or gender identity is unacceptable, and it should not be tolerated,” <a href="http://www.shaheen.senate.gov/news/press/release/?id=b748b039-110a-482e-bc4c-77c4233dc738" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Shaheen said in a statement announcing the bill</a>. “Our country is founded on principles of inclusion and acceptance and the jury selection process should be no different.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/ending_jury_discrimination_for_once_both_parties_agree/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/ending_jury_discrimination_for_once_both_parties_agree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota&#8217;s attack on gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/minnesotas_attack_on_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/minnesotas_attack_on_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality Matters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13001638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opponents of same-sex unions are using a controversial study to push a discriminatory new amendment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.americanindependent.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/TheAmericanIndependent.jpg" alt="The American Independent" align="left" /></a> A controversial study on parenting has become a focal point of the campaign in Minnesota to pass a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage this November.</p><p>Conducted by University of Texas sociologist Mark Regnerus, the New Family Structures Study has been used by opponents of same-sex marriage to suggest that the children of same-sex couples fare poorly on a number of issues including relationships, abuse, and poverty.</p><p>But that’s not what the study actually says. Regnerus’ study compared children from families headed by married, heterosexual parents to children who were raised in families where one parent had a same-sex relationship at some point. The vast majority of the children whose parents had a same-sex relationship were either born out of wedlock or came from a “traditional family” that experienced a divorce. <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2012/06/new_family_structures_study_is_gay_parenthood_bad_or_is_gay_marriage_good_.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Critics say</a> that comparison is unfair because it compares broken homes to married ones.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/minnesotas_attack_on_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/minnesotas_attack_on_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
