<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Bill Greener</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/bill_greener/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>My GOP: Too old, too white to win</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/20/gop_math/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/20/gop_math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2009/07/20/gop_math</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Republican looks at the numbers and sees disaster ahead, unless his party figures out how to be less -- caucasian]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans can engage in complicated studies to determine the standing of our brand. We (after all, I most certainly am a Republican) can search for policy positions that better connect us to the concerns of voters. We can do any number of things to try to change our fortunes. Until we come to grips with some fundamental math, however, the numbers simply do not add up to the GOP prevailing in a national election any time soon.</p><p>In 1976, 90 percent of the votes cast in the presidential election came from non-Hispanic whites. In 2008, John McCain won this vote by a 56-43 margin. Had John McCain run in 1976 instead of 2008, not only would he have won, but he would have won the popular vote before a single non-white vote was cast. So, despite all the chatter about the impact of Sarah Palin, despite the unpopularity of President Bush, despite the difficulty of the same party winning a third consecutive national election, despite the charisma of Barack Obama (and the love shown to him by the mainstream media), despite the financial meltdown of September, despite any other factor anyone can cite, if John McCain had been the candidate at a time when non-Hispanic whites were the overwhelming majority of the voters, he would be president now.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/20/gop_math/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/20/gop_math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>347</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Obama has to stay above 50 percent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/27/undecideds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/27/undecideds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2008/10/27/undecideds</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A GOP operative argues that in a race between a white and black candidate, "undecideds" vote white. Meaning, "undecideds" will break for McCain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As his campaign manager has described it, John McCain is now looking at a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/17/us/politics/17campaign.html?_r=2&amp;ref=politics&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">"narrow-victory scenario."</a> "The fact that we're in the race at all," added Steve Schmidt, "is a miracle. Because the environment is so bad and the head wind is so strong."</p><p>But talk of miracles and head winds aside, I think John McCain really does have a decent shot at winning, and that's not just because I'm a longtime Republican political operative. Despite what the polls seem to be saying, a closer look at the numbers shows that a Democratic victory is not a foregone conclusion. Why? Because if history is any guide, Barack Obama, as an African-American candidate for political office, needs to be polling consistently above 50 percent to win. And in crucial battleground states, he isn't.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/10/27/undecideds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/27/undecideds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>267</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

