<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Cass Sunstein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/cass_sunstein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The I-word</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/09/impeachment_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/09/impeachment_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/06/09/impeachment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ralph Nader says the Downing Street memo is grounds to debate the impeachment of the president. Four constitutional scholars weigh the issue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Mark Tushnet,</b> Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law, Georgetown University Law Center </p><p>Ralph Nader <a target="_blank" href="http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/05/31/the_i_word/">wrote last week </a> that "mainstream political discourse" should include a discussion of impeaching President Bush and Vice President Cheney. Others have made similar observations. Economist Brad DeLong, for example, routinely ends many of his <a target="_blank" href="http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/">blog posts</a> with "Impeach Bush. Impeach Cheney. Impeach them now." The so-called <a href="/news/feature/2005/06/07/downing_street_memo/">Downing Street memo</a> is the latest occasion for their outrage. </p><p>The memo was written in 2002 as the Bush administration was building its case for attacking Iraq because of Saddam Hussein's possession of weapons of mass destruction and support for terrorism. According to the memo, the head of the British foreign intelligence service reported on "his recent talks in Washington," informing the leaders of Tony Blair's foreign policy team that "the intelligence and facts were being fixed" around the policy of removing Saddam Hussein. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/06/09/impeachment_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/09/impeachment_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

