<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Charlie Varon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/charlie_varon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 39 Results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/18/39_results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/18/39_results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/12/18/39_results</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Famous quotations on shuffle play.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What difference does the sequence of information make? Depends on who you ask -- John Cage or Noam Chomsky. In this Challenge we asked readers to press their "shuffle play" buttons and rearrange familiar quotations to produce new meanings. The pudding in the proof is! </p><p>THE WINNER </p><p>You want what you can't always get.<br /> (You can't always get what you want.)<br /> -- Greg Wehmeyer </p><p>HONORABLE MENTIONS </p><p>Vidi, vici, veni --<br /> I saw, I conquered, I came.<br /> (Veni, vidi, vici.)<br /> -- Arjen Kamphuis </p><p>Deep beauty is only skin.<br /> (Beauty is only skin deep.)<br /> -- Doug Gordon </p><p>"Well, I think if you say you're going to do something and don't do it, that's trustworthiness."<br /> ("Well, I think if you say you're going to do something and don't do it, that's trustworthiness." -- George W. Bush, CNN online chat, Aug. 30, 2000)<br /> -- Dave Romm </p><p>Something that he disagreed with ate him.<br /> (He ate something that disagreed with him.)<br /> -- David Bedno </p><p>And give a fish a man for to teach, and fish eats -- eats a man a day for a lifetime! He-he!<br /> (Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day; teach a man to fish, and he eats for a lifetime.)<br /> -- Keith Ammann </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/18/39_results/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/18/39_results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 39</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/01/chal_39/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/01/chal_39/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2000 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/12/01/chal_39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Word Order -- "shuffle play" fun with sentences.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us now praise the genius who invented the random or "shuffle play" button on the CD player. Beethoven may be rolling around in his grave when you play the movements of the "Eroica" out of order; but, hello! a new musical possibility has been unleashed. </p><p>If it can be so for music, why not for words? </p><p>Readers are invited to submit up to three familiar sentences, with word order scrambled so that the original meaning is subtly or radically altered. Include the original text below your alteration. </p><p>EXAMPLE </p><p>When the Romans, like, do Rome in.<br /> (When in Rome, do like the Romans.) </p><p>RULES </p><p>Send your submissions via e-mail only to <a href="mailto:salon21st@salon.com">salon21st@salon.com.</a> Please include your full name and an accurate e-mail address so we can contact you if you're a winner. By submitting your entry, you give Salon Technology permission to publish, edit and reuse it. Deadline for entries is Dec. 8, 2000. </p><p>PRIZES </p><p>The winning response will receive a copy of Salon Technology editor Andrew Leonard's book, "Bots: The Origin of New Species." </p><p>In two weeks we'll publish a winner and some selected entries -- then start over a couple weeks after that with a whole new challenge. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/01/chal_39/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/01/chal_39/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 38 Results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/17/38_results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/17/38_results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/11/17/38_results</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The secret life of three-letter acronyms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We abbreviate to save time. Yet this everyday encryption also serves to obscure meaning from outsiders and eventually even from those who once knew what the terms meant. In this challenge, we asked readers to explain the hidden meaning of common three-letter acronyms (TLAs). </p><p>One self-described nit-picker reminded us that a real acronym is pronounceable as a word, like SCUBA and laser. We stand corrected, but unbowed. And perhaps one of the best entries, from Dan Norton, came in over the three-letter limit: "PCMCIA -- People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms." </p><p>THE WINNER </p><p>PDA: Public Display of Affluence<br /> -- Keith Amman </p><p>HONORABLE MENTIONS </p><p>CRT: Cheap Radiation Therapy<br /> -- Mark Q. Moore </p><p>FTP: Find The Porn<br /> -- Janne More'n </p><p>JPG: Just Porn, Gentlemen<br /> -- John Cave </p><p>IPO: Idiot's Pyrrhic Optimism<br /> -- Jeff Ryan </p><p>SUV: Suburban Uneasiness Vehicle<br /> -- Nancy Ott </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/11/17/38_results/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/17/38_results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 38</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/03/chal_38/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/03/chal_38/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/11/03/chal_38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The secret life of three-letter acronyms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a previous Challenge, we asked readers to explain the true meaning of the ubiquitous "http://www." Memorable entries included "Hands to the Pants, Wanton Willing Women." </p><p>In this Challenge, we turn to the Three Letter Acronyms (TLAs) that litter our increasingly technologized world. What does VCR <i>really</i> stand for? SUV? .jpg? </p><p>Readers are invited to submit up to three well-known TLAs -- and illuminate their true meaning. </p><p>EXAMPLE </p><p>CPU: Computer Packaging, Undisposable </p><p>RULES </p><p>Send your submissions via e-mail only to <a href="mailto:salon21st@salon.com">salon21st@salon.com.</a> Please include your full name and an accurate e-mail address so we can contact you if you're a winner. By submitting your entry, you give Salon Technology permission to publish, edit and reuse it. Deadline for entries is Nov. 10, 2000. </p><p>PRIZES </p><p>The winning response will receive a copy of Salon Technology editor Andrew Leonard's book, "Bots: The Origin of New Species." </p><p>In two weeks we'll publish a winner and some selected entries -- then start over a couple weeks after that with a whole new challenge. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/11/03/chal_38/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/03/chal_38/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 37 results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/20/37_results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/20/37_results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/10/20/37_results</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New devices to measure bombast, pet stress, beauty and other imponderables.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you measure up these days? Too much body fat? Sub-Mensa I.Q.? Mutual funds lagging the index? The affluent consumer is confronted with an ever-widening array of devices that measure the hitherto unmeasured. In this challenge we asked readers to invent new measuring devices and units of measure. Thanks to all who rose to the challenge. </p><p>THE WINNER </p><p><b>Informal Conversion Calculator</b><br /> How much is a metric shitload? How many blue moons to a dog year? The Informal Conversion Calculator puts fuzzy logic in the palm of your hand, allowing you to translate between indeterminate quantities with absolute accuracy. Special module available for calculating actual costs of urban light rail.<br /> -- <i>Tom Sackett</i> </p><p>HONORABLE MENTIONS </p><p><b>Visionary-ometer</b><br /> Detects the precise amount of baloney being emitted from the mouth of the owner of an Internet start-up and produces an approximation, give or take four business days, of when company paychecks will begin to bounce.<br /> -- <i> Debi Lewis </i> </p><p><b>Payback 6000 by ColdSweat Labs</b><br /> Are YOU the Hardest-Working Man in Show Business? Find out with the Payback 6000! Accurately measures the energy in every "Hep!" "Hey!" and "Wow!" Digital display shows both pW (picoWilsons) and nC (nanoCookes). Good God!<br /> -- <i> Herb Robinson </i> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/20/37_results/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/20/37_results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 37</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/06/challenge_37/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/06/challenge_37/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2000 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/10/06/challenge_37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Measure for measure: Gizmos to gauge things hitherto unquantified.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Cyclometers can turn even a leisurely Sunday bike ride into a high-performance event by measuring distance traveled, speed, heart rate and even the number of pedal rotations each minute."<br /> -- New York Times, August 2000 </p><p>In the beginning was the stick. Then came the ruler, the plumb bob, the egg timer. And now, in the Silicon Age, human beings have created chip-based gizmos to measure absolutely everything. Or have we? </p><p>Readers are invited to invent a device -- hand-held or smaller -- that can measure something as yet unmeasurable. Give us its name, any new units of measurement and up to 50 words of Sharper Image catalog prose telling us why we cannot live another day without it. </p><p>EXAMPLE </p><p><b>Speech gun</b><br /> Slow talkers got you down? Turn your speech gun on a colleague, politician or spouse. A chime sounds when the speaker falls below five syllables per second. Optional "Uh" counter available. </p><p>RULES </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/06/challenge_37/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/06/challenge_37/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dot what?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/15/36_results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/15/36_results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2000 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/09/15/36_results</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New top-level domain ideas for fun and profit -- or, well, at least fun.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the domain name motherlode running out of English language ore, we <a href="/tech/chal/2000/09/01/challenge_36 ">challenged readers</a> to submit new suffixes for Web sites, so called "top level domains" (TLDs). Many serious and worthwhile name schemes were submitted, most of which we promptly filtered out. And in a sign of how well trained you are, most submissions used only three characters, though we did not impose this limit, nor does ICANN, which administers the domain system. </p><p>We'll forward our winning entry to ICANN as soon as someone steps forward with the $50,000 application fee. </p><p>THE WINNER </p><p><b>.not</b><br> www.microsoft.not<br> www.harvard.not<br> The .not top level domain (TLD) is intended for sites that criticize or parody the sites in the other TLDs. The sites in the .not TLD will thus constitute a parallel or shadow Web, commenting on the "real" Web. A person or organization will not be permitted to own a domain name in the .not TLD if he owns the same name under a different TLD. For example, the Coca-Cola Company is prohibited from registering cocacola.not.<br> -- David Radcliffe </p><p>HONORABLE MENTIONS </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/15/36_results/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/15/36_results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 36</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/01/challenge_36/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/01/challenge_36/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2000 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/09/01/challenge_36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dot what? New top-level domain names for fun, if not profit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In just a few short years the dot-com gold diggers have staked claim to all available surface deposits of short, recognizable English words. Latecomers who want to start a Web site are left to pick through the tailings or pay top dollar to claim jumpers for what once seemed rightfully theirs. </p><p>What's needed -- and everyone involved has known this for Internet eons -- is more suffixes. These are the top-level domain names like .com, .org, etc. To that end, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers is soliciting <a target="new" href="http://www.icann.org/tlds/tld-application-process.htm"> proposals</a> for new top-level domains. </p><p>And we're here to help. Readers are challenged to submit a new suffix and briefly describe its purpose. You're also welcome to submit a sample that takes advantage of your new top-level domain. </p><p>EXAMPLE </p><p>www.microstrategy<b>.con</b> </p><p>The .con domain is intended to help differentiate the truly egregious from the merely aggressive business innovators. </p><p>RULES </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/01/challenge_36/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/01/challenge_36/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 35 Results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/23/35_results_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/23/35_results_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/08/23/35_results</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Practice random acts of brevity: What happens when politicians are limited to five words?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webbys allow winners five words. </p><p>Why not limit politicians, too? </p><p>We <a href="/tech/chal/2000/08/04/number_35/index.html">asked you</a> to try. </p><p>Results show: Less is more. </p><p>Thanks for playing our game! </p><p>THE WINNER </p><p>"Promise: No sex, just Gore." <br>-- Mary Waggoner </p><p>HONORABLE MENTIONS </p><p>Every political speech throughout history: <br>"I am promising the impossible." <br>-- Steve Leahy </p><p>All political speeches can be boiled down to five words: <br>"I'm not the other guy!" <br>-- Samantha Lynn </p><p>"You'll never catch me lying." <br>-- Jeff Taylor </p><p>The Lincoln-Douglas debates: <br>"The tall guy always wins." <br>-- Samantha Lynn </p><p>"What's worst about censorship is ..." <br>-- Glenn Hauman </p><p><b>Suggestions for George W. Bush</b> </p><p>"I will avenge you, father." <br>-- Erik Hansen </p><p>"How many words? Five? Whoops." <br>-- Francis Heaney </p><p>"My middle name is different." <br>-- Tom Davidson </p><p>Inaugural Address, President George W. Bush: <br>"Check out dubya dubya DUBYA!" <br>-- Greg Sarab </p><p><b>More for Albert Gore Jr.</b> </p><p>"I SWEAR I'm not Clinton." <br>-- Deborah Lewis </p><p>"Win one for the Tipper!" <br>-- Eli Neiburger </p><p>"My emotion chip is overheating." <br>-- Erik Hansen </p><p>"Won't screw up economy, interns." <br>-- M. Turyn </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/23/35_results_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/23/35_results_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 35</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/04/number_35/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/04/number_35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2000 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/08/04/number_35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Practice random acts of brevity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inundated by data? Overflowing with info? Our neural pathways clogged, we naturally seek relief. Some respond by multitasking, others by retreating on a media fast. But why not stop churning out so many words in the first place? What if we cultivated terseness? </p><p>At the Webby Awards winners are permitted only five words for their <a target="new" href="http://www.webbys.com/event/webcast/awards/">acceptance speeches.</a> Why not apply a similar limit to this year's presidential candidates' speeches accepting their party's nomination? Or to any other significant political speech, past present or future. Care to have a crack at the Gettysburg Address or "I Have a Dream"? </p><p>Readers are permitted up to three entries, each no more than five words. Make the most of them! </p><p>RULES </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/04/number_35/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/04/number_35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 34 Results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/25/35_results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/25/35_results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2000 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/07/25/35_results</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Pink slips blossoming in Mountain View" and other haiku for the dot-com downturn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a start-up fails in the valley and no one is there to turn off the servers, can I still get free shipping? </p><p>Now that some hot air has dissipated from the industry, we asked readers in this <a href="/tech/chal/2000/06/30/number_34/index.html">challenge</a> to meditate on the present moment -- and to do so in haiku form. Once again, we're delighted with the results. </p><p>THE WINNER </p><p>Ten thousand stock shares <br>Papers collecting dust now <br>Me doing drywall <br>-- Noble Smith </p><p>HONORABLE MENTIONS </p><p>When profit is nil, <br>wealth fades faster than the sun. <br>What would Bezos do? <br>-- Heather L. Barnes </p><p>I heard your dot-com <br>laid you off. That's too bad. Send <br>me your risumi? <br>-- Dave Stagner </p><p>Fuck your damn options. <br>This surly civil servant <br>Won't get burned like you. <br>-- Curtis Linderman </p><p>Cool summer: pink slips <br>blossoming in Mountain View; <br>dot-coms bear bitter fruit. <br>-- Nick Sweeney </p><p>We will get rich quick. <br>No real ideas, just Web page. <br>Whoops! Buyers catch on. <br>-- Josiah Madigan </p><p>Foolish to plan to <br>retire at twenty-seven. <br>Twenty-nine is fine. <br>-- David Nett </p><p>Sixty thousand shares. <br>Multiply by price per share. <br>Sixty thousand cents. <br>-- Gence Soysal </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/25/35_results/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/25/35_results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 34</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/30/number_34/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/30/number_34/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/06/30/number_34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dot-com rise-and-fall haiku.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>dea! Financing!<br> Web launch! IPO! Soaring<br> stock! Plummeting stock! </p><p>In this contest we return to the poetic form of haiku -- that calm and timeless way of encountering reality. We invite readers to apply the haiku form and sensibility to the current economic moment -- when so many high-tech hopes have apparently been dashed, and yet others are still aborning. </p><p>Readers may submit up to three haiku poems. (The haiku is a three-line poem in the 5/7/5 form: first line five syllables, second line seven, third line five.) </p><p>E X A M P L E </p><p>Fluttering oak leaf? <br> toppled cypress? each high-tech <br> stock falls diff'rently </p><p>R U L E S </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/30/number_34/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/30/number_34/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 33 Results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/06/33_results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/06/33_results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/05/06/33_results</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Warning: Exiting womb" and other real-life dialog box alerts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>C</b>autious reminders haunt our every software interaction. Each command is followed by a dialog box asking, in effect: Do you really mean it?</p><p>What are the engineers saying? Proceed with caution? You are not to be trusted? We know not what we do? Whether you find such messages reassuring or annoying, they're an established form of punctuation in our workflow. Nagware: Can't compute without it.</p><p>But what of the rest of our lives? In this <a href="/tech/chal/2000/04/22/number_33/index.html">Challenge,</a> we asked readers to propose reminders for the rest of our lives. Are you sure you want to read further ...?</p><p>THE WINNER</p><p>WARNING: Exiting womb. Are you sure you want to proceed?<br />
<br> -- Stephen Thompson</p><p>HONORABLE MENTIONS</p><p>Warning: This action cannot be undone<br />
<br> Are you sure you want to move "/your entire life" to "/follow your dreams"?<br />
<br> -- Jacky Sin</p><p>(on Alan Greenspan's machine)<br />
<br> Are you sure you want to increase the prime rate?<br />
<br> [Yes] [Yes] [Yes]<br />
<br> -- Keith Ammann</p><p>Are you sure you can pull out in time?<br />
<br> -- Sandra Hess</p><p>Are you sure that the voices inside my head aren't telling me what to do?<br />
<br> -- M. Mahoney</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/06/33_results/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/06/33_results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 33</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/22/number_33/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/22/number_33/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/04/22/number_33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real-life dialog-box alerts: Are you sure you want to ...?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>re you sure you want to exit? delete<br />
this document? close the application<br />
without backing up?</p><p>With dialog-box messages like these,<br />
our computers show they are worried for<br />
us. They fear that in haste we'll do<br />
something that we'll live to regret.</p><p>What if our computers began cautioning<br />
us about the reckless decisions we<br />
make in the <i>rest</i> of our lives?</p><p>Are you sure you want to ingest a muffin<br />
containing 1.7 grams of partially<br />
hydrogenated cottonseed oil?</p><p>Are you sure you want to marry someone<br />
without asking for references?</p><p>Are you sure you want to vote for a<br />
candidate whose wealth exceeds that of<br />
Nova Scotia?</p><p>Readers are invited to submit up to five<br />
"Are You Sure ...?" messages, each no<br />
more than 40 words. You may choose to<br />
include the name of the person on whose<br />
screen the message is popping up.</p><p>R U L E S</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/22/number_33/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/22/number_33/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 32 Results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/08/32_results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/08/32_results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/04/08/32_results</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Within every tech company&#039;s name there lurks a hilarious acronym.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n this challenge, we invited you to crack the acronymic code of   any well-known high-tech firm and, by so doing, unlock its corporate credo.</p><p><b>C</b>orporations<br />
<br><b>H</b>ide<br />
<br><b>A</b>cronyms,<br />
<br><b>L</b>argely<br />
<br><b>L</b>ike<br />
<br><b>E</b>mbarrassing<br />
<br><b>N</b>ames,<br />
<br><b>G</b>uess<br />
<br><b>E</b>ntrants</p><p>THE WINNER</p><p><b>P</b>romised<br />
<br><b>R</b>adical<br />
<br><b>I</b>nversion?<br />
<br><b>C</b>aveat<br />
<br><b>E</b>mptor!<br />
<br><b>L</b>etting<br />
<br><b>I</b>ndividuals<br />
<br><b>N</b>egotiate<br />
<br><b>E</b>liminates<br />
<br><b>C</b>rappy<br />
<br><b>O</b>verstock<br />
<br><b>M</b>erchandise<br><br />
--Keith Ammann</p><p>HONORABLE MENTIONS</p><p><b>M</b>ight<br />
<br><b>I</b><br />
<br><b>C</b>alamitously<br />
<br><b>R</b>educe<br />
<br><b>O</b>ur<br />
<br><b>S</b>tock<br />
<br><b>T</b>hrough<br />
<br><b>R</b>oughshod<br />
<br><b>A</b>ccounting<br />
<br><b>T</b>rickery?<br />
<br><b>E</b>xecutives<br />
<br><b>G</b>o<br />
<br><b>Y</b>achting.<br><br />
--Michael Casey</p><p><b>I</b>n<br />
<br><b>N</b>ervous<br />
<br><b>T</b>imes<br />
<br><b>E</b>ngineers<br />
<br><b>L</b>itigate<br><br />
--Guillermo Ibarra</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/08/32_results/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/08/32_results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 32</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/25/number_32/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/25/number_32/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/03/25/number_32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Credos of the high-tech world -- unencrypted!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>L</b>urking in every company's name is an acronym, intentional or otherwise. In this Challenge, we're interested in the "otherwise."</p><p>Readers are invited to crack the acronymic code of any well-known high-tech firm and, by so doing, unlock its corporate credo.</p><p>We welcome up to three original submissions from each entrant.</p><p>E X A M P L E</p><p>Money<br />
<br> Is<br />
<br> Cherished!<br />
<br> Retaliate<br />
<br> Often!<br />
<br> Steal<br />
<br> Only<br />
<br> Finest<br />
<br> Talent!<br />
<br></p><p>R U L E S</p><p>Send your submissions via e-mail only to <a href="mailto:salon21st@salon.com">salon21st@salon.com.</a> Please include your full name and an accurate e-mail address so we can contact you if you're a winner. By submitting your entry you give Salon Technology permission to publish it. Deadline for entries is April 3, 2000.</p><p>P R I Z E S</p><p>The winning response will receive a copy of Salon Technology senior correspondent Andrew Leonard's book, "Bots: The Origin of New Species."</p><p>In two weeks we'll publish a winner and some selected entries -- then start over a couple of weeks after that with a whole new challenge.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/25/number_32/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/25/number_32/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 31 Results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/11/31_results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/11/31_results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/03/11/31_results</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Pez Dispens&#039;d" and other couplets in praise of tech gadgets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>t last, a chance to demonstrate how well-versed in technology you really are. In this challenge, we asked you to write a couplet in iambic pentameter extolling an element of our modern world. Though not all could master the meter, the following entries are worthy tries. Like all poetry, 'tis best if read aloud for others to hear. Or not.</p><p>THE WINNER</p><p>Hard pressed for other means, we can but hope<br />
<br> To know the human heart by stethoscope.<br />
<br>  -- Thomas Jenkins</p><p>HONORABLE MENTIONS</p><p>My heart leaps up, my troubled ears are glad,<br />
<br> When I do thumb the key that mutes the ad.<br />
<br>  -- John M. Ford</p><p>Soft, what ware chokes on cookies, spam and bots<br />
<br> To surf links 'cross reality ersatz.<br />
<br>  -- Doug Muehlhauser</p><p>Couch potato, how did this come to pass?<br />
<br> My clicker thumb is fat as my ass.<br />
<br>  -- Pedro F. Vazquez</p><p>These trees will stay standing thanks to Salon,<br />
<br> Since all printed magazines soon will be gone!<br />
<br>   -- Anthony Dodd</p><p><i>Pez Dispens'd</i><br><br />
What are thou, Pez, that must needs be dispensed?<br />
<br> T' be merely wrapped would leave thee so incensed?<br />
<br> T'were better still to leave the fingers sticky,<br />
<br> Than be vomited up by the likes of Mickey.<br />
<br>  -- Mark Janello</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/11/31_results/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/11/31_results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 31</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/26/challenge_31/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/26/challenge_31/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/02/26/challenge_31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shall I compare thee to a transistor? Shakespearean odes to technology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>f Shakespeare were to rise from the dead and be plunked down in, say, San<br />
Jose next week, what would he write? Dramas of Silicon Valley intrigue, no<br />
doubt -- but also poetry.</p><p>Readers are invited to create up to three rhyming couplets of iambic pentameter<br />
that celebrate a modern appliance, convenience or contrivance. A couplet is two lines of poetry; iambic pentameter is a metric scheme in which each line consists of 10 syllables in five "feet" -- primarily iambs (an unstressed syllable followed by a stressed one), though occasional variations may be introduced.</p><p>E X A M P L E</p><p>The milk, the bread, the yams wrapped tight in foil/All kept from spoiling by your wondrous coils.</p><p>R U L E S</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/26/challenge_31/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/26/challenge_31/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 30 Results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/12/challenge_30_results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/12/challenge_30_results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/02/12/challenge_30_results</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cloudy crystal-balling: When techno-predictions go awry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>G</b>uessing wrong isn't as easy as some prognosticators make it look. We asked readers to spoof shortsighted predictions out of the past -- the kind that orbit the Net via e-mail, like some ghost satellite, still beeping out archaic signals from 1967.</p><p>The following pronouncements may seem patently impossible, but we've learned never to sell the future short. Given enough time, the future has a way of coming back to bite us on the ass.</p><p>THE WINNER</p><p>Nobody's toaster needs an IP address.<br />
<br> -- Jason Tiscione</p><p>HONORABLE MENTIONS</p><p>It would be immoral to install an ON/OFF switch in the family pet.<br />
<br> -- Brian E. Bradley</p><p>Given that some Machine Intelligences like to keep pets, I think there may be a galactic market for maybe 50,000 humans.<br />
<br> <i>Strategic Planner, IBM (Interstellar Biological Materials)</i><br />
<br> -- Glenn D. Brown</p><p>Genetic engineering may have its uses, but who the heck would want to hear a dog talk?<br />
<br> -- Steve Gattuso</p><p>I really don't want my bathroom fixtures gossiping with the neighbor's doorknob.<br />
<br> -- Brian E. Bradley</p><p>Even if the ReAnimatizer does work on Richard Nixon, nobody'd be crazy enough to elect him president.<br />
<br> -- Bob Perlman</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/12/challenge_30_results/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/12/challenge_30_results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21st Challenge No. 30</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/29/number_30/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/29/number_30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/chal/2000/01/29/number_30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cloudy crystal-balling: When techno-predictions go awry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Jan.   29, 2000</font></p><p>"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."<br><br />
-- Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943</p><p>"There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home."<br><br />
-- Ken Olsen, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977</p><p>"Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?"<br><br />
 --  H.M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927</p><p><b>T</b>he above quotes are gleaned from an e-mail "forward" that arrives most  frequently at the turn of the year. What is it that's so satisfying about reading predictions that didn't pan out? The know-it-all naysayer proved wrong! The short-sighted given their comeuppance!</p><p>We celebrate the rollover to 2000 on our collective odometer by inviting  readers to create predictions for technological breakthroughs that may or may not occur sometime in the next thousand years. Keep your quotations under 40 words. Attribute them if you like.</p><p>E X A M P L E</p><p>"Who's going to want a metal coil implanted in their tongue, even  if it could tell you when you've eaten enough?"</p><p>R U L E S</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/29/number_30/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/29/number_30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

