Charlotte Higgins

“Exquisite” discovery

An unknown Bach aria for soprano and harpsichord turns up after spending three centuries in a shoebox.

For three centuries it was hidden in an old shoebox, concealed beneath a couple of blank pages. But Tuesday music experts across the world were hailing the discovery of a previously unknown work by the German composer and genius of the Baroque era, Johann Sebastian Bach. The work, for a soprano and harpsichord, was written in October 1713 as a birthday present for Bach’s patron, Duke Wilhelm Ernst of Saxe-Weimar.

Bach, then the court organist in Weimar, penned the composition to go with a 12-stanza poem dedicated to the duke, but its existence was swiftly forgotten. The manuscript was apparently swept away into a box, together with numerous other poems and letters written to celebrate the duke’s 52nd birthday.

The library in Weimar where the music was stored for several centuries recently burned down, but by chance, the box containing the score had already been removed. Two weeks ago a member of the Bach Archive in Leipzig, Germany, Michael Maul, stumbled on the composition while looking through material relevant to Bach’s tempestuous but thinly documented life. The box contained more than 100 poems and verses, together with a mysterious “strophic aria.”

Proof that the work was genuine came when experts compared the hand-penned manuscript with Bach’s writing.

“After Michael and I had identified it as Bach’s, we opened a very expensive bottle of Champagne,” Peter Wollny, head of research at the Bach Archive, in Leipzig, said Tuesday. “Michael came back from Weimar two weeks ago and said he had found something interesting. We got the microfilm of the score last week. We compared it with Bach’s known compositions — and bingo.”

He added: “The last time anything by Bach was discovered was 80 years ago. So far we’ve only heard it on the computer. But it’s a charming little work, written for one singer — a soprano — and a harpsichord. There’s a little postlude at the end for a string ensemble — two violins, a viola and a cello. It takes just four or five minutes to play.”

British conductor Sir John Eliot Gardiner, who has been asked by the Bach archive to perform and record the aria, said: “It’s so exciting. Maul has been sleuthing away, looking at the records in Weimar, which is something of a forgotten town in terms of Bach’s history.”

Gardiner believes the aria is likely to be part of a longer cantata. “It is absolutely beautiful. So many of Bach’s cantatas went missing after he died. His son Wilhelm Friedemann Bach was pretty profligate with his father’s stuff. He sold manuscripts off, lost them, used them as fire lighters. So when something like this turns up it is wonderful.

“It’s a reflective, meditative, soothing piece, as Bach’s church music so often is. It’s not going to set the world alight — enough of Bach’s music from this early to mid-period has survived to give us a sense of his musical personality at that time — but it’s just great to have this because every one of his cantatas and arias is on a completely different level from all of his contemporaries.”

Gardiner plans to record the piece before Christmas and perform it at London’s Cadogan Hall on Dec. 18.

Wollny Tuesday said that the composition sheds fresh light on Bach’s enigmatic early career in Weimar, a small town in central Germany, which was later made famous by Goethe but at the time boasted just 5,000 inhabitants.

Born in 1685 into a highly musical family, Bach worked as court organist in Weimar from 1708 to 1717. He was also a member of the town’s chamber orchestra, which he led from 1714. During this period he was rapidly becoming famous, not just for his compositions but as Germany’s greatest organist. His storming performances frightened the organ builders.

“We hardly know anything about Bach from this period because very little has survived,” Wollny said Tuesday. “There are very few compositions. It fills a black hole in his artistic career. It also tells us a great deal about his musical and vocal style during the Weimar period.”

So delighted was the Bach Archive by its discovery that it Tuesday flew in professor Christoph Wolff, the world’s leading expert on Bach, from Harvard University. Wolff said he was convinced the work was genuine, and described it as “an exquisite and highly refined strophic aria, Bach’s only contribution to a musical genre popular in late 17th century Germany.” Other stunning Bach discoveries could follow, he predicted.

The box where the manuscript was discovered, said Wollny, was only removed from the library because the researcher, a bookbinder, was interested in the rare marble paper on which the work was written. “Otherwise it would have been burned down in the fire. Nobody would have known that it existed,” Wollny said.

There has been no previous record of, or reference to, the composition, which has the words “aria,” “soprano solo” and “ritornello” written at the top. The last time an undiscovered piece by Bach turned up was when a cantata was found, but the work was a mere fragment.

Elvis does Hans

He never wanted to be a rock star, so it's fitting that the Danish Royal Opera has asked Costello to write a song cycle based on the life of Hans Christian Andersen.

Elvis Costello has made a career out of confounding his fans. Over the years the man behind Oliver’s Army has made a country album, worked with Burt Bacharach and made an unashamedly romantic album of love songs. Now he looks likely to baffle audiences again — by writing an opera. Costello is preparing to write a piece of lyric theater based on the life of Hans Christian Andersen. It will premiere at the Danish Royal Opera in October.

He has made several forays into the classical music world already, having composed a ballet and collaborated with both the Brodsky Quartet and Swedish mezzo-soprano Anne Sofie von Otter. But the complexities of operatic writing will provide him with his biggest challenge yet.

According to Henrik Engelbrecht, head of dramaturgy at the Royal Danish Opera: “We looked around the serious end of the rock scene for a person we thought could contribute to our art form. We very quickly came up with Elvis. We went to see him in Dublin with the idea of doing something about Hans Christian Andersen. We thought we would be teaching him about Andersen but he knew all about him. He already had a very operatic idea: that of a staged song cycle connected with the life of Andersen and actually about the writer’s obsession with Jenny Lind [the Swedish soprano].

“There is an element of fiction: In Costello’s version, Andersen has written Lind a number of secret arias (he was also something of an actor and composer), and the scenario is that he presents his pieces to her for the first time to sing.”

The 50-year-old singer-songwriter has consistently expressed his unwillingness to be remembered for “a handful of songs [he] wrote 25 years ago.” Or, more tersely: “I don’t give a fuck about being a rock ‘n’ roll star. I just want to do the things that interest me.” Costello said last year: “All the music comes out of the same head. It’s just using different methods to get at the solution to whatever motivated you to write it in the first place.”

Costello has in his time curated the South Bank festival Meltdown, and in 2000 took to the stage at the Hoxton New Music Days in London to do a surprise turn with the contemporary classical group the Composers’ Ensemble.

He taught himself to read music 10 years ago. On composing his ballet score, “Il Sogno” (based on “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”), he wrote: “I deliberately set aside modern methods involving computers, preferring a pencil and paper. The 200-page score was completed in approximately 10 weeks.” The work was commissioned by the Italian company Aterballeto in 2000.

Asked why the Danish Royal Opera had looked to the world of rock, Engelbrecht said: “What we have is an art form that is 400 years old, and has developed. We don’t do opera seria like we did in the 18th century … One of the tasks we think we have is to look at other forms — dance, rock and film — anything that can invigorate our own art form.”

The Danish Royal Opera — whose new opera house opened Wednesday night with “Aida,” starring Roberto Alagna, and which will this spring premiere an opera by “Handmaid’s Tale” composer Poul Ruders based on Franz Kafka’s “The Trial” — will invite Costello to perform the song cycle in October. The work should be fully staged on the opera house’s studio stage the following year. A director and cast have yet to be appointed.

Continue Reading Close

The most influential piece of modern art

Something by Picasso or Matisse? No, just a humble urinal, according to a poll of 500 experts.

A humble porcelain urinal — reclining on its side and marked with a false signature — has been named the world’s most influential piece of modern art, knocking Pablo Picasso and Henri Matisse from their traditional positions of supremacy.

Marcel Duchamp’s “Fountain,” created in 1917, has been interpreted in innumerable different ways, including as a reference to the female sexual parts. However, what is clear is the direct link between Duchamp’s “readymade,” as the artist called it, and the conceptual art that dominates today — Tracey Emin’s “My Bed” being a prime example.

According to art expert Simon Wilson, “the Duchampian notion that art can be made of anything has finally taken off. And not only about formal qualities, but about the ‘edginess’ of using a urinal and thus challenging bourgeois art.”

The Duchamp came out top in a survey of 500 artists, curators, critics and dealers commissioned by the sponsor of the Turner prize, Gordon’s. Different categories of respondents chose markedly different works, with artists in particular plumping overwhelmingly for “Fountain.”

“It feels like there is a new generation out there saying, ‘Cut the crap — Duchamp opened up modern art,’” said Wilson. He said that it was “something of a shock” that Pablo Picasso was not top, particularly since, he argued, the artist’s cubist constructions of 1912 to 1914 were Duchamp’s “jumping-off point.” However, Picasso has not been totally erased: “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon” and “Guernica” were second and fourth in the survey.

Wilson said: “‘Les Demoiselles’ was the beginning of cubism, and cubism was the most influential formal innovation in modern art. This is the single work to which we can pin the origins of modern art.” Of “Guernica” — the artist’s unflinching depiction of the horrors of the Spanish civil war — Wilson said: “Picasso reestablished that art could be modern and still deal with historical events, which had been junked by impressionism.”

Andy Warhol’s “Marilyn Diptych” — with its resonances of celebrity, death and tragedy — was named the third most influential work, and Matisse’s “The Red Studio,” the fifth. Extraordinarily, however, not a single artist put Matisse among his or her top choices.

“Today’s artists expect art to contain some social or political comment, even if that’s very indirect,” said Wilson. “Matisse said that his art was like an armchair into which one sinks at the end of the day — it’s a sort of pure sensuousness that artists today don’t warm to.”

And the rest of the top 10: 6) Joseph Beuys, “I Like America and America Likes Me,” 7) Constantin Brancusi, “Endless Column,” Jackson Pollock, “One: No. 31,” 9) Donald Judd, “100 Untitled Works in Mill Aluminum” and 10) Henry Moore, “Reclining Figure” (1929).

Continue Reading Close

“Fahrenheit” breaks UK record

Moore documentary smashes box-office records on opening weekend.

Fahrenheit 9/11, director Michael Moore’s unflinching satire on George Bush’s administration and the American right, has broken box office records in the UK.

It had the best ever opening weekend for a documentary, grossing more than #1.3m. Its nearest rival is Moore’s earlier documentary, Bowling for Columbine, which took #157,898 in the equivalent period.

In the US Fahrenheit 9/11 has become the first documentary to reach the number one box office spot. Moore said after its first week in cinemas that he was “knocked for a loop”. Whether the film fulfils his ambition of toppling the Bush administration is another question.

The film traces alleged business links between the Bin Laden and Bush families and contains some particularly biting and witty material on Mr Bush’s apparently casual attitude to his presidential responsibilities before September 11 2001.

At its emotional heart lies the bleak notion that the Iraq war saw the ruthless exploitation of the American working class, particularly its ethnic-minority working class, as cannon fodder.

The film was the surprise winner of the Palme D’Or at the Cannes film festival in May, but even before then had been controversial, with Disney  parent company of Miramax, which made the film  saying it was too political for it to distribute in the US.

Harvey and Bob Weinstein, the brothers behind Miramax, bought back the rights and a distributor was found at the 11th hour.

Continue Reading Close
www.salon.com/writer/charlotte_higgins/index.html