<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Danya Ruttenberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/danya_ruttenberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Art history 101</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/25/artmatters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/25/artmatters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/1999/10/25/artmatters</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legendary arts educator Philip Yenawine talks about the effrontery of art collectors, irresponsible artists and the willful ignorance of the average American male.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>F</b>or legendary arts educator Philip Yenawine, witnessing the art world's feeble response to the continuing "Sensations" imbroglio is like enduring a lover's clueless, self-destructive patterns: He's seen it before, he'll see it again; but he cares too much to not try to fix what he can.</p><p>Yenawine is co-editor of the new book "Art Matters: How The Culture Wars Changed America" (NYU Press, 1999), which details the ways in which the arts funding crisis of the '80s and early '90s drastically reshaped our culture. With essays by Lucy Lippard, Andrea Fraiser, Lewis Hyde and others, it chronicles a major shift in the role of visual art in public life,  and examines how that shift has altered our understanding of censorship, democracy and indeed all of pop culture.</p><p>During that pivotal era, Yenawine was director of education at New York's Museum of<br />
Modern Art (MoMA) and one of the most powerful champions of controversial art that<br />
few were willing to embrace. As head of the nonprofit Visual AIDS, he helped launch<br />
both the now-ubiquitous red ribbon project and "A Day Without Art" (which is still observed by most art institutions each Dec.1).  During the censorship/funding crisis of 1989 and '90, Yenawine testified on behalf of the NEA before the House of Representatives, and later was an expert witness for the artist David Wojnarowicz when he <a target="new" href="http://www.csulb.edu/~jvancamp/doc6.html">sued</a> the American Family Association for wrongfully representing his work as porn.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/25/artmatters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/25/artmatters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spanking the theory</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/03/26/26feature/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/03/26/26feature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/it/1999/03/26/26feature</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the study of the autoerotic more than just mental masturbation?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">W</font>hat do Pee Wee Herman, George Michael and hermeneutic discourse have in<br />
common?</p><p>If you ask a member of the burgeoning field of masturbation theory, the<br />
answer may be: absolutely everything.  Some of academia's finest scholars<br />
these days are making serious work out of the study of -- well, diddling<br />
oneself.</p><p>This brave new academic frontier opened 10 years ago at the annual<br />
conference of the Modern Language Association with a panel  called "The<br />
Muse of Masturbation." There Eve Sedgwick, who has since become the queen of queer theory, delivered her notorious paper, "Jane Austen and the Masturbating Girl." Regarded as proof that the humanities had at last decayed beyond repair, the MLA panel caused an angry ruckus both inside and outside the ivory tower. Every solo-love scholar I surveyed had stories about personal attacks at departmental events, dissertation advisors who wouldn't say the M-word and balking publishers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/03/26/26feature/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/03/26/26feature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

