David Teather

Ohio’s referendum on welfare

For the 93,000 people in the state living without unemployment benefits, God and guns can't compete with economic issues.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Theressia Gresham’s unemployment checks stopped arriving two months ago. Gresham, who lives in Cleveland, lost her job as a forklift driver at the beginning of the year and has been unable to find work since. The U.S. government pays just 26 weeks of benefits before cutting workers loose to fend for themselves. The Bush administration, convinced that the economy is on the rebound, recently ended a program extending the payments a further 13 weeks. She can’t afford to be ill because she has no healthcare insurance, although she has developed high blood pressure and diabetes since being unemployed.

Gresham, 42, who has worked all her life, now spends her days at the United Labor Agency, a federally funded organization that helps people get back to work, sending out job applications, researching on the Internet and hoping. America’s flexible labor market is much admired by the International Monetary Fund and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, but the downside to the dynamism is that for those who fall on hard times life is cruel. There are 93,000 people in Ohio who are now living without unemployment benefits, and Gresham is one of them.

“I’ve exhausted everything,” she says, looking close to tears. “I have no income. Sometimes my mother loans me money, but she is an elderly woman. I can’t get the medications I need. I didn’t even know the unemployment was going to stop. My rent was due Saturday and I told my landlord I would have it by the end of the week, but I probably won’t. This is just awful.”

U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow last week told an audience in Ohio that the oft-cited jobs lost under the presidency of George W. Bush were a myth. He later had to retract the claim: Gresham and millions like her are the reality — a working class that the government and much of America would rather ignore.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, an additional 1.3 million Americans fell below the poverty line last year, taking the total to 35.9 million, around 12.5 percent of the population. The number of people without health insurance grew by 1.4 million, to 45 million. Since Bush arrived in the White House, the number below the poverty line has risen by 4.3 million, the number lacking healthcare by 5.2 million.

Cleveland, in the battleground state of Ohio, was recently judged to be the poorest big city in America by the Census Bureau, toppling Detroit. Steve Newman, who runs the United Labor Agency, says the number of people coming through the organization looking for work has tripled over the past three years. Bush, he notes, has at least increased the agency’s funding.

Built on manufacturing, Cleveland has suffered the fate of many industrial cities in the Northeast. With its grand buildings from a more prosperous era, it has the feel of one of Britain’s northern industrial cities, hollowed out by de-industrialization. The population has steadily fallen as people have headed for the new jobs in the suburbs, leaving behind a city with dwindling tax dollars and needy people. Layoffs have not been confined to manufacturing. The city has shed 700 teachers, and in east Cleveland, a lack of money has forced cuts in the numbers of police officers patroling some of Ohio’s meanest streets.

According to Ohio Policy Matters, a bipartisan think tank based in the city, any recovery from the recession that began in 2001 has passed the state by. The state has lost jobs for three consecutive years since the peak in 2000. There have been meager job gains so far this year, but the state still has 217,000 fewer employed than in March 2001 when the nationwide recession officially began, a 3.9 percent drop. At the same point after the 1991 recession, the state had posted a 1.3 percent increase. At the current rate it will take Ohio six years to reach pre-recession levels of employment.

“There has been no previous recovery with this little job gain,” says the think tank’s executive director, Amy Hanauer. “Many of the jobs that have left Ohio are not coming back.”

At the same time, wages are decreasing, partly the result of the loss of good-paying unionized factory jobs and growth in service sectors, the so-called Wal-Mart effect. The median wage last year was $13.14 an hour. Accounting for inflation, the median Ohio wage in 1979 was $13.44.

Ohio is not alone in suffering. Michigan, with its high concentration of car plants, has had an even tougher time, while neighboring Pennsylvania has also seen its manufacturing base affected by the double whammy of weak demand and competition from China. Anger over what is seen as Beijing’s illegal manipulation of its currency is palpable. John Kerry’s proposal to review all trade agreements within his first 120 days in office is popular in Ohio, not least because government figures show that between 1995 and 2004 52,265 jobs were lost in the state as the result of international trade. In truth, however, the loss of jobs in manufacturing is not new. Estimates suggest that 40 percent of the job losses have been the result of higher productivity, but even so the past four years have been especially tough. Manufacturing employment in the U.S. has been cut from 17 million to 14 million, and those companies that have survived have had to become leaner and — in many cases — meaner.

Todd Weddell is president of a steelworkers’ local union in Niles, 60 miles southeast of Cleveland. He and his 360 members have been locked out for a year after refusing to accept a 15 percent cut in their compensation package. Their employer, RMI Titanium, said it needed to save $3.5 million in its wage bill. “The whole situation is totally grim,” Weddell says.

Both Kerry and John Edwards have been on the picket line at Niles in one of their many visits during this knife-edged contest, but some of the steelworkers are now looking for jobs that are likely to pay around half as much as the $16 an hour they were previously getting. If Kerry won, Weddell said, there would at least “be someone in the White House who cared about working people in America.”

Disappointment with Bush is not confined to organized labor. Steve Schler, president of Pro-Mold, which makes plastic moulds in Akron and has sales of $1.6 million, says the downturn since the boom of the late ’90s “has been the worst that I have experienced. Prior to that I thought the early 1980s was the worst.

“We have felt competition from the Far East — China, Taiwan, Korea. How do we compete? I haven’t got a clue.”

The other significant issue facing ProMold, also facing its workers, is healthcare. Premiums are getting ever more expensive. In 2002, ProMold’s premiums rose by 13 percent. Last year, the cost was 17 percent higher; and this year, 18 percent higher. The result: It has scaled back coverage and has made workers pay a higher portion of the costs.

Ed Herman, the Republican candidate for Ohio’s 10th district, including much of Cleveland, says Bush’s ideas for tackling big structural problems such as Social Security and healthcare recognize that the world has moved on from the days of the industrial plants of the ’30s and that a more individual approach is required. “The Democrats’ old tactic is class warfare, and they do it effectively. It is a myth perpetuated that Republicans want to destroy the welfare system. That is not the case. The services are being expanded, not shrunk, and as that awareness spreads more people will consider themselves Republican.”

Zack Schiller, of Ohio Policy Matters, disagrees. While the president has directed tax cuts toward the wealthy and large corporations, the working class is feeling threatened, he says. “Many welfare programs are under attack. Medicaid will probably be cut back; they have lowered the threshold on subsidized child care; they are trying to reduce housing subsidies. To an extent this election is a referendum on the welfare state.”

An outsider might have difficulty understanding why Ohio is even a swing state. But the Bush administration has been effective in directing attention away from the economy and making it instead about homeland security and social issues such as abortion and gay marriage. The president is more popular in the rural south of the state, but even in Cleveland, union organizers say 30 percent of their members vote Republican.

John Ryan, who runs the local chapter of the AFL-CIO, says that many of his blue-collar members are Republican. “We have devout Catholics or Christian right who have strong views on abortion or gun owners who want to own a bazooka.” In the end, though, he believes that the mass registration campaign organized by the Democrats will win the state for Kerry. “God and guns can’t compete.”

Halliburton’s problematic Cheney connection

Hoping to escape the election spotlight, the vice president's old firm may shed its KBR division, the one doing billions of dollars of work in Iraq.

  • more
    • All Share Services

It must have seemed like a terrific stroke of luck: Dick Cheney, the man who for the past five years had been the chief executive of Halliburton, became the vice president in 2000. The oil services and engineering company was given a direct line to the White House. But Halliburton’s relationship with the Bush administration is beginning to prove more problematic than it is worth.

The company admitted 12 days ago that it was considering selling Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR), the division carrying out billions of dollars’ worth of work for the U.S. government in Iraq, in a desperate attempt to get out of the spotlight. It is considering a sale, a spinoff or a separate listing for the business on the stock exchange. The company’s shares have fallen from $50 when Cheney first took office in the White House to the low $30s.

Halliburton’s business with the federal government has grown considerably since the current administration took office. According to the New York Times, the business went from being the 22nd biggest military contractor in 2000 to the seventh largest in 2003. Prior to the invasion of Iraq, without being asked to tender, Halliburton was handed a contract worth up to $7 billion to repair the nation’s oil fields. It was also given a contract to provide logistical support to U.S. troops, handling everything from food to transport and laundry services. That deal, awarded under an existing long-term contract to provide emergency services, was worth a potential $13 billion.

When the first secretive contract came to light, shortly after the March 2003 invasion, Democrats rounded on the company, arguing that it was evidence of an old-boy network in the White House. Cheney, who walked away from Halliburton with a $36 million package, continued to receive deferred income from the firm.

The oil fields contract was eventually put out to tender, with KBR retaining part of the business. The higher profile of Halliburton has ensured that the company has remained on the front pages throughout a series of controversies that might otherwise have gone unreported. This year the firm agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle allegations that it failed to disclose a key accounting change in 1998 that allowed it to inflate profits and meet Wall Street targets while Cheney was still in charge. The accounting change, concerning the booking of disputed cost overruns on projects, allowed it to increase its profits by more than $200 million. A class action lawsuit brought on behalf of shareholders has accused the firm of systemic accounting fraud — allegations the company denies.

Investigations are still underway into claims that a consortium KBR now leads paid bribes to Nigerian officials to secure a contract to build a natural gas plant. The company has admitted uncovering discussions of bribes, though it has no evidence they were actually paid. A Treasury Department inquiry has also been reopened into dealings the company may have had with Iran. Military officials, meanwhile, have accused KBR of routinely overcharging for work carried out as part of its logistics contract in Iraq and have threatened to withhold payment on 15 percent of bills.

A Pentagon auditors’ report said the company had failed to account for at least $1.8 billion worth of work done. In a little-covered development, the Pentagon’s Defense Contract Management Agency said last month that the company’s billing methods were adequate, but that has had no effect on the other investigations and audits still pending.

The Pentagon is now considering breaking the contract up into six pieces and inviting new tenders. Tired of the onslaught of invective, Halliburton has said it is not certain if it will bid for any of the smaller pieces. Another reason for wanting to quit Iraq is that 45 of the company’s workers have died there.

In a meeting with investors in Houston toward the end of September, Halliburton’s chief executive, David Lesar, said the company had become the target of a “vicious campaign” of political attacks ahead of the presidential election. The company’s workers, he added, “don’t deserve to have their jobs threatened for political gain.”

As the presidential election has heated up, so has the temperature surrounding Halliburton. The company has become a useful piece of shorthand for the newly aggressive Democratic nominee, John Kerry. He told an audience in Albuquerque, N.M., on a campaign trip last month: “Dick Cheney’s old company, Halliburton, has profited from the mess in Iraq at the expense of American troops and taxpayers. While Halliburton has been engaging in massive overcharging and wasteful practices under this no-bid contract, Dick Cheney has continued to receive compensation from his former company.”

In last week’s presidential debate, the Democratic nominee assailed Halliburton again on national television. He said the administration had deliberately limited overseas participation in Iraqi reconstruction to save the “spoils of war” for the company.

Cheney, it turns out, may have been of little real help to Halliburton at all: KBR filed for bankruptcy earlier this year, weighed down by asbestos litigation it inherited from an acquisition the vice president made while he was still running the firm.

Continue Reading Close

Days of plunder

Conrad Black and other former Hollinger International executives are accused of skimming more than $400 million from the company.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Conrad Black plundered his former company, Hollinger International, the then owner of the Daily Telegraph, on a vast scale, according to a 500-page report published Tuesday. The document, the result of a yearlong internal investigation, embellishes an earlier $1.25 billion lawsuit against Lord Black and other former executives of the company, accusing them of extraordinary greed.

According to the latest report, Lord Black charged the company almost $43,000 for a birthday party he threw for his wife, Barbara Amiel, at New York’s La Grenouille restaurant. Celebrity guests, including Oscar de la Renta, Barbara Walters and Ron Perelman, enjoyed beluga caviar and lobster. The couple also claimed as expenses $2,463 for Lady Black’s handbags, $3,530 for silverware for the Blacks’ corporate jet and $24,950 for “summer drinks.”

Publication of the long-awaited report could accelerate parallel investigations by U.S. criminal and financial authorities.

Lord Black and a small coterie, including the former deputy chairman of the company, David Radler, have been accused of skimming more than $400 million from the business in the past seven years. The lawsuit, including damages, is for three times that amount. They have been accused of taking excessive compensation and unapproved bonuses, fees and loans, and selling themselves assets from the company at bargain prices, as well as the headline-grabbing personal expenses.

“Black and Radler made it their business to line their pockets at the expense of Hollinger almost every day, in almost every way they could devise,” the internal report says. It claims that Lord Black set in place a system “to plunder Hollinger on a vast scale”; that “abusive and unethical practices had become so deeply ingrained in the corporate culture they became commonplace”; and that Lord Black had a “parasitic” relationship with the business.

The report also singles out a former U.S. assistant secretary of defense, Richard Perle, who sat on the Hollinger International board, for particular criticism. It hints that the company may launch a separate legal claim against him to claim back money he earned as a director. Perle is accused of a “head-in-the-sand” mentality, rubber-stamping Lord Black’s actions while being awarded a $3 million bonus.

Members of the company’s audit committee, who signed off on many of the millions of dollars in fees collected by Lord Black, also came in for criticism. Other high-profile directors, including former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, emerged with their reputations intact.

The report is also strongly critical of the outside auditor, KPMG. It claims the accounting firm initially resisted efforts by the investigators, an allegation denied by KPMG. Hollinger International had no comment on whether further lawsuits would be filed. A spokesman for KPMG said yesterday: “We believe that we cooperated fully with the investigation throughout its entirety.”

Hollinger International did suggest, however, that the size of the claim already filed that names Lord Black could go higher still as the company begins the discovery process and gains access to documents held by the fallen tycoon.

Lord Black, who was ousted from the company in January, has vehemently denied any wrongdoing. He has launched a defamation suit against the company alleging that it attempted to turn him into a “loathsome laughingstock.” A statement from Lord Black’s privately held Ravelston Group said the report was “recycling the same exaggerated claims laced with outright lies” and said the accused would be exonerated in court.

The first mutterings of financial scandal at Hollinger International were heard last summer when a shareholder complained of “noncompete” bonuses paid to Lord Black and other executives when the company sold some of its assets. That set in motion one of the ugliest internecine battles seen, even in the newspaper business.

Hollinger engaged Richard Breeden, a former head of the U.S. financial watchdog the Securities and Exchange Commission, to investigate. Initial findings last November suggested that at least $32 million had been misappropriated, a figure that grew as the investigation continued. The committee led by Breeden interviewed more than 60 witnesses and reviewed nearly 750,000 pages of documents in the course of the investigation.

Continue Reading Close

Page 2 of 2 in David Teather