<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Dawn MacKeen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/dawn_mackeen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bad blood in Egypt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/02/hep_c_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/02/hep_c_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2003 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egyptian Protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/06/02/hep_c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In one of the great medical tragedies in modern history, well-meaning Egyptian authorities are believed to have infected millions of people with  hepatitis C.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swaddled between two arms of the river Nile, the delta is a place where everything seems to grow. Sunflowers line roads; shallots, bulbs as big as fists, sprout from the soil. Miles and miles of canals feed thick blankets of green. </p><p>Only a few hours north of Cairo, El Tod sits off a road that shifts from dust and sand to lush patches of vegetation. Camels stand tied to posts near produce carts and butcher shops where suspended animal carcasses hang outside like potted plants. News in this village is still passed from neighbor to neighbor -- and the people in each story are usually known to all. </p><p>"Are you looking for the El Sayeed family?" asks a man walking beside my car, which has slowed to a crawl. He leads me down a garbage-strewn alleyway, past kids playing, to the El Sayeeds' modest apartment. A steady wail signals sundown -- a time to pray. </p><p>On this particular evening, most of the El Sayeed family is crowded into one room waiting for me. Hamdy, the father, is present only in a framed picture on the wall. The 50-year-old man lies in a hospital bed on the outskirts of Cairo. His neighbors know why he isn't at home. They also know why Hamdy's cousin doesn't show up at his clothing store on some days -- probably feeling too weak -- and why yet another cousin, Hamed Zayed, stayed in El Tod instead of moving to Saudi Arabia as he had planned. The reason? Zayed did not pass the blood test required to work in Saudi Arabia. Like those of many others in town, his came back positive. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/06/02/hep_c_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/02/hep_c_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George&#8217;s noxious revision</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/15/emissions_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/15/emissions_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/03/15/emissions</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bush's blatant flip-flip on carbon dioxide pollution has even some GOP stalwarts holding their noses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Bush's sudden reversal of a pledge to limit carbon dioxide emissions by power plants ignited a firestorm of criticism Wednesday from Democrats, moderate Republicans, environmentalists and international leaders. </p><p> But the move was a big hit with conservatives and energy industry supporters, who had declared war against efforts to restrict the emissions, which are believed to contribute to global warming. </p><p> "The reversal seems to suggest that the uproar that this policy caused on the right was greater than Bush had anticipated," says Jerry Taylor, director of natural resources and environmental studies at the conservative Cato Institute. "But there's not likely to be much of a political cost. The average American probably didn't even know that Bush had made the promise to unilaterally reduce greenhouse gas emissions." </p><p> Bush's decision was widely described as the work of energy industry partisans in his administration, including Vice President Dick Cheney and Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham. It represented a setback for more moderate officials, including Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and Environmental Protection Agency chief Christine Todd Whitman, who backed the emissions limit. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/03/15/emissions_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/15/emissions_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Controversial cell research takes a hit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/09/stem_cells/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/09/stem_cells/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2001 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem cells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2001/03/09/stem_cells</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critics of the field have a heyday as the results of one study and a lawsuit fuel their fire.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The political debate over controversial cell research shifted significantly on Thursday when researchers announced that a study in which tissue from aborted fetuses was used to treat Parkinson's disease proved to have disastrous results. Only hours after the findings were released, a pro-life organization filed a lawsuit against the federal government, seeking to block federal financing of embryonic stem cell research. The timing of the two events was merely coincidental, but critics of the fledging research field used the opportunity to galvanize their position, calling for an end to all experimentation with cells derived from fetal tissue and discarded embryos. </p><p>The first blow came when long-awaited results from the Parkinson's study hit the media. The study involved 40 patients between the ages of 34 and 75 with Parkinson's. Half of them received "sham" surgery, and the other half, the transplant of cells from the "substantia nigra." After following the patients for one year, researchers found that there were devastating side effects in 15 percent of those who received the transplant. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/03/09/stem_cells/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/09/stem_cells/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europe&#8217;s livestock plague</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/03/livestock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/03/livestock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2001 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/03/03/livestock</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the British meat market faces yet another crisis, experts at home assess the risk of foot-and-mouth disease in the U.S.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the foot-and-mouth outbreak fans across England, Scotland and Northern Ireland, European officials are imposing drastic measures to keep the disease from spreading. Dublin's St. Patrick's Day parade has been canceled, as have livestock shows in Spain. British travelers arriving in Portugal and those crossing the border into the Irish Republic are required to disinfect their shoes. And poor Dolly the sheep, the international pinup model for animal cloning, has been quarantined. And this is all against a backdrop of a sky clouded with the smoke from pyres on farms, where thousands of animal carcasses are being burned. </p><p>"The economic impact of this is going to be horrendous," says Dean Cliver, professor of food safety at the University of California at Davis and a member of the FDA's transmissible spongiform encephalopathies advisory committee. "Especially superimposed on the problems they had to face in the aftermath of the mad cow thing, this is going to be a big, big blow to the economy in England." Already, 37,000 animals are being killed, and that number could rise to 67,000. But so far only 40 animals have been documented as actually having the disease. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/03/03/livestock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/03/livestock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your heart has been recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/02/body_parts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/02/body_parts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2001 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2001/03/02/body_parts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the brave new world of body-part implants, what happens when you get a lemon of a ticker?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the months leading up to Linda Baez's third open-heart surgery, she spent most of her days at home. Breathing was no longer easy for her; neither were simple tasks like climbing stairs. The 44-year-old mother of four constantly felt weak and exhausted. But, above all, recounts her attorney, she was worried. Two operations to replace her leaky heart valve had already failed, and even though her doctors were implanting a different artificial valve this time around, she knew that there was a good chance that she would not make it. </p><p>And she didn't. The Dedham, Mass., resident passed away quietly in her sleep one June night last year, just a few weeks after her operation. </p><p>At the time of her death, Baez had a personal injury lawsuit pending against the manufacturer of the valves, St. Jude Medical Inc., for all the pain and suffering she said she had endured due to having defective valves implanted in her not once, but twice. The whole reason she had the surgery in the first place was to correct her mitral valve prolapse, a heart condition she had had since she was a teenager. Her valve had deteriorated to the point where it was leaking blood back to the chamber from which it was just pumped. But her family believes all she received were more leaky valves. In fact, St. Jude had issued a recall of its product, the Silzone heart valve, in January 2000 because it had a higher incidence of leaking around the sewing cuff fabric (which is used to attach the device to the heart tissue) than its predecessor. Approximately 36,000 patients worldwide had received the product, 12,000 of them in the United States. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/03/02/body_parts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/02/body_parts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global warning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/02/warming_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/02/warming_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2001 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/03/02/warming</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Species from birds to butterflies are doing strange things, and a new report blames the behavior on  the Earth's rising temperature.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last 20 years, on average, the red-chested cardinal has made its singing debut at the Leopold Memorial Reserve in Baraboo, Wisc., on Feb. 8. This year biologists recorded its first song more than a month early. And the hepatica, a flower from the buttercup family, has pushed its blooming date up by about two and a half weeks. In fact, researchers report that more than a third of the 300 species found on this 1,400 acre piece of land are coming in early. </p><p>And the cause? They say temperature changes. </p><p>According to a report issued last week by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the strange things going on at the Leopold Reserve are not isolated. Researchers found that more than 80 percent of the 500 species studied -- including birds, amphibians, mammals, reptiles, plants, mollusks, insects and other invertebrates -- are changing in response to rising temperatures. Some birds are migrating up to three weeks earlier now; other animals are migrating outside their natural habitat, edging closer to the poles and living at higher altitudes. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/03/02/warming_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/02/warming_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just say no to DARE</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/16/dare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/16/dare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2001/02/16/dare</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America's school-based drug prevention program gives in to critics' pressure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For nearly two decades, the majority of schoolchildren in the United States have been required to memorize three little words: "Just say no." They have been taught that dabbling with drugs even once can harm you, that peer pressure to use drugs is a lurking menace to be dodged and rejected at all costs. They have written thousands of essays decrying drug use, and worn T-shirts, hats, ribbons and badges to ward off the encroaching threat of narcotics. </p><p>But the days of "Just say no" may just be over. Leaders of the nation's largest drug prevention program, Drug Abuse Resistance Education, announced on Thursday that they were changing DARE's approach, admitting that the vastly expensive program appears to be ineffective. Indeed, research has indicated that DARE may actually have contributed to greater drug use by high school students. </p><p>DARE administrators announced that the program will adopt a new strategy for school-based drug prevention, and begin testing it in 80 high schools and 176 middle schools in the fall. Around 50,000 students will be involved. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/02/16/dare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/16/dare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-choice activism is reactivated</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/09/donations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/09/donations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2001 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2001/02/09/donations</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donations to Planned Parenthood are flooding in -- in the name of President Bush.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Los Angeles Times columnist Patt Morrison told readers what she was going to do for George W. Bush on Presidents Day -- give a gift in his name to Planned Parenthood -- she could not have foreseen what would happen next. An e-mail detailing her idea was unleashed upon e-mail in boxes everywhere and then forwarded a zillion times, bringing Planned Parenthood its largest surge in contributions in recent history: more than $300,000 for far. And the special day is still 10 days away. </p><p>"I am very gratified," says Morrison by phone from L.A. "I think it's better than a diet, the way it is swirling around. I must say my pro-choice Republican mother is very proud of me." </p><p> Ever since the e-mail started circulating, phone lines at Planned Parenthood chapters around the country have been ringing off the hook; mail has been coming in by the boxload, and interest has been so high that the organization has set up a <a target="new" href="http://member.plannedparenthood.org/site/PageServer?pagename=donating">Web site</a> to make it easier to donate. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/02/09/donations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/09/donations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prof. Al&#8217;s shaky debut</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/07/gore_67/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/07/gore_67/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2001 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/02/07/gore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his first day teaching at Columbia, the former vice president starts out nervous -- but relaxes enough to critique the media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tuesday was <a href="/directory/topics/al_gore/">Al Gore's</a> first day as a professor, and according to some of his students, it seemed like it. The graduate journalism students at Columbia University say he seemed nervous and not quite sure what to do with himself, and repeatedly asked them to bear with him since he was new to teaching. "It took him a long time to relax," said Marguerite Reardon, a 27-year-old grad student. "I used to be a teacher so I could feel for him." Gore's daughter <a href="/politics/feature/2000/09/14/karenna/index.html">Karenna</a> reportedly sat in the back of class to offer moral support. </p><p>Columbia is one of four teaching stints Gore will do over the next year, along with the University of California at Los Angeles, Middle Tennessee State University and Fisk University. </p><p>Exactly what the former vice president said during his 90-minute class, called "Covering National Affairs in the Information Age," is unknown, since the media were not allowed into his seminar and students were forbidden to divulge the content of his lecture. When some reporters loudly complained to Gore about the lack of access as he entered and exited the class, he responded, "It's the school's policy," before walking past the secret service agents guarding the entrance to the J-school. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/02/07/gore_67/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/07/gore_67/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t try this at home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/02/kid_violence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/02/kid_violence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2001/02/02/kid_violence</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should kids be held responsible when their reenactment of TV shows ends in catastrophe?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Fort Lauderdale, Fla., a 13-year-old boy is convicted of murdering a 6-year-old; he says he was imitating his heroes in professional wrestling when he body-slammed and kicked the 48-pound girl to death. The next day in Torrington, Conn., a 14-year-old reportedly poured gasoline on his friend and set him on fire. The kids say they were re-creating a stunt featured on a popular MTV show called "Jackass." The unscathed teen, who inflicted second- and third-degree burns on his friend's hands and legs, was arrested and charged with reckless endangerment. </p><p>The Florida boy's attorney believes the World Wrestling Federation (WWF) is responsible for the girl's death; the father of burn victim Jason Lind blames MTV. And while Lind was in the hospital, his dad appealed for support to Washington's most vociferous critic of Hollywood, <a href="/directory/topics/joseph_lieberman/">Sen. Joe Lieberman,</a> D-Conn., and the war on violence in the media was declared once again. </p><p> "There are some things that are so potentially dangerous and inciting, particularly to vulnerable children, that they simply should not be put on TV, and this is clearly one that crosses that line," said Lieberman in a <a target="new" href="http://lieberman.senate.gov/~lieberman/press/01/01/2001130610.html">press release</a> that placed blame on purveyors of rough-and-tumble programming. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/02/02/kid_violence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/02/kid_violence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overwhelming evidence of global warming</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/26/global_warming_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/26/global_warming_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/01/26/global_warming</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts hope a startling new report will be enough to persuade President Bush to take action.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After this week's release of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's <a target="new" href="http://www.ipcc.ch/">report</a> on <a href="/directory/topics/global_warming/index.html">global warming</a> -- the strongest scientific evidence ever linking climate change to man's activities -- environmentalists and scientists say the time has come for President Bush to come up with a policy to address this slow-moving ecological crisis. </p><p>The study predicts that the Earth's temperature could increase up to 10.4 degrees Fahrenheit over the next century. In fact, it says we just exited the warmest decade in the last 140 years. </p><p>While there's been little doubt that the climate is indeed warming -- glaciers are retreating, sea levels are rising, precipitation is changing -- there have been some high-profile skeptics, Bush included. They question the science linking this general warming trend to things that humans do, such as burning fossil fuel, which releases carbon dioxide. The increase of carbon dioxide and methane, another greenhouse gas, is believed to enhance the "greenhouse effect" that traps heat in Earth's atmosphere that otherwise would be released. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/01/26/global_warming_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/26/global_warming_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disaster in the Gal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/24/galapagos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/24/galapagos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/01/24/galapagos</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may take years to measure the ecological destruction caused by the oil spill near Darwin's outdoor laboratory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As fuel from a grounded ship washes up on the shores of the Gal&#225;pagos Islands -- where <a href="/directory/topics/charles_darwin/">Charles Darwin</a> developed his theory of evolution in the 19th century -- environmentalists are criticizing the Ecuadorean government's response, which they believe has been too slow. </p><p>So far, the toll has been limited: One pelican is dead and four sea lions injured, their prognosis uncertain. But environmentalists say we may never know just what species perished or became extinct because of the accident, since the archipelago is home to so many animals, many of which haven't even been documented yet. </p><p>The accident occurred when the Ecuadorean-registered ship ran aground on Jan. 16. By late Friday, diesel and bunker fuel began to leak from the Jessica, polluting the sea with an estimated 170,000 gallons. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/01/24/galapagos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/24/galapagos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s causing early puberty?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/19/estrogens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/19/estrogens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2001/01/19/estrogens</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New findings point to environmental estrogens.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one could taste the additive in their hamburgers or milkshakes. They couldn't see it or smell it. And never in their worst nightmares could they guess what was lurking in their meat and dairy products. The year was 1973, the place Michigan. The contaminant was a fire retardant, laced with polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) that got accidentally mixed into cattle feed instead of a nutritional supplement. Roughly 4,000 people were exposed. </p><p>Decades after one of the largest food contamination incidents in American history, the health effects are still not known. But according to a new study, one of the scariest ramifications of the poisoning has been for girls who were exposed in utero and through breastfeeding. They started menstruating at an average of 11.6 years old -- a full year earlier than others who were not as highly exposed. </p><p>This finding, the first in an ongoing study at Emory University that looks at the possible reproductive effects of the chemical exposure on women, provides one of the first clues about what happens when humans come into contact with hormone-disrupting compounds. More specifically, the study has bolstered -- with rare research on human subjects -- the belief of many researchers that environmental estrogens, including PBBs like this one, may be the culprit for what is believed to be an alarming trend of early sexual maturity. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/01/19/estrogens/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/19/estrogens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Babies for the highest bidders</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/19/adoption_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/19/adoption_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2001/01/19/adoption</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Private adoption rewards wealth, not fitness, and abuses abound.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are only 6 months old, but already the twin girls from Missouri have had at least two names each -- Kimberly and Belinda; Kiara and Keyara -- and at least as many homes. Now the infants are at the center of an international fight over who will raise them, an ugly tug of war that demonstrates what can go wrong in the private adoption business, where any person, with any type of background, can broker the placement of a child. </p><p>The Missouri twins' case is under investigation by the FBI, which is looking into whether fraud was committed by the adoption facilitator, Tina Johnson, who ran the Caring Heart adoption agency out of her San Diego home. Johnson reportedly brokered the twins' adoption to two couples, accepting $6,000 from Richard and Vickie Allen of California, and about $12,000 from Alan and Judith Kilshaw, a couple from Wales. (The couples found out about Johnson's services through her Web site, which has reportedly been since taken down.) </p><p>The babies lived with the Allens for two months, then returned to the birth mother, ostensibly for a few days to say goodbye. They were then handed over to the Kilshaws. And now the children's birth mother, Tranda Wecker, says she wants her babies back. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/01/19/adoption_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/19/adoption_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could Ashcroft roll back drug policy reform?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/17/drug_courts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/17/drug_courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/01/17/drug_courts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bush's choice for attorney general might halt efforts to emphasize treatment over incarceration, opponents fear.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pending confirmation of <a href="/directory/topics/john_ashcroft/">John Ashcroft</a> as the Bush administration's attorney general is worrying to those on the front lines of the battle against drug addiction. Advocates of programs like drug courts, which emphasize treatment rather than incarceration for drug offenses, are reviewing past statements by the former Missouri senator, who has often taken a hard line on drug policy. His past comments likening treatment programs to people who aid a drug habit are disturbing to leaders in the drug court movement, who fear that if Ashcroft is confirmed, the very existence of their nascent programs could be threatened. </p><p>Here are a couple of examples of statements Ashcroft has made about drug policy: </p><p>
<li>"A government which takes the resources that we would devote toward the interdiction of drugs and converts them to treatment resources ... and also implements a clean-needle program is a government that accommodates us at our lowest and least." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/01/17/drug_courts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/17/drug_courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The medical privacy debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/21/medical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/21/medical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2000 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/12/21/medical</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do Clinton's new guidelines go far enough?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is little doubt that the new privacy regulations issued by President Clinton on Wednesday go a long way toward protecting patients from the prospect of third parties getting hold of their medical records. The new rules require most healthcare providers and insurance companies to get patients' written consent before sharing medical information -- either orally or written -- with others. </p><p>"The administration is to be congratulated," says ACLU associate director Barry Steinhardt. "It is a significant step forward." A significant one, indeed, but one that does not go far enough, say critics. </p><p>Privacy advocates -- and even the American Medical Association -- have long pressured Clinton to limit the "unfettered" access to private medical records that law enforcement officers enjoy in many parts of the country. And many were disappointed that the president didn't issue more stringent regulations for government access in the new guidelines. Specifically, privacy advocates wanted Clinton to require law enforcement officials and government investigators to obtain the highest level of proof -- a court order -- before receiving the documents. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/21/medical/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/21/medical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First you dial, then you crash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/07/cell_phones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/07/cell_phones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2000 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/health/2000/12/07/cell_phones</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With cellphone use among drivers skyrocketing, can accidents be far behind?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken Berger can't move his car. Although his sleek new silver 2001 Corvette can rev from zero to 60 in under five seconds, right now he's wedged in between dozens of vehicles on the freeway and can go nowhere. It's 4:30 p.m. in Oakland, Calif., on a November afternoon, and Berger is getting antsy that he'll miss his 5 o'clock meeting. </p><p>So what's a Silicon Valley consultant to the wireless industry to do? </p><p>Just this: He reaches into his bag, fires up his new Sony laptop, connects it to his Ricochet wireless modem, logs onto www.mapquest.com and locates an alternative route using side streets. And he makes his meeting. Barely. </p><p>For the 33-year-old entrepreneur, who spends hours each week traveling between his home office in San Francisco and meetings throughout the Bay Area, his car has become a second workplace. And when in the driver's seat, he brings with him all of the accoutrements of the modern high-tech command center -- a Palm Pilot, wireless modem, computer and, of course, his gleaming new cellphone, the Nokia 8290. </p><p>"It used to be so frustrating when you were stuck in traffic because you were throwing time away," says Berger, who schedules conference calls for times when he knows he'll be on the road. "Now, even though traffic has gotten worse, you can reclaim part of that time by being productive." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/07/cell_phones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/07/cell_phones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. clash on global warming</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/17/emissions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/17/emissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/11/17/emissions</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Department of Energy report undermines the position of U.S. negotiators at a U.N. conference on reducing greenhouse gases.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past few days, people attending a <a href="/directory/topics/united_nations/">United Nations</a> conference on <a href="/health/feature/2000/11/03/ozone/index.html">global warming</a> in the Hague have been approaching scientist Marilyn Brown. They want her to explain one thing: the curious timing of her pivotal new Department of Energy report, which was released on Wednesday. </p><p>"People are saying, 'Why release it now in the midst of negotiations?" says Brown, who prepared the study for the Department of Energy and is speaking by phone from the Hague. "They want to know why we didn't release it before." </p><p>The question of timing is an important one since Brown's study, the most recent from the United States government related to global warming, states emphatically that the country can be doing a hell of a lot more to reduce industrial emissions of carbon-based gases. According to the report, reduction goals can be accomplished by offering American companies financial incentives to reduce their emission levels, funneling more money to researching new technologies and pursuing other strategies to promote efficient energy consumption. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/11/17/emissions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/17/emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life under the hole in the sky</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/03/ozone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/03/ozone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/11/03/ozone</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the people of southern Chile, ozone depletion isn't a political issue -- it's a nightmarish reality. A report from the globe's ecological future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below an expansive sky that stretches on forever, hundreds of 4-year-olds tucked into puffy winter coats hold hands and file eagerly into an elementary school auditorium. Though it is barely 45 degrees outside, the preschoolers are here to learn about the dangers of the sun. </p><p>Paul the Penguin, a 7-foot-tall mascot, appears onstage accompanied by two friends in beach clothes. They warn him that the sun will turn his skin red but that if he douses himself in Eucerin sunblock, he can play outdoors as long as he likes. After the show, the preschoolers line up once again, giggling and squealing, to receive free trial-sized bottles of Eucerin, courtesy of the cosmetic company that makes it. As they grab their gifts and file out, they look like giggling children anywhere -- even though they're not. </p><p>The festive setting, complete with beach balls sporting Eucerin's name in big black letters, belies the grim reason they have all gathered. Like the "duck-and-cover" classroom exercises during the Cuban missile crisis, and Los Angeles' smog alerts in the 1980s, which cautioned students not to go outside when pollution levels were high, today's presentation is teaching a generation of kids in the southern tip of Chile how to accept the unacceptable -- how to survive under the expanding ozone hole the rest of the world has created. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/11/03/ozone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/03/ozone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet sex infections</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/16/internet_sex_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/16/internet_sex_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/06/16/internet_sex</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you had anal sex with a partner you met online? The inquiring minds at the Centers for Disease Control want to know.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She liked anthropology. So did he. He said he was almost "obsessive" about hiking. She loved long walks. For nine months, they exchanged e-mails every day, sent photos and gifts and talked on the phone. Then she bought a ticket from Colorado to Alaska to spend six days with Lance, the man she met online. </p><p>It was understood that, unless one of them was a beast, they would have sex. And they did, the night she arrived, after loosening up with Mexican food and Negro Modelos. The sex was good. So good they spent much of her six-day visit indoors. </p><p>Health officials may already know about this tryst. They have been lurking in chat rooms lately. It seems that meeting on the Internet and then taking it to the bedroom -- or wherever you like it -- has become a public health issue. Since August, when a syphilis outbreak was traced to an AOL chat room, there has been an astonishing revelation: You, too, can get a sexually transmitted disease if you have sex with someone you happen to meet online! </p><p>Cybercourtships and the resulting sexual entanglements are a budding field for researchers studying the spread of STDs. The feds have funded a study to understand the habits of horny Web users. Investigators in San Francisco have quizzed people coming to an STD clinic, and discovered that 17 percent have met a sex partner online in the last year. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/16/internet_sex_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/16/internet_sex_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

