Duncan Campbell

Afghanistan’s rocky road to freedom

Nearly three years after Operation Enduring Freedom was launched, not much of the operation endures and many basic freedoms -- from insecurity, from fear, from poverty -- remain elusive.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Earlier this month, it was announced that the elections in Afghanistan were to be delayed for a second time, with the country now supposedly choosing a president in October and a new parliament next spring. The announcement made few waves. Afghanistan is the day before yesterday’s story. Nearly three years after Operation Enduring Freedom was launched to remove the Taliban regime and bring liberty and prosperity to one of the world’s most impoverished countries, not much of the operation endures and many basic freedoms — from insecurity, from fear, from poverty — remain elusive.

The timing of the election, one month before George Bush goes to the polls himself, has as much to do with American as Afghan politics. With Iraq in turmoil, a newly elected Afghan president will be offered as proof that at least some of the administration’s foreign policy objectives have been met.

Many Afghans, particularly in Kabul, clearly welcomed the removal of the Taliban. But the one thing that the Taliban did provide was security, so that people could travel in the countryside without fear of ambush and so that the plunder, rape and corruption of the warlord era that preceded them became largely contained.

Last week, President Hamid Karzai told the New York Times that the threat from the Taliban was “exaggerated” and that the real danger to the future of Afghanistan lay with the warlords and their militias. Part of the reconstruction process after the war was meant to be a disarmament of the militias, but so far only around 10,000 out of 60,000 have responded to the incentive of new jobs and handed in their weapons.

Not a few Afghans surveying the chaotic aftermath of war have ruefully, if not seriously, suggested that the Taliban should be invited back in a limited capacity to run security. Every day come reports of fresh attacks on anyone associated with the election process or the west, along with a steady drizzle of ambushes, assassinations, rocket attacks and explosions. Only yesterday there was a fatal clash between US forces and the Taliban in Zabul.

As it happens, the announcement of the election date comes as an independent research body has published a report on what it sees as the failure of the security policy in Afghanistan, accusing the international community of serious neglect. The report, by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU), points out that, compared with countries where the international community has intervened militarily, Afghanistan has been badly let down.

Nato has just decided to increase its forces there from 6,500 to 8,700, which the report claims will be inadequate. “Shamefully, Afghanistan has the lowest international troop to population ratio of any recent intervention,” asserts Col Philip Wilkinson, who co-authored the paper with Michael Bhatia and Kevin Lanigan. The report says that Afghanistan now has one member of the military to 1,115 members of the population, compared to one per 50 at an equivalent period in Kosovo, one per 111 in East Timor, one per 161 in Iraq and one per 375 in Haiti.

“Nato’s continued inability to provide significant forces will only further embolden President Karzai’s opponents — whether warlords, poppy-growers or terrorists,” the report concludes, arguing that “the Taliban are far from defeated, poppy production has soared, and regional warlords are still brazen in their abuse of citizens and in their dealings with the central government.” Andrew Wilder, director of AREU, which is based in Kabul and receives funding from the EU, the UN, Sweden and Switzerland, reckons that as the situation stands it is still not possible to hold fair and safe elections.

Aid agencies have also expressed their concerns. “Afghanistan continues to be sidelined as international attention and resources remain focused on Iraq,” says Barbara Stapleton, spokeswoman for the Agency Coordinating Body for Afghan Relief in Kabul. She says that many NGOs have called for an increase in security to help the country stabilise itself. Many others in the aid community have expressed concern that the election is being hurried through without enough attention paid to the safety of voters and registration teams.

In his novel about the Taliban period, The Swallows of Kabul, Mohammed Moulessehoul, under his nom de plume of Yasmina Khadra, writes: “The Afghan countryside is nothing but battlefields, expanses of sand and cemeteries … everything appears charred, fossilised, blasted by some unspeakable spell.”

For a moment, in the wake of the war, it looked as if the spell might be broken and the country would be associated with something other than battlefields and cemeteries. Then the caravan moved on to Iraq and the warlords returned to their old pursuits. Afghanistan deserves the world’s full attention — and its help — once more.

Will women change Afghanistan?

More than two million women have registered to vote in Afghanistan's forthcoming elections  despite repeated threats and violence from the Taliban.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Last week , in the eastern province of Nangarhar, an Afghan woman was killed when the car she was travelling in hit a landmine. She had been working to register voters for Afghanistan’s presidential elections, scheduled for October 9. Two weeks earlier, just south of Jalalabad, a bomb exploded on a bus carrying Afghan women working as voter registration officials, killing three of them. A Taliban spokesman claimed responsibility, saying it was a warning not to take part in the elections.

There is still cultural unease in some areas of Afghanistan about the enfranchisement of women. Men and women register separately to vote, and women are registered by other women. Following the explosion near Jalalabad, the work of all women registration officials in the eastern and southern provinces was suspended, effectively halting, albeit temporarily, the electoral process for women. But in spite of repeated warnings from the Taliban that women should neither register nor stand for office, 2.1 million women have now registered to vote, according to the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, the body overseeing the process. This means that 38% of the current electorate are women, overturning predictions that few would register.

Most of the prospective candidates have been biding their time before declaring their intention to join the race for the presidency, in which the incumbent, the US-backed Hamid Karzai, is clear favourite. However, one candidate has already made her intentions clear. Posters bearing the photograph and a brief biography of Dr Massouda Jalal can be seen around the capital: there is even one at the guardpost outside the city’s military hospital. The 41-year-old, who visits Britain this week as a guest of the Foreign Office, teaches paediatric medicine at Kabul University. Her candidacy, she says, is a challenge to the old order and to all forms of discrimination.

Sitting in the first-floor flat she shares with her husband and three young children on the outskirts of Kabul, Jalal says she believes there are a number of reasons why the country needs a change in its style of leadership. “One of the main issues we have to fight is corruption and I do not believe that the interim government has been able to deal with this,” she says. “I also believe that a woman leader would be better at bridging the gap between Afghanistan and the international community.” Her candidacy was publicly denounced at a meeting by one former mujahideen leader, Ayatollah Mohseni. “He called a woman’s candidacy for the presidency of Afghanistan illegal, but right away 200 or 300 people stood up and objected  and left in protest,” says Jalal, whose campaign is run on a shoestring.

Although violent attacks on election officials are an almost daily occurence, Jalal says she is determined not to be intimidated. “I have no security support from the government. It is not interested in my health or life. But I have felt no danger up to now. I have no armed guard and, as you can see, my door is open.”

She says men and women number equally among her supporters, and that her family is proud that she is attempting to become the country’s first female leader. Although there are still many barriers for women in Afghanistan which she would want her presidency to address, “there are some changes. Women can move around freely, at least during the day, and there are more job opportunities. But most of them still have no personal property and, if they have the courage to stand as a candidate, there is no attention paid.”

Carol Le Duc, an Englishwoman who has lived and worked in Afghanistan for the past 14 years, says that there have been significant political developments since the fall of the Taliban in 2001. If the new constitution works as intended, she says, women will make up 25% of the government after the parliamentary elections, postponed until next April following the recent violence; a quarter of seats are reserved for women. This is roughly twice the percentage in the United States, she notes.

“But civil rights for women?” she says. “Light years off.” The major problems for women remain a lack of opportunity and fear for their personal safety at home, says Le Duc. She points out that the mistreatment of women flourished under the mujahideen.

Now, she says, women who work can still be dismissed by men as “whores”. “Women say that men don’t know how to behave towards them,” says Le Duc. “Not a week goes by without a report of a gang rape by a warlord, or a woman beaten almost to death by her husband. Women are still valued for their reproductive rather than their productive role.”

However, more women have now moved into positions of authority in non-governmental organisations. They have ensured that the issue of forced and underage marriage is back on the political agenda, and it could become a key election issue. The large numbers of women who attempt suicide by burning themselves with cooking oil has highlighted the issue.

“What does the high level of self-immolation in Afghanistan mean?” asks Horia Mosadiq, a 31-year-old journalist and human rights activist. “What can be so bad that it makes you want to kill yourself? In [the province of] Herat, there were 183 cases of self-immolation last year and 26 women died.” The worst mistreatment of women remains in forced and child marriages, says Mosadiq, sometimes between very elderly men and girls as young as nine or 10. “This is not part of the Islamic principle at all,” she says. “The Holy Prophet said that a couple should be equal  in age, education and wealth. The people who carry out these marriages are not obeying Islamic rules.”

Ahmana Afzali of the Independent Human Rights Commission agrees that Islamic law has been wrongly used to justify discrimination against women. A former exile in Iran, she returned to Kabul to teach biology at the university. “We would like to see women have real equal rights, not just in theory,” she says. “The position of women has improved in the past few years but not enough. Of course, under the Taliban all of the human rights of women were ignored. But we have to change attitudes  many women still say, ‘We are women so we cannot go out.’ We have to change that.” Two other major election issues, as in Britain, will be education and health, both areas that have particular significance for women in Afghanistan. There are now incentives for families in the more conservative provincial areas to put their daughters into the educational system. The UN’s World Food Programme offers girls who go to school a monthly food supply for six people in the form of rice, cooking oil and so on.

“In our country, we have cultural restrictions  they do not like girls to attend school,” says Basir Qreshi, the programme assistant in Jalalabad. “There is a gender gap, but the outcome has been positive. Before this started in 2002 there were a million girls in school; now there are 2.5 million.” The UN’s Food for Education programme, aimed at widows, women with disabilities and returning refugees, is also using food to encourage women into the educational system. Women who take courses in literacy, embroidery, beading, tailoring and carpet-weaving will receive food supplies for themselves and their families for the duration of their courses.

Health remains another major issue, not least because women feel unable to discuss their problems even with their husband. “One woman dies every 20 minutes in Afghanistan as a result of complications in pregnancy,” says Eddie Carwardine, a spokesman of Unicef. The province of Badakhshan currently has the world’s highest maternal mortality rate: 6,500 per 100,000 women. This compares with 13 per 100,000 in the UK.

“The educated girl tends to grow up to be a healthier woman, but here you are looking at a country where 70% are illiterate,” says Carwardine. He adds that, despite stereotypical notions of Afghan manhood, most men express great appreciation for the healthcare their wives are now entitled to. “Many of the men will tell you how frightened they were [when their wives were ill during pregancy].” Imams and mullahs also encourage women to take advantage of the health programmes, he says, again defying stereotype.

Full-scale election campaigning has yet to get under way in Afghanistan, not least because of the attendant violence and fear. Clearly, the votes of more than two million women will be eagerly courted by all sides. Le Duc says that women could play a key part in the political life of the country if they are allowed to, and adds that it is a western misconception that associates the burka with submissiveness. “These are not shrinking violets, they are tough women.”

Continue Reading Close

The George Clooney of Kabul

Ex-American G.I. is focus of an investigation into freelance bounty hunters drawn to Afghanistan.

  • more
    • All Share Services

When Afghan police burst into the large suburban house in Kabul, they were not expecting to see three men strapped to the ceiling and hanging by their feet.

This was supposedly an import business, after all.

But as they released the men, and five other captives who were also in the house, officers realised they had stumbled upon a private jail where Afghan prisoners were being locked up and tortured.

Yesterday, Afghan security forces and the US military admitted they appeared to have uncovered a freelance counterterrorism mission by bounty hunters, who may have been lured to the country by the prospect of earning multimillion-dollar rewards.

At the heart of their investigation is a former American special forces soldier, Jonathan Keith “Jack” Idema, who is alleged to have run the private jail and was being questioned last night.

Mr Idema, who is said to be always heavily armed, is far from the only ex-military man to be making a living in Kabul, which has an atmosphere redolent of The Third Man, Graham Greene’s thriller about postwar Vienna.

Many of the private security guards attached to embassies and commercial companies have military histories, either real or imagined. Typically, they can be seen in dark glasses and camouflage gear, sub-machine guns slung over their shoulders as they ride through the city. They are often to be seen at the Mustafa hotel, one of the few bars that sell alcohol to ex-pats, who gather for the hotel’s popular roof-top barbecues.

Mr Idema, it emerged yesterday, has a colourful past. A volatile former Green Beret with a criminal record in the US, he describes himself as a security adviser. He also claims that he is the person on whom George Clooney’s part in the Hollywood film The Peacemaker was based.

While there has been no official explanation of what sort of operation he was running, there are large rewards on offer for the capture of al-Qaida members in Afghanistan, which has led to a boom in the private security business.

The biggest reward of all  $25m  remains on offer for information leading to the capture of Osama bin Laden.

Mr Idema knows all about him, having collaborated with Robin Moore, the author of the book The Hunt for Bin Laden, a gung-ho account, published last year, of the so-far unsuccessful pursuit of the al-Qaida leader.

Officials revealed that when Mr Idema and two other Americans were arrested, they were all armed and dressed in US military-style uniforms.

An Afghan official told the Associated Press that the prisoners were “hanging upside down” in the house in the quiet suburb of Kart-i-Parwen, and had been beaten.

The American military appear to have suspected that Mr Idema was involved in something nefarious. Since last week, they have been quietly briefing journalists about him, stressing that he has no connection with the US forces.

And following the arrest, a public statement was issued by the US military saying that he had “allegedly represented himself as an American government and/or military official  The public should be aware that Idema does not represent the American government and we do not employ him.”

Mr Idema has a chequered history not untypical of some of the ex-military personnel who have been drawn to Kabul. Although the US military authorities would not confirm his record yesterday, he is said to have been a member of the special forces between 1975 and 1992.

After leaving the forces, he ran a military equipment firm in the US.

He was convicted of wire fraud and other offences in connection with that business in the 90s.

One rightwing news website in the US suggests that he was only charged after he refused to cooperate with the FBI and the CIA over information which he claimed he had about weapons-grade nuclear material being sold in Russia to foreign terrorist groups.

This information, gathered when he was in Lithuania, is the source of a legal action that Mr Idema launched against Steven Spielberg’s film company DreamWorks SKG.

In 2000, he issued a writ against DreamWorks, claiming its 1997 film The Peacemaker, which starred George Clooney and Nicole Kidman, was based on his story.

The film is about a maverick American colonel, played by Clooney, who tracks down a Russian nuclear smuggling team.

He claimed damages of $130m. The case is ongoing.

In the meantime, he had become something of a media security pundit, popping up on television programmes to comment on security matters.

During the war in Afghanistan in 2001, Mr Idema and a number of other former US military members linked up with the Northern Alliance rebel group, who were fighting the Taliban. He offered his services to the media and appeared on American television news programmes after having supposedly found al-Qaida training camp footage in Kabul.

When Fox News showed the footage, Mr Idema launched another civil action, seeking $2m damages for supposedly showing the footage without his permission.

He also threatened to punch Geraldo Rivera, the controversial Fox News commentator, who, Mr Idema claimed, had messed up the operations of the Northern Alliance by irresponsible reporting.

Mr Idema, who has a reputation in Kabul for volatility, is also the source of much internet gossip on sites used by ex-members of the US special forces, not all of whom would describe themselves as admirers.

Now Mr Idema remains in the custody of Afghanistan’s intelligence officials. In a country where the legal framework barely exists, his stay could be even longer than that of his detainees.

Continue Reading Close

Page 2 of 2 in Duncan Campbell