<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Jack Hitt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/jack_hitt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 16:08:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Primary color</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/11/south_carolina_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/11/south_carolina_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2000/feature/2000/02/11/south_carolina</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawsuit accuses the South Carolina GOP of excluding blacks from the vote.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>ith <a target="new" href="/politics2000/directory/candidates/john_mccain/index.html"> John McCain</a>  surging in South Carolina, the state's Republican Party has been desperately trying to fold up its famous big tent. Party officials admit they have a plan to keep closed nearly one-fourth of the state's polling places, some 500 of a total 1,778 ballot boxes, for the primary next Saturday. Most of them are in Democratic and black majority areas -- as it happens, where McCain's edge resides.</p><p>"In one part of South Carolina, they've practically shut down an entire county," said Rep. Todd Rutherford, a Democratic legislator from Columbia. "Williamburg County -- it just happens to be majority black."</p><p>As a result, Rutherford has filed a lawsuit, challenging the practice as a violation of the Voting Rights Act. The two sides are scheduled for a hearing before a three-judge federal panel Monday, five days before the primary Feb. 19. In the meantime, the Republicans have taken their plan before the Justice Department to get a "pre-clearance" opinion, which may pre-empt any judicial consideration.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/11/south_carolina_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/11/south_carolina_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the Starr chamber</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/17/starr_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/17/starr_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/06/17/starr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Woodward&#039;s new book shows the independent  counsel as the pervert-run-amok we all knew he was.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>M</b>y mother has never liked Ted Kennedy's politics. But throughout my childhood,<br />
she would always conclude one of her anti-Ted diatribes with some remark like<br />
"but no one deserves to lose two brothers the way he did," or "his mother Rose is<br />
a strong woman." When the American public remained unchanged in its feeling for<br />
President Clinton throughout the Starr investigation, there was a similar dynamic<br />
going on. People might be angry at the president for sinning (and sinning and<br />
sinning), but they never lost sight of the personal nature of Clinton's<br />
crimes and, I think, the brutal agony they must have visited upon Chelsea. It<br />
angered a lot of Republicans that the public wouldn't separate  the man from<br />
the office.</p><p>Probably no Republican was more enraged by this failure than <a href="/news/feature/1999/05/08/starr/index.html"> Kenneth Starr.</a> In<br />
his new book, "Shadow," Bob Woodward offers a few glimpses inside Starr's office and<br />
what one sees is not only the pervert-run-amok we all know and love, but just a<br />
generally weird guy. Starr is shown having immense "respect" for lofty<br />
institutions and statutes and protocols, but recklessly unconcerned with the tiny<br />
human scale of this scandal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/17/starr_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/17/starr_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The bitter end</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/08/starr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/08/starr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/05/08/starr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mistrial in the Steele case marks Kenneth Starr&#039;s induction into the American hall of shame.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>ndependent counsel Kenneth Starr lost his last battle on Friday when a federal judge declared a mistrial in the case of <a href="/news/1999/01/cov_13newsa.html">Julie Hiatt Steele</a>, the woman Starr indicted for changing her mind and refusing to corroborate Kathleen Willey's tale of sexual harassment by President Clinton. Steele declared victory in her grudge match with Starr. "I think it's time to celebrate,'' she told reporters outside the courtroom. "It's time to start my life again."</p><p>Starr's deputy in the case promised to seek a new trial, but such a move is unlikely. The independent counsel's office made the same threat after its prosecution of Whitewater figure <a href="/news/feature/1999/04/13/mcdougal/">Susan McDougal</a> ended in mistrial, but it never followed through. Starr may pop up again -- prosecuting Webster Hubbell, even trying to torment the Clintons after they leave office. This would not be a good idea. As Julie Hiatt Steele tries to start her life again, it's time for Ken Starr to do the same. But he'll likely have a harder time of it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/08/starr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/08/starr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>True romance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1998/09/09/cov_09newsa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1998/09/09/cov_09newsa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 1998 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1998/09/09/cov_09newsa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did President Clinton risk everything for a perky intern? Because he was in love.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">W</font>hy did President Clinton wear that necktie? I'm referring to the $100 silk Zegna<br />
in audacious gold-and-navy patterns that Monica gave him with the remark, "When<br />
I see you wearing this tie, I'll know I'm close to your heart." Clinton donned it for a<br />
gun-ban rally in the Rose Garden the very morning Monica was testifying before<br />
the grand jury. The New York Times suspected that it was "a plea for solidarity,"<br />
while Newsday thought it was a White House threat to Lewinsky "that she was<br />
being watched."</p><p>But there was something off in the timing. "Ms. Lewinsky did not learn of Mr.<br />
Clinton's choice of neckties until she turned on the television that evening," the<br />
Times noted.</p><p>Now, any two-bit G-7 knows that Clinton would have had to wear the tie the day<br />
before so that she would see it on the evening news prior to her testimony.<br />
Certainly Clinton, of all people, would have known such media fundamentals. So<br />
think like Sherlock Holmes for a minute. If it wasn't witness-tampering or a threat,<br />
then what was Clinton signaling?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1998/09/09/cov_09newsa/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1998/09/09/cov_09newsa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>True romance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1998/08/30/newsa_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1998/08/30/newsa_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 1998 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1998/08/30/newsa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did President Clinton risk everything for a perky intern? Because he was in love.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">W</font>hy did President Clinton wear that necktie? I'm referring to the $100 silk Zegna in audacious gold-and-navy patterns that Monica gave him with the remark, "When I see you wearing this tie, I'll know I'm close to your heart." Clinton donned it for a gun-ban rally in the Rose Garden the very morning Monica was testifying before the grand jury. The New York Times suspected that it was "a plea for solidarity," while Newsday thought it was a White House threat to Lewinsky "that she was being watched."</p><p>But there was something off in the timing. "Ms. Lewinsky did not learn of Mr. Clinton's choice of neckties until she turned on the television that evening," the Times noted.</p><p>Now, any two-bit G-7 knows that Clinton would have had to wear the tie the day before so that she would see it on the evening news prior to her testimony. Certainly Clinton, of all people, would have known such media fundamentals. So think like Sherlock Holmes for a minute. If it wasn't witness-tampering or a threat, then what was Clinton signaling?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1998/08/30/newsa_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1998/08/30/newsa_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

