<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Jenn Shreve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/jenn_shreve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Necessity is the mother of goulash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/28/goulash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/28/goulash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//sust/2000/11/28/goulash</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the change we earned from recycling, and with recycled ingredients, my mother somehow managed to feed us all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has the look and consistency, I imagine, of brains when they hit the pavement: red, wormy, with thick white chunks of this 'n' that thrown in for good measure. But the taste? The taste is something touching upon culinary perfection: a sublime medley of carbohydrate, grease, protein, salt and sugary sweetness. </p><p>We called it hamburger-potato goulash. These three words -- hamburger! potato! goulash! -- evoke memories of warm summer evenings clinging to my mother's legs in the kitchen as she whipped up a batch for the evening meal. When times were good, we got goulash. Goulash memories are happy memories. </p><p>A bit of background: If you've ever cracked a joke about poor white trash, the butt of your joke was me at the age of 3. My father was your standard shiftless batterer. My mother was too smart to be there but too afraid to leave. I was their straw-thin, hyperactive daughter. My brother was just a baby. We were a family of four, poor as dirt, living the low life in Lubbock, Texas. The year was 1976. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/11/28/goulash/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/28/goulash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The conversation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/28/shreve_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/28/shreve_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/sex/urge/2000/03/28/shreve</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There comes a time in every relationship when I&#039;ve got to talk about my rape.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>H</b>oney, we've known each other for a while now. I like you a lot, and I think it's safe to say you feel the same for me. There's something I want to tell you. I've been meaning to for a while, but I've been afraid of how you'll react. But it's been such a beautiful night. The stars were out, and we had such a good time at dinner. Making love to you tonight, I felt so close to you, like I could tell you anything at all. I trust you. So if you don't mind, I'll just be out with it.</p><p>I was out on a date. The guy seemed nice, but he wasn't. I won't go into details because it's too painful and not necessary, but he raped me.</p><p>I'm OK with it now. I've had some therapy. I've moved on. I don't even think about it all that often. It certainly doesn't affect us, just me, but like I said, I'm fine. I'm a survivor. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger, right? I just thought, if we're to grow close to one another, it's important for you to know this thing about me. I hope you won't think I'm needy or fucked in the head or anything like that.</p><p>Hey, are you OK? You seem distant.</p><p><font size="-3" color="#000000">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -</font></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/28/shreve_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/28/shreve_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spongeworthiness</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/15/today_sponge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/15/today_sponge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seinfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/03/15/today_sponge</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Today Sponge survives the strange saga of its five-year disappearance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>ensions are mounting in the Today Sponge discussion list hosted on <a target="new" href="http://www.birthcontrol.com">BirthControl.com</a>. "We need a date, that's all a date a simple date to let us know WHEN?WHEN? WHEN??????????" posts one participant.</p><p>"Perhaps I am not the most patient creature in the universe to date, but it seems to me that I have been awaiting the Today Sponge's return for years. I would appreciate some concrete information. Where is it?" demands another.</p><p>Others can express only gratitude: "I am so glad that [the Today Sponge] is finally coming back! I am so miserable without them! I cannot be on the Pill anymore, and I used to use these things all the time! Only went to the Pill because they got rid of the sponge! My prayers are finally answered!"</p><p>Who can blame them for being anxious? It's been five long years since the Today Sponge sat on drugstore shelves. In March 1999, the newly formed Allendale Pharmaceutical Co. announced it would bring back the sponge, possibly as soon as fall 1999.</p><p>Fall came and went, then winter. Now Allendale predicts its resurrected product will be released in Canada sometime this month, and in the United States no later than May. For fans of the contraceptive sponge it can't happen soon enough.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/15/today_sponge/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/15/today_sponge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The crime scene</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/15/oakland_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/15/oakland_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/03/15/oakland</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What good is a site that lets Oakland, Calif., residents check on neighborhood crime stats if the people in those neighborhoods aren&#039;t online?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he view from my home office in Oakland, Calif., is rather boring: a quiet street, a vacant lot, a few parked cars. Now and then a pint-sized pack of kids goes running by.  I spend more time than I care to admit staring out this window -- and until Monday, I could confidently say that nothing much happens in this neighborhood of mine.</p><p>But on Monday, while pointing and clicking away at the computer next to this window, I learned that more than a crime a day takes place around here. Some 516 crimes occurred in the vicinity between February 1999 and February 2000, including 198 cases of larceny; 95 cases of burglary; nine rapes and two attempted rapes; 59 cases of auto theft; two car-jackings; 35 armed robberies; 11 cases of child abuse; 40 assaults; seven cases of arson; 17 reports of domestic violence and one homicide.</p><p>I found these stats on <a target="new" href="http://www.oaklandnet.com/maproom/crimewatch_default.html">CrimeWatch, </a> a one-of-a-kind application on the Oakland city <a target="new" href="http://www.oaklandnet.com">Web site.</a> Basically, an interactive map, CrimeWatch lets anyone select an area of the city and find out how many crimes have been committed there over a specified period of time. Originally created for internal use by the police department and city officials, the site allows users to create maps, graphs and spreadsheets, which can then be downloaded for personal use -- or activism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/15/oakland_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/15/oakland_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Post non-traumatic stress syndrome?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/28/y2k_therapy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/28/y2k_therapy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/01/28/y2k_therapy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A "technotherapist" begins a Y2K recovery group, for those suffering the loss of millennial doom.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he millennium anxieties may be over, but the pain goes on. That's the theory, at least, behind a new Y2K recovery group starting next month in Berkeley, Calif.</p><p>"There's been a certain group of people who I'd say are feeling somewhat depressed. It's like we have all had a relationship with Y2K for one year -- or if we were working with Y2K, for three or five years -- and we're suddenly divorced on 1/1/00," says Sheryl Coryell, a licensed marriage and family counselor who co-founded the group. "There is loss involved. I'm not saying we wanted something bad to happen, but there is a relationship between you and this thing called Y2K. It artificially got cut off," she explains.</p><p>The group, which will also be led by therapist Claude DeLaubert, will meet for a minimum of six weeks and address the issues of loss and <a href="/media/col/shre/2000/01/07/y2k/index.html">disappointment,</a> as well as anger, guilt and shame experienced by those who feel betrayed by the media and retailers who capitalized on pre-New Year's hysteria.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/28/y2k_therapy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/28/y2k_therapy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When good governments go bad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/2000/01/21/government</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These pernicious moments brought to you by your elected leaders. PLUS: Sisterhood pyramid schemes, supermarket warfare and a man and his hooptie.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he alternative press exists in part to present a fiercer side of journalism, especially when it comes to unveiling the nefarious activities of our elected officials. While their constant harping on the abuses of government at times can grow tiresome and clichid as a hippie drum circle, these lefty muckrakers still serve a purpose when it comes to exposing political rot.</p><p>Last week I was reminded of this by Salon's <a href="/news/feature/2000/01/13/drugs/index.html">story</a> about how the U.S. government paid networks to slip anti-drug messages into their scripts. As much as I'd like to see an episode of "Friends" where Joey gets addicted to crack and sodomizes all his roommates, I find abhorrent the idea that our elected officials will spare no expense and violate any law or civil right in the name of wiping out drugs -- an effort that, so far, has been 100 percent ineffective.</p><p>Here are a few more pernicious moments courtesy of the U.S. government.</p><p><font size="1" color="#999999">- - - - - - - - - - - -</font></p><p>Cleveland Free Times, Jan. 19-25</p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.freetimes.com/issues/818/features-cover.php3">"Bullied"</a> by Sean Rapacki</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/government/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two! Four!  Six! Eight!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/14/hatred/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/14/hatred/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/2000/01/14/hatred</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who do we love to hate? Alternative weekly journalists share their true feelings on SUVs, cell phones, minks, celebrities and others.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b> come across many an article seething with hatred during my weekly perusal of the alternative press. And why not? There are few reading pleasures more delightful than a well-aimed, passionately argued diatribe.</p><p>As the poet Ogden Nash once said, "Any kiddies in school can love like a fool,/But hating, my boy, is an art." Indeed, to hate and hate well is a difficult task. The object of rancor must be chosen with a sharp eye for deep and complex flaws, to fuel your burning abhorrence. And one must be absolutely certain that the object of ire is indeed deserving; much scorn is misdirected, and hence wasted.</p><p><font size="1" color="#999999">- - - - - - - - - - - -</font></p><p>Salt Lake City Weekly, Jan. 6-12</p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.avenews.com/editorial/ae/cw/arts/arts_000106.cfm">"SUV Luv"</a> by Andrew Haley</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/14/hatred/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/14/hatred/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Y2blecK</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/07/y2k_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/07/y2k_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/2000/01/07/y2k</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why some people still yearn for the apocalypse. Plus: A beer-soaked argument for the re-segregation of baseball and an absurd portrait of two macho men duking it out in court.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he media is not actually done talking about Y2K. Some of us, you see, are bummed that the world wasn't somehow forever altered on Jan. 1, 2000. We have our reasons for feeling this way. Some felt it all should have been more interesting. Others (read: Peter Jennings) simply want to believe all that hype wasn't all for <i>nothing.</i> Others still believe we live in dreadfully stable, prosperous, mesmerizing times -- where image triumphs over reality and money is seen as a virtue; disaster would be a welcome and long-overdue turn of events.</p><p><font size="1" color="#999999">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -</font></p><p>Metro Times Detroit</p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.metrotimes.com/20/13/Features/newAplocalypse.htm">"Apocalypse, please"</a> by Metro Times staff</p><p>This list of 1,000 reasons the Metro Times staff is glad the last millennium is over is actually just a shortsighted itemization of tripe from the last 50 years in pop culture. A sample: Heaven's Gate cult, Blue Oyster Cult, <i>Ishtar,</i> Jar Jar Binks, Virginia Slims ads ... Like who <i>isn't</i> pissed about "The Mummy"?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/07/y2k_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/07/y2k_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All tech, all the time</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/17/tech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/17/tech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/1999/12/17/tech</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Going e-postal and other tales of the technological revolution. Plus: Blood-spurting penises and mushrooming: adventure sport for the elite?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>here are those who would argue that <a target="new" href="http://www.sfweekly.com/issues/1999-10-27/bayview.html">too much print</a> is devoted to the topic of technology. It does seem that a senseless glut of gadget reviews and CEO profiles are spilling out from our printing presses and server rooms. But how else are we supposed to come to terms with the sweeping revolution that is taking over our lives if not by communicating it as it happens?</p><p>I am reminded of D.H. Lawrence, who frequently would step out of his novels' plots and characters (quite notably in "Lady Chatterly's Lover") to reflect on what the Industrial Revolution meant to the English countryside he grew up on. Today, his worries seem quaint. But they are a useful reference point. Like Lawrence, we are struggling to understand and explain the changing landscape of our culture. Future readers may look upon these stories and chuckle at our naiveti and excessive verbiage. For now, let's take a moment to immerse and confuse ourselves in this brave new world.</p><p><font size="1" color="#999999">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -</font></p><p>Seattle Weekly, Dec. 16-22</p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.seattleweekly.com/features/9950/arts-im.shtml">"Option envy"</a> by Soyon Im</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/17/tech/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/17/tech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unto us, a poster child is born</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/10/poster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/10/poster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/1999/12/10/poster</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are the heroes and victims upon which we affix life&#039;s tragic lessons and drill them into your head. Plus: Is James Ellroy snubbing L.A.?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>E</b>lian Gonzalez, Cassie Bernal, Matthew Shepard: How we media types love our poster children. They are supposed to be the antidotes to soulless statistics, but turning a real-life tragedy into a nationally broadcast morality play often serves to cheapen, not amplify, it. How many times do we have to look at Matthew Shephard's boyish smile and slightly mussed hair before the horror he endured ceases to register?</p><p>But there's the conundrum. We're a nation that thinks with its eyes. We'd just as soon overlook unpleasantness -- unless it comes with a pretty face and a compelling story. So we dress up tragedy in a visual language and cross our fingers that we haven't pissed all over our object lesson's life or grave. We hope we've allowed our subject to retain his or her uniqueness, even as the story ratchets up thousands of hits on the Internet. They're yelling at each other again on CNN. A poster child is born.</p><p><font size="1" color="#999999">- - - - - - - - - - - -</font></p><p>L.A. Weekly, Dec. 10-16</p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.laweekly.com/ink/00/03/first-crogan.shtml">"The Dutiful Daughter"</a> by Jim Crogan</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/10/poster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/10/poster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The unbearable lightness of Schwarzenegger</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/06/arnold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/06/arnold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/1999/12/06/arnold</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Film critics struggle to review "The End of Days" and still retain their indie cred.  Plus: The AIDS crisis in Africa and one writer&#039;s desperate attempt to get a job at Maxim.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b> do not envy film critics. Certainly, they have the distinct pleasure of viewing movies for free, days and weeks before everyone else sees them. But they also have to spend countless hours paying close attention to the worst crap spewing out of Hollywood studios. For hired snobs, it must be perverse torture.</p><p>Take the new Arnold Schwarzenegger vehicle, "End of Days." Any cognizant being could see from the previews that one word, and one word only, could describe the film and its content: "crap." But of course that doesn't get critics off the hook.</p><p>The agreeable took the easy way out and described the film as -- and I sum up -- "A rollicking, action packed, apocalyptic hootenanny!" That's fine if you're writing to endear yourself to the L.A. film publicists. Commentators who wish to maintain their indie street cred must resort to either seething disdain, stand-up comedy or some amusing combination of the two.</p><p><b>The plot</b></p><p>"A young woman (Robin Tunney of 'The Craft' in a woefully underwritten role) is the chosen bride of ... (say it like Dana Carvey's Church Lady) SATAN! If he has her during the hour immediately preceding the millennial midnight, 'the world as we know it will cease to be.' So sayeth Rod Steiger ..." (<a target="new" href="http://www.newmassmedia.com/fil.phtml?code=har&db=fil_rev&ref=8279">The Hartford Advocate</a>)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/06/arnold/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/06/arnold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attack of the holiday gift guides!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/19/gift_guide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/19/gift_guide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/1999/11/19/gift_guide</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Annual shopping-spree extravaganzas turn otherwise respectable journalists into shills for Santa Mammon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>t's holiday time! Not only do we have to put up with this godawful red and green color scheme for two and a half long months, but we must helplessly stand aside while our <a target="new" href="/shop/gift/1f.html">trusted news sources</a> and entertainment venues and our favorite hangouts are temporarily possessed by that all-consuming lord of the capitalists -- Santa Mammon.</p><p>Few, if any, can escape his bellowing cry: "Buy! Buy! Buy, dammit! Buy!"</p><p><font size="1" color="#999999">- - - - - - - - - - - -</font></p><p>Imagine, if you will, the staff of your local alternative news source as a dysfunctional family. In the basement you have the rebellious teenagers, bucking tradition, subverting social norms and crashing the family car; we call them "editorial." In the master suite you have the parents who earn the dough that feeds the brats and enables them to pursue their snotty dreams of journalistic glory -- call them "sales." For the most part, these two factions coexist in a peaceful, though tense, state. Once a year, however, the parents demand that the kids dress themselves up, grab a tin cup and make with the caroling.</p><p>The result: The dread holiday gift guide.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/19/gift_guide/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/19/gift_guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gang land</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/12/gangsters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/12/gangsters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/1999/11/12/gangsters</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the same entertainment media that have popularized gang culture be used to combat gang-related violence?  Plus: Men who collect penis bones; capital punishments throughout human history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phoenix New Times, Nov. 11-17</p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/issues/1999-11-11/feature.html">"Is It Time to Pull the Thug?"</a> by Michael Kiefer</p><p>The entertainment media have imported urban gang culture -- slogans, clothing, even violence -- to the United States' most isolated, sleepy suburbs. Now, argues Michael Kiefer in this provocative essay, it is time for the media to use its powers of persuasion to combat gang-related violence occurring in neighborhoods where there are no air-conditioned shopping malls.</p><p>Kiefer points to the many expressions of gang culture in white suburbs as proof of MTV's and other media's success in packaging and selling the deadly lifestyle: pop songs with lyrics about murder, pants with pockets for ammo sold at J.C. Penney, gang slogans appearing on T-shirts and ski caps. It's a fascinating analysis of mall fashion statements and their origins.</p><p>Of course, despite a few well-publicized exceptions, suburban teens are <i>not</i> killing each other with the frequency that inner city children are. Gangster style may have been a successful import, but the accompanying violence seems to have, for the most part, stayed put. More likely, these teens relate to this violent, outsider imagery because it fills them with a sense of power as they begin the arduous task of asserting their independence from parental authority. Harmless teenage rebellion.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/12/gangsters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/12/gangsters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick a peck o&#039; presidents</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/11/vote_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/11/vote_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/11/11/vote</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure who to vote for? Tell your views to a presidential polling site and it will pick out just the right candidate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n 1996, I was hired to cover the U.S. presidential race for a small, family-oriented Web site. It was the first election in which the Internet played any real role. And as I trolled the politics sites, I came upon what quickly became my favorite Web application: the online quiz. Unlike the old televised 1-800 poll, which required you to call, then wait a day or more to learn the outcome, the online poll was instantaneous: vote and see how you compared to others. Point. Click. Results.</p><p>The technology that runs these quizzes has not evolved much since then, but our understanding of how to make the best use of it has. Now, instead of a quiz asking whether you'd vote for Oprah or Warren, there's one that tells you who you should be voting for and why.</p><p>SelectSmart's <a target="new" href="http://www.selectsmart.com/PRESIDENT/">American Presidential Candidate Selector</a> lists 17 multiple-choice questions that gauge your opinion on key issues. It then compares your answers to the campaign promises of 18 presidential hopefuls and tells you who to vote for -- or at least whose platform comes closest to your views.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/11/vote_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/11/vote_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Girls will be jocks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/05/sports_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/05/sports_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/1999/11/05/sports</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At last, coverage of women&#039;s sports that even this non-spectator can appreciate. Plus: One writer&#039;s plaintive cry: "Enough with the sex, dammit!"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n June 1998, Royce Webb launched the <a target="new" href="http://www.sportsjones.com/">Sports Jones</a> Web site, promising intelligent, well-written sports coverage that highlighted underrepresented viewpoints in the field. "We want to understand sports, not package and sell it," his site declared.</p><p>I do not follow sports. But while the details of who made what play and who won what series may have slipped my radar, I haven't failed to notice one glaring fact: In sports reporting, women's teams (college and pro) almost always come second. I've observed that WNBA games are scheduled for 10 or 11 at night, while NBA games get prime time play. I can't remember the last time a women's sports event or issue received front-page coverage; perhaps it was Women's World Cup. When I have seen female sports stars displayed prominently, they're usually barely clothed and hawking a product or posed on the cover of a men's magazine. (You want media attention? Show us your sports bra!)</p><p>As Webb puts it: "I don't think it's [women's sports] treated with any respect. A lot of the editors, of course, come from earlier times when women's sports weren't on the map at all. Also, through the years it really has been seen as something that is covered after the 'real' sports stories."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/05/sports_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/05/sports_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vegetarian love, online</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/veggie_dates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/veggie_dates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/10/29/veggie_dates</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking for that elusive hunk of meat-shunning lovin&#039;? Try VeggieDate.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>mong the ever-growing <a target="new" href="http://www.cupidnet.com/">crowd</a> of online matchmaking sites is a meager little service called <a target="new" href="http://www.veggiedate.com">VeggieDate.</a> For $14.95 and a completed personal ad/survey you receive a lifetime membership, allowing you to surf for the meatless man or woman of your dreams.</p><p>Like most online dating services, VeggieDate is little more than an SAT-like series of multiple choice/true-and-false questions filtered through a software program and sorted into categories. When this system works, it leaves as little room as possible for the unexpected: Not only don't I want to date a meat-eater, but I want to know HOW VEGGIE ARE YOU? before I set about getting to know you. Bisexual vegans only, please.</p><p>I've searched long and hard on <a target="new" href="http://www.match.com">Match.com</a> and <a target="new" href="http://www.matchmaker.com">Matchmaker.com.</a> But nowhere did they ask me about my meat-eating habits. Elvis vs. Beatles? Salsa vs. Swing? Yes. Steak or celery? No. If I'd chosen the Internet to make my love connection, and meatlessness was my highest criteria, then why shouldn't I use VeggieDate?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/veggie_dates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/veggie_dates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bye-bye beatnik</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/beat_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/beat_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halloween]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/1999/10/29/beat</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two unusual takes on Jack Kerouac&#039;s death and legacy. Plus: Viagra raves, zines that shouldn&#039;t exist and real-life Halloween scares.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>O</b>ct. 21 marked the 30th anniversary of Jack Kerouac's death. In honor of the occasion, writers nationwide spilled ink and a few tears as they told us who he  was, who the Beats were, how very influential "On the Road" was and <i>is</i> and why "Dharma Bums" doesn't compare. Many a  well-worn, poignant anecdote was wheeled out  for the occasion: Kerouac reading the New York Times review of "On the Road"; his friendships with Ginsberg, Burroughs, et al; the drinking that eventually killed him; living with his mother.  And, of course, numerous anthologies and tributes have arrived in bookstores just in time to benefit from the outpouring of nostalgia.</p><p>The deluge of words accompanying this grim anniversary seems like a lot of fuss over what was, essentially, a one-hit wonder. Near the end of Kerouac's life, his anger against hippies and embrace of middle-class existence, save for the drinking, revealed him to be more icon than iconoclast. Yet his most famous work continues to inspire and influence our culture, so mention must be made.  Here are two of the more unusual takes I've read on the fellow's life, work, death and legacy.</p><p><font size="1" color="#999999">- - - - - - - - - - - -</font></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/beat_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/beat_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election coverage, gonzo-style</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/22/alternativevote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/22/alternativevote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/1999/10/22/alternativevote</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alternative Vote 2000 brings the counterculture to election coverage. Plus: High Times turns 25; what happens if Amazon tanks?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>E</b>very morning around 6 a.m., Frank Sennett stares into the glowing screen of his Compaq computer at his home office in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. His modest goal is to highlight alternative-press coverage of the upcoming election and in the process change the course of mainstream political reporting.</p><p>Sennett is the editor of <a target="new" href="http://www.newcity.com">NewCity.com,</a> which functions as a selective portal for the alternative press. He begins each day by scouring the Web sites of New City's 54 affiliates -- an impressive list of alternative newspapers and zines -- for news stories and features to link to.  The site's latest addition, <a target="new" href="http://www.alternativevote.com/">Alternative Vote 2000,</a> went live last week. Like NewCity, it's a portal, but focused entirely on the upcoming election. Sennett hopes Alternative Vote will "bring an alternative press-type voice back to the national campaign coverage that we really haven't seen since Rolling Stone made an impact in the '60s and '70s."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/22/alternativevote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/22/alternativevote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rogue advertisers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/15/speak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/15/speak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ikea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/1999/10/15/speak</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who&#039;s to blame for trashy mags? Intestinal fatigue? Speak and others grapple with their demons. Plus: Embalming alternatives and Ikea obsession.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>hen we last left our friends at <a target="new" href="http://www.speakmag.com/speakmag/index.html">Speak,</a> the world was coming to an end at the magazine's headquarters in San Francisco. Or so it seemed. In the Summer issue, publisher/editor Dan Rolleri wrote a heartrending editor's note about his struggle for survival in an industry dominated by fat-cat glossies with lame content and seemingly endless streams of revenue. Why, Dan wondered, did <a href="/media/feature/1999/10/01/media/index.html">glossy titty mags</a> like Maxim and GQ get all the dough while quality publications scraped by, issue to issue?</p><p>My <a href="/media/col/shre/1999/06/11/jarjargay/index.html">response</a> was that advertisers simply put the money where the eyeballs are. Four out of five eyeballs prefer crap to quality. Advertisers have a job to do. They want to reach as many eyeballs as possible, and preferably eyeballs that will be interested in what you have to sell. Hence, sports gear in Gear, cosmetics in Cosmo, and so on. If you want to have an intelligent, beautiful publication that's fine. But you shouldn't be shocked if subscription cards aren't overflowing your mailbox and advertisers aren't pounding down your door, wads of cash in hand, no strings attached.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/15/speak/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/15/speak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burn, sacred cow, burn!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/08/sacredcow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/08/sacredcow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shre/1999/10/08/sacredcow</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lefty weeklies turn on their idols. Plus: Ben is Dead dies, the 17th Annual Testicle Festival and the boy who said yes -- and lived.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>here was a time when the political left could pretty much rely on alternative weeklies to toe the liberal line. That time has passed. While activism certainly <a href="/media/col/shre/1999/09/03/protests/index.html">isn't dead</a> -- it's hotter than ever, according to <a target="new" href="http://www.bostonphoenix.com/archive/features/99/10/07/SEATTLE.html">some reports</a> -- the fiery idealism that once fueled acts of political derring-do have been dampened by chillier, postmodern perspectives. Once-alternative weeklies are being <a href="/media/feature/1999/09/29/voice/index.html">sucked up</a> like Slurpee ice by faceless parent companies with bottom lines and conservative advertisers to consider. Hoisting sacred cows onto the flaming pyre of our smug self-awareness is en vogue (as is wanton use of clichid metaphors, or so I've been told). Over are the days when Karen Finley and artists who pissed, figuratively and literally, upon our holy icons were made into holy icons, when Mumia Abu Jamal was presumed innocent, a <a href="/news/feature/1999/07/10/mumia/index.html">saintlike martyr</a> for the activist set.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/08/sacredcow/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/08/sacredcow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
