<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Joe Landry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/joe_landry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:14:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The real way to fix the deficit: Stop coddling the rich</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_real_way_to_fix_the_deficit_stop_coddling_the_rich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_real_way_to_fix_the_deficit_stop_coddling_the_rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of cutting aid to the poor, the president and Congress should focus on reforming costly tax expenditures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" align="left" /></a> While we often hear critics decrying the redistributive effects of American social spending, government aid does not always benefit households of limited means. Often, aid looks more like a million-dollar vacation home or a luxury health insurance plan than housing vouchers and food stamps. American social spending is more complex than a simple redistribution from high- to low-income households. Over time, the country’s tax and transfer system has adopted provisions that reward specific high-income households. These programs contribute to deficit growth and detract from spending targeted at alleviating poverty among working families.</p><p>The most generous social welfare programs are currently administered through the tax code. A list of itemized deductions on households’ income tax returns serves as the only indication of these benefits. Income tax deductions, exclusions, deferrals, and credits, known collectively as “tax expenditures,” amount to more than $1 trillion of federal spending (according to estimates by the <a href="http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/1001542-Spending-In-Disguise-Marron.pdf" target="_blank">Tax Policy Center</a>), not including lower tax rates on capital gains and dividends to encourage investment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_real_way_to_fix_the_deficit_stop_coddling_the_rich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_real_way_to_fix_the_deficit_stop_coddling_the_rich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>