<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Jonathan Steele</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/jonathan_steele/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Two million tragedies we can&#8217;t ignore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/04/darfur_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/04/darfur_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/06/04/darfur</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless Sudan wants 20 more years of civil war, it must rein in the Janjaweed and ensure that next week's peace talks bear fruit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Tony Blair and Gordon Brown gear up for next month's G8 summit, with its focus on Africa, the <a href="http://archive.salon.com/news/feature/2005/05/17/darfur/index.html">crisis of Darfur</a> appears unlikely to get more than a passing mention. Nor is Bob Geldof's new crusade for Africa focused on it. </p><p>Yet Darfur is arguably a greater catastrophe than Ethiopia was when Live Aid held its fundraising concerts 20 years ago. In Ethiopia massive famine coincided with civil war, but the famine was caused by drought. War complicated the relief effort but was not the primary problem. In Sudan's western region of Darfur the crisis is man-made: Civil war has created famine. As U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan pointed out on a visit to refugee camps last week, 2 million of the region's 6 million people have fled their homes because of attacks. </p><p>Even if they felt safe to go home, there is nothing there to eat. Less than a third of the arable land was planted this season. Vast quantities of food will be needed for at least a year, for people both in the camps and in the villages, if they return. The food can only come from donations. Of course, it is still too dangerous for most people to leave the camps. Rape and pillage go on unabated, as horseback raiders known as Janjaweed continue their ethnic cleansing. The Sudanese government has consistently denied responsibility, claiming the militias are beyond its control. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/06/04/darfur_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/04/darfur_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pull Britain out of Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/09/blair_iraq_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/09/blair_iraq_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/05/09/blair_iraq</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has Blair the guts to tell Bush that he cannot stand beside him any longer on a war that is unpopular with Britons?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony Blair insists British troops cannot leave Iraq until Iraq's own police and army can guarantee security. It is, of course, the same argument that George W. Bush uses to justify keeping close to 150,000 U.S. soldiers in the country. Never mind the fact that pulling foreign troops out would almost certainly improve Iraq's security, since much of the violence is directed against the occupation. Without the occupation, the insurgency would decline dramatically. </p><p>Let us take Blair's position at face value. Has he not noticed that in Basra and the other two southeastern provinces where British forces are based the insurgency barely exists? It is true that another British soldier died last week in Amara, a traditionally difficult town, but Basra has been quiet for months. Suicide bombers are conspicuous by their absence. Attacks on British forces are rare, and fatalities even rarer. On Iraq's election day in January there was almost no violence. </p><p>The reasons are varied, the main one being that the Shiite political groups that control Basra are taking the long view. They form the backbone of Iraq's new government in Baghdad and have no particular complaint with the current drift of Iraqi politics nationally. Although they are Islamists, the conservative stamp they have put on the city has not been opposed by the British. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/09/blair_iraq_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/09/blair_iraq_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Forgotten casualties of war&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/25/armed_girls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/25/armed_girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/04/25/armed_girls</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report looks at the problems of girls caught up in armed conflicts, many of whom are forced into sex slavery.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A hidden army of more than 120,000 girls is working or fighting with armed groups around the world, and international programs to help them often fail or make things worse, Save the Children says in a report published Monday. </p><p>Girls as young as 8 are abducted and forced to live with armed groups. Some carry weapons; others serve as porters, cleaners and cooks. Almost all are forced to be sex slaves or "wives" of commanders, Save the Children says in the report, titled "Forgotten Casualties of War: Girls in Armed Conflict." </p><p>While the horror of child soldiers is well known, the report says the focus of international concern is usually on boys. But out of roughly 300,000 children estimated to be living with armed groups, about 40 percent are girls. </p><p>Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programs are usually initiated after a conflict by the United Nations and the World Bank, but the report says they often ignore the special problems girls face. Their homecoming is often as depressing as their departure. They are ostracized by their family and community because of their "immoral" experiences. As a result, they are trapped between recrimination from the armed group if they leave and from the community if they return home. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/04/25/armed_girls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/25/armed_girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t be fooled by the spin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/13/iraq_occupation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/13/iraq_occupation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/04/13/iraq_occupation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After two years of U.S. control, Iraqis' hatred of the occupation is greater than ever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saddam Hussein's effigy was pulled down again in Baghdad's Firdos Square over the weekend. But unlike the made-for-TV event when U.S. troops first entered the Iraqi capital, the toppling of Saddam on the occupation's second anniversary was different. Instead of being done by U.S. marines with a few dozen Iraqi bystanders, 300,000 Iraqis were on hand. They threw down effigies of George W. Bush and Tony Blair as well as the old dictator, at a rally that did not celebrate liberation but called for the immediate departure of foreign troops. </p><p>For most Iraqis, with the exception of the Kurds, Washington's "liberation" never was. Wounded national pride was greater than relief at Saddam's departure. Iraqis were angered by the failure to get power and water supplies repaired, the brutality of U.S. Army tactics, and the disappearance of their country's precious oil revenues into inadequately supervised accounts, handed to foreigners under contracts that produced no benefits for Iraqis. </p><p>From last autumn's disastrous attack on Fallujah to the huge increase in detention without trial, the casualties go on rising. After an amnesty last summer, the number of "security detainees" has gone up again, reaching a record 17,000. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/04/13/iraq_occupation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/13/iraq_occupation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defining terrorism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/11/annan_terrorism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/11/annan_terrorism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/03/11/annan_terrorism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alluding to the actions of the U.S. and Britain in Iraq, Kofi Annan attacks the erosion of human rights in the war on terror.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan launched a fierce attack on Britain and the United States Thursday for weakening human rights in the name of the war on terror. "We cannot compromise on core values," he said in Madrid on the first anniversary of the train bombings that killed 191 people in the Spanish capital. "Human rights and the rule of law must always be respected." </p><p>Addressing a three-day conference that included about 20 heads of state and government as well as terrorism experts, lawyers and journalists, Annan laid out five elements in what he called a "principled, comprehensive strategy" to fight terrorism. He proposed a U.N. special envoy to monitor whether governments' counterterrorism measures conformed to international human rights law. "Compromising human rights cannot serve the struggle against terrorism," he said. "On the contrary, it facilitates the achievement of the terrorists' objectives by provoking tension, hatred and mistrust of governments among precisely those parts of the population where he is most likely to find recruits." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/11/annan_terrorism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/11/annan_terrorism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The next hurdle to democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/31/after_iraq_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/31/after_iraq_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/01/31/after_iraq_election</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although Shiites are the majority in Iraq, they remain deeply split. The crucial question now is whose values the elected National Assembly chooses to enshrine in a new constitution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever wins Sunday's election, the crucial issue for Iraq over the coming months -- apart from the future of the insurgency and whether foreign troops give a timetable for leaving -- will be the process of writing Iraq's first democratic constitution. The 275 members chosen Sunday for the National Assembly will be in charge of the process. Will the new constitution enshrine sharia law? Will it protect women's property and divorce rights? Will it maintain the system of federalism that was written into Iraq's temporary constitution by the Americans a year ago? If it does not, will this provoke the Kurds in northern Iraq to break away? </p><p>If Sunday night's early indications of support for the incumbent, Ayad Allawi, in the largely Shiite southern provinces is confirmed in Baghdad and even those Sunni areas that voted, he will be assured of staying in the job. He took a risk in standing on his own ticket rather than seeking to ally himself with the Kurds and Shiites with whom he is in coalition in the present government. </p><p>But he decided to put his own reputation to the test, a that which appears to have paid off. He had the advantage of incumbency, and in recent days many Iraqis interviewed by reporters praised him for raising pensions and salaries for teachers and other government workers as well as the police. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/01/31/after_iraq_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/31/after_iraq_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can elections really change things?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/28/iraq_election_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/28/iraq_election_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/01/28/iraq_election</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sunday's vote won't restore Iraq's sovereignty because the key issue of how long the occupation should continue is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stroll, if you dare, along the Shatt al Arab, the fast-flowing waterway that connects this city to the Persian Gulf, and you come across a sad-looking park. Where children shrieked on roundabouts and families enjoyed the shade on summer evenings, birds are now the only living creatures behind padlocked gates. </p><p>The invading British expropriated the park, and put it inside a no man's land overlooked by gun turrets, when they took over the palace complex that Saddam Hussein built a little farther along the waterfront. Now the dictator's compound is a smaller version of Baghdad's Green Zone, housing the British and American consulates and loads of portable toilets for security guards and other contractors. Iraqi workers are busy digging the ground for a swimming pool. </p><p>The British Consulate must surely be the most secluded, and the most bizarre, in the world -- a sprawling sandstone villa behind 12-foot-high concrete walls and three rows of razor wire strung through the water. </p><p>Two tugboats proceed down the river, pushing what appear to be empty barges. "Oil smugglers," says a diplomat as two British patrol boats speed past in the opposite direction, taking no notice. "There are probably a thousand tons in each one." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/01/28/iraq_election_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/28/iraq_election_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise, surprise, there were no WMD</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/13/no_wmd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/13/no_wmd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/01/13/no_wmd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But Bush sticks to his guns on whether invading Iraq was worth the cost.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. investigators searching for Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction have given up the hunt and left Iraq with an appeal to the Pentagon for the release of several <a href="http://archive.salon.com/opinion/feature/2004/09/24/hostages/">Iraqi scientists</a> still being questioned, it was reported Wednesday. Charles Duelfer, who led the Iraq Survey Group, has returned to the United States and will deliver a final report in the spring that will be almost identical to the interim assessment he delivered to Congress last October. That assessment found that Saddam had destroyed his last weapons of mass destruction more than 10 years ago, and his capacity to build new ones had been dwindling for years by the time of the second Gulf war. </p><p>"Charlie has left Iraq," an intelligence official said yesterday. "In terms of the weapons hunt in a proactive sense, it has concluded, and the report is being tweaked a bit but it will be largely unchanged." But he added: "There is a considerable amount of document exploitation to be done that will continue to occur, and leads that come out of the exploitation will be followed up." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/01/13/no_wmd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/13/no_wmd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tragedy and opportunity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/11/05/palestinians_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/11/05/palestinians_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2004/11/05/palestinians</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With or without Arafat, Sharon and Bush now have a window in which to change their policies and resume negotiating with the Palestinians.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the days when Britain was being forced to give up one colony after another, the phrase "father of the nation" was much in vogue. Julius Nyerere in Tanzania, Archbishop Makarios in Cyprus and Kenneth Kaunda in Zambia were among the many who won this informal title -- not just from journalists in search of a label but, more importantly, from their own people. As teachers, clerics or trade unionists who became political leaders, they were seen as the chief architects of the struggle for independence. </p><p>Forty years on from the age of decolonization, Yasser Arafat is the last man who can claim that status. In many ways his title is even more deserved. He had to win recognition of the fact that there was such a thing as a Palestinian nation at all. For decades, the Arab states and the British, who initially had the mandate to run Palestine, and the Israelis, who moved into the land, refused to accept there were Palestinian people, let alone a nation. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/11/05/palestinians_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/11/05/palestinians_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The other hostages in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/24/hostages_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/24/hostages_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2004/09/24/hostages</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The coalition is reluctant to release prisoners like "Dr. Germ" because they know too much -- they might reveal the fraud behind the invasion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They sit in their solitary cells all day, uncharged with any crime. No family member, no friend, no lawyer may visit. Their freedom depends on a callous game of Pentagon roulette. Word filters out that they are about to be released. Then word follows that -- alas -- it will take a bit more time. These are America's Iraqi hostages, whose captivity in a high-security camp at Baghdad airport has already lasted for over a year. The two women scientists whose fate has been spotlighted this week belong to a larger group of Iraqi prisoners who should not have been held so long. </p><p>Their cases cannot be compared to that of British engineer Kenneth Bigley or the other foreigners kidnapped by fundamentalist groups. The circumstances are different. The motivations are different. Their treatment is different. Public humiliation by video, repeated threats of imminent death and filmed beheadings are bestial. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the presumed perpetrator of this cruelty, claims to be acting in the name of the Iraqi resistance. In fact, he is a parasite on the occupation, seeking its cover to advance the goal of an extreme theocratic state, which few Iraqis share. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/09/24/hostages_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/24/hostages_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The murder of more than 250,000 peaceful civilians&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/chechen_rebels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/chechen_rebels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/09/07/chechen_rebels</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Chechen Web site says the school siege is retribution for brutal acts by Russian forces.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Details began to emerge Sunday as to what may have driven the school siege militants, as yet unidentified, to commit such a horrifying act against children. Witnesses reported that the hostage takers had attempted to justify their brutality by claiming it was an act of revenge for the killing by Russian forces of Chechen children. Margarita Komoyeva, a physics teacher released the day before the terrible climax in Beslan, said: "One of them told me: 'Russian soldiers are killing our children in Chechnya, so we are here to kill yours.'" </p><p>Those words were amplified Sunday on a <a target="new" href="http://www.kavkazcenter.org ">Web site</a> that is connected to Shamil Basayev, the most extreme Chechen commander, whom Russian officials think was the mastermind behind the Beslan atrocity. "However many children in that school were held hostage, however many of them will die (and have already died) ... it is incomparably less than the 42,000 Chechen children of school age who have been killed by Russian invaders," said the statement. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/chechen_rebels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/chechen_rebels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Why should we talk to people who are child killers?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/putin_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/putin_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/09/07/putin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Putin defends Russia's policy toward  Chechnya as the people of Beslan bury their dead.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russian President Vladimir Putin Monday night refused to order a public inquiry into how the Beslan school was captured by gunmen and resulted in such a high death toll. </p><p>He told the Guardian that people who call for talks with Chechen leaders have no conscience. "Why don't you meet Osama bin Laden, invite him to Brussels or to the White House and engage in talks, ask him what he wants and give it to him so he leaves you in peace? Why don't you do that?" he said with searing sarcasm. "You find it possible to set some limitations in your dealings with these bastards, so why should we talk to people who are child killers? "No one has a moral right to tell us to talk to child killers," he added. </p><p>"Correct me if I'm wrong, but Margaret Thatcher, whom I've met more than once, said: 'A man who comes out into the street to kill other people must himself be killed,'" he told the Guardian. </p><p>At times grim-faced, but always calm, Putin made his comments in the midst of an extraordinary three-and-a-half-hour meeting with a group of foreign journalists and academics with long experience in Russia, invited for a special conference. Held in Putin's country house outside Moscow, the question-and-answer session ended after midnight. It was his first meeting with foreigners since the Beslan catastrophe. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/putin_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/putin_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silence of the state</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/russian_press/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/russian_press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/09/07/russian_press</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The editor of Izvestia is sacked after the paper criticizes the Russian government for censorship of coverage of the Beslan crisis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The editor of Russia's best known daily, Izvestia, was sacked yesterday, two days after the newspaper carried strong criticism of the government's handling of the Beslan school tragedy. Raf Shakirov lost his job after the paper questioned officials' claim that the number of hostages was only 350, reported that parents of the hostages entered the school ahead of the security forces, and published a powerful column denouncing the censored coverage of the events by state TV. </p><p>Under the headline "The Silence of the State Broadcasters," Irina Petrovskaya said the state channels panicked when the shooting started last Friday and failed to give live coverage like CNN, BBC and the independent Russian radio station Ekho Moskvy. They had to wait for instructions on what to show and what to say, she said. This was the approach that dominated the coverage from that moment, and it would continue. </p><p>"I'm sure that when the official version of what happened is worked out and approved on high, we'll be showered with more lies and muck. I'm also sure that those who used their own understanding of professionalism and reported things which they should not have done will be reprimanded," Petrovskaya wrote. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/russian_press/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/07/russian_press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please, not again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/08/27/iran_66/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/08/27/iran_66/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2004/08/27/iran</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. claims about Iran's nuclear program sound eerily familiar, but Britain should refuse to go to war this time.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History is beginning to repeat itself, this time over Iran. Just two years after the notorious Downing Street dossier on Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction and the first efforts to get United Nations approval for war, Washington is trying to create similar pressures for action against Iran. </p><p>The ingredients are well-known: sexed-up intelligence material that puts the target country in the worst possible light; moves to get the U.N. to declare it in "noncompliance," thereby claiming justification for going in unilaterally even if the U.N. gives no support for an invasion; and at the back of the whole brouhaha, a clique of American neoconservatives whose real agenda is regime change. </p><p>The immediate focus for action against Iran is the International Atomic Energy Agency, which has produced five reports on Iran in the past 14 months. Part of the U.N., with an international board that acts like a mini-Security Council, the IAEA's reports have raised questions about Iran's professedly civilian nuclear program and its desire to create its own fuel cycle, which could eventually be used to produce bombs. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/08/27/iran_66/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/08/27/iran_66/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>War is hot! Diplomacy, so uncool</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/08/06/diplomacy_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/08/06/diplomacy_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/08/06/diplomacy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In both Sudan and Sri Lanka, the route to peace is through negotiation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cold war was a time of hot diplomacy. Because in Europe the great contest of the second half of the last century was deadlocked on the battlefield, it was fought largely at superpower summit meetings and lower-level arms control talks. The subject matter was technical and, barring an occasional breakthrough, progress was slow. But the issues were huge, and for that reason politicians and the press followed the negotiations closely. </p><p> Now the stage is reversed. A plethora of hot wars over the last decade has turned people cold on diplomacy. The Churchillian adage that jaw-jaw is better than war-war is forgotten in favour of the faulty notion that applying superior military power is the best way to handle stubborn political conflicts. </p><p> One reason is television, which increasingly sets the agenda for newspapers as well as governments. If there is no image there is no message, so political negotiations are condemned as inherently dull, if not irrelevant, compared to the visual drama of war. The other is the cult of impatience, caused by the new craze for humanitarian intervention and the excessive injection of morality into international disputes. If a conflict is projected as a struggle against evil-doers, then there is not a moment to lose. Delay itself becomes a form of moral appeasement and wickedness. When military action is crowned with rapid results and the bad guys' defeat, as in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq, the illusion is created that a solution has been reached. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/08/06/diplomacy_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/08/06/diplomacy_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Baghdad ER</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/07/30/iraq_80/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/07/30/iraq_80/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/07/30/iraq</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aggression, corruption and courage -- a night in a hospital offers a glimpse at a city in tumult.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Unconscious, a woman lies in the emergency ward as doctors struggle to save her life after she was knocked down by a hit-and-run driver. Her teenage son and daughter, her husband, and four other male relatives crowd round the hospital trolley. </p><p> When a young house doctor writes out a chit for more plastic bottles of saline solution or more disposable needles, one of the family rushes off to the hospital pharmacy to get the supplies. More often, the huddle of jostling people is a nuisance and - with the danger of grief that can suddenly turn to rage - a threat. </p><p> An evening in the Yarmuk hospital in western Baghdad is like a microcosm of Iraq's tense, no-holds-barred society; aggression, corruption, shortages and courageous efforts by a few people to improvise solutions. </p><p> It is also a window on the random violence which faces the capital's residents from bombs, street gangs and kidnappers. </p><p> In one bed lies a young man shot in the back in a quarrel between two families. Two police officers sit on another bed. One is bleeding from the mouth, the other has gashes on his forehead. They were attacked while arresting a street gang. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/07/30/iraq_80/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/07/30/iraq_80/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iraq chief given sweeping powers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/07/09/iraq_79/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/07/09/iraq_79/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/07/09/iraq</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security law has built-in checks to keep prime minister in check.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Iraq's new prime minister, Ayad Allawi, was Wednesday given sweeping powers to counter insurgents, including the right to declare a state of emergency and impose nationwide curfews. </p><p> The package of measures will also allow him to appoint military governors to take charge of cities or provinces, close Iraq's borders, seize the assets of suspects and monitor their phone calls and emails.</p><p> The national security law, passed unanimously by the cabinet, was unveiled by ministers in the heavily guarded "green zone" in central Baghdad as masked fighters battled Iraqi police and US troops less than a mile away. </p><p> Although car bombs and mortar attacks have become a regular feature in the capital, it was the first time running gun battles have taken place in daylight so close to the centre.</p><p> The emergency law has several built-in safeguards to prevent the risk of another one-man dictatorship. Article 12 states that it cannot be used to delay the national elections set for January. Article 11 says it cannot abrogate the interim constitution agreed in March.</p><p> This constitution point was demanded by Kurdish ministers who were upset last month when the UN security council approved the transfer of sovereignty but failed to mention the constitution, which protects Kurdish autonomy and gives Kurds certain veto rights.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/07/09/iraq_79/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/07/09/iraq_79/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

