<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Judy Berman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/judy_berman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Liz Phair&#8217;s hilarious novelty album</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/07/liz_phair_funstyle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/07/liz_phair_funstyle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/07/liz_phair_funstyle</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's no doubt that "Funstyle" is a bizarre record -- but we should be laughing with her, not at her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend, Liz Phair put out her first album in nearly five years. Like many artists fed up with the record label system, she self-released "Funstyle" on her <a href="http://www.lizphair.com">website</a>, offering the track "Bollywood" (posted below) as a free sample. When I listened to the song for the first time, my reaction was similar to <a href="http://jezebel.com/5579449/liz-phair-raps-confuses-in-her-new-single-bollywood">Hortense Smith's at Jezebel</a>: WTF? Against a backbeat of schlocky, broad-strokes Indian pop, Phair (kind of) raps the story of how she got roped into writing music for cable TV. The result is every bit as strange and unnerving as it sounds. I immediately wrote the song off as a desperate attempt to regain relevance in a post-M.I.A. pop-music world and resolved to ignore the career death rattle of a musician I once respected. Better just to listen to "Exile in Guyville" and pretend that 21st-century Liz Phair was all a bad dream.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/07/liz_phair_funstyle/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/07/liz_phair_funstyle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter tiff: Courtney Love vs. Billy Corgan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/courtney_love_billy_corgan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/courtney_love_billy_corgan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtney Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/04/27/courtney_love_billy_corgan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ex-lovers and former collaborators are at war again. But you'll never guess who's being classy about it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today's big-name Twitter battle is a celebrity death match straight out of "I&#160;Love the '90s." In one corner, we have Courtney Love, who has recently made headlines for losing custody of her daughter, (maybe) <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/04/21/courtney_love_name_change_michelle/index.html">temporarily changing her name</a>, and putting out a <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/04/27/courtney_love_returns/index.html">surprisingly fantastic new album</a>. In the other,&#160;Smashing Pumpkins main man Billy Corgan, who's been connected romantically to the likes of Jessica Simpson and Tila Tequila, is in the process of releasing his latest <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teargarden_by_Kaleidyscope">11-EP magnum opus</a> and has some <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/oct/29/billy-corgan-swine-flu">frighteningly nutty thoughts</a> about the origins of swine flu. Love and Corgan have been friends, lovers and collaborators on and off for about 20 years -- and this is far from the first time they've fought in public. Considering the history and personalities involved, this Twitter matchup has all the makings of a crazy-fest that could put <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/04/24/this_week_in_crazy_scott_baio/index.html">Scott Baio</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/02/12/this_week_in_crazy_mayer">John Mayer</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/04/13/celebrity_twitter_disasters/index.html">Ice-T</a> to shame.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/courtney_love_billy_corgan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/courtney_love_billy_corgan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courtney Love kills Courtney Love</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/21/courtney_love_name_change_michelle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/21/courtney_love_name_change_michelle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtney Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/04/21/courtney_love_name_change_michelle</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hole icon's name change is just the latest move in a career marked by failed reinventions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Courtney is all out of Love.&#160;That's right: One of the most recognizable women in music is <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8633339.stm">changing her iconic pseudonym</a>. Now, the Hole frontwoman and pop-culture whipping girl only wants us to call her "Courtney Michelle." In an interview with the NME, she explained her reasons for chucking "Love" and replacing it with her given middle name:&#160;"The name Courtney Love is a way to oppress me," she said. "We've all decided we don't like her any more ... We love her when she goes onstage, but I don't need her in the rest of my life."</p><p>The name change is certainly a bombshell, and given that Love/Michelle broke the news less than a week before the release of Hole's <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8633339.stm">new album</a>, "Nobody's Daughter," it's easy to paint it as nothing more than a publicity move. But it also speaks loudly to what has always fascinated me about Love -- what has, in fact, made it totally impossible for me to join the swelling ranks of those who would vilify or ridicule her.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/21/courtney_love_name_change_michelle/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/21/courtney_love_name_change_michelle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s afraid of the word &#8220;feminism&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/venus_generational_feminism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/venus_generational_feminism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/03/25/venus_generational_feminism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The publisher of a women's music magazine trashes "the f word" as outdated, but she's the one who's out of touch]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning, when music critic and <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2009/06/11/girls_rock">"The Girls Guide to Rocking"</a> author Jessica Hopper <a href="http://twitter.com/jesshopp/status/11040271145">tweeted</a>, "<span class="status-body"><span class="status-content"><span class="entry-content">Venus' new publisher sez feminism 'isn't relevant' to the new version of the mag, hires ed from Martha Stewart,"&#160;I&#160;wanted to believe she was joking. But then I followed her link to a <a href="http://www.chicagoreader.com/gyrobase/venus-magazine-amy-schroeder-sarah-beardsley/Content?oid=1570058&amp;storyPage=1">Chicago&#160;Reader article</a> that confirmed it: The <a href="http://www.venuszine.com">magazine</a> that began in 1995 as a one-woman, college-dorm-room project with the mission of covering "women in music, art, film, fashion, and DIY culture because not a lot of other publications do" is <em>so over</em> feminism.</span></span></span></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/venus_generational_feminism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/venus_generational_feminism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bra sizes balloon: Blame obesity!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/24/bra_size_increase_bigger_boobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/24/bra_size_increase_bigger_boobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/03/24/bra_size_increase_bigger_boobs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's convenient to assume our expanding waistlines are causing our expanding bustlines. Too bad it's not true]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, <a href="http://www.wwd.com/markets-news/bigger-bra-sizes-bolster-sales-3005732?browsets=1269369911470">Women's Wear Daily</a> gave "breast men"&#160;(and women) everywhere something to celebrate: Bra sizes are up!&#160;Way up!&#160;While the median size just 10 years ago was 36C, the median American rack now fills a porn-ready 36DD!</p><p>But don't throw a party yet: As basically everyone who's covered the spike so far has pointed out, this is not a good thing.&#160;In fact, the consensus is that we're buying larger bras because -- you guessed it -- we're fat. <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2010/03/the_full-figured_bra_business.html">Amy Odell at The Cut</a> is so sure of this that she treats it as a foregone conclusion: "Our boobs are bigger because we are more obese, of course."&#160;Of course! <a href="http://www.thefrisky.com/post/246-american-bra-sizes-keep-growing-and-growing/">Wendy Atterberry at The Frisky</a> spins the news as a silver lining to the puffy cloud that is our national weight problem: "It's no secret that Americans are getting fatter each decade (obesity rates have doubled since 1980), but the news isn't <em>all</em> bad. The upside to our bigger waistlines? Bigger bustlines to go with them!" At least Margaret at Jezebel is <a href="http://jezebel.com/5500379/the-marketing-woes-of-36dd">onto something</a> when she points out that obesity alone is unlikely to have caused a "sudden 7.7 percent increase in sales last year."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/24/bra_size_increase_bigger_boobs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/24/bra_size_increase_bigger_boobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When a bridezilla&#8217;s family attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/bridezilla_video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/bridezilla_video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/03/10/bridezilla_video</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A spat over a wedding dress ends in violence. Should we be surprised?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone has a story about a bride who went over the edge. You know, the one who made her bridesmaids starve themselves so as not to ruin the wedding pictures or the lady who wouldn't stop calling the florist in the wee hours of the morning, mid-panic attack, unable to choose between peonies and lilies.&#160;But no matter what horror story you have to bring to the table, here's one that'll be hard to beat: The bride who <a href="http://gawker.com/5489803/bridezilla-brawl-caught-on-closed-circuit-camera">incited an all-out brawl</a> after an exasperated shop owner wouldn't alter her wedding dress.</p><p>The scene took place last week at First Lady Bridal&#160;Shop in Lathrup&#160;Village, a small city outside Detroit, when a frustrated bride and her posse "<a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20100310/METRO/3100398/1411/METRO02/Suspects-in-Lathrup-Village-bridal-shop-melee-headed-to-court">entered the store</a> ... made demands for alterations and began verbally abusing employees." When they didn't get any satisfaction, they called in some male members of the family, who burst into the store and began beating the shop owner, his wife and their son. (Watch security footage of the sad and ridiculous spectacle below.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/bridezilla_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/bridezilla_video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocker: Small condoms don&#8217;t sell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/26/small_condoms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/26/small_condoms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2010/02/26/small_condoms</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds like a bad joke, but there's nothing funny about ill-fitting prophylactics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, did you hear the one about the guy whose penis was so small he couldn't find a condom to fit him? Well, what sounds like a tired joke is actually the premise of a smart Atlanic piece called <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/02/the-challenge-of-marketing-small-condoms/36464/">"The Challenge of Marketing Small&#160;Condoms."</a> And while it may seem self-evident that most dudes aren't lining up to buy a love glove that will brand their member tiny, the effects of this lack of appropriately sized condoms (or men with the confidence and self-awareness to buy them) are nothing to laugh about: As the post's author, Menachem Kaiser notes, 45 percent of men own up to having worn an ill-fitting condom within the past three months. Since wearing the wrong size condom can lead to everything from slippage to breakage, it stands to reason that these guys are putting themselves and their partners at risk for pregnancy and STDs.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/26/small_condoms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/26/small_condoms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scariest Olympic sport?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/olympic_skeleton_not_dangerous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/olympic_skeleton_not_dangerous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Olympics 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/02/19/olympic_skeleton_not_dangerous</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plunging head-first down a sliding track at 85 mph looks dangerous, but skeleton fans defend its safety]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/winter_olympics_2010/index.html?story=/news/2010/02/12/oly_luger_dies">tragic death</a> of Olympic luger Nodar Kumaritashvili cast a harsher spotlight on one of the more obscure Olympic events. But what of the even less known, but seemingly more dangerous sport of skeleton, where competitors hurtle down ice chutes head-first?</p><p>After brief Olympic appearances in 1928 and 1948, the sport of skeleton wasn't reinstated until 2002's games in Salt Lake City. And while, following Kumaritashvili's death, the luge event was moved to safer, shortened courses, the skeleton (the finals are Friday night) and bobsled events continued on the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/14/AR2010021402443.html">original, full-length course</a> at Vancouver's Whistler Sliding Center, home of the fastest track in the world.</p><p>"The Whistler track is super-fast due to its grade," racer Noelle Pikus-Pace, one of two American women to compete in this year's event, <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/02/14/eveningnews/main6208176.shtml">explained to CBS News</a>. "From curve one down to curve three, we drop so quickly so suddenly ... Any error can cause injury." Melissa Hollingsworth, a Canadian skeleton athlete and a top competitor for the gold medal, has said in no uncertain terms that the course is <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/lizziegreenwoodhughes/2010/02/tragedy_of_terrifying_whistler.html">"dangerous."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/olympic_skeleton_not_dangerous/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/olympic_skeleton_not_dangerous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The awful Courtney Love album no one&#8217;s heard yet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/18/courtney_love_nobodys_daughter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/18/courtney_love_nobodys_daughter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2010/02/17/courtney_love_nobodys_daughter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could music bloggers at least wait until "Nobody's Daughter" comes out to trash it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't waste your time on the <a href="http://%20www.spin.com/articles/exclusive-new-hole-record-arrives-april">new album</a> by Courtney Love's re-formed band, Hole. I mean, "Nobody's Daughter" isn't coming out until&#160;April 27, and I&#160;haven't even heard it yet. But if the music blogosphere -- which also hasn't listened to the record -- is to be believed, it's going to be one heck of a trainwreck. And it doesn't seem likely that the media will put Love's personal life aside to focus on her music any time soon.</p><p>Just about every publication that covers music is taking Wednesday's announcement of the record's label and release date as a chance to weigh in on the rock widow's crazy antics. At <a href="http://%20blogs.philadelphiaweekly.com/music/2010/02/15/courtney-love-shows-off-her-new-hole/">Philadelphia Weekly</a>, the news came coupled with the perpetual question of whether Courtney Love is an "inspirational, influential, odds-overcoming tough-chick rocker, or manipulative, soulless, fame-grubbing monster." Dude site <a href="http://www.heavy.com/post/courtney-love-blows-hole-3723">Heavy</a> captions a photo of Love with the sarcastic quip, "How can you stand to miss this hotness?" and then (perhaps to meet some quota for the use of the word "hot") refers to her as a "hot mess." Meanwhile, the folks at New York magazine's <a href="http://%20nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/02/courtney_love_gets_a_release_d.html">Vulture</a> prefer to describe Love as a "famous crazy lady" and close their post with an extra dose of <em>schadenfreude</em>: "We wish Love a smooth, uneventful promotional run, and look forward to the exact opposite of that happening."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/18/courtney_love_nobodys_daughter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/18/courtney_love_nobodys_daughter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video of the day: Best. Wedding trailer. Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/wedding_trailers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/wedding_trailers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/01/22/wedding_trailers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If "Save the Date" videos must exist, then they should all be this amazing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that it's so cheap and easy to make videos and post them online, there's a trailer for everything: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQzYFKWBSbA">Lady Gaga albums</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjWKPdDk0_U">Thomas Pynchon novels</a> (Is that Tommy Chong narrating?) ... and, inevitably, weddings. Most of these "Save the Date" videos are as as precious as you'd expect -- a couple gushing about their first date, bragging about their unique and timeless love and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TuChQ4QQB8">making out in front of pretty scenery</a>.&#160;There have also been the obligatory <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRnHbrCDxmM">"Single Ladies"</a>&#160;ripoffs, the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0EkCW4LTpI&amp;feature=fvw">awkward attempts</a> to be funny and irreverent and even the occasional <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oltdQSJt2hU">quirkily adorable</a> clips. Hell, one photographer has even made a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKA5go_IW-g">trailer</a> for her wedding trailer business.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/wedding_trailers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/wedding_trailers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Levi Johnston: Playgirl centerfold, deadbeat dad?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/levi_child_support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/levi_child_support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Levi Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentines Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/01/22/levi_child_support</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bristol Palin goes to court to claim thousands she says her ex owes in child support]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Levi Johnston's been just about everywhere in the 13 months since his son, Tripp, was born: He's <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/08/11/levi_speaks/index.html">shit-talked</a> the&#160;Palin family to any and all media outlets, found his fame-whore soul mate in&#160;<a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/08/11/griffin_johnston/index.html">Kathy Griffin</a> and attained gay icon status (not to mention a <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/sexiest_man_living_2009/2009/11/17/levi_johnston/index.html">spot</a> on Salon's "Sexiest Man&#160;Living"&#160;countdown) by <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2009/09/03/levi_johnston/index.html">posing for Playgirl</a>. But there's one thing Johnston hasn't done this year, according to his ex, Bristol:&#160;paid his fair share of child support.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/levi_child_support/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/levi_child_support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free! Online! Plastic surgery consultations!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/plastic_surgery_website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/plastic_surgery_website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2010/01/21/plastic_surgery_website</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who needs real medical care when you could have doctors competing for your business on the Web?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who needs to go to the doctor when we have the Internet?&#160;These days, we diagnose ourselves on WebMD, buy prescription drugs from overseas pharmacies and do plastic surgery consultations, all at the click of a mouse. Shocked and horrified by that last item? So was I. But, in a story that I might have expected to see on The Onion, The&#160;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/fashion/21Skin.html?ref=fashion">New York&#160;Times</a> profiles a Web site that allows potential plastic surgery patients to post photos of themselves and a "brief medical&#160;history," along with descriptions of the procedures they're interested in. Then, <a href="http://surgeonhousecall.com/index.php">SurgeonHouseCalls.com</a>'s 55 doctors respond with recommendations and price quotes.</p><p>That's right.&#160;To review:&#160;This is a site where <em>certified physicians</em> <em>give medical advice and compete for the business of patients they've never seen</em>. Hippocratic Oath alert!</p><p>When&#160;I actually took a look at SurgeonHouseCalls, my disgust only grew. Among a sizable list of procedures categorized as "Asian&#160;Plastic Surgery," I read the site's <a href="http://surgeonhousecall.com/procedure_50/Skin_Whitening">sales pitch on skin whitening surgery</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/plastic_surgery_website/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/plastic_surgery_website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is &#8220;Mad Men&#8217;s&#8221; Christina Hendricks &#8220;big&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/christina_hendricks_nyt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/christina_hendricks_nyt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2010/01/20/christina_hendricks_nyt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we talk about when we talk about actress' weight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I&#160;spotted Gothamist's headline, <a href="http://gothamist.com/2010/01/19/post_131.php">"NYT&#160;Distorts Image of Christina Hendricks, Calls Her 'Big,'"</a> I&#160;involuntarily groaned. "Really, NY&#160;Times?" I&#160;thought. "Did you have to pull the combination weight-related low blow/Photoshop disaster on one of my favorite actresses?" And I wasn't alone. Bloggers at <a href="http://jezebel.com/5451976/you-dont-put-a-big-girl-in-a-big-dress-dissing-christina-hendricks">Jezebel</a> and <a href="http://flavorwire.com/63347/golden-globes-drama-mad-mens-christina-hendricks-vs-the-new-york-times">Flavorpill</a> echoed Gothamist's "WTF," lamenting that we can't discuss anything about the "Mad Men" actress but her curves and reminding us that the NY&#160;Times post's author, Cathy Horyn, who has her own <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/09/fashion/thursdaystyles/09THIN.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=1">history of weight issues</a>, could stand to be more sensitive about her descriptions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/christina_hendricks_nyt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/christina_hendricks_nyt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What should Conan O&#8217;Brien do next?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/08/open2010_conan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/08/open2010_conan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/2010/01/08/open2010_conan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He could accept NBC's midnight slot. But we have more exciting aspirations for the late-night funnyman]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thursday afternoon, word spread like wildfire that, come February, Jay Leno would be <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2010/01/07/jay-leno-nbc-conan-obrien-tonight-show/">resuming</a> his 11:30 time slot on&#160;NBC. Later, when the network issued a statement insisting (albeit vaguely) that they were "committed to keeping Conan O'Brien on&#160;NBC" and consensus seemed to form that a half-hour Leno show would bump O'Brien to midnight, we <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2010/01/08/jay_leno_shakeup">remained skeptical</a> of the plan. Why, we wondered, would someone with Conan's talent and appeal continue to play second banana to the likes of Leno?</p><p>And that's when we realized that, regardless of what happens with his show and Leno's, Conan needs a new gig. With that in mind, we asked our crack team of Open&#160;Salon&#160; critics, <a href="http://open.salon.com/blog/judy_berman/2010/01/07/open_call_what_should_conan_obrien_do_next">"What should Conan do next?"</a>&#160;Check out our favorite responses below -- and add your own to the Comments section.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/08/open2010_conan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/08/open2010_conan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Men&#8217;s rights&#8221; groups go mainstream</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/05/mens_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/05/mens_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/11/05/mens_rights</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2009/03/14/joyce_quiverfull/index.html">"Quiverfull"</a> author Kathryn Joyce interviewed blogger <a href="http://bernardchapin.com/">Bernard Chapin</a>, he insisted on addressing her as "Feminist E." You see, Joyce explains, "he never uses real names for feminists, who are wicked and who men 'must verbally oppose &#8230; until our flesh oxidizes into dust.'" Now, Chapin's slight isn't particularly unexpected coming from a voice in the "men's rights" movement, a loosely organized coalition of individuals and organizations that believe feminist-influenced society is oppressing men.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/05/mens_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/05/mens_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>155</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gossip Girl&#8221;: Threesome&#8217;s a crowd?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/gossip_girl_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/gossip_girl_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/11/04/gossip_girl</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parents Television Council takes the show to task for pushing porny sex ... without seeing the episode in question]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get ready for a brand new scandal, from the folks who brought us <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_XXXVIII_halftime_show_controversy">Nipplegate</a>. This time, conservative watchdog group the Parents Television Council is all atwitter about "Gossip&#160;Girl."&#160;Of course, the show has been raising parental eyebrows ever since its debut: It does, after all, feature a gaggle of rich, largely amoral teenagers who don't think twice about downing martinis and jumping into bed together. And the series has been on PTC's shit list <a href="http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/bw/2009/0206worst.asp">for a while</a>, with the organization claiming it "conveys the message that sex is a tool used to manipulate people."</p><p>Now, PTC&#160;has finally stumbled upon something it can really sink its teeth into. Those of you who have already seen the promo for next week's "Gossip&#160;Girl" episode (posted below) may remember that we've been promised a "3s0me." The ad shuffles through the (now mostly college-age) main characters' images like a slot machine, begging us to guess which trio will hook up. That's all we know about what's to come... and that seems to be all PTC&#160;knows, too.&#160;But that hasn't stopped them from writing a lengthy letter (<a href="http://news-briefs.ew.com/2009/11/03/parents-television-council-gossip-girl/">reproduced in full at EW.com</a>) to CW&#160;affiliates promising that there will be hell to pay if they air the episode in question.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/gossip_girl_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/gossip_girl_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politicizing a parent&#8217;s worst nightmare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/03/baby_rb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/03/baby_rb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/11/03/baby_rb</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple faces off in court over whether their gravely ill son should live or die. Is this a "right-to-life" issue?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Britain this week, a mother and father are squaring off in court. Although the couple is "amicably separated," their dispute has nothing to do with alimony or child custody. Their legal teams are battling over something much more difficult: whether the parents' 1-year-old son should live or die.</p><p>Over the weekend, the <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6898344.ece">Times of London</a> broke the story of two young parents who disagree on what the future should hold for their severely disabled child. Known in the press as Baby RB, for reasons of anonymity, the boy suffers from congenital myasthenic syndrome, "a rare genetic fault meaning his muscles are too weak for him to move his limbs effectively or breathe unaided." There is no cure for his illness, which has forced him to spend his entire life in the hospital and renders him unable to "move his limbs effectively or breathe unaided." Because he can't swallow, the boy must also endure painful lung-suction treatments every few hours.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/03/baby_rb/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/03/baby_rb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teen sex: a weighty issue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/02/sex_weight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/02/sex_weight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/11/02/sex_weight</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Race and body image have complex effects on high school girls' risk-taking behavior, a new study shows]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately, at Broadsheet, we've been writing a lot about the <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/13/designers_hate_fat/index.html">fashion industry</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2009/08/24/nude_model/index.html">glossy women's magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/21/models/index.html">plus-size models</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/09/lauren_photoshop/index.html">Photoshop disasters</a>. It's difficult to quantify the effects of Christian Louboutin's howling about Barbie dolls' cankles, on one hand, and Glamour's newfound (and likely temporary) commitment to showcasing models with a variety of body types on the other. But a <a href="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/124/5/e913">new study</a> hints at the impact such a weight-obsessed culture may be having on a particularly vulnerable demographic -- teenage girls.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/02/sex_weight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/02/sex_weight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lousy spouses anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/29/lousy_spouse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/29/lousy_spouse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/10/29/lousy_spouse</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Web site caters to men and women going through messy divorces]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you're getting a divorce. And it's not the amicable kind. You didn't talk it out over late-night coffee and come to the mature, mutual decision that your love just wasn't meant to last. Well, what now?</p><p>A new Web site is attempting to help spurned spouses figure it out. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/27/AR2009102703346.html?hpid=features1&amp;hpv=national&amp;sid=ST2009102803354">The Washington Post's Susan Kinzie</a> attended the launch party for <a href="http://www.lousyspouse.com/">LousySpouse.com</a>, an online community catering to men and women facing messy divorces. Founded by two women (one of whom wants to maintain anonymity and showed up at the event disguised in "a wig and pink sunglasses") who have been through the ringer themselves, the site is designed to combine emotional support with practical information. "One thing that kept popping up in both of our experiences was the inaccuracies and discrepancies in available information about the divorce industry," the women <a href="http://www.lousyspouse.com/about-us/">write</a>. "From lawyers to mediators to friends and neighbors there is a glaring lack of reliable advice."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/29/lousy_spouse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/29/lousy_spouse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Seventeen teaching transphobia?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/seventeen_transphobic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/seventeen_transphobic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/10/28/seventeen_transphobic</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LGBT activists are up in arms about the magazine's story, "My boyfriend turned out to be a girl"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think your daughter is learning from Seventeen magazine? Self-esteem? Hopefully. Body hatred? Perhaps. How to buy a flattering winter coat or strike up a conversation with that hottie from homeroom? Most likely. I'll forgive you for not guessing "transphobia." But that may be exactly what teen and tween girls are getting out of a troubling Seventeen article called "My <em>boyfriend</em> turned out to be a girl!"</p><p>The piece, posted as a PDF at <a href="http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=13730">Pam's House Blend</a>, begins innocently enough. Narrator "Sheri"&#160;(who told her story to Senior Editor Jessica Press) recounts the beginnings of her relationship with "Derek," in which a misdirected text message led to marathon phone conversations and, finally, a first date. "He revealed that he wore bandages around his chest because of a basketball injury," writes Press. "When we made out, he never let me see him with his shirt off or touch me 'below the belt.'" Still,&#160;Sheri fell in love, and their relationship lasted through Christmas break of Derek's first year of college, when it dissolved over suspicions of infidelity.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/seventeen_transphobic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/seventeen_transphobic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
