<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Julia Scott</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/julia_scott/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pesticides indicted in bee deaths</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/bees_pesticides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/bees_pesticides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 10:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/environment/feature/2009/05/18/bees_pesticides</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agriculture officials have renewed their scrutiny of the world's best-selling pest-killer as they try to solve the mysterious collapse of the nation's hives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene Brandi will always rue the summer of 2007. That's when the California beekeeper rented half his honeybees, or 1,000 hives, to a watermelon farmer in the San Joaquin Valley at pollination time. The following winter, 50 percent of Brandi's bees were dead. "They pretty much disappeared," says Brandi, who's been keeping bees for 35 years.</p><p>Since the advent in 2006 of <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/05/29/missing_bees/index.html">colony collapse disorder</a>, the mysterious ailment that continues to decimate hives across the country, Brandi has grown accustomed to seeing up to 40 percent of his bees vanish each year, simply leave the hive in search of food and never come back. But this was different. Instead of losing bees from all his colonies, Brandi watched the ones that skipped watermelon duty continue to thrive.</p><p>Brandi discovered the watermelon farmer had irrigated his plants with imidacloprid, the world's best-selling insecticide created by <a href="http://www.bayercropscience.com/BCSWeb/CropProtection.nsf/id/imidacloprid_se.htm?open&amp;l=EN&amp;ccm=200020010">Bayer CropScience Inc.</a>, one of the world's leading producers of pesticides and genetically modified vegetable seeds, with annual sales of $8.6 billion. Blended with water and applied to the soil, imidacloprid creates a moist mixture the bees likely drank from on a hot day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/bees_pesticides/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/bees_pesticides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The world just fell out from under me&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/16/clark_22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/16/clark_22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/06/16/clark</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eight-year-old Devon Clark developed Asperger's syndrome after repeated exposure to mercury-based preservative thimerosal -- and his mom became an activist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early in 2003, Lujene Clark noticed that her 8-year-old son, Devon, was acting up more than he ever had. He had emotional outbursts, stopped responding to simple commands, and became extremely sensitive to noises and smells. When the family shopped at Wal-Mart, Devon would throw a tantrum, or race around, slapping his hands together. "He used to be the best-behaved child in a restaurant, but now we couldn't take him inside one -- the clattering of dishes was too much for him," Clark says. "He would start to scream. It was like a nightmare we couldn't wake up from." </p><p>That September, a neurophysiologist diagnosed Devon with Asperger's syndrome, a mental disorder related to autism, which affects children's social and communication development. But when Clark researched Asperger's on the Internet, she was shocked to learn something she hadn't heard in the physician's office. Some studies had found a correlation between Asperger's, autism and vaccinations containing the mercury-based preservative thimerosal. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/06/16/clark_22/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/16/clark_22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans: Do something about Darfur</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/01/darfur_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/01/darfur_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/06/01/darfur</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contrary to Bush administration policy, Americans overwhelmingly support U.S. action to stop the genocide.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since terming the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/05/17/darfur/index.html" target="blank">ongoing scorched-earth campaign</a> against civilians in Darfur genocide several years ago, the Bush administration has done everything it can to avoid committing to substantial intervention in the region, even <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/archive.html?blog=/politics/war_room/2005/05/06/darfur/index.html" target="blank">downplaying</a> the number of dead. But a <a href="http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?l=1&id=3492" target="blank">new poll</a> by the International Crisis Group/Zogby International indicates that Americans overwhelmingly support U.S. action in Darfur to stop the genocide. </p><p>Over 80 percent of respondents said the U.S. should use its military assets to bolster African Union troops on the ground in Darfur, should impose tough sanctions on the leaders who control the Janjaweed, and establish a no-fly zone over Darfur (air bombings on Darfuri villages continue unabated, according to reports). 80 percent also believed the war against civilians constitutes genocide. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/06/01/darfur_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/01/darfur_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is what democracy looks like?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/27/egypt_11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/27/egypt_11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egyptian Protests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/27/egypt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President and Mrs. Bush miss an opportunity to promote democratic reform in Egypt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bush administration is likely to portray Wednesday's referendum in Egypt, in which voters officially approved President Hosni Mubarak's plans to hold the first competitive presidential elections later this year, as a victory for democracy. But several opposition groups boycotted the vote, since the only candidates allowed to compete in the election will be handpicked by the government. </p><p>Outside polling stations Wednesday in Cairo, pro-democracy demonstrators were attacked by policemen and hired government thugs. "Women were surrounded, groped and had their clothes torn," wrote a <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-egypt26may26,0,3258752.story?coll=la-home-headlines" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a> reporter on the scene. "Some demonstrators were thrown down flights of concrete stairs, dragged by their hair and kicked by swarms of young men." </p><p>President Bush denounced the attacks on Thursday. "The idea of people expressing themselves in opposition to the government, then getting beaten, is not our view of how a democracy ought to work," he said. But the administration squandered a chance to make its case for real democratic reform during a recent visit to Egypt by Laura Bush, who strongly endorsed Mubarak. The First Lady said Mubarak had taken "a bold step," with this week's referendum, but emphasized that "each step is a small step, [and] you can't be quick." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/27/egypt_11/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/27/egypt_11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the polls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/25/poll_27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/25/poll_27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/25/poll</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New numbers today on Americans' attitudes about abortion, the judicial filibuster, and Bush -- and they don't look great for the right wing or the president.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Connecticut's Quinnipiac University released a <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x11385.xml?ReleaseID=738" target="_blank">new poll</a> this morning surveying Americans' attitudes on abortion, the filibuster fight, and the Bush presidency. The numbers don't look great for the right wing or the White House. </p><p>By 63 to 33 percent, Americans support the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, with men supporting it at a higher rate (68 to 28 percent) than women (58 to 37 percent). </p><p>For all the rhetoric from the religious right about "outrage" over the filibuster compromise, the poll revealed that opinions about the nuclear option divided along party lines, with Republicans against the filibuster 48 to 39 percent, and Democrats supporting its use by 70 to 23 percent. Independent voters, meanwhile, backed the use of the filibuster by a margin of 54 to 39 percent. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/25/poll_27/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/25/poll_27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shunning the science-based community</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/24/stem_cells_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/24/stem_cells_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/24/stem_cells</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contrary to popular wisdom, the Bush White House continues to dispute the promise of embryonic stem-cell research.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The House is likely to defy President Bush's wishes and pass a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5028607,00.html" target="_blank">hotly debated bill</a> that would reverse the president's ban on embryonic stem cells harvested after 2001. If the legislation also passes in the Senate in the coming weeks, Bush has threatened to veto it, which would be the first veto of his tenure. </p><p>The bill has set off another round of inflammatory rhetoric from the far right. Republican House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas said a vote for the bill would be a "vote to fund with taxpayer dollars the dismemberment of living, distinct human beings for the purposes of medical experimentation." </p><p>There's the far-right religious view, and there's the more mainstream scientific one. After last week's announcement that South Korean researchers had succeeded in cloning human embryos to create patient-specific lines of stem cells, many lawmakers believe that the U.S. is failing to pursue crucial new technology in the race to cure devastating diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. "How many more lives must be ended or ravaged?" asked Democratic Rep. Carolyn Maloney of New York, according to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/24/politics/24cnd-stem.html?hp&ex=1116993600&en=f807a6d4937072b0&ei=5094&partner=homepage" target="_blank">New York Times</a>. "How much more unimaginable suffering must be endured until government gives researchers the wherewithal to simply do their jobs?" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/24/stem_cells_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/24/stem_cells_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Supreme Court re-enters the abortion debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/23/supreme_court_19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/23/supreme_court_19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/23/supreme_court</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a surprise move, the Supreme Court agrees to consider a parental notification case with implications for the constitutionality of abortion laws.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a further sign that the outcome of the controversy over President Bush's judicial nominees has serious consequences for Americans, the Supreme Court on Monday <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/23/AR2005052300599.html" target="_blank">agreed</a> to review a case on abortion notification laws that could make it even harder for minors to get abortions. The case, "Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood," is part of an acrimonious battle over abortion rights that has escalated in anticipation of Chief Justice Rehnquist's retirement. </p><p>New Hampshire state officials are appealing a November 2004 ruling by the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which found the state's parental notification law unconstitutional because it did not provide an exception for cases in which the health of the mother is in danger. (Most states that have parental notification laws do include such exceptions.) In its consideration of the Planned Parenthood case this fall, it's possible the Supreme Court could narrow the circumstances under which a judge might allow a minor to bypass notification laws for health reasons. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/23/supreme_court_19/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/23/supreme_court_19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A deficit of historic proportions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/20/deficit_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/20/deficit_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/20/deficit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the U.S. headed for a major economic crisis on the scale of Argentina's in 2001?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. has already spent $320 billion on all military operations since September 11, 2001, according to a Congressional Research Service analysis -- nearly as much as the $350 billion (adjusted for inflation) spent on the Korean war effort. The fighting is "lasting longer, and is more intense, and the cost to keep troops in the theater of operations is proving to be much greater than anyone anticipated," wrote Democratic Rep. John Spratt of South Carolina in a recent report, according to the <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0519/p01s03-usmi.html" target="_blank">Christian Science Monitor</a>. Not only does the war in Iraq grow more expensive by the month, the cost of materials and maintenance increases the longer that the fighting is sustained. How high will the cost go? According to the Congressional Budget Office, possibly as high as $600 billion by 2010, if operations continue at the same rate. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/20/deficit_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/20/deficit_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.S. military&#8217;s personnel woes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/19/military_woes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/19/military_woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/19/military_woes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From desertions to a range of recruiting problems, the Army finds itself fighting a P.R. campaign on multiple fronts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> With U.S. soldiers continuing to get wounded and killed in Iraq, military recruiters have seen the number of young people willing to risk their lives overseas <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_r oom/2005/05/03/recruits/index.html" target="_blank">decline</a>. On top of which, troops are <a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/low_res/story.jsp?story=638635&host=3&d ir=70" target="_blank">going AWOL</a> -- 5,133 at the Pentagon's last count -- while thousands more, according to a report in the UK Independent, are calling the GI Rights Hotline every month for advice on how to leave the Army. And this week, members of the Realignment and Closure Commission told Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that the Pentagon's intended base closures will <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-05-16-closures_x.htm?POE=click-refer" target="_blank">put a further dent</a> in recruitment. Consolidating National Guard and Reserve members onto fewer bases, some of which are located in remote locations, could create longer commuting times for part-time soldiers, which would make recruiting more difficult, Commissioner James Bilbray said, according to USA Today. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/19/military_woes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/19/military_woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Funding the faith-based community</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/18/funding_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/18/funding_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/18/funding</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Bush's abstinence-only education spending spree is coming under fresh scrutiny this week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> President Bush's abstinence-only education <a href="http://archive.salon.com/news/feature/2004/02/24/abstinence/" target="_blank">spending spree</a> is coming under fresh scrutiny this week; the American Civil Liberties Union announced it is <a href="http://www.timesargus.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050517/NEWS/50 5170365/1002/NEWS01" target="_blank ">suing</a> the federal government for giving more than $1 million in faith-based funding to <a href="http://www.silverringthing.com/" target="_blank">Silver Ring Thing</a>, a program that encourages teens to take abstinence pledges. The ACLU says the program has used the fed funding to preach about God, hand out Bibles and give teens a silver ring inscribed with Scripture to symbolize their chastity vow. Over 30,000 teens in the U.S., Britain and South Africa have taken the pledge, and program founder Denny Pattyn has vowed to put two million rings on teens' fingers by 2010. ("We don't ever want to take the gospel out of our message because we believe the power for abstinence is a changed heart," Pattyn has said.) </p><p>The group's message obliterates any separation between church and state, said Carol Rose, Executive Director of the ACLU of Massachusetts, in a statement: "The Silver Ring Thing is nothing more than a vehicle for converting young people to Christianity. Our taxpayer dollars should play no part in such a program." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/18/funding_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/18/funding_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;There&#8217;s just no way I can walk away&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/17/darfur_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/17/darfur_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/05/17/darfur</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A professor urges action on Darfur, saying the U.S. should be embarrassed about declaring the violence genocide while doing so little to stop it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As southern Sudan enjoys the first fruits of peace from the comprehensive treaty it signed with the Khartoum government on Jan. 9, ending a 21-year civil war, hundreds of civilians continue to die violently on a daily basis in Sudan's western region of Darfur. The situation in Darfur exploded in February 2003 after the Islamic regime disarmed insurgent African groups and left weapons in the hands of Arab militias, which it then hired to control the insurgency. The Arab militias began slaughtering and raping Darfuri civilians and razing their villages, displacing 2 million people and creating an untold humanitarian crisis. </p><p>In July 2004, Congress led the world in unanimously declaring the violence in Darfur a genocide, as the Bush administration also subsequently did. And Congress is considering the Darfur Accountability Act, which would take strong steps against the Khartoum regime and provide support for the meager African Union monitoring force that is now in Darfur. </p><p>But <a href="/politics/war_room/2005/05/06/darfur/index.html">recent media reports</a> suggest the Bush administration may be backing off its earlier genocide determination, and even trying to neuter the Darfur Accountability Act. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/17/darfur_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/17/darfur_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wing GOP&#8217;s alien views on immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/immigration_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/immigration_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/13/immigration</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The battle over immigration reform continues on Capitol Hill.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Barely had the bipartisan Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act of 2005 been introduced in Congress on Thursday when Republican Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado, a strong proponent of prosecuting illegal immigrants to the full extent of current law, attacked the bill as a form of amnesty. "There might be a little more lipstick on this pig than there was before," he said, according to the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/12/AR2005051201559.html" target="_blank">Washington Post,</a> "but it is most certainly the same old pig. Time and time again, history has shown us that amnesty actually increases illegal immigration." </p><p>Proponents of the bill say it's nothing of the sort. Introduced by Sens. John McCain and Ted Kennedy, the legislation would enable illegal workers to apply for a three-year work visa, and later apply for a three-year extension and a green card. Eventually, they could get in the "back of the line," as McCain has termed it, to apply for citizenship. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/immigration_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/immigration_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The military environmental complex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/dod_pollutes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/dod_pollutes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/13/dod_pollutes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon is pressing for more exemptions from federal environmental regulations. Are soldiers and their families among those paying the price?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The U.S. military isn't just <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/13/national/13cnd-bases.html?hp&ex=1116043200&en=e95668e8b2a5a11e&ei=5094&partner=homepage" target="_blank">shutting down</a> scores of military bases, it's also making quite a few of them toxic -- and wants to make the mess somebody else's problem. The Defense Department, the nation's single largest polluter, is now seeking <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/11/politics/11enviro.html?ex=1116475200&en=23bc4bdd4279deac&ei=5070" target="_blank">major exemptions</a> to the Clean Air Act, the Superfund law and a host of other health regulations, to giver it freer rein with training exercises. The Pentagon already secured amendments to the Endangered Species Act in 2003 under the same premise. </p><p>The military's justification for the changes sought today -- that environmental liabilities undermine training operations, even more of a detriment with the nation at war -- seems a long way from a declaration made by Dick Cheney at a meeting between environmentalists and the Pentagon during the Persian Gulf crisis in 1990. "Defense and the environment is not an either-or proposition," said Cheney, who served as secretary of defense at the time. "To choose between them is impossible in this real world of serious defense threats and genuine environmental concerns. The real choice is whether we are going to build a new environmental ethic into the daily business of defense." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/dod_pollutes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/dod_pollutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A different kind of filibuster nightmare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/12/idol_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/12/idol_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/12/idol</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haunted by "American Idol," one conservative offers her vision of the nuclear option.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The filibuster wars must be getting to Concerned Women for America, a conservative group backing the so-called nuclear option that will push through President Bush's judicial nominees. Its Chief Counsel, Jan LaRue, wrote on Thursday that she had a filibuster-related nightmare about an episode of "American Idol," in which panelists Paula Abdul, Randy Jackson and Simon Cowell were replaced by the menacing Democratic senators Ted Kennedy, Charles Schumer and Harry Reid. Apparently the three were judging a singing performance by Frank Sinatra. In the haunting vision, the mean ol' judges won't cut Sinatra a break -- let alone allow the audience a vote. </p><p>"REID: Why is Fox picking a fight by sending us contestants like this? Why are they refusing to move on to less controversial contestants? They want to make us look like obstructionists. We know the difference between opposing contestants and blocking contestants. We will oppose bad contestants but we will only block unacceptable contestants. They won't send us any new contestants because the president of Fox doesn't want to give us a chance to demonstrate that we are reasonable. He's just giving a big wet kiss to Italians on the far right. This is about checks and balances. I'm feeling unbalanced. I need to step away from the precipice before I'm swayed. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/12/idol_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/12/idol_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The gospel of Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/10/chandler2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/10/chandler2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/10/chandler2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has Chan Chandler, the Baptist pastor who banished nine members from his North Carolina church for failing to support President Bush, seen the error of his ways?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Chan Chandler, the Baptist pastor who recently <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_r oom/2005/05/06/faith/index.html" target="_blank">banished nine congregants from his North Carolina church</a> for their failure to support President Bush, appeared to change his gospel this past weekend. He told the Associated Press that the incident was a "great misunderstanding," and invited the excommunicated members -- who say they were booted for supporting John Kerry last fall -- back into the church for Sunday services. According to <a href="http://www.oxfordpress.com/business/content/shared/news/world/stories/ 05/09_PARTISAN_CHURCH.html" target="_blank">Cox News Service,</a> on Sunday Chandler apparently preached reconciliation, urging congregants to "love on each other" -- which everyone apparently then did, "circulating for about five minutes, shaking hands and hugging." </p><p>According to the AP, over the weekend Chandler also denied ever having enforced guidelines from a partisan pulpit. "No one has ever been voted from the membership of this church due to an individual's support or lack of support for a political party or candidate," he said in a statement through his lawyer. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/10/chandler2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/10/chandler2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Not on my watch&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/06/darfur_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/06/darfur_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/06/darfur</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the world commemorated the millions of victims of the Nazis on Thursday, Congress squandered an opportunity to address the ongoing genocide in Darfur.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Thursday was Holocaust Remembrance Day, but while the world commemorated the millions of victims of the Nazis, Congress squandered an opportunity to address the ongoing genocide in Darfur. The House passed President Bush's emergency $82 billion supplemental spending bill without several provisions from the <a href="http://www.americanprogressaction.org/site/pp.asp?c=klLWJcP7H&b=667549 #7">Darfur Accountability Act</a> that were supposed to be included. Introduced with strong bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate, the act would have taken the strongest stance against the Khartoum regime's continuing attacks on civilians since the unanimous passage of the Sudan Peace Act of 2002, in which Congress declared that "the acts of the Government of Sudan constitute genocide as defined by the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/06/darfur_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/06/darfur_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dropping the Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/05/hammer_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/05/hammer_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/05/hammer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Between weeks of bad press and a grass-roots email campaign, Tom DeLay is losing some corporate friends.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's legal defense fund has been <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/archive.html?blog=/politics/war _room/2005/04/08/delay_defense/index.html" target="_blank">drying up</a> of late, due to dwindling contributions from citizens, government leaders and corporations who once rallied around him. No doubt major media coverage of DeLay's various ethics violations has played a part; American Progress Action Fund's "Drop the Hammer" campaign, targeting five of DeLay's corporate supporters, has also helped drain the coffers of his Legal Expense Trust. </p><p>Launched last month, the campaign generated more than 200,000 emails to the companies, and on Wednesday the group <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/index.php?p=802" target="_blank">announced</a> that three of the corporations -- American Airlines, Verizon, and Nissan North America -- have written DeLay off. </p><p>"We congratulate these companies for responding to the public's concern and taking a positive step towards restoring confidence in an ethical government," John Podesta, the group's president, said in a statement. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/05/hammer_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/05/hammer_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The battle over recruiting on campus</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/03/anti_recruit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/03/anti_recruit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/05/03/anti_recruit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court will now decide whether universities have a right to shut out military recruiters, without risking their federal funding.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The Pentagon's <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_room/2005/05/03/recruits/index.html" target="_blank">recruitment woes</a> continue -- and they could get worse, depending on a case now before the Supreme Court. On Monday, the nation's top justices agreed to hear a case that could allow universities to bar military recruiters from their campuses without the threat of losing federal funding. </p><p>Last November, a coalition of law schools challenged the Solomon Amendment -- which permits the government to withhold funding from schools that deny recruiters access -- by invoking the right not to "associate" with people linked to the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. The schools argued the policy was anti-gay and conflicted with their own non-discrimination guidelines. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, and issued an injunction barring the government from enforcing the amendment. The Defense Department appealed the ruling, along with another ruling in February, in which Yale University's law school won the right to bar recruiters from their campus for the same reason. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/03/anti_recruit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/03/anti_recruit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They can&#8217;t drill fast enough</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/29/blm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/29/blm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/04/29/blm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alaska's ANWR is getting all the attention, but under Bush &#038; Co., energy companies can hardly keep up with all the drilling opportunities from sea to shining sea.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Congress draws closer to passing budget legislation that includes a provision for opening Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, other, less publicized federal lands are being drilled for gas and oil at an unprecedented rate. The Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/27/AR2005 042701946.html" target="_blank">reported</a> late this week that parts of the Rocky Mountain West are now so exposed to industry exploitation that the number of drilling permits issued by the Bureau of Land Management has outpaced the amount of equipment and manpower available to take advantage of them. </p><p>That contradicts longstanding claims by the energy industry that restrictive federal regulations have prevented them from getting at America's abundant natural gas deposits. Last year, Big Energy's best friend in Washington, Vice President Dick Cheney decried the fact that "large parts of the Rocky Mountain West are off limits." The BLM proceeded to issue an unprecedented number of drilling permits last year, which continues apace, in spite of energy companies' inability to keep up. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/04/29/blm/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/29/blm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ken Doll with a 12-gauge?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/29/delay_27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/29/delay_27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/04/29/delay</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom DeLay gets a makeover -- but is it a little too extreme?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a difference a few weeks can make. In early April, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay was buried in a pileup of ethics allegations, and smarting from a backlash over his comments about judges in the Terri Schiavo case. We felt his public image could use a little buffing, so we asked <a href="http://archive.salon.com/news/feature/2005/04/08/image/" target="_blank">two image consultants</a> to suggest ways to re-make Tom DeLay, top to tails. </p><p>Diane Parente, president of Image Development and Management, based in Ross, Calif., had some tips for DeLay at the time. "I would get rid of the [hair] gel," she said. Parente thought he was "very sloppy looking" and needed to "convey a more sincere attitude and watch the expression on his mouth, which looks like a frown." She also suggested he consider an eyelift because his "heavy lids" made him look "cynical." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/04/29/delay_27/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/29/delay_27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
