<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Kaitlin Quistgaard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/kaitlin_quistgaard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Making television matter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/15/worldlink/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/15/worldlink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2001/06/15/worldlink</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everybody talks about interactive TV -- global TV pioneers Kim Spencer and Evelyn Messinger are doing something about it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We tune in as Deborah Whitley, a Washington high school teacher, and Sima Daad, an English teacher in Tehran, Iran, meet via satellite videoconferencing. The two women chat about everything from the books they teach to the role of women in their countries; they introduce their families; and, more than once over the course of four days of dialogue, they politely suggest taking a break before a heated moment boils over. We're privy to this conversation -- an oddly intimate, public meeting that animates the deep-seated disagreements and mutual misperceptions of two nations -- thanks to the efforts of Kim Spencer, who co-produced the program for PBS in 1998, and now airs it and similarly provocative programming on the American satellite station he founded, <a target="new">WorldLink TV.</a> </p><p> Whitley eventually gets up her nerve to ask Daad about <a href="/books/int/1999/04/16/rushdie/">Salman Rushdie:</a> "I would like you to explain how that death sentence was given to him." </p><p> "We don't allow some person pretending to be creative to insult and make fun of our principles." says Daad. "He has to be punished because of the insult." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/15/worldlink/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/15/worldlink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Isabel Allende</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/05/allende_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/05/allende_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2001 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/conv/2001/03/05/allende</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her books don't get edited, she says Latin lovers make lousy husbands and her daughter's pornographic letters are a great read.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isabel Allende may be a little in love with the risqu&eacute;. She celebrated her 50th birthday by publishing a reverie on aphrodisiacs, complete with her mother's erotic recipes. She confesses to a fantasy of swimming in rice pudding: "I dived in, and that delicious creaminess caressed my skin, slipped into all the crevices of my body, filled my mouth." She tells me that she has read her daughter's love letters and that they are "pornographic" and "wonderful." </p><p>Certainly, the Chilean writer, who stormed onto the literary scene nearly two decades ago with the magic realist hit <a target="new" href="http://www.isabelallende.com/house_spirits_frame.htm">"The House of the Spirits,"</a> does not stifle concupiscence. Her novels abound with secret basement love nests, illicit couples tiptoeing through snoring houses and aching for a hidden corner and the repeated rape of servant girls by a desirous patron. New York Times reviewer Michiko Kakutani derided Allende's most recent novel, "Daughter of Fortune," as a "bodice-ripper romance"; <a target="new" href="http://www.isabelallende.com">Allende</a> says her readers were outraged that there wasn't more action. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/03/05/allende_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/05/allende_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MasterCard vs. Ralph Nader</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/17/nader_mastercard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/17/nader_mastercard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/business/feature/2000/08/17/nader_mastercard</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could a consumer advocate's bid for the presidency be derailed by a credit card company?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently there are some things money can't buy, including a sense of humor. How else to explain MasterCard's decision to sue Ralph Nader and his presidential campaign for $15 million for running a biting political ad on TV? </p><p>The Nader ad is a flagrant parody of what MasterCard refers to as its "famous and renowned 'Priceless' advertising campaign" -- the ads that tempt us with such intangibles as "a day where all you have to do is breathe" followed by the word "priceless," and then drives home our addiction to consumerism with the tag line "There are some things money can't buy, for everything else there's MasterCard." </p><p>The <a target="new" href="http://www.votenader.com/media/pricelesstruth.html">Nader ad</a> puts a silly spin, reminiscent of the old "Saturday Night Live," on the concept, by showing George W. Bush enjoying a meal as the voice-over intones: "grilled tenderloin for fundraiser, $1,000 a plate;" then Al Gore takes center stage as the voice asserts: "campaign ads filled with half-truths, $10 million;" and then we go back to a Bush shot as the voice informs us: "promises to special interest groups, over $10 billion." The tag line is "There are some things money can't buy. Without Ralph Nader in the presidential debates, the truth will come in last." Nader is arguing that with his paltry <a target="new" href="http://www.opensecrets.org/2000elect/index/AllCands.htm">$945,219</a> in campaign contributions (compared to, say, Bush's $93 million), he can't buy enough TV air time to get on voters' radar and therefore into the debates. Of course, the ad could backfire big time; if MasterCard wins the suit, the campaign coffers will be emptied many times over. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/17/nader_mastercard/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/17/nader_mastercard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court to Napster: You&#8217;re going down</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/27/napster_hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/27/napster_hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2000 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2000/07/27/napster_hearing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The judge vents her wrath on the Napster "monster" and closes the music-swapping service -- for now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of Friday at midnight PDT, <a href="http://www.napster.com/" target="new">Napster</a> must shut down -- or find some way to prevent its 20 million users from trading any songs copyrighted by the 18 record companies suing the MP3-swapping service for copyright infringement. This was the order of U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel, who on Wednesday granted the recording industry the preliminary injunction it was looking for, after poking holes in Napster's arguments throughout a tense two-hour hearing. </p><p>"It's pretty much acknowledged by Napster that this is infringement, because of the users' agreement which implies infringement and by statements made in their own documents," Patel said, in explaining her ruling -- which, barring last-minute legal maneuvering or reversal between now and Friday, will remain in effect until she reaches a final decision in the case. The "statements" she refers to are early e-mail messages written by Napster's teenage founder Shawn Fanning and others who helped build the business, touting their software as a way to get your favorite songs. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/27/napster_hearing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/27/napster_hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ll have the Priceline Pot-Stickers!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/26/venture_frogs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/26/venture_frogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2000 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/07/26/venture_frogs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a new San Francisco restaurant, dot-coms are on the menu.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over dinner the other night, we were confronted by the craziest outbreak of dot-com mania yet -- <a target="new" href="http://www.vfrogs.com/restaurant/menu.html">the menu.</a> Akamai Chicken Pineapple Fried Rice? Inktomi Asia Burger? Business 2.0 Bok Choy? </p><p>Yep. It's not exactly New York's <a target="new" href="http://www.cuisinenet.com/cnet/new_york/menu/850.shtml">Carnegie Deli,</a> which honors the Great White Way with monster sandwiches like "The Egg and Oy!" (chicken salad and boiled egg), "Fifty Ways to Love Your Liver (try chopped!)," "Nova on Sunday" or the "Woody Allen" ("lotsa corned beef, plus lotsa pastrami"). But the new Venture Frogs Restaurant, tucked into a corner of what was once an ornately tiled Cadillac showroom in San Francisco, may be the only place where tourists can actually bite into Silicon Valley culture. </p><p>"Each menu item pays tribute to a company that we believe has helped shape the Internet start-up world to what it is today," says the reverential menu -- written by a pair of Netheads who <a target="new" href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-334982.html?pt.salon">sold</a> their first start-up to Microsoft for $250 million in 1998. Tony Hsieh, 26, and Alfred Lin, 27, two of the founders of LinkExchange, left Microsoft to start <a target="new" href="http://www.vfrogs.com/vfrogs/">Venture Frogs,</a> an investment firm and Internet incubator. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/26/venture_frogs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/26/venture_frogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With friends like these &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/21/scour_net/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/21/scour_net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2000 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/07/21/scour_net</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Napster redux: Another online media-swapper gets sued by the entertainment industry, even as it is taking meetings with Hollywood giants.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think Elvis is all shook up that people are listening to his music online and BMG Music isn't making even more money off a man who's been dead since 1977? Well, the Recording Industry of America (<a target="new" href="http://www.riaa.com/">RIAA</a>) and the Motion Picture Association of America (<a target="new" href="http://www.mpaa.org/home.htm">MPAA</a>) sure are. </p><p>On Thursday, the two powerful entertainment industry lobbying groups, plus the National Music Publishers Association, jointly filed a <a target="new" href="http://www.mpaa.org/Press/ScourComplaint.htm">lawsuit</a> against the multimedia search engine <a target="new" href="http://www.scour.com/">Scour,</a> contending that the company is "built around the large-scale theft of copyrighted material and trafficking of stolen works." The suit cites the use of Scour to illegally trade digital versions of movies like "The Perfect Storm," "The Patriot" and "Mission: Impossible 2," and popular music, including such <a target="new" href="http://www.mpaa.org/Press/default.HTM">oldies</a> as "Zip A Dee Do Dah," the Grateful Dead's "Truckin'," Jimi Hendrix's "Foxy Lady" and quite a few Elvis numbers. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/21/scour_net/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/21/scour_net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Put Mom through, but not that marketing VP!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/18/microsoft_agent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/18/microsoft_agent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2000 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/07/18/microsoft_agent</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you want an e-mail-reading software agent deciding who can interrupt you?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you're swamped with more e-mail than you can possibly read, what do you open: a silly poem from your new love or a message from your boss brimming with details about the meeting you have in one hour? Do you think a note from your mother is important enough to interrupt your work on that white paper? </p><p>These are the kinds of questions Microsoft could make us consider with its "Attentional User Interface," which John Markoff <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/07/biztech/articles/17lab.html">wrote</a> about in the New York Times on Monday. The goal of this artificial intelligence software, which Markoff says is "at the heart" of Microsoft's new <a href="/tech/col/rose/2000/06/30/microsoft_dotnet/index.html">.Net</a> strategy, is to cut down on information overload; a machine will screen your messages and only interrupt you if it deems the e-mail -- or its sender -- worthy of your time. That way, you can keep your head down and work without distraction! </p><p>Sure, e-mail overload is ugly, but do we really want to entrust decisions about who can reach us to an intelligent agent? I assume we'd have to set up a profile to teach this agent who matters to us, and then head to the shrink's office to come to work through the guilt after ranking the priority-level of messages from our colleagues, our friends, our family. Sorry Mom, that hot stock tip beats you hands down! </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/18/microsoft_agent/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/18/microsoft_agent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cell hell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/10/cell_rage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/10/cell_rage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/07/10/cell_rage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is Virgin Atlantic  thinking, inviting cellphones to invade the last vestige of chatter-free space?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>magine being locked up with a deal-making venture capitalist who's jabbering so intently into his phone that you can't even get him to put up his tray-table so you can escape to the bathroom. Besides, it's pointless to flee; you can't really get away from the chatter because everyone else in your tin prison is cellphone dependent. This might be your idea of hell, but it's <a href="/wlust/feature/1998/12/cov_10feature.html ">Richard Branson's</a> idea of luxury service. </p><p>We groaned last week when we heard about Virgin Atlantic Airways' <a href="/business/feature/2000/07/07/virgin/index.html">plans</a> for "Earth Calling," a service that will let mobile-phone users receive calls while traversing the globe -- a service that could eliminate one of the last oases of unconnected time. </p><p>After all, about the only good thing about flying is having a block of uninterrupted hours, during which you can't be reached by phone or e-mail -- or anything. It's the only time some people actually <i>read</i> books or, on international flights, get a full night's sleep. Imagine how hard it will be to rest when your seatmates are loudly conducting business around you at all hours. Look forward to being sandwiched between a start-up entrepreneur interviewing marketing VP candidates and a socialite recounting the gossip from last weekend in the Hamptons. VC phone home! Will you have to pay extra to be seated in a cellphone-free row? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/10/cell_rage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/10/cell_rage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free to be P-to-P</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/06/alphabet_soup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/06/alphabet_soup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2000 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/07/06/alphabet_soup</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Napster is a peer-to-peer? The tech sector is drowning in an alphabet soup of meaningless acronyms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attention Napster fans: Are you aware that when you trade songs on computers you're engaged in the hottest new business model to pique venture capitalists' interest? Yep, according to the Wall Street Journal, the "latest tech fad" turned buzzword is P-to-P, or peer-to-peer. You know, your computer talks to my computer and we share information without going through a middleman server anywhere. OK, we dumped the middleman, but God, don't let us lose anything else: You wouldn't want to be a participant in this "hot space" and be referred to as "just another PP." </p><p>We could have predicted that the tech sector would reduce a hip music lover's service to vaporous jargon. First there was B-to-C (business-to-consumer), although no one really started calling those companies anything more complicated than e-commerce sites or "e-tailers" until the big B-to-B craze kicked in. (That's business-to-business.) Then the abbreviation mania accelerated, driving business plan scribes to reduce their company descriptions to single-letter catch phrases that defy comprehension. "My B-to-B is gonna eat your P-to-P!" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/06/alphabet_soup/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/06/alphabet_soup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kill Mister Paperclip!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/22/paperclip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/22/paperclip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/06/22/paperclip</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Microsoft prepares to unveil its next-generation software, we offer a few gentle suggestions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Dear Mssrs. Gates and Ballmer: </p><p>We hope that this missive finds you in good spirits, perhaps celebrating Judge Jackson's decision to <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/06/biztech/articles/21soft.html ">postpone</a> any forced behavior modifications until another round of judges can examine the whole antitrust case. Surely, you're delighted that this good news should be delivered just as a sea of analysts and reporters <a target="new" href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/423257.asp">arrive</a> on your doorstep to hear about your "Next Generation Windows Services." </p><p>We thought this cheery moment might be a good one in which to make a few requests for Microsoft's new "Internet-based platform" you'll be discussing Thursday. You see, we find quite a number of features in your software to be really quite annoying. </p><p>Let's start with the Office Assistant, that animated paperclip that inhabits Microsoft Word; it tries to guess what you're doing, but always gets it wrong -- and then winks at you anyway. Around our office, our system administrators periodically receive a message from a fellow staffer that says something like: </p><p>"I have to figure out how to KILL THE PAPERCLIP GUY that keeps popping up." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/22/paperclip/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/22/paperclip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;AllThePornYouCanEat.Com&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/23/dotcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/23/dotcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/03/23/dotcom</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The increasingly humorless dot-com industry inspires a DIY revolution -- and lots of witty domain names.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he first signs of "the revolution" were visible on the morning of Feb. 29: around San Francisco big posters and small neon stickers advertised "IJustHadARectalExamOnline.com" and "ButIDon'tNeedMyToothpasteDelivered.com," and advised dot-com junkies and innocent bystanders alike to "BlowTheDotOutYourAss.com." It was Leap Day, known in some circles as <a target="new" href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdhelp/stories/main/0,5594,2450287,00.html" >the second coming of Y2K,</a> and commander "Sam Lowry" and his attractive sidekick, curiously named "Sam Lowry" as well, had gathered together about 30 friends to paper the town the night before. The sticker campaign marked the onslaught of BlowTheDot's campaign against an increasingly humorless dot-com industry.</p><p>Some nights before, on the way to an Internet company's launch party to load up on free booze, the Sams had been dismayed to find hundreds of would-be partyers waiting to get into the drinking establishment. "They were lining up like it was a cool thing to do," says Sam. It was but one of the plentitude of daily dot-com affairs that count as nightlife for many young Net-company types. But not for the Sams; they turned on their heels and headed home to drink their own booze and to kick-start "the revolution."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/23/dotcom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/23/dotcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictions for 2000</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2000/01/04/predictions</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cowhide computers, Russians in Redmond and other tech possibilities for the new year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>echnology has permeated most every aspect of our lives -- but the engineers and entrepreneurs who've introduced us to such innovative masterpieces as <a target="new" href="http://www.sony.co.jp/soj/aibo/index.html">robotic dogs</a> and <a href="/may97/21st/articleb970501.html">Bob</a> are tireless. Looking forward to a new year that will surely bring further evidence of their ceaseless creativity, we hereby salute some great ideas for the future.</p><p><b>Computer couture</b></p><p>As we leave the gray depths of the 20th century for the <a target="/21st/feature/1998/08/cov_27feature.html">Bondi Blue</a> sky of a radiant future, we'll be thinking <i>really</i> different. Look for beige computer boxes to be replaced by a rainbow of colors, as computer manufacturers partner with candy and cereal makers. Don't be surprised when Dell starts a Froot Loops line and Emachines, furiously looking for the Gen-Y angle, starts selling a Pentium III-powered Starburst line. Big Blue, of course, will launch a new line of ThinkPads in five tangy flavors: blueberry, blueberry, blueberry, blueberry and, yes, blueberry.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/predictions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft, Mahir and money, money, money</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/15/best_35/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/15/best_35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/1999/12/15/best</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A software superpower is declared a monopoly, free software rakes in billions and money makes the world go round: The year in tech.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>F</b>orget the coming-out parties of years past. In 1999, the Net grew up and went to work -- and its long-standing promise to change the way we do business became an inescapable reality. While the year was thin on technological breakthroughs -- with mammoth influences like America Online, AT&amp;T and Microsoft focused on politics (whether to compete or cooperate with each other) rather than innovation -- e-commerce took off. Online retailers selling everything from kitty litter and canned tuna to diamond rings, fine art and haute couture blanketed the Web, while a slew of dot-com companies forged a path toward pay-per-use software rentals, business-to-business auctions of surplus supplies and, of course, comparison-shopping services. No matter how many ideas Net companies came up with, there weren't enough to go around, leaving clusters of nearly identical businesses sprouting up like mushrooms after a rain. We've seen this competitive landscape before -- when hundreds of Internet service providers, or a dozen search engines, or a couple of browsers battled it out -- and we don't think we're going out on a limb when we say consolidation could be the watchword next year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/15/best_35/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/15/best_35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Honesty is the best policy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/09/truste/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/09/truste/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/11/09/truste</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RealNetworks is the latest company to expose personal data but escape action by TRUSTe. Does the privacy watchdog ever bite?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>f you really wanted people to trust you, would you pay a service to monitor your actions and then certify that you do what you say you do? Hardly. Generally speaking, our society runs on the notion that we are trustworthy until proven guilty -- of lies, bad checks or some other kind of fraud. Socialization and fear of a bad reputation keep us from telling too many white lies; the threat of fines and prison deters more serious breaches of trust.</p><p>Online, however, there is TRUSTe, a nonprofit organization that, for a fee, will audit a site and issue a seal assuring visitors that the site's privacy policy is telling the truth. As if it weren't strange enough to think that we would have more trust in a site that voluntarily pays a third party to verify its honesty, there is evidence that TRUSTe is less than inclined to let visitors know when a site slips up a bit on promises of privacy protection.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/09/truste/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/09/truste/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fear, marketing and Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/19/microsoft_marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/19/microsoft_marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/08/19/microsoft_marketing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will software-piracy busts and the coming of a new millennium scare you into buying more software?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b> came home to a scary letter from Microsoft on Monday. It began with news of three lawsuits Microsoft has filed against software pirates in the San Francisco Bay Area, where I live, and went on to describe how 30 FBI and police agents brought down a stolen software ring and sent the offenders to jail. Then it asked me -- well, actually it asked a friend's one-person company, with which I share a mailbox -- to be "part of the solution."</p><p>"Organizations like yours are their targets," it warned. "If your organization becomes a victim, you risk losing your software investment, gaining software viruses and becoming involved in the legal process associated with law enforcement raids and criminal prosecution."</p><p>But, wait a minute,  how am I -- or my friend's company, for that matter -- a "target" or a "victim"? The nomenclature was confusing, but I think Microsoft was trying to be threatening and opaque at the same time. The company doesn't want to sound mean -- it couldn't very well say, "If you buy illegal software, we're going to hunt you down like a dog."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/08/19/microsoft_marketing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/19/microsoft_marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loyalty matters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/03/empire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/03/empire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/08/03/empire</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new portal site hopes to entice members by offering free stock for frequent visits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"<b>T</b>his ad increases shareholder value." These were the first words I saw -- they appear just below a banner ad -- on <a target="new" href="http://www.myownempire.com">Myownempire.com,</a> a new portal site launched over the weekend. The next phrase to catch my eye: "Qualify for Stock."</p><p>It seems a little odd that these messages are more prominent than the portal's services, which include news, chat, metasearches of auction sites and other search engines and an option to call in and listen to a dictation of your e-mail messages. But Myownempire.com has a plan to give free Internet stock to its customers -- and the company is more interested in telling <i>that</i> story.</p><p>On Monday, founder Bob Haya spoke at length about how portal members might benefit from his company's growth -- explaining, for example, that Wall Street calculates users of Yahoo to be worth around $1,300 a person. Haya is excited about a complicated stock issuing plan that would allow "qualified users" to receive one share of stock in exchange for making the portal their start page and visiting it for 10 days out of every 30 days for three months. They can receive up to four more shares for referring other people to the site. Haya wouldn't say what it takes to qualify, because, he says, he's concerned that some people would misrepresent themselves to get in on the offering.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/08/03/empire/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/03/empire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL vs. Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/24/aol_microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/24/aol_microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/07/24/aol_microsoft</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this week&#039;s skirmish over online messaging,  who&#039;s on the consumer&#039;s side?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>his week, Microsoft rolled out a new instant messaging service that was supposed to let its users send "what's up" notes to users of America Online's similar service. But when Microsoft pushed onto AOL turf, AOL pushed back. So who's the bad guy in this skirmish?</p><p>By Microsoft's account, the company is trying to improve life for consumers, by making it possible for people to message each other even if they're not using the same software. "Just as consumers expect different telephones to work with one another, so they should expect different instant messaging services to talk to each other," Brad Chase, vice president of the Consumer and Commerce Group at Microsoft, said in a <a target="new" href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1999/Jul99/MessagingPR.htm">press release</a> on Wednesday. "MSN Messenger Service is the first messaging application to offer the inter-operability people are demanding."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/07/24/aol_microsoft/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/24/aol_microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft to Web sites: Behave!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/24/privacy_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/24/privacy_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/06/24/privacy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Redmond says it will pull ads from sites that don&#039;t post strong privacy policies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Y</b>ou can't blame Microsoft for wanting to avoid another run-in with the feds -- and that seems to be the primary impetus for its big <a target="new" href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/1999/06-23privacy.htm">privacy</a> announcement on Wednesday. The Internet's biggest advertiser made a splash with the news that it won't buy ads on any site that doesn't post "comprehensive privacy statements."</p><p>Congress -- fired up by constituents' outrage over spam and fear that their online behavior is being tracked -- has made plenty of noise about regulating privacy on the Net, with some politicians suggesting that the industry needs to do what's right by consumers or face regulation. As Senator Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, put it in April: "The last thing you want is for us to come in with a heavy hand ... and that's where it's headed." Meanwhile, the Federal Trade Commission is currently preparing its Internet privacy recommendations for Congress.</p><p>This is the climate in which Microsoft has announced the strategy of pulling its big bucks -- the company spent more than $34 million on Net advertising in 1998 -- from any site that dares mess with consumers' right to privacy. The goal is "to make the Web a safer place for customers," explains Microsoft spokeswoman Melissa Covelli.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/24/privacy_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/24/privacy_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Got my groovy browser baby, yeah</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/15/neoplanet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/15/neoplanet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/06/15/neoplanet</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It might be worth turning your browser into a "desktop-portal" -- if "Austin Powers" is part of the deal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>t's hard not to be tickled pink the first time you hear Mike Myers' voice emerge from your computer, growling, "Groovy baby, yeah." And all it takes to cause such excitement is a click of the flower-powered channel bar on the "Austin Powers" version of the NeoPlanet browser -- <a target="new" href="http://www.austinpowers.com/Browser/index.html">released</a> over the weekend on the <a target="new" href="http://www.austinpowers.com">"Austin Powers"</a> movie site. But it gets old quick.</p><p>Call me a curmudgeon, but I just don't want to have <i>that</i> much fun with my browser. In fact, before I saw the "Austin Powers"-branded browser -- with Myers' alluring mug and a cartoonish Union Jack dancing along the tool bar -- I just couldn't drum up a whole lot of interest in the NeoPlanet browser.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/15/neoplanet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/15/neoplanet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kevin Mitnick supporters plan rallies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/04/mitnick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/04/mitnick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/06/04/mitnick</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fellow hackers organize Friday protests of  his imprisonment, in hopes of winning him a room at a halfway house.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since his 1995 arrest for wire and computer fraud, famed hacker <a href="/30dec1995/features/mitnick1.html">Kevin Mitnick</a> has been behind bars. In March a judge <a target="new" href="http://www.wired.com/news/news/technology/story/18782.html">sentenced</a> him to a 46-month prison term after he pleaded guilty to a handful of the 25 charges filed against him. But on Friday, demonstrators in 15 U.S. cities and Moscow plan to <a target="new" href="http://www.2600.com/demo/index.html">protest</a> what they see as the unjust treatment of Mitnick and ask for his parole to a halfway house.</p><p>"The guy's been in there for something like four years and four months," says Emmanuel Goldstein, editor of <a target="new" href="http://www.2600.com">"2600</a>: the Hacker Quarterly." (Actually, 2600's <a target="new" href="http://www.2600.com/mindex.html">Kevin Mitnick Lockdown Clock</a> put it at exactly 4 years, 3 months, 16 days, 11 hours, 19 minutes and 41 seconds at that moment, but who's counting?)</p><p>It's a heavy sentence for just looking at other people's software, says Goldstein: "The federal government is using him to send a message."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/04/mitnick/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/04/mitnick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

