<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Karin Halperin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/karin_halperin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hey barkeep &#8212; gimme a beer and an AIDS test!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/10/18/rapid_hiv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/10/18/rapid_hiv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2004/10/18/rapid_hiv</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New HIV tests give results in 20 minutes, and are attracting people who avoided being tested before. But is a Bourbon Street dive the best place to find out you're positive? 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About once a month, James Swire, venue outreach worker at <a target="new" href="http://www.noaidstaskforce.org">NO/AIDS Task Force</a> in New Orleans, runs a rolling laboratory, alternating between a trio of bars clustered on and around Bourbon Street, the neon-lit, brassy entertainment strip of topless bars, music clubs, restaurants, souvenir shops and T-shirt stalls that cuts through the fabled French Quarter. </p><p>Swire brings to the block the latest in HIV-testing technology: a finger-prick test called OraQuick that delivers on-the-spot results in 20 minutes with 99.6 percent accuracy. "I make up fliers and posters that I cover the whole building with," he says. </p><p>The building might be the <a target="new" href="http://www.bourbonpub.com">Bourbon Pub Parade,</a> the <a target="new" href="http://www.goodfriendsbar.com">Good Friends Bar</a> or <a target="new" href="http://www.lafittes.com">Cafe Lafitte in Exile,</a> where Tennessee Williams used to drink. Some of the bar managers even allow him a promo speech, something like "'Hey, we're upstairs doing the HIV rapid testing. Know your results in 20 to 25 minutes.' And they'll come up and get tested," Swire says. And sometimes "they're lined up before we get there, knowing what's going on that day." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/10/18/rapid_hiv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/10/18/rapid_hiv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black-and-blue in ones and zeros</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/07/10/digital_violence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/07/10/digital_violence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2002/07/10/digital_violence</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digital photography is revolutionizing the prosecution of domestic violence cases.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Settling into his chair at his cluttered desk on a Tuesday morning, Scott Kessler flicks on his computer and calls up images of injuries. A woman's face emerges, her nose outlined in purplish-blue bruises. Swollen cheeks, lacerated lips, abrasions, scratches, bruised limbs and broken capillaries fill the screen as Kessler, head of the domestic violence bureau in New York's Queens County District Attorney's Office, clicks open recent files, 15 from that morning. </p><p>He pauses before an image, pointing out a cut that scores a women's eyelid like an engraving. In another, bumps rise like a ridge from a man's forehead. Kessler zooms in on a woman's back, focusing on a red patch surrounded by black and blue. "You can see the outline of the object used -- a stick," he says. "You'll never see anything like that on a Polaroid." </p><p>At the 112th Precinct in northern Queens, Officer Linda Rivera holds up a 1.2 megapixel Kodak DC-120 with zoom and built-in viewer. "I was a little nervous when I heard the word 'digital camera,'" she says. "But it's so basic. A victim comes in. We photograph her here or at the hospital. You press two buttons. You see the photo instantly." Before the coming of digital, "we got a lot of dark photos. We'd run out of film. It could be spoiled, discolored." Close-ups, critical for depicting wounds, required cumbersome attachments, some of which had to be fastened to the victim. "This is quicker and less invasive." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/07/10/digital_violence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/07/10/digital_violence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

