<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Kl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/kl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Expert Witness: Mac McCaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/09/mccaughan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/09/mccaughan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/video_dog/2009/09/09/mccaughan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Open Salon interview.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open Salon interview.</p><p>        </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/09/mccaughan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/09/mccaughan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 political ads: Santorum&#8217;s dud</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/santorum_25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/santorum_25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/26/santorum</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A struggling Santorum resorts to the nuclear button.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A struggling Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Penn., went nuclear Wednesday, with an ad that tries to ally challenger Bob Casey with North Korea and China. Ah, the acrid smell of desperation in the weeks before a congressional election! Be prepared for even more of these terror-filled spots in these glorious final days of Campaign 2006, all of which carry a little DNA from the mother of all scare ads: The 1964 Lyndon Johnson "Daisy Girl" ad against Barry Goldwater (bottom ad, below).</p><p> <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CzthL0ATSQg"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CzthL0ATSQg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p><p> <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ND3FdwXgRSg"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ND3FdwXgRSg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/santorum_25/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/santorum_25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 political ads: Harold Ford gets smeared</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_2_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_2_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/26/ford_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Ford/Playboy connection gets big play.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Michael Scherer's <a target="new" href="http://salon.com/news/feature/2006/10/26/harold_ford/">piece</a> today: "The GOP seems to believe that Ford's appeal to its most reliable voters is working. In recent days, the Republican National Committee has attempted to reverse the troubling polls in Tennessee with a television ad that both attacks Ford's religious credentials and invokes that old standby of American politics, racial fear."</p><p> <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cWkrwENN5CQ"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cWkrwENN5CQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_2_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_2_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 political ads: Harold Ford &#8212; the &#8220;Playboy&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_what_kind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_what_kind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/26/ford_what_kind</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An early attack ad against Harold Ford.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This National Republican Senatorial Committee ad against <a target="new" href="http://salon.com/news/feature/2006/10/26/harold_ford/">Harold Ford</a> sports an early mention of a Playboy connection that the party hopes will rile Christians against Ford. <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tM3moGL3fIk"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tM3moGL3fIk" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_what_kind/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_what_kind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 political ads: Harold Ford goes to church</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/26/ford</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Harold Ford preaches to the choir.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="new" href="http://salon.com/news/feature/2006/10/26/harold_ford/">Salon's piece</a> on Rep. Harold Ford Jr.'s senate campaign spotlights his appeal to churchgoers, as in the TV spot below. </p><p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HxSmHByxkEY"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HxSmHByxkEY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_18/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/26/ford_18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 political ads: The star(?)-studded response to Michael J. Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/fox_response_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/fox_response_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/25/fox_response</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative response to the Michael J. Fox ad -- in Aramaic?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We're a little baffled by this Republican response to the <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/politics/2006/10/23/fox/index.html">Michael J. Fox</a> ad in support of stem-cell research. Is quarterback Kurt Warner interviewed from jail? Is Patricia Heaton in church? And is a stoned JIm Caviezel, at the very beginning of this ad, speaking in Aramaic? Seriously: What the hell <i>is</i> he saying? Translators, please post in the Comments. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/fox_response_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/fox_response_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 political ads: Another Zucker effort</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/zucker_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/zucker_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/25/zucker</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another ad from GOP Hollywood hack David Zucker]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ad is unquestionably better than David "Airplane!" Zucker's previous, <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/politics/2006/10/11/spoof/index.html">appropriately censored</a> ad that featured the worst Madeleine Albright impersonator imaginable. The idea that Democrats will actually steal babies is, of course, completely untrue! (Except. . . is Madonna a Democrat?) Still, much funnier effort. </p><p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oj-EAMgZWtE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oj-EAMgZWtE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/zucker_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/zucker_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 Election Ads: Run! Hide! Vote GOP!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/23/rnc_11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/23/rnc_11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/23/rnc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A frighteningly bad scare ad from the RNC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Republicans really plan on trying to scare the bejesus out of us in order to stave off their anticipated losses in the midterm elections, they sure need to do better than this ad, which aired Sunday on CNN. Shadowy footage that appears to be from al-Qaida training camps are matched with images of Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri -- their threats transcribed in a teeny-tiny type face -- as a clock ticks on the soundtrack. It's such a cliche, it's not far from that <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/politics/2006/10/13/lamont/index.html">Lamont ad</a> that caricatured Bush-Cheney scare tactics. We've been creeped out so many times in the past five years, we've grown inured to this stuff. Next time, maybe they should throw a little <a target="new" href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=grudge2.htm">Japanese ghost child</a> in the ads?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/23/rnc_11/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/23/rnc_11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 political ads: The Michael J. Fox spot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/23/fox_36/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/23/fox_36/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/23/fox</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Michael J. Fox campaign ad that's shocking and inspiring.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael J. Fox's ad for Democrat Claire McCaskill is moving, and the fact that it's undeniably tough to watch -- a famously boyish American actor suffering the debilitating effects of Parkinson's disease -- probably doesn't weaken its effect as an ad. In fact, in two days on YouTube, it's been watched well over 300,000 times. Fox, a staunch supporter of embryonic stem-cell research, is about as clean-cut, heart-wrenching a spokesman as you could possibly want. Incumbent Rep. Jim Talent, R-Mo., who opposes such research, certainly can't relish being the bad guy here. <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/a9WB_PXjTBo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a9WB_PXjTBo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/23/fox_36/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/23/fox_36/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 political ads: I&#8217;m a cheater &#8212; not a choker!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/19/sherwood_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/19/sherwood_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/19/sherwood</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A sordid family dispute plays out in campaign ads.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our ongoing survey of political season's weird and wonderful campaign ads (keep sending them in to: videodog@salon.com!), there's really been nothing as weirdly absorbing as the efforts of Rep. Don Sherwood, R-Pa., who President Bush <a target="new" href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/10/19/national/w133517D60.DTL&type=politics"> appeared</a> with today on the campaign trail, to get re-elected. How does a 65-year-old, who looks for all the world like an embattled high school principal hell-bent on retirement, explain to his constituents about his 30-year-old mistress in D.C., much less her accusation that he tried to choke her? With one of the most excruciating campaign ads we have ever witnessed: </p><p> <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8D303Zo3nlk"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8D303Zo3nlk" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object> </p><p>This, naturally, inspired at least a few parodies:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/19/sherwood_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/19/sherwood_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2006 political ads: Morphing George</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/18/granholm_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/18/granholm_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/18/granholm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the best political ad tricks: The morphing George.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sub-genre in Democratic political ads this year has been the commercials that attempt to not only tar Republicans through guilt-by-association with George W. Bush, but to convince voters they may actually <i>be</i> Bush. And the best one we've seen was done by Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm's re-election campaign against Amway billionaire Dick DeVos. <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PoXwcz1_azA"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PoXwcz1_azA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/18/granholm_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/18/granholm_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political ad contest: The best &#8212; or worst?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/17/christy_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/17/christy_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/17/christy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our first political ad in our year-end best/worst contest.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the next few weeks, we'll be spotlighting the political ads you send in as we near the release of our lists of the best and worst campaign ads. But first up is this curious spot by one Christy Mihos, the independent candidate for Massachusetts. It's curious because we've received several nominations for it -- as both the best and worst political ad. What do you think?</p><p> <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/B7dfzNHfQmA"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/B7dfzNHfQmA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/17/christy_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/17/christy_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Picture perfect</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/16/olde_parody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/16/olde_parody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/video_dog/comedy/2006/10/16/olde_parody</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The greatest parody of a viral video ever? Maybe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A parody of the much loved/derided <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/documentary/2006/09/05/noah/">"Six Years of Noah"</a> video watched by gillions this summer, it also sort of echoes that other phenomenon launched by <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/classic/2006/06/22/matt/index.html">Matt Harding</a>. We loved both of those, but this inspired bit from the wise young sages at <a target="new" href="http://www.oldeenglish.org/">Olde English</a> may just merit its own viral explosion.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/16/olde_parody/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/16/olde_parody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cereal killer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/16/cuncha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/16/cuncha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/video_dog/comedy/2006/10/16/cuncha</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A cereal commercial parody that's not for the squeamish.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you may find this cereal parody from <a target="new" href="http://www.invisibleengine.com">Invisible Engine</a> in particularly poor taste. But maybe that just means you a need a big bowl of Buncha Cunch! </p><p> <embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://flash.revver.com/player/1.0/player.swf" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" scale="noScale" salign="TL" bgcolor="#ffffff" flashvars="width=480&height=392&mediaId=80672&affiliateId=0&javascriptContext=true&skinURL=http://flash.revver.com/player/1.0/skins/Default_Raster.swf&skinImgURL=http://flash.revver.com/player/1.0/skins/night_skin.png&actionBarSkinURL=http://flash.revver.com/player/1.0/skins/DefaultNavBarSkin.swf&resizeVideo=True" wmode="transparent" height="392" width="480"></embed> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/16/cuncha/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/16/cuncha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political ads: The good, the bad, the unwatchable</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/13/lamont_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/13/lamont_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/13/lamont</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Help us chronicle the campaign season's best and worst political ads.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Democratic challenger Ned Lamont's <a target="new" href="http://search.salon.com/salonsearch.php?search=lamont+video+dog&breadth=salon">run of clever TV ads</a> continue with the new one below, or does it come crashing to an overproduced, overly clever and sort of obnoxious halt? We know what we think, but we're more interested in hearing what you think. </p><p> We also want you to send us the best and worst political ads you've seen this season so far. It can be a YouTube link or other (many candidates post their TV spots on their Websites) or a video of the ad itself. Just send it to videodog@salon.com, and we'll spotlight the high/lowlights in these final weeks of campaign season, culminating in Top 10 lists of the best and worst. </p><p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/L3gSOWrxdd4"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/L3gSOWrxdd4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/13/lamont_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/13/lamont_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s Next Top Traitor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/13/gadahn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/13/gadahn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/12/gadahn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some delightful al-Qaida recruitment efforts from America's new No.1 Traitor!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former goat farmer, ex-O.C. inhabitant, and current al-Qaida spokesman Adam Gadahn, 28, became the first American since World War II <a target="new" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/12/terror/main2084483.shtml">charged with treason</a> Wednesday. The rolly-polly would-be mass muderer faces a possible death sentence for his (frankly unimpressive) work since 2004 as a public face for the terrorist shop. We unearthed one of his recruitment videos, and supplied some translations where needed, below.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/13/gadahn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/13/gadahn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash! Lame political ad never airs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/11/spoof/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/11/spoof/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/11/spoof</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lame poltiical ad the GOP had the good sense to ditch.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Drudge plays up this video as the Republican political ad that "GOP strategists all across Washington, DC" have deemed "too hot." Or not. The ad, created by Hollywood producer/director David Zucker ("Scary Movie," "Police Squad!" "Airplane!") allegedly was created for widespread GOP use in the waning weeks of the campaign season, and is now being rejected by all. We suspect the reason has less to do with its purported <i>hotness</i> than its serious <i>lameness</i>. An atrociously bad Madeleine Albright imitator's skirt splits while she's changing a tire for a Middle Eastern dictator. Har! Democrats wish the GOP would've been dumb enough to run this: </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/11/spoof/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/11/spoof/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foley Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/11/scarco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/11/scarco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joan Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Ashburn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/video_dog/media/2006/10/11/scarco</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Mark Foley, for the gift of laughter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This segment on last night's "ScarCo" is a great summary of the great laughs made at the expense of Repbulicans via Mark Foley. We particularly like it when they air the clip of "The Daily Show," and we hear one of the guests (conservative Bob Kohn, we think) moan, "Oh, good lord," right after Stewart says the word "jism." One of the other guests is Salon strongwoman Joan Walsh, who stipulates to TV producers that <i>she only appear on-screen with men sporting lacquered hair.</i> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/11/scarco/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/11/scarco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rakoff on &#8220;Daily&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/09/rakoff_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/09/rakoff_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/video_dog/latenight/2006/10/09/rakoff</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A hilarious interview with David Rakoff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we were away, we missed Video Dog <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/comedy/2006/06/02/dave_hill/">favorite</a> David Rakoff visiting with Jon Stewart last week, and his trenchant musings on Mark Foley, gay Republicans, and the indefatigable vagina. </p><p> <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZHkYsgp9XaE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZHkYsgp9XaE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/09/rakoff_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/09/rakoff_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First they came for Michelle Malkin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/09/malkin_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/09/malkin_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2006/10/09/malkin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The YouTube-banned Michelle Malkin video.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defending a hopelessly hackneyed baby Coulter isn't our idea of a great time, but really, what was YouTube thinking when it bounced Michelle Malkin's cheesy and (as the New York Times <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/09/technology/09link.html?_r=1&oref=slogin">points out here</a>) shabbily thought-out little bit of agitprop below? (It keeps getting re-posted to YouTube quicker than they can delete it.) We were off last week, so are late to this little dust-up. But we did read the news of Google eyeing YouTube, and began to wonder about the value of a site that is entirely user-generated and may, ultimately, require massive amounts of oversight. Malkin's zany conservatism pales compared 99 percent of the political content on YouTube. And that doesn't even begin to take into consideration the massive amounts of copyright violation going on. (Go ahead: Dream up a "South Park" episode you'd really, really like to watch right now in its entirety, and trust me, <a target="new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2Xt4CKgaJA">it's probably there</a>.) We've enjoyed the ride of YouTube thus far -- and certainly exploited its riches -- but its golden era to us seems close to going down the tubes. </p><p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wEgoUJqnzxo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wEgoUJqnzxo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/09/malkin_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/09/malkin_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
