Lamar Waldron with Thom Hartmann

The mafia, the coup and the murder

The authors respond to David Talbot's review of "Ultimate Sacrifice."

  • more
    • All Share Services

We appreciate the serious coverage of “Ultimate Sacrifice” in Salon.com, but there are several assertions and omissions in the review written by David Talbot that we’d like to address.

“Ultimate Sacrifice” presents evidence from thousands of pages of declassified documents that John and Robert Kennedy planned to stage a coup against Castro on Dec. 1, 1963, and that the plan was infiltrated by three Mafia bosses (from the mob families that controlled Chicago, Tampa and Dallas). The Mafia chiefs then used parts of the coup plan, including some U.S. intelligence assets, in their plot to kill JFK — first trying in Chicago, then Tampa, and finally Dallas — in a way that forced a coverup to protect national security, and the coup plan. The documentary evidence is backed up by accounts from almost two dozen Kennedy associates involved in aspects of those events, and their aftermath.

The most glaring omission in Talbot’s review was not addressing or even mentioning AMWORLD, the CIA’s code name for their supporting role in the Kennedy coup plan in 1963. AMWORLD is a major focus of the book. “Ultimate Sacrifice” not only reveals this recently declassified operation for the first time, but documents that it was withheld from the Warren Commission and later congressional investigating committees.

AMWORLD, which began on June 28, 1963, was an integral part of the Kennedys’ plan for a coup in Cuba and it’s impossible to consider one without the other. Coup planning began in January 1963 as a slow-moving, bureaucratic exercise, and the plan was only in its fourth draft by June 1963. But that month, planning began in earnest after the real opportunity for a high-level coup arose. After the CIA created AMWORLD, millions of dollars began to be devoted to the coup plan. From that point forward, coup planning proceeded rapidly, demonstrating that it had become a live operation. By September 1963 the “Plan for a Coup in Cuba” was in its 13th draft, and the rapid pace accelerated further, continuing through November of 1963. (After JFK’s death, the CIA kept the AMWORLD code name, but without the involvement of Robert Kennedy and other key figures, the plan changed radically.)

The most important of our five sources who actively worked on the coup plan was the Kennedys’ top Cuban exile aide, Enrique “Harry” Ruiz-Williams (who asked us to always call him “Harry”). Talbot acknowledged in his review that Harry was close to RFK, but says that Harry’s “belief that a Kennedy-backed assault on the Castro regime was imminent might be a case of wishful thinking.” That’s not what the evidence demonstrates. Harry’s account — and that of the others — is backed up by many declassified coup plan and AMWORLD documents that talk about them and the operation. High-level AMWORLD documents from November 1963 say that “all US plans (were) being coordinated through” Harry and he had been “so named by Robert Kennedy.”

By Nov. 22, 1963, millions of dollars had been spent on the coup plan, hundreds of Cuban-American troops had been trained, U.S. assets were going into Cuba, and everything was ready. As noted in the book, a long-overlooked Washington Post article confirms that Harry’s work “had reached an important point” by November 22, when Harry “participated in the most crucial of a series of secret meetings with top-level CIA and government people about Cuba.” Harry and other Kennedy associates told us he was going into Cuba the following day, to await the Dec. 1, 1963, coup — a date consistent with what we were told by others who worked with RFK on the coup plan and which is contained in an AMWORLD memo from JFK’s CIA director.

Talbot seems skeptical of the coup plan because JFK’s Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara told him he didn’t know about a “major Cuban intervention” in late 1963. Talbot also questions the credibility of Secretary of State Dean Rusk, who first told us about the coup plan in 1990. However, Talbot didn’t mention that Rusk gave an on-the-record confirmation of the coup plan to Anthony Summers for Vanity Fair in 1994, three years before the first “Plan for a Coup in Cuba” documents were declassified. Rusk even explained to Summers why the Kennedys pursued the coup plan and secret peace negotiations with Castro at the same time, saying, “It was just an either/or situation. That went on frequently,” though Rusk told Summers that in doing so, “the Kennedys ‘were playing with fire.’”

As the book explains, we have only identified a dozen people so far who were fully informed about the coup plan prior to JFK’s death, and McNamara wasn’t one of them. Evidence indicates the only military figures who were fully informed include Joint Chiefs chairman Gen. Maxwell Taylor, Defense Intelligence Agency chief Gen. Joseph Carroll, and Secretary of the Army Cyrus Vance. Rusk told us he only learned about the coup plan after JFK’s death. Still, Rusk and his subordinates — and other officials — had helped to shape the coup plan while JFK was alive, having been told it was being developed in case the CIA found a powerful Cuban official willing to stage a coup against Castro. That’s why Talbot was in error when he wrote we must “have confused what were contingency plans for a coup in Cuba for the real deal.”

The coup plan was so serious that in the days and weeks before Dallas, Robert Kennedy had a secret committee making plans for dealing with the possible “assassination of American officials” if Castro found out and tried to retaliate. The same people working on those plans were also working on the coup plan and AMWORLD. While Talbot didn’t mention those plans in his review, we did include a Nov. 12, 1963, document from that committee in our excerpt, which Salon was kind enough to run.

Our book cites documents totaling thousands of pages from the National Archives, which we encourage people to view for themselves. A reader of Talbot’s review might get the impression that we pieced together our story of AMWORLD and the “Plan for a Coup in Cuba” from the documents released in the mid- to late 1990s, but that is not correct. Starting in 1990, we were told about the coup plan and the CIA by Dean Rusk and other Kennedy associates, long before any of the documents were released. We made public presentations about the coup plan and the CIA’s role in it beginning in 1993, at historical conferences, on the History Channel, and in Vanity Fair, to draw attention to the documents that remained unreleased. When the coup plan documents finally started being declassified in 1997, they included the same people and phrases (“Plan for a Coup in Cuba”) we’d been using for years.

Talbot says we “take pains to (repeatedly) exonerate the CIA in the killing of Kennedy,” but we present evidence against several CIA personnel that implicates them to some degree in JFK’s assassination. “Ultimate Sacrifice” details how AMWORLD was one way three Mafia bosses — Carlos Marcello of Louisiana (who controlled the rackets in Dallas), Tampa’s Santo Trafficante, and Johnny Rosselli of the Chicago mob — infiltrated the Kennedy coup plan. For example, we quote CIA documents showing that Rosselli’s mob paid $200,000 in August 1963 to one of the Cuban exile leaders for the coup plan and AMWORLD, Tony Varona.

Using the CIA’s own declassified documents, our book exposes Mafia-compromised CIA assets, extensive CIA intelligence failures, unauthorized operations, and the stonewalling of Robert Kennedy and government committees by certain CIA officials — all under the veil of secrecy covering AMWORLD.

The CIA personnel and CIA exile assets whom Talbot himself fingers at the end of his review — Morales, Phillips, Harvey, Varona, Artime — were all the subjects of incriminating new evidence presented in “Ultimate Sacrifice,” and most had major roles in AMWORLD in 1963. Though we also present exculpatory facts where they exist, we present serious evidence against people like David Morales — operations chief of Miami’s huge CIA station in 1963 and close to Rosselli — as well as exile leaders such as Varona and Manuel Artime.

Our focus on Marcello and his allies being behind JFK’s death didn’t originate with us — it came from Robert Kennedy and his associates. It’s well documented that after Robert F. Kennedy learned all he could from several private investigations, RFK told close associates such as Richard Goodwin and Hoffa prosecutor Walter Sheridan that New Orleans godfather Marcello was behind his brother’s death. In 1979, the House Select Committee on assassinations — whose director was a former Mafia prosecutor for RFK — concluded that both Marcello and Trafficante had the motive, means and opportunity to kill JFK. However, since so much was withheld from the committee (including AMWORLD, the “Plan for a Coup in Cuba,” the Tampa assassination attempt four days before Dallas, etc.), they weren’t able to find conclusive proof.

After spending several years reviewing all the theories about the assassination, we were pointed toward a conspiracy led by Marcello, Trafficante, and Rosselli by a knowledgeable Kennedy associate in 1992, and quickly found a huge amount of supporting evidence. In addition to all the documentary evidence, we talked with five attorneys who worked under RFK at the Justice Department, as well as Pierre Salinger, who worked for the Kennedys in the 1950s as a Senate Mafia investigator targeting Marcello. Typical is Ronald Goldfarb, who concluded in his own book about those years “the likelihood [was] that our organized crime program” caused “Marcello and Trafficante to plot an audacious assassination.”

Our book documents the godfathers’ infiltration of the coup plan, and how they linked it to JFK’s assassination in over a dozen ways, from the bullet found in Oswald’s rifle to exile leaders like Varona. Talbot says RFK could have simply explained “the national security concerns in the judge’s chambers” and proceeded with his prosecutions, but it would have been impossible to prosecute — or even extensively investigate — the godfathers’ role without completely exposing the coup and invasion plan. In those tense Cold War times, just a year after the nuclear standoff during the Cuban Missile Crisis, that could have triggered a nuclear confrontation with the Soviets.

RFK tried to prosecute Marcello for other offenses even after JFK’s death, to no avail. The attorney general kept the pressure on Jimmy Hoffa, a close ally of Marcello and Trafficante, and on Rosselli’s Chicago Mafia. But if it had been publicly reported that the attorney general of the United States even suspected the Mafia of his brother’s death, defense attorneys in those cases and many more would have had a field day. Talbot also failed to mention that Marcello, Trafficante and Rosselli all eventually confessed their involvement in JFK’s assassination to associates. Two men who worked with Trafficante and Rosselli — and who documents confirm knew about AMWORLD — also confessed to friends, later in life.

Talbot says we “assert that Bobby blamed only the Mafia (and New Orleans godfather Carlos Marcello in particular) for the death of his brother,” but we also detail RFK’s initial suspicions directed at the CIA. This includes not only RFK asking CIA director John McCone if the CIA killed his brother, but RFK’s statement to Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Haynes Johnson that “one of your guys did it,” just hours after JFK’s murder. As the book explains, Johnson was working at the time on a book with Manuel Artime, and CIA files now show Artime was not only involved in AMWORLD but working on the CIA-Mafia plots against Castro (which involved Rosselli, Trafficante and Marcello) and that the CIA had considered using the Mafia as a cover to provide weapons to Artime as part of AMWORLD.

Talbot says he can’t understand “why in the world would organized crime bosses knock off Kennedy just days before he was about to knock off Castro?” As the book explains, the Kennedys tried to exclude the Mafia from any involvement in the coup plan, and any involvement in Cuba after the coup. As our sources told us and documents confirm, the Kennedys’ goal for Cuba was a democracy with “free elections.” Helping to ensure that would be the presence of U.S. troops, so even if the Kennedy coup plan were successful, it would do the Mafia no good.

The Mafia bosses had to kill JFK before the Dec. 1, 1963, coup, because only the top-secret coup plan/AMWORLD could provide the secrecy the Mafia needed to prevent a thorough, public investigation of JFK’s assassination. Plus, Marcello was already on trial by RFK’s men and Rosselli’s Chicago mafia was under attack from RFK and the attorney general had just announced a massive crackdown on Las Vegas, where Rosselli represented the Chicago mob. Rosselli and Marcello weren’t even U.S. citizens, and feared deportation even if they were only convicted of a relatively minor offense. Trafficante’s criminal empire, and his close ally Hoffa, were under constant assault by RFK, so eliminating JFK to end RFK’s war against them had to be the first order of business for the mob bosses. If the Mafia chiefs later wanted to eliminate Castro (which some experts feel Trafficante didn’t want to do), they always had the CIA-Mafia plots to use against Castro, plots they played a major role in, unlike the Kennedys’ coup plan.

By the end of Talbot’s review we don’t seem that far apart in our conclusions, of a conspiracy involving mob godfathers, some CIA personnel, and a few Cuban exiles. Our hope is that all authors, historians and researchers can work to get the remaining million-plus files that we talk about in our book released, and follow the evidence wherever it leads.

“Ultimate Sacrifice”: An excerpt

In a blockbuster story unrevealed until now, the mob tried to kill Kennedy just days before he was gunned down in Dallas.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Author’s introduction

“Ultimate Sacrifice” reveals for the first time in any book that JFK was the target of an assassination plot during his long motorcade in Tampa, Florida, on November 18, 1963, four days before Dallas. The Tampa plot — and its many parallels to Dallas — has remained hidden because of the battles John and Robert Kennedy were waging against Fidel Castro and the Mafia in 1963. The Kennedys had a top-secret “Plan for a Coup in Cuba” designed to overthrow Castro on December 1, 1963, and JFK’s activities on November 18, 1963, were part of that plan. Hours after JFK’s Tampa motorcade, the president was scheduled to give a major speech on Cuba in Miami, intended to assure the coup leader in Cuba of JFK’s support. Several lines in JFK’s speech had been provided by the CIA, whose code-name for their supporting role in the coup plan was “AMWORLD,” a name only recently declassified.

The Kennedys pursued their coup plan because Castro had not allowed the UN inspections for weapons of mass destruction that were part of JFK’s agreement with Russian leader Khrushchev to end the Cuban Missile Crisis. The Kennedys had attempted secret negotiations with Castro in the fall of 1963, but those were not producing results. So, working with Cuban exiles close to Robert Kennedy such as Enrique “Harry” Ruiz-Williams and Manuel Artime, the Kennedys continued their plans for a coup, which we call “C-Day” for convenience.

In 1963, C-Day (AMWORLD) was different and far more advanced than any previously-disclosed coup plan (AMTRUNK) or the CIA’s own Castro assassination operations that had not been authorized by the Kennedys. Those included a plot with mid-level Cuban official Rolando Cubela (AMLASH) run by CIA officials Richard Helms and Desmond FitzGerald. Other unauthorized CIA Castro assassination plots in the fall of 1963 included the CIA-Mafia plots with mobster Johnny Rosselli, who worked closely with David Morales, Chief of Operations at the CIA’s huge Miami station.

In the days and weeks before Dallas, Robert Kennedy had a committee making contingency plans for dealing with the possible “assassination of American officials” if Castro uncovered the coup plan and decided to retaliate. However, the real danger was from the Mafia bosses Attorney General Robert Kennedy was prosecuting in the largest war against organized crime America had ever seen. Tampa godfather Santo Trafficante, Carlos Marcello — godfather of Louisiana and east Texas (including Dallas) — and Johnny Rosselli’s Chicago Mafia family were specific targets. As Marcello told an associate, he intended to end Robert Kennedy’s crusade against them by killing JFK. These three Mafia bosses infiltrated and compromised the Kennedys’ C-Day coup plan, as part of their plot to kill JFK. They realized linking JFK’s death to C-Day/AMWORLD would eliminate any chance of a truly thorough investigation, because of national security concerns.

The Tampa plot would be the second Mafia attempt to assassinate JFK in November 1963; the first had taken place in Chicago on November 2, 1963. JFK had cancelled his Chicago motorcade and trip at the last moment, after a serious threat emerged which had been kept secret at the time. The gunmen were not apprehended, but an unusual ex-Marine named Thomas Vallee — who had several parallels to Lee Harvey Oswald — was briefly detained. “Ultimate Sacrifice” also details the role of Chicago law enforcement official Richard Cain, a “made” member of the Mafia and associate of Rosselli, whom CIA documents confirm had learned about C-Day. Shortly after the Chicago threat, a Miami police informant obtained information about an upcoming attempt on JFK from far-right extremist Joseph Milteer, whom the book links to a man working for Carlos Marcello. The attempt on JFK in Trafficante’s Tampa was apparently meant to be blamed on a young man named Gilbert Policarpo Lopez, whom the book notes had more than a dozen parallels to Oswald in 1963. Among them were links to the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, being a former defector, a tie to Russia, getting into a fight over seeming pro-Castro sympathies, and an unusual trip to Mexico City. Lopez would be secretly investigated by the FBI, CIA, and Warren Commission staff after JFK’s assassination, though the book makes it clear he was only a patsy.

– Lamar Waldron

Chapter 56: November 18, 1963: The attempt to assassinate JFK in Tampa

By late Sunday, November 17, or early Monday, November 18, 1963, the Secret Service was extremely concerned that an attempt would be made to assassinate JFK during his motorcade in Tampa, Florida. This threat, detailed here for the first time, has not appeared in any previous book. Information about the threat was confirmed by Tampa’s police chief at the time, J. P. Mullins; by a high Florida law-enforcement official involved in security for JFK’s motorcade; and by Secret Service agents such as Abraham Bolden. Secret Service documents about the Tampa attempt were destroyed “in an apparent violation of the JFK Act” in 1995, according to the JFK Assassinations Records Review Board. (1) We had first informed the Board of the Tampa attempt just a few weeks earlier, after finding what appear to be the only two articles about it which briefly surfaced in two Florida newspapers in the days after JFK’s death (no articles about the threat appeared while JFK was still alive). One small article appeared in the Tampa Tribune on November 23, and part of that article was excerpted in a small article in the Miami Herald on November 24. However, by that time “the FBI, Secret Service, and local officers declined to discuss the matter,” and no further articles appeared in either paper.(2)

This plot to kill JFK was different from the minor threats reported against JFK in Tampa in May 1963 and October 1963 (the latter involving a businessman named John Warrington, who had nothing to do with the serious threat). (3) The Tampa threat was not revealed to the Warren Commission or any of the later government committees that investigated aspects of JFK’s assassination, until we brought it to the attention of the Review Board in 1995. The House Select Committee on Assassinations had a few documents which in retrospect did concern the serious Tampa threat, but since the HSCA had not been officially informed of that threat, they apparently assumed that those documents only applied to the Joseph Milteer threat.

One of the two surviving small articles mentions “a memo from the White House Secret Service dated Nov. 8 [that] reported: ‘Subject made statement of a plan to assassinate the President in October 1963. Subject stated he will use a gun … Subject is described as white, male, 20, slender build, etc.’” That memo — cited in a November 23, 1963, article in the Tampa Tribune — may no longer exist in Secret Service files. The suspect’s description in the memo matches either Gilberto Lopez (described by the FBI “23, 5 7, 125 lbs. … fair complexion”) or Lee Harvey Oswald far better than the initial description that would be issued in Dallas four days later, after JFK was shot, which put out a lookout for a thirty-five-year-old man. The article also quoted Mullins as saying that there were two people involved in the threat, and “he did not know if the other two may have followed” JFK “to Dallas.” (4) Just as in Chicago, there were two suspects on the loose prior to a JFK motorcade — only this time, on this day, there could be no cancellation if JFK were going to convey a convincing image of strength to the C-Day coup leader in Cuba.

More information about the threat comes from Secret Service files that still existed in the late 1970s. Some of those found by a Congressional investigator “made it clear that the threat on Nov. 18, 1963 was posed by a mobile, unidentified rifleman shooting from a window in a tall building with a high power rifle fitted with a scope.” There are two highly unusual things about the information in that Secret Service memo. First is how closely the timing and wording in that memo matches a long-secret internal CIA memo from November 19, 1963, in which Desmond FitzGerald “approved telling [Rolando] Cubela he would be given … high powered rifles w/scopes” in a weapons cache. As noted earlier, providing those weapons would have been the job of David Morales, who was also in position to know about the plot of Rosselli and the other mob bosses to kill JFK. One can only imagine the reaction of FitzGerald and Helms if JFK had been killed in Tampa by the type of weapon they were going to provide to Cubela — or how they felt when they heard how JFK had been shot in Dallas with a “high powered rifle” with a scope, at the very moment their agent was meeting with Cubela in Paris.

Second, even when one of the Secret Service agents who wrote the memos was shown a copy, Congressional investigators say he “experienced difficulty in recalling detailed information of any kind” and had “virtually complete loss of memory,” saying he “had ‘no recall’ of these facts even when his own recollection was refreshed by his own memoranda.” (5) Just like the Chicago attempt, information about Tampa would be covered by an intense veil of official secrecy. Secret Service agent deFreese was willing to admit to Congressional investigators that “a threat did surface in connection with” JFK’s Florida trip and “there was an active threat against the President of which the Secret Service was aware in November 1963 in the period immediately prior to JFK’s trip to Miami made by ‘a group of people.’” However, he focused only on the Miami part of JFK’s trip, not on Tampa. (6) In the 1990s, the Secret Service agent who drove the car immediately behind JFK in Tampa (and Dallas), Sam Kinney, told researcher Vince Palamara that the threat that day had “something to do with organized crime” and “one of the unions.” (7) Santo Trafficante controlled organized crime in Tampa and most of south Florida, and, as we know now, Teamster head Jimmy Hoffa was backing Trafficante’s plot to kill JFK.

In his first interview about the subject since 1963, former Tampa Police Chief J.P. Mullins confirmed the existence of the plot to us in 1996. He indicated that it wasn’t a far-right threat that was based on the Milteer information, which he didn’t recall having been shared with the Tampa police. Chief Mullins also said that they had not been told about the recent Chicago plot to kill JFK. However, when given the full names of the two men linked to Gilberto Lopez whose last names were Rodriguez and Gonzales, Mullins thought they sounded familiar, but he couldn’t say for sure. He recalled that no suspects were arrested that day, but said that if a suspect wasn’t taken “into custody on some legal pretext, they’d keep them under surveillance,” echoing what happened to Vallee and the other suspects in Chicago. He said that since “they were worried about the guy who fit the description in the newspaper” article, it was more likely that suspects “were kept under surveillance.” He said that “the Secret Service gave us names to watch for, and our own Intelligence Unit had names to watch for,” but Oswald’s name “wasn’t on any [watch] list.”(8)

Mullins described Trafficante as “their main mobster,” and he said that in general they “tried to keep the heat and surveillance on him,” which eventually caused Trafficante to spend more time in Miami, away from Tampa. Mullins was familiar with Trafficante’s attorney, Frank Ragano. Mullins had become police chief again just weeks before JFK’s motorcade, after having been replaced for a time by Chief Neil Brown, whose Senate testimony from September 1963 we cited earlier. Mullins had a good reputation for being honest and against the Mafia. He had been acting chief in 1958 and full chief in 1960, before being dropped back to number two under a new mayor. When the mayor changed again, Mullins became chief again. However, local politics would cause back-and-forth changes in the Tampa Police Department’s leadership that would eventually lead to the files about the Tampa threat being destroyed. Under Mullins, the Tampa PD had “huge files on Trafficante” (with a code like “CI-60,” because they began in 1960), and files on the Tampa JFK attempt. But eventually, another official told us that a new Tampa mayor and his new police chief had those files “destroyed … so they couldn’t be subpoenaed” by any of the JFK investigating committees.(9)

Regarding the Tampa motorcade, Mullins said a “Secret Service agent told him it was the President’s longest exposure in the US — the only one longer was in Berlin.” JFK’s motorcade was scheduled to go from MacDill Air Force Base to Al Lopez Field, then to downtown Tampa and the National Guard Armory, then to the International Inn, and finally back to MacDill. According to an article about the motorcade, “the Tampa police alone supplied 200 of the department’s approximately 270 uniformed force.” In addition, “four hundred men from federal law enforcement agencies such as the US Air Force also saw duty,” including “law enforcement officers from the state, six counties, and the cities of St. Petersburg and Clearwater.” (10) With a total of six hundred trained professionals guarding JFK, it’s clear how serious the security concerns were.

One of those other officials also spoke to us about the Tampa threat. Chief Mullins was eighty-two when we spoke to him, but he was still alert, and he recalled the key points of that historic day. But he felt that this other individual might remember more, since he was several years younger than Mullins, and he suggested that we talk to him. Mullins vouched for this official’s honesty and integrity, which we were able to confirm, along with the official’s position in 1963. The official was active in the fight against the Mafia in Florida, so he would prefer to remain anonymous. This high Florida law-enforcement official was “convinced there was going to be a hit in Tampa” against JFK on November 18, 1963.

Like Mullins, the Florida official said that he and his agency hadn’t been told about the Chicago attempt. The official recalled that one of the three places that especially concerned the Secret Service was a bridge, though he didn’t understand why at the time. Once we informed him that Chicago newsmen had told a former Senate investigator that the Chicago plot involved a “planned assassination attempt from one of the overpasses,” the official said he finally understood the Secret Service’s concern about the bridge. (11) The other two places the Secret Service was concerned about were “a place where gangsters hung out” and the Floridian Hotel (sometimes referred to as the Grand Floridian).


Photo by Chris Barrows

During the threat against JFK’s Tampa motorcade on Nov. 18, 1963, authorities were especially concerned about this building, overlooking a left turn that would slow JFK’s motorcade. The Floridian Hotel (shown as it looks today) was the tallest building in Tampa at the time.

Chief Mullins had told us that the Floridian Hotel was a special problem, because “it was the tallest building in town at the time” — and yet JFK’s motorcade had to make a hard left turn right in front of it. That would slow the motorcade to a crawl in front of a tall, red-brick building with dozens of unguarded windows, in the days when hotel windows weren’t sealed shut. Mullins said for the other tall buildings — he recalled a couple of “bank buildings” in particular — “his men went through looking for anything unusual” and would sometimes “leave an officer posted [there].” However, as the tallest hotel in town — with a great view overlooking JFK’s motorcade route — the hotel was going to be packed with visitors on Monday, November 18, making security extremely difficult. Aside from all the windows, there was all the luggage that could contain weapons, and in those days using an alias or fake ID to register was incredibly easy. So Mullins said he depended on hotel staff to keep him abreast of any suspicious or strange people. (12) The Florida official confirmed Mullins’s account, but still thought the hotel would have been an ideal place from which assassins could shoot at JFK.

The Florida official recalled being briefed about the minor threat regarding the jailed businessman, but said it was different from the main threat, which he implied was connected at the time somehow to Cubans or the local chapter of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee (FPCC). He said anti-Castro groups were not that big in Tampa, because Castro was relatively popular and had many supporters who weren’t Communists. He said the Tampa police received no security help from Cuban exiles, in the way Harry Williams and some other exiles had assisted in Miami. Mullins said that a group of anti-Castro Cubans had “asked for a permit to demonstrate during JFK’s motorcade, but” Mullins “turned them down.” Instead, the exiles were content to run an ad in Monday’s newspaper condemning JFK.

The high Florida law-enforcement official identified the full name of a man linked to Gilberto Lopez and the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, who “was watched closely in conjunction with JFK’s visit.” The man’s last name was “Rodriguez.” The official was aware of Gilberto Lopez — whom he called “Gilbert” — and “thought he was an informant” for some agency. However, he didn’t connect Lopez at the time to the JFK threat; that would come later, after JFK’s death, when the FBI and others began investigating Lopez.

It’s unclear when Bobby Kennedy learned about the Tampa threat; but on Monday morning, November 18, it is clear that he certainly had a lot on his plate. After dealing with Harry and Artime the previous day, he would be anxious about how the C-Day coup leader would receive the special message for him in the speech JFK was giving in Miami that night. In addition, Bobby’s war against the Mafia was reaching a crucial stage. Richard Mahoney wrote that “on Monday, November 18, the last week of the trial to deport Carlos Marcello for good began” and “Bobby was monitoring it closely.” There would be meetings later in the week with many of his Justice Department prosecutors, to map out strategy against Trafficante and other mob bosses. Also, Monday had seen the first of a major five-part series in the New York Times about the ties between the Mafia, Hoffa’s Teamsters, and Las Vegas. The Times’s investigation had been supported by Bobby, who had provided crucial information and quotes. Bobby was no doubt aware that in a separate story, the previous day’s Times had spotlighted the Mafia ties of one of JFK’s potential rivals, when it reported that “Sen. Goldwater admits association with Willie Bioff, labor racketeer slain in 1955 and Gus Greenbaum, gambler slain in 1958,” ties that are “divulged in forthcoming book ‘The Green Felt Jungle’ by Ed Reid and Ovid Demaris.” Bobby would have known that both the Bioff and Greenbaum murders had ties to Johnny Rosselli. Somewhere amidst all those items on Bobby’s agenda would have been the news of the Tampa threat. Bobby of course knew about the Chicago threat and cancellation, as well as the Cuban Contingency Planning. He also knew how important that Monday’s events were to JFK and to C-Day, but it’s not known what — if any — advice he gave to JFK about the Tampa threat. All that is known is what JFK did in response to the threat.

The Florida official confirmed that “JFK had been briefed he was in danger.” (13) However, JFK knew that he couldn’t afford to cancel another motorcade so soon after Chicago without raising suspicion. Plus, he couldn’t afford to appear weak on the day that he needed to project an image of strength and confidence, along with the message written for the C-Day coup leader in Cuba. Canceling the motorcade simply wasn’t an option. JFK was set to use the same limousine he was scheduled to use in Dallas, the SS-100- X, but he knew that the “bubble-top” occasionally used during inclement weather wasn’t bulletproof; also, using it wouldn’t send the message he wanted (any photos of his motorcade would be sent to the coup leader). So JFK decided to proceed with the motorcade as planned, in an open car.

JFK must have been under enormous stress, and it showed. The Secret Service had told the Florida official that JFK was not well, and he told us that that was quite evident. At least the first stop was MacDill Air Force Base, which was very secure, with newspapers saying that “more than half of the 150 Air Police were detailed to the President’s visit.” (14) While there, JFK had his “secret session” with the Strike Force Commander, as well as with commanders of the Tactical Air and Continental Army units brought in from Virginia for the session. (15)

While JFK was at the secure military base, the Secret Service and other agencies tried to ensure JFK’s safety on his upcoming motorcade through downtown Tampa. The Miami Secret Service office had police informant William Somersett call Joseph Milteer at his Georgia home, just to make sure that he was there and not in Tampa. As Mullins would later tell the Tampa Tribune for their small article following JFK’s death, “Tampa police and Secret Service agents scanned crowds for a man who had vowed to assassinate the President here.” (16) One of the few surviving Secret Service documents about the Tampa motorcade — since it was provided to Congressional investigators — says that “underpasses [were] controlled by police and military units, [while the] Sheriff’s office secured the roofs of major buildings in the downtown and suburban areas.” (17) According to the St. Petersburg Times, a local dignitary in the motorcade “recalls that ‘it was weird being in the motorcade and we commented at every overpass [that] there were police officers with rifles on alert.’” (18)

The main motorcade would last about forty minutes, and would make the left turn in front of the Floridian Hotel at approximately 2:30 P.M. before going over a bridge to the Armory, where JFK would give another speech. JFK didn’t have Jackie accompanying him, as she would in Dallas, and it must have been very tense being alone and aware that assailants were at large among the teeming crowds. Tampa was considered the Deep South at that time; but, as in Dallas, the crowds were large and enthusiastic for JFK. To aid with security and scan the throngs, two Secret Service agents, Don Lawton and Charles Zboril, rode on the back of JFK’s limousine much of the time.

Photos of the Tampa motorcade show that for much of it, JFK stood up in the limousine. It certainly made for great photos, but it also made him an easy target. It’s unclear whether he was doing that to send a message, whether it was because of his back problems, or whether he didn’t want the Secret Service agents towering over him much of the time. Regardless, it was a courageous thing to do under those tense circumstances. A man later recalled for the St. Petersburg Times that he remembered “how concerned everyone was when [Kennedy] stood up in the car as he rode through the streets of Tampa.” (19)

One can only imagine what JFK must have thought when “someone from the crowd threw” a “small, cylindrical red item “at the motorcade” that “landed with a ‘thud’ on the hood of the Secret Service follow-up car. Thinking it could be a lethal stick of dynamite, Agent Emory Roberts pushed the object forcefully off the hood” of the follow-up limo. As noted by researcher Vince Palamara, when they realized that the object was a “‘Powerhouse’ candy bar … Roberts and the other agents shared a laugh.” (20)

In contrast to the concern about the threat, accounts of the day say “it was the kind of day the Chamber of Commerce prays for: blue skies, balmy breezes, lots of sunshine,” which sounds very much like the way it would be in Dallas four days later. JFK made it past the Floridian without incident and gave his speeches at the Armory and, later, the International Inn for the United Steelworkers Union. After one speech, newspaper reports say that “as soon as the President finished his talk, he surged out into the crowd, which immediately engulfed him. The Secret Service men with him went crazy.” (21)

In spite of the pressure he must have been under, from both the threat and his packed schedule, JFK remained gracious, with the charm that had captured much of the nation. According to one account, when JFK walked into the International Inn he “was immediately spotted by a bellboy who yelled, ‘This way, Mr. President.’ Kennedy immediately went over and shook hands with several bellboys and clerks at the desk.” (22) As his time in Tampa drew to a close, back at MacDill, a member of the Tampa police motorcycle detail told the St. Petersburg Times that “Chief of Police J.P. Mullins introduced each of us to the President,’” who was no doubt grateful that he had survived the motorcade unharmed. (23)

JFK didn’t realize that just as in Chicago, someone in law enforcement in the TampaSt. Petersburg area was feeding information to the mob bosses involved in the assassination plot. This mob lawman actually had a position very similar to that of Richard Cain. According to the high Florida law-enforcement source, the mob’s lawman was not a “made” member of the Mafia like Cain, but openly boasted of his ties to the Mafia and was feeding information to Trafficante at the time. The Florida official thought it likely that the mob lawman could have tipped Trafficante off that the threat had been uncovered. Later, the Florida official heard rumors that the hit for Tampa had been cancelled because some of the older dons in the local Mafia had worried that killing JFK there would bring down too much heat on their operations. (24) Of course, Trafficante would have also known that there was still one more chance to kill JFK, in Marcello’s territory of Dallas.

After JFK’s death, the Florida official tried to run down reports of Jack Ruby being in Tampa, but couldn’t confirm anything. He later came to believe that Frank Fiorini had had some type of involvement in the JFK assassination. His agency eventually had an “inches-thick file” on the motorcade security preparations and the JFK assassination investigation, though it was later destroyed, as was the information that the Tampa police had compiled under Chief Mullins. (25)

Mullins said they provided much information to the FBI at the time of the Tampa threat. Those documents have never surfaced in declassified FBI files. After Gilberto Lopez became a suspect in JFK’s assassination, the FBI documents released about him to date don’t even answer such basic investigative questions as whether Lopez was at work on the day JFK was in Tampa. In contrast, files from the Tampa FBI office reviewed at the National Archives contain many pages of transcripts of bugged telephone calls involving casual Tampa acquaintances of Lopez. These imply a much more intense FBI interest and investigation than the declassified Lopez documents indicate. (26)

Chicago Secret Service agent Abraham Bolden told us that he had been told about the Tampa threat. (27) It makes sense that the Chicago office would be told, in light of the very similar threat there just sixteen days earlier. It would be logical to check the Tampa details and suspects against those in Chicago, but no Secret Service documents about that have been uncovered. In fact, no Secret Service documents about the main Tampa threat have ever been released, aside from a few references in reports by HSCA investigators in the late 1970s. Even those were always assumed by the investigators to refer only to Joseph Milteer, since the HSCA was never told about the main Tampa threat. In fact, Milteer himself commented on the aborted hit to Miami police informant William Somersett, after JFK’s death. Somersett told investigators that Milteer “said that Kennedy could have been killed” on his trip to Florida, “but somebody called the FBI and gave the thing away, and of course, he was well guarded and everything went ‘pluey,’ and everybody kept quiet and waited for Texas.” (28)

Once in Miami, JFK was ready to give his important speech to the Inter-American Press Association, with its special message to the C-Day coup leader. JFK said:

“The genuine Cuban revolution, because it was against the tyranny and corruption of the past, had the support of many whose aims and concepts were democratic. But that hope for freedom was destroyed.

“The goals proclaimed in the Sierra Maestra were betrayed in Havana. (29)

“It is important to restate what now divides Cuba from my country and from the other countries of this hemisphere. It is the fact that a small band of conspirators has stripped the Cuban people of their freedom and handed over the independence and sovereignty of the Cuban nation to forces beyond the hemisphere. They have made Cuba a victim of foreign imperialism, an instrument of the policy of others, a weapon in an effort dictated by external powers to subvert the other American republics.

“This, and this alone, divides us.

“As long as this is true, nothing is possible. Without it, everything is possible. Once this barrier is removed, we will be ready and anxious to work with the Cuban people in pursuit of those progressive goals which a few short years ago stirred their hopes and the sympathy of many people throughout the hemisphere.

“No Cuban need feel trapped between dependence on the broken promises of foreign Communism and the hostility of the rest of the hemisphere. For, once Cuban sovereignty has been restored, we will extend the hand of friendship and assistance to a Cuba whose political and economic institutions have been shaped by the will of the Cuban people.” (30)

The audience received JFK politely; but, as we noted earlier, Richard Goodwin told us that it really wasn’t JFK’s type of audience. But unknown to Goodwin, the audience that JFK really wanted to reach was ninety miles away, in Cuba. Now, JFK, Bobby, and Harry would have to see if the message had been what the C-Day coup leader wanted to hear.

The following day’s headlines are notable both for what they say and what they don’t say. First, several newspapers seem to pick up very well on what JFK had been trying to get across — in some cases, almost too well. For example, the November 19, 1963 Dallas Times-Herald headlined their UPI story with “Kennedy Virtually Invites Cuban Coup.” The story said that in his Miami speech the previous day, “President Kennedy all but invited the Cuban people today to overthrow Fidel Castro’s Communist regime and promised prompt US aid if they do. Kennedy’s encouragement of a Cuban coup was contained in a major foreign policy speech. … The President said it would be a happy day if the Castro government is ousted.”

Some other newspapers also had provocative headlines based on the same UPI story, saying “Kennedy Encourages Cuba Coup” and “Says US will Aid in Ouster.” (31) While headlines like those ensured that the coup leader in Cuba would get the intended message, they made JFK’s carefully crafted words almost too clear. However, most newspapers were more restrained in their headlines and stories. The New York Times, for example, headlined theirs a more restrained “Kennedy says US will aid Cuba once Cuban sovereignty is restored under a non-Communist government.” (32)

The headlines on November 19, 1963 were also notable for what they lacked: any mention of the main Tampa threat. Even in the local Tampa-area newspapers, there was no mention of it. We confirmed this by scanning microfilm of every edition on that day and those that followed (in the early 1960s, newspapers sometimes went through three or more editions each day). No story about the main Tampa threat appeared while JFK was alive.

Concerns about the Tampa threat had been broad enough that surely it must have caught the attention of some reporters. Even if only a few dozen of the six hundred officials and officers helping with security knew anything of substance about the threat, it’s difficult to imagine that one wouldn’t have told a journalist or reporter. Especially since the motorcade had gone so well, it would be logical for some official to boast about the good job dealing with the threat, or even more logical for officials to widely publicize the description of the two suspects who were at large. But neither happened, probably for the same reason that there was no publicity about the four-man Chicago threat, even though several Chicago newsmen knew about it at the time.

For Bobby Kennedy and the other officials working on C-Day, there were too many other considerations to allow the threat to be publicized. The possible Cuban connection that our high Florida law-enforcement source was told about shows how any public investigation could bring unwanted attention to any connections that pro-Castro or anti-Castro suspects might have. If pro-Castro suspects were publicly announced or uncovered, would the C-Day coup leader worry that Castro had uncovered his role and was retaliating? What if an investigation accidentally uncovered exiles working for Artime or one of the other C-Day exile groups? That could also lead to embarrassing questions from the media at a critical time. As was probably a consideration in the Cuba Contingency Planning, any further investigations of the Tampa threat were probably done very quietly and in secret, and any news and publicity about it was avoided.

In hindsight, the tragedy in such an approach is apparent. If the Dallas police had known about Tampa, they no doubt would have prepared their security very differently. Even if they’d only been informed after the assassination, at least they would have investigated the case far differently. If the public had known what almost happened in Tampa, they would have been even more skeptical of the official version of events in Dallas. Most of all, if the Tampa threat had been exposed in the press, it’s hard to imagine that the mob bosses would have proceeded with basically the same plan just four days later.

There were only faint echoes of the events of November 18, 1963 in the days to come. On November 19, the CIA took advantage of JFK’s message for the C-Day coup leader by using it to encourage their AMTRUNK agents in Cuba. They sent one of them a secret message “asking that he tune into Radio Americas a Voz del Jercito Rebelde all nights except Sundays” because it “would carry two major guarantees from U.S. govt. Program was designed to inspire rebel army to unite and rise in coup against Fidel.” (33) Apparently, the broadcast was going to include JFK’s speech or a report about it. As mentioned earlier, on November 22 in Paris, a CIA agent would tell Rolando Cubela (AMLASH) that the crucial part of the speech had been meant for him.

The following day, the first of two small newspaper articles finally slipped through in the Tampa Tribune. Quoted earlier, it apparently caught the attention of other reporters. The following day in the Miami Herald, an article quoted a small part of the Tribune article and tried to advance the story. But “when asked to comment on published reports that the Secret Service had alerted local authorities that an assassination attempt might be made on Mr. Kennedy when he visited here last Monday,” they only “drew a ‘no comment’” from officials. (34) No further stories about the threat appeared in either paper, even though both papers were filled with many other stories about JFK and the assassination for weeks to come.

We noted earlier the stonewalling that Congressional investigators faced from the Secret Service about the threat in the late 1970s, and the document destruction that occurred after we first told the JFK Assassination Records Review Board about Tampa. In addition, the Review Board’s Final Report stated that “the Secret Service ‘was a very difficult agency to work with,’ said a Board member … ‘they seemed to believe that terrible things would happen if they released documents.’” Another staff member told the Board, “Some agencies were more cooperative than others. Secret Service was the most difficult. They were a brick wall. They destroyed records after the law was passed.” (35) We feel that this shows how sensitive C-Day, and the security precautions to protect it and its participants, were — not just in 1963, but for decades to come. Unfortunately, the secrecy at the time — which was not just the responsibility or decision of the Secret Service, but which must have had the approval of JFK and Bobby — allowed the mob bosses to regroup and try once more, in Dallas.

Excerpted with permission from “Ultimate Sacrifice: John and Robert Kennedy, the Plan for a Coup in Cuba, and the Murder of JFK.” By Lamar Waldron with Thom Hartmann. Carroll & Graf Publishers.

Continue Reading Close