Lea Lane

The husband we shared

Carole and I only met twice. I never suspected how our lives would intersect

The slim, dark-haired woman sitting at the table in the Westchester brasserie was reading “Pride and Prejudice.” That was a predictor of a potential friendship, but our lives would eventually intersect in ways we could never have dreamed.

But this was how it began.

“You’re reading one of my favorite books,” I said, introducing myself. “You must be Carole.”

A mutual friend had set us up. “There’s a new family in town,” she told me, “and the wife really misses the city. Invite her to lunch. She’s a writer. You’ll have a lot in common.”

Really? I was a homemaker, wife of a professor, mother of two young boys. I freelanced some, and lived a comfortable, rather solitary life in a stone house on a rolling piece of land with a vegetable garden and a pond. I cooked and arranged flowers, carpooled and prepared dinner parties. I had longed to live in the city but never had the opportunity.

As we nibbled leafy things, Carole and I sized each other up. She wrote short stories for Redbook. She was interested in quantum physics and psychology. Was I? Not exactly. But Pilobolus? Rauschenberg? Mahler? Yes. The chance to stretch my cultural self was stimulating, beyond my usual suburban discussions of Boy Scouts and septic tanks.

Our conversation flowed into the early afternoon, long past the hour I had planned. Besides loving Jane Austen we shared skepticism about religion, and a cannoli.

What we couldn’t possibly realize that day back in the 1970s was that we would also share something else, something much more, something completely unexpected: the same husband. A man neither of us was married to at the time, and who was that day very much married to someone else.

“I’d like to meet some interesting people,” she said after we split the check. I suggested that, despite her expressed lack of interest in organized religion, the temple up the road in Chappaqua was a good place to start.

I wrote down the names of our rabbi and a few other interesting people. “Check these out.”

A couple of weeks later Carole and I met again, in the same restaurant. ”So, what’s new,” I asked.

“Well, I went to the temple. But I wasn’t impressed.”

I figured she’d find friends another way, since religion clearly wasn’t her thing. Maybe she’d join a local writer’s group or a quantum physics/psychology discussion.

After lunch Carole invited me to see her newly purchased two-story farmhouse: small rooms and saggy stairwells on six acres, off a gentrified dirt road. A wooded hill was framed in the paned parlor windows, giving the impression that you were deep in the country, not five minutes from the Harlem train line to Manhattan. The property included a weathered red barn right off the road, a rock garden stretching across the grounds, a cozy kitchen with a painted ceramic stove, and a smudgy glass observatory. I loved it.

Carole brought me upstairs to see the wood-trimmed bedroom with its stone fireplace and adjoining office up a couple more stairs, the place where she wrote her stories. 

The visit was pleasant, and I called later and left a message suggesting that we get together sometime soon, together with our husbands. But I never heard from her again, and we fell out of touch.

I tended my gardens, my sons grew up and away, and I separated from my husband and moved to Washington, D.C., to work for and live with an Internet entrepreneur. One day I heard that Chaim Stern, my former rabbi in Chappaqua, had divorced his wife and had married a congregant.

That congregant was Carole. 

I suppose she had joined the temple after all. I found out later that her marriage had been in trouble and that she had gone to see the rabbi for pastoral counseling. She had fallen in love with him and then he had fallen in love with her, and after much soul-searching he eventually left his wife of many years and disappointed his grown sons and married Carole and moved to her house.

And I could imagine them sitting in the parlor and looking up from their books and out at that wooded hill. Both of them slim and brilliant, talking of quantum physics and the meaning of life.

More years passed, I got divorced and I broke up with the man from Washington and moved back to Westchester County. With my children now grown I traveled the world, writing about my journeys and finding ways to keep my big house and overgrown garden.

I had single friends now in the city. I had long since quit going to temple and rarely spent time with couples from my earlier life. I was thrilled that I’d started dating a nice guy, a former sports commissioner who had just brought me to his weekend house on Cape Cod. We ate a delicious meal. We talked about traveling together. Life was good.

And then on a rainy Monday I had lunch with a Chappaqua friend. “Did you hear about the rabbi’s wife, Carole?” she asked.

“No,” I said, about to explain about my two brief encounters with her those many years before.

“Well, she died.”

I felt jolted. But more than that, I rediscovered a strange, long-lost connect I’d felt to this woman I’d hardly known. And so I wrote the rabbi a condolence note, figuring that, in his mourning, my little story of how I suggested that Carole might go to the temple to meet people, and him, and her ironic response might make him smile.

And I went back to my life and my budding relationship without further thought.

Until one day the phone rang.

“This is Chaim.”

“Rabbi Stern?”

“… Chaim. I just wanted to tell you that your condolence was the one I can’t forget. It made me laugh out loud. So she wasn’t impressed with me, huh?”

That made me laugh too, nervously, and we talked quite a while and laughed quite a bit more. And we reminisced about my sons, and the 25 years since I had first joined the temple and how I was embarrassed that I was no longer a member. And, surprisingly, he didn’t seem to care, and before long he asked me out to go out for a meal with him.

And I told my friends, “Rabbi Stern asked me to dinner. I feel funny.”

And they said, “He just needs company. Go and make him feel good.”

And I said, “But I have to learn to call him Chaim.”

So we went for dinner at the restaurant where Carole and I had eaten lunch. He seemed the same as I remembered. Big grin. Big intellect. Big heart. And at the end of the meal he said, “Will you see me again?” And I thought about my new relationship and looked at Chaim’s smile, and was surprised to hear myself say, “Of course.”

Eventually I revisited the house Carole had shown me after our second lunch, the house where Chaim now lived. It looked much as it did then, a rambling old farmhouse shielded from the suburban sprawl. And as the weeks passed I cooked on the ceramic stove and as the months passed I sat in the parlor with the fireplace and the view of the hill. And I slept in the bed that I had sat on after lunch with Carole, long before even Chaim ever had.

Six months after I wrote the condolence note, Chaim Stern and I were married in front of our children, in the temple where he inspired so many through the years.

“It’s been fast,” he said in a toast right after. “But I love you. You love me. That’s all that counts.” And he was right, and we were happy, and I went to temple Friday nights from then on.

Three years and two months later Chaim was dead. And eerily, like Carole, he died too soon from cancer, on a ventilator, in an ICU.

The house with the barn and the ceramic stove was sold and razed, replaced by a grotesque McMansion. And when I drive by that new structure, I feel the end of a remarkable connection. For I had introduced Carole to Chaim that day in the restaurant when I wrote down his name. And her death, leading to my writing his name once again on the sympathy note, reintroduced him to me, in the very same restaurant.

In almost perfect synchronicity, Carole and I, non-observant Jews who hardly knew each other, were destined to become rebbitizens of the same temple: the second and third wives of the same man. And although I met her only twice, Carole and I shared much more than a love of Jane Austen and cannolis.

We shared Chaim.

What my father lost gambling

He blew money at the track and pulled me into his schemes. Our finances suffered -- and so did our relationship

I never really understood my father.

Daddy was a “professional gambler,” if betting daily on greyhounds and thoroughbreds could be considered a profession rather than an addiction. His mornings were spent at the desk in my brother’s room, hunched over the Racing Form in his robe. And most of his days and nights would be at Hialeah or Gulfstream or the Miami Beach Kennel Club, doing mysterious things that seemed to pass for his life’s work.

The only legitimate thing Daddy ever did to earn money was invest in a plot of land on nearby Di Lido Island, so when someone asked us what Daddy did for a living we were able to say he was in “real estate.” In fact, I was so prepped by Mom to say those two words that when the teacher asked my name in kindergarten, I proudly blurted “Real Estate.”

I noticed a curious thing about gamblers from an early age: Daddy didn’t get excited when he won at the track. No, the adrenaline would be flowing, the monologue would be deafening and he’d come roaring into the house, pacing up and down and yelling — when he’d almost won. And he’d be cursing when he lost.

So when he was quiet, I figured he’d won some money. He wasn’t often quiet.

The closest conversations I can remember with Daddy were at dinnertime, when he’d offer a nickel to my sister, my brother or me — whichever of us gave the best report of our school day. We competed for the 5 cents until we realized it wasn’t worth it unless he upped the payoff to a dime.

We lived in rented apartments and bungalows until one year when Daddy must have bet big on long shots in the daily double and we moved to a half-block-long, marble-floored art moderne mansion with a buzzer in the floor of the dining room to call “the Help.” The following year we were poor again, and Daddy would go into my wallet to borrow my allowance. He always said he’d pay me back, but he never did.

Our parents weren’t officially separated — almost no couples were in those days — and yet half the year they lived apart. From April to September, he holed up in a seedy Boston hotel called the Touraine where the elevator was manned by a one-legged operator. It was near the dog track at Revere.

But we didn’t see all that much of Daddy even while he was home in Miami Beach, and my brother and sister and I thought his leaving was as natural as the hurricanes that arrived in his absence.

Mom seemed happier when he left, which confused the hell out of my childhood self, who believed in sitcom family units where daddies wore suits to dinner and moms served apple pie in gingham aprons, not families where Daddy went off to work at the race track and stayed away for six months, and called to wish his daughter a happy birthday, on the wrong day, and asked, “How old are you now, Lea?” At least he got my name straight.

It did come in handy on occasion, though. After my grandfather taught me to read at 2 years old, my dad was not only proud, he figured out a way to capitalize on his “smartypants daughter.” He would use me as a shill.

So we would walk around where the tourists would hang out in South Beach. If he found someone reading the Racing Form, Daddy would say, “I’ll take out my Racing Form and you can point to something and my baby daughter will read it.”

Then the gamblers would figure he had prepped me to learn from the paper he held. They must have thought that I could memorize, but I was too young to read, and they were on to something and could make some money.

“OK,” some would say, “I’ll bet you she won’t read — and I get to choose from my form.” But I usually could read whatever they put in front of me. Often it was the name of horses, and Daddy would prep me as a game: “Murray’s Desire.” “Long Boat Key.” “Blue Dame.”

“She’s a midget,” they’d grumble, forking over a Benjamin.

Mom divorced Daddy when I was in my 20s, and for a while he lived in a small apartment by the dog track. She remarried him a year later.

Not long before his death at the age of 83, we were watching a “60 Minutes” segment together about gambling addiction. Daddy was long “retired,” but still visited the track during the day, and often gambled away his Social Security check.

After the TV segment, my dad turned to me. This was his chance to show me, finally, that he had learned something about his lifetime of ruined potential and broken relationships. A chance to say he was sorry to the daughter whom he had involved in his gambling since she was a toddler, the neglected daughter whose age he still did not know, and who very well could have been named for Hialeah Race Track.

Daddy looked at me with resignation and shame. It took him a long time to get the words out.

“That wasn’t easy to watch,” he said.

I was ready for his late epiphany, and a chance for some closure for both of us.

“It’s really too bad,” he said, staring at me with the sad look of an old man. “I mean, I know addicted gamblers like that.”

How could I possibly have understood my father when he never could understand himself?

Continue Reading Close
www.salon.com/writer/lea_lane/index.html