Lorenzo W. Milam

Tell Laura I love her

Though the national nag is snippish, overbearing and often insulting, some of us can't help but admire Schlessinger. Most of all we love her for her bubbles.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Years ago, she would have been called “a common scold.” Today, she’s deemed “a pain in the ass,” “dictatorial,” “rude,” “overemotional,” “a fraud,” “Laura the hen,” “a psychological bag lady” and “our national mommy.”

“I pretty much preach, teach and nag,” Dr. Laura Schlessinger told a reporter from the Washington Post. “It’s not pop psychology at all. If anything, it’s a new genre …”

Schlessinger can be heard three hours a day in almost every corner of America. They say that her audience exceeds 18 million on 450 radio stations and over 50 percent of her listeners are men. Fifty-thousand people try to call in each day. Her syndicated show recently sold for $71.5 million.

Schlessinger’s themes are protect the child, practice family unity, use sexual restraint, stop making excuses and don’t interrupt me. “Tell me what you think, not what you feel,” she says. “Everything I say is true,” she confesses.

She grew up in Brooklyn and on Long Island, with a Catholic mother and a Jewish father. She was a loner in high school and college, but no one could miss her intensity. She was fascinated with science, and got her Ph.D. at Columbia University.

In the midst of her divorce in 1975, she moved to Los Angeles, and tuned in to Bill Ballance and his radio talk-show. She called up during a program about divorce, and they spoke, on the air, for 20 minutes. He then arranged to meet her, using the oldest of come-hither lines, “Someday you’re going to be an international radio star.”

The radio gods must have been smiling down on her, because Ballance was the originator of a new, and rather daring, on-the-air confessional program. Before Ballance, call-ins had been people discussing their fishing trips and their kids and cats and politics of the non-confrontational variety. Then suddenly it was all love, lust and passion. Ballance, according to those who knew his show, “talked about sex incessantly.”

Dr. Norton Kristy, another on-the-air radio shrink, said the program “evolved into an invitation being extended to women to talk about their most intimate fears and hopes and issues in their lives. Bill did that. He was the first in America to do it, and within three years, he was widely copied in America and around the world.”

If Dr. Laura was seeking to become famous, she picked the right guy. If she was looking for someone who would keep her deepest secrets, she didn’t. Over the years, Ballance seems to have lost whatever little affection he had for his old squeeze. His uncensored memories of their time together have appeared in the Los Angeles Times, Vanity Fair and other newspapers and magazines. They are uniformly obnoxious, highly personal and hilarious.

For instance, there’s the matter of pet names. He called Laura his “Little Plum,” she called him her “Pillow Plumsicles.” She wrote notes to him signed, “Your Tottle Bug.” “We used to thrash around like a couple of crazed weasels,” he told Vanity Fair. He dubbed her “Ku Klux.” Why? “Because she is a wizard in the sheets.”

He didn’t limit his comments to their love affair. “We were sitting in the Musso and Frank Grill on Hollywood Boulevard one day and I said, ‘You’re scratching your head and a cloud of dandruff is floating over into my consommi.’”

“Talk about gnashing your teeth; it was an actual snarl. She said, ‘Don’t you ever tell anyone I have psoriasis.’ I said to Laura, ‘If it weren’t for your psoriasis you wouldn’t have any character at all.’

A while back, as most everyone knows by now, Ballance sold off some photographs he took of her. In the buff. These went for a pretty penny ($50,000 is the figure mentioned) to the Internet Entertainment Group. Like every other lurid thing you could possibly want — or have nightmares about — they are now online, listed as “Dr. Laura’s Dirty Dozen.” As the folks over at “Mr. Showbiz,” commented shortly after the pictures were published: “There are several frightening things you hope never to hear in life. The first might be, ‘It’s malignant.’ But the next up would have to be, “Nude pictures of Dr. Laura are now available for download.”

She calls herself Dr. Laura. But, according to the California Board of Behavioral Science Examiners, “Nobody is allowed to use ‘Doctor’ unless they are a medical doctor or … a professor in the psychological field with a clinical license.” Schlessinger has a Ph.D., but it isn’t in psychology — it’s in physiology. Her doctorate was entitled “Effects of Insulin on 3-0 Methylglucose Transport in Isolated Rat Adipocytes.” According to one of her professors, she spent most of her doctoral training time “pulling fat pads off rat testicles.”

I asked a friend of mine who works in the field what “Methylglucose Transport” is all about. He said, “It’s the standard, routine, crushingly dull thing done back in the days before DNA research. Physiology is the term used for lower-level biochemistry. However,” he concluded, “it does not sound like an obvious portal into psychology, even of the broadcast variety.”

Despite all this, and despite the fact that many consider Laura Schlessinger the dragon lady of talk radio, some of us can’t help but admire her. She is snippish, overbearing and often insulting — but anybody who has the temerity to call in to her program knows what they are going to get, especially if they plead ignorance or innocence.

Not only does Schlessinger stick it to all those tedious people who call up on the air, she does it, in spades, to those who pay for outside appearances. In 1997, she appeared before the League of Dallas at a benefit. It was a question-and-answer session. In response to what she thought was a dumb question, she said, “If you listened to my program, you’d know those are the kind of things I’m not even going to address: They are too frivolous.”

Later, at another meeting, she said, “I’m glad to be in Dallas. You look so good. I expected to find a bunch of overweight people.” Someone got up and says she wanted to know how to deal with being grandmother to “intermarried children.” Laura snapped, “My grandmother’s dead. I wouldn’t say anything because my grandmother’s dead.”

The Dallas contingent paid Dr. Laura $30,000 to come and insult them. So be it. There are some fine people out there in the world of psychotherapy, those who have rare insights into families and the theories of family therapy, those who have spent years in the trenches — people like Jay Haley, Cloe Madanes, Salvador Minuchin and Mara Selvini Palazzoli. Any organization fool enough to pay $30,000 for an appearance by a drive-time bug doctor instead of getting an honest professional for a tenth of the cost deserves, we do believe, what they get.

- – - – - – - – - – - -

Vickie Bane, the author of “Dr. Laura,” writes for People magazine, and it shows. She’s one of those writers direct from the breathless school of journalism, where a sentence, for some reason, is considered to be co-equal to a paragraph.

The book starts out with an interview with Schlessinger’s mother, who Laura hasn’t seen or called for 14 years. Bane puts it right up front. Now we know what kind of hypocrite she is, it seems to be telling us. But if Laura doesn’t necessarily practice what she preaches — who does? I’ve gone to psychotherapists who’ve had hideous family lives — brothers and sisters not speaking to each other, parents murdering each other with hate, cheatin’ husbands and wives. That didn’t stop them from encouraging me to maintain good communication with a parent or with my siblings.

Bane quotes endless nosy speculations about Laura’s psychological state-of-mind — doubtful insights not from professionals, but from other on-the-air gab-fest shrinks. “My own observations were that Laura had experienced a great deal of childhood insecurity and need,” intones Dr. Norman Kristy, who has his own on-the-air psychology pop show, “and that it had left her with a rather hard outer shell in which she was sardonic and humorous, and pretended to a degree of tough-minded strength that really did not go very deep.”

Dr. Carole Lieberman, who writes a “celebrity psychoanalysis column,” mutters darkly, “Dr. Laura has a lot of demons that are hidden, suppressed.”

Marilyn Kagan, with her own television agony show in Los Angeles, says, “[Dr. Laura] has a right to her own opinion, but the way she expresses herself is so demeaning … It supports the denial of her hostility.”

As my beloved mother would say, “Butter wouldn’t melt in her mouth.”

- – - – - – - – - – - -

Marshall McLuhan famously opined that television was a “cool” medium, while radio was a “hot tribal drum.”

“For tribal peoples, for those whose entire social existence is an extension of family life, radio will … be a violent experience,” he wrote in “Understanding Media.” “It takes cartoon characters seriously.” At the time, he was referring to Nikita Khrushchev — but if McLuhan were alive today, these cartoon figures would be the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Howard Stern, Gordon Liddy, Toni Grant, Don Imus — and Laura Schlessinger.

If you think of Dr. Laura as an expert, offering true psychological insight, forget it. She’s an expert motivational entertainer, right up there with all the other McLuhanesque drummers. Her medium is the harsh, raspy voice of AM radio. With her terse comments, her impatience with her “clients,” her famous rants — she’s perfect for the job of being the national nag.

I would also suggest that we have to love Dr. Laura not only for being so tacky, but also for having posed au naturel for an old sweetie. There are those of us out here who would give a pretty penny to have such a shrink; one with the chutzpah to strip down to nothing more than skin and bone for her honey’s camera — calling him “Your Tottle Bug” all the while.

Most of all, I believe we should love Schlessinger for her bubbles.

As Bane tells it, when Laura and her husband Lew moved to Lake Arrowhead, Calif., she bought a Cobalt — what some call “the Mercedes of speed boats.” After she got it, and more than once, according to people at the local marina, “She kept insisting there was something wrong with this boat because of the bubbles, and she wanted the owners to take it back.”

Something wrong with the bubbles?

Yeah. She said that “the bubbles that come up from the back of her boat didn’t look like everyone else’s bubbles.”

How could you not love her for that?

Suite for heartbreak and name dropping

In the midst of a deathly tome overflowing with her dratted ego, Judy Collins attempts to tell the unembellished tale of a sad death. And she pulls it off.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Famous names pop up in Judy Collins’ “Singing Lessons” like pimples on the face of a juvenile delinquent. Leonard Cohen is an old buddy; so is Mimi Fariqa. Pete Seeger lies over there asleep on the couch, tired out after so many benefits, and Joan Baez turns up at a smoky ’50s folk club. Faye Dunaway is around somewhere, along with Joan Rivers and John Denver. Joni Mitchell knows Collins well enough to say, “I don’t believe you’re still such a romantic.” And Judy Blue Eyes also runs into Bob Dylan from time to time, along with Barbara Dane and Tom Paxton — that “blue-eyed handsome singer with a sweet twang in his voice.”

Even when Collins goes to jail in protest over some crummy war, they don’t stick her in with the smelly drunks and freaked-out stoners. No, it’s Stephen Stills, Tennessee Williams, poet Kenneth Koch, “Yale President Kingman Brewster” and “author Francine du Plessix Gray,” merrily, all in the same cell together.

All the folks she’s met on the song circuit (or in the hoosegow) are the most wonderful bunch you’d ever want to hang out with. Not a creep in the pack. Josh White has “a hearty deep laughter.” Dave van Ronk has a “whiskey voice full of character.” Odetta has a “smooth-as-honey voice and a warm heart.” (She is also satisfactory in an olfactory way: “She not only sang great, but looked great — and smelled great!”)

Everyone is extraordinary, good humored, sincere, earnest or deeply moving. Even President Clinton, for God’s sake, who pops up more than once — your regular toad in the garden — has an “open, accessible personality,” a “handsome face” and “amazing gifts.” “You either have that touch of class and humanity or you don’t,” muses Collins, “and Clinton has. It is charming and unusual.”

The ostensible purpose of “Singing Lessons,” which came out in paperback this month, is to tell us the grief Collins felt at losing her only child, in 1992, to suicide. With this, at midpoint, we get into the meat of the book. All the big shots disappear for a while. We see a grief-stricken woman who has lost her grown son in a most terrible way. She tells us what suicide does to families and lovers, how people deal with it, what it does to her, what it has meant through the ages.

In ancient Greece, the idea was, “If your existence is hateful to you, die; if you’re overwhelmed by fate, drink the hemlock. If you are bowed with grief, abandon life.” Early Christians killed themselves because “heaven beckoned with salvation to the martyr.” It was St. Augustine who first described it as sin. Those who attempted suicide and failed would be executed. If you blew it, the state would finish you off.

In this day and age, survivors of a loved one’s suicide are most likely to kill themselves. Every year in the United States, 30,000 people do it, and it’s the third leading cause of death among teenagers. Since 1950, 16 million people have suffered the loss of a family member or a loved one through suicide.

“Everyone has a skeleton in their closet,” says one member of Collins’ family, “but the person who [commits suicide] leaves a skeleton in yours.” And we get this extraordinary exchange, about one of her friends:

When Pamela went to her therapist, he asked her whether, if she were serious about killing herself, she would like to write the suicide note, right there in his office. Pamela balked, said she felt like killing herself but didn’t know what to say to her family, her friends, who she would leave behind. She told him she hadn’t any idea what to say. The therapist wrote something on a scrap of paper and handed it to her.

“What about something like this?” he asked.

Pamela opened the note. “Fuck you,” it said.

Judy Collins is not the only person in the world who has lost a child — suddenly, out of the blue. One who sets out to describe such pain should be prepared to articulate, honestly, his or her own grief, and — as well — the pain of those who have come before, those who will come after. She pulls it off. In the midst of a deathly tome overflowing with her dratted ego — all those names! — she chooses to tell us, without embellishment, of a sad death. In these few pages come, too, tales of alcoholism (“the long suicide of drinking”), hideous depression, endless drugs. She, for a brief moment, lets us see the grieving mother who, no matter whose name she can conjure up, cannot be helped out of this most grievous of truths of the human condition, the maelstrom of life with its wonder and hate and love and despair — the big pie of life that, when you dig into it, has as many poisonous mushrooms as it does truffles.

“I do not give up control,” says Collins. But fortunately, at the mid-point, she decided to drop all the show-off stuff, let us in on the real grief of a real person. Alas, by Page 250, we are back at Turtle Bay, in the Caribbean, hobnobbing with Hillary and Chelsea and you-know-who. Later, he invites Collins to the White House for dinner (Hillary is away in Arkansas), and she stays over, and he takes her running the next morning, over to the Lincoln Memorial. It’s the name-drop climax of “Singing Lessons,” the very apex. You think I was high on the hog with Bob Dylan (onstage), she’s saying, and Tennessee Williams (in jail) and Duke Ellington (on his deathbed). Well, I got one for you that’ll blow your socks off.

This book comes packaged with a CD of five Collins songs. If you want to give yourself some Judy overload, put “Amazing Grace” on your player, and get down on your knees in the Oval Office with the Prez. Hillary’s out of town.

Hey! You stop that, right now. It’s not what you think. At least, we don’t think it is. They’re just examining the new “brilliantly colored circular rug with the bright eagle …” Another time, another visit, a slightly different set of circumstances — why, it could have been the biggest name-drop bomb of them all.

Continue Reading Close

Mark O'Brien: Lifestyles of the blind and paralyzed

From age 6, the writer, poet and subject of the Academy Award-winning "Breathing Lessons" had the use of just one muscle in his right foot, one muscle in his neck and one in his jaw. He used them to steer his monster machine and to bang with a stick on the keys of a computer -- to write, cajole, editorialize, storm, cry, laugh and rage.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Once, at a press conference, someone asked Eleanor Roosevelt if polio had affected her husband’s mind. There was a long pause, and she replied, yes, that it had affected his mind — it had made him more sensitive to the pain of others.

It was an artful response to a difficult question, but the truth of the matter is that polio did and does affect the mind. It made Franklin D. Roosevelt think he could run the United States for four presidential terms, through depression and war, without killing himself. And it made Mark O’Brien, who died of complications from bronchitis on July 4 at age 49, think that he — with scarcely an intact muscle in his whole body — could live independently, on his own, and at the same time be a reporter, a baseball fan, a publisher, a journalist, a social critic and a poet.

He did all these things while living alone in an apartment in Berkeley, Calif. Not content with that, he went about town on a Stanford University-built electric gurney. That gurney, with Mark lying there on his back, enclosed in a plastic bubble, was forever and a day on the streets, O’Brien guiding the machine with his foot. He would zoom down the sidewalk, run off the curb and the whole thing would topple over — dumping him out on the pavement. Somehow he would dragoon people around him into picking him up and sticking him back on his contraption, inside the cocoon, and then he would roar off again, ramming into walls and people, oblivious to the strange sight he was making in a city so used to strange sights.

That Mark was out on the streets and not hidden away in some nursing home was a testament to his Irish dander. Remember, this is a man who — since age 6 — had the use of one muscle in his right foot, one muscle in his neck and one in his jaw. That’s it. He made full use of the three. He used the foot muscle to steer his monster machine; he used the other two to bang with a stick on the keys of a computer, to write, cajole, editorialize, storm, cry, laugh and rage. You tell me he wasn’t a nut-case?

They educated him at home the first 20 years of his life and then stuck him away in a nursing home. He put up with that for a while, then one day he said, “I’m going to college.” He did, too — moved out on his own, at age 30, got his degree (in English, at the University of California, Berkeley) in five years, then started graduate school.

They should have applauded him — right? Nonsense. At one point, Social Security administrators tried to take away his benefits because he wasn’t keeping “appropriate records” pertaining to his attendants. They made him go through an extended hearing to keep his $400 a month. Your tax dollars at work.

- – - – - – - – - – - -

O’Brien’s special gift, I suspect, was his heart-stopping honesty. He wrote an article for a book of mine about sex and disability (“CripZen: A Manual for Survival”), and I felt his personal revelations — about masturbation — were dandy but, well, a bit too personal. I asked if he didn’t want to use a pseudonym. He wouldn’t hear of it.

And when he finally, at age 36, had his first taste of love, with a sex surrogate, he wrote a long article about it that was published in several places, including the Sun magazine of North Carolina. The paragraph about looking at himself in the mirror always struck me as being one of the most poignant in all of disabled literature:

After she got off the mattress, she took a large mirror out of her tote bag. It was about two feet long and framed in wood. Holding it so that I could see myself, Cheryl asked what I thought of the man in the mirror. I said that I was surprised I looked so normal, that I wasn’t the horribly twisted and cadaverous figure I had always imagined myself to be. I hadn’t seen my genitals since I was six years old. That was when polio struck me, shriveling me below my diaphragm in such a way that my view of my lower body had been blocked by my chest. Since then, that part of me had seemed unreal.

He was honest about his sexuality — and equally honest about his loneliness, which for most of the disabled is a harsh fact of life. (There will always be something very bittersweet about the ad he posted on his
home page: “I am looking for an intelligent, literate woman for companionship and, perhaps, sexual play. I am, as you see, completely paralyzed, so there will be no walks on the beach.”)

- – - – - – - – - – - -

O’Brien left some fine presents for us. Not the anger, which made him write, “God damn this wall I cannot punch God damn this bat I cannot swing God damn this eucalyptus leaf I cannot pull down off a tree and hold up to my lover’s nose.” No, his gift for us was not rage — for that’s something that runs heavy and fast in the blood of all his disabled brethren. Nor was it something they call “courage.” “Saying a disabled person is courageous,” he once wrote me, “is like saying that a black person has natural rhythm.”

Once O’Brien did an interview with physicist Stephen Hawking. As he was waiting, some ninny from PBS came up and asked Mark if seeing Hawking gave him hope. He wrote, “This struck me as an awfully stupid question. Hope for what? Could Dr. Hawking change my life, make me walk, get me a lover? I tried to think of a polite way to answer her. I just didn’t want to get sucked into being cast as a Spokesperson for the Disabled in a dreary story headlined ‘Disabled Inspired by Dr. Hawking.’”

I suspect that the thing we should most value Mark for, outside of his appealing (and sometime appalling) honesty, was his chutzpah. I am thinking about the way the interview with Hawking came about. Mark set the whole thing up, and somehow got his dreadful space-age gurney maneuvered into the meeting hall at UC-Berkeley where the physicist was appearing. I can almost picture it now. Hawking in his little chair, with his motionless face and his typing-talking machine; O’Brien laid out flat on his back on his gurney, his face pressed to the side, his voice barely audible:

O’Brien: Do you ever feel frustration, rage at being disabled?

Hawking: No.

O’Brien: Does your work help you to deal with these feelings?

Hawking: Yes. I have been lucky. I don’t have anything to be angry about.

Pure O’Brien. He wasn’t interested in the stars, or in time, or even in the history of time. He was trying to get Hawking to talk about his feelings — to talk about this astonishing thing that had happened to his body, and what it did to his psyche. For O’Brien, and I, and all our disabled friends know that there is no one in the world, not even a mental giant like Hawking, who can lose the use of his body without having it resonate powerfully in the soul.

O’Brien: Dr. Hawking, what can you say to all the disabled people who are stuck in nursing homes or living with their parents or in some other untenable situation and who feel that their life is over, that they have no future?

O’Brien later wrote, “As I heard this long question unravel like an ill-mannered ball of yarn, Hawking continued to look at me and typed his answer into the voice synthesizer. I couldn’t see his right hand, the one he used to type. I waited. All of us waited. Then the silence was cracked by the voice synthesizer’s crisp, booming voice.”

Hawking: It can be very difficult. I know that I was very fortunate. All I can say is that one must do the best one can in the situation in which one finds oneself.

The good doctor left him in the lurch, didn’t he? Refused to show even a teeny bit of what they call “emotion” or “feeling.” O’Brien blew it, didn’t he? Maybe. Except for the fact that those of us who have long ago penetrated that ghastly myth of disabled courage against all odds know that O’Brien was onto something — something to teach the teacher. Something that (perhaps) Hawking, if he is lucky, has, by now, finally figured out: It hurts. And there doesn’t have to be any shame in that hurt.

- – - – - – - – - – - -

If we were to do something silly like try to create an epitaph for Mark, I probably would not dwell on his books, or his angry articles about Jack Kevorkian, or his fine baseball stories, or even the 1997 Oscar — that wonderful present for him and Jessica Yu, who directed the documentary film “Breathing Lessons: The Life and Work of Mark O’Brien.”

I would, rather, choose to engrave, on the stone, a poem — one he wrote 10 years ago, titled, with typical (and delicious) O’Brien-esque irony: “Lifestyles of the Blind and Paralyzed”:

The pay is lousy,
no vacations or sick leave,
and the compliments …
You’d rather do without them.

On the plus side,
you’re exempt from military service,
get to watch lots of TV
and pay half price at the movies.

They’re out there, my public,
dying to ask me what happened to you,
wondering how I pee
and using me as proof

that God is just
and punishes only the wicked.

Continue Reading Close

Page 2 of 2 in Lorenzo W. Milam