<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mark Gimein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/mark_gimein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Competitive strategy is not an end in itself&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/matteucci/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/matteucci/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/view/2000/01/04/matteucci</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HearMe&#039;s Paul Matteucci talks about the future, the Stanford mafia and what Silicon millionaires are going to do with their money.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n the age of the Internet insta-millionaire, it's easy to forget that the dot-com explosion is fueled not just by wide-eyed visionaries bobsledding their way to Net riches and programmers working through marathon coding sessions, but by seasoned strategists who remember what the business world was like before there even was an Internet.</p><p>Paul Matteucci, CEO of HearMe.com, has worked in Silicon Valley since the mid-1980s. He spent years studying and managing the workings of computer-hardware companies like Tandem and Adaptec before teaming up in 1996 with Brian Apgar, an engineer, and Brian Moriarty, a game designer, to launch Mpath, a company that let gamers play strategy and shoot'em-up games over the Net. Since then, he's deftly steered the company through a series of big changes that included changing its main line of business from games to voice-enabled chat sites -- the Web's much-more-sophisticated answer to the telephone party line -- and a corresponding name change to Hearme.com. And, naturally, he's taken it through that key Silicon Valley rite of passage for both company and chief executive -- the public offering.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/matteucci/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/matteucci/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictions for 2000</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2000/01/04/predictions</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cowhide computers, Russians in Redmond and other tech possibilities for the new year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>echnology has permeated most every aspect of our lives -- but the engineers and entrepreneurs who've introduced us to such innovative masterpieces as <a target="new" href="http://www.sony.co.jp/soj/aibo/index.html">robotic dogs</a> and <a href="/may97/21st/articleb970501.html">Bob</a> are tireless. Looking forward to a new year that will surely bring further evidence of their ceaseless creativity, we hereby salute some great ideas for the future.</p><p><b>Computer couture</b></p><p>As we leave the gray depths of the 20th century for the <a target="/21st/feature/1998/08/cov_27feature.html">Bondi Blue</a> sky of a radiant future, we'll be thinking <i>really</i> different. Look for beige computer boxes to be replaced by a rainbow of colors, as computer manufacturers partner with candy and cereal makers. Don't be surprised when Dell starts a Froot Loops line and Emachines, furiously looking for the Gen-Y angle, starts selling a Pentium III-powered Starburst line. Big Blue, of course, will launch a new line of ThinkPads in five tangy flavors: blueberry, blueberry, blueberry, blueberry and, yes, blueberry.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/predictions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft, Mahir and money, money, money</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/15/best_35/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/15/best_35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/1999/12/15/best</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A software superpower is declared a monopoly, free software rakes in billions and money makes the world go round: The year in tech.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>F</b>orget the coming-out parties of years past. In 1999, the Net grew up and went to work -- and its long-standing promise to change the way we do business became an inescapable reality. While the year was thin on technological breakthroughs -- with mammoth influences like America Online, AT&amp;T and Microsoft focused on politics (whether to compete or cooperate with each other) rather than innovation -- e-commerce took off. Online retailers selling everything from kitty litter and canned tuna to diamond rings, fine art and haute couture blanketed the Web, while a slew of dot-com companies forged a path toward pay-per-use software rentals, business-to-business auctions of surplus supplies and, of course, comparison-shopping services. No matter how many ideas Net companies came up with, there weren't enough to go around, leaving clusters of nearly identical businesses sprouting up like mushrooms after a rain. We've seen this competitive landscape before -- when hundreds of Internet service providers, or a dozen search engines, or a couple of browsers battled it out -- and we don't think we're going out on a limb when we say consolidation could be the watchword next year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/15/best_35/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/15/best_35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dissecting the VA Linux IPO</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/10/va_linux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/10/va_linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 1999 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/12/10/va_linux</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its stock soared 698 percent on opening day -- but does that mean investors really believe it&#039;s got a gilded future?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>s absolutely everyone who has been following the markets knows, the stock of <a target="new" href="http://www.valinux.com">VA Linux,</a> a builder of powerful Intel-based servers tailored to run the Linux operating system, skyrocketed on Thursday to close $239 a share, an astounding 698 percent gain on its first day of trading. Early in the day, it went as high as $320.</p><p>Investors, including a few lucky E-Trade account holders, who got shares at the offering price of $30 a share whooped with joy. Meanwhile, other observers gasped in horror. Stock message boards on discussion sites like <a target="new" href="http://www.ragingbull.com">Raging Bull</a> and <a target="new" href="http://www.techstocks.com">Silicon Investor</a> were filled with posts expressing astonishment that anyone would pay this price for a hardware company with $17 million in sales last year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/10/va_linux/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/10/va_linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dot-com dogs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/09/ipo_dogs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/09/ipo_dogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/1999/12/09/ipo_dogs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Net-stock fever showing no signs of cooling, mediocre IPOs are growing as plentiful as fleas on a stray hound.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"<b>G</b>oing public," circa 1990: Build a company with substantial revenues and growing profits. Sell shares in it to investors who hope it will grow even bigger.</p><p>"Going public," circa 1999: Start a company, add a ".com" to the name, sell shares in it to investors who hope to make a quick killing before the Net frenzy ends.</p><p>There is hardly an investor who does not profess to believe that the frenzy for Internet stocks is a bubble waiting to burst. Yet the dot-com stock fever continues unabated. In November alone, 40 companies filed documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission announcing their intention to go public. Most are building their businesses around the Net, or at least claiming to.</p><p>Surely, not every firm that can boast of some relationship to the Net deserves a stratospheric valuation. Yahoo's market capitalization -- the total value of its stock -- is now over $80 billion. That's more than Disney -- a huge media conglomerate that owns a television network, movie studios, and, yes, its own Web portal. A share of Yahoo now costs over $300, and for each share Yahoo earned all of<br />
25 cents in its last quarter. That leaves a ridiculous amount of ground for Yahoo to cover before its stock becomes a sensible purchase by any traditional metric.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/09/ipo_dogs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/09/ipo_dogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The free PC is dead! Long live the free PC!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/03/free_pc_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/03/free_pc_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/12/03/free_pc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By driving the price of low-end computers to near zero, the free-PC movement is driving itself to near extinction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>E</b>arlier this year, when a slew of companies started talking about <a href="/tech/feature/1999/08/19/free_pc/index.html">giving away PCs,</a> hard-nosed editorial writers recoiled in horror. "There's no free lunch," they said in near unison; "you lose money on every computer, and you sure can't make it up on volume." PC World said most of the free PCs were too slow. BusinessWeek dissected an eMachines computer -- a system that was not free, but very cheap -- and "proved" that the company couldn't make a profit.</p><p>Now most of the PC makers are in <a target="new" href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1006-201-1474726-0.html?pt.salon">trouble</a> or worse -- Microworkz and its iToaster are kaput, <a target="new" href="http://www.enchilada.com/">Enchilada</a> is no longer whole and free-PC pioneer Free-PC is rushing to merge with cheap-PC pioneer eMachines.</p><p>So does this mean that the makers of free and super-cheap PCs just didn't do their math? Did their executives wake up one day and think, "Boy, this was a bad idea! Why didn't we just sell computers for $600 like everybody else?"</p><p>I'll bet they didn't.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/03/free_pc_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/03/free_pc_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex sells, doesn&#039;t it?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/01/ieg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/01/ieg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/1999/12/01/ieg</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tales of financial chaos at the heart of an online porn empire.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>C</b>onventional wisdom says there is no business quite as foolproof as selling X-rated photos and their multimedia derivatives on the Web. For several years the media overplayed a public fascination with online pornography, with pundits fretting that the only thing people were using the then-nascent Net for was smut.  Having a dismally low opinion of our fellow citizens, we assumed that the demand for porn, the more hardcore the better, must be nearly insatiable.</p><p>And yet, while we assume that the computer in the next house is filled with steamy images downloaded through the Net, there's no Bill Gates of online porn. Heck, there isn't even a Hugh Hefner of online porn. The business of selling nude photo spreads is a shadowy one. Few operators of "adult sites" -- as porn sites are called by professional pornographers -- are willing to talk about their business.</p><p>Some people involved in the adult industry are so reluctant to speak to the press that they refer calls to their lawyers before they even know what they're about. Cybernet Ventures, the developer of an age verification and payment system called Adult Check, connects reporters directly with the company's general counsel, Tim Umvereit. After he's convinced that you're not under the misimpression that  Cybernet Ventures actually operates any porn sites of its own, Umvereit will happily talk to you. But he won't say much, instead descending to good-humored but nearly comic depths of obfuscation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/01/ieg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/01/ieg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toy story</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/30/etoys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/30/etoys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/11/30/etoys</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Between "eToys" and "etoy" lies more than a letter&#039;s difference.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>P</b>oor Goliath.</p><p>The guy got hit in the head with a rock, and has anyone ever felt a trace of sympathy for him? No. The big guy looked like an idiot just getting into the ring with a pipsqueak like David. And let's face it: David had the Lord of Hosts on his side. The fight was rigged.</p><p>The story of David and Goliath comes to mind, as it often does, in looking at a domain-name fight between a big guy and a little guy. In this case, the big guy is eToys, an online toy-selling star. The little guy is a group of German pranksters who work under the name "etoy."</p><p>What exactly etoy does is, as eToys admits, "difficult to categorize." One <a target="new" href="http://www.hijack.org/">site</a> run by the group calls it "the first streetgang on the information superhighway." It has taken responsibility for one high-profile Net prank, and may be associated with a larger umbrella organization of Net artists and rabble-rousers called <a target="new" href="http://www.rtmark.com/">RTMark.</a> And, more generally, the group's members are dedicated to making fun of corporate mores. I once saw them in San Francisco, at a particularly raucous New Year's party, where they were decked out Devo-like in orange jumpsuits and selling shares of stock in their "art corporation."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/30/etoys/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/30/etoys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyberslacking epidemic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/24/cyberslacking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/24/cyberslacking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/11/24/cyberslacking</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are companies losing billions of dollars to recreational surfing and e-mail chitchat?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>his week's Newsweek <a target="new" href="http://www.newsweek.com/nw-srv/printed/us/bz/a29871-1999nov23.htm">reports</a> on the battle that American employers are waging against the dread epidemic of "cyberslacking" -- recreational surfing on the job. "Personal surfing and e-mailing can seriously strain a company's computer network," Newsweek seriously reports, citing a figure of $1 billion a year in wasted computer resources, plus "billions of dollars in lost productivity."</p><p>Boy, billions of dollars. Sounds like a heck of a problem, doesn't it? And yet hardly anyone is able to talk about it with a completely straight face. Even one spokeswoman for a company cracking down on personal e-mail use admits to Newsweek that she does some of her clothes shopping at work.</p><p>Imagine that Newsweek had run an article about companies cracking down on personal phone use. And imagine that it had been illustrated with copious statistics about how personal use of the phone at work costs employers billions of dollars in lost productivity -- plus, undoubtedly, hundreds of millions of dollars worth of wear and tear on headsets.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/24/cyberslacking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/24/cyberslacking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunspots</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/18/sunspots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/18/sunspots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/11/18/sunspots</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excerpts from a diary of a networked future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"[Sun Microsystems CEO Scott] McNealy gave several examples of the Net connected future: Light bulbs will be able to warn when they're about to expire, letting the factory automatically deliver a replacement. Vending machines will bill you automatically when you order a Coke with your cell phone. And the TV set-top box will be the nerve center of home networks that tie together dishwashers, thermostats, video cameras and everything else." <br>-- From CNet News.com, Nov. 17</i></p><p><b>Jan. 17, 2003</b></p><p>Help! The washing machine has crashed and will not give up my socks. When I try to open the door, the screen flashes "Error in scripting routine, line 18637." I see the socks spinning inside. Apparently I have put in a mismatched pair, and the machine doesn't seem to like that. I think I am not the only one who has had trouble. McNealy was on television last night, saying that we could reduce processor load by investing in clothes that we can "wash once, wear many times."</p><p><b>March 12, 2003</b></p><p>Back in the 1990s, there was a joke about Bill Gates that went like this:  Q: How many Bills does it take to change a light bulb? A: None. He'd just trademark Darkness and call it an industry standard.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/18/sunspots/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/18/sunspots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The consumer&#039;s always wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/10/consumer_reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/10/consumer_reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/1999/11/10/consumer_reviews</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why else would visitors to consumer rating sites like Deja.com rank Rolling Rock the second-best beer and Alan Keyes the top presidential candidate?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>s a child, I spent several years of afternoons happily engrossed in "Family Feud," and ever since I have had a mania for polls and surveys. Not only have I always wanted to know what other people think -- this is a basic human trait -- but I have always had a particularly urgent need to know exactly what percentage of other people are thinking it. Since "Family Feud" asked contestants to guess the results of a survey of 100 Americans, (contestants would be presented with questions like, "Name an animal likely to be found on a farm," and would score the most points for guessing the most common answers), my vision of utopia, is knowing what 100 Americans think about everything, all the time: what percentage of them like the new Fox sitcom; what percentage think Kenmore dryers chew up their clothes; and what percentage think Margaret Thatcher is still the prime minister of Great Britain.</p><p>My little fantasy of having instant access to a compendium of opinion surveys might have been preposterous before the Web, and yet in just a few months we have gotten much closer than we ever previously imagined to my peculiar vision of a plebiscite society.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/10/consumer_reviews/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/10/consumer_reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fair use&#8221; vs. foul play</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/10/copyright/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/10/copyright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/11/10/copyright</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspapers win their copyright battle against FreeRepublic.com, but does the ruling threaten their investigative reporting?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>O</b>n Monday a federal court in Los Angeles enjoined Jim Robinson, the operator of a Web site called FreeRepublic.com, from posting articles copied from the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times, the  Times <a target="new" href="http://www.latimes.com/business/19991109/t000101776.html">reported</a> on Tuesday. Robinson, a right-wing activist, had set up FreeRepublic.com as a forum for other conservatives to comment on the news. To lubricate the discussion, users of his Web site  resorted to the simple expedient of copying articles more or less wholesale from major publications and putting them on his site with a request for reader comments.</p><p>FreeRepublic.com reprints the stories with a boilerplate disclaimer that<br />
the works are copyrighted and used under the "fair use" provisions of<br />
copyright law.</p><p>Judge Margaret Morrow clearly disagreed with Robinson's contention, and no wonder. There is no "fair use" provision in copyright law that lets you reprint entire articles, no matter how much discussion they are intended to spur. As a writer, I was all set to cheer the decision: The notion that somebody could take my words and simply redistribute them on the Web without my permission or my publishers' was not one that I found appealing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/10/copyright/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/10/copyright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do the paranoid survive?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/06/jackson_findings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/06/jackson_findings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 1999 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/1999/11/06/jackson_findings</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judge Jackson&#039;s opus on the browser wars portrays a Microsoft terrified by middleware.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he list of companies whose abuse by Microsoft is chronicled by U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's <a href="/tech/feature/1999/11/06/microsoft_facts/index.html">findings of fact</a> in the government's antitrust case includes most of the big names in the U.S. computer industry. In the main, however, Jackson's <a target="new" href="http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f3800/msjudgex.htm">opus</a> is a comprehensive history of Microsoft's efforts to destroy Netscape, the one software company that Bill Gates and his lieutenants saw as a serious threat to Microsoft's dominance of the personal computer world.</p><p>Page after page of the document covers in detail the "how" of Microsoft's campaign. Jackson recounts how Microsoft, aiming to make Netscape's Navigator "a jolting experience," essentially sabotaged Netscape software by building incompatibilities into Windows; how Microsoft baited and then threatened computer manufacturers to steer clear of Netscape with promises of cash and threats of cutting off access to Windows; how Microsoft "integrated" its browser with the operating system to make Netscape irrelevant. Reading his account, it is clear that the tortured locutions, bizarre demonstrations and striking lapses of memory that Microsoft executives resorted to through much of the trial availed the defense little.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/06/jackson_findings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/06/jackson_findings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boo to Boo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/05/boo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/05/boo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/11/05/boo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A much-anticipated site devoted to hipster fashion launches -- complete with some off-putting boo-boos.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>E</b>arlier this week, after months of postering cities across the Western world and splashing its ads in magazines, perhaps the most anticipated monosyllabically named Web site of all time launched its sportswear site.</p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.boo.com/">Boo</a> isn't exactly a store -- it's more like the Web's first immersive retail environment, a kind of playpen where the credit-card wielding teenagers and childlike adults who seem to be Boo.com's target customers can navigate through a carnival of brand names.</p><p>The model is not other Web stores. If anything it's REI, the Seattle sports emporium that famously has an indoor climbing wall, or Disney's chain of whirly-gig happy  <a target="new" href="http://www.forbes.com/forbes/99/0322/6306053a.htm">Discovery Channel stores.</a> This kind of commerce isn't about spending money, it's about having fun. No, scratch that. Boo.com is not just about entertainment. It's about hip, branded entertainment.</p><p>I knew before I logged on to Boo.com that actually buying something could be <a target="new" href="http://www.thestandard.com/articles/display/0,1449,7391,00.html">an ordeal.</a> But that was OK with me. I didn't come to buy, I came to shop. My mission: to have hip branded fun. Unfortunately, I think I failed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/05/boo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/05/boo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best of all possible worlds</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/04/new_optimism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/04/new_optimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/books/1999/11/04/new_optimism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dow at 36,000! No more cancer! The new techno-optimists gush about a picture-perfect future. Should we believe them?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>here's a story about Robespierre that has the preeminent rabble-rouser of<br />
the French Revolution leaping up from his chair as soon as he saw a mob<br />
assembling outside.</p><p>"I must see which way the crowd is headed," Robespierre is reputed to have<br />
said: "For I am their leader."</p><p>The story about Robespierre is certainly apocryphal, but it helps in understanding the recent proliferation of books that herald the coming of a new and unprecedented age of prosperity. The Cold War is over, unemployment is low, inflation is lower, the stock market is booming.  It's never been easier to see which way popular opinion is headed.</p><p>The new manuals of prosperity are the 1990s answer to the dark books of the 1970s and '80s that predicted a permanent oil crisis, the fragmentation of the United States, worldwide starvation and nuclear catastrophe. Just as the pop futurists of that era thought rising oil prices and double-digit inflation were the trumpets announcing the coming of the apocalypse, today's crop of professional and semi-professional seers imagine that the rising stock market is an escalator to the pearly gates of Heaven. So they rush to sing the praises of the new economic order, apparently convinced, like Robespierre, that if they just jump in soon enough they are likely to get credit for leading the parade.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/04/new_optimism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/04/new_optimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hail your e-mail</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/03/yahoo_cabs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/03/yahoo_cabs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/11/03/yahoo_cabs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the Yahoo taxis, with their free Net access, become the vehicles of the future?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b> month ago, Yahoo signed a deal with a San Francisco taxi company to put computers and wireless modems in cabs. Until today, I thought that Net access in cabs was the last thing I needed. But this morning I called a cab and happened to get one of the new Yahoo taxis -- and I couldn't get the Internet access to work.</p><p>There are only 10 Internet-ready taxicabs cruising the San Francisco streets, but it seems like there are more because you can see them from halfway across town. They are painted a bright purple with "Yahoo" written across the side in 2-foot yellow letters.</p><p>Inside, the front of the cab was a mass of wiring. There was a cable plugged into the cigarette lighter, a multi-outlet cord plugged into the cable, a computer plugged into the cord and a Ricochet wireless modem plugged into a computer. The arrangement does not look sleek, but it does look promising. With so many cables, you rather expect the thing to work.</p><p>"Does this have Net access?" I asked the driver.</p><p>It did, he said, but he wasn't sure if it worked. I picked up the computer anyway. If you happen to be a computer junkie, as I am, you'll want to know that it's a tiny NEC Mobile Pro unit running Windows CE -- something of a rarity in itself. I pressed a couple of buttons. They made amplified clicks as the screen lit up. The computer warned me that it was low on batteries.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/03/yahoo_cabs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/03/yahoo_cabs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft and Dow Jones &#8212; no love lost</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/28/microsoft_dow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/28/microsoft_dow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 1999 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/10/28/microsoft_dow</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft demands a retraction from Dow Jones, even as it joins the Dow Jones industrial average.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n just a few days, Dow Jones will add  Microsoft to the prestigious list of 30 key companies that make up the Dow Jones industrial average  -- but behind the scenes, relations between Dow Jones and Microsoft are as strained as can be.</p><p>Last Wednesday, the Dow Jones Newswire ran a story asserting that Microsoft lawyers had been asking for language in recent contracts that would allow the contracts  to remain in effect if the company were to be broken up as a result of the <a href="/tech/special/microsoft/index.html">ongoing antitrust case.</a></p><p>The story, by Dow Jones writer Mark Boslet, quoted a clause from a Microsoft contract that let it transfer the rights and obligations of the contract to "any successor to its business that results from a reorganization required by court order."</p><p>Microsoft objected to virtually every detail of the story. Moreover, Microsoft accused Dow Jones executives of leaking the contract to a Dow Jones reporter while in the middle of negotiating with Microsoft. In a letter to Dow Jones dated Oct. 22, Microsoft chief operating officer Bob Herbold said that the clause was based on a <i>draft</i> contract, that it was proposed by a Dow Jones lawyer and that Microsoft had actually rejected the language.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/28/microsoft_dow/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/28/microsoft_dow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony&#039;s $900 picture frame</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/27/memory_stick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/27/memory_stick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/1999/10/27/memory_stick</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The company&#039;s new memory cards are ultra-cool. But are they really good for anything?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n Sony's flagship San Francisco electronics store a salesman in a pressed black suit is initiating me into the mysteries of Sony's $899 digital picture frame.</p><p>The photo frame consists of a small LCD screen surrounded by a granite-colored border, with a protective glass facing. The salesman picks it up and presses a small button cleverly concealed in its side. A control panel flips out.</p><p>He presses three or four buttons in quick succession and pulls up a number of small thumbnail images. This is how I am to select the digital photo that will appear in the frame. "Oh yes, I understand," I say, not understanding at all.</p><p>And <i>this,</i> the salesman demonstrates, is how I display a slide show of all the images. "Mmmm ..." I say knowingly. Meanwhile I'm thinking to myself, "But it's a <i>$900</i> picture frame!"</p><p>Here, in one small package, are all the sins of the big electronics companies: great technology and beautiful design combined with scant attention to usability or practicality.</p><p>Sony's CyberFrame, introduced earlier this year, is one of a range of products intended to showcase the company's new <a target="new" href="http://www.world.sony.com/Electronics/MS/index.html">Memory Stick technology.</a> The others include a line of digital cameras and, coming in January, the "Memory Stick Walkman" -- a $400 digital music player that will be able to play MP3 files.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/27/memory_stick/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/27/memory_stick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The information Laundromat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/26/whisper_numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/26/whisper_numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/1999/10/26/whisper_numbers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whispernumber.com is beating the best minds of Wall Street -- but nobody really knows how.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>magine getting a hot stock tip in a conversation with a friend. The friend tells you that the tip comes from a number of "inside sources." At least he thinks so. But he's not really sure because he himself gets his tips in the mail, in unmarked envelopes. He doesn't know who his sources are, where their information comes from or why they're distributing the hot tips. Many of his informants don't even agree with each other. But he's used these tips before, and often they've worked. He's not really sure why.</p><p>Do you trust the tip?</p><p>I found out about <a target="new" href="http://www.whispernumber.com">Whispernumber.com</a> from a <a target="new" href="http://cbs.marketwatch.com/archive/19991020/news/current/ibm.htx?source=blq/yhoo">story</a> on the financial news site CBS Marketwatch. Last week, IBM reported its earnings, and they came in a little above what analysts had forecast, 93 cents a share instead of 90. Marketwatch duly reported that IBM had beaten the analysts' projections, but more intriguing was the report that it had also beaten the "whisper number" of 91 cents a share -- a number that Marketwatch attributed to Whispernumber.com.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/26/whisper_numbers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/26/whisper_numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adventures in Silicon Valley</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/22/new_new_thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/22/new_new_thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/books/1999/10/22/new_new_thing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hilarious and incisive, Michael Lewis' "The New New Thing" captures the elusive spirit of Silicon Valley.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>t's a testament to Michael Lewis' achievement as a chronicler of Wall Street that no matter how much and how incisively he writes, the single phrase that will always follow him will undoubtedly be <i>Big Swinging Dick.</i> Anyone who has read his first book, "Liar's Poker," will recall Lewis' appellation for the cowboys who pulled in the big bucks on the Street in the junk bond-besotted '80s.</p><p>In his preface to "The New New Thing," his new book about Silicon Valley, Lewis calls his tale "an old-fashioned adventure story." He's right, of course (why shouldn't he be? It's his book), but there's more to it than that. "The New New Thing" is an old-fashioned adventure story with the old-fashioned arc of a Bildungsroman -- a biographical novel. The biography is of Jim Clark, a onetime professor of computer science who came to Silicon Valley, started three companies -- Silicon Graphics, Netscape and Healtheon -- and became a billionaire. A simpler way of putting it, though, is that "The New New Thing" is the story of how Jim Clark became Silicon Valley's Biggest Swinging Dick.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/22/new_new_thing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/22/new_new_thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

