<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mark Hertsgaard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/mark_hertsgaard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When Romney helped Perry evade the law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/when_mitt_romney_helped_rick_perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/when_mitt_romney_helped_rick_perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10102497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawsuit reveals contradictory stories about an illicit $1 million campaign contribution from “Swift Boat” funder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Follow the money" is an elementary rule for understanding American politics, and in the case of Texas Gov. Rick Perry, the money trail leads to a case of apparent money laundering that involves his Republican presidential rival Mitt Romney and a $1 million contribution from the same Texas tycoon who bankrolled the "Swift Boat" attacks against the 2004 Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. John Kerry.</p><p>Bobby Jack "Bob" Perry, a residential construction magnate in Houston, is not related to Rick Perry by blood, only money. But there has been lots of that. As with the Swift Boaters to whom he donated $4.45 million, Bob Perry ranks as the single largest donor to Rick Perry during the latter's 10 years as governor of Texas, according to official figures tabulated and analyzed by Texans for Public Justice, a nonprofit watchdog group in the state capital of Austin.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/when_mitt_romney_helped_rick_perry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/when_mitt_romney_helped_rick_perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Republican candidate&#039;s hellfire</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/rick_perry_texas_is_burning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/rick_perry_texas_is_burning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global warming-denying governor and presidential candidate Rick Perry can't escape a major reckoning at home]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Bush Park burst into flames on Sept. 13, one month to the day after Texas Gov. Rick Perry announced his candidacy for president of the United States. In a summer of fierce wildfires across Texas, the George Bush Park blaze was the first big fire to erupt inside the city limits of a major metropolis -- in this case, Houston, the nation's fourth largest city and the headquarters of the oil and gas industry, a major contributor to the man-made global warming that Gov. Perry famously insists does not exist.</p><p>The national media overlooked the George Bush Park fire, just as they ignored the link between climate change and the hellish summer Texas experienced, but the fire was big news in Houston. Local TV stations <a href="http://www.click2houston.com/news/29173094/detail.html/]">showed trees burning like torches</a>, unleashing orange flames and black smoke.No evacuations were ordered, but guests at nearby hotels were spooked. "The hallways in the hotel here, you can hardly breathe," said hotel guest Shawn Porter. "It's in all the rooms. They're getting filled with smoke."&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/rick_perry_texas_is_burning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/rick_perry_texas_is_burning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walking away</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/11/silence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/11/silence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/05/11/silence</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For 22 years, John Francis walked everywhere he went to protest environmental destruction. For 17 of those years, he was silent. Today he rides in cars and speaks -- but he's still fighting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long could you survive without your car? For the many Americans who think nothing of driving 10 blocks to buy a gallon of milk, the answer is obvious. But before any of you dedicated pedestrians and die-hard cyclists start feeling smug, try this question: How long could you survive without <i>talking?</i> </p><p>Chances are, nowhere near as long as John Francis did. After a massive oil spill polluted San Francisco Bay in 1972, Francis gave up all motorized transportation. For 22 years, he walked everywhere he went -- including treks across the entire United States and much of South America -- hoping to inspire others to drop out of the petroleum economy. </p><p>Soon after he stopped riding in cars, Francis, the son of working-class African-American parents in Philadelphia, also stopped speaking. For 17 years, he communicated only through improvised sign language, notes and his ever-present banjo. The environmental pilgrim says he took his vow of silence as a gift to his community "because, man, I just argued all the time." But it may have been Francis who benefited most of all. For the first time, he found he was able to truly listen to other people and the larger world around him, transforming his approach to both personal communication and environmental activism. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/11/silence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/11/silence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Dean should take charge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/24/dean_45/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/24/dean_45/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Dean]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/01/24/dean</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With his passion and populist appeal, Howard Dean is exactly the leader the Democratic Party needs right now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florida Democrats' decision to unanimously back Howard Dean as the new chairman of the DNC (Democratic National Committee) shows two things: first, there are still some Democrats out there -- including in the supposedly hopeless South -- who have brains and guts and aren't afraid to think for themselves; and second, Dean now has a real shot at winning the DNC job and launching a much-needed makeover of the Democratic Party. </p><p>Political and media elites in Washington are at once horrified and dismissive of Dean's quest. They insist that Democrats would be crazy to pick a raving liberal like Dean as their next party chairman. But as is so often the case, this inside-the-Beltway conventional wisdom is based on dubious "facts" and assumptions about how ordinary Americans relate to politics. Dean is exactly the leader Democrats need to become relevant again. </p><p>The Florida Democratic chairman's statement to the New York Times reveals just how out of touch the Washington establishment is: "I'm a gun-owning pickup-truck driver and I have a bulldog named Lockjaw," said Scott Maddox. "I am a Southern chairman of a Southern state, and I am perfectly comfortable with Howard Dean as DNC chair." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/01/24/dean_45/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/24/dean_45/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice for Bhopal survivors</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/02/bhopal_20th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/02/bhopal_20th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/12/02/bhopal_20th</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The worst industrial disaster in history killed 22,000 people and counting. Twenty years later, activists are working with Amnesty International to haul those responsible into court.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the night her world changed forever, Rashida Bee was 28 years old and had already been married for more than half her life. Her parents, traditional Muslims, had selected her husband for her when she was 13. He worked as a tailor, and they lived together in her parents' modest home in the industrial city of Bhopal, in central India. Bee hadn't learned to read or write, and she ventured out of the house only when escorted by a male relative. It was nevertheless a full life; her extended family of siblings, nieces and nephews numbered 37 in all. </p><p>The fateful night came on a Sunday. Bee and her family had gone to bed after sharing a simple supper. But shortly after midnight, in the early hours of Dec. 3, 1984, Bee was awakened by the sound of violent coughing. It was coming from the children's room. "They said they felt like they were being choked," Bee later told the online environmental magazine Grist, "and we [adults] felt that way too. One of the children opened the door and a cloud came inside. We all started coughing violently, as if our lungs were on fire." </p><p>From out on the street came the sound of shouting. In the light of a street lamp, Bee saw crowds of shadowy figures running past the house. "Run," they yelled. "A warehouse of red chilies is on fire. Run!" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/02/bhopal_20th/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/02/bhopal_20th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World to Americans: You&#8217;re OK &#8212; it&#8217;s Bush we hate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/10/22/world_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/10/22/world_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2004/10/22/world</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But if we reelect the least popular man on the planet, we could find ourselves being despised, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foreigners say over and over that it's George W. Bush they dislike, not all Americans. But what if Americans give Mr. Bush a second term as president on Nov. 2? Will foreigners still say it's the man in the White House who is the problem, not the voters who put him there? </p><p>The U.S. presidential election is widely seen as too close to call, but one thing is clear: If the rest of the world could vote, Bush would lose in a landslide. </p><p>The most recent evidence came last week, when major newspapers in 10 countries released the results of a series of coordinated opinion polls. Thousands of people in Japan, Great Britain, Israel, Mexico, Spain, Russia, South Korea, France, Canada and Australia were asked their views about Bush, challenger John Kerry, the war in Iraq and the global role of the United States. By a 2-to-1 margin, foreigners opposed a second term for Bush. Only in two terror-traumatized countries, Israel and Russia, did a majority of respondents favor Bush over Kerry. </p><p>Most foreign governments seem to share their citizens' desire for Bush's defeat, even if diplomatic constraints keep them from saying so publicly. "Even off the record, government officials will not tell you this," a spokesman for a major European nation told me in June, "and I am not telling you this now." But his mischievous smile left little doubt about his true feelings. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/10/22/world_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/10/22/world_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kucinich: Voters need &#8220;a second opinion&#8221; on Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/19/kucinich_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/19/kucinich_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/12/18/kucinich</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview with Link TV and Salon, the Ohio congressman slams the Vermont doctor on national healthcare, and says Bush is a bad president but shouldn't be impeached.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> When ABC's Ted Koppel suggested to Democratic Rep. Dennis Kucinich during last week's presidential debate that his low poll numbers and relatively meager campaign coffers made him a "vanity" candidate who should perhaps leave the race, it gave the four-term Ohio congressman a chance to answer a question that he probably knows others are asking, if only in whispers. </p><p> "I want the American people to see where the media take politics in this country," Kucinich responded. "We start talking about endorsements, now we're talking about polls, and then we're talking about money. Well, you know, when you do that, you don't have to talk about what's important to the American people." The studio audience roared applause as Kucinich added, "I'm the only one up here on the stage that actually voted against the PATRIOT Act and voted against the [Iraq] war -- the only one on this stage." Whatever his critics believe, it's clear Kucinich doesn't think his is a vanity campaign. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/12/19/kucinich_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/19/kucinich_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Bush could save his presidency &#8212; and why he won&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/15/apologize/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/15/apologize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2003/10/15/apologize</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president needs to apologize for Iraq -- but he's constitutionally incapable of admitting he was wrong.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lesson of every presidential scandal in modern American history is that it's the coverup, not the crime, that kills you. Nixon and Watergate, Reagan and Iran-contra, Clinton and Monica Lewinsky -- each president might have avoided disgrace if only he had promptly admitted his misdeeds so the country could forgive him and move on. Instead, each man dragged his drama out by telling lies that invited first disbelief, then ridicule, and eventually demands for censure. </p><p>George W. Bush is now on the verge of making the same mistake. Like Clinton, Reagan and Nixon before him, Bush's problem is that he has lied to the American people, and the question hanging over the future of his presidency is whether he will have to fess up. </p><p>Clinton and Reagan did. Reagan salvaged his presidency by giving a nationally televised Oval Office speech admitting that "my heart still tells me we didn't trade arms for hostages, but the facts show otherwise." Clinton avoided removal from office by confessing during a prime-time television speech to an "inappropriate" relationship with Lewinsky (Clinton's apology was so lame and late, however, that he still had to endure the humiliation of impeachment). Consummate politicians, both Reagan and Clinton chose to endure the temporary shame of apology in order to keep their job as the most powerful man on earth. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/10/15/apologize/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/15/apologize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conflict of interest for Christine Todd Whitman?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/15/whitman_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/15/whitman_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2002 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/01/14/whitman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EPA's ombudsman says Whitman muzzled him for criticizing a sweetheart Superfund settlement with a big investor in her husband's firm.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ombudsman for the Environmental Protection Agency says he was punished by administrator Christine Todd Whitman after he opposed an agreement to sharply limit the amount of money financial titan Citigroup -- a principal investor in Whitman's husband's venture capital firm -- would have to pay in a controversial Superfund cleanup case. </p><p> EPA ombudsman Robert J. Martin, who functions as the agency's public interest advocate, alleges that Whitman ordered his office reassigned within the EPA bureaucracy and stripped of its independence after he opposed a nuclear-waste cleanup settlement with Citigroup that would limit its liability to a fraction of the cleanup cost. </p><p> Martin made the conflict of interest charge against Whitman in a lawsuit filed Jan. 10 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The suit sought a temporary restraining order to prevent the ombudsman's duties and investigative files from being transferred to the EPA's Office of Inspector General, an agency Martin has clashed with in the past and is currently investigating. Through a spokesperson, Whitman denied Martin's charges. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/01/15/whitman_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/15/whitman_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mikhail Gorbachev explains what&#8217;s rotten in Russia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/07/gorbachev/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/07/gorbachev/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2000 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/09/07/gorbachev</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a rare interview, the former Soviet leader says glasnost is working, but globalization isn't.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikhail Gorbachev has a new mission: saving the world's environment. In an interview at the State of the World Forum in New York Tuesday, the former leader of the Soviet Union said, "I think the environmental problem will be the number one item on the agenda of the 21st century ... This is a problem that cannot be postponed." </p><p>Gorbachev linked the planet's worsening health to globalization and the growing gap between rich and poor it has produced. But he emphasized, "We cannot just criticize, cannot just blame. We should try to understand what is happening and what we need to do." </p><p>The former Soviet leader also spoke at length about Russian President Vladimir Putin, rebutting criticisms that Putin is returning Russia to authoritarianism and crippling the nation's environmental regulations. After the two men met this summer, at Putin's invitation, Gorbachev had praised Putin for restoring "order" in Russia. </p><p>In Tuesday's interview with Salon and National Public Radio's "Living on Earth," Gorbachev stood by his comment, asserting that Putin is "in favor of laws and courts being effective, because in the chaos that existed in Russia under Yeltsin ... dishonest people ... appropriated a lot of property." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/07/gorbachev/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/07/gorbachev/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California could end clear-cutting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/23/clear_cutting_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/23/clear_cutting_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/08/23/clear_cutting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bill to make the practice illegal puts politicians in the hot spot between the timber industry and the increasingly tree-friendly public.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a major environmental development, California may soon ban clear-cutting in the state's forests. Legislation mandating a temporary ban passed a crucial hurdle Tuesday when the state Senate Natural Resources and Wildlife Commitee voted 5-4 to approve the bill. Meanwhile, California's biggest logger, Sierra Pacific Industries, has responded to public outcry against clear-cutting by announcing its own 30-day suspension on some operations. </p><p>As Salon <a href="/news/feature/2000/06/09/clear_cutting">reported</a> June 9, Sierra Pacific has faced especially fierce local criticism of an 884-acre clear-cutting project on the border of Big Trees State Park, where giant sequoia redwood trees were first discovered in the 1850s. Activists have also opposed clear-cutting farther north in the Sierra Nevada, in Yuba Valley and at the Headwaters Reserve on the North Coast, where Judge Quentin Koop ordered Pacific Lumber Company to suspend logging. Koop criticized Pacific Lumber for making misleading statements to government regulators. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/23/clear_cutting_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/23/clear_cutting_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The California chainsaw massacre</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/09/clear_cutting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/09/clear_cutting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/06/09/clear_cutting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clear-cutting is tearing up forests in the nation's most environmentally aware state, and opponents blame the timber industry's ties to Gov. Gray Davis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest trees on Earth are just a three-hour drive east of San Francisco, in California's Sierra Nevada mountains. Giant sequoia redwoods are in fact the biggest living things on the planet, and very nearly the oldest as well. Lifespans of 2,000 years are common; the most ancient specimen is 3,300 years old. </p><p>Giant sequoias made news last month when President Clinton named part of the Sequoia National Forest a national monument. The sequoias' cousins, the slightly smaller coastal redwoods, recently got attention too, thanks to the intrepid tree-sitter <a href="/people/feature/2000/06/01/butterflyhill/index.html">Julia Butterfly Hill.</a> Now, Big Trees State Park, where California settlers first discovered giant sequoias in 1852, is threatened by clear-cutting on its borders. </p><p>Clear-cutting is a logging practice that involves felling every tree on a given plot of land, scraping the land bare, spraying it with herbicides and replanting it as a tree plantation. Timber industry officials say that clear-cutting makes for healthier, more productive forests. Most environmentalists counter that the higher production comes at great cost to wildlife, habitat and the water supplies humans and animals depend upon. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/09/clear_cutting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/09/clear_cutting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bought and paid for</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/gore_cpi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/gore_cpi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2000/feature/2000/01/21/gore_cpi</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gore&#039;s oily family friends, Bush&#039;s profitable Harvard connections and other stories you&#039;re not likely to read about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vice President Al Gore delivered a scathing speech back on Oct. 7, 1997, at Georgetown University in Washington chiding those who "ignore the scientific warnings [about global warming] and continue stubbornly on our current course."  How will our children and grandchildren ever forgive us, Gore asked, if we do not act in the face of overwhelming evidence that burning more oil and coal is changing the earth's climate?</p><p>On that very same day, thanks to recommendations Gore made as part of his crusade to "reinvent government," the Department of Energy announced that Occidental Petroleum was buying the Elk Hills reserve in California, 47,000 acres of oil-rich, publicly owned land that had been off-limits to commercial development since 1912. President Nixon had tried to open up Elk Hills to private interests in 1973, after the first oil shock. President Reagan tried three separate times to do the same.  Each time, Congress blocked the sale.  But Al Gore, with President Clinton's help, succeeded.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/gore_cpi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/gore_cpi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Earth odyssey</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/30/pass_35/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/30/pass_35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 1999 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/travel/feature/1999/12/30/pass</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was with ambivalence that I finally made my way to the run-down international airport outside Nairobi one evening in March 1992. My plane ticket said I was taking the midnight flight to Bangkok by way of Bombay and Delhi. But to anyone living with one foot still planted in the nineteenth century &#8212; that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">I</font>t was with ambivalence that I finally made my way to the run-down   international airport outside Nairobi one evening in March 1992.  My plane   ticket said I was taking the midnight flight to Bangkok by way of Bombay   and Delhi.  But to anyone living with one foot still planted in the   nineteenth century -- that is, to most of the people I had been traveling   among the previous four months -- this journey would qualify as something   very close to magic.  I would be seated inside a long metal tube that,   despite its enormous weight, would lift off the ground, climb above the   clouds and travel thousands of miles, traversing in hours the same ocean   that ancient Arab traders used to take weeks to cross in their wind-blown   dhows.  The Air India jet that would perform this feat epitomized what   historian Eric Hobsbawm has called the "revolutionary and constantly   advancing technology ... which virtually annihilated time and distance"   during the twentieth century.  Indeed, the main reason time seemed to pass   more slowly in Africa was that technologies like the airplane and telephone   had not yet touched the daily lives of most Africans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/30/pass_35/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/30/pass_35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mushroom cloud over Denver?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/04/12/whistleblower/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/04/12/whistleblower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1999 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/04/12/security</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A top Department of Energy official is caught on tape worrying that security is lax at Rocky Flats weapons facility.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>hat if Timothy McVeigh had attacked Oklahoma City with nuclear rather than conventional explosives?  What if the World Trade Center bombers had packed their truck with plutonium rather than the chemical cocktail they used?</p><p>Now, transplant those nightmare scenarios to Denver, and put yourself in the mind of Ed McCallum.  The year is 1997.  McCallum is the Department of Energy's top professional with hands-on responsibility for protecting the nation's vast stores of nuclear weapons-grade materials from theft or sabotage. McCallum has been reviewing the security performance at Rocky Flats, the nuclear site 17 miles northwest of Denver, and he sees the catastrophe of the century waiting to happen, on his watch.</p><p>"The workers at that plant, and the citizens of Colorado, are at extremely high risk" of a terrorist assault that could unleash "a little mushroom-shaped cloud" over Denver, McCallum confided in a phone call to a colleague that May. Such a blast would not only kill Denver's million-plus inhabitants, it would claim tens of millions of additional lives as its radioactive plume blew across the Midwest and on to the East Coast.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/04/12/whistleblower/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/04/12/whistleblower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fear of fluoride</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/02/17/news_181/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/02/17/news_181/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1999 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/02/17/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Questions about the safety of this cavity-fighting chemical aren&#039;t just for right-wing conspiracists anymore.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">H</font>ave you read the fine print on your toothpaste tube recently? Check it out. If your toothpaste contains fluoride -- which nearly every brand in the United States does -- there's a consumer advisory message that might surprise and alarm you, especially if you're the parent of young children.</p><p>The advisory, which began appearing on fluoridated toothpaste in April 1997, by order of the Food and Drug Administration, begins with the familiar command to brush thoroughly at least twice a day. But then it includes special instructions for children ages two to six: "Use only a pea sized amount and supervise child's brushing and rinsing (to minimize swallowing)." Then comes an additional warning to keep the toothpaste "out of the reach of children under 6 years of age," and finally the ominous advice, "In case of accidental ingestion ... contact a Poison Control Center immediately."</p><p>What's going on here? Isn't toothpaste supposed to be good for us? Haven't we been told for decades -- by the government, by the American Dental Association, by countless Crest and Colgate television commercials -- that fluoride is essential to fighting cavities? Isn't that why nearly two-thirds of the public water supplies in the United States are fluoridated?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/02/17/news_181/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/02/17/news_181/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meanwhile, back on Capitol Hill &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1998/10/07/news_125/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1998/10/07/news_125/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 1998 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1998/10/07/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using the impeachment drama as a diversionary tactic, anti-environmental forces attach a series of dangerous "riders" to last-minute funding bills.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">W</font>ho says the Lewinsky scandal has paralyzed Washington? The media's nonstop scandal coverage may give the impression that Congress is doing nothing but preparing to hold impeachment hearings. But don't believe it. Behind the scenes, it's business as usual here in the nation's capital -- which is to say that lawmakers of both parties are busy trying to sneak into law dozens of special favors for the special interests who shower them with campaign contributions.</p><p>Some of the most disturbing giveaways concern the environment and public health, issues with such middle-of-the-road electoral appeal that even the scandal-weakened White House has pledged to block the maneuvering. Since most of the favors are attached to spending bills that must pass by this Friday, Oct. 9, in order to keep the government running, the result may be a repeat of the Clinton-Congress stand-off that produced the government shutdown of 1995.</p><p>"It's a very clever technique, trying to divert the nation with the bimbo business while they're busy doing the polluters' business," says Philip Clapp, president of National Environmental Trust, a Washington advocacy group. "There's three times as many anti-environmental amendments being pushed this year as in 1995, but the difference is that in 1995 the media was covering the issue, so Republicans backed off for fear of a voter backlash."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1998/10/07/news_125/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1998/10/07/news_125/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsreal: Still in the balance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1997/12/12/news_161/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1997/12/12/news_161/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1997/12/12/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kyoto treaty to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be &#039;historic,&#039; and may even pay political dividends for America&#039;s chief negotiator, Al Gore. But the loophole-studded agreement may not be nearly enough to rescue the planet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font color="#000000"><b>"A</b></font> historic landmark in environmental protection."</p><p>That's what Philip E. Clapp, the president of the National Environmental  Trust, called the global warming treaty signed in Kyoto Thursday. His comment is particularly notable since Clapp, one of the most  influential environmentalists in Washington, has for months been fiercely  accusing the White House of betraying its green rhetoric. He even helped dream  up the recent advertisements in New Hampshire showing Vice President Al Gore's  book, "Earth In the Balance," with the taunt stamped across the cover,  "Withdrawn by Author?"</p><p>But let's grant that the treaty obligating the  United States and other industrialized nations to reduce their  greenhouse gas emissions overall by approximately 5 percent by 2012 is indeed historic. The  question is, what kind of history will the treaty make? Will our children look back on it as the  beginning of a successful international effort to avoid a world of  killer droughts, rising sea levels and mass species extinctions? Or will they  condemn it as too little, too late -- a collection of well-meaning but  loophole-ridden pledges whose inadequacies were papered over by  self-congratulatory statements from politicians like Gore and President Clinton, both of  whom will be out of office before the treaty's commitments come due?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1997/12/12/news_161/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1997/12/12/news_161/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gospel according to Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1997/11/12/cov_12mccartney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1997/11/12/cov_12mccartney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 1997 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/1997/11/12/cov_12mccartney</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His authorized biography makes a convincing case that Paul McCartney, derided as a pretty-boy lightweight, stood equal with John Lennon in creating some of the most
important and beloved music of the 20th century.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1" color="#000000">I'm</font>    just like everybody else, John Lennon once confessed. I fell for Paul because of his looks, then George came along and knew how to play lead guitar, and Ringo was Ringo, so we all ended up together.</p><p>Of course, there was a bit more to the founding of the Beatles than that, especially as regards Paul McCartney. From the afternoon in June 1957 when Lennon and McCartney first met as Liverpool teenagers, Paul -- who could actually tune a guitar and remember all the words of songs -- was always John's musical equal and then some. As the years went by, their friendship deepened and their songwriting partnership blossomed to produce some of the most important and beloved music of the 20th century. They loved and fought with each other like brothers, but remained soul mates to the very end, as even Yoko Ono, Paul's replacement at the center of John's world, recognized. In the nightmarish hours immediately after Lennon's murder in 1980, Ono made but two phone calls: one to John's Aunt Mimi, the woman who had raised him, and one to Paul, the partner who, despite their many public and private spats, was still closer to John than blood.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1997/11/12/cov_12mccartney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1997/11/12/cov_12mccartney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsreal: The real China threat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1997/10/29/news_441/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1997/10/29/news_441/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 1997 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1997/10/29/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world&#039;s most populous country could single-handedly wreck the global environment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1" color="#000000">human</font> rights, trade deals, secret campaign contributions and, most recently, stock market crashes -- these are the issues that come to mind when Americans think of China. But so far we have overlooked what may be the real China problem: the environmental catastrophe rapidly unfolding there.</p><p>China's environmental disaster threatens not only the Chinese people -- who are dying in the hundreds of thousands every year from staggering levels of air and water pollution -- but all humanity. With its gigantic population and booming economy, China can single-handedly guarantee that climate change, ozone depletion and other deadly hazards become a reality for people the world over.</p><p>In the back of our minds, Americans may suspect that China is an environmental wasteland -- after all, we know what happened in the Soviet Union. But the truth has yet to be revealed in all its ghastly vividness, not least because of China's restrictions on foreign journalists. I recently spent six weeks traveling unmonitored throughout China, interviewing everyone from senior government officials and scientific experts to unpaid workers and newly prosperous peasants. Everywhere, it seemed, the land had been scalped, the water poisoned, the air made toxic and dark.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1997/10/29/news_441/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1997/10/29/news_441/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
