Mary Roach

Lip balm anonymous

When you put it on in your sleep, you have a problem.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Here are some of the scary things you will learn at the Lip Balm Anonymous Web site. Addict Emma S. was observed by her college roommate putting lip balm on in her sleep. Lisa M. uses lip balm an average of 108 times a day. Rachel F. keeps a tube of lip balm in the pocket of her bathrobe in case she needs a fix in the shower. Cindy R. resorted to rubbing creme rinse into her lips after finding she’d left her lip balm in her checked luggage.

Equally scary is the fact that these women failed to see that Lip Balm Anonymous is a joke, a tongue-in-cheek takeoff on Alcoholics Anonymous and its countless 12-step addiction spinoffs. It exists only on the Internet. There are no LBA meetings, no books, no bumper stickers. The self-test is basically AA’s with “lip balm” substituted for “alcohol,” and “coating” for “drinking.” (“Do you occasionally coat heavily after a disappointment,
quarrel or rough day?” ) Nonetheless, 75 percent of the estimated 30,000 testimonies founder Kevin C. received last year were serious.

Clearly the LBA site has touched a nerve. What the site doesn’t do is answer the million-dollar question: Are lip balms addictive? Is there some biological reason why using a lip balm makes you need to keep using it? Kevin C. believes the answer is yes. Having spent years never leaving home without my Vaseline, I can almost believe it.

Kevin C. — by day a mild-mannered information specialist in Mountain View, Calif. — has referred me to Charles Zugerman, an associate professor of dermatology at Northwestern University in Chicago. Zugerman is a consultant to the lip balm industry. While admittedly this may impart a certain bias, it also makes him one of the few medically qualified individuals with lip balm experience. I have presented Zugerman with one of the
theories put forth on the LBA site, one that seemed to make good sense: “The wax in lip balms causes the moisture receptors in your lips to send a stop signal to the moisture-releasing agents in the skin of the lips.” In other words, since you’re giving the lips an outside source of lubricant, they stop making their own.

“There are no ‘moisture receptors’ in the lips,” says Zugerman flatly. Nor, he goes on to say, do the lips have moisture-releasing agents. “Lips don’t have sebaceous glands.” He senses my dismay. “Other than that, it’s a good theory.”

Another theory is that there’s some ingredient that’s drying out the lips, creating the need for ever more goo. Recovering balm-aholic Lisa “I’m very proud to say I’m able to go for six to eight hours without using” M. thinks it’s the alcohol. Zugerman points out that most cosmetics and toiletries have some chemical formulation of alcohol or another, but that it’s typically not the drying kind (ethyl alcohol). Often it’s steryl alcohol, an emulsifier added to keep the ingredients from separating.

Kevin C.’s theory is that it’s camphor and menthol, a duo that appears in Blistex, Carmex and other “medicated” lip balms. The two are known in the industry as “counter irritants.” It’s cure by distraction: Menthol and camphor create a cooling, tingling sensation that takes your mind off the burning and stinging of chapped lips. No one I spoke to — not the FDA, not Zugerman, not Howard Maibach, author of the
Textbook of Cosmetic Dermatology — knew of any data to suggest that either substance was drying. Ditto phenol, a mild anesthetic that often turns up in lip balm ingredient lists.

Which leaves us at exfoliants. Some balms have started adding alpha hydroxy acids, which burn off the dry, dead outer layer of the chapped lip. As with AHAs in facial moisturizers, however, the companies insist that the amounts are so small they shouldn’t cause drying. The original lip exfoliant is salicylic acid, found in Carmex. Carmex is the name that comes up most often in discussions of lip balm addictions. There was once an
entire section devoted to Carmex Addiction in the alt.folklore.urban newsgroup on Usenet.

Carmex was originally designed for cold sores. It speeds their disappearance by burning off the layers of dead skin on the healing blemish. It stands to reason that using it on healthy lips — which 80 percent of Carmex buyers do — might expose soft new lip skin to the elements before it’s ready and thereby lead to chapping.

Carmex president Paul Woelbing is not surprised to learn that my call has to do with the purported addictive nature of his product. At last count, he’s sent out 150 letters to people assuring them his product is not addictive. “We get letters from people who’ve heard it contains nicotine or that there’s bits of fiberglass in it or acid that roughs up your lips and makes you keep using it.”

“What about that last one?” I outline the salicylic-acid-on-healthy-lips theory.

“It’s a tiny amount,” he says. “Not even 1 percent.”

“So why put it in if it doesn’t do anything?”

Woelbing tells me what he told the 150 people who wrote to him: “If you’re having trouble, we suggest trying a more neutral product, like Vaseline.”

Woelbing admits to using eight or 10 times a day.

“Answer me honestly, Paul.” I have in front of me the LBA self-test. “Is your lip balm use causing conflict with your spouse or family? Do you feel depressed, guilty or remorseful after you use lip balm?”

“I can stop any time I want to.”

Carmex aside, why does Rene D. buy Avon Care Deeply in bulk, 15 tubes at a time? Why did Emma M. go out to a gas station at 4 a.m. to buy Chapstick after “suffering from not using the last three hours.” What’s behind “that gross dry feeling that drives [Tara P.] crazy until [she] can get to some lubrication”?

University of California professor of dermatology Roy Grekin suggests it may be largely a matter of climate. Rene and Emma and Tara probably live somewhere dry, and so their lips are chronically dry. Dry air pulls water from the lips. It’s simple chemistry. “Two different concentrations of water will try to equalize themselves,” Grekin explains. “Put a glass of water out in a dry area and next day it’s empty. It’s in the air. The body is like a glass of water. We’re 70 percent water.” One sure way to kick a lip balm habit:
Move someplace humid. “Soon as you step off the plane in Hawaii, I can guarantee you,” says Grekin, “you won’t need lip balm.”

Alternatively, the woe-beset women of the LBA Web site may be lip lickers. Lip-licking — yes, this is an actual dermatological phenomenon — is one of physiology’s vicious circles. Your lips feel dry so you lick them, but licking dries them out more, causing you to lick them even more. “The wet-dry-wet cycle tends to irritate the lips,” Zugerman says. “It’s like constantly washing your hands.” Lip balms help because they contain petroleum
or wax — oily materials that trap moisture inside the lips, making them temporarily less dehydrated.

In short, people overuse lip balms because they work. “When you put moisturizer on the lips, the lips feel better,” says Zugerman. “When the lips feel better, there’s a general desire to use the product more and more. When you stop using it, you’re used to the feeling of having something good on there and it doesn’t feel good anymore. The need is not physiological. It’s psychological.”

Woelbing agrees. “When people claim to be addicted to Carmex, what they are experiencing is the natural tendency to repeatedly use something which is effective and/or pleasurable,” says Woelbing. “For example, I joke that I am addicted to chocolate and the TV show ‘Frasier.’”

Why is it so hard to quit? Zugerman likens it to a hangnail you’re used to picking at. “If you try to stop cold turkey, then all you can think about is that hangnail. It’s not anything more than that.” One thing is certain. As Kevin C. says himself, “In the grand scheme of things, it really isn’t that big of a problem.”

Living forever

If we all live to be 150, where will we park?

  • more
    • All Share Services

Scientists recently managed to double the life span of the common fruit fly. Instead of
having only two weeks to hang around on rotting fruit, now they have four. Last month,
these same scientists gathered to debate the likelihood that humans would soon be able to do the same thing. (Live longer, that is. Not hang around on rotting fruit. That has always been an option.)

The answer was yes. “Future generations may be able to avail themselves
of scientifically established techniques to stretch the human life span like a piece of taffy until it reaches 150, even 200 years,” reported the New York Times. The piece went on to say that you would not look 200 years old, however that might look (I’m thinking dried fruit). You would live out your extra generations looking and feeling like a 40- or 50-year-old.

I cannot speak for fruit flies — though with all that time on their hands (wings? feet?) I expect they’ll be mastering English shortly and that sort of thing won’t be necessary — but I personally do not want my lifespan stretched like taffy. In my experience, no good comes of stretching taffy. As much taffy as you have is usually more than you want.

Likewise life. Who really wants to be around for another 150 years? Imagine it. Movies will cost $155, and most will star Adam Sandler. Seven-year-olds will be having sex. Health insurance will cost more than a mortgage, forcing people to live in their SUVs, which will by that time be larger than most single-family dwellings anyway. Economy-class airline passengers will be hung vertically on racks similar to those used by dry cleaners. The parking situation alone would be enough to keep me from signing on.

I will concede, however, that the people of the 22nd century will need some extra
time. Projections based on current figures suggest that it will take an average of 22 hours on hold to reach a customer service representative at Viacom, several weeks to cross L.A. on Route 495, and the better part of a decade to stand on line at the DMV.

And certainly there would be some pluses to living to 200; my Disney stock might finally do something, and it will be entertaining to watch bell bottoms come around for the fifth time. But by and large the idea of being alive in the year 2110 is about as appealing as saltwater taffy (current stocks of which will still be on hand in 2110).

As for stopping the aging process, pish-tush. It can’t really be done, even if you do
manage to stem the advance of physical decrepitude. For aging is more than liver spots
and cataracts. Aging is the natural and inevitable process of growing bored with almost everything, and disgusted with everything else. It begins around 35. You start to grow indifferent toward everything you once loved. Your career, your hobbies, Thai food, flirting, getting dressed up. You grow cynical. You grow jaded. Bit by bit, year by year, everything begins to seem stale and pointless. (When, in reality, it is you who is stale and pointless.)

So desperate are you for something different and meaningful that you decide to have
children. This passes the time for another 25 years. By then you’re pushing 60. You retire. You travel a bit — maybe five years, tops. (By the time you’re 70, the list of countries you actually want to visit has dwindled significantly: Canada, anything Caribbean, Ireland and any country that doesn’t put its bathrooms down the hall.)

Imagine having another 100 years. What will there be left to do? Complain. Compete with your daughters for men. Complain. Swat fruit flies (a burgeoning problem, thanks to research gone awry in the late 20th century).

The system as it stands has a certain elegance and logic. God makes you get sickly
and grotesque, so that by the time you’re on your last legs, the thought of leaving it all
behind is actually kind of appealing. You die and make room for someone new, someone
full of optimism and muscle tone and enthusiasm for today’s new music.

What would a society do with its old people if they refused to die? How would we
handle this ballooning population of healthy but deeply bored and irritable 150-year-old 50-year-olds? To be sure, there will be growth in certain industries (menopause research comes to mind), but how will we manage to employ everyone? Most of the 80-plus crowd will be forced to retire, for what company could stay in business dishing out annual pay increases to its staff for 130 years? How can cutting-edge technology companies bring in new blood if the old blood won’t go away?

So they’ll have no jobs, no income. What do we do with them? Take all the money
that would have been funneled into funeral homes and adult diapers and people hired to
drive those electric carts at airports and use it as a form of welfare? Create subsidized housing out of the thousands of cruise ships dry-docked with the advent of hale and vigorous oldsters? I don’t know. I only know I don’t want to be there.

Some would accuse me of sour grapes — that because I was born too soon to take
advantage of this Brave New World, I can only condemn it. Maybe, maybe not. But I
will say this. If the grapes are sour, you have only to leave them out in a sunny spot in
your kitchen and they will ripen, and fruit flies will appear, and when they do, you ask
them what they think about it.

Continue Reading Close

The yuckiest food in the Amazon

What tastes worse than rodent knee and saliva-flavored manioc mash? It depends where you come from, as Mary Roach learns in a remote Amazon village.

  • more
    • All Share Services

In 1986, a psychologist named Paul Rozin took a group of toddlers and did a peculiar thing. One by one, he sat them down at a table and presented them with a plate of what he said was dog-doo and asked them if they’d like to eat it. (In fact, it was peanut butter, scented with bleu cheese.) Then he did the same with a sterilized grasshopper. Sixty-two percent of the children under 2 happily dispatched the ersatz turd; 31 percent the insect. Older children invariably rejected both plates. His point: Disgust is learned. Culture is our instructor. We are taught that horse meat is disgusting but chicken embryos are not; that Slim Jims are tasty and crickets are gross.

Espousing, as I have, a belief that nothing is inherently disgusting, that it’s all a case of mind over culture, I have frequently, in my travels, felt the need to put my money where my mouth is and my mouth where it would rather not go. I have eaten walrus meat left buried on an Arctic beach to “ferment” for a month, a raw fish eye and its accompanying musculature, duck tongue, caribou marrow, brain, flipper, ant. I am, yes, one of those annoying travelers who boast about the disgusting food they’ve lived to tell about (and tell about and tell about).

Now I am getting my come-uppance. I am getting it big-time, in a small village in the Ecuadorian Amazon. I have come here to do a story on an anthropologist named John Patton. Patton studies a tribe called the Achuar, notable for their skill in blowgun-making and their long-ago rivalry with the head-shrinking Chuar. (If you’ve seen an authentic South American shrunken head, you’ve probably seen an Achuar tribesman.) Patton’s base is Conambo, a scatter of houses along a fast, muddy river, reachable every now and again by a four-seater missionary plane. There is no hotel, no restaurant, no store. You eat what they hunt.

I am fast coming to understand that there is a huge difference, a vast yawning canyon of difference, between tasting something deeply unappealing and living on it. Anyone, if he tries, can suppress his disgust long enough to swallow a single fish eye or a mouthful of decaying walrus. Eating enough of this sort of thing to live on is altogether a different matter. I am here for five days. I’m not doing very well.

My problem at the moment is a knee. It’s a rodent knee, quietly genuflecting in a bowl of oily broth. Earlier today, the knee was attached to a happy, hairy, spaniel-sized rodent, gamboling and cavorting in the wee hours of the rain forest morning until our host happened along and plugged it full of buckshot. (Blowguns are used only on birds and pack animals like monkeys, which would be scared off by gunshot.)

The knee is one of nature’s marvels, a busy intersection of tendon, bone and cartilage. Be that as it may, “marvel” does not exactly describe my state of mind at the moment. Extreme psychic discomfort comes closer. The hunter and the chef are sitting directly across from me. Their generosity is heartbreaking. I have to clean my plate. I must force apart the gristly abomination with my teeth, work my tongue into its fissures and slimy orifices, extract anything vaguely chewable, and swallow it. I lean over to scout the contents of Patton’s bowl.

He got the ankle. The thing about ankle bones, as schoolchildren everywhere know, is
that they’re attached to foot bones. And foot bones are attached to toe bones and toenails
and those filthy little rubbery pads on the bottom of the foot. No matter how good a meat
may taste, the experience is indelibly marred by the act of spitting ghastly unchewables out
into your fingers.

Patton is undaunted. He has the entire thing in his mouth. He stops sucking and
gumming long enough to say: “The foot pads are a good source of fat.” He is enjoying
his rodent soup in the way that only a man who has been served steamed tapir fetus and
live palm beetles can. A hail of tiny foot bones accumulates on the ground beside him.

The knee awaits. I’ve finished my broth. To stall any longer would betray my
revulsion. I manage to locate a couple of pockets of reasonably normal-looking flesh. My
inclination is to chew these slowly, forever if need be, until my hosts tire of sitting here
and go off to tend the manioc garden. The problem with this tactic is that boiled rodent
flesh isn’t the sort of thing you want to have hanging around your tongue for any longer
than is strictly necessary for purposes of not choking to death. It’s not really that bad, it’s
just strong. As in overpowering, as in taste buds passing out and waving white flags. It
doesn’t, in short, taste anything like chicken. I find myself chewing with my mouth open,
hoping my hosts will take this for an endearing cultural peculiarity, rather than an attempt
to bypass the tasting portion of my meal.

I beg Patton to take my meat. (Our hosts speak no English.) Kind soul that he is, he
relieves me of the knee. The man of the house makes a comment, which Patton translates:
“She doesn’t like to eat?” He has seen Westerners who don’t have any children, who don’t
know how to shoot a rifle. Perhaps there are Westerners who don’t like eating. “She had
a big breakfast,” fibs Patton.

It was in fact a big breakfast, but I didn’t do very much having. Someone shot an
alligator, and I had some leg. (It’s a leg sort of day.) I have eaten alligator meat before, in
Florida, but someone, bless him, had taken it upon himself to remove the scales before
cooking it. (See “ghastly unchewables,” above.) I tried to pretend that the leg was
something else, something bland and comforting. After several false starts — Melba toast?
lettuce? — my brain, clearly shaken, presented me with “orange roughy.”

Patton maintains that the bulk of an Achuar’s daily calories do not come from meat.
They come from chicha, a mildly alcoholic, vaguely nutritious, watered-down manioc
mash. Achuar men drink up to four gallons a day. If you like chicha, you can live well in
Conambo. In about an hour, I will get to try it. Patton’s friend Isaac is hosting a minga, a
work party for the villagers who helped Isaac’s family dig a new manioc plot. It’s similar in
concept to the Amish barn-raising, with marathon chicha-drinking taking the place of
square-dancing.

I am of two minds about chicha. On the one hand, it’s a beverage. In the land of scary
food, the beverage is your friend. It’s the Tecate that washes down the menudo, the swig
of sake that makes the giant clam neck tolerable.

On the other hand. We are talking about a beverage fermented with human saliva.
Achuar women chew boiled manioc into the desired mashed-potato texture, and then spit-spray the contents of their bulging cheeks out into the chicha urn. While I know that,
percentage-wise, we’re talking a tiny fraction of the mixture, I’m having difficulty
embracing the idea. I have a little agreement with myself: When spittle finds its way onto
the ingredient list, I find a way to say no.

“You can’t say no,” says Patton, tossing ankle carcass to a cringing, harelipped dog.
“It’s just not done.”

Patton and I are seated on a low log bench in the open-walled platform that serves as
Isaac’s living room. The man of the house whittles blowgun darts as he chats. A pair of
black horn-rim glasses sits askew on his face. One lens is violently cracked, as though
someone stepped on it, though no one here has the kind of shoes for that. The floor is
dirty but uncluttered. Decor runs to parrot feathers and jaguar skulls, a government poster
urging vaccinations for children. In the corner, a little girl has set up a chicha tea party
with her dolls, the tenderness of the scene marred only by the knowledge that the tiny
chicha bowls are made from howler monkey voice boxes.

Isaac’s wife and mother are in constant motion, serving bowls of chicha to the 10 or
so guests. Chicha is the backbone of Achuar society. As with the ankle bone and the knee
bone, you feel an unalterable pressure to accept. Chicha is the holy communion, the
Manischewitz, the kava-kava of Achuar life. It’s present at every ceremony, every visit,
every meal. An Achuar woman’s desirability rests in no small part on her skill at chicha
brewing and serving.

Isaac’s mother dips a clay bowl into an urn of eggnog-hued liquid. Something slimy
dangles off the bottom of the bowl, waving howdy-doo as she crosses the floor to our
bench. Her hand is coated with a mucilaginous yellow fluid with flecks of manioc fiber.
The sidewalk outside a frat house on a Sunday morning comes, unbidden and unwelcome,
to mind.

“It’s Miller time,” says Patton as he takes the bowl. After 10 minutes, he warns, she’ll
return to take the bowl away and give it to someone else, most likely me. It is considered
irretrievably rude to refuse a bowl of chicha, or even to set it down. (In a maddening
instance of form following etiquette, the ceramic bowls in which chicha is served are
rounded on the bottom, so that the drinker cannot set one down without spilling the
contents.)

A refusal is interpreted as a bluff and triggers a ritualized pas de deux: “No, really, I
shouldn’t.” “Yes, yes, I insist.” Woe unto the visitor: The host never backs down.

Which means I have 10 minutes to talk myself out of the revulsion that’s building in
my gut, jostling for space among the pinworms and protozoa. My mouth is full of saliva
anyway, I tell myself. What’s a little more? Myself isn’t buying it. Myself is noting the vast
and unsettling difference between oral hygiene practices around the Amazon basin and
around the basin in our bathroom at home. This isn’t a matter of disgust, I tell Patton. It’s
a matter of gum disease.

Patton wipes manioc slime from his beard. Intelligent chicha drinkers, he holds, don’t
fret about the saliva it’s made with. They fret about the giardia and amoebas in the
unfiltered river water it’s made with. It is at this moment that Isaac’s mother gets up to
retrieve the chicha bowl from Patton, fill it to near overflow and present it to me.

The first thing that hits you is the smell. Fruity and fetid, a whiff of drinker’s breath on
a late-night bus. I put my lips to the rim of the bowl, bumpy-slimy with manioc pulp. I
hold my breath and drink.

The taste is not awful. It’s chalky, rummy, indifferent. But this was never about taste.
It’s about distaste. Did you ever drop something into a toilet and have to roll up your
sleeve and retrieve it? That’s how I’m feeling right now. Only I’ve got to keep going. I’ve
got to lift the lid, step right in, and hunker down in the toilet bowl. As soon as the level of
chicha lowers visibly, Isaac’s mother will step up to refill the bowl.

I disappoint and surprise myself. I come from a tribe that eats Vienna sausages. I
should be able to cope. But I can’t. I cannot drink this bowl of chicha.

An idea alights. I ask Patton to hold my bowl and rummage in my backpack for the
crinkle of airtight cellophane: a raspberry-chocolate Trader Joe’s energy bar. The room
falls abruptly quiet. Foreigner’s backpacks are known to hold all manner of otherworldly
wonders: sugar packets, earplugs, contact lenses. (The concept of bits of plastic aiding
vision is not easily absorbed. I recall the tale of a tribesman who pointed to a baby bottle nipple and asked, “Could I as well put
a piece of this in my eye?”)

The energy bar makes the rounds. A few of the men sniff at
it. Only Isaac takes a bite. He chews vigorously at first, then stops, suddenly and with
alarm, as though someone had snuck up behind him and put a gun to his head. His
eyebrows bunch together like drawn drapes. His lips go all abstract and jumpy. He stands,
grabs hold of a roof post, and spits forcefully. He coughs, arrghs, hawks, spits again.
Every few seconds, he looks back at me, his face changing channels from disgust to
bewilderment and back. After a good minute of this, he hands back the energy bar,
grinning now that the taste is gone, shaking his head at the foreigner’s unfathomable tastes.

The way I see it, permission has been granted to back out of the next bowl of chicha.

Continue Reading Close

The Inuit Olympics

Mary Roach reports on the Inuit Games, an annual competition involving Head Pulls, Knuckle Hops and other daunting competitions 100 miles north of the Arctic Circle.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Once you cross the Canadian border, sports start going strange on you. Football has three downs. A town will have a curling club instead of a bowling league. The farther north, the odder it gets. Golf is played on gravel and baseball has two bases.

I am 100 miles north of the Arctic Circle, about to watch a sporting event called the Head Pull. It’s part of the Baffin Inuit Games, being held in Igloolik, a small town on a small island off the northwest coast of Baffin Island. The Inuit Games are one of six annual Northern Games, held each summer in different regions of the Northwest Territories. (Canada’s Eskimos prefer to be called Inuit. “Eskimo” was originally a Cree epithet meaning “eater of raw flesh.” The Cree had obviously never tasted caribou sashimi.)

The Head Pull is pretty much what it sounds like: big strong men pulling on each other’s heads. Two Inuit lie face-to-face on their bellies, heads linked by a loop of canvas cargo webbing. At the signal, they attempt to pull one another, by the head, over the line between them.

The Inuit Games guidelines list 12 pulls. Not all of them will be part of the week’s events. The Ear Pull, for example, has been omitted owing to health and safety concerns. Ditto the Mouth Pull (“Competitor grabs mouth of opponent …”) and the Ear Lift (“The weight is looped around any ear and the competitor … walks forward, carrying it with his ear for as far a distance as his ear will allow”).

Aside from an occasional tendency toward the gruesome, the main identifying feature of Inuit sport is its compactness. Games are divided as follows: Pulls, pushes, reaches, kicks, twists and rotations. The entire Olympiad could be staged in a large walk-in closet.

It’s not for want of space. North of the tree line, space is the prevailing — one might almost say the only — geographical feature. Baffin is tundra, a scrabbly blanket of moss and shale laid out without a wrinkle. Up here, minute changes of elevation are optimistically dubbed hills. Caribou antlers are nailed up on posts, as though to compensate for the missing trees. (Lest you think it an unalluring locale, imagine a four-hour, 360-degree sunset at midnight.)

Inuit Games are compact for the simple reason that they are indoor sports. The Inuit practiced plenty of outdoor athletics — hunting, sledding, marathon walking — but this wasn’t sport, it was life. The Games were what you did to pass the time when the blizzards hit and you couldn’t see to hunt. And igloos were small — not much larger than the jump circle on a basketball court.

That is, in fact, where this week’s games are being staged: center court in the Ataguttaaluk School gymnasium. Igloolik has no sports arena or landscaped playing fields. This is less a matter of funding than of geology. North of 60 degrees latitude, the ground is permafrost: rock-hard most of the year, muck the rest of it. Grass won’t grow. Buildings have to be set on posts to keep from sinking in the thaw. Architectural diversity is more trouble than it’s worth; the town is basically boxes on a flat surface. I saw a picture of it in winter. It looked like inside my freezer.

The official motions for quiet. As the crowd numbers fewer than 100, this is not hard to achieve. However, as many are children, it is somewhat hard to maintain. A pair of toddlers are carrying out a competition of their own, the winner being the one who can shriek the loudest while running wind sprints across the gym floor. The athletes barely pay it mind. I remark on this to one of the coaches. “Why would they get mad?” he says. “If something messes you up, oh well. There’s other events.”

Competition runs somewhat counter to the Inuit character. To survive an Arctic winter, communities worked together and everything was shared. A great hunter had no more food than the next guy; he just threw more dinner parties. Why, then, have the games been turned into a competition? Because otherwise there would be no Inuit Games. Left to their own devices, modern Inuit teens prefer to spend their time playing basketball and watching Much TV (Canada’s answer to MTV). An impromptu survey of T-shirts and baseball caps in the gym today reveals 17 sports logos and 11 heavy metal bands.

This is not to say that the athletes don’t care whether they win. The winning team has a chance to compete in the international Arctic Winter Games. Depending on which country is hosting them, this could mean a trip to Russia, Finland, Greenland or Alaska.

Down in the ring, the winning head is nodding and grinning. It belongs to a local heart-breaker named Bobby. Someone has written “I love you, Bobby” in ball-point on his arm. Bobby wears a cigarette lighter in a fringed leather pouch around his neck, as though it were an ornament. Given that a pack of Rothmann’s costs more than $10, it may well be.

The irony of 24-hour daylight is that it happens where you need it least. Polar
towns provide the longest days in the world and very little to fill them with. Igloolik has
no restaurants, bars, movie theaters or museums. (Graffiti on the town water tank:
“What to do?”)

Games week is an exception. Every night there’s a community event: harpoon
throwing, drum dancing, a whipping contest (empty pop cans standing in for sled dogs).
Tonight it’s bannock-making. Bannock is a Scottish quickbread, introduced, along with
jigs, tea and tuberculosis, by whalers in the 19th century.

Bannock-making is part of the Good Woman contest. Before Inuit women won the
right to pull heads and twist fingers, their participation in the Northern Games was largely
limited to Good Woman competitions. “The Good Woman,” to quote official Games
literature, “is chosen for her skills and talent (seal-skinning, bannock-making, caribou-cutting, etc.) rather than her looks.”

The schedule says 7 p.m., but it doesn’t say where. Someone suggests the baseball
diamond. People up here are laboring under the delusion that it’s warm outside (it’s 40
degrees) and have scheduled most of the evening activities outdoors.

People are on the baseball diamond, but they’re not making bannock. I’m not altogether
sure what they’re doing. A batter has hit a fly ball, and a catcher has caught it. Rather than
return the ball to the pitcher, the catcher chases the batter and throws the ball at him. The
batter returns to the sidelines. He is apparently out, or perhaps just sore.

The man standing beside me says it’s a combination of “Northern” and regular baseball.

“How many strikes?” I ask him.

“They’re still trying to decide that.”

The Inuit are not big on rules. Earlier, I asked a Games official how many people there
are on a Northern baseball team. He replied that it didn’t matter, so long as “there’s lots of
people.” One of this evening’s teams appears to be a bit short. “Where are the
outfielders?” I ask the man next to me. He ponders this quietly. “They’re not out there. I
don’t know why.”

The bannock contest, it turns out, is over at the outdoor skating rink. As it’s summer,
there is no ice in the rink, only gravel and dirt. Igloolik’s skating rink looks very much like
its baseball diamond, which both look very much like the lawns, the hotel grounds and the
beach.

Women are hunkered down in front of portable Coleman stoves and great hulking
icebergs of Crisco. The winning sample is passed around. It’s sort of a round, oily biscuit,
or round, biscuity oil. I seek out the judge to ask how the winning entry tastes different
from the others.

“I don’t know,” he says. “I haven’t had any.”

“So how do you know hers is the best?”

“She finished first.” In a land with no timber and $1-an-ounce propane, a Good Woman is
one who can make four batches before the fire goes out.

Julie Oolayou is the Flo-Jo of the Inuit Games. She’s broken three records and is about to
break another, the One-Foot High Kick. Clarification: “One foot” refers to the number of
feet with which you kick, not the height of the kick (unless you are a visiting spastic
journalist, in which case it refers to both).

The high kick is one of the few Inuit games that require equipment. As a rule, Arctic
nomads tended to shun athletic endeavors that necessitated hauling racquets and shoulder
pads across the tundra. What little equipment is used tends to be things you’d find lying
around the igloo. Under the equipment heading for Parka Rotation, for example, the text
reads simply, “big parka.” Traditionally, the high kick target was hung from the ceiling
of the igloo. Here, it hangs from a wooden high kick stand, a simple, spindly gallows,
like what you draw to play Hangman.

Oolayou removes one shoe and one sock, revealing an ankle bracelet and an Edmonton
Oilers rub-on tattoo. She takes three easy strides, crouches and springs, clearing seven
feet the way other people hop a curb.

Next up is Oolayou’s rival, Leona Nakashuk. She spits on her sneaker soles. She eyes
the target, a small sealskin seal hanging at eye level. In the stands, an old man begins
chanting songs of the elders. Rattled, Nakashuk breaks her advance. “Anaq!” (This is a
word in Inuktitut, the Inuit native tongue. It means, “Shit.”)

Six minutes and as many false starts go by. There seems to be no time limit. This
doesn’t surprise me. Where day goes on all night and night is six months long, time is a
fuzzy concept. Ask someone how long it takes to cross the bay by motorboat, and he’ll
answer you in gallons, not minutes. I ask games coordinator Angie Luciani if the lack of
time limit has to do with the Inuit concept of time. Actually, it has more to do with the
Inuit concept of planning. “There’s supposed to be a three-minute limit,” Luciani says.
“But nobody brought a stopwatch.”

To understand the Knuckle Hop, it helps to have played Bloody Knuckles. To be sure,
strength and skill are required — you are hopping on toes and fists with your body flat-out
rigid in between. But what is key here is that you are landing on your knuckles. With no
gloves. On a wood floor. The Knuckle Hop, says acting official Gabriel Nirlungayuk, “is
about how much pain you can endure.”

The most coveted seats, therefore, are the ones with a view of the nurses’ station. I
watch as a succession of grimacing men run up and plunge their fists into bowls of ice
water. Their knuckles are dotted with round raw nicks, as though someone went after
them with a potato peeler.

There is no Women’s Knuckle Hop. This is either outrageous sexism on the part of the
men, or outrageous good sense on the part of the women.

I can’t tell you much about the closing ceremonies, as they’re being held in Inuktitut. The
mayor is giving a speech, and the audience has taken the opportunity to chat with their
friends about the polar bear spotted outside town and the rumor that star athlete Kristine
Ootova has a hickey beneath her scarf. It is unclear whether this has to do with the
popularity of the mayor (low) or the popularity of speeches (very low). (Earlier this week, a
visiting politician stopped his speech to reassure his straying audience that he was “almost
finished, OK?”)

The mayor passes the ceremonial blubber lamp (Baffin’s answer to the Olympic torch) to
the mayor of Hall Beach, site of next year’s games. The Inuit Games are officially closed.
A group of athletes pushes aside the folding chairs and the High Kick seal and breaks out
a box of basketballs.

Continue Reading Close

White dreams

Mary Roach explains why she was wandering around Antarctica with a white plastic garbage pail over her head.

  • more
    • All Share Services

People who live in Antarctica develop an eye for whites. One day last year, while skidooing the two miles from McMurdo Base to his classroom out on the Ross Ice Shelf, U.S. Antarctic Program survival instructor Bill McCormick spotted a piece of white styrofoam on the snow. You have to admit it’s impressive, an ocular achievement akin to spotting a Wheatie in your All-Bran.

McCormick’s two-day cold weather survival course is a requirement for new Antarctica arrivals who plan to spend any time in the field. That includes both researchers and support staff, plus the occasional visiting journalist. Students learn how to build emergency snow shelters (igloos, trenches) and operate shortwave radios, and how not to get frostbite or hypothermia doing it.

McCormick, a 48-year-old mountaineering guide from Colorado, is at this moment lecturing on an extremely white weather condition called whiteout. Every fourth or fifth sentence he breaks stride for a swallow of coffee, which he takes black. Whiteouts are snowstorms so trumped-up and incorrigible that ground and air, horizon and sky, are indistinguishable, a colorless, directionless chowder of fog and snow. McCormick has seen people get lost on the 50-foot walk from his classroom to the outhouse. (Another reason to be wary of ice-sheet outhouses: Seals occasionally use the opening in the ice as a blowhole. While there’s nothing inherently dangerous about a suppositorial blast of hot seal breath, it is, in the words of one shaken veteran, “a disquieting way to start your day.”)

McCormick tried for years to come up with an accurate description of what it’s like to be in a whiteout. What he finally settled on was being outdoors with a white plastic garbage pail over your head. This gave him an idea. To make his search-and-rescue exercises more challenging for his students (and more entertaining for himself), McCormick requisitioned a stack of white plastic garbage pails.

In this afternoon’s search-and-rescue exercise, McCormick is taking the role of the lost victim. A small group of students is given a coil of rope, a sheaf of trail marker flags, garbage pails and instructions to go out and find their instructor without getting lost themselves. That done, McCormick disappears into the almost painful brightness of an Antarctic afternoon.

Steve, a carpenter from Colorado, suggests looping the rope around
everyone’s waist
and sweeping back and forth in a line, windshield wiper-style. “What if he’s
gone beyond
the edge of the windshield?” wonders Kevin, a plumber with a Marlboro more or
less
permanently attached to his face. The class thinks about this for a while.
Every now and
again, a plaintive “help” issues from somewhere beyond the back door.

Steve is plotting strategy like a high school football coach, filling the
chalkboard with
arrows and semicircles. “We’ll cover from here to here, plant a marker, come
back, untie
the rope, retrace our steps to here …”

A man who studies nematodes for a living wants to know what the other end
of the rope
is tied to. Kevin wants to know who died and made Steve king. Someone else is
proposing
a “sort of backwards, lying-down human pyramid.”

“Help …”

“I’ll go boil some hot water,” says Kevin, as though perhaps McCormick had
gone into
labor.

Ten minutes pass. McCormick’s face appears in the window. It’s a face that
long ago
signed a pact with the sun. “Remember me?” he yells through the glass. “I’m
very cold.”

Abandoning all hope of an organized rescue effort, the rescuers don garbage
pails, loop
the rope around themselves and make their way out the door, lurching and
groping.
Eventually someone trips over McCormick, who is then rolled onto Kevin’s parka
and
dragged across the snow. At some point, probably the point where Kevin trips
over the
rope and the nematode guy falls over, McCormick has flopped onto his face.
“Hey, look,”
says Kevin. “We suffocated him.”

Steve wants to do CPR. Kevin is going through McCormick’s pockets. Mount
Erebus
lounges on the horizon, puffing peaceably.

Back in the classroom, McCormick delivers his critique. The words “might
have been
wiser” figure prominently. Had this been a real emergency, McCormick would have
suffered severe frostbite. “Severe,” in this case, is not merely an adjective
but an official
frostbite category, the other three being Superficial, Deep and Profound. In
the Antarctic
winter, when windchill bullies the mercury into negative triple digits, a man
can get
frostbite in the time it takes to find his fly. “Know your layers,” says
McCormick, who has
a way of being superficial and profound at the same time.

In keeping with the experiential nature of the course, dinner takes the
form of survival
bag rations. All Antarctic flights and field expeditions carry survival bags:
canvas duffels
with shovels for building snow shelters, camp stoves that can run on plane
fuel and a few
vacuum-packed backpacking meals to keep your stomach quiet while you freeze.
Kevin,
tackling dehydrated Turkey Teriyaki, describes the food as “a little preview of
death.”

It’s 9 p.m., time to turn in. The nematode people take the igloo,
leaving the rest of the
group to share a Scott tent, a bulky teepee-like affair made of bright yellow
canvas that
blocks most of the wind and some of the sun. (Antarctica in summer presents the
uncommon and inadvisable option of tanning while you sleep.) The inside of the
tent has
an amber glow, like going to sleep with a yellow plastic garbage pail over
your head.

Continue Reading Close

Page 6 of 6 in Mary Roach