<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Michael Castleman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/michael_castleman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I was a middle-aged virgin&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/08/virgin_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/08/virgin_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2003/10/08/virgin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger is 49 years old and has only had intercourse once -- with a surrogate.  He's not alone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Andrews, of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., is 49 years old and has never had a sexual relationship with anyone except himself. In fact, he's had intercourse just once -- in July 2003 with a surrogate partner he engaged to help him, in his words, "get over his terrible handicap and join the world." </p><p>To look at Roger you'd never imagine his secret, or the deep shame he has suffered because of it. He's an attractive man: light complexion, thinning blond hair, strong chin. He's a successful computer engineer. He has friendly dealings with co-workers and clients. He's smart, articulate and insightful, especially about the issue that makes him "a freak." He's a jazz drummer, and he showed enough acting talent in college to consider a theater career. He's well traveled, and has scuba-dived all over the Caribbean. But he's always been shy and never learned how to have an intimate relationship. "I never grew up in that way," he says. </p><p>Roger is not alone. There are no studies on the prevalence of virginity over 30, but many of the nation's sex therapists report a small, steady stream of older-virgin clients. During 23 years in practice, California psychologist David Johnston says he's counseled 50 middle-aged virgins, collaborating with various surrogate partners. "One was 72. A few have been women. But the vast majority have been men in their 30s or 40s." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/10/08/virgin_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/08/virgin_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erotic by nature</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/03/steinberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/03/steinberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/galleries/2003/10/03/steinberg</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Steinberg talks about the sexually frank photographs he's collected and how he thinks they can change the culture.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, David Steinberg is the Allan Freed of sexual photography. Freed was the pioneering Cleveland DJ who, in the mid-1950s, introduced suburban white kids to the driving beat and emotional authenticity of African-American rhythm and blues. Steinberg is leading an equally daring cultural revolution -- an effort to free sexual photography from decades of wholesale dismissal as "pornography" and have it taken seriously as fine art. </p><p>Steinberg is the creative force behind "Photo Sex: Fine Art Sexual Photography Comes of Age," a collection of 115 exuberantly erotic images by 31 of the world's leading sexual photographers. "Photo Sex," says New York photography critic A. D. Coleman, "represents a generational shift in the social acceptability of frankness about sexuality and its representation. It offers tangible evidence that the current administration in Washington in no way represents a majority of this country's electorate, who would, given a fair chance, reject its cultural neoconservatism. It shows us that this country's attitudes regarding matters sexual have changed radically, most probably, for the long term." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/10/03/steinberg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/03/steinberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The two worlds of Veronica Monet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/23/veronica/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/23/veronica/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2002/10/23/veronica</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's married to the love of her life. And he kisses her goodbye when she jets off to satisfy other men's fantasies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the call came, the striking blonde whose professional name is Veronica Monet donned a gray wool pinstripe Escada suit with a skirt cut slightly above the knee. She packed an overnight bag with the tools of her trade: condoms, lube, a sheer French maid's outfit and a $2,000 black cashmere cocktail dress by Armani. </p><p>The client was a regular, so she did not request her usual 10 percent deposit upfront. He said he would pay by check when she arrived in Chicago. That was a relief. Monet, 42, never discusses her fee, but says that other jet-set escorts typically charge several thousand dollars for a one-day date -- and she dislikes flying home with that much cash. Like most of her other clients, this man was white, married, around 50. A well-educated, self-made multimillionaire. He was into art, so on the way to the airport, she picked up a few art magazines to immerse herself in his interest. At SFO, a round-trip business-class e-ticket was waiting for her. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/10/23/veronica/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/23/veronica/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Kamasutra&#8221; redux</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/29/kamasutra_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/29/kamasutra_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2002 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2002/05/29/kamasutra</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Hindu world the pursuit of sexual pleasure was revered as a sort of religious quest. Imagine a world where getting laid was just as important as going to church on Easter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows the "Kamasutra" is ancient India's racy sex manual. The title conjures titillating visions of erotic frescos in which regal maharajas with outsized genitals cavort with naked bejeweled nymphs in positions exotic enough to slip the discs of a yoga master. </p><p>But few Americans have read it -- not even the "good parts," the sexual positions that made the book famous, but that account for only about one-quarter of its length (46 of 172 pages). Even those who have read the major English translation of the "Kamasutra" have not fully appreciated the book because that translation -- how can I put this delicately? Well, it sucks. It dates from 1883 and was published just once in the U.S., 40 years ago in 1962. Richard Burton, the British army officer responsible for it, was the editor from hell. He altered the text considerably to shoehorn it into Victorian views about sexuality, notably the then popular notions that only men experience sexual desire and pleasure, and that women are nothing more than the passive recipients of men's lust. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/05/29/kamasutra_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/29/kamasutra_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too sexy for her rocker</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/03/27/dodson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/03/27/dodson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2002 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2002/03/27/dodson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Betty Dodson is 72 and Eric Wilkinson is 25, and after three years together they are still hot and heavy -- and happy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 1971 cult classic "Harold and Maude," Ruth Gordon plays a wacky 79-year-old who teaches a depressed man of 20 or so, played by Bud Cort, to value life. In the process he falls in love with her. </p><p>Betty Dodson, 72, and Eric Wilkinson, 25, are not Harold and Maude, but their age difference invites comparisons. When they became an item three years ago, friends teased them about the movie -- which appeared several years before Wilkinson was born. </p><p>"I never even heard of it till I got involved with Betty," Wilkinson explains. "But there's no comparison. Harold and Maude were just friends. We're lovers. We've spent entire days in bed together." </p><p>"Oh sure, we got Harold-and-Maude teasing," Betty recalls. "So, I'm so much older. But so what? When men have girlfriends or marry much younger women, no one bats an eye. But the other way around is a big deal. What we have here is a sexual double standard. The teasing stopped pretty quickly when our friends and families accepted our relationship. In our social circle, things feel comfortable now." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/03/27/dodson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/03/27/dodson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lubes and HIV</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/16/lubes_hiv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/16/lubes_hiv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2002/01/16/lubes_hiv</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A research study shows that some sexual lubricants may kill the AIDS virus.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Condoms every time. If you're in a new relationship or nonmonogamous, that's one of the most important ways of preventing infection with HIV, the AIDS virus, according to health officials. But with more than 6 million new HIV infections annually, it's clear that many people don't use condoms every time. </p><p>At the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, a team led by noted virus researcher Samuel Baron, M.D., a professor of microbiology, has discovered what could be another promising way to reduce risk of HIV transmission -- three safe, inexpensive, widely available sexual lubricants. </p><p>With financing from the National Institutes of Health, the MacArthur Foundation and the University of Texas, Baron's team mixed small amounts of 22 over-the-counter sexual lubricants with similar amounts of HIV-infected semen. A day later, the semen was analyzed for the presence of HIV using virus-counting methods standard in AIDS research. Three of the lubricants reduced HIV replication by more than 99.9 percent. Results of the study were published in November in one of the many peer-reviewed medical journals rarely read by the news media or the public, "AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses." Salon read the report and interviewed Baron by phone. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/01/16/lubes_hiv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/16/lubes_hiv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ArginMax effect</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/12/05/arginmax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/12/05/arginmax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2001 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/12/05/arginmax</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent Stanford study shows a dietary supplement can boost some women's sex drive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago Hendy Lund, then a 30-year-old computer networking professional in Silicon Valley, enjoyed making love with her husband almost every night. In just a few months, and for no apparent reason, her libido vanished. "We went from doing it almost daily to doing it maybe once a month -- and even that was more than I really wanted." </p><p>Lund pondered possible reasons for the abrupt change in sexual desire. "I was working long hours for a start-up. But I'd had intense jobs for years. My problem didn't seem connected to anything at work. Steve and I had been together awhile, and over time, sexual intensity usually diminishes. But this was more than cooling. All of a sudden, I was in the freezer. Honestly, I had no idea why I lost my libido. But it was like I was a car whose engine would grind and grind but never quite turn over." </p><p>Lund's husband, Steve, then 35 and in the process of switching careers from health care to law enforcement, wasn't pleased with having sex just once a month. He and Hendy remained close and committed to one another, but agreed that the libido loss strained their marriage. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/12/05/arginmax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/12/05/arginmax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A call to yawns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/29/satcher_rant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/29/satcher_rant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/06/29/satcher_rant</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Satcher was brave to release a report that says abstinence isn't everything, but it's up to us to change the culture.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media pundits are touting Surgeon General David Satcher's just-released report, "A Call to Action to Promote Sexual Health and Responsible Behavior," as "far reaching." How far does it actually reach? About as far as my hand reaches to cover my mouth when I yawn -- which is precisely what I'm doing over this report. </p><p>To Dr. Satcher's credit, he takes some modestly progressive stands on sexuality: Homosexuals are human beings. Sexual orientation can't be changed. Abstinence-based school sex education programs don't work. Kids should be taught about contraceptives and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). And in the real world, sex often begins before marriage. </p><p>But in the same report, the surgeon general also takes some sexually conservative stands: Abstinence is the best way to deal with the threats of STDs and unwanted pregnancy. Sex before marriage is OK only in the context of a committed, enduring, monogamous relationship. </p><p>The progressive elements are news only to the hopelessly clueless. And the conservative elements pander to the current powers that be. Basically, the new report is a hopeless mishmash of contradictory platitudes that will be forgotten by the time the ink is dry on tomorrow's headlines. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/29/satcher_rant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/29/satcher_rant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solo pleasure</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/23/solo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/23/solo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2001 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/05/23/solo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former sex columnist answers the most common masturbation questions and wonders why it's still taboo to talk about what we all do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For many years, I've been part of a nine-man social group. We meet twice a month, take turns making dinner and end up talking sports, politics, work, marriage, children, money, parents and -- of course -- sex. </p><p> Within the bounds of self-revelation comfort levels, I'm pretty well informed about the sexual issues in several of the marriages in our group. But I'm relatively unaware of my friends' masturbation habits. And I haven't discussed mine. If the subject comes up, which it rarely does, there is nervous laughter along with acknowledgment that we all indulge. </p><p>It's not hard to understand why it's easier to discuss partner sex than the solo variety. Our culture is obsessed with partner sex. Depictions of it are ubiquitous, in both positive images (movies, books, music) and negative (AIDS, STDs and controversy over sex education and federal funding for family planning). Masturbation is still largely in the closet. It occupies the position partner sex held in the 1950s -- it's simply not discussed. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/23/solo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/23/solo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;So, what do you think, am I normal?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/15/columnists_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/15/columnists_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2001 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/03/15/columnists_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How the Web has changed access to sex information -- and the kind of advice people seek. Second of two parts.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"We live in a culture obsessed with sex," says San Francisco sex authority Sandor Gardos, "but basic sexuality information often gets lost. It's difficult to assign meaningful blame. Sure, the government, parents, political conservatives and the media deserve some share of it, but we also have thousands of years of cultural history that got us to this point." </p><p>In Gardos' view, one hopeful development for increasing access to information about sexuality is the Web: "For the first time ever, people with Web access are only a few clicks away from at least some good sex information. Before the Web, if you were a teen in a small, conservative town, or gay, or a fetishist of some sort, it may have been very difficult to find the information you were looking for. [Now] you can ask your questions, find people like you. People submit questions to <a target="new" href="http://www.thriveonline.oxygen.com/sex/">Thrive</a> anonymously, but from the way they're written, I'd guess that about half come from teens. I think that's why I get so many questions asking: 'Could I be pregnant?'" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/03/15/columnists_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/15/columnists_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can dry humping get me pregnant?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/14/columnists_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/14/columnists_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/03/14/columnists_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to sex-advice columnists Americans today aren't much better informed than their grandparents were. First of two parts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Why do I sneeze after orgasm? I don't have allergies. Am I allergic to orgasm?" </p><p>"I've been scanning the personal ads, and I've come across a few abbreviations I don't understand. Can you explain: BBW, HWP, GS and WFW?" </p><p>"Are there any products that can keep my nipples erect? I sometimes like the look of my erect nipples showing through my clothing. What do you suggest besides ice cubes?" </p><p>"I keep coming across the term 'fisting' but have been too shy to actually ask anyone what it is. Is it pretty much what it sounds like or is there more to it?" </p><p>These are just some of the thousands of questions the nation's sex advice columnists receive every month. Chip Rowe, who writes the Advisor column in Playboy, fields some 500 a month. He and two colleagues answer every one of them and select about a dozen for publication in the magazine and on the <a target="new" href="http://www.playboyadvisor.com">Playboy Advisor Web site.</a> Louanne Weston, a sex therapist in Fair Oaks, Calif., gets 1,500 questions a month as the Sex Matters advice columnist for <a target="new" href="http://www.onhealth.com">OnHealth.com</a> (recently acquired by WebMD). San Francsico sexuality authority Sandor Gardos receives 2,500 questions <i>a week</i> as the sex advice columnist for <a target="new" href="http://www.thriveonline.oxygen.com/sex/">Thriveonline/Oxygen.</a> That's 10,000 a month. "Answering sex questions is a dirty job," Playboy's Rowe says, "but someone has to do it." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/03/14/columnists_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/14/columnists_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wet is best</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/01/lubicrant_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/01/lubicrant_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2001 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/02/01/lubicrant_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to lubrication, Masters and Johnson got it wrong. Second of two parts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans have been misled about sexual lubrication. In the 1960s, pioneering sex researchers William Masters and Virginia Johnson described vaginal lubrication as one aspect of initial sexual arousal in women. They maintained that the vagina produces lubrication fairly quickly as women become aroused. But for many perfectly normal women, vaginal lubrication takes much longer to appear, and when it does, there may not be much of it. </p><p>To make matters worse, the erotic stories in sex publications such as Penthouse imply that every woman self-lubricates like Niagara Falls at the wink of an alluring eye: "Just being near Bill made my panties wet." Not only is this way off the mark, but it has led to a destructive corollary, the notion that if a woman does not produce much natural lubrication, she is neither turned on by her lover nor committed to the relationship. </p><p>Instant gushing lubrication may happen to some women. But it's much more common for a woman to feel committed to her relationship and erotically aroused by her lover, and still not self-lubricate much, if at all. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/02/01/lubicrant_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/01/lubicrant_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smooth sex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/31/lubricant_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/31/lubricant_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/01/31/lubricant_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything you've always wanted to know about lubrication but were afraid to ask.
First of two parts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They had been lovers for 15 years and married for seven. She was a nurse; he was a partner in a small business. They were in their late 30s and were erotically very comfortable with each other. </p><p>He knew that she loved to be caressed lightly all over with just his fingertips, loved to have him nibble on her earlobes while whispering sexy intentions, loved his lips and tongue playing first with one nipple, then the other, and particularly loved his tongue swirling on her clitoris, around her vulva and inside her. </p><p>She knew that he loved the noises she made when aroused, loved it when she ran her fingernails from the top of his head down his neck and back and over his butt, loved the way she climbed on him when he lay on his back and sat on his penis, and particularly loved the way she sucked its head while stroking the shaft with one hand and cupping his balls in the other. </p><p>He always waited until she was good and wet to enter her and, during intercourse, they both enjoyed a slow, sensual rhythm, alternating fucking with tongue play until they alternated orgasms. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/01/31/lubricant_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/01/31/lubricant_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teach your children well</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/11/education_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/11/education_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2000/12/11/education</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both liberal and conservative sex ed activists have it wrong: We should stop saying that sex is dangerous and help parents talk to their kids instead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For 40 years now, liberals and conservatives have waged war over sexual politics. Conservatives have fought bitterly against abortion, portrayals of sex in the media and sex education in public schools, castigating them as clear signs of national moral decay. They have promoted abstinence until marriage as the answer to everything from teen pregnancy to AIDS. With equal passion, liberals have championed women's right to abortion and teachers' right to discuss contraception and prevention of sexually transmitted diseases, insisting that such information is the answer to everything from teen pregnancy to AIDS. </p><p>The two groups' views appear diametrically opposed. But based on my five years of experience in family planning and teen sex education, and 25 years of writing about sexuality, it has become clear to me that the two sides are not the Hatfields and the McCoys. They're actually Romeo and Juliet, hailing from feuding clans but mainly in bed with each other. This may be a shock to readers with only a newspaper's-eye view of sexual politics, but when it comes to teens and sex, liberals and conservatives have very similar core values. Neither of their approaches to sex education makes sense (though the liberal view is a tad more realistic). And neither of their programs does much except create fear of sex. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/11/education_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/11/education_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wonderful Wellbutrin?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/26/wellbutrin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/26/wellbutrin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2000/09/26/wellbutrin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most antidepressants suppress sex drive, but some new evidence suggests this one might be different.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the dozen years since it was first introduced, Prozac and its close chemical relatives, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs (Paxil, Zoloft, Luvox and Celexa), have become the nation's most popular antidepressants. They do a great job of parting the black clouds of depression, and many people swear that SSRIs have improved their lives dramatically. </p><p>But in addition to typical antidepressant side effects -- nausea, nervousness, insomnia, diarrhea, dry mouth and tremor (hand shaking) -- the SSRIs have become notorious for causing <a href="/health/sex/urge/2000/05/17/sex_drugs/index.html">sex problems</a>: libido loss, weak orgasms, difficulty in reaching or inability to reach orgasm and, in men, erection impairment. Depending on the study, 50 to 80 percent of SSRI users report at least one sexual side effect. Many SSRI users insist they are willing to forgo sexual satisfaction to escape from the horrors of depression. But others are unhappy about SSRI-induced sex problems. </p><p>Unfortunately, few people know that another antidepressant, Wellbutrin (chemical name: bupropion), is as effective as the SSRIs -- but much less likely to cause sexual side effects. And most don't know that several studies have shown that Wellbutrin has sex-enhancing effects. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/26/wellbutrin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/26/wellbutrin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Porn-star secrets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/06/hair_removal_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/06/hair_removal_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2000 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2000/09/06/hair_removal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Going naked in front of the camera necessitates lots of hair-removal tricks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, the vast majority of women in porn have smooth-shaven vulvas, or close to it. What's shaved always looks very smooth. Silky smooth. Baby smooth. And if you've ever tried to duplicate that "porn smooth" look, <i>impossibly</i> smooth. What's the porn stars' secret? </p><p>"I wish I knew," sighs Louanne Cole-Weston, a sex therapist in the Sacramento, Calif., area, who is the <a target="new" href="http://www.sexmatters.com/">"Sex Matters"</a> columnist for <a target="new" href="http://www.OnHealth.com/home/index.asp">OnHealth.com.</a> "But I'll tell you one thing: There's a surprising amount of interest in pubic hair removal. The recent column I did on it got more responses than anything else I've ever written for 'Sex Matters' -- and not just from women. Many men are interested in getting rid of their pubic hair, too. I was surprised at all the interest." </p><p>It's not easy to track the history of pubic presentation. Ancient Chinese, Greek and Roman erotic art generally depict genitals -- both male and female -- without pubic hair. Did the ancients remove it? Or did the artists simply not include it? Art historians are silent on the subject. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/06/hair_removal_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/06/hair_removal_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can needles heal crackheads?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/16/acupuncture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/16/acupuncture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/08/16/acupuncture</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A groundbreaking study says they can and do, helping acupuncture inch toward Western acceptance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I never would have done this had I not wanted my kids back," confides former crack addict Valerie Wilkerson, "But it was my last chance." </p><p>A lot of addicts have come to that turning point where they must change their lives or lose everything they care about. But the problem was that Wilkerson had been there before. Again and again. Despite the birth of six children whom she loved, and repeated attempts to commit herself to rehab, she never was able to stop. She'd been addicted to crack since she was a teenager and she'd just about resigned herself to a miserable fate. </p><p>But when New York child welfare authorities seized her children and placed them in foster homes, the 36-year-old decided to try one last time to escape the drug that had destroyed her life. </p><p>"I went to court," she explains, "and they told me the only way I could get my kids back was to stop using. They gave me a list of rehab programs, including the acupuncture program at Lincoln Hospital, which sounded good to me. At Lincoln, they put the little needles in my ears. I had no drug cravings. It was amazing. I've been off drugs for two years now. I have a good job, and I got my kids back." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/16/acupuncture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/16/acupuncture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The worst diagnosis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/01/alzheimers_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/01/alzheimers_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/02/01/alzheimers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An intellectual couple facing Alzheimer&#039;s finds  great love and tenderness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The absentminded professor. That's how Ann Davidson often thought of her husband, Julian. A handsome, quick-witted man with roots in Scotland, Julian spent virtually his entire career as a professor of physiology at Stanford University. He looked the part of the academic, with rumpled casual clothes, wire-rimmed glasses, an ambling gait, a graying beard, receding curly gray hair, a deep love of classical music, and an air of perpetual preoccupation as he pedaled his bike daily from their large, comfortable ranch home on the prestigious campus to his office and back.</p><p>During their 37 years of marriage, Ann and Julian raised three children. Ann trained as a speech pathologist and worked part-time while their children were growing up. The children went off to college, and later their daughter produced three grandchildren.</p><p>Over the decades, Ann adjusted to her husband's workaholic preoccupation with his career, admiring his intellect and fretting with him over his lectures, grant applications, journal articles, committee responsibilities, and the vagaries of academic politics. Of course, she got annoyed when she realized, too frequently, that Julian was not giving her his undivided attention. She did not like to repeat herself or say, "Julian, listen," because he was off in some physiological reverie instead of focusing on her. He <i>was</i> the classic absent-minded professor. Ann was forever reminding him not to forget his briefcase, or his keys, or his brothers' birthdays, or the dinner or concert date they had in the evening.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/01/alzheimers_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/01/alzheimers_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

