<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Nell Bernstein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/nell_bernstein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The war off drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/26/drug_reform_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/26/drug_reform_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/06/26/drug_reform</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The success of a California measure that offers drug offenders treatment before prison points a way out of the drug-war stalemate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inside Room 175 of the Contra Costa County courthouse, 20 miles east of San Francisco, men and women in yellow jumpsuits press themselves up to the barred windows of a Plexiglas-enclosed jury box that holds in-custody defendants. They are straining to hear drug counselors describe a new twist in the justice system, a change that to some must sound like a dream -- or a trick. Since when is compassion the punishment for drug crimes? </p><p>In California, since November 2000, when voters passed the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act, or Proposition 36. Under Prop. 36, people convicted of drug possession are automatically steered to rehab rather than to jail. They still report to a probation officer, and the stick of incarceration hovers over their heads should they rack up three "treatment failures." But the state has effectively shifted its philosophy for dealing with drug offenders, replacing a harshly punitive response with an offer of recovery. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/06/26/drug_reform_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/26/drug_reform_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;White Oleander&#8221; unplugged</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/03/like_family_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/03/like_family_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2003 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2003/04/03/like_family</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In her remarkable and unsentimental new memoir, "Like Family: Growing Up in Other People's Houses," Paula McLain recalls a tumultuous childhood in the foster care system.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Dogs are easy. If their tails are up and their eyes soft, you're in." </p><p> From the remarkable opening line, "Like Family: Growing Up in Other People's Houses" is like nothing else yet written about the experience of foster care. Billed as a "real-life <a href="/ent/movies/review/2002/10/11/white_oleander/">'White Oleander,'" </a> Paula McLain's gentle memoir is at once less and much more than the bestselling novel turned Hollywood melodrama. There's no murder, no suicide -- no role for Michelle Pfeiffer or Ren&eacute;e Zellweger -- no drama, in fact, save that of a life unfolding within, and despite, the terrible void of the child welfare system. </p><p> McLain is a small child, the middle of three sisters living with their parents in Fresno, Calif., when her family embarks on what will be their last collective outing. A lyrical account of a trip to the drive-in -- "everything was monsters and stars in the Morse-code night" -- bleeds into disaster when McLain's father decides to go back after the movie to rob the ticket window. He is promptly arrested and jailed. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/04/03/like_family_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/03/like_family_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The drug war&#8217;s littlest victims</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/30/drug_measures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/30/drug_measures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2002/10/30/drug_measures</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Measures to put drug abusers in rehab instead of jail could rescue their kids from the cycle of addiction, foster care and crime.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The last time Tracy Carter, a longtime drug user, was sent to the county jail, she ran into her mother. Neither woman was surprised. Carter's parents are both longtime heroin addicts. Her sister is a heroin addict. Carter says she herself was born a heroin addict. So were most of her seven children. </p><p>Carter (not her real name), 38, has been in and out of jail throughout her long career as an addict, mostly for violating her probation. She has come out each time -- homeless, jobless and full of good intentions -- and started using again within a matter of weeks or months. This grim routine has left her children trapped in a grueling cycle themselves: bouncing from one home to another; vacillating between faith and despair as their mother makes and breaks promise after promise; and, as they grow up without her, drifting into depression, delinquency and addictions of their own. </p><p>In November 2000, California voters decided it was time for Tracy Carter, and drug users like her, to try something different. With 61 percent of the vote, they passed Proposition 36, a measure that sends most nonviolent drug offenders into treatment rather than to jail. Two years later, similar initiatives are on the ballot in Ohio and the District of Columbia; several more states have implemented or are working on legislative fixes to tough drug laws; and more than 70 percent of Americans are telling pollsters they'd like to see the government ease up on addicts. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/10/30/drug_measures/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/30/drug_measures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Punishment for the whole family</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/08/contact_visits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/08/contact_visits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2002 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2002/05/08/contact_visits</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California prison officials want to prohibit parents convicted  of drug offenses from touching   their children -- even infants and toddlers --   for one year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marie (not her real name) remembers the look on her 2-year-old daughter's face as the child pressed herself against the inch-thick window that separated the two. The toddler pounded on the glass partition with tiny fists, calling out and crying. "Come on, Mom! Come out of there!" </p><p>Marie could only watch and reach out in a futile response. A prisoner in county jail, she was forbidden to have contact with her child. It was another four months before finally, upon her release, Marie was able to touch her daughter. </p><p>"It was awful," she says. "I've always had her with me, ever since she was born, and then all of a sudden she was snatched away from me. I know I felt bad, so she must have felt even worse, because she didn't understand. She must have thought I didn't want her anymore." </p><p>If sweeping changes in prison visitation rules proposed by the California Department of Corrections (CDC) become law, Marie's experience is likely to be repeated in state prisons across the state, where prisoners with drug-related convictions will be barred for the first year of their terms from contact visits with anyone, including their children. Often a rule of incarceration in county jails, a ban on contact visits in state prisons, where inmates serve much longer sentences, is rare. And, according to research, it is potentially harmful to inmates and their children. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/05/08/contact_visits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/08/contact_visits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Without a nest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/03/27/emancipate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/03/27/emancipate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2002 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2002/03/27/emancipate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Is it surprising that foster kids, in the face of forced independence at the age of 18, might go to extraordinary lengths to postpone adulthood?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be it fact or fiction, we love the story of a con: The affable stranger drifts into town, spins a good yarn and takes everybody for a ride. In <a href="/ent/movies/dvd/review/2000/09/08/six_degrees_separation/index.html">"Six Degrees of Separation,"</a> it's a hustler who convinces a wealthy Manhattan couple that he's their son's Harvard classmate. In the new documentary "Con Man," James Hogue passes himself off first as an orphaned track star at Palo Alto High School, then as a self-educated ranch hand at Princeton. </p><p>And now there is Treva Throneberry, a woman who spent her 20s traveling from town to town, skipping from identity to identity, always posing as a high school student, until finally, after more than a decade, she was found out and prosecuted for defrauding the state. According to writer Emily White, who profiled Throneberry in the New York Times Magazine, the perennially young scam artist was mysterious and insistent, "fixated on 18 as some kind of Rubicon she could not cross; she didn't believe in her own existence after that threshold." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/03/27/emancipate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/03/27/emancipate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Out of the big house and into the trenches</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/30/clemency_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/30/clemency_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2001/08/30/clemency_women</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imprisoned under mandatory sentencing, freed by President Clinton, now Kemba Smith and Dorothy Gaines, ex-con mothers, have to get their kids to school on time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kemba Smith and Dorothy Gaines met in 1995 inside a federal prison in Danbury, Conn. The two women quickly found they had a lot in common. Neither had sold drugs but both were there on drug charges. Both had been convicted under <a>conspiracy laws</a> that held them accountable for their boyfriends' crimes. Both -- like a grossly disproportionate number of those doing time on drug charges -- are black. </p><p>Gaines, a nurse's assistant, had dated a drug user who was part of a crack ring in Mobile, Ala. Several of his associates testified that she had kept crack at her house and delivered it when told -- allegations she denies. She was convicted in federal court solely on the word of witnesses who received sentence reductions in return for their testimony. Smith was a freshman at Hampton University in Virginia when she too made the mistake of dating a drug dealer. He was found murdered before he could be tried and Smith was held responsible for his activities. </p><p>Both women received brutally long mandatory sentences: 24 years for Smith and 20 for Gaines. And both -- like more than <a href="/mwt/feature/2000/10/25/drug_families/index.html">50,000 other mothers</a> in state and federal prisons -- left behind children who were devastated by their absence. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/08/30/clemency_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/30/clemency_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motherless children</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/25/drug_families/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/25/drug_families/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2000/10/25/drug_families</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The drug war has stamped an entire class of parents as permanently unfit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Harris still isn't sure why she did it. </p><p>She had filled her cart with $80 worth of groceries for herself and her 4-year-old son, and was standing in line waiting to pay for them. On impulse, she picked up a Bic lighter and slipped it into her pocket. In a lifetime that had already given her plenty to regret, Harris would come to regret this action more than any she had ever taken. It would trigger a chain of events that, three years later, has left her unlikely ever to see her child again. </p><p>It's worth mentioning that Harris, 39, is not simply a shoplifter; she is also a drug offender, with a lengthy history of using and selling methamphetamine. It's a history she says drew to a close within the last few years when, in fits and starts, she managed to get herself into a rehab program, secure permanent housing, stop using drugs and stabilize her life. </p><p>But Harris didn't do these things quickly or consistently enough; didn't do them on the timetable handed to her by the court that claimed jurisdiction over her son in the wake of her shoplifting arrest. As a result, like a growing number of women caught in the crushing nexus of the criminal justice and child welfare systems, she has seen her parental rights permanently terminated and her child placed for adoption. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/25/drug_families/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/25/drug_families/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swept away</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/20/conspirators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/20/conspirators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2000 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2000/07/20/conspirators</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thousands of women, often guilty of little more than lousy judgment, are serving long prison sentences as drug "conspirators."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natasha Gaines came home recently to find an urgent message from one of her mother's lawyers: President Clinton had just commuted the sentences of four women and one man serving long prison terms for conspiracy under mandatory-sentencing drug laws. It was good news, attorney Tracey Hubbard assured Gaines, whose mother, Dorothy, is serving a 19-year sentence in Tallahassee, Fla., for conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine. If Clinton had been moved by these women's stories, perhaps he would grant Dorothy's application for clemency. Maybe her mom would finally be allowed to come home. </p><p>But Natasha wasn't sure just how hopeful she should feel. Like the four women pardoned by Clinton, her mother -- like tens of thousands of other women -- was sentenced to prison as a drug "conspirator," guilty of little more than having a man in her life who was involved with drugs. Clinton's decision to commute the five sentences received relatively little attention. There was no White House press conference and no press release. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/20/conspirators/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/20/conspirators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;A policeman had to pry me away from him&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/14/prison_dads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/14/prison_dads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2000 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Father's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2000/06/14/prison_dads</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as the law is concerned, once your dad is in prison, he's not your dad anymore.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>S</b>usana recalls touching her father only once, in an embrace that ended with police intervention. In 15 years, her father has never been able to feed her, support her or protect her. Yet Susana's father is the most important person in her life, the one person she knows loves her -- the only real parent she has. </p><p>Susana's dad is an inmate at San Quentin State Prison, serving 21 years to life under California's rigid "three strikes" sentencing law. Caught four years ago with stolen property -- and not for the first time -- he's been determined by the court to be of no further value outside of prison. Unfortunately, he is of vital importance to Susana (not her real name). </p><p>There are more than 1.5 million men incarcerated in the United States today. The majority of them are fathers. It's a role that may not have been central to their lives before they were arrested -- most did not live with their children, nor with the mothers of those children. Certainly their status as fathers is barely recognized by prison administrators or advocacy groups. Of the limited number of programs that aim to sustain family bonds during incarceration, the great majority are aimed at female prisoners. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/14/prison_dads/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/14/prison_dads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the jailhouse is far from home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/29/jailed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/29/jailed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2000/03/29/jailed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kids with parents behind bars share the pain of incarceration.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>L</b>ast Thursday, a sixth-grader in Ohio brought a handgun to school and held his classmates hostage. He didn't shoot anybody. It wasn't his plan. After a teacher intervened and gave him a hug, he revealed his true purpose. He pulled a gun because he wanted to go to jail to be with his mother, who is serving time for a drug-related probation violation. That day, she was scheduled to be transferred from a local jail to the Ohio Reformatory for Women in Marysville, 150 miles away from her son.</p><p>There are 1.5 million children in this country who have lost a parent to jail or prison. The incarceration fever that caught hold in the 1980s and has yet to break (the United States held a record 2 million people behind bars at last count) has left a generation of children in limbo. Many will spend their childhood in foster homes, with aging grandparents or with other relatives or friends. Often -- very often -- they bounce from one short-term caretaker to another.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/29/jailed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/29/jailed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Torn to pieces</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/16/siblings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/16/siblings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adoption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2000/02/16/siblings</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brothers and sisters in foster care, rarely adopted together, are routinely split and scattered, never to see each other again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>C</b>hristine (not her real name) remembers the day she lost her little brother.</p><p>She was 7 and he was 4. They had grown up close. Their mother was an alcoholic and a drug user, their father bedridden with emphysema, so they spent most of their time together, running around the apartment complex where they lived, Christine taking care, leading the way.</p><p>"My mom didn't know how to take care of us," Christine, now 22, recalls. "He attached himself to me because I showed him that I cared about him.</p><p>"He looked up to me and we always used to do things together. He would follow me around and go places with me, and I'd be watching him. I would always buy him toys and candy and tell him that I loved him. I remember playing with him all the time."</p><p>That day Christine was at a neighbor's apartment. She saw a police car drive by, and the next thing she knew, her mother was being arrested and Christine was being driven away in a separate car.</p><p>"I was so small," says Christine. "I just thought, OK, my mother's getting arrested. She's gonna come back and I'll probably live with my aunt and uncle until my mother gets well.</p><p>"But I never did come back."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/16/siblings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/16/siblings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shopping online &#8212; for children</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/22/internet_adoption/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/22/internet_adoption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/1999/09/22/internet_adoption</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For children who have waited years for a family to adopt them, the Internet may be the last hope.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>S</b>ix-year-old Dustin stares out from the computer screen and offers<br />
a "say cheese" smile. Dustin, a caption tells us, enjoys "playing soccer, riding bikes and watching cartoons."  He's also been known to "hit, bite, kick and grab," but with "appropriate services" is expected to outgrow these behaviors. Dustin is looking for a family. Specifically, he is looking for a "two-parent home and would do best in a home with no other children."</p><p>The little boy's bio reads like a personals ad but functions more like the prelude to an arranged marriage, since Dustin himself was not involved in its composition.  Dustin is one of 1,400 foster children currently listed online in <a target="new" href="http://www.adopt.org">FACES of Adoption,</a> a database maintained by the National Adoption Center (NAC) in Philadelphia and  Children Awaiting Parents in Rochester, N.Y.  Thirty-seven states run their own "photolisting" sites as well, and the federal government will soon be taking bids for a comprehensive national site. The Clinton administration<br />
has pledged to double the number of adoptions out of foster care by 2002 and<br />
has proclaimed the Internet central to its strategy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/09/22/internet_adoption/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/22/internet_adoption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is welfare reform sending more kids to foster care?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/01/welfare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/01/welfare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 1999 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/09/01/welfare</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the success stories, more families at the bottom are falling apart.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n 1994 <a href="/news/feature/1999/08/12/gingrich/index.html">Newt Gingrich</a> sparked a short-lived tempest by suggesting that welfare payments be cut off and the money used instead to ship the children of the poor off to orphanages.</p><p>Officially, Newt's vision never even made it to the drawing board. But as the two-year limits imposed by welfare reform begin to kick in, throwing a number of already struggling families deeper into poverty, a troubling possibility arises: Some families who lose their welfare benefits may also lose their children.</p><p>While it is too early to measure definitively, there are some unsettling early signs. In Wisconsin -- which embarked on welfare reform early and avidly -- 5 percent of former welfare recipients, or one in 20, reported being forced to abandon their children. In San Diego County, foster care placements doubled after the new welfare law took effect. When researchers interviewed San Diego families who had become homeless after losing their benefits, 18 percent said their children subsequently went into foster care.</p><p>Nationwide, the number of children in foster care is rising, even in a period of overall economic prosperity -- to 520,000 at last count, 20,000 more than a year before.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/09/01/welfare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/01/welfare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An affair to remember</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1998/07/30/featurea_16/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1998/07/30/featurea_16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 1998 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/1998/07/30/featurea</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about Monica? President Clinton is trying desperately to salvage his reputation. She has lost hers forever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>H</b>ere's a new one for you: the guy who ruined a girl's reputation by telling everyone they didn't have sex.</p><p>Monday night President Clinton copped to a lie that is the reverse of the standard one. As a rule, the guy says he did something with the girl or she did something to him that, in fact, she did not do. He does this to enhance his reputation at the expense of hers. But now the biggest man on campus has admitted that for the last seven months he had flipped the script: "Let's do it and say we didn't."</p><p>Either way, the lesson is the same: Sex between a man and a woman may take two in private, but once it gets into the public arena, he's the one who gets to define it -- and to define her. Should this lead to a scandal, the first thing to go is her "credibility," her right to be the one who says what happened, what it meant. "I never had sex with <i>that woman.</i>" There was even speculation that she had imagined the whole thing; reporters dug up childhood friends and high school yearbooks in an effort to assess her sanity.</p><p>Knowing this, who could begrudge Monica her unwashed dress, both souvenir and proof? Or her scanning TV screens for the blue and gold tie, a signal that it did mean something? It's all she's got now, besides a reputation that will dog her all her days.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1998/07/30/featurea_16/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1998/07/30/featurea_16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>bad girl</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1997/10/22/cov_22juvenile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1997/10/22/cov_22juvenile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 1997 09:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/1997/10/22/cov_22juvenile</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A teenager struggles to stay human in the clutches of a system that despises her.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he phone rings late, after 10.</p><p>"Is it OK to call at this hour?" asks a young, female voice I've never heard before.   It's a counselor from the group home where L. has<br />
been for the past two weeks.  She's calling to let me know that L. is<br />
"AWOL," the term used by group home staff to describe a resident who<br />
leaves without permission.</p><p>I've known L. for two years, since she was 14, when she wandered<br />
into the youth newspaper I edit and sat down at a computer.  Abandoned by<br />
her mother, L. had lived with her great-grandmother until she was 11, when<br />
the state took charge of her<br />
care.  After more than 20 foster and group-home placements in three years,<br />
L. had, by the time I met her, decided she was better off on her own, and<br />
was staying with one friend after another -- part of the uncounted, indoor<br />
homeless.   When an argument with her stepfather -- back in town briefly<br />
along with her mother -- turned violent, L. found herself swept back into the<br />
system, sent to juvenile hall and then to this group home.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1997/10/22/cov_22juvenile/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1997/10/22/cov_22juvenile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>little monsters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1997/08/06/187970806/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1997/08/06/187970806/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 1997 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/1997/08/06/187970806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The scariest aliens on the screen this summer are our teenage children.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1" color="#006699">I</font>t's a little awkward, isn't it?  Even as tough-on-crime types are<br />
trying to gather support for federal legislation that gives states special<br />
cash prizes for throwing away the key on juvenile offenders, juvenile crime<br />
rates continue to drop. But these promising statistics aren't enough to slow the powerful<br />
cultural momentum toward creating a new class of untouchables:  our<br />
children.  I'm not talking about "negative stereotypes" -- we've been<br />
portraying teenagers as dumb brutes ever since John Hughes passed the torch<br />
to Larry Clark.  The morality tale currently in vogue is a warning to<br />
adults who might still harbor illusions about "reaching" these wayward<br />
youth:  Don't get too close.  If they don't slit your throat, they'll steal<br />
your soul, and turn you into one of them.</p><p>The new film "187" -- about a dedicated high school science teacher<br />
pushed over the edge by the unrelenting viciousness of his students -- warns<br />
not so much of individual youthful villains (although it has its share of<br />
those) as of a looming, inchoate mass of adolescent evil.  Again and again,<br />
the camera hovers over teeming masses of faceless, hooded teens, utterly<br />
indistinguishable as they lumber menacingly towards us.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1997/08/06/187970806/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1997/08/06/187970806/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Little Monsters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1997/08/06/187/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1997/08/06/187/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 1997 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/1997/08/06/187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Youth advisor Nell Bernstein reviews the movie &#039;I87&#039; starring Samuel L. Jackson and decides that the scariest aliens on the screen this summer are our teenage children.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1" color="#006699">I</font>t's a little awkward, isn't it?  Even as tough-on-crime types are<br />
trying to gather support for federal legislation that gives states special<br />
cash prizes for throwing away the key on juvenile offenders, juvenile crime<br />
rates continue to drop.</p><p>But these promising statistics aren't enough to slow the powerful<br />
cultural momentum toward creating a new class of untouchables:  our<br />
children.  I'm not talking about "negative stereotypes" -- we've been<br />
portraying teenagers as dumb brutes ever since John Hughes passed the torch<br />
to Larry Clark.  The morality tale currently in vogue is a warning to<br />
adults who might still harbor illusions about "reaching" these wayward<br />
youth:  Don't get too close.  If they don't slit your throat, they'll steal<br />
your soul, and turn you into one of them.</p><p>The new film "187" -- about a dedicated high school science teacher<br />
pushed over the edge by the unrelenting viciousness of his students -- warns<br />
not so much of individual youthful villains (although it has its share of<br />
those) as of a looming, inchoate mass of adolescent evil.  Again and again,<br />
the camera hovers over teeming masses of faceless, hooded teens, utterly<br />
indistinguishable as they lumber menacingly towards us.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1997/08/06/187/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1997/08/06/187/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 Ball Chicks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1997/01/31/sneakpeeks_69/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1997/01/31/sneakpeeks_69/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1997 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/1997/01/31/sneakpeeks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nell Bernstein reviews "8 Ball Chicks: A Year in the Violent World of Girl Gangsters" by Gini Sikes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1" color="#000000"><b>T</b></font>he book jacket is scary, garish purple. A bloated, ratty-haired girl squints evilly and points her gun, Uncle Sam-style, right at <i>you</i>. Fortunately, "8 Ball Chicks," journalist Gini Sikes' look at female gang members in three U.S. cities, doesn't deliver on its cover's tabloid promise.  Sikes' subjects are sometimes frightening, but she isn't trying to scare us.  Her girl gangsters are more victims than perps, trapped by their own violence, desperately fighting against disappearing entirely.</p><p>Subtitled "A Year in the Violent World of Girl Gangsters," "8 Ball Chicks" falls within the booming genre of the inner-city travelogue:  rental-car journeys into and out of American ghettos.  The format has some intrinsic problems -- do we really believe that poor Americans inhabit an entirely separate "world"? -- but, at its best, lets us hear voices excluded from most mainstream accounts of urban life.  And with violent crime rates multiplying for adolescent females even as they fall for males, Sikes has picked an important topic at the right moment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1997/01/31/sneakpeeks_69/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1997/01/31/sneakpeeks_69/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

