<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Rebecca Clarren</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/rebecca_clarren/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The EPA&#8217;s Stalin era</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/11/epa_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/11/epa_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/environment/feature/2008/11/11/epa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It's absolutely shocking what's going on," say insiders. Secretive changes have diluted science and jeopardized public health. Will Obama overcome Bush's toxic legacy?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may sound like just another Erin Brockovich-style tear-jerker. Enter stage right: Poor people exposed to toxic chemicals who worry that the government is ignoring their plight.</p><p>But the story of the hundreds of sick people who live near the former Kelly Air Force Base illuminates an entirely new manner in which the Bush administration has diluted science and put public health at risk. This year, largely in obeisance to the Pentagon, the nation's biggest polluter, the White House diminished a little-known but critical process at the Environmental Protection Agency for assessing toxic chemicals that impacts thousands of Americans.</p><p>As a coalition of more than 40 national and local environmental organizations put it in <a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&amp;FileStore_id=d26077a1-5d21-4b73-a808-03539ca90447">a letter</a> to EPA administrators this past April: "EPA, under pressure from the Bush White House, has given the foxes the keys to the environmental protection henhouse."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/11/11/epa_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/11/epa_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should biotech piggy go to market?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/04/animal_cloning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/04/animal_cloning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Beasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/03/04/animal_cloning</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumer advocates worry that the FDA is throwing open the barn door to genetically engineered animals too quickly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behind locked doors, past a shower, where humans are required to rinse, more than 25 pink pigs crowd into hay-covered pens at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada. They look like regular Yorkshire pigs: Their eyes gleam like black marbles, they snort, and they scarf dinner from a trough. "These pigs behave like pigs; they do everything a pig would do," says John Kelley of <a href="http://www.marslanding.ca/">Mars Landing</a>, a Canadian agricultural development program. Except for one thing. </p><p>These pigs have been modified to carry a gene from an innocuous strain of E. coli that has been spliced with a protein from a mouse. This doesn't give the pigs a newfound affinity for cheese. Rather, the added gene enables the animals to produce the enzyme phytase in their saliva. This enzyme, say Guelph researchers, could solve one of the major environmental problems associated with industrial pig farms. </p><p>Normal pigs can't break down phytate, a phosphorus-rich compound in their gut. When manure lagoons on hog factories overflow or breach into nearby rivers or seep into groundwater, the high phosphorus content creates algae blooms, killing fish and other marine life. Trademarked the <a href="http://www.uoguelph.ca/enviropig/">Enviropig</a>, these genetically modified pigs produce 60 percent less phosphorus in their manure than their conventional cousins. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/04/animal_cloning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/04/animal_cloning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Put a stake in it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/vampire_energy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/vampire_energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//good_life/2008/01/24/vampire_energy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cut up to 10 percent of your electric bill simply by turning off "vampire" appliances that run all night.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are insomniacs in our homes that work late at night and run up the electricity bill. They are not the classically overworked American who pops melatonin or Tylenol PM. They are microwave ovens, computers and TVs. They are half of our appliances, electronic equipment and associated chargers that suck down power even when they're turned off, in sleep or standby mode. A typical house hosts around 50 such insomniacs, and though individual devices use minuscule amounts of electricity, in the aggregate they're an astonishing and pricey burden. </p><p>This "vampire energy loss" represents between 5 and 8 percent of a single family home's total electricity use per year, according to the <a href=http://www.energy.gov/index.htm>Department of Energy.</a> On average, that's the equivalent of one month's electricity bill. Taken across the United States, this adds up to at least 68 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity annually; that's the equivalent output of 37 typical electricity-generating power plants, costing consumers more than $7 billion. This wasted energy sends more than 97 billion pounds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere; on a global scale, standby energy accounts for 1 percent of the world's carbon emissions, according to Alan Meier of the <a href="http://www.lbl.gov/">Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,</a> based in California. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/vampire_energy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/vampire_energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not-so-green jeans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/07/organic_jeans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/07/organic_jeans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//good_life/2008/01/07/organic_jeans</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Organic cotton is a leap ahead for the garment industry -- not so the toxic dyes and finishing agents used in trendy eco-jeans.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any other article of clothing, bluejeans connect us to the storied myth of America. Created for ranchers and loggers in the 19th century, bluejeans still symbolize hard work and freedom, even if we don't wear them for anything that resembles physical labor. Popularized by icons like James Dean and Bruce Springsteen, jean styles, from bell-bottomed to acid-washed, reflect the zeitgeist of our times. Today, there's a new jean in town -- organic. </p><p>Just over a year ago, Levi Strauss &amp; Co., the top jeans retailer in America, launched Eco jeans, made with 100 percent organic cotton, in a variety of styles. Jeans in the company's Red Tab line sell for $68 (only about $20 more than typical Red Tabs), aiming to fulfill a mission to "democratize organic," according to E.J. Bernacki of Levi's. Gap is considering its own line of organic jeans, and Patagonia and a number of high-end fashionista brands, such as James Jeans, Del Forte and Seven, also make jeans from organic cotton. Levi's, for its part, explains that the move to organic was a simple response to consumer demand. Retail sales of organic cotton increased 238 percent between 2005 and 2007, and sales are expected to reach more than $2 billion by the end of this year, according to Organic Exchange, a nonprofit trade association. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/07/organic_jeans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/07/organic_jeans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go green this holiday season</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/10/holiday_gifts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/10/holiday_gifts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//good_life/2007/12/10/holiday_gifts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing kid swings, handbags, local food deliveries and more -- all organic or handcrafted from recycled materials.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know people who love to complain the holidays are no more than a display of idol worship at the altar of consumerism. Yet most of us like to give gifts -- it's the giving that fills us with love and cheer. And I bet even the grinches among your family and friends won't mind a thoughtful present made in the U.S. from recycled goods or sustainable materials. Here's an offering of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/environment/">Earth</a>-friendly gifts. </p><p><b>Messenger bags</b> </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.alchemygoods.com/"><img class='wp-image-10078217' src='http://media.salon.com/2007/12/messenger.jpg' /></a><a href="http://www.alchemygoods.com/">Alchemy Goods</a> turns old bike tire tubes and seat belt straps into hip messenger bags. Eli Reich, a former mechanical engineer, started the company in 2003 after his messenger bag was stolen and he noticed a bunch of old bike tubes collecting dust in his apartment. He now collects old tire tubes from bike shops along the West Coast. Waterproof and stylish, his bags come in three sizes. The Messenger ($148) is good for bike commuting or trips to the gym, the Urban ($138), a bit smaller, is better for carrying laptops, and the Haversack ($88) is a good unisex purse, big enough for a book and your lunch, and it has a handy front-zippered pocket for a wallet or iPod. (Memo to my friends and family: I really want one.) Look for a new line of men's wallets ($32), made from recycled billboard banners and, of course, old bike tires. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/12/10/holiday_gifts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/10/holiday_gifts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does organic wine taste bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/01/organic_wine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/01/organic_wine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//good_life/2007/12/01/organic_wine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Figuring out which (if any) organic wine to buy can feel like navigating dawn with a hangover.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since Wal-Mart began stocking organic <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/food_and_travel/">food,</a> it's clear a lot of consumers now believe that produce and milk produced without pesticides or hormones taste just as good as, if not better than, their conventional brethren. Logic would say that this also goes for "organic wine," which I see cropping up more and more often at health food stores and markets. But in this case the label doesn't tell the whole story. </p><p>Wine <a href="http://www.ams.usda.gov/NOP/FactSheets/Backgrounder.html">labeled organic</a> means that at least 95 percent of the grapes used were never sprayed with pesticides or synthetic fertilizers. Such chemical purity is ensured by 40-foot buffer zones from farms that spray specific chemicals, loads of paperwork and on-site visits from third-party certifiers. Organic grapes then go to a certified organic winery that doesn't use chemical cleansers or add any preservatives like sulfur dioxide, an antioxidant that gives wine a significant life span. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/12/01/organic_wine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/01/organic_wine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green investing 101</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/26/green_investing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/26/green_investing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//good_life/2007/11/26/green_investing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that I am ready to start investing, I want to find out if my money can grow in green fields.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My great-grandmother Pearl, a shrewd woman, managed to save 20 percent of every paycheck that her husband Leo, a plumber, brought home each week. The checks, at least in the 1920s, were $5, but by the time they retired, they had saved enough to own a small shopping center. When she died last month at the age of 100, she left behind her recipe for meatballs (lots of ketchup), inspiration for the art of perfect housekeeping, and tens of thousands of dollars for her children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. </p><p>So, for the first time, I've started to think about investing. In search of a firm that could help me invest in companies that aren't raping and pillaging the planet, I found <a href="http://www.trilliuminvest.com/">Trillium Asset Management Corp.</a> One of the oldest socially responsible firms in the country, they directed me toward the $50 million <a href="http://www.greencentury.com">Green Century Balanced Fund,</a> a mutual fund that invests in environmentally responsible companies. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/26/green_investing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/26/green_investing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shopping for a clean washing machine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/19/washing_machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/19/washing_machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//good_life/2007/11/19/washing_machine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should you put your trust in the Energy Star rating when buying a a new appliance?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I do the laundry at my house, the washing machine downstairs clanks and spins with such ferocity it sounds like a helicopter is hovering in my basement. The 1994 Roper model was here when I moved into the house last year, and I'm grateful for the hours it's saved me at the Laundromat. But compared with newer machines, my Roper hemorrhages water and electricity. Besides, I'm not sure it's been doing such a great job of getting my clothes clean. With winter here and my energy bills about to sprint upward, it's time to consider buying a new washer. </p><p>At the nearby Sears, shiny home appliances lined the rows with the promise of a Christmas season full of gleaming towels. Several featured a big blue tag, emblazoned with a star. These are Energy Star-certified machines. "These machines save more than water and power. They save you time because the washer spins quicker," said David, a veteran Sears salesman who, behind earnest glasses and a mustache, rattled off facts and figures. "Everything's good about these as far as the environment goes. They're less of a drain on our natural resources." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/19/washing_machine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/19/washing_machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public bathroom dilemma: Paper or air?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/12/bathroom_dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/12/bathroom_dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//good_life/2007/11/12/bathroom_dilemma</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How we dry our hands has more of an impact than you might imagine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a recent Saturday visit to the local mall, several simultaneously flushing toilets and the piped-in sounds of Kenny G were the soundtrack to my latest environmental dilemma. There I was in the public restroom, my hands dripping from a trip to the sink, momentarily paralyzed by a perennial <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/environment/">environmental</a> quandary: Should I dry my hands with a paper towel or use the air hand dryer? A sign emblazoned on the dryer professed: "Dryers help protect the environment. They save trees from being used for paper towels. They eliminate paper towel waste." But then the dryer also sucks down electricity. What would <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/al_gore/">Al Gore</a> do? </p><p>I realize this may sound ridiculous. What is one or two paper towels or 30 seconds of hot air compared to the emissions belched from cars stacked on I-84? But consider the following: So far this year Americans have used 1.8 million tons of paper towels and tissue, according to the <a href="http://www.afandpa.org/">American Forest & Paper Association,</a> an industry group. There are approximately 3 million hand dryers installed in the country and most run for 30 seconds around 100 times a day, according to World Dryer Corp., one of the country's leading manufacturers. That's 5.7 million kilowatt-hours of electricity used every day -- enough power to run an estimated 197,000 homes a day. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/12/bathroom_dilemma/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/12/bathroom_dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bamboo shoots and trees</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/05/bamboo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/05/bamboo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//good_life/2007/11/05/bamboo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bamboo is a wise alternative to wood products. But there are still a few toxic snakes in the grass.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bamboo has arrived. American consumers have embraced the veritable grass with a passion not seen since the first hippie rolled a joint. In the past five years, bamboo products have become a multibillion-dollar industry. Last year, imports into the U.S. exceeded $2.6 billion, with bamboo flooring alone seeing a 50 percent increase from 2005. Aside from flooring and fencing, bamboo is increasingly used to make everything from surfboards and bike frames to designer clothing. This diverse array of products is united by a singular message: Bamboo is good for the Earth. </p><p>Bamboo has achieved its <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/green_living/">green</a> reputation for sound reasons. As one of the world's fastest growing plants, it grows up to 1 foot per day and can be harvested in an average five years, as opposed to the 40 to 120 years it takes to grow most trees. Regenerated from rhizomes, small stems attached to roots in the ground, bamboo doesn't need to be replanted after being hewn. Such quick growth means it can sequester more carbon from the air than a slower growing species like, say, a rose bush. Furthermore, it's cheap -- or at least, it can be. Costco and Home Depot both sell bamboo flooring for less than $2 a square foot. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/05/bamboo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/05/bamboo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who needs a Prius anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/29/prius/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/29/prius/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//good_life/2007/10/29/prius</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plenty of new fuel-efficient cars pollute less than trendy hybrids, without draining your bank account.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than a cloth grocery bag or a Nalgene bottle, today's accessory for any hotblooded environmentalist is a hybrid car. For anyone who can afford the $22,000 price tag, a Toyota Prius and other hybrids announce to the world that you are someone who cares about melting glaciers and the fate of polar bears. People have always bought cars as a status symbol. Where would the sports car be without the midlife crisis? </p><p>So if you want to pay more than $20,000 to reduce your carbon footprint, brag about your part in reducing dependence on foreign oil, and garner esteem from friends at the natural-foods store, go right ahead. Just don't be too smug. If hybrids are driving a revolution, it's a televised road trip to marketing heaven. </p><p>Hybrids aren't necessarily the most environmentally friendly <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/cars/">car</a> on the market, says Jim Kliesch of <a href=http://greenercars.org/>Greenercars.org.</a> The Web site, sponsored by the <a href="http://www.aceee.org/">American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy,</a> rates cars based on tailpipe emissions, gas usage and factory emissions associated with manufacturing. While the Prius and Honda's former hybrid, the Insight, get reported averages of 40 miles per gallon, they're far from the 60 mpg promised on the sticker for city driving. The disconnect is due to an outdated Environmental Protection Agency calculation for fuel economy estimates that fails to include air conditioning, cold-weather driving and high freeway speeds. In October, the EPA implemented its new calculation method for 2008 models. It now claims the Prius gets 45 mpg on the highway. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/10/29/prius/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/29/prius/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>182</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the secretive plan to gut the Endangered Species Act</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/27/endangered_species_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/27/endangered_species_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/03/27/endangered_species</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed regulatory changes, obtained by Salon, would destroy the "safety net for animals and plants on the brink of extinction," say environmentalists.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.fws.gov/" target="_blank">U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service</a> is maneuvering to fundamentally weaken the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fws.gov/endangered/whatwedo.html">Endangered Species Act,</a> its strategy laid out in an internal 117-page draft proposal obtained by Salon. The proposed changes limit the number of species that can be protected and curtail the acres of wildlife habitat to be preserved. It shifts authority to enforce the act from the federal government to the states, and it dilutes legal barriers that protect habitat from sprawl, logging or mining. </p><p>"The proposed changes fundamentally gut the intent of the Endangered Species Act," says Jan Hasselman, a Seattle attorney with <a href="http://www.earthjustice.org/" target="_blank">Earthjustice,</a> an environmental law firm, who helped Salon interpret the proposal. "This is a no-holds-barred end run around one of America's most popular environmental protections. If these regulations stand up, the act will no longer provide a safety net for animals and plants on the brink of extinction." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/03/27/endangered_species_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/27/endangered_species_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behind the Pillow Angel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/09/pillow_angel_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/09/pillow_angel_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/02/09/pillow_angel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doctors at the Seattle hospital that operated on a disabled girl to keep her from reaching sexual maturity -- the controversial "Ashley Treatment" -- were more troubled by the procedure than has been reported previously.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since the "Ashley Treatment" caused a public sensation last month, the prevailing debate has centered around whether <a href="http://www.seattlechildrens.org/" target="new">Children's Hospital and Medical Center</a> in Seattle, which performed the controversial procedure, acted in the best interest of the mentally impaired child. The fact that the hospital's ethics committee signed off on the treatment, which included removing a 6-year-old girl's breast buds, giving her a hysterectomy, and administering high doses of estrogen to keep her short, has been held up as a backstop to discussion. "It was the consensus of the committee that this did in fact actually have potential to improve her life significantly and there was very little actual harm," Dr. Douglas Diekema told Larry King on <a href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0701/12/lkl.01.html" target="_blank">CNN.</a> Diekema led the ethics panel at the hospital and co-authored a medical journal article on the treatment. When the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/la-na-stunt3jan03,0,3676003.story?page=1&track=mostemailedlink" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a> covered the journal article in January, it sparked a worldwide debate in the media, from an Australian radio show to the New York Times opinion page. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/02/09/pillow_angel_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/09/pillow_angel_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>158</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming clean about &#8220;cruelty free&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/13/crueltyfree/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/13/crueltyfree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2006/12/13/crueltyfree</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The label sounds nice but doesn't guarantee those expensive soaps and lotions were created without being tested on animals.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, I want my soap to do more than keep me clean. I like buying a bar that has oatmeal in it, that's touted as organic and -- even better -- "cruelty free." Until recently I hadn't really considered what that claim meant, but I liked the idea that I was paying for something "crafted with intention," something made without having inflicted cruelty on animals. The products that line the aisles of Wild Oats and Whole Foods in my hometown of Portland, Ore., aren't cheap: a 4-ounce bar of soap recently cost me $4.99 (on sale!). But we buy beauty products to nurture ourselves, and somehow, if the company I'm paying doesn't test its soap on animals, I feel less guilty about spending five dollars for a bar of it. </p><p>I'm not alone: 60 percent of consumers agree that they look for beauty products that have a "cruelty free" label on them, according to a recent online poll conducted by the Benchmarking Group, a national consumer research firm for the beauty industry. Like me, about half of the poll participants assumed that the federal government monitored those products to ensure they weren't tested on animals. Turns out it's an assumption that will get you about as far as believing that the right face cream can change your skin and your entire dating life. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/12/13/crueltyfree/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/13/crueltyfree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtually dead in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/16/americasarmy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/16/americasarmy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2006/09/16/americasarmy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To protest the war in Iraq, a media artist infiltrates the U.S. Army's popular online video game and gets himself shot. While angry gamers, soldiers and even some peace activists call him a nuisance, others say his message hits home.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the online video game <a href="http://www.americasarmy.com/" target="_blank">"America's Army,"</a> a strapping guy in camouflage scrambles on his belly across cracked dirt in a war-torn city that looks like Baghdad. As he peers out from behind a low stone wall, he peels up to his feet and starts running down a hill toward a small square hut. He fires several rounds from his machine gun at another soldier, this one dressed in a black-hooded outfit. Five yellow streaks flash from his gun, and the black-hooded soldier rolls over and slides down a hill. Our guy in camouflage chases him till he sags against a van, shoots him again, and then satisfied that the dust emerging from his back indicates death, moves on. </p><p>Across the top of the screen appears the name of a real American soldier, his age and the date he was killed in Iraq. Last week that name read: "CHARLES A. HANSON JR 22 NOV. 28 2004." </p><p>"America's Army," created by the same designers who produced hit first-person-shooter games like "Redneck Rampage" and "Kingpin," is funded by the U.S. Army (to the tune of nearly $10 million), which is to say American taxpayers. But the name of the American soldier killed in Iraq, which those logged on to the game are forced to see, is certainly not part of the game's design but the handiwork of artist <a href="http://www.unr.edu/art/delappe.html" target="_blank">Joseph DeLappe.</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/09/16/americasarmy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/16/americasarmy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s good for Bill Gates&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/26/visas_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/26/visas_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/05/26/visas</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Microsoft mogul says America needs more foreign engineers and programmers to compete. Critics say it's all about cheap labor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a group, engineers and computer programmers aren't usually given to attending protest marches, which may explain why few high-tech workers have filled the streets to protest the immigration reform legislation currently being debated in Congress. But maybe they should learn to carry cardboard signs. For proposed changes to immigration law could have a severe impact on their industry. </p><p>Thursday the Senate passed legislation that will increase the number of H-1B visas available for engineers and high-tech workers from 65,000 to 115,000, with an option of raising the cap an additional 20 percent every year. </p><p>Proponents of the legislation -- the owners of high-tech companies such as Microsoft and Intel, or the subcontractors who supply such places with workers -- say that because of the dearth of engineering students currently in college, there is a shortage of qualified candidates. </p><p>"The cap on H-1B visas has limited the high-tech industry's ability to attract and retain the best and the brightest workers," says Ginny Terzano, spokeswoman for Microsoft. "It's vital Congress take steps to reform high-skilled immigration policies as soon as possible in order to ensure that the U.S. economy remain competitive." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/26/visas_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/26/visas_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA to citizens: Frack you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/05/fracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/05/fracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/05/05/fracking</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Rockies, a gas-extraction process called "fracking" may be releasing a carcinogenic stew of chemicals. Dozens of people say it has made them seriously ill, but the EPA refuses to investigate -- a failure one of its own engineers calls "irrational and corrupt."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 20 miles of interstate highway between rural Silt and Parachute, Colo., slice a crusty landscape where sagebrush clings to ochre mesas. Nearby, the snakelike silver Colorado River carves a valley floor where poplar trees, naked in the winter cold, cast spindly blue shadows across the snow. There are few exits through this section of Garfield County, where the local population of deer and elk rival the number of ranchers, retirees and others who live here. </p><p>Susan Haire, a former elementary teacher who ranches on a small scale, has lived atop one of the surrounding mesas for nearly a decade. But she says the landscape has been turned against her. When she drives down this stretch of highway, her nose bleeds, her eyes burn, and her head pounds. She's taken to wearing a respirator, even in the car. </p><p>"I feel like an alien, like I don't fit into my own environment. It's frightening," says Haire, 55, tears filling her pale slate eyes as she looks through her living room window out on her back fields. "It's horrifying what's happening here. The changes that have happened in the past 18 months are so dramatic. It's just a nightmare." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/05/fracking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/05/fracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rerouting the bridges to nowhere</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/alaska_bridges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/alaska_bridges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/11/23/alaska_bridges</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Republicans were shamed into "compromise" on $454 million of bacon earmarked for Alaskan bridges -- but the pork just got recanned.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Oh, those poor Alaskan bridges. Following reports by Salon and other media last summer, the state's two proposed <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/08/09/bridges/" target="_blank">bridges to nowhere,</a> which would serve sparsely populated areas for a $454 million federal price tag, have become synonymous with irresponsible pork barrel spending. Indeed, far beyond the remote towns they would connect, they've reached into the territory of political cartoons, late-night talk show monologues, and theatrical speeches on the floor of Congress. A pet project of Alaska Republicans Sen. Ted Stevens and Rep. Don Young, one 200-foot-high, mile-long bridge would connect Ketchikan, population 8,000, with Gravina Island, population 50. The other span, nicknamed "Don Young's Way" would cross an inlet, connecting Anchorage to a rural port. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/alaska_bridges/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/alaska_bridges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The entire community is now a toxic waste dump&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/09/wasteland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/09/wasteland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/09/09/wasteland</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Gulf Coast is drowning in a poisonous stew, people are dying from waterborne bacteria, and federal funds have been drained by years of pro-industry policies. Katrina is one of the worst environmental catastrophes in U.S. history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From 500 feet in the air, Chris Wells, a geographer with the U.S. Geological Survey, looked with dismay on the landscape pounded and then abandoned by Hurricane Katrina. As Wells flew on Wednesday above the Louisiana coastline, across New Orleans, the marshlands south of the city, and over Mississippi, nearly every tree was snapped, their limbs twisted around in a braid, the bark shredded right off the trunk. The marshland below looked as though somebody had taken a spatula and scraped away the marsh grasses, leaving a sea of mud. Aside from a number of shorebirds, and one 8-foot alligator swimming about 20 miles offshore, Wells saw no wildlife. What he did see were streaks of oil, some miles long and 200 yards wide. </p><p>"It was on any body of water of any significance," he says. Hundreds of thousands of inland acres are covered with a spotty sheen of oil. "The landscape right now is absolutely bizarre and unreal," Wells says, from his home in Lafayette, La. "It's emotionally draining. Even if nobody was hurt, it's heartbreaking to see what has happened to the environment." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/09/09/wasteland/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/09/wasteland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A bridge to nowhere</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/08/09/bridges_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/08/09/bridges_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/08/09/bridges</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alaska's Gravina Island (population less than 50) will soon be connected to the megalopolis of Ketchikan (pop. 8,000) by a bridge nearly as long as the Golden Gate and higher than the Brooklyn Bridge.  Alaska residents can thank Rep. Don Young, who just brought home $941 million worth of bacon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A mess of thorny devil's club and salmonberries, along with an old chicken coop, surrounds the 40-year-old cabin where Mike Sallee grew up and still lives part time on southeast Alaska's Gravina Island. Sallee's cabin is the very definition of remote. Deer routinely visit his front porch, and black bears and wolves live in the woods out back. The 20-mile-long island, home to fewer than 50 people, has no stores, no restaurants and no paved roads. An airport on the island hosts fewer than 10 commercial flights a day. </p><p>"I can take off from the homestead and walk the beach for several miles before I get to any other habitation," says Sallee, a fisherman who also operates a small lumber mill. "There's two main mountain ranges on the island and a big valley of forest and muskeg." </p><p>Yet due to funds in a new transportation bill, which President Bush is scheduled to sign Wednesday, Sallee and his neighbors may soon receive a bridge nearly as long as the Golden Gate Bridge and 80 feet taller than the Brooklyn Bridge. With a $223 million check from the federal government, the bridge will connect Gravina to the bustling Alaskan metropolis of Ketchikan, pop. 8,000. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/08/09/bridges_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/08/09/bridges_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

