Rennie Sparks

Uncertain, unfair and bloodthirsty

Mystic and record collector Harry Smith knew life was cruel, yet his folk "Anthology" promised a way to "see America changed by music."

  • more
    • All Share Services

Various Artists, edited by Harry Smith
“Anthology of American Folk Music, Vol. 4″
Revenant

Andy Battaglia: Digging into Harry Smith’s “Anthology of American Folk Music” means grappling with the shadowy realms of alchemy and black magic. If mindful folk music collided with mindless rock ‘n’ roll to form a sort of perfect storm in the ’60s, then Smith was without a doubt the mystic rainmaker. When his original three-volume “Anthology” was released in 1952 it gave the folk scene a swift kick in the jeans by exposing strumming idealists to what Greil Marcus called the “old, weird America.” From the collection of rural shakedowns, murder ballads and possessed hymns of the ’20s and ’30s came Bob Dylan, who tired of folk’s insularity and traveled rockward to move the people, change the world, etc.

Back then, Smith said that there would be forthcoming volumes of the “Anthology.” He never made good on his promise during his lifetime, but thanks to the active Harry Smith Archives and folk hero John Fahey’s Revenant label, we now get to hear the songs he picked for “Volume 4.” The meat of the new volume is similar to the first three — old scratchy recordings pulled from 78s released between 1928 and 1940. But this volume also comes at an interesting time, following the Smithsonian Folkways CD reissue of the original set two years ago. Judging by the ’90s swell of alt-country, or Moby sampling field hollers on “Play,” or indie rockers discussing favorite Appalachian banjo players, the fallout after an explosion that happened 50 years ago has left some hot spots even today.

At the same time, listening to “Memphis Shakedown,” which opens “Volume 4,” it’s hard to figure out why music ever evolved beyond jug bands. The sound of some guy blowing and humming into an empty jug backed by a bunch of guys in a hillbilly-boogie group may say just about all anyone needs to know about music’s ability to move the soul. Of course, music has changed a bit since the song was recorded in 1934. And though I’m (sort of) kidding about the jug band thing, it’s hard to conceive of that history without the songs Smith handpicked to “see America changed by music.”

Rennie Sparks: The thing about the original “Anthology” that stunned ’50s folkies and ’90s alt-hipsters alike was its ability to transport us into a distant and seemingly unobtainable past, and to show us how little things have changed since then. What a comfort it was to listen to morbid songs like “Ommie Wise” by G.B. Grayson or “Fatal Flower Garden” by Nelstone’s Hawaiians and see that life has always been uncertain, unfair and bloodthirsty. The recordings themselves were not all that ancient (most were from the ’20s and ’30s), but many of them were modern American mutations of ancient European hymns and ballads. The “Anthology” revealed a path of music leading back through time and across the world. It was this heartfelt connection to the distant past and the not-so-distant past that caused many people, myself included, to talk about before and after when speaking of the original “Anthology.” Listening to it felt like waking up from a long sleep. It reminded me that music could be so much more than just background for a barn-dance reel or barroom brawl — that music could teach, console and mourn the unchanging tragedy that we are all born to die.

So I don’t think I’m alone in admitting that my hands shook when I heard there was a fourth volume. But sadly, I found no new revelations in this latest release. Of course it’s a fine record. Smith, collector of found paper airplanes and arcane Native American dances, who once asked Sara Carter how her quilt patterns connected to the songs she sang, was always meticulous and visionary to the extreme. But this fourth anthology is far too familiar to my ears. Household names like the Carter Family, Leadbelly and Robert Johnson are here and more than once are represented by songs I’ve already heard elsewhere. Here are Black Jack David, John Henry and that old 9-pound hammer as well. Even the Carter Family’s “No Depression in Heaven,” which, via Uncle Tupelo, gave name to an entire musical movement, is included — certainly no hidden treasure anymore.

Beyond ringers like the Carters, the Monroe Brothers and Blue Sky Boys, there is the quiet rage of Bukka White’s “Parchman Farm Blues” and the nihilistic spiritualism of the Heavenly Gospel Singers’ “Mean Old World.” But ever since the first “Anthology” showed me how Ice Cube and Nick Cave connect to “Stackalee” and “The Butcher Boy,” it takes far more than another jug band to make my heart skip a beat.

Battaglia: I agree that expecting infinite rewards from a finite history is problematic. So did Smith, who told interviewer John Cohen that he didn’t “think people should spend too much time fiddling with old records — it’s better to switch on the radio.” But that said, it’s interesting how these songs bend and fold according to Smith’s designs. Standing on its own, Blue Sky Boys’ “Down on the Banks of the Ohio” is a creepy, cold story about a man murdering a girl because she refused to marry him. “I drew my knife across her throat, and to my breast she gently pressed,” he sings. Then he mocks her response: “Oh please oh please, don’t murder me, for I’m unprepared to die, you see.” His voice sounds completely devoid of emotion. But after listening to the next song, the Arthur Smith Trio’s shattering “Adieu, False Heart,” I heard a distant sense of regret in the Blue Sky Boys that seemed to be missing the first time. The two songs are beautiful in their own right, but the way Smith leaned them against each other makes them resonate all the more. And I think the fact that we continue to be fascinated with all these artists owes a good bit to the endlessly navigable maps Smith drew so purposefully. After all, who was Smith if not a proto-DJ dropping a dope-ass mix collection?

Sparks: I may be the last one on earth who thinks songwriters should be paid more than DJs, but I can’t help wishing there were more “songs” on this record, more material that gleams on its own merits without the help of evocative segues. The most puzzling and fresh song to my ears is “Dog and Gun (An Old English Ballad)” by Bradley Kincaid, in which a lady spying a cute farmer takes merrily after him with her dog and gun. Contrary to standard folk form, she isn’t tossed in the river or buried alive; she happily weds the handsome hunk. Ultimately, though, if you know that a washboard doesn’t have to be used to scrub socks you might pass on this record. A top-shelf folk collection it ain’t, but it is certainly a fine starter set. Smith himself agreed; he told Cohen he felt that “great social changes would result from” the original “Anthology.” But of the fourth and further installments, he said, “The real reason that it didn’t come out was that I didn’t have sufficient interest in it.” Smith’s job was done, with the folk revival in full swing. He moved on to hand-painting greeting cards with occult symbols and collecting Seminole Indian tapestry.

Which brings me to the real reason to have a look at this “Anthology” — the accompanying essays, especially the reminiscences by the Fugs’ Ed Sanders and John Cohen of the New Lost City Ramblers, who both knew Smith personally and who beautifully conjure up Smith the obsessive-compulsive, the beatnik, the necromancer. Read how a fifth-grade Smith attempted to create his own written language to record the dance steps of Swinomish Indians, how he later meditated in a covered bathtub and took peyote within sight of Sara Carter’s driveway, how he obsessively collected hand-painted Ukrainian Easter eggs and spent several hundred hours recording ambient sounds of Manhattan, even how he was surrounded by hacking coughs in a homeless shelter he was forced to briefly call home. Too bad, though, that he never wrote his own liner notes to “Volume 4.” They surely would have been wonderful and wise in ways that only a cabalistic, wino folkie like Smith could muster.

Battaglia: Smith was a real metaphysician, no doubt. And it’s fascinating how all his different obsessions and collecting habits worked together. The quilts, eggs, paper airplanes and records were all just singular words in a hidden language that he translated into elusive but intuitively clear terms. I’m thinking of this after trying in vain to type out the lyrics to Leadbelly’s “Packin’ Trunk.” Most of it is a mess of slobbered words, but I don’t think anybody has to strain too hard to feel what he’s singing about. The same goes for Smith’s own aims. The “Anthology” was created as a near-scientific experiment to exact change through alchemy and Enochian magic. Now, I’m not exactly boned up on obscure 16th century mystical texts, but I still can’t help feeling Smith’s magic fingers at work when I listen to this stuff. There are two great articles about Smith in British music magazine the Wire this month, and I can’t think of a better way to articulate this than a line written by Philip Smith: “It continues to elude empirical study, being above all an experiential science.” He was writing about the cabala, but the same goes for Smith and his “Anthology” — and come to think of it, music too.

Sparks: Yes! Yes! And Smith was probably one of the first people to see folk music as worthy of serious study, to see that folk could be as complicated and chaotic as jazz (kudos again to the Memphis Jug Band!) or as rigid and ritualistic as a Native American rain dance. (Listen to a few murder ballads and you’ll see that in “Banks of the Ohio” the girl must say “I’m unprepared to die” before any throat-slitting can begin.) What frustrates me is that folk, like country, has in recent years become somewhat of a dirty word. Many people still think of folk as a music with a very obvious agenda, i.e., political protest, singalongs for kids, etc. But “Rock-a-Bye Baby” has always been about a baby falling out of a tree — even if somewhere along the way a lot of people stopped listening to the words. Harry Smith never did.

Immigrant Sons

Sharps & Flats is a daily music review in Salon Magazine

  • more
    • All Share Services

I was speeding along a snowy freeway recently when “Someone Saved My Life Tonight” came on the radio and I had to pull over to wipe away the tears. That song, like most of Elton John’s, owes its lyrics to Bernie Taupin, but John cries out each line as if he’s reading them from the pages of his own tear-stained diary.

John and Taupin have had a strange magic together for almost 30 years now, through hit after hit, including the recent popular vote for “Candle in the Wind” as requiem for a fallen princess even before Taupin rewrote the lyrics. Though I didn’t find “Candle in the Wind” (which includes the line “Marilyn was found in the nude”) or piles of stuffed animals appropriate grieving for dead royalty, I still can’t resist singing along with the John/Taupin hits sprinkled throughout oldies radio playlists. I’ve always wondered why Taupin remained in John’s shadow — faithful lapdog scribbling out funeral poems at the 11th hour. Taupin’s new CD with his side project, the Farmdogs, does much to answer this question.

It’s not so much that the Farmdogs are without talent, but that their songs seem forced. Taupin may actually be trying too hard, stretching his writer’s muscle until it snaps. There’s the bad love song (“I’ve been cheated like a snake out of his skin”), the party song (“When there’s whiskey in the bathtub, the cruel become kind”), the running-from-the-law song (“Who’s the bastard coulda done this to his wife and kids?”), even the field-hand song (“pesticides sting my eyes/burn my callused hands”). In the end, I believe none of it. From migrant Mexican worker (Taupin actually sings in Spanish) to swaggering tough (“gotta walk in Harlem/learned to bite my tongue”), it all comes off more like writing exercises than heartfelt expression. But the writing here is really no worse than what Taupin’s done for Elton John — it’s just missing John’s convincing voice, his engaging sense of melody, his inventive arrangements.

The Farmdogs’ sound is rootsy and all-too-familiar. Acoustic guitars strum appropriately under twangy solos while banjo and Dobro make guest appearances exactly where expected. Taupin’s weak vocals strive for a honky-blues delivery but end up wavering between pinched sharp and falling flat. After the third or fourth predictable drum fill, the fifth or sixth tambourine stinger and the endlessly repeated choruses that create not a second of real drama, the end result hangs somewhere in the gray mist far below the Traveling Wilburys. The music isn’t so much bad as it is uninspired, unoriginal.

I could forgive all if only the lyrics transported. Leonard Cohen songs sometimes drone on like an old refrigerator, but lines like “As a falling leaf may rest/A moment on the air/So your head upon my breast/So my hand in your hair” make me dizzy. Taupin’s hackneyed images never approach such sensual elegance.

“Bird of Prey” is the only song Taupin offers that rings emotionally true. But, jeez, what’s he getting at here? “How can you sleep at night,” he sings, none-too-subtly alluding to John Lennon’s “How Do You Sleep,” in which the ex-Beatle lashed out at Paul McCartney. But while Lennon’s crybaby rant soars with serious ’70s funk, Taupin’s drip-drops along like the rest of the album — mid-tempo, unassuming. Maybe the song’s about Elton John, maybe not. Either way, Bernie, don’t quit your day job.

Continue Reading Close

Rolling Stones- Live at Soldier Field

  • more
    • All Share Services

At the kickoff for the Rolling Stones’ long-awaited U.S. tour, Mick Jagger wiggled like a sperm cell and gesticulated like a traffic cop steering a five-way intersection at rush hour. He hip-shuffled his way back and forth across an enormous stage decorated like some ancient Babylonian whorehouse, whipping the 54,000 Stones fans gathered at Soldier Field in
Chicago into a grade-A rock ‘n’ roll frenzy. Underneath the fireworks and
the puffs of dry ice, between the blaring horn section and the buttery
swell of backup singers, there were undeniable moments when the Stones
broke through as themselves, soaring sloppy as a flopping fish, rattling
loose as ball bearings in a glass jar, playing raw and simple rock ‘n roll.

The pre-show hype was as incessant and inescapable as an ad
campaign for a new triple-layer burrito at Taco Bell. DJ’s prattled on,
promising front row seats for the five thousandth caller and there were
endless newspaper articles touting Mick’s pre-show workout regimen, the
band’s roots in Chicago Blues and their new “genius” collaboration with
the Dust Brothers. Then the Stones sightings began: a secret show at a
local club sent fans scurrying to their cars; rumors of a sound check at
Soldier Field had boats circling Lake Michigan along the shores near the
arena. Stones Web sites began to download slower and slower as fans
surfed into the wee hours trying to guess where the Stones might pop up
next — sitting in at a local blues club or sweater shopping at Henri Bendel?

Nobody seemed to care if the new CD was any good. The Stones were in town! The Stones! Even the mayor cashed in on the hype with a news brief reassuring the public that
hazardous, fire-propelling propane tanks had been nixed from the show.
Local news teased us with footage of Jagger stepping out of limos all over
town. “Up next, another drive-by shooting and (tasteful pause) find out why
the Stones can’t get no satisfaction with city officials.” Channel 7′s
jovial weatherman, standing in front of his five-day
forecast, proclaimed, “Hey you, get offa my cloud. It looks like clear
skies for the Stones!”

By show day, I was so queasy with Stones hype I felt like I’d
eaten a three-pound bag of mini-Snickers bars. But the crowd pouring into
Soldier Field was anything but jaded. The parking lot was a sea of
screaming fans: “The greatest band on earth!” “Yeah, Stones rock!”

Still, we were a long way from Altamont. Long-haired freaks and
bikers were the clear minority. We could have been queuing up for a Bears
game or a Wisconsin craft show. Forty-something couples milled about in
football sweatshirts buying nachos and light beer. Vendors hawked roses and
Subway sandwiches. Even the women’s bathroom line felt more like Marshall Fields than
a rock show. Middle-aged women sporting Farrah flips whispered, “Pardon me”
as they squeezed through to the stalls. One woman in neatly-faded jeans and
rose lipstick addressed the line, “Does anyone have any … feminine
protection?” In unison, the ladies fumbled for their purses.

The show’s start was electric. With a giant explosion, the
band roared into “Satisfaction.” Keith Richards came stumbling out in
sunglasses and a long leopard-print coat. Ron Wood followed in bright red, and
finally Jagger came strutting down a staircase in his standard clown/ TV
pimp stage garb — black tux and blue scarf with gold fringe fluttering in the
wind. The video screen exploded with fast cuts — Keith’s skull ring as his
fingers flayed into power chords, Mick’s leathery face glistening with
sweat, Charlie Watts stony and dignified, looking très Urban Outfitters in
a collarless zip-up jacket, holding his drumsticks like a 19th century country gentleman loosely grasping the reins of his horse and buggy.

The band tore through the first half hour with a stream of
dependable hits. The crowd roared along to familiar choruses: “Let’s spend
the night together … It’s only rock ‘n’ roll but I like it, like it, yes I
do!”

Jagger marched across the vast stage with wild thrusting hips and
flailing arms, his lips and chin jutting huge across the video monitor. He tore
off coats and pulled on hats, stripping off his tuxedo jacket to a bright
yellow overshirt then down to a blue rhinestone muscle shirt then whipping
on black leather jackets, a red velvet long coat, a pullover sweater, a
silver windbreaker and sundry scarves.

Richards played the rock ‘n’ roll fool. He strutted center stage for
his sloppy, three-note solos, face pained and puzzled as his fingers bent
strings. He wandered back and forth between Ron Wood and bassist Darryl
Jones, facing them while he played as if begging help in figuring out the chords.

Wood kept to the side stage, trying to keep out of Jagger’s way as
he frantically whirled like 100 Stevie Nickses, playing the almighty
rock dervish — somewhere between a drag queen kick boxer and a first-grade
music teacher, wildly hand-clapping to entice the crowd into singing along.
Watts remained expressionless, refusing to crack a grin even when the video
monitor splashed him in close-up.

The Stones definitely had their moments. There was the gritty “Honky
Tonk Women,” roaring with Richards’ off-kilter guitar and his howling
out-of-tune back-up on “Ruby Tuesday.” And there were more poignant moments as well,
like when the soft trombone glided into, “You Can’t Always Get What You Want.”

There was also an unfortunately high cheese factor. The horn section swelled up to
cover many of Richards’ charmingly simplistic guitar riffs and the trio of
backup singers quickly roared in whenever Jagger’s voice faltered. The
videos exploding over the giant monitor descended into shots of women
gyrating in corsets during the few new songs played as if in some desperate
attempt to help the audience focus on the new material. During “Miss You,”
the videos flitted between dirty cartoons and shots of dead rock stars as if
to keep the audience awake while eulogizing Lennon, Garcia, et al.
When the band paused to call up their Web site on the giant monitor, choosing a song from a list voted on by fans on the Internet ( the winner, with a grand total of five tongues: “Under My Thumb”), it seemed more like a chance for Jagger to catch his breath than any real attempt at cyberspace excitement.

But, overall, it was hard not to love the Stones. They were clearly
aiming to please — which in itself is remarkable given their unshakable
status as rock icons. There was an air of inclusiveness about the night.
All of us, even the gray-haired man next to me in baseball cap and Dockers
felt cool enough to join in when Jagger sang, “Brown sugar, how come you
dance so good?”

There’s a sense of genuineness to the Stones’ hugeness, as if they
refuse to feel the irony of stardom — of being at once gray-haired and larger-than-life.
They seem comfortable with the simple truth that many a rock star grapples with unsuccessfully: that their job title is not social commentator or dark prophet, but simply entertainer.
“It’s good to be back,” Richards told the crowd. “It’s good to be.

Continue Reading Close