<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Ryan Brown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/ryan_brown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook-stalking his ex-girlfriend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/facebook_stalking_his_ex_girlfriend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/facebook_stalking_his_ex_girlfriend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Searched and Destroyed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I rummaged through her personal history, I was sad to discover how much I liked her, and how happy they'd been]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every winter, Johannesburg is set on fire. For three months, a bluish haze settles over the city as the local fire department lights a series of controlled burns to stop the surrounding plains from turning to kindling. It was on one of those South African winter nights -- crisp, cold and smelling of smoke -- that I first met my boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend.</p><p>Well, maybe met is too strong a word. My boyfriend M. and I walked into a crowded party and I caught a glimpse of her across the room, clutching the green neck of a Heineken and laughing at a joke I could not hear. I pivoted on my toes, walked the other way, and spent the rest of the night keeping her in my peripheral vision while avoiding eye contact.</p><p>So how did I know it was her? How does anyone these days recognize a person they’ve never met? Facebook, of course.</p><p>But I hadn’t just caught a glimpse of this girl in one of M.’s profile pictures, or seen a grainy icon next to a message on someone’s wall. Over the past several weeks, I had scoured every photo on her profile, hundreds of them, desperately hoping to read into them some explanation for what had happened.</p><p>Oh, and what happened was this: I had stolen her boyfriend.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/facebook_stalking_his_ex_girlfriend/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/facebook_stalking_his_ex_girlfriend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Africa brought out the meat-eater in me</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/23/africa_meat_eating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/23/africa_meat_eating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics of eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International cuisine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vegetarianism and veganism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/08/23/africa_meat_eating</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a lifetime of strict vegetarianism, four months in Senegal taught me the value of all food]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The butcher took a long blade and <em>thwap</em>, sunk it deep into the sheep's ribcage. <em>Thwap</em>. The next cut cracked bone. Soon the man was wrapping a large piece of flesh in newsprint. My Senegalese host mother -- <em>maman</em> as I called her -- handed him a bill and he passed me the heavy, warm package, which was already beginning to bleed through onto my hands. Dinner.</p><p>I don't know what I expected when maman demanded earlier that morning, "Come with me to buy some meat," but it definitely wasn't this. In fact, if I were to write a memoir of the four months I spent as a student in Senegal, I would probably call it, "I Don't Know What I Was Expecting, but It Wasn't This: The Ryan Brown Story." Every moment, especially in the early days, was rife with opportunities for bewilderment. I would get into a taxi, only to have the driver stop along the way to pick up his friend -- and then drive him home first. Or I would respond to a man's "hello" on the street and he would shoot back, "Je pense que je t'aime." <em>I think I love you.</em> Apparently the concept of "Africa time" doesn't apply to matters of the heart.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/23/africa_meat_eating/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/23/africa_meat_eating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Pain Chronicles&#8221;: The science of pain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/22/pain_chronicles_ext2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/22/pain_chronicles_ext2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/08/22/pain_chronicles_ext2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are some people impervious to physical suffering while others can't seem to escape it? An author explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melanie Thernstrom&#8217;s pain began inconspicuously, as a burning ache in her limbs after a long swim. But instead of drifting away over the next few days, the feeling dug in, traversing her neck and shoulder and eventually smothering her entire right arm. She popped aspirin, applied hot compresses, and simply tried to ignore it, but slowly the reality became clear -- this pain wasn&#8217;t going anywhere. For the next several years, she bounced from doctor to doctor searching for an effective treatment for her mysterious ailment. Despite being young, active and seemingly healthy, Thernstrom had joined the ranks of the more than 70 million Americans who suffer from debilitating chronic pain.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/22/pain_chronicles_ext2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/22/pain_chronicles_ext2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summer&#8217;s extreme weather</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/20/extreme_weather_slide_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/20/extreme_weather_slide_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slide Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/2010/08/20/extreme_weather_slide_show</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slide show: The globe's wild recent weather. Plus: An expert on whether it's  global warming's wrath]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skin-crisping heat waves. Massive floods. Runaway glaciers. It feels like everywhere you turn this summer, there are stories and images of dangerous and extreme weather. Just since the beginning of July, Russia has posted its highest recorded temperature ever, 2 million Pakistanis have lost homes to flooding, mudslides have killed more than 1000 Chinese, and one day in rural South Dakota, apocalyptic 2-pound hailstones rained from the sky.</p><p>We've assembled a slide show of some of the most extraordinary photos of floods, fires and other weather disturbances. We also spoke with Heidi Cullen, scientist and author of the newly released book, <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/The-Weather-of-the-Future/Heidi-Cullen/e/9780061726880/?itm=1&amp;USRI=heidi+cullen">"The Weather of the Future: Heat Waves, Extreme Storms, and Other Scenes from a Climate-Changed Planet"</a> to find out what they mean.</p><p>     <strong>We&#8217;ve obviously had a couple crazy months of weather globally. But are all those events just normal weather variations, or does this signal something broader about the health of the planet?</strong>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/20/extreme_weather_slide_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/20/extreme_weather_slide_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Off the Grid&#8221;: The growing appeal of going off the grid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/09/off_the_grid_interview_ext2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/09/off_the_grid_interview_ext2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/08/09/off_the_grid_interview_ext2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A rising number of Americans -- political extremists and normal folks -- are living without gas, phones or power]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For most Americans, tap water, electricity and heating are not only staples of modern convenience -- they're absolute necessities. A small but growing number of Americans, however, have ditched the comfort and convenience of their utilities and chosen instead to live off the grid -- unconnected to gas, water, phone and power networks, and, in some cases, making their life from whatever they can grow or hunt on the land. In 2009, British journalist and documentary filmmaker Nick Rosen traveled around the United States visiting these unplugged Americans to find out what it means to live an off-the-grid life.</p><p>He discovered something unexpected: Living off the grid may be a fringe activity, but it&#8217;s not restricted to any one fringe. America&#8217;s off-gridders are pot farmers and 9/11 truthers, committed environmentalists who grow their own food and libertarians living out of their cars, old school horse-and-buggy Mennonites and hypermodern owners of "earthships" (eco-conscious houses made of dirt-filled tires). They live in towns, on farms, 100 miles from the reach of another human being. They work -- or don&#8217;t. Pay taxes -- or not. But all of them are committed to a simple goal, living without dependence on utility providers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/09/off_the_grid_interview_ext2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/09/off_the_grid_interview_ext2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The plagiarism generation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/plagiarism_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/plagiarism_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/08/05/plagiarism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The N.Y. Times claims students are cheating more than their parents. An expert explains why that may not be true]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, the New York Times ran a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/02/education/02cheat.html?src=me&amp;ref=general">juicy story on college plagiarism</a> that shot to the top of the most-e-mailed list. The piece was yet another in the paper's long history of "the kids are not all right" pieces (other greatest hits include <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/30/fashion/thursdaystyles/30rainbow.html?ei=5070&amp;en=ac7b855f4b419e84&amp;ex=1157774400&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;adxnnlx=1252933540-qAbehfddG4Q+SZnEWxcXSA">rainbow parties</a> and the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/28/style/28hugs.html">epidemic of hugging</a>), which featured students who shamelessly crib from Wikipedia and copy-and-paste whole paragraphs into their essays after a simple Google search. But the real hand-wringer in this digital-era cautionary tale wasn't that the Internet had made it easier to cheat; it's the suggestion that young people no longer realize this content free-for-all is morally wrong.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/plagiarism_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/plagiarism_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Playboy redefines &#8220;safe for work&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/20/playboy_the_smoking_jacket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/20/playboy_the_smoking_jacket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/20/playboy_the_smoking_jacket</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a ploy to stay afloat, the brand launches a supposedly office-friendly website with nearly naked chicks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you spend your days wondering a) how get laid at work, b) what strippers look like when they're cage fighting or c) whether the words "tit" and "pi&#241;ata" can successfully form a descriptive phrase, fear not, Playboy has a new website just for you. From the folks who have been bringing you their luscious mix of nipples and long-form journalism since time immemorial (er, 1953), comes <a href="http://www.thesmokingjacket.com/">The Smoking Jacket</a>, a new venture that contains neither of those things.</p><p>Instead, the site &#8212; which is meant to serve as the "safe for work" cousin of Playboy.com &#8212; reads like College Humor met Maxim at a frat party and then the two of them ran straight out and <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/06/15/bros_icing_bros">iced a couple bros.</a> With features like an advice column on "how to hang out with porn chicks" and a video on the memoir-worthy topic "a day in the life of my boobs," The Smoking Jacket is a Playboy alternative you can page through in your cubicle without accidentally stumbling across a naked photo of Kim Kardashian or an interview with public intellectual Cornel West. Because what's more awkward than your boss discovering your interest in the racial undertones of American politics?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/20/playboy_the_smoking_jacket/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/20/playboy_the_smoking_jacket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uzbek women allege forced sterilization</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/19/uzbek_women_forced_sterilizations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/19/uzbek_women_forced_sterilizations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/19/uzbek_women_forced_sterilizations</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reports emerge of hundreds of victims, but Uzbekistan isn't the only country with this dark history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if the Uzbeks haven't been through enough <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/27/world/asia/27kyrgyz.html?src=mv">class-A terrible shit</a> lately, accusations emerged today that hundreds of the country's women have been forcibly sterilized by the government in an attempt to reduce the birthrate. The main targets of the offensive, according to Uzbek doctors and human rights groups, are women from poor, rural areas, especially those with HIV, TB or drug addiction, and those who already have children.</p><p>"[The doctor] never asked for my approval, never ran any checks, just mutilated me as if I were a mute animal," Saodat Rakhimbayeva, a 24-year old who was sterilized shortly after the birth of her son in March, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gDKvzDeiuK0kQeFqm4K_7wZ8xFmQD9H1485G3">told the Associated Press</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/19/uzbek_women_forced_sterilizations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/19/uzbek_women_forced_sterilizations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women: The missing weapon against AIDS</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/19/women_in_aids_leadership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/19/women_in_aids_leadership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/19/women_in_aids_leadership</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.N. calls for more female voices to lead the global response to the epidemic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were to sketch the global face of HIV today, it would likely look something like this: young, poor and female. Women make up nearly 50 percent of the cases of HIV reported around the world this year, and in Sub-Saharan Africa, far and away the hardest-hit region, more than 60 percent of those living with the virus are women -- and those numbers are growing. Yet from boardrooms to U.N. meetings to the halls of government, the global response to HIV continues to be shaped and directed by men.</p><p>A <a href="http://www.unifem.org/attachments/products/Transforming_the_National_AIDS_Response_Advancing_Women_Leadership_Participation.pdf">new report</a> released today by the United Nations Development Fund for Women highlights the pressing demand for female voices in the global fight against HIV/AIDS, and in particular the voices of HIV-positive women. Currently, less than a quarter of the leadership of global AIDS-fighting organizations are female, and only eight percent -- of either gender -- are HIV positive. The culprits of this imbalance, according to the researchers, are pretty much exactly what you'd expect: gender norms, stigma, the heavy burden of responsibility in domestic life and illiteracy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/19/women_in_aids_leadership/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/19/women_in_aids_leadership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Voyager&#8221;: Who needs astronauts?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/18/voyager_space_exploration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/18/voyager_space_exploration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/07/18/voyager_space_exploration</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The moon landing and space shuttle get all the glory -- but robotic probes are doing the real exploration]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, the world will mark the 41st anniversary of the first lunar landing, when American astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin hopped, skipped and jumped their way across the surface of the moon. The 1969 touchdown was a historic accomplishment, but as science writer and academic Stephen Pyne points out in his new book, <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Voyager/Stephen-J-Pyne/e/9780670021833/?itm=2">"Voyager: Seeking Newer Worlds in the Third Great Age of Discovery,"</a> it wasn't a terribly practical one. We've garnered more useful information over the last few decades, he argues, from our less glamorous unmanned space program than we have from manned flights. Case in point: Voyagers 1 and 2. Over the past 30 years, the probes have made fly-bys of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune; flooded us with groundbreaking scientific data about deep space; and snapped some of the most iconic and enduring images ever taken of our solar system.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/18/voyager_space_exploration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/18/voyager_space_exploration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>91</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the world need TEDWomen?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/16/ted_women_conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/16/ted_women_conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TED Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/16/ted_women_conference</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The TED conference creates a new venue for the ladies. Why not just add more to the main event?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salon editor-in-chief Joan Walsh is the first to admit, she's a bit envious of the luminaries who get invited to the annual TED conference, where the incredible, the famous, and the incredibly famous join to hear and present "ideas worth spreading." Since 1984, the event's organizers have drawn together stars from the worlds of academia, entertainment, technology and business -- plus the crowds willing to shell out $6,000 a pop to see them speak -- to convene, talk and hopefully forge change in the world.</p><p>So when Joan got an invitation to the newly minted TEDWomen, she wasn't sure whether to be flattered or insulted. Was this the real deal, or some kind of consolation prize? She knew TED's track record -- less than 20 percent of "TED talks," as conference presentations are known, have been given by women, and of the speakers at this year's conference, only 17 of 57 will be. Why create a new female-focused conference, Joan wondered, rather than just integrate more women into the program of TED itself?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/16/ted_women_conference/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/16/ted_women_conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s on TV: Not women&#8217;s sports</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/13/womens_sports_not_on_tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/13/womens_sports_not_on_tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/13/womens_sports_not_on_tv</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less than 2 percent of sports news covers female athletes, but why?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gender gap in TV sports coverage is widening, according to <a href="http://www.usc.edu/dept/cfr/html/documents/tvsports.pdf">a new study</a> from the University of Southern California. Wait, did I say "gender gap"? Sorry, I meant "gender cavernous abyss." In a sample of six weeks of ESPN's SportsCenter and Los Angeles area network news sports broadcasts, researchers found that less than 2 percent of the coverage was devoted to women's sports, a plunge from the high -- and that is truly a relative term -- of 8.7 percent recorded a decade ago.</p><p>The study, which has been conducted every five years since 1989, analyzed not only the amount of coverage that women's sports received, but also the type. Using three two-week blocks in 2009 -- one each in March, July and November -- it found that not a single episode of SportsCenter or network sports news shows led with a story about women's sports. And the pieces that did focus on female athletes tended toward the "female soccer player pulls teammate's hair" genre of coverage rather than the "hey, look at this amazing athletic performance" ilk. The obvious reaction to this kind of study is to argue, well, of course ESPN doesn't focus on women's sports. After all, it's a business, not a gender equity nonprofit, and the sports that sell big in this country overwhelmingly star men. Why might that be?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/13/womens_sports_not_on_tv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/13/womens_sports_not_on_tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>French parliament OKs burqa ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/13/burqa_ban_approved/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/13/burqa_ban_approved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/13/burqa_ban_approved</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the popular measure still has another hurdle to contend with: The country's constitution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>France moved one step closer today to saying au revoir to the burqa.</p><p>By a landslide vote of 336 to 1, the lower house of the French Parliament <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e8596f5a-8e98-11df-8a67-00144feab49a.html?ftcamp=rss">approved a ban</a> today on the full head-and-body veil in public spaces, capping off more than a year of contentious debate on the issue. In a strange and fittingly French twist, however, some 200 liberal M.P.s walked out and abstained from casting a ballot at all -- so as best to demonstrate their opposition to both the nature of the ban and the burqa itself. The lone dissenting vote came from a conservative M.P. named Daniel Garrigue, who <a href="http://www.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2010/07/13/l-assemblee-nationale-vote-l-interdiction-du-port-du-voile-integral_1387570_823448.html#ens_id=1351418">told a reporter</a> for the French paper Le Monde, "in fighting extremist behavior, we risk sliding towards a totalitarian society."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/13/burqa_ban_approved/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/13/burqa_ban_approved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In defense of the burqa ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/12/yes_to_the_burqa_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/12/yes_to_the_burqa_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/12/yes_to_the_burqa_ban</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women win if France votes this week to outlaw the conservative Islamic garment, says a Muslim feminist commentator]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, French lawmakers are <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jj-E5nWEYftDQzYIRx0zO06CSKjQD9GRK7880">expected to vote</a>&#160;on a proposed law that would criminalize the burqa, bringing to a head more than a year of heated debate over the conservative Islamic veil in contemporary France. Although the full head and body covering is worn by fewer than 2,000 of the country's 3.5 million Muslims, the movement to ban it has touched off a volatile discussion about issues of immigration, integration and the rights of women. Nonetheless, a&#160;<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hpsJFlPm70IIaBc-vBvbgm9LBFjg">recent poll</a> showed that eight in 10 people in France support slapping a ban on the veil.</p><p>On this side of the Atlantic, however, conversations about European burqa bans have fractured more predictably along political lines. You would be hard pressed to find an American feminist clamoring to see the burqa outlawed, and that perspective has certainly been absent from Broadsheet -- until now. Ahead of parliament's vote on Tuesday, we went to&#160;<a href="http://www.monaeltahawy.com/">Mona Eltahawy</a>, an&#160;Egyptian-born journalist who calls herself "a liberal, a Muslim and a feminist," to better understand the argument for a ban.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/12/yes_to_the_burqa_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/12/yes_to_the_burqa_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>184</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: Middle-aged women like sex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/08/sexual_desires_in_older_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/08/sexual_desires_in_older_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/08/sexual_desires_in_older_women</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study sets out to prove something we already knew, but is there more to the story than what science explains?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today in "hey, didn't we already know that?" is <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uota-tbc070710.php">a recent study</a> out of the University of Texas showing that women hit a sexual peak in middle age. But the reason might surprise you.&#160;According to the researchers, what's ramping up the libidos of women in their 30s and 40s is their declining fertility. Women of a certain age, says study author David Buss, have a psychological urge to "facilitate conception before the window of opportunity closes."</p><p>Buss and his team of psychologists surveyed over 800 women and found that women ages 27 to 45 were more likely than either their highly fertile younger sisters (ages 18 to 26) or the menopausal set (over 46) to "have frequent sexual fantasies,"&#160;"think about sexual activity," or display "a willingness to have casual sex." And from an evolutionary biology standpoint, the researchers argue, that makes sense -- in order to propagate the species, women with declining fertility recognize, consciously or otherwise, that if they want to have children, well, they'd better snap to it. In other words, when your biological clock says jump, you better, uh, run off and have lots of sex.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/08/sexual_desires_in_older_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/08/sexual_desires_in_older_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Losing Our Cool&#8221;: The high price of staying cool</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/05/losing_our_cool_air_conditioning_ext2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/05/losing_our_cool_air_conditioning_ext2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/07/05/losing_our_cool_air_conditioning_ext2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How air conditioning changed the American landscape, transformed our politics, and is endangering our health]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last half century, air conditioning has joined fireworks, swimming pools and charred hamburgers as a ubiquitous ingredient of an American summer. It&#8217;s no exaggeration to say it has changed the way this country functions, shaping everything from where we&#8217;re willing to live (Las Vegas, anyone?) to the amount of sex we have (more: It&#8217;s never too hot to get it on when the A.C. is blasting). Nine out of 10 new homes in this country are built with central air conditioning, and Americans now use as much electricity to power our A.C. as the entire continent of Africa uses for, well, everything. It has so thoroughly scrambled our way of life that when the National Academy of Engineering chose its 20 greatest engineering accomplishments of the last century, A.C. not only made the list, it clocked in ahead of spacecraft, highways and even the Internet.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/05/losing_our_cool_air_conditioning_ext2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/05/losing_our_cool_air_conditioning_ext2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google ups benefits for gays</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/01/google_benefits_increase_for_gays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/01/google_benefits_increase_for_gays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/01/google_benefits_increase_for_gays</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The web giant will pay the extra taxes on same-sex partner benefits for its esteemed "gayglers"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For LGBT tech nerds, Google has long been a coveted employer. The company offers benefits for same-sex partners, spoke out <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/our-position-on-californias-no-on-8.html">against Prop 8</a>, and even has a <a href="http://www.google.com/jobs/gayglers/">special recruiting website</a> for aspiring gayglers, as the company's queer staff are known. And beginning today, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/01/your-money/01benefits.html">the New York Times reports</a>, Google will also foot the bill for a hefty tax that its employees pay on health insurance coverage for their same sex partners.</p><p>Google isn't the first company to cough up the cash for the tax, which amounts to a yearly average of $1069 per couple, but it's a rare practice, even among employers that offer partner benefits. I have to say, this is a savvy strategic move for the web giant, which competes with a sea of other benefit-heavy Silicone Valley companies for its talent. And, as experts note, when Google makes a statement like this, other companies are likely to follow. "When you have a high-profile company doing anything, that tends to get into the mind of the culture, and it can have a more diffuse effect," one health consultant told the Times.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/01/google_benefits_increase_for_gays/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/01/google_benefits_increase_for_gays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guns for batterers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/supreme_court_guns_domestic_violence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/supreme_court_guns_domestic_violence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/06/29/supreme_court_guns_domestic_violence</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One advocate says a domestic violence conviction is no match for the Second Amendment -- but is he right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should perpetrators of domestic violence be allowed to own guns?</p><p>Now there&#8217;s a question I never thought I&#8217;d have to ask. Call me crazy, but I&#8217;d put people who batter their family members right up there with the mentally ill and Dick Cheney on the list of people who should never, ever be allowed near a gun. And Congress agrees; that's why in 1996 it passed a law that barred anyone convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence from transporting, owning or using a gun in this country.</p><p>But that may be about to change. In a contentious 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that state and local governments <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/06/28/guns_for_everyone">cannot enact bans on firearm ownership,</a> and legal experts predict that the ruling will bring a flood of challenges to existing gun control laws -- including those that prohibit batterers from owning firearms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/supreme_court_guns_domestic_violence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/supreme_court_guns_domestic_violence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soccer player slaps female reporter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/24/algerian_player_slaps_journalist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/24/algerian_player_slaps_journalist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/06/24/algerian_player_slaps_journalist</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And FIFA does nothing -- not that we're surprised, given its track record on anti-female behavior]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Algeria took on the United States in a World Cup match yesterday, the team had some trouble going on the offense -- that is, until after the game. Walking through a press zone after his team's tournament-eliminating defeat, star striker Rafik Saifi approached a female journalist named Asma Halimi and allegedly&#160;<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2010/8757329.stm">slapped her across the face</a>.</p><p>The bizarre wordless attack, which provoked Halimi to lunge back at her assailant, occurred in full view of dozens of witnesses. Her crime? Apparently last year Halimi, who writes for the Algerian sports daily Competition, published a translation of an interview Saifi did with an Arabic paper in Qatar, revealing his engagement to a French woman.</p><p>Yeah, Algeria and France have a sensitive relationship (colonialism will do that to you), and yeah, Saifi was probably trying to keep that information on the down low, but it should go without saying that it is completely unacceptable for a player to strike a journalist -- period. Full stop. <em>Especially</em> when her "offense" was to publish information that he had already made publicly available through another media outlet.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/24/algerian_player_slaps_journalist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/24/algerian_player_slaps_journalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The pill without a prescription?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/22/birth_control_over_the_counter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/22/birth_control_over_the_counter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/06/22/birth_control_over_the_counter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One expert says birth control should be offered over the counter, but in the meantime, we've got other options]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I come from a generation of pill poppers. We take them at work, at school, on trains, in public bathrooms, before we go to sleep or with breakfast, under the eyes of parents, friends, significant others. For many young women like me, the birth control pill is so ubiquitous that it neither induces shame nor carries any shock value. And yet, access to the pill remains uneven, and some 3.1 million pregnancies in the United States each year are unintended. In a thoughtful New York Times Op-Ed, Kelly Blanchard, president of the nonprofit Ibis Reproductive Health, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/22/opinion/22blanchard.html?scp=2&amp;sq=birth%20control&amp;st=cse">proposes a novel solution</a>: make the pill available over the counter.</p><p>To anyone who has ever missed a pill because she couldn't get to the pharmacy in time, or for women whose access to a doctor is sporadic or nonexistent, this is exactly the kind of holy-shit-why-did-no-one-think-of-this-before idea that we've been waiting for. As Blanchard points out, 50 years of use has proved that hormonal birth control meets the standards for OTC distribution: you don't really require a doctor's expertise to tell you if you need the pill (are you sexually active? Do you not want a baby? Check, check), you can't become addicted, the side effects are mild and even the most severe are less dangerous than those of some medications already available over the counter.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/22/birth_control_over_the_counter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/22/birth_control_over_the_counter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
