<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Steve Burgess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/steve_burgess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why the U.S. must invade Canada &#8212; now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/30/canada_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/30/canada_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2003/06/30/canada</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It didn't support the war, it's soft on pot and gays, its economy is rolling and U.S. troops are bored. Anyway, reasons to invade countries are no longer needed!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> There's nothing like the deep, satisfying belch that follows a good meal. But hey America, what about dessert? Iran and Syria have both been offered up as succulent dishes to follow the Iraqi main course. May I suggest a simpler alternative, right next door? Invade Canada. Hell, we're asking for it. </p><p>Canada -- a ripe plum ready for the taking. And the plum was probably imported from Florida, which will make it all the easier. It's not like it hasn't been considered before -- Michael Moore's one stab at a fictional film (unless you count his documentaries) -- was "Canadian Bacon," in which President Alan Alda takes on Canada. The mere convenience of it is enough to justify it -- a regiment in Detroit could blitz Toronto from 9 to 5 and still go home to watch the CNN highlights with the kids every night. </p><p>There are plenty of reasons to invade your passive-aggressive northern neighbor. (Or "neighbour," as we spitefully choose to spell it. Doesn't that just piss you off?) But never mind -- thanks to the lessons learned in Iraq, reasons are no longer necessary. The Bush administration's labored justifications for the Iraq invasion, served up as convincingly as a chocolate-smeared 6-year-old's explanation of where the cookies went, proved to be utterly irrelevant. Most Americans, it turned out, were only too happy to kick some non-American ass and didn't really require an explanation. As a prelude to the invasion of Canada, Bush could merely produce satellite photos proving conclusively that American troops are bored. Good enough for most. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/06/30/canada_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/30/canada_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgy Do-Right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/26/bush_214/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/26/bush_214/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/11/26/bush</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A top Canadian official calls Bush a "moron" -- and her countrymen cheer. Why do our northern neighbors think the president is a chimp?


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes a lot for Canada to make the papers, but this was a good one. Last week at a NATO conference Francoise Ducros, a top aide to Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien, was overheard calling President George W. Bush "a moron." Out loud. </p><p>It was, to say the least, a bit of a diplomatic faux pas. In the Canadian Parliament, opposition politicians screamed for the head of Ducros, Chretien's director of communications. Ducros paid the price for her indiscreet comment Tuesday when Chretien accepted her resignation. (She had offered to resign last week, but the prime minister initially refused to accept her resignation.) Before Ducros departed, a Canadian news organization ran a poll, asking the public what Ducros' fate should be. </p><p>The winning suggestion: Give the woman a promotion. </p><p>No, these are not good days for the president's international image. Bush may bask in warm approval ratings back home, but Canadians seem to view him with a mixture of fear and contempt, a German government official compared his foreign policy to Hitler's, while European political cartoonists almost uniformly portray him as various species of monkey. And those are his allies. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/11/26/bush_214/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/26/bush_214/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please note: You&#8217;re in the Britney Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/05/britney_gen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/05/britney_gen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2002/02/05/britney_gen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it our memory that's going or Pepsi's?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about that. For once the football game was as interesting as the commercials. Which meant that for almost four solid hours on Sunday, millions of viewers could not safely dash to the bathroom. The drawdown at approximately 10:10 p.m. EST must have made city reservoirs swirl like toilet bowls. </p><p> You can't ignore the ads anymore. They have their own <a target="new" href="http://www.superbowl-ads.com/">Web site.</a> Ever since director Ridley Scott's 1984 Macintosh spot, the commercials have been a major part of the annual Super Bowl show -- a telecast that draws approximately 800 million viewers worldwide. (One survey claims that 16 percent of viewers tune in only for the commercials, and 58 percent pay more attention to the ads than to the game.) Even as endless player interviews and game prognosticators droned on through the week, particular ads were generating their own pre-telecast hype. This year's advertisers included surprise newcomers -- the White House -- and surprising dropouts, like EDS, whose "Herding Cats" and "Running With the Squirrels" ads were previous Super Bowl standouts. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/02/05/britney_gen/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/05/britney_gen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why does my Yankee loathing run so deep?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/25/yanks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/25/yanks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2001/10/25/yanks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it possible to love New York yet pause a moment to curse the Bronx Bombers and all their works? You bet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, everybody loves New York. Mayor Rudy, New York's Finest, the firefighters -- all part of the corny Big Apple bumper sticker plastered on our collective heart. As we watch the city get off the mat and start swinging again, people everywhere salute the plucky citizens of America's mightiest metropolis. And then some of us turn toward Yankee Stadium and offer salutes of a different kind. To hell with solidarity -- we still hate the Yankees. </p><p> Now, in the fall of 2001, is that OK? Is it cool to lie awake wishing painful strains on every pinstriped groin? At this dark moment when we stand shoulder to shoulder with all the residents of Gotham, can we pause a moment to curse the Bronx Bombers and all their works? Hell yes. I hate those Bronx bastards. </p><p> I know -- sports don't matter anymore. Sept. 11 put everything in perspective. Empty athletic contests mean nothing in the big scheme of yada yada. Why then do my teeth grind like tectonic plates as I watch Paul expletive O'Neill circle the bases like a prize spaniel prancing around a dog ring? Why does my Yankee loathing run so deep? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/10/25/yanks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/25/yanks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Janet Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/21/janet_jackson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/21/janet_jackson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/bc/2001/08/21/janet_jackson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her best singles represent the kind of quality craftsmanship that made us listen to the radio in the first place.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are <a href="/ent/clear_channel/index.html">dark days</a> for pop radio. Calculation rules. TV shows like "Making the Band" and "Popstars" celebrate the corporate Meccano set that is current pop culture; the deluge of boy bands and Britney leaves us grateful even for a bloated and self-indulgent remake of "Lady Marmalade" if it can at least remind us of an inspired original. Pop fans wait for the dawn to break -- and in the meantime, thank the radio gods for Janet Jackson. </p><p>For 15 years, spanning the eras from Journey to Destiny's Child, Janet Jackson has frequently provided the best reason to turn on the radio -- although, admittedly, the case for opening a good book is usually a lot stronger. Top 40 has always been more or less a sausage factory. Between the occasional bursts of true genius that change the prevailing flavor of pop, journeyman producers and performers rush in to fill the gaps with sawdust imitations of the real joy. Much of pop history has consisted of marking time until the next big thing. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/08/21/janet_jackson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/21/janet_jackson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The powder puff girls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/13/ichiriki/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/13/ichiriki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2001/06/13/ichiriki</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My $5,000 night at the most exclusive geisha house in Japan.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My girlfriend Kaori and I are riding the Thunderbird 26 train from Kanazawa to Kyoto when her cellphone begins playing "Waltz of the Flowers." Mr. Nagata is on the line. The conversation is all Japanese to me, but amid the unintelligible torrent I hear the one word that tells me everything I need to know -- "Ichiriki." Kaori gives me the thumbs-up. Tomorrow night, Mr. Nagata will guide us into the inner sanctum of a disappearing order -- Ichiriki, the most famous geisha house in all Japan. </p><p> Anyone familiar with Arthur Golden's <a href="/books/feature/2000/05/03/geisha/">"Memoirs of a Geisha"</a> will know the Ichiriki, a place few Japanese and even fewer foreigners have ever seen. (The Ichiriki's mistress contends that Golden has never stepped through its doorway.) Much of the action in his pre- and postwar tale of Japan takes place at this doyenne of Kyoto geisha establishments, located in the ancient city's Gion district. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/13/ichiriki/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/13/ichiriki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UFOs in the land of the rising sun</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/31/noto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/31/noto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2001/05/31/noto</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Japan's version of Roswell, N.M., you don't stay out after dark, and even the soup contains flying saucers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My girlfriend, Kaori, and I are preparing for a day trip to the Noto Peninsula on the northern coast of Japan when the man we are traveling to see calls with a friendly piece of advice about our visit. "Don't stay out too late tonight," says Johsen Takano. "Aliens will abduct you." He's only half joking. </p><p>Then Kaori fields another call, this one from a concerned friend. "Don't stay out there too late," she says. "North Koreans will abduct you." She's absolutely serious. </p><p>The Noto Peninsula is one spooky piece of turf -- Japan's Alien Central, in at least three different ways. For one, China's people smugglers, known as snakeheads, have made the Noto a favorite dumping ground, loosing a tide of desperate illegals onto its remote ocean beaches. </p><p>And hysterical friends aside, residents of the Noto do indeed cast worried looks to the sea as twilight falls -- the fishing boats plying the waters off this northern spit are not always what they seem. Just over the empty horizon lies North Korea. Like visitors from a hostile galaxy, spy boats from this planet's most isolated society bristle with bogus trawling gear as they electronically probe the Noto -- a region North Koreans (unlike most Japanese) consider highly significant. Japanese news programs have reported cases of Noto residents snatched from local beaches after stumbling upon paranoid North Korean operatives. These particular alien abductions are very real. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/31/noto/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/31/noto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seeking Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/30/moriarty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/30/moriarty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/11/30/moriarty</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of his "Law &#38; Order" days, actor Michael Moriarty is exposing Canada to his bizarre antics and right-wing politics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this rainy Hollywood branch plant where American studios take advantage of the flea-bitten Canadian dollar to film on the cheap, the locals are used to seeing stars fly in for six-week stints and then flee south again without even showing their faces at the wrap party. Vancouverites can be remarkably thin-skinned about it. A couple of years back, <a href="/directory/topics/david_duchovny/index.html">David Duchovny's</a> flip observation that our city gets about 400 inches of rain a day caused a regional firestorm of indignation, compounded by his demand that <a href="/directory/topics/the_x_files/index.html">"The X-Files"</a> (which, more than any other production, Vancouver claimed as its own) be relocated to Los Angeles. Vancouver knows it is only Tinseltown's $2 whore, but it keeps turning tricks and hoping the johns will fall in love. </p><p>Wink at the cheerleader or the varsity quarterback, and it's usually the mascot in the squirrel costume who winks back. Vancouver lusts after the likes of <a href="/bc/1999/03/cov_02bc.html">Paul Newman</a> and <a href="/directory/topics/gwyneth_paltrow/index.html">Gwyneth Paltrow.</a> So who falls in love with us? Michael Moriarty. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/11/30/moriarty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/30/moriarty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star dreams</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/09/celebrity_dreams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/09/celebrity_dreams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2000 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/10/09/celebrity_dreams</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While we're awake, the famous are everywhere. Naturally, they reappear during our nightly regurgitation of mental effluvia.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a member of the <a target="new" href="/directory/topics/the_beatles/index.html">Beatles.</a> George Harrison, I think. I'm in a running gun battle with the other Beatles -- except Ringo, who's on my team. I'm hugging the wall, clutching a machine gun, when McCartney comes around the corner looking for blood. Too late, Paul. I let go a fusillade and the composer of "Yesterday" folds up like a daybed. Lennon has been dispatched, too. We're hunting down that bastard <a href="/people/bc/2000/07/25/martin/index.html">George Martin,</a> when I wake up. </p><p>Dreams about celebrities not only seem tawdry but are often perplexing (I like the Beatles), suitable only for drowsy teenagers drifting off on bunk beds while copies of Seventeen magazine slip to the floor. But I do it all the time, and it's not as if I can help it. The famous simply show up and assume various roles, including frequently my own. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/09/celebrity_dreams/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/09/celebrity_dreams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The evil that spiders do</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/28/spiders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/28/spiders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/09/28/spiders</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're hard-wired to despise these monsters for a reason. Now hand me that plunger.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was relaxing with the newspaper on my knees and my pants around my ankles when movement on the bathroom floor made my head swivel. What I saw coming toward me set in motion the usual reflexive reaction -- a full-body spasm accompanied by an involuntary vocalization wrung from my diaphragm like dirty water from a dishrag. For an arachnophobe, just a regular day at the office. But this time was different. </p><p>Taking in the size, speed and trajectory of the attacker, my brain scrolled rapidly through the category of "Spiders found in houses and apartments." No match found. As I called up the next category, "Spiders found in Borneo," two alarms became five. I screamed -- twice, I'm afraid -- and jumped into the bathtub. The monster rolled to a stop beneath a little table and sat motionless beside the baseboard. It was the biggest spider I'd ever seen outside of the Discovery Channel. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/28/spiders/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/28/spiders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank God the Yanks aren&#8217;t hosting the Olympics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/15/ozolympix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/15/ozolympix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/09/15/ozolympix</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe this year we'll be spared the USA's boorish egoism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a target="new" href="http://www.olympics.com/eng/">Sydney 2000 Olympics</a> have three official mascots -- Olly the kookaburra, Syd the platypus and Millie the echidna. Only one of them is poisonous. Hey, for Australia, that's not bad. Just be grateful they didn't go with Olly the blue-ringed octopus, posing for pictures with three lethal tentacles around your shoulders. </p><p> There are definitely drawbacks to holding the Olympics in Oz, among them starting the Summer Games roughly two weeks after the end of the Australian winter. Then, too, there is the possibility of athletes testing positive for the venom of the Sydney funnel web spider or the giant brown snake. Luckily the tests are self-administering and basically involve awaiting the onset of rigor mortis. </p><p>Yes, in the Lethal Olympics, the competitors from Down Under take gold every time. Of the three mascots, it's Syd you need to watch out for -- male platypuses have poison spurs. The island continent boasts the deadliest spider and the deadliest snake (the aforementioned twosome), as well as rejected mascot candidate the blue-ringed octopus. And don't count out that wiry lightweight, the box jellyfish; gram for gram, it's the single most poisonous creature on the planet. Not to suggest that all Australian animals are poisonous. Great white sharks carry no venom whatsoever. Ditto the hammerhead. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/15/ozolympix/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/15/ozolympix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Last words and last suppers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/19/lastwords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/19/lastwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2000 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/06/19/lastwords</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An odd rumination on the final remarks of the world's luminaries, coupled with a spirited defense of the much-maligned sandwich invented by Elvis' recently deceased cook.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Syrian government, the last person to speak with Syrian <a href="/news/feature/2000/06/13/assad/">President Hafez Al-Assad</a> before his death June 10 was Lebanese President Emile Lahoud. "His last words," Lahoud reported, "were: 'Our destiny is to build a better future for our countries, a safe future for our children. We have to give them something better than what we inherited.' And then there was a sudden silence." </p><p>That must be when the piano landed on him. The official cause of death was said to be heart failure, which is possible too -- bad things happen when you forget to stop and take a breath. Certainly, we can rule out cancer of the tongue. </p><p>Good thing Lahoud knew shorthand. Whatever it was that finally silenced the Middle East strongman, at least they didn't strike up the band before he got through the big soliloquy. Not everyone is so lucky when the curtain drops. Contrast Assad's stirring valedictory address with Tallulah Bankhead's final words in 1968. "Codeine," she reportedly muttered. "Bourbon." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/19/lastwords/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/19/lastwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hell is back in business</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/12/hell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/12/hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/06/12/hell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trends come and go, so don't be surprised when you hear the latest: Hades is hot, angels are not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>here are gaps that form in our modern world -- temporary imbalances that eventually right themselves, restoring equilibrium. Now may be one of those corrective times. The <a href="http://www.salonmagazine.com/march97/columnists/shoales970320.html">angel craze</a> seems to have petered out and the moment could be right to address a neglected spiritual need: our deep-seated longing for hell. </p><p> We were born too late for all the comforting certainties -- old-fashioned values, death from syphilis, searing fusillades of brimstone. Once there were no situational ethics, and forget about moral relativism. Cuss on a Sunday and, presto, you were a Grade A roaster on a subterranean spit, with the deli manager on permanent break. </p><p> But such cruelty could never survive in a soft-sell age. The gradual phasing-out of a retributive afterlife model gained official approval when even the venerable Church of England gave <a href="/special/aprilone/2000/bc_satan/index.html">the devil</a> a pink slip. The church's revised theological interpretation, first unveiled several years ago, mothballed the pitchforks and doused the lake of fire. Hell, said the archbishops, is merely a state of nonbeing -- a never-ending flight delay in a timeless Des Moines. (Odd when you consider that the official head of the Church of England is Queen Elizabeth II, who might at least preserve a little scorpion-stuffed corner of purgatory for <a href="/sept97/dianalist.html ">pesky daughters-in-law.</a>) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/12/hell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/12/hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>R. Crumb</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/02/crumb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/02/crumb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/bc/2000/05/02/crumb</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the bull-goose legend of underground comix the Brueghel of our time or the purveyor of an arrested juvenile vision?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>S</b>ir Thomas Crapper did not really invent the flush toilet. The word "gringo" was not inspired by the American troops who sang "Green grow the grasses-o," during the Mexican-American War -- the word was in use 100 years previously. Still, those popular misconceptions and countless others survive through constant repetition, and someday they will be joined by new linguistic fables even now being born.</p><p>Here's a likely candidate -- years from now it will be widely circulated that the word "crummy" derives from the work of cartoonist Robert Crumb, a world-class malcontent of the late 20th century. Crumb surveyed the urban landscape of his era and pronounced his verdict: Everything sucks big time, including humanity and, most especially, Robert Crumb. "At least I hate myself as much as I hate anybody else," Crumb once said. Coming from the author of <a target="new" href="http://fantagraphics.com/artist/crumb/self/self.html">"Self-Loathing Comics,"</a> you can take that to the bank.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/02/crumb/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/02/crumb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you fold it, they will come</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/triplea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/triplea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/04/03/triplea</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minor league baseball is bittersweet. The players are praying for a ticket out, and it&#039;s even worse when the team is looking to move, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>s is the case most years, they held a<br /> World Series last October. And as is so<br /> often the case, the New York Yankees won<br /> it. There followed the usual parade and<br /> emotional speeches, the players<br /> relishing that sweet period between the<br /> final out of the season and Daryl<br /> Strawberry's next drug suspension. A<br /> happy ritual, playing out as it should.</p><p>A month earlier, there had been another<br /> World Series -- the Triple-A version.<br /> The minor league championship differed<br /> from its more famous parent in a number<br /> of ways. It was held in a neutral site<br /> -- in fact, probably the most neutral<br /> site in America, Las Vegas, where fan<br /> loyalties await the publishing of the<br /> morning line.</p><p>The underdog Vancouver Canadians took<br /> the series, defeating the Oklahoma<br /> Redhawks. Although the team celebrated<br /> in traditional jumping-jack fashion,<br /> they did so in front of nearly empty<br /> stands. But the real difference between<br /> Triple-A and the Show became evident the<br /> next day -- unlike the victorious Yanks,<br /> the Canadians did not return home in<br /> triumph. They didn't return to Vancouver<br /> at all, nor have they since. This spring<br /> the defending Triple-A champs are<br /> congregating in Sacramento, Calif., as<br /> the newly renamed River Cats. For the<br /> now-defunct Vancouver Canadians, victory<br /> was truly final.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/triplea/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/triplea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confessions of an awards whore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/25/awardstramp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/25/awardstramp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoholism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/03/25/awardstramp</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sneered at the whole cheesy routine until I was nominated for one. Was I thrilled? I was Sally Field squared.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b> young woman in an evening gown, standing alone on a spotlighted stage, strings together three solid minutes of empty platitudes and vaguely inspirational aphorisms. The Miss Vancouver Pageant is in full swing. One contestant sings "My Heart Will Go On." Another sings "My Heart Will Go On" in Italian. Hardly a 21st century phenomenon, but so what? <a href="/ent/special/oscars/index.html">Oscars,</a> <a href="/ent/feature/2000/02/24/grammys/index.html">Grammys,</a> Miss America -- competitive pageants are a hardy species.</p><p>The absolute best movie, best liner notes, most admirable and accomplished young woman -- apparently there is no such thing as an unquantifiable virtue. Vancouver recently hosted the Aboriginal Achievement Awards, at which a man was honored for negotiating a native-land claim (although best treaty was not an actual category). The relentless procession of awards is frequently derided as pointless, ridiculous, even ludicrous. All of which is probably true.</p><p>But also irrelevant. Awards ceremonies, so often cursed by bad Celine Dion renditions -- or, even worse, Celine Dion -- are nonetheless inherently compelling. The love of horse races and big blue ribbons must surely be in our DNA.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/25/awardstramp/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/25/awardstramp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Hey Nineteen&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/14/dan_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/14/dan_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/03/14/dan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hearing Steely Dan&#039;s new single sent me back to adolescence and reminded me of the future I had forgotten.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>t was a classic rock station, not given<br /> to hot hits and fast-rising new<br /> releases. For certain acts, though, they<br /> were clearly willing to make<br /> exceptions. "Twenty years since their<br /> last album," said my car stereo,<br /> "here's a new one from Steely Dan."</p><p>And before I had time to process that<br /> remarkable statement, there it<br /> was. Not much doubt about it either. As<br /> Donald Fagen sang, "How about a kiss for<br /> your cousin Dupree," it was as if a<br /> magic phonograph needle had somehow<br /> discovered some new grooves on an old<br /> copy of "Gaucho." That 1980 album had<br /> looked to be Steely Dan's swan song,<br /> although Fagen and collaborator Walter<br /> Becker had always been coy about<br /> possible new projects and had even<br /> staged a reunion tour. Now, the DJ<br /> informed me (in what must have been a<br /> welcome break from introducing "Misty<br /> Mountain Hop" for the gazillionth time)<br /> that the Dan was back with a new CD,<br /> "Two Against Nature."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/14/dan_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/14/dan_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh, make me over</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/24/blind_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/24/blind_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/02/24/blind</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a complete fashion dunce, I was dependent on the kindness of 
sisters. Until my bosses took charge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>L</b>ate night TV is educational. Watch and you'll learn of the bewildering number of body parts and/or functions that can misfire, leading to countless syndromes and their corresponding public service announcements. Watching that parade of potential genetic deficiencies makes me feel much better about my own small trouble. I'm lucky -- with me it's only the style glands.</p><p>Still, not having a clue is no picnic. As a complete fashion dunce, I'm frequently at a loss, and, like a foreigner in Paraguay, dependent on the kindness of sisters. I simply lack any instinct for what's current and can only base my personal shopping on memorization and what worked last time. As any blind person could tell you, that only works until somebody rearranges the furniture -- and in fashion, that tends to happen a lot.</p><p>I never trusted fashion. Random, arbitrary, senseless, constantly contradicting itself -- if something looks good one year, why should it be a joke the next? Such nonsense was not for me.  As a child my only fashion hero was Roy Rogers, and, had I been left to my own devices, so he would have remained.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/24/blind_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/24/blind_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/15/martin_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/15/martin_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/obit/2000/01/15/martin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remembering the Mad magazine cartoonist who created characters like Fester Bestertester and Karbuncle, yet still had the time to invent National Gorilla Suit Day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>D</b>on Martin, the former Mad magazine cartoonist, was no A.A. Milne. His characters, Fonebone and Fester Bestertester among them, bore no resemblance to Winnie the Pooh. But news of Martin's death from cancer last week at age 68 certainly gave me a Christopher Robin moment. I'm sure I'm not alone.</p><p>The poignant coda of the Pooh books suggested that, long after we children grow up to become indifferent adults, our childhood fantasy worlds live on in some lonely forest glade, patiently awaiting our return.</p><p>Hearing Don Martin's name again (in the usual unfortunate circumstances that cause long-forgotten names to reappear) was like awakening from a dream. How did I manage to so thoroughly and completely forget the man whose comic sensibilities ruled my grade school world?</p><p>Not every '60s kid discarded Martin cartoons, and Mad in general, with their lunchboxes and GI Joes (not every '60s kid discarded their lunchboxes and GI Joes either, which is why some are now wealthy and some cursing Mom for cleaning their rooms). But for every reader who stayed loyal, many more dropped William M. Gaines' impish publication and reinvented themselves as sophisticated '70s National Lampoon readers. A lot of what filled the pages of Mad was better off forgotten. But in our rush to grow up, we unfairly tossed Don Martin out with the bath water.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/15/martin_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/15/martin_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Schulz</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/schulz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/schulz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/bc/2000/01/04/schulz</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With his globally recognized "Peanuts" characters, he delved into the psyche of children and created daily morality plays that became part of the public consciousness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he year is 1995 -- the Red Baron is long dead. Now it's Snoopy vs. the<br /> California Department of Insurance. Metropolitan Life, the insurance<br /> company whose ads feature Charles Schulz's popular "Peanuts" characters, is<br /> in trouble. In her Newsweek column of March 6, 1995, Jane Bryant Quinn<br /> details complaints against MetLife representatives accused of screwing<br /> seniors with shady deals. "In California," she writes, "MetLife cases<br /> are popping up like mushrooms ... A California law firm will soon file a<br /> class action suit against the company." And all the while, Charlie Brown<br /> -- the same round-headed kid who railed against Christmas commercialism<br /> and cradled a pathetic evergreen for successive generations of wide-eyed<br /> children -- grinned out of countless ads bearing the slogan: "Get Met.<br /> It Pays."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/schulz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/04/schulz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
