Susan McCarthy

The road to hell was paved with handbags

  • more
    • All Share Services

All my life my mother has carried one or another large purse, full of many remarkable things. I have often marveled at her confidence that everything a person might need — Band-Aids, lipstick, folding hatchet — is in her purse, and at the incredible difficulty in finding it where it lurks among the ticketstubs. Her purses, despite being large, festooned with noisy keys and adorned with colorful doodads, have a poltergeist ability tovanish utterly from human ken and then suddenly appear grinning inthe middle of the hall floor, or on the table in a pool of mysteryfluid, or across town at the garden center.

Despite the wonderful mysteries of my mother’s purse, I have chosen to forswear the magic and repudiate purses altogether, forthey come with too many accompanying curses.

First of all, if you have a purse, you have to carry it.You have one less hand free, or one less shoulder free, and it limits your range of movement, making it awkward if you suddenly need to leap in the air and click your heels together. Sure, youget used to it, but so do people with malevolent dagger-wieldingdemons on their backs — I am generally fed up and I do not want to have to get used to one more thing.

A purse is easy to steal. Visible, recognizable, detachable.It might as well have a target painted on it. Picking pocketsis a skill, but purse-snatching is an entry-level job.

Even the gaudiest purse is easy to lose. When I was given one, in seventh grade, I took it to school. There I set it down and lost it every time I had a thought, which meant several times a day.

But most of all, a purse represents the first step on the slippery slope to loveliness. Why don’t men carry purses? Becausethey aren’t trying to be lovely. Purses are needed mainly to carry cosmetics and what are known as “sanitary supplies.” It’s the cosmetics that scare me.

Cosmetics are meant to make a person lovelier. As an obsessive individual, I long ago decided that if I were to try to pursue loveliness, there would be no end. I would never be able to stop applying foundation at the neck. It would be whole-body loveliness or nothing. As for beauty being only skin-deep, I don’t know if I could accept that. I’d probably have to get my internal organs prettily tattooed. So years ago I determined to consider loveliness beyond me and work on my personality. Or at least on passing as a native of this planet.

Thus obsessive attempts to control my obsessiveness have ledto no need for cosmetics. Also, because of my obsessiveness, I don’t get out much, hence, even less need for a purse. Also if I had a purse I would have to decide whether to call it a “purse,” a “handbag” or a “pocketbook,” choices of significance — how can one leave the house until that’s been hammered out?

Having no purse, I jam stuff in my pockets. This means wearing things with working pockets, limiting the attire options,but I have already mentioned abandoning loveliness. Occasionally I feel compelled to wear superficially lovely, pocketless garments in order to pass as a female earthling, but one can always put a key in one’s stocking, next to the mad money.

I admit that I have cheated. Backpacks and book bags have flitted through my life and have attempted to become Big Purses.Sometimes I have weakened and slipped a wallet into a backpack or keys into a book bag (or, most depraved of all, into the pocket of a companion), but always I have drawn back from the cliff, realizing that the next thing would be groping around in it for lipstick and then I would be going to sleep with slices of kiwi on my eyelids and I would be lost to a world of loveliness.

Once you have a purse, of course, there is a natural desire for completeness, a desire felt by residents of all planets I know, not just my mother, and if you are not careful you may end up witha satchel so loaded with penknives and road maps and hankies and police whistles and glue guns that you need a small wheeled cart to transport it all.

In the golden technological future, we will all be followed by robot retinues toting our stuff for us. There will be nodistinction between girly girls with big purses and manly men with bulging pockets. Everywhere we go, we will all have the comfort of being accompanied by lots of our nicest stuff, including devices to repel pirate robots hijacking our own robots, so it will be necessary to wear blaster pistols and personal jet-packs and futuristic tight-fitting clothing (why does one never dress baggyin the future?) with big flanges on the shoulders, but I still donot expect to have time to waste on loveliness.

The worst trip ever

A sweaty cross-country trek in a 1937 Plymouth with two cranky siblings, a kangaroo rat in a box and a pogo stick turns into family legend.

  • more
    • All Share Services

When the subject of horrible car trips comes up at family
gatherings, this one is always proclaimed the worst. It wins hands
down for ghastly conditions, ferocious sibling battles and the
gratuitous involvement of wild animals and infernal machines. But
I missed it, having neglected to be born, and it’s obvious to me it
was the best.

In the summer of 1944 my grandparents drove their 1937 Plymouth
from their native West Virginia to California, where my grandfather
and great-uncle Harry would do war work in a DuPont factory. But,
because of the war, many motels and restaurants were closed or off-limits to civilians. Gas rationing limited them to 45 mph, so it was a long, long haul. And it was hot. My grandparents,
who had fled West Virginia to save their marriage, were barely on
speaking terms. The kids, Kenneth, 10, and Martha, 11, were
constantly fighting in the back seat. Also in the back seat was
patient Uncle Harry, trying to keep the kids from destroying each
other utterly.

The day they left West Virginia, Kenneth’s friend Sonny gave him
his precious pogo stick as a farewell present. Kenneth pogoed
across America. He couldn’t pogo in the car, so he grabbed every
other opportunity to pogo. I envision my grandmother, at the end of
a long, hot, horrible day, entering a motel, prepared to plead or
battle with the manager for a chance to stay the night despite
their civilian status. Behind her trail Martha, whining, and
Kenneth: Boing! Thud! Boing! Thud! Boing! Thud!

Somewhere in the Great Plains, the kids caught what
has been described to the next generation as a kangaroo rat. They
imprisoned it in a box and brought it along for much-needed
entertainment. Inexplicably, it wasn’t very playful, electing to
jam itself into a corner of its confinement and sulk.

When the novelty of the rodent wore off, Martha and Kenneth
began to bicker again. Uncle Harry distracted them with a generous
offer to pay a penny for every two gray hairs they could find and
pull out of his head. They greedily inspected every lock of Harry’s
black hair, enthusiastically jerking out the gray hairs. Harry was
a young man, and soon he was surprised at how many gray hairs the
kids found. But when they ran low on gray hairs, the zealous little
wage-earners simply began pulling black hair. Soon, Harry got
wise and began demanding to view the gray hairs before he would
pay. Kenneth was baffled at first, but Martha quickly evolved a new strategy: She’d pull two black hairs, so
Harry felt the tweaks, then show him two gray hairs she’d pulled
before. When Harry finally realized that he was seeing the same two
gray hairs again and again, he politely insisted that she stop.
There may have been some words spoken about honesty being the best
policy. Humiliated and disgraced, Martha huddled in a corner of the
back seat.

But now, while Martha sulked, Kenneth was somehow finding gray
hairs again, and turning them over and getting paid. Martha, sullen
and suspicious, tried to puzzle out what he was doing, and soon
spotted Kenneth’s trick. He’d pull two black hairs from Harry’s
head, reach into the box, pull two pale hairs out of the kangaroo
rat’s tail and give them to Harry. The kangaroo rat, already
despondent about being captured, boxed and taken for a ride,
simply crouched and endured.

When Martha figured out what Kenneth was doing, she indignantly
grabbed for the rat. That was it for the rat, who finally
decided it was time to bite somebody. Martha shrieked and yanked
her hand — with kangaroo rat attached — out of the box, sending
it flying across the car. “Help, help!” she screamed. “My Land!”
screamed my grandfather, swerving. “Jack, Jack, watch the road!”
screamed my grandmother. “No fair!” screamed Kenneth.

They pulled over. By this time the kangaroo rat was under the
seat in hysterics, so they got out, opened the doors and waited
for it to emerge. This didn’t happen for a long time, perhaps
because Kenneth took this rare chance to pogo — along the shoulder
of the road. Boing! Thud! Boing! Thud! Boing! Thud! After
about half an hour the kangaroo rat shot out and disappeared into
the desert, where, presumably, all its hair grew back snow-white.

This incident made my grandmother realize that distracting the
kids was a matter of life and death. She got them started on word
games. But they were soon bored with spotting license plates and
playing “I love my love with an A because she is Adorable, I hate
my love with an A because she is Awful …” They began playing a
game based on the following ancient folk tune:

If I had a million dollars

I know what I would do

I’d buy a million packets of pins

And stick them all in you

Ha ha

The game was to construct variations:

If I had a million dollars

I know what I would do

I’d buy 10,000 pogo sticks

And bounce them over you

Ha ha

This provided such a good outlet for savagery that the family
arrived in California intact. Today, Martha (my mother) and Kenneth
(my uncle) are on excellent terms, if you discount the occasional
ice cube dropped down the collar. In collective memory, the 11-day
car trip to California is a golden time — the worst of road trips,
the best of road trips. Although my mother would never let me get
a pogo stick.

Continue Reading Close

Don't call me Mom

Why do people get all creeped out that my children call me by my first name?

  • more
    • All Share Services

Naturally I worry about mobs with torches and pitchforks showing up at my door some stormy night to let me know they’re uncomfortable
with my little ways. Who doesn’t? Yet I think for most of us it’s
a vague, undefined worry — a nagging sense that high school was
not just a passing aberration, but a glimpse into the furthest
fastnesses of the human soul. In my case, I know exactly what’s
going to be bothering them, and it’s not going to be my experiments
in creating new life down in the dungeon, or my scheme to overthrow
the world with the aid of alien invaders disguised as
telemarketers, or even injudicious things I may have said about the
War on Drugs. No, what they’re going to be all creeped out about
is the fact that my children don’t call me Mom.

There’s worse. I like to feel that my life has not been wholly
routine, that I have a few unusual experiences and original
thoughts to recount. But it turns out that I could have paraglided
from the top of Everest clutching an anthrax bomb to my bosom to
save the world from an Eskimo conspiracy to trigger a new Ice Age
and that would not strike most people as being anywhere near as
riveting as my habit of not calling my parents Mom and Dad.

Yes, it’s true. I call my parents by their names and I always have and I have no idea why. They claim not to be able to remember why they decided to raise us that way. Maybe it was an academic-circles left-wing Beat-era thing, how would I know? It seemed
perfectly natural to me.

But no matter how brilliant one’s child-rearing ideas are, the fly in the ointment is always the children’s Ghastly Little Peers.
Kids, with their shining-eyed honesty, are always the first to ask,
“What kind of name is that?” “What’s wrong with your skin?” “Is
it true you’re different and should be ostracized, hunted down and
stoned?” and in my case, “How come you don’t call your mom and dad
Mom and Dad?”

My own Ghastly Little Peers also had searching philosophical
questions like, “How come you don’t go to church?” “How come your
father has a beard?” and “How can she be your mother and your
sister?” (OK, I made that one up.) But nothing shocked people like my
calling my parents by their names. Apparently it seemed wrong,
icky, disrespectful, show-offy, sick.

After a few years I started replying, “I just do. How come you call your parents by their titles? They don’t call you ‘child,’ do they?” This attempt at frank and open discussion was generally met with hostile silence.

There were years of this. Once out of high school, it became less of an issue. It didn’t seem so shocking to my Peers to hear an
older person addressed by name, or maybe people had learned to keep more of the searching philosophical questions to themselves. Or else they were hoping to stop calling their own parents Mom and Dad.

When I got pregnant, the Mom issue came rushing back in an all-new form. Almost every maternity nurse I’ve met and almost every ob-gyn tries to put expectant parents at ease by referring to them as moms and dads, often addressing them directly: “Mom, put your feet in these stirrups.” “Dad, you wait here with these back issues of TV Guide.”

The more ghastly the thing they want you to do, the more babyish
their mode of address. “Now, Mommy, we want you to take off all
your clothes, get on this treadmill and drink ipecac while these
medical students take notes, OK, Mommykins?” The comeback, I suppose, is, “Drink it yourself, Sonny,” or “Think
again, little Missy.” But it always takes me a few years to
compose my comebacks.

- – - – - – - – - -

Far from being a rebel against tradition, I am tradition’s little
wannabe and that is why my own children call me by my name. It is
still what seems natural to me. It causes some people to guess
that I am a stepmother rather than a mother — why else would they
not call me Mom? — but that’s easy enough to clear up. My kids say they find the queries of their peers annoying but not traumatic. Perhaps they are simply shielding me, since I am so sensitive.

Yet strangers persist in referring to me as a mom, or even — at
the pediatrician’s office, for example — addressing me as Mom.
Being called Mom by someone who is not my child is an unwarranted
familiarity. And in my case, since even my children don’t call me
Mom, it’s like someone who calls you by the wrong nickname –
Willy, when your friends call you Bill; Brucie-Boy, when your
friends call you the Boss; Bimbo, when your friends call you Posh
Spice: It is an erroneous familiarity.*

But even more than the phony familiarity, I object to the assumption of uniformity, the assumption that there’s only one way to be, only one thing a child could call its mother. I suspect that the step after that is the assumption that uniformity is natural and good: We’re all alike in this — and we should be all alike — what kind of cold, unloving monster doesn’t let her children call her Mom?

Moms are easily stereotyped, something that’s no more welcome to
people whose children call them Mom than it is to me. I’ve met
some who accept the stereotyping in the hopes of fighting it, or
even of gaining the clout of numbers. Women who proclaim, “I’m a
soccer mom and I’m not ashamed of it” are trying to reclaim an
epithet that has been used with an insulting tone. Yeah, I’m
black, is there a problem with that? Grrrl Power! Dead white
males, unite! We’re here, we’re queer, get used to it! Soccer
moms are people too!

I resent the stereotype. I resent enforced Momdom the way I
resent those ghastly mass-produced flags for the home that have
swept the country in recent years, with their colorful bunnies and
autumn leaves and pineapples (ancient symbol of hospitality).

I hate those flags because they are insipid, because they look like mall decorations, but mostly because they are so riddled with
cheesy assumptions about how we all think alike at any given time.
It’s December! Our thoughts turn to snowmen! Even if it doesn’t
snow here and we’ve never made a snowman in our lives! It’s
spring! Our thoughts turn to tulips! Even if we dislike tulips!
It’s mid-March! Our thoughts turn to leprechauns! Even if we’re
not Irish! Or even if we’re Irish and despise leprechauns! Even
if our religion teaches that leprechauns are satanic! It’s no
particular time of year! Our thoughts turn to pineapples! Even if
pineapples cause our loved ones to turn red, swell up and grope
their way to the phone to dial 911! Smile!

No doubt there are flags for Mother’s Day, and no doubt they say
“Mom.”

Continue Reading Close

Can you hold? I've got sobbing on Line 2

Working from a home office means trying to keep your professional image intact while your kids yell, "You big sucky poophead!" in the background.

  • more
    • All Share Services

You’re on the telephone, pouring a worldview or a set of bold ideas or an image through the wires. You’re calling from home, but you haven’t mentioned this, in case it detracts from your mesmerizing gestalt. Such is your persuasiveness, your urgency, your snake-oil sincerity, that the person at the other end of the line, you sense, is impressed, is buying into it, wants a piece, has a certain mental picture of you. In this mental picture you are ensconced at a big oak desk — or an angular metal and thick green glass desk — in a large, luxurious office, perhaps a penthouse suite. From your panoramic windows there is a view of something damp — river, bay or fountain. The listener also intuits your polished personal appearance, your chic yet appropriate clothing.

Abruptly, young Fuchsia comes into the room. “Is ‘shut up’ a bad word?” she asks. You motion her away and clutch the telephone closer. Just a little longer and the party at the other end of the line will be won over, will offer you a job, will buy your idea, will convert to your religion, will sponsor your legislation.

“Boomer told me to shut up!” Fuchsia says, louder. “That’s a bad word, isn’t it? He called me a tattle-tale.”

“You have a lot of experience in this area?” the person on the phone asks. With growing alarm, you hear Boomer approaching. “Can I play with the blender?” he is asking. “Do you want me to sing a song?”

Now, having children is no disgrace. Living in the same house with your children is no disgrace. Calling from home should be no disgrace. And yet. Somehow. It interferes with the impression you want to convey at this exact moment.

Stay very cool. Rather than allow the glorious picture of yourself to crumble, now is the time to add a new dimension to the sprawling office suite — flunkies, lackeys and underlings, even a squad of eager, incredibly well-connected interns, dashing in and out on errands you have assigned them.

As Boomer opens his mouth to sing, as Fuchsia begins to turn savagely upon him (“You big sucky poophead!”), you must act. In a calm voice, say, “Pardon me a moment.” Turn to the children, and say loudly and firmly, “Trump, I don’t want to see those documents until you clear it with Mitsubishi.” Glare. Say, “Excellent, DuPont, have it embossed.” Shake your fist.

Get back on the phone. Gracefully acknowledge the interruption. Say, “Utter chaos around here.” Say, “Deadline.” Say, “Things are a little hectic. Quarterly report.”

“Screening tonight.”

“Grant renewals.”

“Launch at 0800.”

“Venezuela’s more work than all the rest put together.”

For sometimes in this imperfect world, it’s necessary to put on a front. Not to disclose your inmost being. To seem like someone calling from the executive suite at the Tri-State Headquarters of a monolith rather than from a warm, intellectually rich family home inhabited by extremely spirited children. This is why it’s particularly useful to name your children things like DuPont, Rockefeller or Mitsubishi instead of Fuchsia and Boomer. You may have neglected to take this precaution, but it’s not too late. Children often enjoy changing their names. Convince them that Trump is an unusual and prestigious nickname for Fuchsia, that even on the playground Rothschild cuts a bigger swath than Boomer.

Remember, your children are on your side. Success for you means more circus tickets for them. Explain it to them. “The evil, outdated system tries to make workers and innovators like Mommy and Daddy act as if they don’t even have families, but we’ll show them, right? We’ll twist their distorted assumptions against them, won’t we? OK — you’re DuPont, she’s Trump.”

Continue Reading Close

Reluctant role model

Reluctant role model -- my classmates wanted to hear 'It's easy to combine kids and graduate school'

  • more
    • All Share Services

In graduate school, I was the only student with kids, though a few others were married. This made me a fascinating specimen.

“You have a kid?” my classmates would query.

“Kids. Yeah.”

Kids? How many?”

“Oh, only two.”

“Two! That’s a lot!”

“Sometimes it seems like a lot,” I’d agree.

“So you’re going to grad school and you have two kids!” they’d exclaim.

“Yeah, and I commute almost an hour,” I’d say, craving pity.

“And you’re doing so well!” they’d say.

“Well …” Before I could continue, they’d shout, “That’s so great!” and change the subject. I gradually understood that no one wanted to pity me. They wanted to admire me. Specifically, they wanted to admire the tremendous ease with which I combined grad school and children.

What tremendous ease? I was at my wit’s end. But that no one wanted to hear. Easy, they wanted to hear. “It’s easy! You can do it all, and it’s easy, watch me.” That’s what I was supposed to say. Possible, I might have said, it’s possible. Rough, though. But no one would listen to that.

“She has two kids!” they’d cry, pointing me out as an inspirational text. “Two!” You could see the highly colored thoughts whirling in their heads: Jackpot! If she can do it, I can do it. If she can combine grad school and kids, I’ll be able to combine work and kids. It’ll be OK. (Here I have to issue a qualification. Only my female classmates reacted this way. Male classmates generally contented themselves with asking the kids’ ages, perhaps going so far as to comment, “That’s cool.”) Female classmates occasionally risked a question. My husband and I shared housework, right? Right. Sometimes I’d point out that because we were both irrationally busy, the shared housework we actually performed was minimal.

Compared to my classmates, we dwelt in squalor. They lived in studios or shared apartments, with their sparse possessions elegantly arranged on improvised shelves or artistically stored in baskets. The centerpieces of their living spaces tended to be desks, idiosyncratically and reverently arranged to suit their work habits.

We lived in (rented) houses or flats. Our abundant but worthless possessions were everywhere, often strewn on the floor or jammed into closets. The centerpiece of our home was generally a series of quivering junk piles the children swore were art projects. My desk was heaped with things my husband had dumped when he despaired of finding another place for them. Key tools of my trade — pens, paper, insulting notes from editors — were missing, probably imbedded in an art project somewhere. When I’d mention this, my classmates would dismiss it out of hand. Sure, they’d agree, sometimes you gotta let housework slide a little. Skip polishing the brass. Let the brilliants on the chandelier get dusty. Put the napkins away without ironing. Only if they chanced to visit my house could they grasp the true dimensions of the chaos. Busy as we were, I seldom entertained, and so they rarely came over to behold the grimy, pockmarked underbelly of having it all.

Their blithe reassurances made me think of a book on pregnancy and childbirth I was given before my daughter was born. A chapter for husbands advised them to be tolerant and overlook the dust bunnies under the coffee table. Ha! Our house had dust bunnies without number, dust armadillos, dust bison. Grease bunnies. Mildew bunnies. It was hard to locate the coffee table, let alone get at the dust hyenas cackling underneath. (This is a thing of the past. Today our dwelling is a space that might be featured in Sunset or HG — a showplace of wry elegance and simplicity. We keep it immaculate, accenting the decor with rotating selections from our art collection. But let’s have dinner at your place.)

If my classmates didn’t want to believe that housework was a problem, there was no way I could convince them that things like spending time alone with one’s spouse, reading books or seeing friends could be problems. Willing or not, I was forced to be an inspiration.

Now that I’ve graduated, I spend more time among people who also have children, people who arrive at work panting, people who rush out of meetings to take calls from day-care providers, people who keep wondering if they have mono — there must be some reason why they’re so tired all the time. They want different role models. “It’s easy!” is the last thing they want to hear.

They like to hear about the charge of the dust bison, because they have dust fauna too. They want to know they’re not the only ones. In fact, they’d like to hear that my husband and I are worse slobs than they are. If I’m at my wit’s end, they want to know. Gory details are appreciated. The more I can’t cope, the more competent they feel. I am an inspiration once again.

Continue Reading Close

Page 7 of 7 in Susan McCarthy