Susan Shapiro

“The Boxer’s Heart” by Kate Sekules

Bloodied, bruised and elated, one woman offers an elegant account of her love affair with boxing.

  • more
    • All Share Services

“I like it here in the gym because everyone’s a bit damaged,” says Kate Sekules in her brave and ballsy new memoir. “The Boxer’s Heart” chronicles how a pretty, pacifistic 35-year-old London-born bookworm wound up stepping through the ropes at Philadelphia’s Blue Horizon arena in February 1997 to bloody an opponent, nicknamed Raging Belle, in a bout billed as “the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre.”

Sekules traces her intense (albeit short-lived) career as a professional fighter back to 1992, when the moderately athletic freelance writer took an aerobic boxing class at the Crosby Street Studio in Manhattan. The first time she threw a punch, she was hooked. She was soon training at Gleason’s Gym, “the oldest operating fight gym in the United States,” which had produced 88 champions. In the early 1980s, according to Sekules, Gleason’s attracted an interesting female crowd that included choreographer Twyla Tharp, who based a season’s dances on “the sweet science,” fashion designer Diane Von Furstenberg, whose famous wrap dress was inspired by boxer’s robes, and Joyce Carol Oates, whose book “On Boxing” Sekules angrily takes to task for snubbing female boxers.

As her interest grew, Sekules discovered an underground history of women in the brutal sport. She shares some colorful details, including evidence of female boxing matches in London as early as 1722. She writes about an Irish girl named Polly Burns, a female challenger in a carnival boxing booth who was the subject of the documentary “My Grandmother Was a Boxer”; a 1920s Flint, Mich., subculture of stenographer-pugilists called “The Buster’s Club,” which was banned from the YMCA; and Barbara Buttrick, the first woman inducted into the Boxing Hall of Fame in 1945, when the 15-year-old from a small town in Yorkshire stood 4-foot-6.

Currently an editor at Food & Wine magazine, Sekules also dissects her lifelong issues with her body and explains how boxing helped improve her self image, giving her the chance to fight “the weight obsession as opposed to the weight.” Her fighting weight is 147, making her a welterweight with, she brags, only 12 percent body fat. Yet being fit isn’t all that matters in the ring. She describes in blow-by-blow, stream of consciousness detail her two losing bouts. Though she doesn’t give up, she gets the shit kicked out of her, winding up bloodied and bruised. Happily, after the “St. Valentine’s Day Massacre” she finds out that she’s broken Raging Belle’s nose.

Though the fight scenes are funny and painful at the same time, the emotional search that culminated in Sekules’ passion for boxing is more compelling. Some of the reasons she offers for being drawn to boxing seem facile: She grew up a tomboy who hated dolls and pink, her family was repressed, she wanted a nonlinear career, she was pissed off at the world. Luckily, she digs deeper, analyzing the kind of people who use their damaged psyches in this “concrete and practical way.” “To be able to hit without compulsion,” she says provocatively, “it helps to have been hit yourself when you were too young to retaliate.”

Though she doesn’t discuss physical abuse from her childhood, Sekules was hit by some powerful incongruities. In 1979, just before her 18th birthday, her father died. She soon discovered his hidden history: He was Jewish and had been sent to England on the last Kindertransport out of Austria after his father killed himself. Sekules’ mother was raised Lutheran in Germany by a father who was a Nazi. When she was 17, he abandoned the family, her brother was shot and her mother killed herself. “I’d figured out,” Sekules says, that “to have as parents a converted, ashamed Jew and a Nazi once removed, living in postwar German-hating Britain, each carrying the grief and guilt of a parental suicide, was a shaky foundation.” No wonder she came out swinging!

The commercial women’s boxing world that Sekules details lends a certain flashy appeal to “The Boxer’s Heart,” and it’s especially timely given the recent popularity of female combat: female wrestlers, the movies “Girlfight” and “Shadow Boxers” and the much-hyped match between Laila Ali and Jacqui Frazier-Lyde, the daughters of Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier. Yet ultimately, the internal chaos that prompts Sekules’ rage and desire to retaliate is a more original, fascinating place to visit than any gym. “I find it paradoxically relaxing,” she writes about preparing for one fight, “to have all my nameless, floating anxieties serried together in one solid front of realistic dread.” Now that Sekules has hung up her gloves, one looks forward to reading the next phase of her battle.

So Forth

Susan Shapiro reviews "So Forth" by Joseph Brodsky.

  • more
    • All Share Services

This final, posthumous book of poetry by Joseph Brodsky, the Nobel Prize winner and former poet laureate of the U.S., is by far his most intimate and confessional. This is Brodsky’s third collection in English — he published seven earlier books in the Soviet Union, from where he immigrated to this country as an involuntary exile in 1972. While his self-translations are uneven and at times overly academic, a deeply personal tone takes hold in “So Forth” and nearly sweeps the reader away with its expertly evoked sadness and nostalgia.

The best of these poems, which first appeared in The New Yorker, New York Times, and The New Republic, show Auden’s influence in their simplicity of language, their rhymes and their infusion of deceptively innocent emotion. In the graceful, lovely poem “A Song,” Brodsky says: “I wish you were here, dear,/ I wish you were here. I wish I knew no astronomy/ when stars appear./ When the moon skims the water/ that sighs and shifts in its slumber./ I wish it were still a quarter/ to dial your number.” The poem acquires new meaning and poignancy when you realize, in the last stanza, that the “you” has died.

“So Forth,” which Brodsky dedicates to “my wife and daughter,” includes a bewitching dream poem called “In Memory of My Father: Australia,” in which the ghost of a father who died in a crematorium says simply: “Looks like I’ve lost my slippers.” The poem ends: “better these snatches of voice, this patchwork/ monologue of a recluse trying to play a genie/ for the first time since you formed a cloud above a chimney.” Though it could be interpreted as anyone’s father, the direct address and longing for a family connection are undeniably close and moving.

In this collection’s most gentle and moving poem, “To My Daughter,” Brodsky seems to anticipate his death while saying goodbye to his baby girl. He writes, “On the whole, bear in mind that I’ll be around. Or rather,/ that an inanimate object might be your father … / you may still remember a silhouette, a contour/ while I’ll lose even that, along with the other luggage./ Hence, these somewhat wooden lines in our common language.” Of course, these lines aren’t wooden at all — they show a newfound warmth and accessibility. They’re the work of a gifted poet who learned to transcend all political and language barriers and speak in the universal language of heart and mind.

Continue Reading Close

Journals

Susan Shapiro reviews Keith Haring's book "Journals".

  • more
    • All Share Services

Talking about art is never as interesting as the art itself.

Keith Haring’s journals begin in 1977, when he was in high school in Pittsburgh, excited that he bought tickets for a Grateful Dead concert for $5.50 each. The last entry is from 1989, right before he died of AIDS at the age of 31, by which time he had become a world-famous artist. In between there are poems, photographs, letters, dreams, critiques of other artists, insecurities, unpublished drawings from his notebooks, lists, calendars, quotes from Graham Nash, John Keats and Walt Whitman, mentions of sex and AIDS and such philosophical babble as “The freedom of the artist is symbolic of the human spirit in all mankind.”

Haring’s journals are more introspective, analytic and soulful than his mentor Andy Warhol’s superficial, celebrity-studded diaries. Fans of Haring’s works, the best-known of which feature colorful primitive figures dancing, will no doubt enjoy reading about his world travels, his public and private shows, and his intimate connections with Warhol, Timothy Leary and William Burroughs. Yet Haring was a visual artist, not a writer, and making paintings is not an inherently exciting topic. (“Fill in color inside the black shapes — one color at a time. Very ‘Cobra’ brushwork and very drippy. Finish around 9:30 with back hurting and smelling bad …”) It’s ironic that, for someone whose work seemed so free and spontaneous, the journals reveal the intensive planning, toil and clear agenda that went into Haring’s work and image.

Although Robert Ferris Thompson’s introduction is well-written and informative, one wishes for more linear biographical information. Thompson quotes a friend who said that Haring was “the nicest person he ever met in his life,” and indeed it’s refreshing to find an artist who talks of his love of children, concern for humanity and donations to charity. Haring comes off as vulnerable and human. In his brief but poignant preface, the artist David Hockney perhaps sums up Haring best when he writes, “He left his mark everywhere. A very generous life.”

Continue Reading Close

The Art Fair

Susan Shapiro reviews "The Art Fair" by David Lipsky.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Writing well is the best revenge. Just ask David Lipsky, whose divorced mother Pat Lipsky is a well-known Manhattan abstract painter. “The Art Fair,” Lipsky’s eloquent coming-of-age-in-Soho saga, is about Richard Freeley, whose divorced mother Joan Freeley is a well-known Manhattan abstract painter. Yet this engaging autobiographical first novel is anything but abstract. With subtle strokes and sudden blasts of color, “The Art Fair” brilliantly sends up the New York art scene.

The story chronicles the lives of Richard and Joan, as they navigate the treacherous and back-stabbing art world. Critics, dealers and artists first proclaim Joan a genius, then eject her from favor. Richard becomes his depressed mother’s confidant, advisor and escort to art openings. He has a wonderful gift for cool observation: “Brie was packed into my veins, my muscles, my brain,” he says. “For three years, it seemed I lived on Brie, and even now, when I eat the cool, slimy food, I look around for fear that I am being judged ungenerously.”

Art world insiders will have a field day matching fiction with fact. The character Celia Kapplestein, for instance, suspiciously resembles artist Helen Frankenthaler. Artist Neil Hollender is Ken Nolland’s twin and the snobbish art critic Ernest Steinman, the scotch-drinking, Camel-smoking elder statesman of art criticism, is a shoe-in for Clement Greenberg. The Freddy Beaumont gallery is the Bob Miller gallery and the Gregor Krumlich gallery appears to be the Emmerich gallery on 57th Street.

Aside from spilling art world secrets, Lipsky is also sophisticated enough to toss in deft allusions to John Updike, whose first novel was “The Poorhouse Fair.” Updike’s “Too Far to Go” told of the Maples — a couple named Richard and Joan — just like the mother and father in Lipsky’s current fiction. The thirty-year-old Lipsky, also the author of a short story collection (“Three Thousand Dollars”) and a work of nonfiction (“Late Bloomers”), closes his poignant novel at a weekend art fair upstate, where his mother triumphs. Yet, says Richard, “it had never occurred to me that this would be the result of success — that she would need me no longer and I would have to find a place somewhere else.” Lipsky has clearly found his own canvas — on the page.

Continue Reading Close