<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tim Grieve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/tim_grieve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A farewell note</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/last_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/last_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/28/last_post</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some 4,000 posts later, this one will be my last.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three years ago, I took over War Room from my friend and editor Geraldine Sealey. Some 4,000 posts later, this one will be my last. I'm leaving Salon for Politico, where I've accepted a job as congressional bureau chief. </p><p>Alex Koppelman will be taking over War Room. </p><p>I want to thank Salon for giving me the freedom to do what I've been doing here. More important, I want to thank you, the readers, for making the work feel so worthwhile. I'll miss our dialogue -- even the <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2004/06/25/frank_exchange/index.html">frank exchanges</a> -- and I wish you all the best. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/last_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/last_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;ll take that as a &#8220;no&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/perino_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/perino_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/28/perino</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the run-up to Bush's last State of the Union address, his press secretary ponders whether the country is better off than it was seven years ago.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At today's White House press gaggle, devoted almost entirely to George W. Bush's final State of the Union address, a reporter asked Dana Perino a simple yes-or-no question: "Is the country better off now than seven years ago?" </p><p>Here's how she answered: </p><p>"Certainly seven years ago -- well, seven years ago, right before September 11th, I think that people would say that the country certainly felt better off. There's been -- once we were confronted with terrorists who would fly jumbo jets into buildings and kill thousands of our citizens in an instant, it created a sense of fear and nervousness about our security. And that's why the president decided to take on the terrorists head on and go on the offense. </p><p>"And we have done that around the world. We have been successful so far in preventing another attack on our country. But it's not for their lack of trying. And that's another reason why the president -- tonight you'll hear him call on Congress to pass the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act reauthorization. They have until Friday to do that, and the president sees no reason why they shouldn't be able to get that done." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/perino_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/perino_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Edwards&#8217; &#8220;path to the nomination&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/edwards_20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/edwards_20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/28/edwards</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He'd be a contender if only someone else would drop out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_edwards/">John Edwards</a> campaign has just distributed a new "interested parties" memo. Its subject line is "Path to the nomination," and we were looking forward to reading the rest: Having not yet won a state, having lost badly in first-in-the-South South Carolina and trailing far behind in the delegate count, how can Edwards win the Democratic presidential nomination? </p><p>We've read the memo, and we're still not sure. </p><p>The "path to the nomination" seems to be as much of a hope as it is a plan. The Edwards campaign says an "online fundraising boom" has left it on "solid financial footing," but it understates Edwards' delegate deficit by focusing only on the delegates won in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina and by ignoring the super-delegates who have already aligned themselves with a candidate. By the Edwards campaign's way of counting, Barack Obama leads the delegate count with 63, followed by Hillary Clinton at 48 and Edwards at 26. By <a>CNN's tally,</a> Clinton has 230, Obama has 152 and Edwards has just 61. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/edwards_20/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/edwards_20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rezko arrest rains on the Obama parade</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/rezko_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/rezko_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/28/rezko</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Already under indictment on fraud charges, longtime Obama supporter is taken into custody.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not all good news for Barack Obama: Longtime Obama supporter <a href="/politics/war_room/2008/01/25/rezko/">Tony Rezko,</a> already under indictment on fraud charges, was reportedly <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-rezko-arrested_webjan29,0,6857272.story">arrested</a> today on an alleged bond violation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/rezko_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/rezko_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endorsing Obama, Kennedy goes after the Clintons</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/kennedy_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/kennedy_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/28/kennedy_obama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kennedy says that Obama will be ready on "Day 1."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Sen. Ted Kennedy endorsed <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/barack_obama/">Barack Obama</a> today, he also made it clear why he's not endorsing Hillary Clinton. </p><p>Although Kennedy called Clinton a "friend" and said she has been "at the forefront on issues ranging from healthcare to the rights of women around the world," he also made a number of not-so-veiled stabs at the Clintons. Kennedy said that Obama refuses to be "trapped in the patterns of the past," that he "cares passionately about the causes he believes in without demonizing those who hold a different view," that he's "tough-minded" but "also has an uncommon capacity to appeal to the better angels of our nature." </p><p>While Bill Clinton has argued that Obama's record on Iraq is far more mixed than Obama has suggested, Kennedy said that the voters know "the truth" about the matter. Kennedy stole one of the Clinton campaign's lines -- ready to lead on "Day 1" -- and applied it to Obama. And then, equating Obama with his late brother, Kennedy reminded the overflow crowd at American University that another former Democratic president -- Harry Truman -- once urged John F. Kennedy to "be patient" about seeking the White House.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/kennedy_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/kennedy_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama overflow</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/obama_33/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/obama_33/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/28/obama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The campaign turns away thousands in Washington.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Our concept this morning:</b> Experience Barack Obama's rally with Ted Kennedy in Washington as a "civilian" would. </p><p><b>Our reality this morning:</b> After standing outdoors for more than two hours in a line that stretched along several blocks -- and eventually getting within 20 feet of the entrance doors -- we were told that the roughly 6,000-seat Bender Auditorium at American University was completely full. At least several thousand people were in line behind us. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/obama_33/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/obama_33/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So we&#8217;ve got that going for us</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/mccain_33/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/mccain_33/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/28/mccain</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John McCain promises there will be "other wars."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_mccain/">John McCain</a> told supporters Sunday that Iraq is a "tough war" that isn't "going to be over right away," then warned: "There's going to be other wars ... I'm sorry to tell you, there's going to be other wars. We will never surrender but there will be other wars." </p><p>As the Huffington Post's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/27/mccain-warns-there-will_n_83459.html">Sam Stein</a> notes, McCain "did not elaborate who the United States would be fighting." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/mccain_33/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/mccain_33/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Et tu, Teddy?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/kennedy_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/kennedy_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/28/kennedy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kennedy to endorse Obama, despite pleas from the former president to remain neutral.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Memo to Bill Clinton: Yes, <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/064892.php">Jesse Jackson</a> won South Carolina in 1984 and 1988, but Jackson never won the state by a landslide in a fiercely fought contest there; never won the state when the state's results really mattered; and never was a serious contender for the Democratic nomination. </p><p>Oh, and Mr. President? Jackson never had Ted Kennedy's endorsement, either. </p><p>Kennedy will endorse <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/barack_obama/">Barack Obama</a> this morning during a rally at American University in Washington, and this one's got to hurt. As the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/01/27/ST2008012702331.html?hpid=topnews">Washington Post</a> reports, Hillary Clinton sought Kennedy's endorsement for months, and her husband appealed to Kennedy "in recent days to at least remain neutral." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/kennedy_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/28/kennedy_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turnout high in South Carolina</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/election_day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/election_day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/26/election_day</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edwards says there's an "opportunity for a surprise."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats were predicting a record turnout in today's South Carolina primary -- on balance, probably a good thing for Barack Obama -- and voting patterns so far are pointing in that direction. </p><p><a href="http://thestatecom.typepad.com/ygatoday/">The State</a> is using words like "good," "strong" and "heavy" to describe turnout, which would be a dramatic change from last week's Republican primary, where bad weather and a lack of enthusiasm put a lid on the percentage of eligible voters who actually voted. The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/26/us/politics/26cnd-carolina.html?_r=1&amp;ref=politics&amp;oref=slogin">New York Times</a> reports that turnout appears high today in both predominately white and predominately black precincts. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/election_day/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/election_day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pre-spinning South Carolina</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/spin_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/spin_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/26/spin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A memo from the Clinton campaign: Hey, look at Florida!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polls won't close in South Carolina until 7 p.m., but the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/hillary_rodham_clinton/">Hillary Clinton</a> campaign wouldn't mind if we'd just skip over all that and move along to what comes next. In a memo to "interested parties" this afternoon, Clinton campaign communications director Howard Wolfson says that, "Regardless of today's outcome, the race quickly shifts to Florida, where hundreds of thousands of Democrats will turn out to vote on Tuesday." </p><p>Call it Phase II of the Clinton campaign's "Hey, Look Over There" strategy. As you'll recall, the DNC stripped Florida of its delegates to the Democratic National Convention when the state scheduled its primary earlier than the party wanted. That turned Tuesday's Florida primary into the same sort of meaningless affair the Michigan primary was -- at least until Clinton issued a statement Friday in which she said that she'd fight to have delegates from both states seated at the convention after all. </p><p>Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards have all vowed not to campaign in Florida. But in Wolfson's message today, he implies that Obama and Obama alone is blowing off the Sunshine State. "Despite efforts by the Obama campaign to ignore Floridians," Wolfson writes, "their voices will be heard loud and clear across the country, as the last state to vote before Super Tuesday on February 5th." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/spin_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/spin_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The racial divide, then and now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/south_carolina_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/south_carolina_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/26/south_carolina</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As South Carolina goes to the polls, will the media remember the racial polarization of 2004?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Democrats in South Carolina go to the polls today, the mainstream media will be reminding us incessantly that Palmetto state voters are divided among racial lines. </p><p>The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/25/AR2008012503375.html?hpid=topnews">Washington Post</a>, explaining that the "recent focus on has stirred considerable angst" in <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/barack_obama/">Barack Obama's</a> "inner circle," notes that an <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/25383.html">MSNBC-McClatchy Newspaper poll</a> out this week showed a wide racial divide among South Carolina Democrats. Among African-American voters, the poll had Obama at 59 percent, followed by Hillary Clinton at 25 percent and John Edwards at 4 percent. Among white voters, Edwards led with 40 percent, followed by Clinton at 36 percent and Obama at 10 percent. </p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/26/us/politics/26dems.html">New York Times</a> says Obama's strategists "worry" that all the discussion about race has "driven whites away from his candidacy." "If the trend materializes in the voting," the Times says, "his ability to transcend race could come into question and pose complications in the more than 20 states that vote on Feb. 5." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/south_carolina_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/26/south_carolina_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the Day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/quote_38/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/quote_38/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/25/quote</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is John McCain a candidate only his mother could love?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Holding their nose, they're gonna have to take him." -- <a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2007/McCains_mom_gives_GOP_some_straight_0125.html">Roberta McCain,</a> the 95-year-old mother of Sen. <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_mccain/">John McCain,</a> explaining that Republicans are going to make her son their nominee whether they like it or not. The elder McCain suggested that the not-quite-as-elder McCain deserves the support of Republicans because he "worked like a dog" to get George W. Bush reelected.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/quote_38/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/quote_38/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Tony Rezko</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/rezko/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/rezko/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/25/rezko</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A "gotcha" that wasn't for one candidate, a need to "come clean" for another.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/hillary_rodham_clinton/">Hillary Clinton</a> appeared on the "Today" how Friday morning, and Matt Lauer had an <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSVehDX5wL4&amp;eurl=http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2008/01/hillary_on_the_morning_shows_surprised_by_photo_of_her_and_rezko.php">ambush</a> waiting for her. After showing a video clip of Clinton going after Barack Obama for his relationship with "slum landlord" Tony Rezko, Lauer put up an undated photograph of Bill and Hillary Clinton posing with ... Tony Rezko. </p><p>As "gotcha" moments go, it wasn't much of one. </p><p>Someone in Clinton's line of work -- the wife of a governor, a first lady, a senator, a presidential candidate -- poses for photographs with thousands and thousands of people, most of whom she has never met before and will probably never meet again. Unless there's other evidence of a relationship -- as there was, say, when <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1158908,00.html">Time</a> obtained a photograph of Jack Abramoff with George W. Bush -- it's pretty unfair to read anything into a single, undated, context-free grip 'n' grin. As Clinton explained -- and we've got no reason to doubt her -- "I don't know the man, I wouldn't know him if he walked in the door, I don't have a 17-year relationship with him. There's a big difference between standing somewhere taking a picture with someone you don't know and haven't seen since, and having a relationship." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/rezko/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/rezko/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton: I&#8217;ll take those delegates now, thanks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/clinton_29/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/clinton_29/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/25/clinton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She says she'll push to have Florida and Michigan delegations seated at the convention.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Michigan and Florida defied the Democratic National Committee by scheduling their primaries for dates before Feb. 5, the DNC Rules Committee responded by stripping both states of their delegates to the Democratic National Convention. </p><p>Most of the Democratic presidential candidates pulled their names off the ballot in Michigan, but <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/hillary_rodham_clinton/">Hillary Clinton</a> didn't. And now that she has won in Michigan -- she beat "uncommitted" by 15 percentage points -- she says she's going to fight to have the delegates from both Michigan and Florida seated at the convention. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/clinton_29/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/clinton_29/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s to blame for the race politics?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/huckabee_27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/huckabee_27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/25/huckabee</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One leading Democrat says it's ... Mike Huckabee.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who injected racial politics into the Democratic presidential race in South Carolina? Well, it was <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/mike_huckabee/">Mike Huckabee,</a> of course. </p><p>So says South Carolina Democratic Rep. James Clyburn. </p><p>On MSNBC Friday morning, Joe Scarborough noted that race has taken "center stage" in the run-up to the South Carolina primary, then asked Clyburn: "Do you think the scars of what's been said over the past week will continue, or do you think we can move beyond this?" </p><p>Clyburn's response: "Well, I hope we can get beyond that. But, you know, Joe -- I don't want to sound disingenuous here -- but, you know, we were doing well with this whole issue. Coming out of New Hampshire, [Barack] Obama had the support of both of the congresspeople from New Hampshire, both of whom are white, one male, one female. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/huckabee_27/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/huckabee_27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russert 1, McCain 0</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/mccain_31/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/mccain_31/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/25/mccain</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a debate moderator says you said it, you probably did.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Memo to presidential candidates: When a debate moderator tells you you've said something, then looks down at a piece of paper and reads your words back to you, there's a pretty good chance a) that you've said it, and b) that someone will find proof. </p><p>At Thursday night's <a href="/news/feature/2008/01/25/gop_debate/">GOP presidential debate</a> in Florida, Tim Russert turned to Sen. <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_mccain/">John McCain</a> and said: "You have said repeatedly, quote, 'I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues. I still need to be educated.' Is it a problem for your campaign that the economy is now the most important issue, one that by your own acknowledgment you're not well versed on?" </p><p>McCain's response: "Actually, I don't know where you got that quote from." </p><p>Well, Senator, maybe he got it <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007600">here,</a> where you told the Wall Street Journal: "I'm going to be honest: I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues. I still need to be educated." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/mccain_31/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/mccain_31/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the NYT primary, it&#8217;s Clinton and McCain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/24/times</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Times says Clinton's experience beats the excitement of Obama. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times has just published its endorsements for the two parties' presidential nominees: <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/hillary_rodham_clinton/">Hillary Clinton</a> for the Democrats and <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_mccain/">John McCain</a> for the Republicans. </p><p>In the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/opinion/25fri1.html">Democratic</a> race, the Times' editorial board says the experience Clinton brings trumps the excitement Barack Obama offers. "The potential upside of a great Obama presidency is enticing, but this country faces huge problems, and will no doubt be facing more that we can't foresee," the Times says. "The next president needs to start immediately on challenges that will require concrete solutions, resolve, and the ability to make government work. Mrs. Clinton is more qualified, right now, to be president." </p><p>The Times' editorial board is more enthusiastic about Clinton than it is about the campaign she is running. "As strongly as we back her candidacy," the Times says, "we urge Mrs. Clinton to take the lead in changing the tone of the campaign. It is not good for the country, the Democratic Party or for Mrs. Clinton, who is often tagged as divisive, in part because of bitter feeling about her husband's administration and the so-called permanent campaign." The Times warns that "Bill Clinton's overheated comments are feeding those resentments, and could do long-term damage to [his wife's] candidacy if he continues this way." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/times/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Setting the South Carolina bar</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/southcarolina/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/southcarolina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/24/southcarolina</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinton, Obama campaigns play the expectations game.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than a dozen polls released so far this month have <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/barack_obama/">Barack Obama</a> leading <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/hillary_rodham_clinton/">Hillary Clinton</a> in South Carolina, despite the fact that Clinton's surrogate campaigner in chief has made a substantial investment in the Palmetto State. </p><p>So what's left to do before Saturday's primary? Set the expectations and pre-spin the results -- and both the Clinton campaign and the Obama campaign are already doing both. </p><p>In an "interested parties" memo distributed today, the Obama campaign made the point that Clinton's campaign has gone "all out to win in South Carolina." The memo lists predictions of victory in South Carolina from the Clinton campaign, TV ads purchased in South Carolina by the Clinton campaign, consultants hired in South Carolina by the Clinton campaign and appearances in South Carolina by Bill and Hillary Clinton. The point: Deny the Clinton campaign the ability to spin away a loss Saturday by claiming that it never really tried to win in South Carolina anyway. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/southcarolina/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/southcarolina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mission unaccomplished</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/binladen_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/binladen_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/24/binladen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Osama bin Laden outlast the presidency of George W. Bush?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In an <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,325234,00.html">interview</a> with Fox News, <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/george_w_bush">George W. Bush</a> -- who once talked of capturing Osama bin Laden <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010917-3.html">"dead or alive"</a> -- seems to acknowledge that the United States may not capture the al-Qaida leader before the end of the president's term in office. </p><p>"If we could find the cave he is in, I promise you -- he would be brought to justice or wherever he's hiding," Bush tells Fox. "I will have left behind a mechanism -- and a structure for the next president to better protect America." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/binladen_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/binladen_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain: Clinton would &#8220;surrender&#8221; in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/mccain_30/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/mccain_30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/24/mccain</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["If we do what she wants to do ... al-Qaida will tell the world that they've defeated the United States of America."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appearing on "Fox and Friends" this morning, GOP presidential candidate <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_mccain/">John McCain</a> accused <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/hillary_rodham_clinton/">Hillary Clinton</a> of wanting the U.S. to "surrender" to al-Qaida in Iraq. </p><p>"I've been paying attention to ... the Democrat debate the last couple of days," McCain said. "And I've got to tell you, I am absolutely astonished that Sen. Clinton, a leading candidate on the Democrat side, says she wants to surrender in Iraq, she wants to wave the white flag. After all the sacrifice we've made in this surge, which everybody knows is succeeding, she wants to surrender and bring the troops home, and set a date for withdrawal ... If we do what she wants to do, al-Qaida will defeat us, and al-Qaida will tell the world that they've defeated the United States of America. I have never, never in American history heard of a leading candidate for president of the United States that wants to surrender to the enemy." </p><p>Is that a fair characterization of Clinton's remarks? Here's what Clinton <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/21/debate.transcript2/index.html">actually said</a> at Monday night's debate: </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/mccain_30/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/24/mccain_30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

