(Matt York/AP)

Richard Sherman can miss his kid's birth for the Super Bowl and still be a really good dad

The once in a lifetime conflict that maybe shouldn't be, as Sherman said, a topic of "national debate"


Katie McDonough
January 30, 2015 10:06PM (UTC)

As far as reasons to miss the birth of your kid go, playing in the Super Bowl seems like a pretty good one. It’s not like it’s a conference in Lake Placid or the return of “How to Get Away With Murder” or any of the sad reasons that George Bluth Sr. bailed on plans to bring Michael to that cabin. It’s a once in a lifetime conflict, and it’s a choice that Seattle Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman may have to make this Sunday, Super Bowl XLIX and possibly-maybe-but-not-definitely his future son's birthday.

"He's not supposed to come Sunday," Sherman told reporters this week when asked about the baby boy he’s expecting with his girlfriend. "Obviously that'd change some things, but I think he's going to be a disciplined young man and stay in there until after the game." (Related: Richard Sherman is seriously the best.)

Advertisement:

"He's gonna do his father his first favor and stay in there for another week or two, but I've thought about the possibility of him coming during the game and coming before the game and we have things in place in case that happens,” he continued. “And, you know, we'll cross that bridge when we get there, but, you know, I obviously did not know it was a topic of national debate, honestly. You know, I'd not like to miss the birth of my first son, my first kid, but, you know, thankfully and hopefully and God willing we won't have to cross that bridge."

I think it’s fair to ask questions about gender and parenting that Sherman's predicament might raise, since it’s fair to ask these questions of everything. But I'm with him in thinking that this is a strange topic for national debate. It seems like such a specific conflict that it's hard to argue that it means something about parenting roles more broadly. (And maybe more than gender, it perhaps raises questions about the larger than life status we give professional sports in our culture.)

But here are some reasons you might want to miss the Super Bowl so you can be there when your kid is born:

  • He’s your kid and he’ll only be born once (Unless!)
  • Your partner said she wants you there and that it’s a non-negotiable thing for her
  • You told your partner that you want to be there and it’s a non-negotiable thing for you
  • The pregnancy has been complicated and you and your partner are concerned about the birth
  • Symbolic and actual prioritizing of family over job
  • Being a parent has been a lifelong dream and life is weird and unpredictable and who knows if you’ll ever get a chance to experience the birth of a child again
  • The NFL is a sociopathic corporation and you want to break free/destroy the toxic game-above-all culture

And now some reasons to miss the birth of your child to play in the Super Bowl:

  • Playing in the Super Bowl is arguably the most important day of your job as a football player, possibly your career
  • Playing in the Super Bowl is a lifelong dream and life is weird and unpredictable and who knows if you’ll ever get a chance to play in the Super Bowl again
  • Bonus money that will pay for your kid’s braces/college education/clean water and oxygen in our dystopian future apocalypse world
  • You feel a sense of responsibility to your teammates and coaches
  • You've discussed it at length with your partner, and you DGAF and she DGAF, either
  • Why let a bizarre coincidence become a larger than life question about whether or not you are a good parent?
  • Being a good parent requires more than just being there on the day your kid is born

And I think it’s the last point -- that good parenting isn’t just being around to take pictures at the hospital -- that probably matters most here. This is where Mike Francesa really stepped in it last year when he criticized Mets second baseman Daniel Murphy for missing two games to spend time with his new baby and wife. “One day [of paternity leave] I understand. And in the old days they didn’t do that. But one day, go see the baby be born and come back,” Francesa said. “You’re a Major League Baseball player. You can hire a nurse to take care of the baby if your wife needs help.”

“What are you going to do? I mean you are going to sit there and look at your wife in a hospital bed for two days?” he continued. “Your wife doesn’t need your help the first couple of days; you know that you’re not doing much the first couple days with the baby that was just born.” Francesa knows what he’s talking about, too. He went on to explain how he did absolute dip to care for his son after he war born. “[My son] Harrison was born at nine in the morning. I worked that day. What was I gonna do, sit with my wife in the hospital?”

Advertisement:

Francesa is pure caveman here. Sherman is a guy in a tough spot who, if it comes to it, is going to have to make a tough choice. But it’s one that I’m sure he and his girlfriend have discussed, at length, in their relationship, about the choices they will make as a family on Sunday and going forward. And if they’re good with it, why shouldn’t we be?


Katie McDonough

Katie McDonough is Salon's politics writer, focusing on gender, sexuality and reproductive justice. Follow her on Twitter @kmcdonovgh or email her at kmcdonough@salon.com.

MORE FROM Katie McDonoughFOLLOW kmcdonovgh

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Dads Father Football Gender Men Moms Mother Parenting Richard Sherman Sports Super Bowl Xlix Women




Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •