Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

8 best cupcake recipes for an extra-special, extra-fun dessert

Cupcakes are a constant for me, not a baking trend. As someone who bakes a lot, I never tire of making them. They’re easy to make, and I always get excited about eating them. They are also a lot of fun to dress up, get creative with, and make extra special. I find that I’m not alone in my love for cupcakes, too — I have elicited my fair share of gasps and smiles walking into a room carrying a colorful box of cupcakes. (Seriously, move over bouquet of flowers — give me a box o’ cupcakes.) And if cupcakes are meant to be baked, gifted, and/or eaten by the dozen, I’m coming in hot with a bunch of recipes to keep you in tiny cakes for all occasions. My newest episode of Bake it Up a Notch dives deep into all things cupcakes — from super simple to over-the-top, I’ve got your cupcake to-bake list covered.

1. Basic Vanilla and Chocolate Cupcakes

These are my go-to cupcakes: an easy base recipe that can be made in vanilla or chocolate. These rise a “just-right” amount, to get a beautiful little cakey dome with a super moist crumb that’s a perfect match for any frosting or other finishes you can dream up! Be sure to check out this article I wrote back in 2015 about cupcakes, too — it has lots of ideas and techniques for making your best, plus creative ideas for making them look super beautiful, too. What’s that? Super in-depth coverage on cupcakes from me over five years ago on this same site? Just a perfect example of the cupcake constant.

2. Rainbow Cupcakes

Rainbow cupcakes are an easy alteration to my classic vanilla cupcake recipe that is so much fun to make. After mixing the batter, divide it into six small bowls, and use food coloring to dye each one a different color: red, orange, yellow, green, blue, purple! Scoop the colorful batters into the prepared cupcake pan one at a time, dividing each color evenly between the cavities as you scoop. As the cupcakes bake, they will set in a gorgeous multi-colored effect. I like pairing these cupcakes with a white frosting, like buttercream or meringue, plus plenty of rainbow sprinkles. Aside from rainbow, you can also do this with any batter colors you like! Try swirling the batter gently with a toothpick or skewer to create a marbled look post-bake.

3. Cookies and Cream Cupcakes

These are a sweet twist on a vanilla cupcake, featuring a whole sandwich cookie in the base of each cupcake, plus plenty of cookie crumbs folded throughout the batter. Using marshmallow fluff in the frosting mimics the kind of creaminess of the classic cookie’s filling — I like to finish them off with a miniature sandwich cookie, too (or more cookie crumbs). Have another favorite cookie? This would work with chocolate chip cookies, too — or even your favorite Girl Scout cookie.

4. Banana Cupcakes with Caramel Filling and Frosting

This is an easy-to-make cupcake (think: banana bread-easy) that’s leveled up with a truly killer flavor pairing: caramel. The center is filled after baking with dulce de leche, and it’s topped with a super yummy (and super simple!) caramel frosting. These cupcakes are dense, super moist, and rich — they might even be my favorite on this list, both to bake and to eat!

5. Strawberry-Rhubarb Meringue Cupcakes

You know I’ve got to throw a little pie-inspired cupcake in the mix! This lovely pound cake-style batter bakes up dense — a perfect pairing for light and fluffy meringue (toasting is optional but strongly encouraged by this number-one kitchen torch fan). After baking, it’s easy to remove a portion of the center of the cake and fill it with a homemade strawberry rhubarb jam. No rhubarb? No problem — make the jam filling with just strawberries! Or use this a jumping-off point to bake up your own fruity, jammy, or pie-inspired cupcake combo!

6. White Cake Cupcakes with Mascarpone Whipped Cream and Berries

This cupcake was inspired by my mom’s favorite kind of cake, which she calls “wedding cake.” It’s a classic white cake with a hint of almond extract, which makes it extra luscious. I like to keep it simple by finishing these cakes with a dollop of my mascarpone whipped cream. It’s simultaneously super creamy and beautifully light. Finish it with the fresh fruit of your choice: berries, sliced peaches and plums, or chopped mango are a few of my favorites.

7. Peppermint Hi-Hat Cupcakes

This is a cupcake that’s dressed to impress. I first heard of the dreamy hi-hat cupcakes via Martha Stewart and — swoon — immediately fell in love with the combination of moist cupcake and fluffy seven-minute frosting. As if that weren’t enough, what really sets these cupcakes apart is that they are dunked in chocolate cold-snap topping. The cupcakes then are chilled after frosting, which allows the topping to set firm and thin-crisp on the outside.

This cold and creamy situation is perfect with one of my favorite flavor combos of all time: peppermint and chocolate. The devil’s food cake is moist and delicious with any kind of cocoa — but is especially decadent with black cocoa powder, which gives the cake a rich chocolate taste and a gorgeous, intense color contrast with the light, fluffy frosting. That frosting is flavored with peppermint extract (plus a little pink food coloring, if you like) before the dip into milk chocolate cold snap. But these stunning cupcakes can be flavored a lot of different ways: You could swap the actual cake for one of the other batters on this list, then pair it with a frosting and topping to match. The dark chocolate, strawberry, and matcha cold snap toppings already here on Food52 are great inspo for flavor ideas!

8. Strawberry Lemonade Cupcakes

This is the perfect summer cupcake! It starts with a base inspired by pink strawberry cake mix — but my version spikes it with lemon and uses fresh strawberries that are cooked down to a thick puree. The sweet cake is naturally pink and boasts a lovely strawberry flavor. It’s finished with my lemon curd buttercream, which is made extra special by swirling it with the remaining strawberry puree. Be sure to check out the cupcake episode of “Bake it Up a Notch” linked above that shows a super-cool pro tip for swirling frostings, which is also a great technique for swirling different coloring of frosting together for cupcakes in general!

Scientists say spider silk could teach us how to replace plastic

For all our scientific and technological might, humans struggle to manufacture materials as tensile as a spider’s silk. Five times as strong as steel, spiderwebs are a testament to the ingenuity of nature — and particularly to the millions of years of evolution that endowed arachnids with the power to make such miraculous strands of silk. Chemists and engineers have studied spider silk for years to figure out if it could be adapted in developing novel materials. Now, an intriguing new paper has a remarkable proposal: use a biodegradable spider silk-inspired material to replace plastic. Such a concept would have incredible utility in reducing plastic pollution on Earth, which causes myriad health, environmental and ecological problems.

The new article in question, published in the scientific journal Nature Communications, reveals that Cambridge researchers have managed to create a sustainable material that could theoretically replace plastics but is made from plants and sustainable.

As Professor Tuomas Knowles, a chemistry and biophysics professor at the University of Cambridge, wrote to Salon, spider silk is extremely strong even though its molecules are connected together by comparatively weak bonds. The looseness of the molecules makes the molecules more dynamic, and they can be packed together in dense quantities.

From a material standpoint, Knowles says spider silk is unique in that spiders create it with protein that can “naturally untangle and restructure” itself, a process known as “protein self-assembly.” Knowles and his team followed the same principle.

“These interactions are formed in large part through contacts involving the backbone of the molecules; this is the part that all protein molecules have in common,” Knowles explained. “As such, we found that it is possible to take molecules which are unrelated to silk, but find conditions where they too can assemble into dense arrays which are held together by backbone interactions.”

Knowles hopes this knowledge could, quite literally, save the world.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


“This technology has significant potential to replace plastics in a wide range of applications,” Knowles explained to Salon. “Plant-protein materials are high performance, and have a perfect end-of-life.  Unlike fossil fuel based materials, no chemicals can be released when the materials degrade. And unlike most other potential replacements for plastic, our materials are 100% natural, with no chemical modification or cross linking.”

Knowles believes in the new material so much that he and his team have founded a company called Xampla, which plans on launching products based on it in the real world, including a micro plastic application (fabric softeners’ fragrance capsules) and a plastic film application (wrappers for dishwasher detergents).

“By 2025, we envisage that these materials will be found widely in homes, in personal care, homecare and food packaging applications,” Knowles wrote to Salon.

If Knowles is correct, the invention will come not a moment too soon. There is a growing body of evidence linking chemicals known as “endocrine disruptors,” which are found in many widely-used plastics, to dropping sperm counts among men. Plastic pollution has also seeped into our food and could be causing widespread illnesses like cancers. Large quantities of disposable plastic have found their way into the ocean, bringing considerable suffering to aquatic life and hurting the livelihoods of many low-income individuals. The pandemic has only exacerbated these trends by increasing demand for single-use plastic products and making it cheaper to create new plastic.

These are serious problems — but, as Knowles tells Salon, not ones that he had initially set out to solve when he began studying the webs woven by our eight-legged friends.

“When we started this research, our goal was to understand the fundamental nature of protein self-assembly,” Knowles explained. “We asked the question, ‘How does for example a spider make silk so strong?’ And as we developed, we realized that that fundamental understanding could be applied to many other proteins as well and thus address one of the principal environmental challenges of our day.”

Tucker Carlson suggests that FBI operatives organized the Jan. 6 insurrection on the US Capitol

On Fox News Tuesday, a Tucker Carlson segment went off the rails when he suggested that the Jan. 6 Capitol riot could have been, at least in part, orchestrated by planted FBI agents.

“Strangely, some of the key people who participated on the riot on Jan. 6 have not been charged,” said Carlson. “Look at the documents. The government calls them unindicted co-conspirators. What does it mean? Well, it means that potentially in every single case, they were FBI operatives.”

“For example, one of those unindicted co-conspirators is someone government documents only identify as Person 2,” said Carlson. “According to those documents, Person 2 stayed in the same hotel as a man named Thomas Caldwell, an insurrectionist, a man alleged to be a member of the group, the Oath Keepers. Person 2 also allegedly stormed the barriers at the Capitol, the same as Thomas Caldwell.” Carlson then suggested that Person 2 was an “organizer” of the riot, and the fact they weren’t charged as well indicates he was “working for the FBI” — offering no evidence whatsoever for his claim.

Similar “false flag” claims have been made by far-right InfoWars host Alex Jones. While Jones has been sued for lying about mass shootings being false flags, Fox News’ lawyers said in court that no reasonable viewer would believe the statements Carlson makes.

You can watch the video below via Twitter

Memo to “respectable” Republicans: Stop looking for GOP heroes to fight Trumpism from the inside

People who are afraid often engage in self-soothing behavior such as denial and wishful thinking. Unfortunately, reality is not so malleable as to be bent by such actions.

Barbara Comstock is a “respectable” and “traditional” Republican who served as a member of the House of Representatives from 2015 to 2019. In a recent column at The New York Times, she tries to grapple with the realities of Trumpism and American neofascism’s full control over today’s Republican Party. Her solution? To try to rally the “good” Republicans to resist Donald Trump’s influence and power by having a proper investigation into the events of Jan. 6.  

In “My Fellow Republicans, Stop Fearing This Dangerous and Diminished Man,” Comstock writes the following about Donald Trump:

Republicans, instead of opposing a commission to investigate the events of Jan. 6, need to be at the forefront of seeking answers on the insurrection and diminishing the power of QAnon and the other conspiracy theories that Mr. Trump has fueled. While he is still popular within the party, Mr. Trump is a diminished political figure: 66 percent of Americans now hope he won’t run again in 2024, including 30 percent of Republicans. He is not the future, and Republicans need to stop fearing him. He will continue to damage the party if we don’t face the Jan. 6 facts head-on. Nothing less than a full investigation is essential….

Many Republicans rationalize ignoring his rhetoric: His speech on Saturday wasn’t even aired live on Fox or CNN, and he may end up being indicted in New York and occupied with legal and financial problems. So, this thinking goes, what’s the harm in humoring the guy a little longer?

The harm is that the lies have metastasized and could threaten public safety again. The U.S. Capitol Police report that threats against members of Congress have increased 107 percent this year. Representative Adam Kinzinger, a Republican, has noted, “There’s no reason to believe that anybody organically is going to come to the truth.” Representative Liz Cheney, another Republican, said, “It’s an ongoing threat, so silence is not an option.”

Comstock continues that her fellow Republicans “would be better advised to fight like Senator Margaret Chase Smith. During the Joseph McCarthy era in 1950, she advised fellow Republicans that the Democrats had already provided Republicans with sufficient campaign issues, and they need not resort to McCarthy’s demagogy.” She concludes: 

The same is true today. Republicans need to have more faith in their policies and stop being afraid of a dangerous and diminished man who has divided the country and now divides our party. Reconsider the commission, let the investigation go ahead, and run and win in 2022 on the truth.

Her Republican Party (or at least the one she imagined) no longer exists. Today’s Republican Party is an anti-democracy, theocratic, neofascist, white supremacist, anti-reasonterrorist organization. Comstock’s pleas for sanity are the equivalent of putting a rescue note inside of a bottle and then throwing it into the ocean over the Mariana Trench. No help will be arriving.

Donald Trump is now the Republican Party. Republican elected officials overwhelmingly support Trump’s policy proposals and other initiatives and dutifully enacted them. Republican voters are deeply loyal to Donald Trump and the civic evil he represents. The Republican Party’s platform in 2016 and 2020 was basically “do whatever Trump wants.” In all, today’s Republican Party is now a Trump-controlled personality cult: Its leaders and elected officials will continue to do his bidding for the foreseeable future.

Comstock knows that Trump is dangerous but fails to reconcile it with the behavior of her fellow Republicans.

Contrary to Comstock’s encouragement and good intentions, Republican elected officials and leaders should in fact be very afraid of Donald Trump and his followers.

Most notably, during Donald Trump’s coup attempt and attack on the Capitol, his followers sought out the vice president — chanting “Hang Mike Pence” — along with other “disloyal” Republicans and prominent Democrats. Investigations by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies have determined that this was not some type of “political theater” by Trump’s attack force but instead a serious conspiracy. If not for the quick thinking of Capitol Hill Police officers on that horrible day (most notably Eugene Goodman), Mitt Romney, Mike Pence, and other members of Congress could have been murdered by the mob.

Last week, the FBI issued a report to Congress warning that members of the antisemitic QAnon cult have been radicalized into right-wing terrorism and represent an imminent threat to public safety. This is part of a much larger pattern: Law enforcement and other experts have been warning that the events of Jan. 6 and other Trump-inspired political violence are a preview of what will likely be several years of a white supremacist and much broader right-wing violent insurgency against the Biden administration and the Democratic Party.

During a speech on Tuesday, Attorney General Merrick Garland reiterated these concerns, warning that, “In the FBI’s view, the top domestic violent extremist threat comes from ‘racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists, specifically those who advocated for the superiority of the White race.'”

As shown by Media Matters, the SPLC, and other watchdog organizations, the right-wing disinformation-propaganda machine media echo chamber has been escalating their use of stochastic terrorism to incite their public — and Trump’s followers and other members of the White Right more generally— into committing acts of violence against Democrats, liberals, progressives, “Antifa,” “Black Lives Matter,” “critical race theory,” “cancel culture,” “illegal immigrants,” Muslims, and other groups deemed to be the “enemy.”

These “enemies” also include “disloyal” Republicans who dare to speak out against Donald Trump and his movement.

The Big Lie that Donald Trump actually “won” the 2020 presidential election and will somehow be made president again in August is increasing the likelihood of political violence by Trumpists and other members of his political cult. Again, this violence will be directed not just at the Democrats but members of the Republican Party who are deemed to be “traitors” to “the cause.”

There is also a nationwide campaign of violent intimidation by Trump-Republicans and other members of his political cult against state election officials and workers. The goal is to force them to resign so that they can be replaced with Trump loyalists, who will then interfere in elections to help ensure that Republican candidates always win regardless of the actual vote total.

On this, Linda So writes at Reuters how:

Late on the night of April 24, the wife of Georgia’s top election official got a chilling text message: “You and your family will be killed very slowly.”

A week earlier, Tricia Raffensperger, wife of Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, had received another anonymous text: “We plan for the death of you and your family every day.”

That followed an April 5 text warning. A family member, the texter told her, was “going to have a very unfortunate incident.”

Those messages, which have not been previously reported, illustrate the continuing barrage of threats and intimidation against election officials and their families months after former U.S. President Donald Trump’s November election defeat. While reports of threats against Georgia officials emerged in the heated weeks after the voting, Reuters interviews with more than a dozen election workers and top officials – and a review of disturbing texts, voicemails and emails that they and their families received – reveal the previously hidden breadth and severity of the menacing tactics.

Trump’s relentless false claims that the vote was “rigged” against him sparked a campaign to terrorize election officials nationwide – from senior officials such as Raffensperger to the lowest-level local election workers. The intimidation has been particularly severe in Georgia, where Raffensperger and other Republican election officials refuted Trump’s stolen-election claims. The ongoing harassment could have far-reaching implications for future elections by making the already difficult task of recruiting staff and poll workers much harder, election officials say.

This is part of a larger purge by the Republican Party of those elected officials and other leaders who have spoken out against Trump’s coup and other attacks on democracy.

In a new essay at the Byline Times, Catherine Orr, an expert on disinformation and psychological warfare, details the vast network of right-wing funders, paramilitary groups and other extremists who are attempting to overthrow America’s multiracial democracy and replace it with a white supremacist neofascist plutocratic theocracy.

Orr’s new essay merits being quoted at length:

The Three Percenters and the American Phoenix Project are just one example of how conservative mega-donors hide behind shell companies and conduits to avoid accountability for using their riches to fund extremism, disinformation, and at times violence. Countless more examples exist, many of which were revealed on Jan. 6 and many more of which will be revealed in the months and years to come. 

After all, this is far from over. The same people and groups involved in the lockdown protests, Stop the Steal rallies, and the attack on the Capitol have not gone away, nor has Trump’s incendiary rhetoric. With Trump pledging to be reinstalled as President and Republicans continuing to peddle election-related disinformation, there’s an endless stream of outrage fodder to fuel future protest movements and, potentially, more attempts to overthrow the government. And there’s no shortage of money to fund it. 

Orr concludes with:

As the pandemic fades away and we start returning to life as we know it, we should prepare to face a new normal in which “politics as usual” is anything but. Donald Trump may be out of office, but the forces that put him there are going strong. The Republican Party, controlled by an increasingly extreme base and a newly empowered class of radical donors, is spiraling towards a violent, uncertain future, and dragging the rest of the country down with it.

The last time anything like this happened was during the rise of the Tea Party, which ultimately shaped the modern face of American extremism and paved the way for a Trump presidency. We’re on a similar path now, except the center has shifted further toward the extreme right and the extreme right has shifted further towards violence — and an entirely new class of donors has emerged to fund it. 

There is and will be no place for dissent by “principled,” “respectable” and “honorable” Republicans such as Comstock and others in such a one-party Republican-controlled pseudo-democracy.

In total, this pattern of right-wing political violence is a major indication that American democracy is succumbing to fascism.

What Barbara Comstock and other “traditional” and “respectable” Republicans are really demanding from their political brethren is courage, which is doing the morally correct and right thing even when one is scared and the consequences from such a choice may be dire.

Today’s Republican Party is incapable of such virtuous behavior.

If it were, Donald Trump would never have been president and his neofascist movement would not still be menacing the country.

Ultimately, Barbara Comstock and other like-minded Republicans are looking for courageous people in a den of cowards.

Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s popularity continues to slide — even among Republicans

The more people see of House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, the less they seem to like. Over the last six years, as the California Republican has gone from being largely unknown among U.S. voters to a national figure, his polling numbers have trended downward. According to Quinnipiac’s May 26 poll, McCarthy now has the lowest favorability rate of top congressional leaders at just 12% — an astounding three points lower than Sen. Mitch McConnell.

That includes groups conservative leaders need to appeal to: A Morning Consult/Politico May 21-24 poll found McCarthy with high unfavorability ratings among several groups critical to the GOP coalition. Christians had a 28% favorable and 41% unfavorable view of him, retirees had a 26% favorable and 49% unfavorable view of him, and families with a military member as head of household had a 29% favorable and 39% unfavorable view of him. 

He’s not endearing himself to Donald Trump fans, either. The same Morning Consult/Politico’s poll found that among 2020 Trump voters who had an opinion of McCarthy, 37% had an unfavorable view of him. Compare that to an October 2018 poll by The Economist/YouGov, which found among Trump 2016 voters who had an opinion of McCarthy, only 22% were unfavorable. 

McCarthy wasn’t always a household name. Back in 2015, when he ran unsuccessfully for House Speaker before dropping out of that contest, Public Policy Polling reported, “Kevin McCarthy has made a horrible first impression on the American public to the extent he has made an impression at all.” At that point, according to the poll, 50% of voters said they had no opinion about him. Since then, McCarthy’s name recognition has been on the rise, as documented by Morning Consult/Politico: In January 2019, only 41% of those polled said they had never heard of McCarthy, a number that dropped to 22% in January 2020 and fell yet again to 16% in January of 2021. In the May poll, the latest, the number who drew a blank on McCarthy was just 15%. 

According to right-leaning pollster Richard Baris of Big Data Poll, most individuals who know who McCarthy is now rate him as unfavorable. On Steve Bannon’s “WarRoom: Pandemic” podcast, Baris said late last week that McCarthy’s unfavorable ratings are coming from independents and Republicans, with four in ten Republicans now having a “very unfavorable” view of McCarthy.

There doesn’t seem to be one dominating reason why the House Minority Leader isn’t more widely embraced by his own party’s voters. But a closer look at recent events and numbers reveals some interesting possibilities.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson revealed on May 3 that McCarthy has been living with political consultant Frank Luntz, whom Carlson derides as “a smooth salesman” pushing political messaging onto Republican politicians that reflects values more liberal than conservative. By drawing attention to McCarthy’s close ties to Luntz, Carlson fans might have the impression that McCarthy isn’t to be trusted as a conservative champion either. 

And Carlson’s influence matters. In March, Luntz himself did some polling for a nonprofit client, the de Beaumont Foundation, which found that most Trump 2020 voters — 52% — were most aligned with Trump rather than the GOP. And Luntz also found that Republican voters who were most aligned with former President Donald Trump trusted Tucker Carlson the most out of a list of conservative media figures on information related to the evolving coronavirus pandemic — more even than his fellow Fox News primetime host, the Trump-friendly Sean Hannity. It’s a fair observation that Carlson’s perspective carries significant weight with the MAGA crowd, and Carlson exposing McCarthy as a close friend of Luntz’s likely didn’t do the representative any favors with them. 

Two ethics complaints have also been filed against McCarthy, following a month of Washington Post Fact Checker articles documenting his living arrangements with Luntz. Salon has also published multiple exclusive stories reporting on Luntz’s ethical lapses with media outlets VICE News/HBO and the LA Times. Salon went onto report that Luntz’s ex-employees have called his research a scam, that Luntz’s current employees were mostly Democrats, and covered other instances of Luntz appearing in the media without disclosing that he was working for a candidate or party. McCarthy’s relationship to Luntz ensured the Congressional leader would remain in the spotlight alongside the embattled consultant, which can’t have helped his favorability ratings. 

In the wake of the Luntz revelation, McCarthy appears to have flipped his position on key issues, perhaps in a bid to juice his appeal with fans of both Trump and Carlson. 

On May 4, the morning after Carlson’s exposé, McCarthy went on cable news to say he had lost confidence in Liz Cheney — one of the most prominent Republicans pushing back against the Big Lie — as GOP Conference Chair, after backing her on the same vote in February. And after tapping a trusted lieutenant, Rep. John Katko, to negotiate a bipartisan January 6 Commission, McCarthy came out against the bipartisan agreement, and even whipped the House GOP conference to vote against the commission on a May 19 vote. Embarrassingly for McCarthy, a total of 35 Republican House members defied him and voted for the commission. Carlson has scoffed at the need for a January 6 investigation, and is no fan of Cheney nor her response to the Capitol insurrection

McCarthy’s favorability freefall might also have cleared room for the maybe-idle speculation that Trump could run for a Florida congressional seat and potentially become Speaker of the House if the GOP regains its lower chamber majority in 2022. 

On Tuesday morning, McCarthy seemed more concerned with Joe Biden’s domestic politics than an impending MAGA explosion of the Republican Party. “Well I remember past presidents who believe politics end at the water’s edge, but apparently, President Biden doesn’t believe that,” McCarthy said. “He complained about Republicans but he complimented Putin. I think he kind of has this backwards.” 

McCarthy’s office didn’t return a Salon request for comment on this story. 

Ending Roe v. Wade is the goal of draconian new abortion laws — and we’re getting closer every day

She is sixteen years old and pregnant. Still in school and devoid of job skills, she would not qualify to adopt a child, yet she could be forced to carry the fetus to term.

She is a mother who wants another child, but in the third term of her pregnancy she learns her fetus has severe organ anomalies and will die soon after birth, but she is denied a late term abortion.

She is a victim of rape who suffers post-traumatic stress that renders her unable to work, but she will be forced to give birth.

She has been sexually abused by her uncle for years and is now pregnant by him, but she cannot have an abortion.

Each of these women represent many others. They are the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about as the United States moves ever closer to draconian restrictions on abortion, and ultimately the death of Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision in which the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution protects a woman’s liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction.  

Ever since the Supreme Court’s decision a growing number of states have worked hard to promulgate laws and regulations that limit whether and when a woman can obtain an abortion. Restrictions aimed at reducing abortions are designed to challenge to Roe v. Wade in the hope it will be reversed. They include such measures as mandating unnecessary physician and hospital requirements, setting gestational limits, preventing so-called “partial birth” (late term) abortion, promulgating funding restrictions, and insisting on state-mandated counseling, waiting periods, and parental involvement.

But never have we seen abortion restrictions like those that now exist in 45 states, making 2021 a “year that is well on its way to being defined as the worst one in abortion rights history,” as the Guttmacher Institute notes. 

Various state laws from Arizona to Arkansas are a “Handmaid’s Tale” nightmare, but none are as staggering as the laws in Texas. Beginning in January this year, patients are required to receive state-directed counseling including information designed to discourage abortion, coupled with mandated wait times. There are constraints on various insurance policies including those included in the Affordable Care Act. Parental consent is required, and patients must undergo an ultrasound at least 24 hours before obtaining an abortion while the provide shows and describes the fetal image to the patient.  

Further, in May, Texas governor Greg Abbott signed a fetal heartbeat abortion bill that bans abortion as early as six weeks, well before most women know they’re pregnant. That bill is scheduled to go into effect in September, although it and many other proposed laws are being challenged in the courts.

No wonder Texan Paxton Smith, graduating valedictorian of her high school class, found her graduation speech going viral.  With enormous courage, she ‘aborted’ her approved speech and spoke eloquently, noting at the start that the six-week “Heartbeat Act” had just been introduced.

“I cannot give up this platform to promote complacency and peace when there is a war on my body and on my rights. A war on the rights of your mothers, a war on the rights of your sisters, a war on the rights of your daughters. We cannot stay silent,” she told the crowd, noting that medical authorities have said the fetal heartbeat argument is misleading. 

Shortly after Smith gave her speech, a Spokane, Washington, newspaper revealed that several months earlier a woman who suffered a miscarriage in a Spokane hotel had been investigated by police who found it suspicious that she did not meet them at the hospital as they had instructed. A search warrant followed because the cops thought she might be guilty of criminal mistreatment of a child. Ultimately the investigation was closed.  But women are actually in jail here and in other countries, charged with feticide following a miscarriage.  

It doesn’t have to be this way. There are many models we can look to in which women’s right to exercise control over their bodies is not in the hands of the state. The Netherlands is one such country. Abortion is free on demand there and yet they have the lowest abortion rate in the world, while complications and deaths from abortion are rare. Contraception is widely available and free, and abortion is covered by the national health insurance plan. Sex education starts early, and Dutch teenagers have less frequent sex starting at an older age than American teens; their pregnancy rate is six times lower than ours.

Why, then, but for Paxton Smith, do we never hear media reports about the critical issue of abortion, which male powerbrokers embrace with the force of institutionalized misogyny? Why does the current administration remain silent on an issue of this import when three quarters of Americans want Roe v. Wade to remain in place, citing it as a key issue affecting who will get their vote? Why is the American public so ready to give up on a fundamental human right that can touch all of us?

Why, Ms. Smith might well ask, do we stay silent?

Allen Weisselberg could be charged for tax fraud — and take Trump down with him: former prosecutor

On CNN Tuesday, former federal prosecutor Elie Honig walked through the implications of the new report showing Manhattan prosecutors are close to finishing their investigation of Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg — and may be prepared to bring charges against him.

“We’re on the brink of two make-or-break decisions,” said Honig. “First, prosecutors will need to sit down, assess all their evidence and decide, do we have enough evidence to indict Allen Weisselberg? If so, then the big decision is, does he flip? Whether he flips will mean everything for this investigation. He’s the exact right person to target to try to flip. He’s in the inner circle, the only person not named Trump who is in the inner circle of the Trump Org. If they flip him, he can open up a universe of evidence.”

“What is this new reporting from The New York Times, what does it tell you about the types of charges Weisselberg could be facing, especially when you’re getting into this issue of prison time?” asked anchor Erin Burnett.

“Prosecutors seem to be looking to make tax charges against Allen Weisselberg,” said Honig. “The charge is that he was paid by the Trump Organization not with a paycheck, but in the Trump Organization paying for tuition, for cars, for apartments. That can be a lot of income. Normally that kind of income is taxable. If they were doing this to try to get around the taxes, to try to beat having to pay taxes, that could be a tax fraud charge.”

“A lot is going to depend on the amount here,” Honig added. “Tax fraud charges can be as minor as a misdemeanor under New York state law, meaning nobody is going to flip on a misdemeanor, you don’t go to jail. Or they could be up to seven years per year of tax fraud. He could be looking at very little time or very serious time. That’s going to be a huge factor when deciding whether to flip.”

You can watch the video below via YouTube

Marjorie Taylor Greene refuses to say whether or not she has been vaccinated against COVID-19

The Independent noted one particular revelation from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s, R-Ga., latest attack on Dr. Anthony Fauci — she refuses to admit whether or not she’s been vaccinated against COVID-19.

Greene has spent the better part of the past year spreading conspiracy theories. After emails were released showing Fauci didn’t have anything incriminating, she spread suspicion, deciding to call for his firing anyway. But in part of that effort, Greene was asked if she had gotten the vaccine to protect herself against the virus.

“I stand with the Americans that want their privacy, and HIPAA gives us rights to privacy,” she said.

“She is a perfectly healthy woman and doesn’t see a reason to do so,” said Greene’s spokesperson Nick Dyer to the Savannah Morning News in March.

But now it’s unclear if Greene secretly got the vaccine while telling others that they shouldn’t.

As the Independent reported, she falsely claimed HIPPA laws protect her from being asked that question. HIPPA laws are about patient medical records being protected and not being disclosed without their knowledge. Anyone can ask Greene any question about her health.

“‘Vax records, along with ALL medical records are private due to HIPPA rights,’ Ms. Greene tweeted, both misspelling and misunderstanding the law,'” the Independent reported.

Greene has ranted that all vaccines should stop. She told Steve Bannon last month, “We need to care about the real issues that matter. We need to stop the masks, stop the vaccines and stop COVID-19 from controlling our lives.”

Greene also apologized for her previous comments that getting the vaccine was like the Holocaust.

“We can look back at a time in history where people were told to wear a gold star, and . . . they were put in trains and taken to gas chambers in Nazi Germany,” she said. “This is exactly the type of abuse that Nancy Pelosi is talking about.”

Read the full report from the Independent.

Chrissy Teigen and the enduring, celebrity need to be relatable

Remember  when cookbook author and social media personality Chrissy Teigen was widely recognized as the “Queen of Twitter”? She was beloved by the liberal “resistance” for her scathing roasts of former President Trump — who once even referred to Teigen as John Legend’s “filthy-mouthed wife,” a label she unsurprisingly reclaimed. 

Alas, her reign ended with the Courtney Stodden cyberbullying scandal, and after an apology, Teigen bowed out of social media for a good month or so — only to return Monday with an even lengthier apology. Teigen’s Medium post notably came out the same day fashion designer and “Project Runway” star Michael Costello alleged Teigen had bullied him to the point that he considered suicide, and differs a bit from your run-of-the-mill celebrity Notes app apology.

References to therapy abound, as Teigen writes, “I grew up, got therapy, got married, had kids, got more therapy, experienced loss and pain, got more therapy and experienced more life. AND GOT MORE THERAPY.” And even more curiously, she seems to psychoanalyze herself, throughout: “I was insecure, immature and in a world where I thought I needed to impress strangers to be accepted.” She also wrote of her attacks, “My targets didn’t deserve them. No one does. Many of them needed empathy, kindness, understanding and support, not my meanness masquerading as a kind of casual, edgy humor.”

Teigen’s apologies have been criticized as a supposedly self-serving attempt at stopping brands and sponsorships from dropping her, which could be true. But it also seems possible her very public penance could serve another goal, which is a return to social media.

After all, we’ve seen her try to quit before, as recently as March, only to return in April and, not a month later, bow out in May after the Stodden scandal. Not being able to quit something that you know isn’t good for you, whether that’s social media apps that damage your self-esteem, or a toxic relationship, is a universal human struggle and, quite on-brand for Teigen, arguably the quintessential relatable struggle. In Teigen’s case, whether it’s social media she can’t quit, or the rush of living up to her “relatable, just-like-you” celebrity brand, she continues to come back. 

Her apparent need to be on social media to present a relatable, everyday, normal-person persona, is, ironically, pretty unrelatable to ordinary people. It’s hard to imagine having a net worth in the millions, and preferring to launch into Twitter feuds over vacationing on a boat in Turks and Caicos. Social media is primarily attractive to “normal” people because the options of what to do for fun are a lot more limited based on how much money you have. Others have raised similar questions about the behavior of “Harry Potter” author J.K. Rowling — if you were that rich, why would you be constantly doubling and tripling down on transphobic commentary on Twitter, when you could be out getting some sun, traveling, seeing the world? And then there’s that other Twitter devotee who used to lead our country.

Specific to Teigen, her journey of social media stardom is worth tracing back for a deeper understanding of her actions and the public’s relationship to her persona. But more importantly it may help shine light on why she continues to return, even when the toxicity of social media is what appears to have made her a self-admitted “troll” — the kind that would mock a 16-year-old victim of child sexual predation — in the first place.

2011: Teigen allegedly cyberbullies Stodden and Lindsay Lohan

In 2011, Courtney Stodden first rose to fame as the 16-year-old bride of “Green Mile” actor Doug Hutchison, and quickly became the subject of widespread bullying and cruel “jokes,” despite being the victim of grooming and predation. Old screenshots of deleted tweets reveal Teigen had been in on this bullying, too, in some tweets telling Stodden, “i hate you,” “go. to sleep. forever,” and, “My Friday fantasy: you. dirt nap. mmmmmm baby.”  

In a May interview with the Daily Beast, Stodden further alleges Teigen sent them direct messages, too. “[Chrissy] wouldn’t just publicly tweet about wanting me to take ‘a dirt nap’ but would privately DM me and tell me to kill myself,” they said. “Things like, ‘I can’t wait for you to die.'” 

Also in 2011, an old tweet of Teigen’s is resurfacing in which Teigen jokes about Lindsay Lohan’s known history of self-harm, writing: “Lindsay adds a few more slits to her wrists when she sees emma stone.”

2014: Teigen allegedly threatens designer Michael Costello, also leaves Twitter (for the first time) over gun control tweet

As of this week, Costello has alleged that he, too, is a victim of Teigen’s bullying. On Monday, he shared screenshots of a text exchange he had with Teigen at the time, after Teigen helped circulate fabricated screenshots of Costello appearing to say the N-word. Instagram later deleted the screenshots in question from 2014 for being doctored. In Costello’s texts with Teigen, she tells him he “deserve[s] to suffer and die,” and “you might as well be dead.”  In his statement, Costello writes that for years, being blacklisted from his industry made him suffer depression and suicidal ideation. 

Also in 2014, Teigen departed Twitter for the first time following a controversial yet unfortunately not untrue post on gun control, in which she wrote, “active shooting in Canada, or as we call it in america, wednesday. That’s not a joke. It is a fact. . . . I’ve lost faith in this world. Sorry if it comes off as being unemotional. There is just so much bad.” 

Of her departure at that time, Teigen wrote, “I can’t see anything through the sea of hate and anger that is now my Twitter. Seriously I can’t sift through it all,” Teigen said. “It’s gotten to the point people don’t even see (t)he simplicity of the original tweet and have just wanted to get shaking-mad over something.”

She would, of course, return.

2016-2020: Teigen vs. Trump

The Trump era saw the peak of Teigen’s online notoriety, and her brand of irreverent humor and punchy cyber takedowns thrived with no shortage of subject matter from the unhinged former president. 

But early on, in the fall of 2016 shortly before Trump won the election, Teigen briefly micro-quit Twitter, making her profile with 2.8 million followers “private,” shortly after being trolled for defending Kim Kardashian from mean jokes after Kardashian had been robbed and held at gunpoint in her Paris hotel room. “Celebs are supposed to love you guys while also knowing you’d make a meme of our dead bodies to get retweets,” she had tweeted at the time.

Later on, over the course of the Trump era, Teigen became something of a “resistance” hero. She was blocked by Trump in July 2017, shortly after responding to one of his tweets, “Lolllllll no one likes you.” In 2019, when Trump called Legend a “boring” singer, and Teigen, his “filthy-mouthed wife,” Teigen offered the perfect response, tweeting, “lol what a p*ssy ass b*tch. tagged everyone but me. an honor, mister president,” which was widely celebrated at the time, as a number of women and notable feminists joined her in reclaiming the “filthy-mouthed wife” label.

Summer 2020: Feud with Alison Roman

While promoting a collaboration with the brand Material, New York Times food writer Alison Roman referenced Teigen and Marie Kondo in her scathing criticism of celebrities and famous people leveraging popularity to start their own brands or lines of consumer goods, which Roman was notably doing, herself. Of Teigen in particular, she told the New Consumer, “What Chrissy Teigen has done is so crazy to me. She had a successful cookbook. And then it was like: Boom, line at Target. Boom, now she has an Instagram page that has over a million followers where it’s just, like, people running a content farm for her.” Roman added, “That horrifies me and it’s not something that I ever want to do.”

Teigen responded by calling the comments a “huge bummer” in a tweet, since Teigen said she’s been using Roman’s recipes for years, and even executive produced a television show Roman was on, which Roman had mentioned in the interview. The incident drew significant backlash for Roman, as many argued her interview was hypocritical, and also highlighted how she had singled out women of color, despite the abundance of white women — and for that matter, men in the field — examples she could have cited to make the same point. Despite Roman’s apology, as her interview and subsequent backlash circulated further and further, Roman eventually had to leave the Times.

Overall, the feud was significant because it was a remarkable and perhaps even unsettling display of Teigen’s influence and power on Twitter.

Fall 2020: Teigen and Legend experience devastating pregnancy loss

Last fall, Teigen and Legend lost their unborn son Jack 20 weeks into her pregnancy. On top of the tragic loss of the baby, Teigen was cruelly criticized and mocked by some social media users for taking professional photos while at the hospital, despite how it’s a common practice by many who experience pregnancy loss to collect photos, mementos or other ways to memorialize their loss. 

Reproductive health and justice advocates celebrated Teigen and Legend for their openness about losing their pregnancy, since miscarriage and pregnancy loss remain widely stigmatized and erased, but Teigen understandably took a break from social media for a few weeks.

March to April 2021: Teigen leaves — and returns — to Twitter

By early 2021, while Teigen remained widely beloved by liberal, blue-wave, “resistance” Twitter, many on the left had grown critical of her, as a wealthy celebrity seemingly trying to be relatable to middle or working-class people online. In particular, tweets by Teigen about her mother constantly losing Airpods, and in February this year, lamenting being duped into buying a $13,000 bottle of wine, sparked online reaction ranging from raised eyebrows to rigorous roasts and takedowns. 

In March, Teigen called it quits, formally leaving Twitter, but not before a lengthy thread in which she describes how hard she’s tried to entertain and bring joy to her fans, but found the negativity just wasn’t worth it. Which is all, frankly, fair. A month later, Teigen returned to Twitter, again making a fair point that “it feels terrible to silence yourself.” It does! But there’s a difference between silencing yourself and giving yourself space from platforms that have become harmful to you.

Present Day: Ongoing bullying scandals

Of course, Teigen’s return to Twitter in April was short-lived, following backlash from Stodden’s explosive Daily Beast interview. 

As old and deleted tweets of Teigen’s continue to be unearthed, and news continues to circulate about her leaving or being removed from projects, Teigen has been scarce online, lately, save for her Medium apology. And while in her post, she explains that she is in the process of privately and individually reaching out to those she’s hurt, she’s yet to publicly speak on Costello’s recent allegations, or on the resurfaced Linsay Lohan tweet.

Teigen has certainly been the target of mean-spirited attacks, herself — especially after her devastating pregnancy loss. These attacks have also at times been pretty unnecessary or excessive, considering it seems misguided to expect wealthy celebrities to not be out-of-touch. But Teigen’s pattern of taking these attacks from online randoms too hard has often raised a question of why, on top of having nearly everything anyone could ever dream of having, she still has needed so desperately to be liked. 

As a recent, aptly headlined Esquire article points out, Teigen could, after all, “Just Be Rich.” If her recent Medium post is a sign that she may be planning a gradual return to social media, perhaps, for her own sake if not for anyone else’s, she should reconsider.

Is Netflix’s “Bo Burnham: Inside” our lockdown “Lemonade”?

Beyoncé’s modern classic “Lemonade” hit its five-year anniversary in April, marked by an array thinkpieces celebrating its timeless emotional resonance. Back then nobody knew that the Netflix special “Bo Burnham: Inside” contained a reference to a slice of what that album wrought after it dropped in 2016 – specifically, a mainstream claiming of Beyoncé’s messages of empowerment primarily speaking to and for Black women.

In one of the special’s most cited music video segments, Burnham poses as an influencer, clutching a mug with “Beyoncé is My Spirit Animal” emblazoned across it in curly cursive. Rolling his eyes coquettishly at a cascade of autumn leaves cut out of paper, he playfully croons about, “some random lyric from ‘Lord of the Rings‘ inappropriately attributed to Martin Luther King/ Is this heaven? Or am I looking at a white woman’s Instagram?” 

This comes after Burnham introduces his approach to the special by admitting his sense of helplessness, his fear that comedy won’t help and that maybe giving away his money isn’t enough. Then, in a moment lit to convey divine insight slapping him in the face, he concludes, “The world needs direction, from a white guy like me who is healing the world with comedy!

“I’m a special kind of white guy! I’ve self-reflected, and I want to be an agent of change,” Burnham sings a few beats later, eventually adding. “Lord, help me channel Sandra Bullock in ‘The Blind Side’!”

So when I say that “Inside” might be “Lemonade” for pandemic-stricken introverts, understand that this idea has certainly occurred to others. My spouse, for one; he made this observation while we watched “Inside” together. The first half of it, anyway. That’s all we could take in one sitting.

And that response is enough reason to explore this notion while fully acknowledging that doing so may certainly be interpreted as sacrilege to Queen Bey’s followers.

But these two artistic projects are of a kind in terms of emotional impact. Directly after “Lemonade” dropped on HBO – almost entirely unannounced, lending to its mystery – a palpable wave of passion rolled across culture. Robin Thede, who was a correspondent on “The Nightly Show” at the time, joked that watching it made her mad at her man for no reason. She was on to something.

The album is highly personal, tapping into an underground ocean of buried anger and pain Black women have been swallowing for centuries. What came up had to go somewhere and, predictably, that frightened the hell out of the males of the species.

Once that subsided, people appreciated “Lemonade” as a visual and musical masterpiece, drawing influence from directors, poets, authors, musicians and artists of every stripe in its construction and execution. Beyoncé’s work inspired reading lists, listening journeys and quests to find out more about some of the previously unknown creatives who inspired each frame.  

“Inside” is directed, written and starring Burnham, who also made the acclaimed “Eighth Grade” and co-starred in the Oscar-nominated “Promising Young Woman.” Burnham conceptualized each segment and shot it all by himself in his L.A. apartment over the course of a year. A highly personal kind of existential irony resulted in its creation, as Burnham describes in the lyrics for “All Eyes on Me,” which could be the special’s unofficial theme.

He took five years off from live performance to get a handle on the severe panic attacks he used to have onstage. “And you know what? I did! I got better,” he says. “I got so much better, in fact, that in January of 2020 I thought, ‘You know what? I should start performing again. I’ve been hiding from the world, and I need to re-enter!’

“And then,” he adds, “the funniest thing happened.” Recorded audience laughter intersperses Burnham’s monologue set to a languid emo melody, an obviously faked and spliced-in response to punchlines that don’t exist. People who know his story know Burnham is talking about himself, to himself.

By that point in the special, a year has passed, and we’ve watched him come apart at the seams, like so many of us have. His hair is long and shaggy, his mustache curls over his mouth. The camera records him losing it, knocking over equipment, pausing and breaking out into sobs. It also locks on his face so we can absorb his pained grimace at watching footage of his younger self, the teenager who posted a smart silly song online a year after YouTube came into existence and became one of its earliest megastars.


“Bo Burnham: Inside” (Netflix)

“Inside” is not designed as a contiguous visual album with a few breakout singles, but a work designed to be shattered and scattered in easily consumable and sharable bites – “content,” in other words.

Burnham knows that term implies something ephemeral and disposable, but he embraces the pejorative nature of it all. “Daddy made you your favorite. Open wide!” he sings, beaming a headlamp’s light on to a disco ball and creating a tiny whirling cosmos in his living room. “Here comes the content! It’s a beautiful day to stay inside.” Later he croons about turning 30 in isolation while shining a light on himself and, at points, up his own backside. (To cover the glow, but still.)

Content is a distraction, which is the role Burnham initially proclaims he wants his special to fulfill. That was before it came out in 2021, on the cusp of a season the least of Tom Hanks’ progeny would like to brand as White Boy Summer but may actually be defined by our impatience, burnout and bone-softening sadness.

Credit its timing or credit the fondness earned by its creator’s return after a long absence from live performance. Either way, “Inside” landed after a brief announcement about its existence and is being hailed as a singular achievement in pandemic-era artistry.

The White Woman’s Instagram bit is a 10 out of 10 because it nails the frivolous glee of influencer culture. Another self-probing ditty, “Problematic,” evokes Madonna’s “Like a Prayer” by projecting a cross onto himself. Every frame’s satirical image is instantly recognizable, and that reference has meaning.

Watching it can be a crash course in production and a study in the ridiculousness of modern memes. For every polished, entertaining segment there’s a behind-the-scenes view of the bootstrapped effort and time every shot requires. Burnham integrates those into the finished product. Purposeful shots of equipment and cables littering Burnham’s apartment floor speak to the chaos lording over Burnham’s state of mind, especially in a moment where he places the camera with a bird’s eye view of himself laying on a pillow, a mic situated close to his mouth.

“Maybe the flattening of the entire subjective human experience into a lifeless exchange of value that benefits nobody except for, um, you know a handful of bug-eyed salamanders in Silicon Valley, maybe that as a, as a way of life forever? Maybe that’s not good,” he laments, eyes closed, going silent for a moment or two before finishing with, “I’m . . . horny.” 


​​​​​​​”Bo Burnham: Inside” (Netflix)

This brings us to the other central draw of “Inside,” and probably the burliest part of its appeal, which is Burnham’s pure embrace of solipsism and a despairing critique of the way online obsession feeds it.

Burnham ended a previous comedy special by advising everybody watching that “if you can live your life without an audience, you should do it.”  That was before proximity to other people was something we all took for granted and maybe resented more than we should.

Now that the Internet is a primary means by which people connect with the world on a daily basis doing, as he sings, “anything and everything and all of the time,” it’s a mixed bag. The last year taught us how comfortable, disappointing, and downright poisonous that can be.

As such, the personal intent of Burnham’s “Inside” has been co-opted to reflect some version of the universal. Maybe those shots of Burnham dancing around while singing about feeling like a big ol’ bag of s**t captures a real moment for him. It happens to speak to how a lot of us are feeling, though, or else that song wouldn’t be one of the most played singles on the “Inside” album release on Spotify.

Something similar happened with “Lemonade” despite the meticulous analysis of the visual album’s cultural specificity. Within a short period of time the wider public transformed the album from, as writer Priscilla Ward described on this site, “Beyoncé’s personal story as much as it is ours as African American women . . . [s]he did this one for us” to an album more nebulously described as having a “clear emphasis on self-determination and personal growth.”

Claiming “Inside” is free of such irritating whiffs of cultural appropriation (although obviously Beyoncé doesn’t mind; everyone’s paper stacks equally). This is a comedy special starring a white guy paid handsomely by Netflix to agonize over his position of privilege, genuinely and in scripted musical segments. This is Burnham’s observation, not mine.

But if “Inside” is indeed the “feeling-not-so-great-but-at-least-we-got-out-of-bed” hit of the summer, that also assumes everyone has been inside losing their minds, staring into the mind-expanding/mind-rotting void Burnham describes in “Welcome to the Internet.”  (“Come and take a seat! Would you like to see the news, or any famous women’s feet?”)

That hasn’t been the case since the beginning of our collective COVID-19 nightmare. Millions of folks haven’t had the time or wherewithal to slump through apathy or boredom. Burnham speaks to that too, although somewhat obliquely, through the nerve-frazzling churn of music numbers and spoofs of popular video styles.

Even as he says it though, it’s presented as that content he promises us, as if whatever earnest and real impulses are behind it are part of the show. That’s probably why those pieces of the special are simpler to pass over than its translation of burnout and so-called “surge capacity” depletion.

Many of us have visited our own versions of Burnham’s headspace at some point, including those of us who maybe don’t have the luxury of being stuck in a state of reduced contact with the outside world. Many of us, like him, have continued to churn and produce and busy ourselves despite wanting to collapse on the floor and ignore the detritus of living piling up around us. Somebody might develop a literary syllabus to accompany “Inside,” but the main written work it probably inspires is a techie’s shopping list containing must-have lighting devices, projectors, and cables.

Still, “Inside” (probably) isn’t going to lead to any invitations to perform at a future Super Bowl halftime show. No films at Coachella paying tribute to unsung pieces of our cultural fabric will be forthcoming (I don’t think?).

There’s the main difference between it and Beyoncé’s 2016 opus, which will speak to Black women for generations (and everyone else at least until her next hit comes out) because it has a charge to it, a mandate to keep it moving.

“Inside,” in contrast, speaks to a segment of the privileged about who we are now and have been for the past couple of years, whether as a whole or in pieces.  At its most honest it captures the listless spirit of this age. “Full agoraphobic, losing focus, cover blown,” Burnham sings, and whether he wants us to or not, we feel his meaning maybe a little too closely and painfully. Maybe that inspires us to pass a piece of his art along by way of a video clip or a recommendation to watch the full 87-minute experience. Maybe five years from now it, too, will be hailed as a classic.

Or, once the apathy subsides and we all transition out of the liminal space between lockdown and full reopening, maybe we’ll recall it, vaguely, as some decent content about and of its time.

“Bo Burnham: Inside” is currently streaming on Netflix.

Mike Pompeo’s new PAC shares something big in common with a war criminal pardoned by Trump

Former Trump administration Secretary of State and potential 2024 presidential hopeful Mike Pompeo launched a new political action committee Tuesday aimed at helping Republicans flip a total of five precious congressional seats and hold onto occupied seats to emerge victorious from the 2022 midterms. But on Twitter, instead of the PAC drawing praise or recognition, it garnered endless ridicule due to the group’s slogan calling on conservatives to become “pipehitters.”

The organization coined “Champion American Values PAC” (CAVPAC) will seek to help “protect American values and to help Republicans take back majorities in both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate as well as governorships and control of state legislatures all across America,” according to its founder. 

The former Trump official turned 2024 GOP presidential hopeful has launched the political action committee in light of a potential run for the White House – all while currently racing across the country speaking and courting voters in key election swing states, including Iowa.

“Today at home, our foundational ideas are under attack more than ever before, and I intend to stay in the fight,” Pompeo continued in his statement. “We named the organization CAVPAC as a nod to my time in the U.S. Army Cavalry – the CAV in the PAC.  My cavalry service taught me that America needs warriors who lead and are willing to ride first into the fight without fear. CAV also stands for Champion American Values – the values that we know have made our country exceptional.”

The former Trump official then took to Twitter to call on fellow “pipehitter[s]” to join him on his mission. Notably, Pompeo, in an attached tweet from his newly formed group, defined the term “pipehitter” as: “Someone who is unapologetically American, someone who fights for our future, someone who never gives an inch, someone who is dedicated to stand against the radical Left’s agenda.”

But that’s not the definition most Twitter users were thinking of….to wit: 

Yikes: 

Pipehitter is also the name of the foundation established by Eddie Gallagher, accused Afghanistan war criminal pardoned by Trump. 

On Tuesday afternoon, Pompeo told right-wing radio host Hugh Hewitt one of the key tenets of his new group’s mission will be to prevent transgender athletes from participating in competitive sports. “We’ve got to make sure that our young people who, our young women don’t have to compete against young men in sports,” he stated. “We can’t have our voices canceled.”

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott says he’ll use crowdfunding for his plan to build a border wall

When Gov. Greg Abbott announced last week that Texas would build its own border wall, one of the immediate questions was who would pay for it.

Abbott has not fully detailed the plan yet, but he said in a podcast interview released Tuesday that the state will be soliciting donations from across the country to help fund the wall.

“When I do make the announcement later on this week, I will also be providing a link that you can click on and go to for everybody in the United States — really everybody in the entire world — who wants to help Texas build the border wall, there will be a place on there where they can contribute,” Abbott said on the podcast, a show about Republican politics called “Ruthless.”

Abbott made national headlines with his announcement Thursday in Del Rio that Texas would build its own wall at the Mexico border, though he provided no further details and said he would lay out the plan this week.

In the meantime, Abbott has faced threats of legal action and a bevy of questions about where, when and how such a wall could be constructed.

Abbott said in the podcast interview that the donations to Texas’ border wall will go to a fund “overseen by the state of Texas in the governor’s office.” He promised “great transparency,” saying “everyone will know every penny in, every penny out, but the sole purpose for those funds will be going to build the border wall.”

Abbott’s plan would not be the first attempt to crowdfund a border wall. There was We Build The Wall, a private fundraising effort that raised more than $25 million after originally planning to construct 3 miles of fence posts in South Texas. Last year, four people involved in We Build The Wall — including Steve Bannon, the former adviser to President Donald Trump — were charged with allegedly defrauding donors to the effort. Trump pardoned Bannon before leaving office in January.

A closer parallel to Abbott’s plan may date to 2011, when the Arizona Legislature passed a law establishing a fund, complete with a fundraising website, to construct a fence along the state’s border with Mexico. The fund received almost $270,000 by 2014, and a state border security advisory committee decided to give most of the sum to a county sheriff in 2015. The sheriff instead invested the money in border security technology such as GPS systems and binoculars, according to the Arizona Republic.

Federal lawmakers have estimated that the border wall cost the Trump administration nearly $27 million per mile in some parts of Texas.

On Friday, one day after Abbott’s announcement, the White House renewed its call to end construction of the border wall, calling on Congress to cancel funds it previously appropriated to border barriers and redirect them toward other border management efforts. The White House also said the Trump administration paid up to $46 million per mile for some segments of newly built parts of the wall.

James Barragán contributed reporting.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

The pandemic-opioid vortex

Barbara Legere’s son was an opiate addict for more than a dozen years. Five months into the pandemic, he tragically took his own life. 

Legere thinks it wasn’t a coincidence. 

“I do believe that the pandemic played into his loneliness,” she told Salon by email. “His only interactions were with me and his drug dealers.”

Since then, Legere has written about her experiences and is penning a book about her son. Legere believes that the isolation of the pandemic made his addiction worse.

“He started using not only more often, but more heroin,” Legere said. “He spent most of his time in his room —  he lived with me because I don’t believe in tough love. When he did come out of his room to hang out with me or watch TV he would nod off sometimes for hours. It was like he couldn’t stand being conscious or showing up for life. He had few friends and now he wasn’t connecting with anyone except his drug dealer.”

The stress of the virus was an added strain on him. “He was also very paranoid about getting COVID,” Legere said. “He was exposed to it early in the pandemic and tested negative but worried constantly about it, even though he rarely left the house.”

According to the American Medical Association, drug overdose deaths skyrocketed during the pandemic. Total overdose deaths may have reached as high as 90,000 in 2020, setting a new record. Experts say that the destabilizing effect of the pandemic exacerbated America’s drug addiction problem, as sobriety generally requires a consistent social environment — something that the pandemic undid.

Interestingly, some of those in recovery say that the destabilizing effect of the pandemic was a trigger to get clean. Years before the pandemic, Chelsea Cressman had used heroin while pregnant — and she was determined not to do that again.

Cressman, who was molested as a child and felt socially isolated, had turned to drugs for consolation at a young age. By the time she was pregnant, the addiction seemed to control her, rendering it extremely difficult to make choices in her own best interest and those of her loved ones. She is not proud of using heroin while pregnant; as she explained, she had yet to learn to put sobriety first in her life. In prison, she says, she was repeatedly harassed and assaulted by other inmates and even guards, some of whom called her a “monster.” She felt awful about herself. Sometimes she wanted to die.

Then she was pregnant again — and this time, she vowed, it would be different. Despite briefly relapsing after the pregnancy, she would ultimately get back on the path to sobriety. She celebrates one year of staying clean next month. 

The onset of a global pandemic, though a surprise, wasn’t necessarily a negative factor.

“A lot of people were very sketchy about hanging out because you didn’t know who they came in contact with,” Chelsea told Salon, noting that she would often use drugs when socializing. “It was just easier for me to not really hit people up and be like, ‘Hey, we’re hanging out so I can get high.'”

The opioid addiction crisis is currently the main driver of drug overdose deaths in North America. Dr. S. Monty Ghosh, who studies addiction medicine among other things at the University of Alberta, said he has observed the opioid epidemic up close in Canada.

“We’ve seen a huge spike in western Canada, specifically with deaths, because of poisoning,” Ghosh explained. Ghosh says the Chinese government has tamped down on exporting fentanyl; that, along with new border and shipping regulations, means that drug dealers have turned to other substances besides fentanyl that are being used to dilute drugs.

“With the new benzodiazipines being mixed in with the fentanyl, we’re seeing it is a lot harder to reverse overdoses,” Ghosh told Salon. “So when we’re trying to reverse an overdose, it’s harder to do because they’re not responsive.”

Street drugs are partly to blame. Dr. Jaydeep Tripathy, a primary care physician at Doctor Spring, told Salon that he has noticed “an alarming surge” in opioid overdoses. “This can be traced to the fentanyl-laced street drugs, which are now more accessible,” he said. “Because of the pandemic, many people with drug abuse problems fail to get the medical attention they need,” he lamented. 

Cressman, then, is one of the lucky ones. As she navigates sobriety, Cressman says she is staying focused on being the best mother she can be, which means staying on top of her addiction. As she explained, she went to a program “where I could learn to be sober while being a parent.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


Biden announces expansion of legal migrant program following Kamala Harris’ trip to Central America

President Biden announced a significant expansion of an immigration program that allows migrant children to be legally admitted to the U.S. as part of the administration’s larger agenda to increase the number of “legal pathways” into America.

According to The Los Angeles Times, which spoke with various officials about the development, the program’s expansion could help reunite many Salvadoran, Guatemalan and Honduran children with their families.

During the Trump administration’s family separation policy, which was presented as a “zero tolerance” stance on illegal immigration, thousands of migrant children were taken away from their families and deported back to their countries of origin. In 2018, Trump formally shuttered the Central American Minors Program, an Obama-era rule that allowed legal immigrants residing in the U.S. to petition for their children to live with them. President Biden reinstated the Obama-era policy back in March, with pending cases now at 1,100. “We see this as righting a wrong,” a Biden official told the Times. The Central American Minors Program is specifically designed to handle cases involving child migrants from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. 

Tuesday’s announcement greatly increases the number of children eligible to receive entry into the U.S. by expanding the set of criteria for which petitioners can qualify. For example, parents and legal guardians whose residency status is up in the air (i.e. asylum-seekers or visa-applicants) can now apply to be reunited with their children. Migrant children can now also qualify for the U.S. Refugees Admissions Program, a program that provides refugees – not just from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras – with basic necessities for living and dependable employment to create a stable pathway for citizenship, according to an official that spoke with the Times. 

“We are firmly committed to welcoming people to the United States with humanity and respect, as well as providing a legal alternative to irregular migration,” the Biden administration said in a statement. 

“This is a necessary but insufficient step to advance equality that is currently being deprived of Central Americans both here and abroad,” said Pablo Alvarado, co-executive director of The National Day Laborer Organizing Network, on Tuesday. “We urge President Biden to do much more to ensure Central American migrants are treated with the respect we deserve.”

While the development is likely to be met with similar applause from immigration rights advocates, the Biden administration has nonetheless come under fire for maintaining several Trump-era immigration policies. For instance, Title 42, which allows border agents to unconditionally turn away migrants for public health reasons amid the pandemic, is still being enforced

Back in March, Biden personally tasked Vice President Kamala Harris to coordinate America’s immigration efforts at the southern border amid growing pressure to address a recent uptick in child migration. Harris made her first trip to Guatemala last week, where she urged the country’s residents to remain there, saying: “Do not come. The United States will continue to enforce our laws and secure our borders.”

Catwoman’s oral sex scene erasure is just one more way media denies women sexual pleasure

“What is or isn’t in Batman’s bedroom repertoire?” is a question that most of us did not foresee being answered this week. But 2021 continues to be just full of surprises.

Buried in an otherwise ordinary interview with Variety on subverting superhero tropes, Justin Halpern and Patrick Schumacher, co-creators of HBO Max’s adult animated series “Harley Quinn,” shared why a scene of Batman performing oral sex on Catwoman wound up being removed. Apparently, pleasing a woman is just not what heroes do, according to DC Entertainment, which ordered for the scene to be cut, and as nonsensical as this thinking seems to be, it certainly follows a long history of puritannical policing and erasure of female pleasure in movies and TV.

Halpern’s full quote to Variety on the scene in question reads:

“It’s incredibly gratifying and free to be using characters that are considered villains because you just have so much more leeway,” he said. “A perfect example of that is in this third season of ‘Harley’ [when] we had a moment where Batman was going down on Catwoman. And DC was like, ‘You can’t do that. You absolutely cannot do that.’ They’re like, ‘Heroes don’t do that.’ So, we said, ‘Are you saying heroes are just selfish lovers?’ They were like, ‘No, it’s that we sell consumer toys for heroes. It’s hard to sell a toy if Batman is also going down on someone.'”

While this revelation has caused any number of humorous reactions on social media and in the superhero sexual discourse, the underlying reason for erasing this scene is more upsetting. Somehow, that toy marketing argument just doesn’t wash. “Harley Quinn” is billed as a show for adults and even carries a TV-MA rating. Its adult content – rampant portrayals of murder, blood, other violence and racy humor – hasn’t been a deterrent for selling toys of so-called “heroes” so far.

DC can attempt to make any excuse it wants, in this case, pretty explicitly discouraging men from going down on a woman if they have any dream of being a superhero. But Halpern’s recollection of the exchange with DC reads pretty transparently as what it is, which is discomfort with female sexuality and pleasure, when it’s not catered to the male gaze, or in service of male pleasure. 

In fact, if a powerful, macho superhero is supposedly the pinnacle of masculinity to which men must aspire, the message here is pretty bleak — that pleasing a female partner is somehow less masculine, and masculinity is defined only by being pleased. With male superheroes being defined by their refusal to give women head, it’s no surprise supervillains are becoming more and more appealing.

The recurring theme of erasure of women’s sexual pleasure onscreen unfortunately mirrors everyday realities. Researchers from the Archives of Sexual Behavior found the group most likely to always experience orgasm during sex is heterosexual men, 95% of whom responded that they usually or always climax, compared with just 65% of heterosexual women, the lowest of all demographics the researchers studied. A 2017 study by Durex found 20% of women said they don’t orgasm compared with 2% of men. Nearly 75% of women said they can’t orgasm during sex itself, while, incidentally, 30% of men said the best way to help a woman orgasm is through penetrative sexual acts. 

If men with female sexual partners are getting their inspiration from TV and movies, DC — and Batman — certainly aren’t doing women any favors. 

“Harley Quinn” is a show that’s more comfortable with over-the-top violence and yet is uncomfortable with an oral sex scene featuring a man going down on a woman; this is frustratingly par for the course in Hollywood. There is, after all, a notable history of movies portraying women receiving oral sex being more likely to receive R-ratings than movies that portray the reverse of this, or other scenes of rampant violence, as if there’s something inherently more explicit, vulgar and taboo about seeing a woman given pleasure.

But there is some hope for the future of cinema — namely from an online forum created by two women that evaluates whether shows and movies, and even books and music, with sex scenes or sexual references, pass “the Clit Test,” created in 2020. To do so, these scenes must simply acknowledge the clitoris exists, be that through suggestions of oral sex or other clitoral stimulation, or perhaps a character expressing disappointment after a sexual encounter that only included penetrative sex. There have been a number of recent passes, according to the Clit Test’s website, including Adult Swim’s “Tuca & Bertie,” Apple TV+’s “Ted Lasso,” Netflix’s “Ginny and Georgia,” and, in terms of music, certainly Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion’s “WAP.”

As much of society has become increasingly sex positive in recent years, thanks entirely to bold women and queer people paving the way, slut-shaming has been forced to become a lot more subtle. DC’s overt hostility to portrayals of women receiving oral sex almost feels like a bitter reality check. For all the empowering anthems and odes to female sexuality of late, from 2019’s “Hustlers” to 2020’s “WAP,” there are still a lot of people and a greater culture that disdain women having and enjoying sex. 

As the old feminist adage goes, the personal is the political, and there’s almost nothing more personal than pleasure. The discouragement of women enjoying and having sex for fun rather than procreation or simply cishet male wish fulfillment is a part of why there’s constant controversy and bad policymaking around birth control and abortion. It’s why conservatives warn of the collapse of society seemingly every time Cardi B breathes. And it’s why DC deemed it “unheroic” for Batman to go down on Catwoman in “Harley Quinn.”

For liquor stores, sales surged during the pandemic. What will happen when drinkers go back to bars?

Sales surged for liquor stores in 2020 as many bars and restaurants closed or scaled back service and people kept drinking at home and elsewhere. Now, as states’ case rates drop and COVID-related restrictions ease, the boom could be coming to an end — but that doesn’t have to spell doom for these essential businesses. 

While owners aren’t exactly complaining about increased sales, they’re also glad things are starting to return, somewhat, to the way they were pre-COVID. Salon spoke with more than a dozen wine and liquor store owners and managers across the U.S., most of whom say sales already are starting to level off as drinkers venture back out to local watering holes. As they see it, that’s a good thing — a chance to breathe after a remarkably tumultuous year and focus on why they got into selling alcohol in the first place. In fact, some are not only relieved, but confident their new customers will stick around, and plan on integrating some of what they’ve learned while battling unprecedented hurdles.

Happy Cork— Brooklyn, New York 

New York City is known for its epic nightlife, but Sunshine Foss, owner of Happy Cork in Brooklyn, is confident the customers she’s cultivated over the last year will continue to shop at her store since it offers something they can’t find in bars and restaurants. Happy Cork — which opened in 2019 and spotlights Black- and women-owned wine and spirits brands — saw a boost in sales in 2020 as drinkers looked to support Black- and minority-owned businesses, Foss says. While she couldn’t specify precisely how much sales rose, it was significant. 

“We started off begging people to come in and now there are lines around the block,” she says. But, she adds, most local customers knew of Happy Cork’s focus from the get-go — well before the death of George Floyd sparked a global reckoning on racism and police violence against Black Americans and prompted many companies to release statements professing their commitment to greater diversity, inclusion, and equity in the workplace and beyond. 

“People wanted to buy Black, and we were at the forefront because we were already stating that this is who we are,” Foss says, adding that customers “can’t find such a large assortment” of Black- and women-owned wine and spirits brands under one roof elsewhere in the neighborhood.

Foss doesn’t anticipate sales will plummet as drinkers go back to bars because many learned from 2020 that they relish making drinks at home. She also attributes this to broader cultural changes driven by the shift to remote work, to which companies around the world had no choice but to adapt. 

“A lot of people want to stay home longer because they’ve kind of become accustomed to it, which has changed the way people are drinking and speaking to each other,” Foss says. “There’s way more communication now. The virtual world brought a lot of people closer.” 

Happy Cork also capitalized on the rise of celebrity-backed wine and spirits brands to attract new customers, holding virtual tastings with the likes of John Legend (Legend Vineyard Exclusive) and Mary J. Blige (Sun Goddess wines). “We call it ‘Cocktails & Convo‘ or ‘Wine & Convo,'” Foss explains. “We were able to bring in two varietals [from Legend’s LVE wines] that are not anywhere in the market, so that is exclusive to us. We do things that are super-unique to keep people interested, but also drinking better.”

From these kinds of events, Happy Cork’s customer base expanded during the pandemic, transforming the store into a destination for drinkers beyond the city’s five boroughs, “so we’re going to keep on doing what we’ve been doing in that virtual space,” Foss says. 

Still, she’s taking a cautious approach to welcoming customers back into the store and doesn’t plan to bring back in-person tastings immediately. Yet as people become more comfortable shopping in person, Foss anticipates a boost in in-store business. “We have an app as well as an online delivery service,” she says. “About a month ago you would see a lot of sales going through our website. Now people are coming from all over — driving from Long Island and Staten Island and New Jersey — venturing out and saying, ‘Hey, I’ve been following you guys.’ It’s also a beautiful space, so people come and take pictures.”

Astor Wines & Spirits — Manhattan, New York

Larger wine and spirits stores also saw gains in 2020. “We certainly saw a substantial hike in delivery business last year because of COVID [due to] pantry hoarding,” Rob Fisher, chief operating officer at Astor Wines & Spirits in Manhattan, tells Salon. “We had a big increase in new customers because they couldn’t go out and buy locally, so they would come and buy from us [online], and I think they’re going to stay because there’s been sort of a mind-shift around, ‘Hey, I really like this delivery thing.'” 

Grain alcohol, which Astor hardly sold prior to March 2020, “zoomed off the shelf” at the beginning of the pandemic as customers stocked up on the potent spirit to make hand sanitizer, Fisher says. Sales have since returned to “more normal levels.” On the wine side, “mid-price range items seemed to really take off,” Fisher notes, because “people were buying so much more and wanted to buy more bottles, so they didn’t go for extremely high-end products.” The store also sold more aperitifs than usual, possibly because people were drinking more cocktails and seeking out lower-proof spirits and liqueurs.

As drinkers return to bars, Fisher says that Astor is “sustaining, and we’ll keep doing what we’re doing.” He notes that people have become comfortable with delivery and that foot traffic is also starting to pick up, but “the piece that really needs to come back is office workers” who used to shop in the store after work. And while some people will prefer the camaraderie of their local pub to drinking at home, that’s nothing new. 

“We’ve always competed with bars,” but it’s more “symbiotic” than rivalrous, Fisher explains. “We feed on each other — people go into a bar, try a new product that they really like and say, ‘Hey, I’m going to [buy] a bottle of this.'”

Horseneck Wine & Spirits and Vanderbilt Ave Wine Merchants — Greenwich, Connecticut and Brooklyn, New York 

Horseneck Wine & Spirits in Greenwich, Connecticut also saw sales rise during the pandemic, owner Greg Rubin says. And while he expects a dip as customers start drinking and eating out again, he believes the return of catered events, tastings, dinners and other in-person gatherings will make up for it. 

Rubin also owns Vanderbilt Ave Wine Merchants in Brooklyn, where the pandemic forced his business to improve its ability to deliver to different parts of the city. “We overhauled our delivery process and offerings,” Rubin says, including adding the option to order by text and other upgrades as “necessity is the mother of invention.” Because of these changes, Rubin foresees “not reverting really at all” to the way he ran his business pre-pandemic. 

“Our delivery system is better than it was, our website is better than it was,” he adds. “We’re better off now than we were a year and a half ago in a lot of ways.”

In addition to early-pandemic stockpiling of “big brands people knew and trusted,” Rubin’s customers later expanded their palates through virtual tastings, “and we ended up introducing them to new products — nothing out of the ordinary, but maybe a new producer in a classic category.” He also noticed “a lot more gifting around the holidays, [as people] felt compelled to just send a hundred-dollar bottle of something.” 

Additionally, the pandemic helped Rubin bolster his staff by adding some “incredibly seasoned folks” from the hospitality industry—deeply knowledgeable wine and spirits pros who “normally would not have been available to a retailer” but were “starting to think about retail as a viable career path.”

Beyond these practical changes, however, the pandemic prompted Rubin and his staff to double down on “bringing a very high level of hospitality to the job,” he says. They had to navigate how to be hospitable while still adhering to safety protocols, and think about how to offer in-store tastings in a post-COVID world. Rubin says they may not have asked themselves those questions as critically as they did if it weren’t for the pandemic. 

“I think at the end of the day, people were craving human interaction, kindness, comfort and grace,” Rubin adds. “There were few people customers talked to for months outside of their own family, and they wanted to be with people who they could just have a genuine conversation with. In a way we’re kind of like bartenders, and we’re happy to be that place for folks.”

Norfolk Wine & Spirits — Norfolk, Massachusetts

Delivery and online sales also took off during the pandemic for Norfolk Wine & Spirits in Norfolk, Massachusetts, which posed a challenge for owner Bikram Singh because at one point he was the only delivery person. 

Early in lockdown, the store — like other specialty spirits shops — went from being a boutique for hard-to-find whiskies, tequilas and other spirits to selling major brands like Tito’s Handmade Vodka and Woodbridge Wines to drinkers seeking “comfort-zone bottles.” Like many owners who previously introduced customers to different products through in-store tastings, Singh switched to Zoom, which expanded his customer base and connected them with distillers and winemakers they otherwise might not have known. 

Singh also set up what he calls “virtual hybrid” tastings, which were limited-capacity in-person tastings at local restaurants led by bartenders and brand ambassadors, with the option of joining virtually while tasting from home. Meanwhile, Norfolk Wine & Spirits’ parking lot played host, on certain days, to food trucks hawking pizza and lobster, drawing hungry crowds and more people into the store.

“There was no respite” during the pandemic, Singh says. “It’s been an exhausting time and a constant learning experience, being a small store with limited resources.” 

He’s more relieved than concerned that online orders and deliveries have begun to subside, as it allows him to focus on what the business is known for — rare, coveted wines and spirits — but also catering to a new wave of cocktail enthusiasts fueled by more than a year of at-home drink-mixing. 

“There are only so many opportunities that we can pursue as a small business,” Singh says. “If we say we want to be a liquor delivery company, we just don’t know if we have the bandwidth. On the other hand, there’s a huge following for cocktails and mixology, and that is part of our core competency — education, quality, craft. That will continue to increase, even with people going out. There are a lot more customers who look at us now as someone who can guide them in this journey, and that’s something we want to continue to do.”

The Urban Grape — Boston, Massachusetts

The Urban Grape, co-founded in 2010 by husband-and-wife team TJ and Hadley Douglas in Boston’s South End, also metamorphosed during the pandemic. 

“We spent the past year and a half rethinking our business model and leaning into finding customers where they are,” Hadley, Urban Grape’s chief marketing officer, says. “We had to get to them — not only via delivery, but also change our marketing [and] website to make it easier for them to shop online and bring events into their homes. We got very comfortable figuring out how to always be bringing our services to our customers as opposed to waiting for our customers to walk through the door.” 

Part of that meant significantly expanding delivery service from a single driver and van to roughly 100 deliveries a day within a 60-mile reach, TJ, the company’s chief executive officer, wine buyer and head salesperson, says. 

“The pandemic has shown us and trained our customers to receive contactless delivery,” he adds. “So often in sales, it’s all about convenience.” 

Agility also was key in navigating the pandemic — and prepping for the aftermath. The Urban Grape pressed pause on in-store shopping in late March 2020 to protect staff and customers and finally reopened on April 14. “And man, I can’t tell you how happy people were to come in,” TJ recalls. 

“They shopped with us because we’d built a wine counter outside that kept people safe and they could order behind plexiglass, but we had our doors closed for 54 weeks and we’re up about 65% [in sales],” TJ says. “It makes you think, ‘Do we need to have a storefront?’ The answer is yes, but we did such great business using our 2,300 square feet in the middle of Boston as a warehouse for a year, and we just flipped it back over to a fine wine and spirits shop.”

Similar to Foss at Brooklyn’s Happy Cork, TJ and Hadley have, since before the pandemic, sought to champion Black-, women-, and LGBTQ-owned wine and spirits brands, both on their website and in their store. 

After the killing of George Floyd gave rise to global protests, the Douglases found themselves doing more than selling wine. “This time it was emotionally meeting customers where they were, but also offering education,” Hadley adds. “Taking the time to bring these producers onto Zoom calls, getting people into the wine game and also [explaining] why it was important to support BIPOC producers.” 

That initiative paid off. 

“A good portion of our new customers found out about us because they were searching, specifically, for a Black business or a Black brand or a female business to support,” TJ says. “It was a very intentional spend. Our demographic has been enhanced because we have many more Black and brown shoppers now. Typically, wine is not marketed to Black and brown people, but if someone can see themselves in a space, it’s going to feel more welcoming, and that’s what The Urban Grape has provided. They’re happy to have a place where they can not only support but feel supported.”

Schneiders of Capitol Hill — Washington, D.C. 

Schneider’s of Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., also saw a “big uptick in business,” particularly online, when the pandemic hit in March 2020, vice president and fourth-generation owner Elyse Genderson tells Salon. 

Finally, the store is welcoming people back inside, “with masks, for now,” Genderson adds, although free local delivery is still an option. 

During the pandemic, Genderson observed strong sales of bourbon and gin from local independent distilleries as more customers sought to resurrect classic cocktails at home; sales of reasonably-priced imported wines — Pinot Noir, Sancerre, Burgundy — rose too. 

And while 2020 pushed many businesses to the edge, Schneider’s also weathered a turbulent start to 2021. Streets were blocked off following the insurrection at the Capitol on Jan. 6, reducing foot traffic. 

“That was a real hit at the start of the year,” Genderson says. “But now we’re coming into summer, people are happy, vaccinated, ready to visit with friends, celebrate and drink good wine, so we see a bright future.”

Genderson isn’t really concerned about sales dropping as people return to the area’s venerated drinking dens. “It’s great that everything is opening up and our colleagues and friends in the restaurant industry are coming back to full capacity,” she says. “Nothing makes us happier. We’ve always coexisted.”

Juice at 1340 — Chicago, Illinois 

Chicago’s 1340 Beer Wine Spirits closed on Dec. 31, 2020, after more than five years in business, but reopened in early May under the name “Juice at 1340,” helmed by partners Danielle Lewis, Tim Williams and Derrick Westbrook. 

Williams tells Salon the group will focus on collaborating with other Black- and women-owned restaurants to expand the business’ presence beyond the four walls of its bricks-and-mortar location. 

“There’s a saying that if you want to go fast, go alone, but if you want to go far, go together, and I think we’ve taken that concept to heart in everything we do,” Westbrook adds. “We’re stronger by connecting with other small businesses. Ultimately, we’re all on the same team because once people feel comfortable shopping local, they will remain local, so it’s kind of our job to lift up other businesses, along with continuing to work on our own.” 

Since Juice at 1340 operates as both a specialty wine and spirits shop and tasting room, it allows customers to explore a variety of eclectic beer, wine and spirits while also stocking up on what they need for a sophisticated home bar. 

“We’re really fortunate to be able to do both,” Lewis says. “Importantly, in the last year, new habits were formed.” While drinkers will go back to bars, many have a better understanding of what can be done at home since they’ve been making their own cocktails for over a year. 

“Getting to come to a shop like this, talk about spirits, wine, beer and cocktails with us and then being able to take that home and do it themselves — I think those things will continue as much as they’ll go back out and visit their favorite bars,” she says. 

Locally made beer is a prime reason customers come to Juice. 

“We focus a lot on Chicago and Illinois breweries, and this store has always had its following for those small craft beer guys,” Lewis says. “Even in the last month, we’ve noticed how strong that still is — people still come in here every Wednesday and wait for a new release from Hop Butcher or Pipeworks or whatever the local breweries are doing, and people have missed that because we’re one of the few retailers that carry it.” 

Juice also offers an ample range of cocktail ingredients beyond base spirits like vodka, gin or whisky. 

“People are interested in craft cocktail mixers we make in the shop at a far higher rate than they are in the base spirits,” Williams notes. “My assumption is they have a stockpile of booze and need some help working through it. People are really getting down with the DIY of [home bartending], and anything that allows them to sink their teeth in and feel like it’s a customized experience — that’s reflective of a year of doing things on their own, and I don’t think people are necessarily willing to let that go just because bars and restaurants reopen.”

Independent Spirits Inc. — Chicago, Illinois

The start of the pandemic was jarring for Scott Crestodina, owner of Independent Spirits Inc., also in Chicago. 

“We’re pretty old-school retail — brick-and-mortar, fundamentally — and overnight we became, to a large extent, an online retailer,” Crestodina says. “Fortunately, we have a system where our entire inventory is online in real time. Having the website in place was crucial — it made all the difference.” 

Especially as certain wines and spirits suddenly flew off the shelves. At the beginning of lockdown, “the very first thing that happened was all the Sancerre was gone,” Crestodina recalls. As time went on, “we also sold a lot of cocktail tools and common cocktail ingredients. Vermouth became very popular. People couldn’t go to bars and had a lot of time on their hands.”

Another big challenge Crestodina didn’t anticipate was “two-thirds of the staff stopped showing up,” he says. “But we got through it.” He and the rest of his team survived by shortening hours to reduce interactions and limit contact, while accepting they would “just have to work harder,” Crestodina says. “It got busier overnight, so we filled every order we could, as fast as we could, and it lasted about a year.” 

Now, with restaurants reopening, business has returned to a “fairly normal level in the last few months, which is great.”

“A lot of our clientele, just based on the nature of our business, are restaurant staff, so it was really sad to see all those people lose their job,” he says. “Fortunately, that’s turning around now.”

Independent Spirits won’t be resuming public tastings, which had been a big part of their business, anytime soon. Moving forward, Crestodina says that it’s hard to say what’s going to change in his business and when. 

“I have no idea what comes next,” he adds. “There’s a new normal every few months, it seems. I don’t anticipate extending our hours back to normal until we’re not wearing masks again, which I’m guessing could be quite a while. That’s the nature of retail — just roll with whatever comes and hope it’s not too detrimental.”

Purple Corkscrew Wine Shop & Tasting Room — Avondale Estates, Georgia 

Like Juice at 1340, Purple Corkscrew Wine Shop & Tasting Room in Avondale Estates, Georgia offers wine lovers a bar and shopping experience under one roof. The business lost a hefty chunk of revenue from having to halt in-store tastings — which brought in around 60% of revenue before the pandemic — but retail sales rose by around 40%, proprietor Steffini Bethea says. 

And since customers could no longer taste wines in-store before buying a bottle, they had to take Bethea’s word on what’s good, which she says built trust. Now, even as drinkers go back to bars, Bethea is confident Purple Corkscrew’s customers, old and new, will stick around. “I’m very optimistic,” Bethea says, noting that in June Purple Corkscrew will celebrate nine years in business. 

“We’ve deepened the trust of customers we had before, gained the trust of new customers, and built this relationship that’s going to be difficult for people to veer from,” she says. “It’s almost like we’ve been together for a year and as long as we continue to maintain our quality of service, we’ll continue to grow. The future is bright.”

Cork’n Bottle — Crescent Springs, Kentucky

Meanwhile, sales picked up “anywhere from 15 to 20 percent” for different wines and spirits at Cork ‘n Bottle in Crescent Springs, Kentucky, general manager Eric Bollmann says. “Everything was a lot more localized, which helped fine-tune our customer base.” 

Specifically, the store offered single barrel bourbon releases, which “helped us focus on local customers that shop here more often rather than people that just go buy bottles and flip ’em for money,” Bollmann adds. As customers took advantage of curbside pickup, “mixers went out of stock,” as did “syrups, a lot of liqueurs and different odd things people were requesting because they were making their own cocktails.” 

Several major spirits brands ran out too, however. 

“Patrón was out of stock for three months,” Bollmann says. “Rémy Martin, Hennessy, D’Ussé — any cognac product is hard to come by.  Tequila’s hit or miss,” and ready-to-drink margaritas and other canned cocktails also became “a lot more popular.”

In addition to gaining local customers, Cork ‘n Bottle attracted drinkers from across state lines, including Ohio, in search of bottles they couldn’t find in their state-run liquor stores, according to Bollmann. “People see the benefit of coming to a store like ours where we can provide suggestions and let them know when a product is going to come in,” he says. 

Business has slowed somewhat as drinkers step gingerly into bars, but Bollmann isn’t concerned. 

“It’s a breath of fresh air,” he says. “It’s nice that things are getting back to normal, people can live their life and it’s their option to come to Cork ‘n Bottle.” Eased restrictions also means the return of in-store bourbon and wine tastings, which “can bring in some good dough because customers are coming in, trying some different bourbons and then they shop.”

The Austin Shaker — Austin, Texas 

For Kirstyn Litchfield, co-owner of The Austin Shaker in Texas and a former bartender of 20 years, increased retail sales as a result of bars being closed was no reason to celebrate. 

Not just because bartending is “close to my heart,” she says, but also because the store’s wholesale business to bars was gone. 

“When the pandemic hit, none of us really knew what was going on,” Litchfield says. “We just tried to roll with the punches, followed the guidelines, kept wearing masks and when the state of Texas declared us an essential business, we just kept doing what we were doing. Our sales went up, but … I would prefer bars to be open, always — especially in Texas, [where] half of our business is wholesale to bars.”

For staff and customers alike, the pandemic made clear “our whole lifestyle is always on the brink of something like this happening again,” Litchfield says. “We’re just more aware of making sure that we’re [diligent] as far as cleanliness and sanitizing.” 

Moving forward, Litchfield is set on “continuing to do what we do best — sell great spirits to the people.” 

As far as drinkers going out again, “I do not see it as competition,” Litchfield adds. Echoing Fisher of Astor Wines & Spirits, she views it as “a symbiotic relationship,” as she regularly suggests customers try something at a bar before committing to a bottle. Similarly, if they taste something they like at a bar, the bartender often points them to Litchfield’s store. “It’s cross-promotion,” Litchfield says. “A win-win.”

OST Liquor — Houston, Texas

When Chris Cooper opened OST Liquor in Houston, Texas in June 2020, he sought to fill what he saw as a void in the local liquor store landscape. Cooper saw some larger liquor stores as “really cookie-cutter, really price-driven” and wanted OST Liquor to focus on spirits and craft cocktail education, while also highlighting minority-owned spirits brands.

He also wanted to give customers a more personal experience than the “transactional, ‘give me your money and see you later'” one they might have in other stores where the bottles are locked in cages or behind bulletproof glass. OST Liquor also made drinkers’ lives easier with its mobile app and online delivery, “and we connected with other marketplaces like Drizly and Uber Eats to extend our reach,” Cooper adds. “None of the other places that we’re competing with in our area were doing that.”

Additionally, Cooper capitalized on take-home cocktail kits at a time when DIY cocktail making and to-go cocktails already were on the rise. He describes the “double-cup” cocktail kits sold at OST Liquor as “the retail side on how to serve drinks to-go—we took the idea of ‘value bags’ and transformed it into actual cocktails.” 

The kits are not only convenient, but also make it easier for customers to try new spirits before committing to a full bottle. “The smaller size really opens you up to trying something different,” Cooper says, adding that during the height of the pandemic OST Liquor was selling around 900 to a thousand cocktail kits a week, which has since leveled off to “about 650 to 700.”

Unlike liquor stores that were in business since before the pandemic, Cooper opened OST Liquor in the thick of it, so he has nothing to compare with the boom he experienced from the get-go. Granted, business was “slow” in January and February of 2021, but given OST Liquor’s strong start, Cooper is optimistic robust sales are “going to be the norm” moving forward. 

Like Litchfield, he’s counting on his store’s sales ramping up as bars’ business does. “Our business structure is set up to support all these different avenues within the industry,” he explains. “Around the same time things started opening back up, we started revving up our on-premise accounts, supporting those bars and restaurants.”

TopLine Wine & Spirits — Glendale, California 

In the beginning of the pandemic, customers of TopLine Wine & Spirits in Glendale, California were stockpiling liquor to “medicate” themselves, social media director and retail sales manager Cat Chin says. 

But over time, TopLine expanded its selection of amari, vermouth and other specialty spirits made by smaller distilleries in response to customers’ increased thirst for homemade cocktails. 

As drinkers go back to bars, Chin isn’t concerned about TopLine’s bottom line taking too great a hit. She believes customers will continue to shop there, not just for its eclectic selection of spirits and wines from lesser-known winemaking regions, but also friendly, laid-back staff. 

TopLine doesn’t offer online ordering or advertise but Chin says people learn about the shop from word-of-mouth—and from interviews with distillers, winemakers and brand ambassadors on TopLine’s social media accounts. “We’re just going to continue as we’ve been doing because it seems to work,” Chin says. “We try to find the best product we can for the best prices. That’s always been our main goal. The fact that we have really interesting wines — Lebanese wines, Israeli wines, Slovenian wines — we do try to select interesting products, and that helps our business.”

Flask & Field — Los Angeles, California 

One of the biggest challenges Miriam Yoo faced at the start of the pandemic was shuttering the inside of her downtown Los Angeles specialty wine and spirits shop, Flask & Field, and transforming it into an e-commerce operation. 

While liquor stores, in general, saw an uptick in sales during the pandemic, Yoo says significantly curtailing in-person shopping at Flask & Field “definitely affected our business negatively.” 

But if eliminating in-store tastings hurt profits, that was offset by increased revenue from gifting services and virtual tastings, Yoo adds. And she considers herself more fortunate than owners of other struggling small businesses. “We obviously were able to survive,” Yoo says. “It’s easier to get someone to buy a bottle of wine” than splurge on a pricey pair of shoes.

While Yoo noticed people buying different products at various stages of the pandemic — early on they sought comfort in red wine and later invested in sturdy bar tools for at-home happy hours — her customers return to the store for the same reason. “People will always be drinking wine and spirits, but they come to us for natural wine, something cool, small-batch,” she says. “Our customers pretty much have stayed steady in their buying patterns.”

Yoo says she spent no money on advertising during the pandemic and, like TopLine, relies on Instagram and word-of-mouth to draw new customers. 

The store gained plenty over the last year and a half, she adds, which she attributes to being “authentic” and direct about what she believes in, whether it has to do with wine, politics, or how she’s feeling. “The people who come to us have a genuine nerdy appreciation for wine, so they just like to be at a place where someone else is nerd-ing out over the things they like to nerd out about,” she explains. 

But Yoo also sees a greater purpose beyond the day-to-day grind of keeping Flask & Field in business. She says she embraces her ability as a woman of color and business owner to spearhead change in an industry that’s reckoning with a lack of diversity and sexual harassment problem

“There are not a lot of Asian women that front a wine shop or a liquor store,” Yoo says. “I think a lot of customers who are Asian or people of color really found us during the pandemic and were like, ‘Hey, I didn’t know you guys existed, and it’s cool what you’re doing.’ We didn’t shy away from talking about things during [the] Black Lives Matter [protests] and really using our business to not just be for-profit but really fuel some sort of social change. People resonate with a voice that sounds real.”

Yoo continues: “I think that we see retail in general as part of that unsustainable toxic capitalist system where employees aren’t cared for. All I can do as a business owner is change that within my own business [by] taking care of my employees. Yes, we’re a business, but we can also … change the world [by] creating a community where my associates are treated with dignity and respect. A small business can succeed and do things differently, instead of just being in survival mode.”

 

Marjorie Taylor Greene slams attorney general for “defining domestic terrorism as white supremacy”

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., on Tuesday lashed out at Attorney General Merrick Garland after he announced a plan to combat domestic terrorism.

Greene made the remarks while appearing on “Real America’s Voice” with host Steve Bannon.

“I’ve been watching his comments,” Greene said of Garland. “Here’s the real concern. What is domestic terrorism? Define this. You know, here we have Antifa/BLM that terrorized — terrorized! — American citizens for the year. I mean, imagine this summer of rage this past summer.”

“That is insurrection,” she continued. “They were attacking federal buildings, police officers. They’re trying to dismantle every bit of law enforcement in all of these cities and who are the victims? The American people. Is that not domestic terrorism?”

Greene added, “And yet, here [Garland] is on the screen, I’ve been watching his words, defining domestic terrorism as white supremacy, racism, people that went on Jan. 6.”

According to the Georgia lawmaker, the Constitution guarantees “the right to dismantle a government when it becomes tyrannical.”

“And so, let’s ask the real question,” she remarked. “What is domestic terrorism? Is it really what this Merrick Garland and the Democrats are telling us? It’s the people that went to Washington on Jan. 6 because they really wanted accountability from their government and they knew what we all know and what I cannot wait to see come out, that there was real election fraud and they believe that it’s stolen.”

“Here’s what the big lie is,” Greene said. “It’s this guy on the screen and the Democrats and those in charge saying that our patriots in the military, that our patriots in law enforcement and that our patriots of American citizens, calling them domestic terrorists when they refuse, they refuse to do anything about Antifa and BLM.”

Greene also blasted Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., and suggested that the Democrats “have to take her out.”

“These are the people that should be called domestic terrorists!” she exclaimed.

Bannon interrupted to clarify that Greene wants to “dismantle” the government through lawful means.

“We won on Nov. 3,” Bannon said, referring to the 2020 election. “We’re going to prove that in courts and we’re going to prove that in state legislatures.”

You can watch the video below via YouTube:

Why the panic over “critical race theory” is the perfect right-wing troll

The American right is currently in an utter panic over “critical race theory” being taught in public schools.

On Fox News, there’s been an explosion of hysterical coveragecomplete with contradictory segments where hosts claim they “don’t see people for skin color” before whining that “the United States of America elected an African-American as president of the United States” and “the biggest entertainers, the biggest sports stars are African-Americans.” Republicans who otherwise claim to be defenders of free speech are busy trying to pass laws canceling any kind of talk they deem “critical race theory,” which, in practice, amounts to bans on talking about historical facts. Across the nation, white parents are crowding school board meetings, melting down over this “critical race theory” thing they’ve heard so much about

Yet with so many white people across the country in a total freak out over “critical race theory,” it appears few, if any, of them could even explain what it actually is. That’s because, despite what Fox News is telling them, critical race theory — the actual academic framework that was developed in law schools to understand the historical reasons our legal system perpetuates racial inequalities — is not, in fact, being taught to 3rd graders or even 11th graders. Claims otherwise are a complete lie, ginned up by right-wing propagandists who are desperate to keep the GOP base whipped into a racist frenzy. 

But even though the whole panic is built on a foundation of sand, it would be unwise of liberals to shrug and dismiss this particular bit of agitprop. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


It is important to note that the fabricated fury over “critical race theory” is a cleverly constructed right-wing troll. Liberals who want to respond with a quick, easily digested rebuttal are instead boxed into a frustrating corner. Because pointing out that critical race theory is not being taught in public schools is a trap, as it could be construed to imply that there’s something wrong with critical race theory. And any straightforward defense of critical race theory implies that schoolchildren are somehow expected to understand graduate school-level academic theories. But in fact, the real issue at hand is that conservatives don’t want white kids to learn even the most basic truths about American history. 

To understand what’s really going on under all the scare-mongering, it’s important to know that when conservatives talk about “critical race theory,” they aren’t talking about the actual academic framework developed by law professors. Instead, as Sean Illing at Vox explains, “conservatives have appropriated critical race theory as a convenient catchall to describe basically any serious attempt to teach the history of race and racism.” 

Of course, telling people that you oppose teaching the truth about American history sounds bad. So instead, conservative pundits and Republican politicians use the term “critical race theory,” using the thin justification that the facts teachers are sharing have often been unearthed by people doing academic research within this framework. The word “theory,” in particular, has a long history of setting off poorly educated conservative voters who think it just means “not facts” and don’t know that, in academia, it is used to mean an analytical framework for developing factual information. Think of the hysterics around evolutionary theory, for instance, which many conservatives would dismiss as “just a theory,” not grasping that it was empirically sound. 

And that’s the crux of it: Schoolchildren aren’t really being taught critical race theory, but critical race theory — the actual framework, not the right-wing scare term — is a legitimate academic pursuit that has turned up important facts that white supremacists of yore have covered up. And it’s those factsthings like the practice of redlining, the truth about what the Confederacy stood for, what Martin Luther King Jr. really believed, and the history of lynching and events like the Tulsa race massacre — that conservatives want to silence. That is why, for instance, they are so afraid of schools teaching the 1619 Project by the New York Times. Not because, as they falsely claim, it’s inaccurate. No, the real objection underlying all the noise is that the 1619 Project is true. Conservatives want facts, the thing that all people claim they want children to learn, to be replaced with flat-out lies about American history. 

That’s why the feigned umbrage over “critical race theory” is such an effective troll. Responding requires nuance, an explanation of why it’s both false that critical race theory is being taught in schools, but also that the real-world practice of critical race theory is not bad or scary or “anti-white.” Unfortunately, our political discourse doesn’t have much room for nuance, much less lengthy explanations. And so it’s easy to get Republican voters, already wanting to believe that white people are under attack from “woke mobs,” to get all ginned up on conspiracy theories about “critical race theory,” and not look at what the real-world critical race theory actually is, much less the historical facts that Republican politicians want to cover up. While they scare white voters into a panic over their children learning too many details about Jim Crow, Republican legislators are busy passing up draconian restrictions on the right to vote reminiscent of that era of racial segregation

Indeed, the idea that “critical race theory” was just the kind of phrase that would easily scare conservatives can be traced back to the time that Andrew Breitbart was still alive. He and the other editors at Breitbart understood that “critical,” “race,” and “theory” are three words their readers don’t really understand well — but do fear — and smashed together, could be leveraged as a Voltron of racist paranoia. Salon reporter Alex Seitz-Wald found, in 2012, that a search for “critical race theory” on Breitbart “returns an astonishing 871 results, over 680 from the past month alone.” Rarely, if ever, was the term used accurately.

So what can liberals do to fight back against the spread of conspiracy theories about “critical race theory” that misrepresent both what critical race theory is and what is actually being taught in public schools?


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Well, despite just going down the rabbit hole of explaining the history and proper meaning of the phrase in this piece, I would generally caution against doing that. “Keep it simple, stupid,” is always key when rebutting or debating conservatives who are lying — or, at least, are regurgitating lies they picked up from Fox News. Instead, as with most trolls, it’s wiser to go meta. Instead of getting into the weeds about what is and isn’t “critical race theory,” point out that it’s being leveraged as a scare term to conceal what’s really going on, which is a war on the right of teachers to teach basic facts about American history. 

Luckily, that’s just what a group of educators did on Saturday, organizing a National Day of Action in which teachers across the nation spoke out against censorship and in favor of being able to teach historical facts. The protest was organized by the Zinn Education Project, but Becky Pringle, president of the National Education Association, also spoke out in favor of fact-based education. 

“No matter our color, background, or Zip code, we want our kids to have an education that imparts honesty about who we are, integrity in how we treat others, and courage to do what’s right,” she said in a statement, adding, “some lawmakers want to play politics with the truth.”

Moving away from the debate about what is or isn’t “critical race theory” and instead focusing on what lawmakers are actually trying to do — replace factual information with fake history — helps recenter the debate on what’s really going on. After all, the only reason Republicans and right-wing pundits lie about what is and isn’t in the public school curriculum is because they know they can’t win the debate by being honest. The truth terrifies them, which is why they go to such lengths to conceal it both in public debate and in our public schools. 

Picnic dinners are the one thing I’m keeping from last year

There’s a lot from the last year that I am ready to toss to the wayside: Zoom birthday parties? No thanks. Remote learning? Never again — please! My house slippers? I’m planning a bonfire. One of the few things I’m keeping? Picnic dinners. While I am delighted to be patronizing our favourite taco spot and dosa shop again, I’m definitely not giving up the casual outdoor meal tradition my family came to discover — and love.

Last spring, when the weather turned warm enough to eat outside (or to be honest, while it was still a tad too cool), my husband, my son, and I started packing up meals to eat outdoors. It was a way to escape the confines of our relatively small home and also a necessity on days when we’d planned a hike or beach trip and we couldn’t pop into a restaurant. Al fresco lunches had always been a part of our routine — and frankly, expected — but picnic dinners were new — and they were a revelation.

I quickly discovered that our picnic dinners had the power to change the tone of the whole week. In this time when weekdays bleed together, a meal taken outdoors, away from home, and at dusk, became a delightful demarcation between the work day and the family part of the day. And when we picnicked on a Sunday night, the meal seemed to stretch the weekend a little longer.

A picnic dinner is also a punctuation mark in the week or the month. The novelty of picnicking creates a memory. If I think back on last summer, those dinners stand out as some of the happiest memories in my mind (and in my son’s mind, too).

A picnic dinner is also a surefire way to put everyone in a good mood. Being outside seems to relax my family. Under an open sky it feels like the pace slows down. My son thinks the experience is a treat and I’m off the hook for preparing another proper meal, setting the table, and tidying up. As a bonus, I find I’m way less likely to crack open my laptop or pick up my phone for mindless scrolling if we’ve eaten outside.

Sometimes our dinner picnics took place at the park closest to our home, where we might run into a neighbor and sneak in an extra session on the playground. Other times, we piled into our car and headed further afield, seeking out a waterfront location. Those more far-flung spots were worth the hike, but a blanket spread out in the local park was enough to create the change-from-our-usual-routine magic.

On a practical note: Picnic dinners also turned out to be a great way to clean out the fridge. Sometimes our outdoor meals are containers of leftovers plus some cut-up fruits and veggies, nuts, and hard-boiled eggs. If I did make something special, it was always the kind of dish that tastes even better at room temperature, like beans, pasta, or grain salads. I pack it all up in a cooler bag and a big canvas tote and everyone can pick and choose what they want once we’re at our spot. When we get home, everything goes straight into the dishwasher, so clean-up is minimal. When we really weren’t in the mood to cook or clean, takeaway slices of pizza were our “picnic.”

If you want to try your own family dinner outdoors, know that the beauty of a picnic is in its casualness: My family’s picnics are not Instagrammable experiences. They’re thrown-together meals with mismatched food containers and an old blanket that I don’t mind spilling on. Of course, you can perfect your packable menu and invest in a cute basket, but for me, these are really more about getting outside and making a memory than any styling or anything we’re eating.

So as the world opens up this summer, don’t be surprised if you see my family eating our dinner in the park or the Open Streets instead of a restaurant. But this time, we’re likely to be sharing it with friends. Because while I am clinging to the slowed-down pace of stay-at-home life, I’m also gleeful to share it with all the friends we’ve missed so much.

This post contains products independently chosen (and loved) by Food52 editors and writers. As an Amazon Associate and Skimlinks affiliate, Food52 earns a commission on qualifying purchases of the products we link to.

Retired Republican known as “Putin’s favorite congressman” confirms he was at the Capitol on Jan. 6

Former Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., was spotted in newly surfaced videos breaching police lines during the January 6 Capitol riot, making him the highest-profile Republican identified in the riot. 

Rohrabacher, a longtime Republican from California who now lives in York, Maine following a failed re-election campaign in 2018, admitted to the Press Herald that he broke the police barricade but said he stopped short of entering the Capitol building, encouraging his fellow insurrectionists to refrain from doing so as well. 

“I marched to protest, and I thought the election was fraudulent and it should be investigated, and I wanted to express that and be supportive of that demand,” the California congressman told the paper. “But I was not there to make a scene and do things that were unacceptable for anyone to do.”

Rohrbacher was first clocked on Saturday when a group of Twitter sleuths came upon never-before-seen footage of the insurrection. The congressman, donning an overcoat and a knit hat in the video, can be seen standing near the Lower West Plaza about 500 feet beyond the Capitol police barricade. The videos show no indication that Rohrabacher went any further. 

According to the Orange County Register, Rohrabacher delivered a speech just weeks prior during a “Stop the Steal” rally in Huntington Beach, California on December 12, where he referenced the Revolutionary War, insisting that “communists” were vying to “take control of our government.”

“We will not sit idly by while those who don’t believe in America commit voter fraud on a massive scale and steal our country away from us,” he declared. 

Former La Habra police chief Alan Hostetter of San Clemente, who also attended the rally and has since been charged in connection to the January 6 insurgency, also spoke that day. Hostetter appeared to explicitly condone to the assassination of current U.S. officials, claiming that “execution is the just punishment for the ringleaders of this coup.”

According to the Register, Hostetter’s attorney alleged that Rohrabacher was not with the former police chief on the day of the riot. “My client did not see Congressman Rohrabacher in Washington, DC,” his attorney noted. “We believe anyone peacefully protesting outside the capitol is protected by the First Amendment and should not be facing felony charges.”

After he was outed, Rohrabacher told the Herald that those who breached the Capitol building had made a mistake. “By going into the building,” he explained, “they gave the Left the ability to direct the discussion of what was going on in a way that was harmful to the things we believe in.” 

He also claimed that “leftist provocateurs” incited the rioters to break into the building. There is, however, no evidence that left-wing agent provocateurs played any role in the insurrection. Rather, there is widespread evidence that members of white nationalist militias and extremist groups played a significant role in the violence, both planning and executing the event. Many of those prosecuted belonged to far-right groups such as the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters, and the Oathkeepers. Others identified more broadly with the QAnon. 

Rohrabacher served fifteen terms in Congress, dating back to 1989. In the past, Rohrabacher staunchly fought against LBGTQ+ rights and illegal immigration. He is also known for voting to repeal Obamacare and repeatedly disputing the notion that global warming is man-made. 

In 2016, Rohrabacher, an ardent supporter of Russian President Vladimir Putin, was scrutinized for his potentially problematic connections to Russia, earning him the moniker of “Putin’s favorite congressman.” Many have speculated that his link to Putin damaged his chances of re-election.

Scientists capture the inner workings of the click beetle’s explosive jumps

When you pull the film advance lever on an analog camera, you are loading a complicated system of springs and latches. With one smooth motion, you are not just advancing unexposed film across the body of the camera — you are providing the energy that will eventually release a cascade of action: ultimately opening and closing a mechanical eye as quickly as one thousandth of a second. It’s an impressive feat of engineering, but still far too slow to catch a click beetle’s jump. 

Jumping like a click beetle requires an amazing amount of power different from human strength. We flex and contract muscles to perform work, which suits us just fine, since our muscles can efficiently generate sustained outputs of power. But click beetles don’t need sustained power to perform their incredible jumps. Instead, click beetles lock, load, and fire themselves using spring-latch systems similar to the inner workings of a mechanical camera. 

In normal situations, the click beetle skitters around like any other beetle on six tiny legs. But occasionally these beetles find themselves on their back with the ground hopelessly out of reach of their little legs. In such a situation, a click beetle may appear to squirm and flail at first, but soon enough it will begin to arch its back, pause, and then explode upwards with a loud CLICK. This jump can launch a beetle with accelerations up to 300-times that of gravity, or 100-times larger than the acceleration felt by astronauts during a rocket launch. The jump gives them an opportunity to roll and somersault in the air, hopefully landing back on their feet. 

Though researchers have turned ultra-fast cameras on these powerful creatures, it’s only recently that a team of researchers lead by Aimy A. Wissa, a professor of aerospace engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, have been able to see the inner workings of the spring and latch system during an actual jump. They found an elegant internal spring system like a camera or catapult that unleashes its stored energy in the form of an ultra-fast and powerful jump.

Imagine a click beetle divided into two halves, the head and the abdomen, which are connected by a hinge. The hinge mechanism also includes a “peg” and “lip” made of a stiff cuticle material. When the beetle bends backwards, the peg is pulled back across the lip where it can be latched, holding the beetle in its backbend. The beetle then contracts a softer, more elastic cuticle which acts against the latch, attempting to unbend itself. The resistance to this contraction is what loads the soft cuticle with elastic energy, much like stretching or compressing a spring. When the peg is finally released, it fires past the lip, releasing a huge amount of energy incredibly quickly. 

This sudden unbending of the hinge hurls the beetle into the air upwards of 20 body lengths high. Surprisingly, the beetles don’t sustain any internal or external damage during the jump or landing. Of course the beetle has a hard shell to protect it from sudden impacts but how the beetle protects its insides from its powerful clicking was still somewhat of a mystery, until now. The researchers were able to see how the soft cuticle not only allows the beetle to store and release energy, but how it also dampens the explosive actions inside the beetle’s body.

The main difficulty researchers had in understanding the spring-latch system of click beetles was actually observing their internal mechanics in real-time. The latching and loading phases typically take a few tenths of a second, but the energy release phase is much faster.  

The researchers found that opening the latch and releasing the stored energy takes the beetle about 10 milliseconds, or a quarter of the time a single frame stays projected on a movie screen. High-speed cameras can work this fast, but they can’t see through a beetle’s shell. The challenge was to find a super-fast imaging technique that could penetrate the shell and resolve the soft and springy materials, all while maintaining a high resolution to see the beetle’s tiny parts. 

Wissa and her coauthors used an approach called “synchrotron phase-contrast X-ray imaging” to overcome these complications. Normally, X-ray imaging measures how much light a material absorbs to tell you what’s going on under the skin, but the X-rays also shift slightly when they pass through different materials. By looking at how much light is absorbed and how the X-rays have shifted, researchers can see hard stuff like bones, but also soft stuff, like the elastic cuticle inside the beetle that stores and releases energy during a “click.” And unlike the X-ray imaging you may be familiar with from visiting the dentist, these X-rays recorded images at up to 30,000 frames per second. 

Beetles usually perform their clicks while laying on their backs, so the researchers held their subjects still with a gentle clamp, allowing them to record multiple clicks without filling the air with springing beetles. This let them carefully track the moving parts inside a live beetle as it performed every stage of its click, from locking and loading to unleashing the stored energy. 

The results give us a better understanding of how the inner materials of the beetle can store and release so much energy so quickly, and demonstrates a non-invasive way to probe explosive processes within other tiny animals like pistol shrimp and trap-jaw ants. The tricks these creatures use could inspire a new generation of small and super powerful insect-like robots capable of generating and sustaining high-acceleration movements.

Why is the Biden administration turning a blind eye to the Trump regime’s crimes?

The constant drip of “revelations” about the Trump regime’s crimes are about to become a torrent and a flood. In all, these “revelations” are very much like a firehose tied in a knot that is about to burst.

Over the course of the last few weeks, it has been revealed that the Trump regime spied upon journalists at the Washington Post and CNN who were reporting on Russian influence in the 2016 election. 

The American people have also learned that the Trump regime’s official policy of cruelty towards nonwhite refugees and migrants was even worse than publicly known: children were stolen from their parents by the United States government even when they could have been deported together as an intact family.

We now know that Donald Trump actually wanted the Army National Guard to be used as a protection force for his followers on January 6 as they gathered together prior to launching their lethal attack on the Capitol.

In keeping with his paranoia and aspirations to be an American Nero, Trump’s loyalists at the Department of Commerce spied upon employees and members of the public deemed to be “disloyal” because they opposed changes to the United States Census which were designed to undercount nonwhite people, especially Hispanics and Latinos.

No longer the stuff of speculation, it is now an indisputable fact that Trump’s campaign advisor Paul Manafort was sharing internal polling and other information with a known Russian spy during the 2016 presidential campaign.

In addition, audio of a 2019 phone call has been released in which Trump’s personal attorney and emissary Rudy Giuliani explicitly attempts to intimidate the leaders of the country of Ukraine into participating in a disinformation campaign against then-candidate Joe Biden, with the goal of influencing the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Over the last few days, there have been more “revelations” about the Trump regime’s apparent high crimes, abuses of power, and other misdeeds.

CNN and the New York Times have reported that following Trump’s defeat in the 2020 presidential election, White House chief of staff Mark Meadows pressured the Department of Justice to find ways to overturn the results in order to keep Trump in power.

On Thursday, the New York Times reported that the Trump regime spied upon House Intelligence Committee Democrats (and their family members and staff) who were investigating the Russia collusion scandal.

This surveillance was ostensibly designed to stop “leaks” of “classified” and other “privileged information” to protect “national security.” Although I would suggest that the real goal was to gain information about what the House Intelligence Committee knew about Trump’s and his inner circle’s contacts with Russian and other foreign agents. 

On Sunday, the New York Times also reported that in February 2018 the Trump regime ordered the Department of Justice to obtain the phone records and other information of then-White House attorney Donald McGhan and his wife. Such an order appears to be part of a larger pattern, whereby Donald Trump and his agents were obsessed with “leaks” and “traitors” and “disloyalty.” 

How has the Biden administration responded to these continuous revelations about the Trump regime’s obvious high crimes?

Instead of bringing the full force of the law and other punishments down upon the Trump regime (including members of the Republican Party in Congress), the response by the Biden administration — as seen with former Attorney General William Barr’s memos on not charging Trump for obstruction of justice, Trump’s IRS tax documents and information about his D.C. hotel, the E. Jean Carroll lawsuit and other examples (most notably not creating a truth commission to fully expose and publicly document the horrors of the Age of Trump) — has largely been tepid. 

Why is the Biden administration behaving this way?

Put simply, Joe Biden sees himself as a healer, a unifier, a type of secular national priest, and someone committed to consensus and bipartisan politics. This is his core temperament.

He truly (and incorrectly) believes that by “moving forward” from the Trump regime, and implementing public policies which help the majority of Americans, the country’s wounds will be healed and neofascism defeated.

Joe Biden and the Democratic Party’s leadership have convinced themselves that properly investigating the Trump regime and its Republican allies and enablers will be a distraction from their policy agenda.

Joe Biden and his administration also have an unwavering faith in and commitment to the stability and strength of America’s political institutions. For them, the country’s core institutions and their legitimacy must be protected at all costs.

But this involves an error in reasoning and assumptions: what if the institutions are already deeply flawed, and Trumpism only accelerated their decline (and perhaps even collapse)?

Moreover, the Biden administration and the Department of Justice are committed to maintaining precedent and protecting the presidency from what they see as undo limitations on the power of the office. Such a standard will only empower future authoritarians and dictators-in-waiting.

The above explanations are largely correct. However, they overlook the unifying and ominous explanation that is hiding in plain sight.

It is more likely than not that the true extent of the Trump regime’s crimes are so great and horrible that the Biden administration and senior members of the Democratic Party have either actively decided or come to a tacit understanding that it is in the best interest of the country to somehow conceal them — or at the very least, to let these heinous acts leak out slowly, as to then be lost down the memory well.

In plain English, something about this whole thing stinks.

The image that comes to my mind is that of President Biden walking behind a Trump-Republican elephant with a shovel to pick up its endless waste. No matter how fast and carefully Joe Biden and his helpers scoop up the Trump-Republican elephant’s turds, there is always a stink in the air and some residue on the ground.

Democracies fail a bit at a time, and then all at once. The United States is in a crisis moment. To slow the march of neofascism requires a great reckoning. Part of that reckoning demands a full public accounting of the Trump regime and its allies’ and enablers’ crimes against democracy and the American people.

In a new essay at Common Dreams, Thom Hartmann summarizes this idea of a great reckoning:

Prosecuting Trump, Barr, and the other corrupt members of his administration and people around him is not a matter of political payback. It has very little to do with Donald Trump or the Republican party, in fact: it’s about the future of our republic.

They must be held accountable.

President Biden and Congress must appoint an independent, special prosecutor (or equivalent) and set up an office within the Justice Department to look into crimes committed in the White House during the previous four years.

If we fail to do this soon, it will become practically and politically impossible. And if America fails to hold its rich and powerful to account, particularly the man who corrupted the highest office in the land, we will have truly gone down the same path as an increasingly corrupted ancient Rome, leading straight to the death of our republic, too.

Are the American people mature enough to grapple with the true scale of what Donald Trump and his regime afflicted upon them and the country? I do not know. But the American people must learn the whole truth through public hearings and commissions, investigative reporting, from whistle-blowers, and all other available means if the country’s democracy is to be saved.

Joe Biden may have convinced himself that it is best to protect the American people from such dangerous truths. And if Biden has indeed come to such a conclusion, it will be a stain on the legacy of his presidency and a note made in large print on the epitaph of American democracy.

It’s raining “forever chemicals” in the Great Lakes

In northern Michigan, across rolling sand dunes and a picturesque village situated on Lake Michigan, it is raining toxic PFAS chemicals. 

No, really. It is.

A team of U.S. and Canadian scientists analyzed rainfall at six sites across the Great Lakes region and found high levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, at all the sites, including, surprisingly, rural Michigan. The rainwater samples contained PFAS levels between 100 to 400 parts per trillion (ppt). For comparison, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s “safe” limit for drinking water — not rainwater — is 70 ppt. 

The findings highlight the ubiquitous nature of PFAS chemicals, man-made substances used in common household products because of their water-, oil-, and grease-resistant qualities. Firefighting foam is also a main source of PFAS. Commonly referred to as “forever chemicals,” their legacy can be found everywhere — in soil, groundwater, lakes, oceans, and now, even the rain.

“All of these products that we use in our everyday life are treated with PFAS,” Marta Venier, an environmental chemist at Indiana University and the principal investigator for the research, told Grist. “So every time we use them, there is either dust or air where these chemicals are released.”

PFAS chemicals are transported through the air and then deposited via precipitation into the environment, where it accumulates, can be ingested by wildlife, and can wind up in the human body. Studies indicate that exposure to PFAS chemicals can cause reproductive, liver, kidney, and immunological damage in laboratory animals. It’s also a possible carcinogen — two PFAS chemicals have been shown to cause tumors in animal studies. 

The new research was conducted by the Integrated Atmospheric Deposition Network, a monitoring program funded by the U.S. EPA’s Great Lakes National Program Office, and managed by Indiana University.  

Beginning last August, scientists collected ambient air and rainwater samples for 38 different PFAS compounds from six sites across the Great Lakes region: Cleveland, Ohio, Chicago, Illinois, Sturgeon Point, New York, Point Petre in Ontario, Canada, and Sleeping Bear Dunes and Eagle Harbor, both in Michigan. Both the rural and urban sites’ rainwater showed high levels of PFAS contamination. 

The research also showed the magnitude of the problem — at all six test sites, there was more PFAS than other pollutants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Scientists say the early analysis, first presented at the Emerging Contaminants in the Environment Conference in April, shows that PFAS chemicals are a major contaminant regionally in snow and rain. 

While immediate exposure to the contaminated rainwater isn’t a concern, scientists warn that because PFAS chemicals linger in the environment, there could be serious long-term effects of airborne PFAS contamination on wildlife and human health. “There’s a lot of information that needs to be pieced together,” said Venier. 

The findings add to the growing body of research on airborne movement and deposition of PFAS. This past April, another group of researchers, from the College of Wooster, shared their findingsfrom testing rainwater in Ohio and Indiana at a meeting of the American Chemical Society. The scientists found 17 different PFAS chemicals in the rainwater. 

Researchers plan to keep analyzing PFAS in rainwater to be able to trace the chemicals back to specific polluters, and to evaluate seasonal trends in concentration. In 2018, for example, investigators in North Carolina traced PFAS chemicals from rainwater to Chemours, a chemical manufacturing facility in Bladen County, prompting the state agency to order emissions reductions. 

With other chemicals, like PAHs, researchers have found that the levels are higher in the winter when we use heat more, so Venier plans to look for the same trends with PFAS to increase understanding so regulatory action can be taken based on the findings.

6 kitchen scraps to use in the garden — even if you don’t compost

If you’re already composting (be it on your countertop, in your backyard, or squirreled away in the freezer), good for you! Composting, while very advantageous for the environment and our kitchen scraps, is sometimes a hard hobby to get into. If you haven’t yet picked it up, but are looking for ways to reduce your kitchen waste, look no further. There are plenty of ways to use your leftovers in your garden, from organic pest deterrents, to yellow jacket traps, to ground covering that prevents weed growth. Read on for some of our favorite scrap-lications.

Eggshells

  • Use eggshells as seed-starter pots. (You’ll want to plan ahead for this one and crack the eggshells close to one end to maximize “pot” size.) When your seedlings get big enough to plant, thin them as needed by keeping only one or two of the strongest-looking seedlings, gently crack the eggshell, and plant the whole thing (eggshell and all) in your garden.
  • Save your eggshells for the birds. Seed-eating birds need grit to help them digest their food; plus, eggshells give them an added benefit: Calcium. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology recommends baking eggshells in the oven for 20 minutes at 250° F to sterilize the eggshells (if you’re using eggshells from hard-cooked eggs you can skip this part). Let the eggshells cool, crush them into small pieces, and then set them out for the birds on a dish or a platform feeder.
  • Use them as a pest deterrent. Some gardening sources recommend sprinkling crushed eggshells around plants to discourage slugs and snails. If you have a lot of eggshells on hand and don’t have a major slug infestation, this might be worth a try. In “The Truth About Garden Remedies: What Works, What Doesn’t, and Why,” author Jeff Gillman recommends creating a ring around plants with crushed eggshells that is at least 1/4-inch thick and 2 inches wide. (But, if you have a serious slug issue, he also notes that you’ll have more success repelling slugs with diatomaceous earth.)
  • Use eggshells as fertilizer — they’ll add calcium to your soil. Crushed eggshells can be added to holes when planting seedlings in your garden, or you can work eggshells into the soil around plants in an already planted garden — Gillman recommends using 4 or 5 eggshells per plant. And bonus: This same method is also suggested as a way to stave off blossom-end rot in tomato plants.

Coffee grounds 

  • Coffee grounds can be used to set up a slug-deterring barrier, just as the eggshells were above.
  • Used coffee grounds can be used as mulch in the garden to repel cats, rabbits, and squirrels. Although “The New York Times One Thousand Gardening Questions and Answers” book cautions that this treatment might repel you, too: “Few elements of vegetable garbage are as garbagy-smelling as week-old wet coffee grounds.”
  • For a less-aromatic option, work the grounds into the soil. The above-mentioned New York Times book says used coffee grounds are “especially welcome around onions, lettuce, corn, and other nitrogen lovers.”
  • If you don’t want to put them directly in the soil, “The Alternative Kitchen Garden” suggests adding the grounds to water, and then water your plants with the nitrogen-rich water.

Banana peels 

  • Organic Gardening Magazine (now relaunched as Rodale’s Organic Life) uses banana peels to make a yellow jacket trap with other ingredients you likely already have on hand: water, sugar, and apple cider vinegar. 
  • Bury small pieces of banana peels around plants, only an inch or two deep, to repel aphids. The key words here are “small pieces” — don’t get lazy and bury whole peels, unless you want to start attracting larger pests.
  • You can bury small pieces of banana peels in your soil even if you don’t have a pest problem: Banana peels will add nutrients to the soil as they decay.
  • Ann Gibson, a.k.a. the Micro Gardener, feeds banana peels to staghorn ferns. Place a banana peel (or a piece of a peel) between the fern and the backboard the fern is mounted on, it will gradually release nutrients over time when it is watered. If you’re not keen on tucking banana peels into your houseplants, she also suggests soaking a fresh banana peel in water for a day or two and then using that water to water the staghorn fern and other plants.

Orange peels 

  • Scatter small pieces of orange peels around garden plants, they will act as a cat deterrent.
  • Orange peels work as a pest deterrent, too: Either shallowly bury small pieces of peel around plants or sprinkle shredded or grated peels around plants to repel aphids and ants.
  • If you have a fire pit, you can use dried orange peels as an aromatic fire starter. Our friends at Apartment Therapy recommend spreading the peels out on a sheet pan or cooling rack and letting them air dry.
  • Orange peels work as a mosquito repellent, too. If you’re into citrusy fragrances, rub peels directly on your skin (the outside of the peel, as you’re trying to get the oil on your skin). Otherwise follow Apartment Therapy‘s lead and use small pieces as refill strips for mosquito repelling devices

Nut shells 

  • If you’re a habitual peanut- or pistachio-eater, save those nut shells for something other than dumping in the trash. They can be broken up into pieces and used as a thick layer that protects against weeds popping up.
  • Mixing nut shells in with your soil can also help aerate otherwise compact soil.

Cooking water 

  • Don’t dump the water you used to boil an egg or blanch a vegetable — save it, let it cool, and fill up your watering can. Your plants will thank you, and so will the greater earth, right?

Spicy peppers, garlic, and onion 

  • Save these potent scraps for warding off pests in your garden. There are many ways to prevent insects, deer, rabbits, and the like from attacking your backyard crops, but one of the most commonly recommended ways is spraying spicy or harsh flavored spray onto your plants, which can be made by infusing water with the spicy stuff.